Article | Open | Published:

# Epsin and Sla2 form assemblies through phospholipid interfaces

## Abstract

In clathrin-mediated endocytosis, adapter proteins assemble together with clathrin through interactions with specific lipids on the plasma membrane. However, the precise mechanism of adapter protein assembly at the cell membrane is still unknown. Here, we show that the membrane–proximal domains ENTH of epsin and ANTH of Sla2 form complexes through phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) lipid interfaces. Native mass spectrometry reveals how ENTH and ANTH domains form assemblies by sharing PIP2 molecules. Furthermore, crystal structures of epsin Ent2 ENTH domain from S. cerevisiae in complex with PIP2 and Sla2 ANTH domain from C. thermophilum illustrate how allosteric phospholipid binding occurs. A comparison with human ENTH and ANTH domains reveal only the human ENTH domain can form a stable hexameric core in presence of PIP2, which could explain functional differences between fungal and human epsins. We propose a general phospholipid-driven multifaceted assembly mechanism tolerating different adapter protein compositions to induce endocytosis.

## Introduction

Clathrin-mediated endocytosis is essential for protein retrieval during neurotransmission and receptor recycling. It is also involved in viral entry and the uptake of nutrients and hormones. During endocytosis, a cargo-containing vesicle is formed through the invagination of a plasma membrane patch, in a process that involves proteins and specific lipids. Accumulation of the adapter proteins at the plasma membrane initiates the endocytic event and contributes to membrane bending1. The adapters recruit clathrin and associate with the actin cytoskeleton to accomplish vesicle budding2. Finally, the vesicle coated with clathrin and adapter proteins is detached from the plasma membrane by dynamin3.

The size and shape of the vesicle is determined by the interplay of adapter proteins and clathrin4. Clathrin does not bind to the plasma membrane directly, but to a range of adapter proteins that interact with lipids on the plasma membrane. Many adapter proteins, such as epsin5, AP1806, and AP-27, contain positively charged patches that bind to the head groups of specific phospholipids. This binding is strong enough so that the adapter proteins remain attached to the membrane, and can undergo conformational changes to bind cargo7. Adapter proteins containing an epsin N-terminal homology (ENTH) domain5,8 and some adapter proteins containing an AP180 N-terminal homology (ANTH) domain that belong to the subfamily of clathrin assembly lymphoid myeloid leukemia (CALM) proteins9, have an additional membrane-binding mode, inserting an N-terminal helix into the plasma membrane. It is proposed that there is a concerted mechanism where binding to the head group of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) triggers the N-terminal portion of these adapter proteins to fold into an α helix. The insertion of the α helix into the membrane contributes to its curvature1.

It is unclear whether the clathrin-associated adapter proteins engage clathrin individually at the cell membrane, or whether they assemble in larger structures to drive membrane curvature and clathrin recruitment10. It has also been proposed that membrane curvature is caused simply by a protein crowding mechanism, where the formation of the clathrin coat crowds adapter proteins together, leading to membrane curvature11. Critically, the combination of membrane insertions and spherical scaffolds that curve the membrane have been observed10, but their interactions are not understood. There are indications that adapter proteins themselves form larger oligomers, preceding the formation of the clathrin coat. Complex formation has been observed between the ENTH domain of epsin and the ANTH domain of Sla2, the yeast homolog of human huntingtin interacting protein 1 related (Hip1R)12. The formation of this complex depends on the presence of PIP2 and has been observed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A pulldown experiment with full-length epsin-1 and Hip1R from Mus musculus suggested the same complex forms in mammals13. Endocytosis is stalled in S. cerevisiae when the complex between the ENTH domain of epsin Ent1 and the ANTH domain of Sla2 is disrupted by mutagenesis12. Electron cryo-tomography studies on helical assemblies of epsin Ent1 ENTH and Sla2 ANTH domains obtained from giant unilamellar vesicles (GUV)s revealed that the co-assembly of ENTH/ANTH occurs14. The ENTH/ANTH assembly may help organize the clathrin coat and could contribute to membrane curvature during the initial stages of endocytosis14. It is of particular interest that epsin and Sla2 form a membrane-bound scaffold, because these adapter proteins have also been associated with actin recruitment to the coated pit. Actin polymerization is known to provide mechanical force for vesicle formation from membranes under tension15. The adapter assembly would harness singular weak interactions together to form an anchor that can withstand the strong forces generated by the actin cytoskeleton.

In this paper, we reveal the assembly process of epsin ENTH and Sla2/Hip1R ANTH domains through PIP2 interfaces by native MS. An X-ray crystal structure of the ENTH domain of epsin Ent2 from S. cerevisiae in complex with PIP2 reveals an allosteric mechanism underlying the assembly. The crystal structure of the Sla2 ANTH domain from C. thermophilum reveals how this subfamily of ANTH domains evolved to engage ENTH domains in assembly. We determine by native MS that some elements of the assembly process are evolutionarily conserved between the fungal and human adapter proteins. However, human epsin ENTH can autonomously form homo-oligomers, whereas fungal ENTH domains need the presence of Sla2 ANTH domains to create stable assemblies. Together, these data suggest that the ENTH/ANTH complex concentrates PIP2 locally on the plasma membrane to facilitate the formation of adapter complexes with cargo, clathrin, or other adapter proteins through PIP2-dependent interfaces.

## Results

### Cooperative binding of PIP2 to the ENTH domain of epsin

To investigate how a lipid-dependent protein complex is formed between epsin ENTH domain and the Sla2/Hip1R ANTH domain, we first determined the binding between the PIP2 lipid (diC8-PIP2) and ENTH domains from S. cerevisiae alone using native MS16,17. The Ent1 and Ent2 ENTH domains (ENTH1 and ENTH2) from S. cerevisiae as well as an ENTH domain of homologous epsin from C. thermophilum bind up to two PIP2 molecules per domain (Fig. 1a, b). Based on a direct MS approach18,19, macroscopic dissociation constants were determined revealing dependence of the two PIP2-binding sites by positive cooperativity20 (Fig. 1c and Supplementary 11). Results were comparable for the MS optimized ammonium acetate concentration of 300 mM and the more physiological ionic strength of 160 mM ammonium acetate (Supplementary Table 1).

