Atomically dispersed hybrid nickel-iridium sites for photoelectrocatalysis

Abstract

Atomically dispersed supported catalysts can maximize atom efficiency and minimize cost. In spite of much progress in gas-phase catalysis, applying such catalysts in the field of renewable energy coupled with electrochemistry remains a challenge due to their limited durability in electrolyte. Here, we report a robust and atomically dispersed hybrid catalyst formed in situ on a hematite semiconductor support during photoelectrochemical oxygen evolution by electrostatic adsorption of soluble monomeric [Ir(OH)6]2− coupled to positively charged NiOx sites. The alkali-stable [Ir(OH)6]2− features synergistically enhanced activity toward water oxidation through NiOx that acts as a “movable bridge” of charge transfer from the hematite surface to the single iridium center. This hybrid catalyst sustains high performance and stability in alkaline electrolyte for >80 h of operation. Our findings provide a promising path for soluble catalysts that are weakly and reversibly bound to semiconductor-supported hole-accumulation inorganic materials under catalytic reaction conditions as hybrid active sites for photoelectrocatalysis.

Introduction

During the past decade, atomically dispersed supported catalysts with 100% exposure of catalytic sites to reactants have attracted increasing research interest and triggered industrial applications1,2, but are rarely exploited for electrocatalysis at solid–liquid interfaces owing to their limited stability3,4,5,6. One of the harshest reactions in converting solar energy into chemical fuels is the photoelectrochemical oxidation of water to oxygen7. This catalytic process needs a bi-component device with a semiconductor photoabsorber that transfers holes to a robust catalyst for oxidizing water8,9. However, there has been limited success in immobilizing atomic-scale inorganic materials and/or molecular complexes on cheap semiconductor supports for a long-term reaction, especially in alkaline electrolyte with a reduced energy loss for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER)10,11. Precious metal oxides, such as IrOx, are superior OER catalysts but their cluster-type or monolayer structures are prone to hydroxylation and thus become soluble/detachable in alkaline electrolytes12,13,14,15,16. For highly active molecular catalysts grafted on semiconductor supports, the practical operating potential required to drive OER can cleave the organic ligands and lead to the formation of deactivated metal oxide nanoparticles or soluble metal hydroxide species17,18. Thus, immobilizing a soluble catalyst directly under OER conditions might present an attractive solution, but some critical issues still remain unresolved19,20,21,22—how to bridge the communication between soluble catalyst species and semiconductor surfaces, and how to stabilize the performance and integrity of such a system over an extended time scale.

Here, we report on a hybrid OER catalyst that contains supported sublayer MOx sites (M = Fe, Cu, Co, Ni, and Ti) and soluble monomeric hexahydroxyiridate (IV) [Ir(OH)6]2− anions (Ir-anions). As an ideal molecular model, we uncover a close relationship between the hole accumulation capacity of MOx and the enhanced activity of Ir-anions. Among the MOx sites, the NiOx showed the highest capacity of hole accumulation and favorable weak “Fe/Ni–O–Ir” bonds with Ir-anions during OER, allowing the accumulated holes to subsequently transfer to Ir sites for OER. Contrary to the prevailing notion that the redox species in an electrolyte acts as hole scavenger, thus poisoning the OER23,24, we observe that the Ir-anion coupled to hematite supported NiOx (H-NiOx) demonstrates unusual OER activity enhancement with a turnover frequency of 2.4–12.7 s−1 per Ir site at 1.23 V RHE (Supplementary Note 1). This hybrid catalyst demonstrates superior stability in strong alkaline electrolytes (even 4.0 M NaOH) for >80 h. It combines the advantages of soluble molecular catalysts with fully exposed active sites and the benefits of solid-state materials with unique physicochemical properties, bridging the gap between heterogeneous and homogeneous catalysts.

Results

Catalyst loading

Nanostructured hematite was applied as a support for catalyst loading (Supplementary Fig. 1). In order to avoid the influence of foreign metals on the surface properties, no extrinsic doping was intentionally introduced into the hematite (Supplementary Note 2). The MOx was loaded onto the hematite through a facile transient electroreduction of metal cations to metallic sites (Supplementary Fig. 2) (see Methods section). Controlling the charge going through the circuit manipulates the amount of metal atoms loaded onto the surface. For instance, Ni is electrodeposited at −1.1 V vs. Ag/AgCl with a charge density of 0.2 mC cm−2 (hereinafter geometric area), which corresponds to 1.0 nmol cm−2, leading to ~6.2 atoms per nm2. The spontaneous oxidation of Ni in air generates H-NiOx (Supplementary Fig. 3).