A crystal structure was determined of a complex between the ENTH domain of Ent2 (ENTH2) from S. cerevisiae and the PIP2 phospholipid to a resolution of 3.4 Å (Table 1). The structure shows two ENTH2 domains sandwiched around one PIP2 molecule (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 1). The inositol head group of PIP2 is bound to the previously identified phosphatidylinositol-binding pocket of one of the ENTH2 molecules5. The N-terminal region of this ENTH2 molecule is folded into an α helix that corresponds to the helix (α0) that has been observed in the ENTH domain of rat epsin-1 in complex with the phosphoinositol (IP3) group5, and this copy is labeled ENTH2α0. In the second ENTH2 molecule, the N-terminal α0 is unfolded (ENTH2Noα0), and the electron density suggests the N-terminal residues are extended. A superimposition of the ENTH1/IP3 domain complex structure of rat epsin-15 onto the ENTH2/PIP2 domain crystal structure from S. cerevisiae results in an RMSD of 1.1 Å for 147 residues showing distinct orientations of the α0 helix (Fig. 2b). In the ENTH1/IP3 structure, the α0 helix folds back onto the phosphoinositol group, so that Arg 8 and Lys 11 interact with an inositol head group. In the ENTH2/PIP2 structure, the α0 helix points away from the ENTH2 domain and there are no interactions with the phosphoinositol group. Instead, the evolutionarily conserved residue Tyr 16 of the ENTH2α0 molecule forms direct interactions with the inositol head group of PIP2.

As a result of α0 reorientation pointing away from the ENTH2α0 molecule, the second ENTH2Noα0 molecule can form interactions with the phosphatidylinositol head group. Interestingly, the ENTH2Noα0 domain is oriented toward the PIP2 molecule to involve residue Thr 104 on α6 in the ENTH2 dimer interface. This residue is crucial for the formation of the ENTH/ANTH complex12,14,21. Thr 104 of ENTH2Noα0 is in the periphery of the PIP2-binding site, and sits opposite Tyr 68 and Lys 69 of the ENTH2α0 molecule. Thr 104 is conserved in epsin ENTH domains and is essential for ENTH function, though independent from the canonical PIP2-binding site22,23. Native MS on a Thr104Glu mutant of ENTH1 from S. cerevisiae shows a reduction of PIP2 binding, where the binding of two PIP2 molecules is barely observed (Fig. 1b), indicating impairment of the binding site.

To analyze the contribution of the PIP2 molecule to complex formation, we calculated the buried surface area contributions for each molecule with PISA24. The total solvent accessible area of the phosphatidylinositol head group of PIP2 is 488 Å2. Most of the head group is buried by the ENTH2α0 molecule (306 Å2, or 63% of the total available surface area of the PIP2 molecule), whereas the ENTH2Noα0 molecule covers 95 Å2, or 20% of the available surface area. The buried solvent area between ENTH2α0 and ENTH2Noα0 is 1820 Å2, with almost equal contributions from ENTH2α0 (955 Å2) and ENTH2Noα0 (865 Å2). However, most of the buried area (1020 Å2) contributed to the dimer interface comes from the α0 helix of the ENTHα0 domain, which is repositioned by the PIP2 molecule to facilitate dimer formation. The effect of PIP2 binding is therefore twofold; it attaches the ENTH domain to the membrane and displaces the α0 helix, so it can form a dimer with a second ENTH domain. As a further indication that the ENTH2 dimer, which sandwiched PIP2, is functionally relevant, a similar dimer interface is observed in a crystal structure of the epsin Ent1 ENTH domain (ENTH1) from S. cerevisiae at 2.9 Å resolution (Fig. 2c). Here, a 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol (MPD) molecule from the crystallization solution has caused a displacement of the α0 helix to allow dimer formation between ENTH1 domains.

In the ENTH2/PIP2 structure, two α0 helices from symmetry-related ENTH2α0 molecules stack against each other to create a homotetramer containing two PIP2 molecules in the same plane, ready to insert into the membrane (Fig. 2d). In this planar orientation, four ENTH molecules line up so they could associate with the plasma membrane, whereas the C-termini are pointing away from the membrane. The α0 helices of the ENTH2α0 domains are not positioned to insert into the membrane. However, the unfolded N-terminal regions of ENTH2Noα0 as well as the neighboring positively charged PIP2-binding patch consisting of residues Lys 14, Arg 24, Arg 72, and His 72 are lying in the same plane as the lipid tail of PIP2 being aligned with the cell membrane. The N-terminus is therefore ideally positioned to bind another PIP2 molecule on the plasma membrane. We thus conclude that the PIP2/ENTH2 crystal structure shows an intermediate state, where the binding of one PIP2 dimerizes two ENTH2 domains and prepares the “empty” ENTH domain to bind another PIP2. This allosteric switch between PIP2 binding, dimerization, and the formation of α0 could potentially create larger epsin clusters on the cell membrane.

### The Sla2 ANTH domain evolved to bind the ENTH/PIP2 complex

Native MS was also used to investigate PIP2 binding to several ANTH domains, showing two PIP2 binding sites for all wild-type proteins (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Table 1). There is a striking difference in PIP2 binding between human CALM and the fungal Sla2 ANTH domains. The macroscopic dissociation constants for CALM suggest higher affinity for the first PIP2-binding site, and a lack of cooperative binding (Supplementary Table 1). Mutagenesis of the canonical PIP2-binding site on the Sla2 ANTH molecule from S. cerevisiae revealed the presence of a specific secondary binding site that has so far not been identified. Implementing the dissociation constant of the mutant into a mathematical model (Fig. 1c) revealed dependence and positive cooperativity of the two binding sites. In general, PIP2 dissociation constants are higher for Sla2 ANTH domains than for ENTH domains from S. cerevisiae showing KDs of 100–250 µM (Supplementary Table 1).

To understand why the ANTH domain of Sla2/Hip1R is specifically suited to bind the ENTH domain of epsins through the lipid interface, we determined the crystal structure of the ANTH domain of homologous Sla2 from C. thermophilum to 1.8 Å resolution (Table 1). The overall ANTH fold consists of helices α1–α11 and is conserved between CALM and Sla2/Hip1R subfamilies (Fig. 3b). A structure-based sequence alignment of CALM subfamily members CALM and AP1806 reveals two hitherto hidden, systematic and evolutionarily conserved features (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 2). Through insertion of a conserved Tyr 252 and a hydrophobic residue, an extra α helix (α12) uniquely occurs in Sla2 ANTH domains, providing rigidity. A loop connecting helices α8 and α9 has a five-residue extension in Sla2, although with non-conserved sequence. Based on the low-resolution electron microscopy tomogram of the Ent1 ENTH/ANTH Sla2 complex from S. cerevisiae, these insertions point at the epsin interface14. Moreover, deleting the Sla2/Hip1R-specific α12 helix impaired the function of the Sla2 ANTH domain similarly to mutating Arg 29, which is essential for the ENTH/ANTH complex formation (Fig. 3c)14. In addition, the CALM ANTH domain has an N-terminal helix that is affecting membrane curvature9, and that is similar to α0 observed in epsins. Based on the C. thermophilum Sla2 ANTH crystal structure, ANTH domains of the Sla2/Hip1R subfamily do not contain an N-terminal α helix. This is further confirmed by circular dichroism experiments performed on several ANTH and ENTH domains (Supplementary Fig. 3). Sla2/Hip1R ANTH domains display a loss of secondary structure or aggregation at high PIP2 concentrations (Supplementary Fig. 3c, f). To address whether this is caused by PIP2 itself, or the presence of an amphipathic environment, we repeated the circular dichroism measurements in the presence of submicellar and micellar concentrations of the detergent n-Dodecyl-beta-Maltoside (DDM) with and without PIP2 (Supplementary Fig. 3g, h). Human Hip1R ANTH domain shows a loss of signal with DDM (Supplementary Fig. 3h). The protein seems to undergo unfolding in the presence of an amphipathic environment, which would not be expected for a protein that contains a helix inducible by lipid binding. In contrast, CALM displays a clear increase in signal in the presence of DDM and PIP2 compared to the protein in buffer alone or with PIP2. In addition, when only the detergent above micellar concentrations is added, we further observe an increase in the signal. This experiment shows that it is actually the presence of the micellar environment and not only the phospholipid per se that is inducing/stabilizing helical structures in the protein and is in agreement with what has been previously reported for CALM that contains an α0 amphipathic helix9. We therefore conclude that N-terminal amphipathic helices are not characteristic of either ANTH subfamily, but are only present in a subset of CALM adapter proteins.

### Ordered assembly formation of fungal ENTH and Sla2 ANTH

To determine how universal PIP2-dependent interactions between ENTH and ANTH domains are, we analyzed PIP2-driven complex formation for a selection of ENTH and ANTH domains by native MS. We tested complex formation between the S. cerevisiae ENTH2 domain and the ANTH domain of Sla2 to verify the assembly relevant to the ENTH2/PIP2 crystal structure (Fig. 4). Indeed, an assembly with a stoichiometry of 8:8:24 ± 3 for ENTH2/ANTHSla2/PIP2 is formed, similar to the ENTH1 complex and ENTH/ANTHSla2 complex of C. thermophilum (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 2). When equal amounts of S. cerevisiae ENTH1 and ENTH2 are mixed together with ANTHSla2 and measured by native MS, a complex containing equal amounts of ENTH1 and ENTH2 is formed, showing no preference for either isoform and highlighting the possibility to recruit different epsins into a complex with Sla2 (Supplementary Fig. 4a). Furthermore, complex formation was impaired for the ENTH1 Thr 104 mutant (Supplementary Fig. 6), confirming previous ITC measurements14.

Although the hetero 16-mer of the fungal ENTH/ANTHSla2 complex is most prominent, a smaller oligomer of ~330 kDa is also observed (Fig. 4) consisting of six ENTH and six ANTH domains (ENTH1/2/ANTHSla2/PIP2 is 6:6:19 ± 2). Further information on complex topology was obtained in collision-induced dissociation (CID) MS/MS, in which proteins unfold partially until small proteins from the periphery are ejected. Here, hetero 12-mers and 16-mers show identical dissociation pathways. The larger ANTH domain is ejected from the complexes while all PIP2 and ENTH molecules remain bound to the complexes, indicating localization of ANTH in the periphery around an ENTH/PIP2 core (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 4).

It seems that the ENTH/ANTH/PIP2 mixtures form transient complexes that can alter in size. To understand the relationship between the two oligomeric states, oligomeric composition of a mixture of ENTH, ANTHSla2 (both S. cerevisiae), and PIP2 was monitored by native MS over time. The changing signal intensities revealed a maturation process enriching the larger hetero 16-mer (Fig. 5a). Amounts of hetero 12-mer and 16-mer complexes are approximately equal 1 min after mixing. Within 2 min, the 12-mer signal fades, and the 16-mer gets predominant. These results and the equilibrium ratio of 12-mers and 16-mers show that the hetero 16-mer is the more stable ENTH/ANTH/PIP2 complex, suggesting that the 12-mer is an assembly intermediate. Furthermore, complex assembly is reversible upon depletion and subsequent replenishing of PIP2 (Supplementary Fig. 4c).

### Human ENTH forms a hexameric core upon PIP2 binding

It was previously reported that full-length Hip1R can only be pulled down by murine epsin ENTH in the presence of PIP2, suggesting that the PIP2-dependent formation of ENTH/ANTH complexes could be conserved in mammals13. To verify evolutionary conservation of ENTH/ANTH/PIP2 complexes, a mixture of human epsin-1 ENTH domain with human Hip1R ANTH domain and PIP2 was analyzed by native MS, showing less homogeneity with a larger variety of oligomers (Fig. 5b). However, the hetero 16-mers observed with S. cerevisiae domains were also present in samples with human domains. The majority of human ENTH/ANTH complexes consist of a combination of six epsin ENTH molecules and a range of ANTH Hip1R molecules. Contrary to the fungal samples, the ENTH hexamer is already observed in the presence of PIP2 alone (Fig. 5c). A minimum of six PIP2 molecules is required for human ENTH hexamer formation. The appearance of the hexameric ENTH core in the human homolog suggests higher stability compared to fungal homologs.

To confirm existence of the hexameric human ENTH core with PIP2 in solution and to gain further insight into its structure, small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) was performed on human ENTH (Supplementary Table 3). In the presence of PIP2, a uniform hexameric species is observed (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Table 3). Using the ENTH2/PIP2 dimeric interface from the S. cerevisiae ENTH2/PIP2 crystal structure as a rigid body, and representing the C-terminal parts missing in the crystal structure as dummy residue chains, a model for the hexamer was constructed yielding an excellent fit to the experimental data (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Fig. 4d). Three ENTH domains are oriented with α0 helices in plane of the cell membrane, in accordance with previous observations5,8,25. For the three other ENTH domains, the PIP2 molecule is still oriented in plane with the cell membrane (Fig. 6c), but α0 is pointing away, available to interact with additional ENTH domains to form larger oligomers. Similarly, the interface involving Thr 104 is alternatively used for hexamer formation as well as further oligomerization through phospholipid interfaces.