Unlike in the established methods for molecular catalyst loading, where pre-anchoring is required18, the soluble Ir-anion couples to H-NiOx sites in situ during the OER at 1.23 V RHE under AM 1.5 illumination in a photoelectrochemical (PEC) cell (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 4). The photo-excited holes reach the surface where the positive charges generate an electric field that attracts the negatively charged Ir-anions. When the measured photocurrent plateau is reached, we assume that the Ir-anion approaches an adsorption/desorption equilibrium, after which the loading of Ir on hematite reaches 0.3–1.6 atoms per nm2 (9.5–51.0 ng cm−2 Ir) (Supplementary Note 1). Note that the non-adsorbed Ir-anion in the electrolyte is not consumed and thus recyclable.

Fig. 1
figure1

Synthesis and HAADF STEM images. a Schematic illustration of the preparation process at 1.23 V RHE under AM 1.5 illumination in an electrolyte containing 1.0 M NaOH and 1.0 µM Ir-anion. b High-resolution HAADF STEM image of the hematite-supported catalyst and c Ni EDX mapping. Scale bar, 2 nm. d Isolated Ir atoms exemplarily indicated by circles are dispersed on the hematite. Scale bar, 1 nm

Site structure and catalysis

To identify the atomically dispersed site motifs, the dispersion of the resulting supported H-NiOx/Ir-anion hybrid was characterized by scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) in combination with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Individual Ir atoms were imaged using atomic resolution high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) STEM. This technique offers Z-contrast conditions, i.e., the image intensity is roughly proportional to Z 1.6Z 1.9, where Z is the atomic number of the present element (see Methods section). Therefore, the image contrast of Ir (Z = 77) strongly exceeds that of Fe (Z = 26) and Ni (Z = 28), which allows imaging of individual Ir atoms on a selected thin hematite region. Individual Ir atoms (exemplarily indicated by circles) are clearly separate on the hematite surface and show no indication of agglomeration or clustering in Fig. 1d in contrast to the Ir-free images (Supplementary Fig. 5). Figure 1c is a composite of an HAADF STEM image and a Ni EDX map that shows a homogeneous dispersion of Ni on the hematite substrate (Fig. 1b).

To assess how the mass transfer of Ir-anion influences the OER activity, two methods were carried out to prepare the Ir-anion-containing electrolytes (Supplementary Fig. 6). The first test was performed in 10 mL of homogeneous electrolyte containing 1.0 M NaOH and 1.0 µM Ir-anion (10 nmol Ir in total). The photocurrent density takes >1000 s to reach the plateau. The second method consisted of dripping an identical amount of Ir-anion solution into the 1.0 M NaOH at a close distance, about 0.5 cm away from the H-NiOx electrode. The photocurrent increased suddenly to a maximum value and then started to decrease slowly as the momentary high concentration of Ir-anion close to the H-NiOx electrode gradually diluted to a homogeneous electrolyte. This result indicates that the adsorption/desorption equilibrium is concentration-dependent and that only adsorbed Ir-anions can take part in the OER.