The potential secondary PIP2-binding sites are also available for docking of ENTH or ANTH domains bringing in their own PIP2 molecule to make a larger assembly.

### Characterization of phospholipid-dependent complex formation

We used thermal denaturation aggregation assays by dynamic light scattering (DLS), to investigate stability differences between fungal and human ENTH/ANTH/PIP2 complexes. ENTH1 from S. cerevisiae in the presence of PIP2 shows a relatively low mid-aggregation temperature (Tagg) of 33 °C (Fig. 6d), which increases to 37 °C when ANTHSla2 is added. In contrast, the hexameric human ENTH core shows a Tagg of 45 °C in the presence of PIP2, which is more stable than the assembled fungal ENTH/ANTH complex. The optimal body temperature for H. sapiens is 37 °C, and the thermostability assay indicates that human ENTH domain alone will form a stable complex at that temperature, in contrast to ENTH domains from S. cerevisiae.

To test whether PIP2 binding is the driving force for complex formation, rather than direct protein–protein interactions, we looked for cross-species complexes from C. thermophilum and S. cerevisiae by native MS, ITC, and DLS (Supplementary Fig. 5). Indeed, such complexes can be formed and are surprisingly robust as measured by ITC (KD = 450 nM ± 59 nM) (Supplementary Fig. 5c, d), despite low sequence identity. We also investigated whether the ANTHSla2 domains from S. cerevisiae and C. thermophilum bind to the human epsin ENTH core. The human-fungi cross-species assemblies show degenerated formation of PIP2-dependent complexes, with the 6:6 complex as the largest assembly observed by native MS (Supplementary Fig. 5b). These cross-species measurements confirm that human ENTH forms a stable hexameric core in the presence of PIP2, which can be decorated by ANTH domains through PIP2 interfaces. However, the fungal ANTH cannot open up the hexameric core to create larger assemblies as in the human ENTH/ANTH system.

## Discussion

Clathrin-mediated endocytosis involves a diverse set of adapter proteins that help to curve the cell membrane and to recruit clathrin and cargo. The initial stages of vesicle coat assembly involve many adapter proteins and may involve many alternative assemblies26. Epsin and the phospholipid PIP2 are essential for clathrin-mediated endocytosis22,27, and we show how assemblies are formed between the ENTH domain of epsin and the ANTH domain of Sla2 in fungi. The ENTH and ANTH domains both contain two PIP2-binding sites, as determined by native MS. It has to be noted that the mature ENTH/ANTH 8:8 complexes contain only 24 ± 3 PIP2 molecules, which is much less than 32 PIP2 expected based on the number of available PIP2-binding sites. This indicates that PIP2 is shared between domains, and acts as a glue to bring these adapter proteins together. Recently, a similar gluing mechanism has been discovered using native MS for specific lipids that strengthen the oligomerization of membrane proteins28. This gluing mechanism is illustrated further by the X-ray crystal structure of the ENTH2 domain from S. cerevisiae in complex with PIP2, where one PIP2 molecule is sandwiched between two ENTH domains. The two ENTH2 domains glued together are structurally distinct. The ENTH2 domain that captured the PIP2 molecule in the canonical-binding pocket has an N-terminal region that is folded into an α helix. In contrast, the ENTH2 domain that associates to the other side of the PIP2 molecule through an interface that includes residue Thr 104 has an unfolded N-terminus. This ENTH2 domain could capture another PIP2 molecule on the cell membrane, which in turn would fold the N-terminal region into an α helix. This structure therefore not only confirms the presence of an allosteric switch upon PIP2 binding, but also shows how this binding event can trigger further oligomerization of ENTH domains at the cell surface. It is intriguing that this oligomerization process could include both ENTH1 and ENTH2 domains, and that the ANTHSla2 domain from S. cerevisiae does not show preference for either ENTH domain. This indicates that both epsins Ent1 and Ent2 can contribute to the assembly of the epsin/Sla2 complex, and qualifies the redundancy that is observed between epsin family members.

So far, it seems the formation of the PIP2-driven complex between ENTH and ANTH domains is limited to Sla2/Hip1R ANTH domains12,13,21. Attempts to form PIP2-driven assemblies between ENTH domains and AP180/CALM subfamily members by native MS were unsuccessful. A crystal structure of the Sla2 ANTH domain from C. thermophilum reveals that Hip1R-related ANTH domains have two evolutionarily conserved insertions that contribute to the epsin/Hip1R interface to enable PIP2-dependent ENTH/ANTHSla2 complex formation. Especially the insertion of an α helix around Tyr 252 provides surface complementarity in the ENTH/ANTHSla2-binding interface, compared to the structures of the ANTH domains of AP180/CALM proteins. Superimposition of the ENTH domain with the secondary PIP2-binding site shows how the PIP2 molecule fits into the ENTH/ANTHSla2 interface close to the PIP2-binding pocket on the ANTHSla2 molecule (Fig. 3b). The residues Thr 104 from ENTH and Arg 37 from C. thermophilum ANTHSla2 are facing each other and have been shown by mutagenesis to be essential for the formation of the ENTH/ANTHSla2 complex14. In addition, residue Arg 37 can toggle its side chain between the canonical PIP2-binding site of ANTH domains, and the ENTH/ANTHSla2 interface.