Next, we evaluated the adsorption limitation of Ir-anions to the H-NiOx, with a fixed Ni loading of 1.0 nmol cm−2. Different concentrations of Ir-anion were chosen to maximize the catalyst’s activity. The H-NiOx photoanode in 1.0 M NaOH at 1.23 V RHE exhibits a steady-state photocurrent density of 0.09 ± 0.018 mA cm−2 upon switching on the light (Fig. 2a, blue region). After about 100 s, 5 µL of pre-prepared Ir-anion solution (1.0 M NaOH containing 0.1 mM Ir-anion) was dripped into the 10 mL 1.0 M NaOH electrolyte for the formation of a 0.05 µM Ir-anion solution. The photocurrent density increased to 0.17 mA cm−2 and then stabilized. A stepwise increase of Ir-anion concentration further enhances the photocurrent density until the Ir-anion concentration reaches about 2.0 µM (Fig. 2a, white region). This result is consistent with the variation of the surface Ir loading, where the surface Ir/Ni ratio increases slowly above 2.0 µM Ir-anion concentration (Supplementary Fig. 3). Ir-anion solution of 1.0 µM represents a good balance of cost-efficiency and high activity and was therefore selected for the following experiments. A chopped light illumination of the red region of Fig. 2a confirms that the enhanced photocurrent density resulted from light irradiation. This activity enhancement of Ir-anion on H-NiOx relative to bare hematite agrees with the OER polarization curves (Supplementary Fig. 7). A decent activity enhancement was observed after the introduction of Ni/Ir hybrid catalyst on Sn-doped hematite. A considerable increase of the photocurrent density and a significant negative shift ~200 mV of the onset potential was observed, indicating increased reaction kinetics for water oxidation in Fig. 3a. The enhanced catalytic OER activity was confirmed on a dark F-doped SnO2 (FTO) electrode in Fig. 3b.

Fig. 2
figure2

Photoelectrochemical tests. a OER activity of the H-NiOx/Ir-anion with a stepwise increase of Ir-anion solution concentration. b MOx-modified hematite exhibits significant activity difference (Δj) upon dripping the Ir-anion-containing solution. c The correlation between the hole accumulation capacity of H-MOx before the addition of Ir-anion (Supplementary Fig. 9) and the activity difference Δj after the introduction of 1.0 µM Ir-anion relative to the Ir-anion-free electrolytes. The gray arrow shows the decreased capacity of H-NiOx from 0.64 to 0.35 mC cm−2 (gray square) after the introduction of Ir-anion to the electrolyte. Error bars represent the standard deviation. d Proposed reaction paths explaining the different roles of TiOx and NiOx for the OER

Fig. 3
figure3

Catalytic jV activity. a Linear sweep voltammograms (LSV) on Sn-doped hematite photoelectrodes under AM 1.5 irradiation and b dark FTO electrode at 10 mV s−1 in 1.0 M NaOH

Reaction mechanism

To uncover the interplay between NiOx and Ir-anions and to understand the role of NiOx sites, we screened a series of MOx loadings with different metal ions (Fig. 2b). After dripping of an Ir-anion solution under stirring, an immediate and distinct photocurrent density increase was recorded for H-NiOx but only a slight enhancement was tracked for pristine hematite, H-CuOx, and H-CoOx (Fig. 2b, marked with pale color). In contrast, after addition of the Ir-anions, H-TiOx shows a detrimental effect on OER (the surface coverage of TiOx on the hematite is shown in Supplementary Fig. 5—this TiO2 sublayer formed by atomic layer deposition (ALD) is amorphous and has electronic defects that allow hole conduction25). Similar photocurrent decays were previously reported on mesoporous TiO2 23 and W-doped BiVO4 photoanodes24, respectively. A poisoning mechanism was proposed in which the reversible adsorption/desorption of Ir-anion short-circuits the photoanode redox cycle at the interface between the semiconductor and the electrode FTO back contact23.

In the present study, the hematite semiconductor retains the same surface texture and the exposed FTO has no contribution to the activity of Ir-anion (Fig. 3b). The only difference leading to the activity difference is the decorated MOx sites on the hematite surfaces, implying a strong dependence of the catalytic behaviors of Ir-anion on the surface properties of H-MOx (Supplementary Fig. 8). The cluster-sized MOx sites could be hydroxylated and amorphized under turnover in alkaline solution26,27. Notably, although TiOx reduces the OER activity of the Ir-anions, the deposition of NiOx onto H-TiOx for the formation of an H-TiOx/NiOx surface significantly increases the photocurrent again (Fig. 2b). This is direct evidence for a synergistic enhancement effect between the NiOx and the Ir-anions.

Increased kinetics for OER requires a catalyst with an efficient surface hole density as shown in previous studies28,29,30. To assess the hole accumulation on MOx sites, we used a transient photocurrent surface charging–discharging method to evaluate the density of accumulated holes under steady-state conditions during the OER at 1.23 V RHE. As soon as the photocurrent reaches the steady state, the light was switched off to record the cathodic current overshoot, owing to the continuing flux of electrons to the surface sites recombining with remaining holes (Supplementary Fig. 9). The number of the remaining holes describes the hole accumulation capacity of H-MOx (Fig. 2c, open blue square), which is in good agreement with the calculated photocurrent density differences (∆j) of the H-MOx photoanodes (Fig. 2c, open yellow square) derived from Fig. 2b. It is evident that the H-NiOx sites exhibit much higher hole accumulation capacity relative to H-TiOx, thus promoting the four-electron OER process.

Before the accumulated holes can translocate to the soluble Ir-anions, the latter have to be bound to the semiconductor surface long enough to allow the photo-excited surface holes to continuously transfer to the Ir sites for catalysis31,32,33. The in situ formation of at least one “Fe/M–O–Ir” bond allows this continuous hole transfer to the Ir center. H-TiOx is thermodynamically more stable and needs a higher overpotential for the hydroxylation by water as required for the formation of a “Fe/Ti–O–Ir” bond34,35. This makes the modified surface less efficient for transferring four holes to the Ir center for generating one oxygen molecule. Consequently, the Ir-anion is not able to catalyze the OER in the case of TiOx but short-circuits the redox cycle, which was reflected in a decrease of the photocurrent (Fig. 2d, left). In contrast, the formation of “Fe/Ni–O–Ir” is favorable, which is consistent with the Ir-Ni binary surface35, allowing an instant immobilization of Ir-anion (Fig. 2d, bottom). To roughly quantify the possible ratio between NiOx and Ir-anion, different Ni loading was applied to 2 nm thickness of amorphous conformal TiOx-covered hematite (H-2 nm TiOx)—relieving the influence of pristine hematite FeOx sites. The concentration of the Ir-anion was kept at 1.0 µM. The optimal OER activity was achieved when the amount of NiOx was four or more times higher than the immobilized Ir anions based on the HAADF STEM images and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis (see Methods section). Further increasing or decreasing the amount of NiOx leads to decreased OER activity (Supplementary Fig. 10). Thus, we propose that one Ir-anion may bridge one or more surface sites and this process depends on the pH of the solution35,36.

To evidence the hole transfer from the hematite surface to Ir-anion through the NiOx site, cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed on hematite and H-NiOx in the dark (Fig. 4). Without NiOx loading but in the presence of Ir-anions, the overlay of the CV curves of hematite and hematite/Ir-anion shows no detectable difference from 0.8 to 1.6 V RHE, implying no significant charge transfer between the hematite and the Ir-anions (Figs. 4a and 4c). When NiOx was loaded on the hematite, the distinct cathodic peak at 1.55 V RHE of surface iron species was suppressed (Supplementary Fig. 11), substituted by a new cathodic peak at 1.35 V RHE, arising from the NiIII/NiII redox couple on hematite substrate37. Once the Ir-anion was introduced to the electrolyte, the Ni reduction peak at 1.35 V RHE decreased (Fig. 4b), concomitantly with a highly promoted catalytic activity peak (Fig. 4d), reflecting an efficient charge transfer from NiOx to the Ir sites. This result is in agreement with the variation of charge transfer resistance across the catalyst/electrolyte interface evaluated by electrochemical impedance measurements (Supplementary Fig. 12). The pristine hematite did not show any significant resistance change after addition of the Ir-anions, whereas decoration of NiOx on hematite decreased the resistance from 25.8 to 6.3 kΩ, and the subsequent addition of Ir-anions further decreased to 4.6 kΩ, implying the favorable charge transfer from NiOx to Ir sites. Furthermore, the hole accumulation capacity of H-NiOx decreased from 0.64 to 0.35 mC cm−2 after addition of the Ir-anions, (Fig. 2c, gray square), underlining that the Ni species transfers charge to the Ir centers29. These results confirm the continuous hole transfer from the hematite surface to the Ir-anions through the NiOx sites. As an ideal molecular model, the NiOx sites thus serve as “movable bridges” working within the potential region of OER (Fig. 2d, right), thereby improving the OER efficiency.