The biophysical experiments presented here have revealed that there is a difference in epsin and Sla2/Hip1R ENTH/ANTH complex assembly between fungal and human proteins. There is a general sequence of events revealed by native MS (Fig. 7). After PIP2 binding, ENTH domains form a core that is decorated on the outside by ANTH domains. Many different assemblies may occur, but in fungi the ENTH core alone is not stable enough to be maintained. The ENTH and ANTH domains cluster to yield a homogeneous 8:8 complex (Fig. 7a). In humans, the ENTH hexamer core is stable, but once it is decorated with ANTH, many different clusters may form (Fig. 7b). Our in vitro data are in nice agreement with cell biological studies on epsins and Sla2/Hip1R proteins in yeast12, amoebae21,23, and mammals13. In S. cerevisiae, Sla2 ANTH is needed for the stable binding of epsin ENTH to the endocytic site and both proteins are essential for actin-dependent endocytosis12,14. In contrast, mammalian epsin ENTH binds to the endocytic site in the absence of Hip1R13 and is necessary for Hip1R recruitment to the endocytic site. Consequently, an absence of epsin has more impact on endocytosis than the lack of Hip1R, suggesting epsin ENTH is crucial in PIP2-driven adapter protein complex formation in mammalian endocytosis. The independent formation of higher oligomers of the human ENTH domain alone was also observed in giant unilamellar vesicles by fluorescence microscopy25.

Autonomous assembly of human ENTH domains driven by PIP2 creates a scaffold that could contribute to membrane bending and scission29. Since the interactions between the ENTH domains are dominated by PIP2 interfaces, different epsins can contribute to the scaffolding, explaining why only a complete knockout of all epsins shows a phenotype that disrupts CME13. We propose that mammalian ENTH domains not only curve the membrane by the insertion of an amphipathic helix, but also can form a membrane scaffold when PIP2 is concentrated at an endocytic site. This proposal would also give further credence to molecular crowding mechanisms that are aided by the accumulation of phospholipid-dependent assemblies of adapter proteins30. Further studies on formation of complexes between PIP2-binding adapter proteins will hopefully provide insights into seeding and maturation processes that help to dedicate vesicles to certain endocytic or exocytic pathways.

## Methods

### Chemicals

Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate diC8 (PIP2) was purchased from Echelon. n-dodecyl β-d-maltoside (DDM) was purchased from Anatrace.

### Constructs and plasmids

The coding sequence for the ANTH and ENTH homologs from Chaetomium thermophilum were amplified from an RNA library kindly provided by Peer Bork’s laboratory (see constructs in Supplementary Table 4); EMBL Heidelberg31 using the QIAGEN OneStep RT-PCR Kit. The reverse transcription was done at 50 °C for 30 min and the second round PCR was performed in the presence of solution Q and a touchdown procedure was introduced starting at 72 °C (see primers in Supplementary Table 5). The DNA coding sequence was cloned in pETM-11/LIC vector (EMBL).

Human CALM coding sequence has been purchased from Addgene (Plasmid #27691) and the ANTH domain was cloned in pETM-11/LIC vector for expression with an N-terminal 6xHis-tag. Sequence coding for ANTH domain of human Hip1R (aa 1–300) was PCR amplified from human cDNA and cloned into the NcoI-XhoI sites of pETM30 (EMBL). Sequence coding for ENTH domain of human EPN1 (aa 1–158) was PCR amplified from human cDNA (with the additional codon for glycine after START codon) and cloned into the BamHI-XhoI sites of pETM30. Sequence coding for ANTH domain of Yap1802 (aa 1–272) was PCR amplified from yeast gDNA and cloned into the NcoI-XhoI sites of pETM30.

### Protein production and purification

Recombinant human Hip1R ANTH, human ENTH and the yeast Yap1802 ANTH domains were expressed in E. coli BL21 DE3 (Novagen) as GST fusion proteins containing an N-terminal His-tag followed by a TEV (Hisx6-TEV) cleavage site. Recombinant human ANTH domain from CALM and C. thermophilum ANTH and ENTH domains were expressed in E. coli BL21 DE3 pLYS (Novagen) as N-terminal Hisx6-TEV-tagged proteins. 4 L flasks containing 800 ml cultures in LB media were grown at 37 °C until an optical density (OD = 600) of 1.0. After induction with 0.5 mM IPTG, the cultures were moved to an incubator at 20 °C and harvested after 4 h. Protein expressing cells were harvested by centrifugation (3500 x g for 30 min at 4 °C). The cell pellet was lysed by sonication in the presence of 1 mg/ml DNase (400 K units) in 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5. Lysed cell extract was centrifuged (45,000 x g, 45 min at 4 °C) and supernatant containing His-tagged proteins were purified by nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) purification (Qiagen). Protein was eluted in a final elution buffer of 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole. Excess of TEV protease was added to the imidazole eluted fractions for cleavage of the Hisx6-GST and Hisx6 tags (1 mg/ml TEV per liter of culture). Digestion was performed by dialysis at 4 °C overnight against 5 L of 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 250 mM NaCl and 1 mM DTT. To remove the tags, the dialyzed fractions were subjected to a second Ni-NTA and the flow-through was concentrated to 5 mg/ml to be injected in a size exclusion chromatography (SEC). SEC was performed using an Äkta liquid chromatography system (Amersham Biosciences) and S75 10/300 GL (Tricorn) column (GE Healthcare) in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 and 250 mM NaCl.

### Isothermal titration calorimetry

ITC was performed at 25 °C using MicroCal VP-ITC calorimeter (GE Healthcare). An aliquot of 100 μM ENTH was titrated into 10 μM ANTH contained in the cell. ITC buffers: 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 (for S. cerevisiae ANTH) or 20 mM sodium phosphate pH 8.0 (for ANTHCh) with 250 mM NaCl supplemented with 200 μM PIP2.

### Dynamic light scattering

Measurements have been performed using DynaPro Nanostar (serial no. 323-DPN, Wyatt Technology Corporation). Data have been processed using Dynamics v.7 software. 30 µM protein and PIP2 were mixed and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Samples were filtered through 0.22 µm centrifugal filters (Millipore). The acquisition time was 3 s with a total of 20 acquisitions.

### Crystal structure determination

The ENTH2 domain from S. cerevisiae in complex with PIP2 was prepared with a protein concentration of 6 mg/ml pre-mixed with 200 μM PIP2 and incubated at 4 °C for 2 h. The sample was filtered through 0.22 µm centrifugal filters (Millipore). Protein crystals were obtained by vapor diffusion in a hanging drop setup using Limbro Plates (Hampton Research). For the crystallization drop, 1 μl of the complex was mixed with 1 μl of a mother liquor containing 0.1 M MES, pH 6.5, 0.1 M NaCl, 1.45 M ammonium sulfate. To obtain a complete data set to 3.35 Å resolution, X-ray data from three cryo-cooled crystals soaked in paraffin oil were combined (see Table 1). The ENTH2 domain from S. cerevisiae was crystallized with a protein concentration of 8 mg/ml in a buffer containing 10% (v/v) isopropanol, 20% PEG 4000 and 0.1 M Hepes pH 7.5. The ENTH1 domain from S. cerevisiae was crystallized with a protein concentration of 11 mg/ml in a buffer containing 0.2 M CaCl2, 25% v/v MPD and 0.1 M Tris pH 8.5.