Fig. 4
figure4

Charge transfer and activity enhancement. a, b Cyclic voltammetry at 50 mV s−1 and c, d linear sweep voltammetry at 10 mV s−1 on pristine hematite and H-NiOx in 1.0 M NaOH in the dark. The concentration of Ir-anion is 1.0 µM

We verified that the evolved bubbles were indeed O2 using gas chromatography (GC). Based on the GC results and the measured photocurrents, the calculated faradaic yield of O2 is around 94% (Supplementary Fig. 13). The incident-photon-to-current efficiency (IPCE) was determined to confirm the promotion of hybrid Ir/Ni catalyst relative to the bare hematite (Supplementary Fig. 13). IPCE values match well the band gap of hematite and drop to zero at wavelengths beyond 600 nm.

Stability test

Furthermore, we evaluated the stability of the H-NiOx in strong alkaline electrolytes (1.0 and 4.0 M NaOH containing 1.0 μM Ir-anion). The H-NiOx demonstrates extremely stable performance in both electrolytes, which makes it a strong candidate as a surface modifier for Ir-anions (Supplementary Fig. 14, gray line). After introducing the Ir-anions, an initial photocurrent increase at the beginning of the operation was attributed to the preferential adsorption of Ir-anions to the H-NiOx surface. After this initial phase, the photocurrent density remains constant, indicating the superior stability (Supplementary Fig. 14, red line) over highly loaded IrOx nanoparticles15. In 4.0 M NaOH, it takes a longer time period until the photocurrent reaches the plateau, probably due to the slower kinetics for the formation of “Fe/Ni–O–Ir” from the pH-dependent dehydroxylation of Ir-anion36.

To assess the stability of the adsorbed/bonded Ir-anions, the H-NiOx photoanode and PEC cell were washed several times after 1 h of operation and freshly prepared NaOH was added to the PEC cell. The photocurrent density decayed slowly with increasing reaction time (Supplementary Fig. 14), suggesting a slow desorption process during the OER. To measure the reversibility of the Ir-anion adsorption/desorption, Ir-anions were again supplied to the electrolyte, which restored the photocurrent to the interrupted value, implying a self-healing feature (Supplementary Fig. 14a).

We also assessed the long-term performance stability in 4.0 M NaOH for >80 h of operation (Fig. 5). A continuous stability test of hybrid Ni/Ir sites over 73 h confirmed the high stability. In between, a chopped light operation with a 20 min interval was performed and the bubbles covering the electrode were removed by mechanically oscillating the electrolyte (inset of Fig. 5). Upon switching on the light, the photocurrent was restored and new bubbles formed gradually. This result corroborates that the hybrid Ni/Ir electrocatalyst satisfies the stability requirements of intermittent solar light illumination.

Fig. 5
figure5

Stability test on H-NiOx. The chronopotentiometric curve obtained with the H-NiOx photoelectrode in 4.0 M NaOH + 1.0 μM Ir-anion at 1.23 V RHE under AM 1.5 illumination. A chopped light operation with 20 min interval was performed after 73 h of continuous stability test. The image of the photoanode window (inset) exhibits a bubble evolution/coverage on the surface of the Ni/Ir-decorated hematite photoanode

The rational design of a reaction condition-stable catalyst that selectively binds to the semiconductor surface sites under operating conditions increases the performance stability. The developed molecular-anchoring process provides a general photoelectrochemical route for synthesizing homogeneously and atomically dispersed, supported catalysts. Moreover, this study provides a promising path to explore new materials and strategies for combined heterogeneous/homogeneous electrocatalysis systems—an efficient and general strategy to employ other soluble molecular metal complexes19 or polyoxometalates38 on solid-state inorganic materials-modified semiconductors for solar-driven water splitting.

Methods

Synthesis of hematite and H-MOx

A nanostructured hematite was applied as a support for catalyst loading. It was prepared by hydrothermal deposition of β-FeOOH nanorods onto FTO glass (FTO, TEC 15 A 3.0 mm, XOP Física glass company) in an aqueous solution containing 0.15 M FeCl3·6H2O (Sigma-Aldrich), and 1.0 M NaNO3 (Sigma-Aldrich) at 95 °C for 1.5 h39. After the reaction, the as-prepared thin films were washed with ethanol/water several times and dried in flowing N2. Then the β-FeOOH thin films were thermally annealed at 600 °C for 2 h in the air leading to the formation of hematite structure. X-ray diffraction and Raman spectra imply the formation of hematite Fe2O3 (Supplementary Fig. 1). Scanning electron microscopy images show a rough surface that allows for catalyst loading (Supplementary Fig. 1).