The ENTH1 and ENTH2 domain structures were solved by molecular replacement using PHASER32, with search models of the corresponding domains present in the PDB (Rattus norvegicus ENTH code 1EDU and S. cerevisiae ENTH2 code 4GZC). The structure was refined with REFMAC533 and manually rebuilt with Coot34, and the statistics are reported in Table 1. The ENTH2/PIP2 structure was solved by molecular replacement using the high-resolution structure of ENTH2 determined at 1.8 Å resolution (Table 1). The structure was refined with Phenix35 and manually rebuilt with Coot, resulting in a final Rfactor of 27.9% (Rfree = 30.3%). The stereochemistry was checked with Molprobity36, indicating good overall geometry with only 1.8% of the residues in disallowed regions of the Ramachandran plot. Structure diagrams were prepared with Pymol (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.7.x, Schrödinger, LLC) and Chimera37.

The Sla2 ANTH domain of C. thermophilum (ANTHCh) was crystallized with 0.2 M potassium bromide, 0.1 M Tris pH 7.5, 8% (w/v) PEG 20 K, 8% (w/v) PEG 550 MME. A single, cryo-cooled crystal of ANTHCh diffracted to 1.8 Å at the MASSIF beamline38 and belonged to space group P21 (Table 1). The structure was solved by molecular replacement using a structure prediction from the BAKER-ROSETTA SERVER through the Protein Structure Prediction Center CASP1139 as a search model. A total of 150 in silico designed models that were based on the amino acid sequence of Hip1R were provided by CASP11. One model designed by the Baker-Rosetta team gave a marginal solution, placing two molecules in the asymmetric unit of the P21 crystal form. The CASP model was derived from the CALM crystal structure (PDBID 3ZYM), but it had an RMSD of 2.0 Å for 219 residues when superimposed on the original model. Molecular replacement and model building were performed using PHASER32 and ARPWARP40. Subsequent manual inspection using Coot34 and refinement with REFMAC533 resulted in a refined structure with an Rfactor of 16.7% (Rfree = 22%). The stereochemistry was checked with Molprobity36, indicating good overall geometry with only 0.5% of the residues in disallowed regions of the Ramachandran plot.

### SAXS

Human ENTH hexamer was assembled at 80 µM protein concentration in the presence of 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 250 mM NaCl and 0.2 mM PIP2 and incubated overnight at 4 °C. As a control, 80 µM human ENTH with no PIP2 added was used. Synchrotron radiation X-ray scattering data were collected (EMBL P12, PETRA III, DESY, Germany)41 (Supplementary Table 3) with a PILATUS 2 M pixel detector (DECTRIS, Switzerland) (20 × 0.05 s frames). Solutions of human ENTH (0.4–1.5 mg/ml) were measured through a capillary (20 °C). The sample-to-detector distance was 3.1 m, covering a range of momentum transfer 0.01 ≤ s ≥ 0.46 Å1 (s = 4π sinθ/λ). Frame comparison showed no detectable radiation damage. Data from the detector were normalized, averaged, buffer subtracted, and placed on an absolute scale that is relative to water, according to standard procedures. All data manipulations were performed using PRIMUSqt and the ATSAS software package42. The forward scattering I(0) and radius of gyration, Rg were determined from Guinier analysis: I(s) = I(0)exp(−(sRg)2/3)). The indirect Fourier transform method was applied using the program GNOM43 to obtain the distance distribution function p(r) and the maximum particle dimensions Dmax. Molecular masses (MMs) of solutes were estimated from SAXS data by comparing the extrapolated forward scattering with that of a reference solution of glucose isomerase (Hampton), the hydrated particle/Porod volume Vp, where molecular mass is estimated as 0.588 times Vp, and from the excluded solvent volumes, Vex is obtained from DAMMIF44 through ab initio modeling. Rigid body modeling was performed using the program CORAL42.

### Native mass spectrometry

Prior to native MS analysis45, purified proteins were buffer exchanged to 300 mM ammonium acetate (PN 431311, 99.99% purity, Sigma-Aldrich) and 1 mM DL-dithiothreitol (PN 43815, 99.5% purity, Sigma-Aldrich), pH 8.0, via centrifugal filter units (Vivaspin 500, MWCO 5000 and 10000, Sartorius) at 13,000 x g and 4 °C. Complexes were assembled after buffer exchange by mixing 10 µM ENTH, 10 µM ANTH and 60 µM PIP2 (Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate diC8, Echelon). Thus, soluble PIP2 was used at a submicellar concentration that is in the range of its physiological concentration in the cell46.

ESI capillaries were produced in house. Therefore borosilicate capillaries (1.2 OD, 0.68 ID, World Precision Instruments) were processed in a two-step program with a micropipette puller (P-1000, Sutter instruments) using a squared box filament (2.5 × 2.5 mm, Sutter instruments) and subsequently gold-coated using a sputter coater (Q150R, 40 mA, 200 s, tooling factor of 2.3 and end bleed vacuum of 8 × 10−2 mbar argon, Quorum Technologies).

Native MS on protein complexes was performed on a QToF 2 (Waters and MS Vision) modified for high mass experiments47 with nanoESI source in positive ion mode. The gas pressures were 10 mbar in the source region and 1.1 × 10−2 mbar xenon (purity 5.0) in the collision cell48,49. Mass spectra were recorded with applied voltages for capillary, cone, and collision of 1.35 kV, 120–150 V, and 30–60 V, respectively, optimized for good resolution and minimal complex dissociation. Complexes were analyzed in MS/MS by ramping collision voltages from 10 to 400 V in order to eject protein subunits. Raw data was calibrated with 25 mg/ml cesium iodide spectra of the same day with the software MassLynx (Waters). MassLynx and Massign50 were used to assign peak series to protein species.