The MOx loading was achieved through a facile transient electroreduction of metal cations to metallic sites on hematite modified from the reported method40. This electrodeposition was implemented in a weak acidic electrolyte (pH = 4), which allows for a control of the amount of atoms deposited40, avoiding the spontaneous binding of cations on oxide semiconductor surfaces that happen in neutral and alkaline electrolytes. Controlling the charge going through the circuit manipulates the amount of metal atoms loaded onto the surface. For instance, the Ni is electroreduced at −1.1 V vs. Ag/AgCl with a charge density of 0.2 mC cm−2 (geometric area, hereinafter), taking about 0.1 s for the whole deposition (Supplementary Fig. 2). The amount of deposited Ni atoms on hematite corresponds to 1.0 nmol cm−2, leading to ~6.2 atoms per nm2. After electrodeposition, the spontaneous oxidation of Ni in air for ~3 days generates NiOx sites. The main XPS peak positions of Ni2p core level are at 873.5 and 856.0 eV (Supplementary Fig. 3); they are attributed to NiOx sites. CuOx, CoOx, and NiOx sites were equally prepared by this transient electrochemical process. The pristine hematite surface was considered as FeOx sites. TiOx has been deposited on hematite using an ALD system at 120 °C (PICSUN R-200). Tetrakis (dimethylamido)-titanium(IV) (99.999%, Sigma-Aldrich, kept at 85 °C) and H2O were used as Ti and O sources, respectively. Ti precursor was held in the chamber for 1.6 s under 150 sccm nitrogen flow, followed by a 6-s nitrogen purge. H2O was held for 0.1 s under 200 sccm nitrogen flow, followed by a 6-s nitrogen purge. TiOx deposition has been calculated to be 0.50 Å per cycle, determined by ellipsometry on a silicon wafer with a native oxide layer.

Synthesis of H-MOx/Ir-anion

Colorless [Ir(OH)6]−2 solution (0.1 mM) was prepared in 1.0 M NaOH by hydrolysis of K2IrCl6 36. The Ir-anions were electrostatically adsorbed to the positively charged MOx sites during the photoelectrochemical OER at 1.23 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) containing Ir-anions in NaOH electrolyte under AM 1.5 illumination.

Materials characterizations

Material crystal phases of the β-FeOOH and the hematite were confirmed using X-ray diffraction and Raman. The X-ray diffraction studies were carried out in the range of scanning angle 20–70° using an X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation of wavelength 0.154060 nm (D8 Discover). A field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM Zeiss Supra 50 VP) was used to observe the surface morphology and estimate the surface texture. XPS was performed with a polychromatic MgKα (hν = 1253.6 eV) and a mono-chromatized AlKα (hν = 1486.6 eV) source in a modified Vacuum Generators ESCALAB 220 (p < 10−9 mbar)41. The energy scale was calibrated as described in this literature42. STEM studies were performed using an FEI Titan ChemiSTEM operated at 200 kV equipped with a Cs-probe corrector and a HAADF detector. This technique offers Z-contrast conditions, i.e., the image intensity is roughly proportional to Z 1.6Z 1.9,where Z is the atomic number of the present element43,44. “Z-contrast” conditions were achieved using a probe semi-angle of 25 mrad and an inner collection angle of the detector of 70 mrad. Compositional maps were obtained with EDX using four large-solid-angle symmetrical Si drift detectors.

Photoelectrochemical characterizations

Photoelectrochemical performance and the related electrochemical measurements were performed by using an SP-300 Potentiostat (Bio-logic). All measurements were made in alkaline electrolytes (1.0 or 4.0 M NaOH) in a custom-designed Cappuccino Teflon cell with a quartz window (Supplementary Fig. 4). A standard three-electrode setup was applied by using hematite or H-MOx photoelectrodes as the working electrode and platinum gauze as the counter electrode. All the measured potentials are vs. RHE. A 300 W Xenon lamp (LOT-QuantumDesign GmbH, Germany) coupled to a filter (AM 1.5) was used to simulate solar light. The light power density was calibrated to 100 mW cm−2 (AM 1.5) with a Si reference solar cell (LOT-QuantumDesign GmbH, Germany).

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author (C.C.).

References

  1. 1.

    Qiao, B. et al. Single-atom catalysis of CO oxidation using Pt1/FeOx. Nat. Chem. 3, 634–641 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Liu, P. et al. Photochemical route for synthesizing atomically dispersed palladium catalysts. Science 352, 797–800 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zhang, S. et al. Catalysis on singly dispersed bimetallic sites. Nat. Commun. 6, 7938 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. & Gates, B. C. Atomically dispersed supported metal catalysts. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 3, 545–574 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nakamura, R. & Frei, H. Visible light-driven water oxidation by Ir oxide clusters coupled to single Cr centers in mesoporous silica. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 10668–10669 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Choi, C. H. et al. Tuning selectivity of electrochemical reactions by atomically dispersed platinum catalyst. Nat. Commun. 7, 10922 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tachibana, Y., Vayssieres, L. & Durrant, J. R. Artificial photosynthesis for solar water-splitting. Nat. Photonics 6, 511–518 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Montoya, J. H. et al. Materials for solar fuels and chemicals. Nat. Mater. 16, 70–81 (2017).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hunter, B. M., Gray, H. B. & Müller, A. M. Earth-abundant heterogeneous water oxidation catalysts. Chem. Rev. 116, 14120–14136 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Subbaraman, R. et al. Trends in activity for the water electrolyser reactions on 3d M(Ni,Co,Fe,Mn) hydr(oxy)oxide catalysts. Nat. Mater. 11, 550–557 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Vannucci, A. K. et al. Crossing the divide between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis in water oxidation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20918–20922 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Seitz, L. C. et al. A highly active and stable IrOx/SrIrO3 catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction. Science 353, 1011–1014 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    McCrory, C. C. L., Jung, S., Peters, J. C. & Jaramillo, T. F. Benchmarking heterogeneous electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 16977–16987 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nam, Y. S. et al. Biologically templated photocatalytic nanostructures for sustained light-driven water oxidation. Nat. Nano 5, 340–344 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tilley, S. D., Cornuz, M., Sivula, K. & Graetzel, M. Light-induced water splitting with hematite: improved nanostructure and iridium oxide catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 49, 6405–6408 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Oh, H.-S. et al. Electrochemical catalyst–support effects and their stabilizing role for IrOx nanoparticle catalysts during the oxygen evolution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 12552–12563 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Grotjahn, D. B. et al. Evolution of iridium-based molecular catalysts during water oxidation with ceric ammonium nitrate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 19024–19027 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Duan, L., Tong, L., Xu, Y. & Sun, L. Visible light-driven water oxidation-from molecular catalysts to photoelectrochemical cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 3296–3313 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Barnett, S. M., Goldberg, K. I. & Mayer, J. M. A soluble copper–bipyridine water-oxidation electrocatalyst. Nat. Chem. 4, 498–502 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sheehan, S. W. et al. A molecular catalyst for water oxidation that binds to metal oxide surfaces. Nat. Commun. 6, 6469 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Nakagawa, T., Bjorge, N. S. & Murray, R. W. Electrogenerated IrOx nanoparticles as dissolved redox catalysts for water oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 15578–15579 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yin, Q. et al. A fast soluble carbon-free molecular water oxidation catalyst based on abundant metals. Science 328, 342–345 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zhao, Y. et al. Understanding the effect of monomeric Iridium(III/IV) aquo complexes on the photoelectrochemistry of IrOx·nH2O-catalyzed water-splitting systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 8749–8757 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ye, H., Park, H. S. & Bard, A. J. Screening of electrocatalysts for photoelectrochemical water oxidation on W-doped BiVO4 photocatalysts by scanning electrochemical microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 12464–12470 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hu, S. et al. Amorphous TiO2 coatings stabilize Si, GaAs, and GaP photoanodes for efficient water oxidation. Science 344, 1005–1009 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    May, K. J. et al. Influence of oxygen evolution during water oxidation on the surface of perovskite oxide catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3, 3264–3270 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bergmann A., et al. Reversible amorphization and the catalytically active state of crystalline Co3O4 during oxygen evolution. Nat. Commun. 6, 8625 (2015).

  28. 28.

    Le Formal, F. et al. Rate law analysis of water oxidation on a hematite surface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 6629–6637 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wang, Z. et al. Synergetic effect of conjugated Ni(OH)2/IrO2 cocatalyst on titanium-doped hematite photoanode for solar water splitting. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 19607–19612 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lin, F. & Boettcher, S. W. Adaptive semiconductor/electrocatalyst junctions in water-splitting photoanodes. Nat. Mater. 13, 81–86 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhang, C. et al. A synthetic Mn4Ca-cluster mimicking the oxygen-evolving center of photosynthesis. Science 348, 690–693 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Materna, K. L. et al. Heterogenized iridium water-oxidation catalyst from a silatrane precursor. ACS Catal. 6, 5371–5377 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gambardella, A. A., Feldberg, S. W. & Murray, R. W. Electron transfer dynamics of iridium oxide nanoparticles attached to electrodes by self-assembled monolayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 5774–5777 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Li, Y.-F., Liu, Z.-P., Liu, L. & Gao, W. Mechanism and activity of photocatalytic oxygen evolution on titania anatase in aqueous surroundings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 13008–13015 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Reier, T. et al. Molecular insight in structure and activity of highly efficient, low-Ir Ir–Ni oxide catalysts for electrochemical water splitting (OER). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 13031–13040 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhao, Y., Vargas-Barbosa, N. M., Hernandez-Pagan, E. A. & Mallouk, T. E. Anodic deposition of colloidal iridium oxide thin films from hexahydroxyiridate(IV) solutions. Small 7, 2087–2093 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Trotochaud, L., Young, S. L., Ranney, J. K. & Boettcher, S. W. Nickel-iron oxyhydroxide oxygen-evolution electrocatalysts: the role of intentional and incidental iron incorporation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 6744–6753 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Toma, F. M. et al. Efficient water oxidation at carbon nanotube-polyoxometalate electrocatalytic interfaces. Nat. Chem. 2, 826–831 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Vayssieres, L., Beermann, N., Lindquist, S. E. & Hagfeldt, A. Controlled aqueous chemical growth of oriented three-dimensional crystalline nanorod arrays: application to iron(III) oxides. Chem. Mater. 13, 233–235 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hill, J. C., Landers, A. T. & Switzer, J. A. An electrodeposited inhomogeneous metal-insulator-semiconductor junction for efficient photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Nat. Mater. 14, 1150–1155 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Greber, T. et al. A photoelectron spectrometer for k-space mapping above the Fermi level. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68, 4549–4554 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Seah, M. P. Summary of ISO/TC 201 Standard: VII ISO 15472: 2001—surface chemical analysis—X-ray photoelectron spectrometers—calibration of energy scales. Surf. Interface Anal. 31, 721–723 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Hartel, P., Rose, H. & Dinges, C. Conditions and reasons for incoherent imaging in STEM. Ultramicroscopy 63, 93–114 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Nellist, P. D. & Pennycook, S. J. Incoherent imaging using dynamically scattered coherent electrons. Ultramicroscopy 78, 111–124 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

C.C. acknowledges financial support from the University of Zurich, the University Research Priority Program (URPP) “Light to Chemical Energy Conversion” (LightChEC). SEM imaging was performed with the support of the Center for Microscopy and Image Analysis, University of Zurich. C.C. acknowledges Professor C. Li from DICP for valuable discussions during his visit in Zurich. We thank Professor D. Tilley, R. Prabhakar, R. Wick, Dr. H. Liu for sample preparation and characterization assistance, and Dr. C. Richmond for valuable discussions.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.C. conceived and designed the experiments, carried out the experiments, analyzed the results, and wrote the manuscript. M.H. performed the HAADF STEM and EDX measurements and analyzed the results. W.-D.Z. and J.O. contribute to the XPS and element quantification. W.C., B.P., and R.A. contributed to the characterizations and analysis. All authors commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunhua Cui.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, C., Heggen, M., Zabka, W. et al. Atomically dispersed hybrid nickel-iridium sites for photoelectrocatalysis. Nat Commun 8, 1341 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01545-w

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.