Lipid binding was studied on an LCT ESI-ToF system (Waters and MS Vision)47 with direct infusion using the gentlest ionization possible (capillary 1.4 kV, cone 100–120 V, extraction cone 0 V, 6.5 mbar source pressure). Samples were prepared by adding 60 µM PIP2 (Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate diC8, Echelon) to the protein of interest (10 µM). For ENTH domains, cytochrome c from equine heart (PN 129021, Sigma-Aldrich) and for ANTH domains, carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme II from bovine erythrocytes (PN C2522, Sigma-Aldrich) was used as reference protein to test for unspecific clustering as described18. If there was signal overlap of the ENTH or ANTH domain with signal of the PIP2-bound reference protein, this charge state was excluded from the calculation of the ratio of unspecific binding. As an approximation the unspecific binding that was determined using the remaining charge states of the reference protein was subtracted from overlapping signals and the residual signals of the overlapping peaks were considered for further analysis. Relative peak intensities were used to determine the ratio of lipid-bound control protein to non-bound control protein. This ratio was used to correct peak intensities and visualize the data using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software). Cooperativity of the two binding sites was assessed by reviewing the mathematical relation of microscopic (binding site) and macroscopic (apparent) dissociation constants of independent binding sites (see Fig. 1c). As shown in20 these are related by:

$$K_{\rm{D,1}} = \frac{{k_{\rm{d,1}} \times k_{\rm{d,2}}}}{{k_{\rm{d,1}} + k_{\rm{d,2}}}}$$
(1)
$$K_{\rm{D,2}} = k_{\rm{d,1}} + k_{\rm{d,2}}$$
(2)

A lack of microscopic constants kd,1 and kd,2 fulfilling the required condition for macroscopic constants is an indication for dependence of PIP2-binding sites. Macroscopic dissociation constants in the same order of magnitude for both binding events suggest positive cooperativity.

All errors given for native MS data refer to the standard deviation and were based on at least three independent measurements.

### Yeast strain and plasmids

Yeast strain MKY0764 (MATa, his3Δ200, leu2-3,112, ura3-52, lys2-801, sla2:natNT2) was transformed by pRS416-based centromeric plasmid12 expressing indicated variants of Sla2 aa 1–360 fragments51 (generated by overlapping PCR with mutagenic primers). The expression levels of protein constructs were assessed by immunoblotting with anti-HA antibodies (Covance MMS-101R) at 1:1000 dilution. The secondary antibody used was anti-mouse HRP conjugate (BIO-RAD, 1706516) at 1:3000 dilution.

### Data availability

The atomic coordinates for the ENTH2/PIPI2 complex (PDBID 5ON7), the ENTH1 structure (PDBID 5ONF), and the ENTH2 structure (PDBID 6ENR) from the S. cerevisiae as well as the Sla2 structure from C. thermophilum (PDBID 5OO7) are deposited at the Protein Data Bank. Other data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## References

1. 1.

McMahon, H. T. & Boucrot, E. Membrane curvature at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 128, 1065–1070 (2015).

2. 2.

Merrifield, C. J. & Kaksonen, M. Endocytic accessory factors and regulation of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 6, a016733 (2014).

3. 3.

Ferguson, S. M. & De Camilli, P. Dynamin, a membrane-remodelling GTPase. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 75–88 (2012).

4. 4.

Kirchhausen, T., Owen, D. & Harrison, S. C. Molecular structure, function, and dynamics of clathrin-mediated membrane traffic. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 6, a016725 (2014).

5. 5.

Ford, M. G. J. et al. Curvature of clathrin-coated pits driven by epsin. Nature 419, 361–366 (2002).

6. 6.

Ford, M. G. et al. Simultaneous binding of PtdIns(4,5)P2 and clathrin by AP180 in the nucleation of clathrin lattices on membranes. Science 291, 1051–1055 (2001).

7. 7.

Jackson, L. P. et al. A large-scale conformational change couples membrane recruitment to cargo binding in the AP2 clathrin adaptor complex. Cell 141, 1220–1229 (2010).

8. 8.

Itoh, T. et al. Role of the ENTH domain in phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate binding and endocytosis. Science 291, 1047–1051 (2001).

9. 9.

Miller, S. E. et al. CALM regulates clathrin-coated vesicle size and maturation by directly sensing and driving membrane curvature. Dev. Cell 33, 163–175 (2015).

10. 10.

Kozlov, M. M. et al. Mechanisms shaping cell membranes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 29, 53–60 (2014).

11. 11.

Stachowiak, J. C. et al. Membrane bending by protein-protein crowding. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 944–949 (2012).

12. 12.

Skruzny, M. et al. Molecular basis for coupling the plasma membrane to the actin cytoskeleton during clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2533–E2542 (2012).

13. 13.

Messa, M. et al. Epsin deficiency impairs endocytosis by stalling the actin-dependent invagination of endocytic clathrin-coated pits. eLife 3, e03311 (2014).

14. 14.

Skruzny, M. et al. An organized co-assembly of clathrin adaptors is essential for endocytosis. Dev. Cell 33, 150–162 (2015).

15. 15.

Boulant, S., Kural, C., Zeeh, J.-C., Ubelmann, F. & Kirchhausen, T. Actin dynamics counteract membrane tension during clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 1124–1131 (2011).

16. 16.

Erba, E. B. & Zenobi, R. Mass spectrometric studies of dissociation constants of noncovalent complexes. Annu Rep. Prog. Chem. C Phys. Chem. 107, 199–228 (2011).

17. 17.

Leney, A. C. & Heck, A. J. R. Native mass spectrometry: what is in the name? J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 28, 5–13 (2017).

18. 18.

Sun, J., Kitova, E. N., Wang, W. & Klassen, J. S. Method for distinguishing specific from nonspecific protein-ligand complexes in nanoelectrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 78, 3010–3018 (2006).

19. 19.

Kitova, E. N., El-Hawiet, A., Schnier, P. D. & Klassen, J. S. Reliable determinations of protein–ligand interactions by direct esi-ms measurements. are we there yet? J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 23, 431–441 (2012).

20. 20.

Klotz, I. M. Ligand–receptor interactions: facts and fantasies. Q. Rev. Biophys. 18, 227 (1985).

21. 21.

Brady, R. J., Damer, C. K., Heuser, J. E. & O’Halloran, T. J. Regulation of Hip1r by epsin controls the temporal and spatial coupling of actin filaments to clathrin-coated pits. J. Cell Sci. 123, 3652–3661 (2010).

22. 22.

Aguilar, R. C. et al. Epsin N-terminal homology domains perform an essential function regulating Cdc42 through binding Cdc42 GTPase-activating proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 4116–4121 (2006).

23. 23.

Brady, R. J., Wen, Y. & O’Halloran, T. J. The ENTH and C-terminal domains of Dictyostelium epsin cooperate to regulate the dynamic interaction with clathrin-coated pits. J. Cell Sci. 121, 3433–3444 (2008).

24. 24.

Krissinel, E. Stock-based detection of protein oligomeric states in jsPISA. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W314–W319 (2015).

25. 25.

Yoon, Y. et al. Molecular basis of the potent membrane-remodeling activity of the epsin 1 N-terminal homology domain. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 531–540 (2010).

26. 26.

Cocucci, E., Aguet, F., Boulant, S. & Kirchhausen, T. The first five seconds in the life of a clathrin-coated pit. Cell 150, 495–507 (2012).

27. 27.

Raucher, D. et al. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate functions as a second messenger that regulates Cytoskeleton–Plasma membrane adhesion. Cell 100, 221–228 (2000).

28. 28.

Gupta, K. et al. The role of interfacial lipids in stabilizing membrane protein oligomers. Nature 541, 421–424 (2017).

29. 29.

Boucrot, E. et al. Membrane fission is promoted by insertion of amphipathic helices and is restricted by crescent BAR domains. Cell 149, 124–136 (2012).

30. 30.

Busch, D. J. et al. Intrinsically disordered proteins drive membrane curvature. Nat. Commun. 6, 7875 (2015).

31. 31.

Bock, T. et al. An integrated approach for genome annotation of the eukaryotic thermophile chaetomium thermophilum. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 13525–13533 (2014).

32. 32.

Bunkóczi, G. et al. Phaser.MRage: automated molecular replacement. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 69, 2276–2286 (2013).

33. 33.

Winn, M. D., Murshudov, G. N. & Papiz, M. Z. Macromolecular TLS refinement in REFMAC at moderate resolutions. Methods Enzymol. 374, 300–321 (2003).

34. 34.

Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).

35. 35.

Afonine, P. V. et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 68, 352–367 (2012).

36. 36.

Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 (2010).

37. 37.

Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

38. 38.

Nurizzo, D. et al. RoboDiff: combining a sample changer and goniometer for highly automated macromolecular crystallography experiments. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 72, 966–975 (2016).

39. 39.

Kryshtafovych, A., Krysko, O., Daniluk, P., Dmytriv, Z. & Fidelis, K. Protein structure prediction center in CASP8. Proteins 77, 5–9 (2009). Suppl 9.

40. 40.

Langer, G. G., Hazledine, S., Wiegels, T., Carolan, C. & Lamzin, V. S. Visual automated macromolecular model building. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 69, 635–641 (2013).

41. 41.

Blanchet, C. E. et al. Versatile sample environments and automation for biological solution X-ray scattering experiments at the P12 beamline (PETRA III, DESY). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 48, 431–443 (2015).

42. 42.

Petoukhov, M. V. et al. New developments in the ATSAS program package for small-angle scattering data analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 45, 342–350 (2012).

43. 43.

Semenyuk, A. V. & Svergun, D. I. GNOM – a program package for small-angle scattering data processing. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 537–540 (1991).

44. 44.

Franke, D. & Svergun, D. I. DAMMIF, a program for rapid ab-initio shape determination in small-angle scattering. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 42, 342–346 (2009).

45. 45.

Lorenzen, K. & van Duijn, E. in Current Protocols in Protein Science (eds Coligan, J. E., Dunn, B. M., Speicher, D. W. & Wingfield, P. T.) 17.12.1–17.12.17 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2010).

46. 46.

Gamper, N. & Shapiro, M. S. Target-specific PIP 2 signalling: how might it work?: Target-specific PIP 2 signalling. J. Physiol. 582, 967–975 (2007).

47. 47.

van den Heuvel, R. H. H. et al. Improving the performance of a quadrupole time-of-flight instrument for macromolecular mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 78, 7473–7483 (2006).

48. 48.

Lorenzen, K., Versluis, C., van Duijn, E., van den Heuvel, R. H. H. & Heck, A. J. R. Optimizing macromolecular tandem mass spectrometry of large non-covalent complexes using heavy collision gases. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 268, 198–206 (2007).

49. 49.

Tahallah, N., Pinkse, M., Maier, C. S. & Heck, A. J. R. The effect of the source pressure on the abundance of ions of noncovalent protein assemblies in an electrospray ionization orthogonal time-of-flight instrument. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 15, 596–601 (2001).

50. 50.

Morgner, N. & Robinson, C. V. Massign: an assignment strategy for maximizing information from the mass spectra of heterogeneous protein assemblies. Anal. Chem. 84, 2939–2948 (2012).

51. 51.

Sun, Y., Carroll, S., Kaksonen, M., Toshima, J. Y. & Drubin, D. G. PtdIns(4,5)P2 turnover is required for multiple stages during clathrin- and actin-dependent endocytic internalization. J. Cell Biol. 177, 355–367 (2007).

## Acknowledgements

We thank Rob Smock, Daniel Lietha, and Michel Koch for useful comments on the manuscript. We acknowledge the staff of the EMBL beamlines P12 and P14 as well as the MASSIF beamline at the ESRF, and the sample preparation and characterization (SPC) facility of EMBL at PETRA III (DESY, Hamburg) for assistance. M.G.-A. and A.G. were supported by the EMBL Interdisciplinary Postdoc Program (EIPOD) under Marie Curie COFUND actions. The Heinrich Pette Institute, Leibniz Institute for Experimental Virology is supported by the Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg and the Federal Ministry of Health. J.H. and C.U. are funded by the Leibniz Association through SAW-2014-HPI-4 grant. M.K. is funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (31003A_163267).

## Author information

R.M. conceived the work together with C.U. and M.K. M.G.-A. produced proteins and samples for crystallization, SAXS, and native mass spectrometry, determined the Sla2 ANTH crystal structure, designed and performed biophysical experiments, and interpreted data. J.H. performed mass spectrometry experiments and interpreted the data together with C.U. M.S. performed growth experiments in S. cerevisiae. A.G. produced proteins for native mass spectrometry and the ENTH1 and ENTH2/PIP2 crystals. H.D.T.M. performed SAXS analysis and interpreted the data together with D.I.S. R.M. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence to Charlotte Uetrecht or Rob Meijers.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions