Phenotypic differences among species may evolve through genetic accommodation, but mechanisms accounting for this process are poorly understood. Here we compare hormonal variation underlying differences in the timing of metamorphosis among three spadefoot toads with different larval periods and responsiveness to pond drying. We find that, in response to pond drying, Pelobates cultripes and Spea multiplicata accelerate metamorphosis, increase standard metabolic rate (SMR), and elevate whole-body content of thyroid hormone (the primary morphogen controlling metamorphosis) and corticosterone (a stress hormone acting synergistically with thyroid hormone to accelerate metamorphosis). In contrast, Scaphiopus couchii has the shortest larval period, highest whole-body thyroid hormone and corticosterone content, and highest SMR, and these trait values are least affected by pond drying among the three species. Our findings support that the atypically rapid and canalized development of S. couchii evolved by genetic accommodation of endocrine pathways controlling metamorphosis, showing how phenotypic plasticity within species may evolve into trait variation among species.
Phenotypic plasticity is a common property of developing organisms, where a single genotype can give rise to different phenotypes in different environments1. Theoretical, empirical, and laboratory selection approaches indicate that divergent selection, acting on plastic traits, can quickly cause genetic changes in the regulation, expression, and/or frequency of traits among populations within a species, a process known as genetic accommodation1, 2. The possibility that phenotypic differences among species may stem directly from genetic accommodation1, 3, 4 is suggested by examples where differences among species parallel environmentally induced differences among individuals within a related species3,4,5,6. However, how mechanisms of trait regulation evolve during genetic accommodation is poorly understood and of vital importance for elucidating why/how lineages (populations or species) differ in phenotype.
Acceleration of metamorphosis occurs in response to pond drying in many anuran amphibians and is largely dependent upon increased production and action of thyroid hormone (TH; the primary morphogen controlling amphibian metamorphosis) and corticosterone (CORT; a stress hormone that synergizes with TH to promote tissue transformation)7,8,9,10. Exposure to pond drying leads to activation of hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) neurons, and CRH stimulates secretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) by the pituitary gland. Circulating ACTH acts on the interrenal glands and TSH acts on the thyroid glands to stimulate secretion of CORT and TH, respectively. Thus, because treatment with exogenous TH and CORT is known to accelerate metamorphosis in frogs, marked elevation of endogenous TH and CORT levels explains at least in part the developmental acceleration of tadpoles exposed to pond drying7.
Extant spadefoot toad species occupy a range of habitats from arid to semi-arid to deciduous temperate forest and lay eggs in bodies of water with different degrees of permanence, from ephemeral pools to long-lived seasonal ponds11. Adaptations to relative pond permanence are seen in the tadpoles of different spadefoot toad species12, 13. Couch’s spadefoot toad (Scaphiopus couchii) lays eggs in the most ephemeral pools and has the shortest larval period known of all anurans. The Western spadefoot toad (Pelobates cultripes) lays eggs in long lasting pools and has the longest larval period of the three species studied, and the New Mexico spadefoot toad (Spea multiplicata) is intermediate in duration of breeding ponds and in its larval period12, 14. Accelerated metamorphosis and increased TH and CORT content in response to pond drying have been observed in the spadefoot toad species, Spea hammondii (a relative of S. multiplicata) and P. cultripes 9, 15. Further, individuals undergoing stress-induced metamorphosis exhibit morphological consequences of the increased hormone contents, including smaller body size, shorter relative limb length, and reduced levels of abdominal fat16, 17. These morphological changes can also be induced by exogenous treatment with TH and CORT18, 19.
A key observation is that even though S. couchii was described as an example of developmental plasticity in previous literature20, 21, this species has dramatically reduced plasticity compared to P. cultripes 16, 17. Furthermore, in comparison to the other spadefoot species, S. couchii has reduced size at metamorphosis, shorter hind limbs, altered head shape, altered timing of gonad differentiation, and smaller abdominal fat bodies10, 13, 16, 17. These morphological traits are constitutively expressed in S. couchii but observed in P. cultripes and S. multiplicata only when they are exposed to low water levels. Thus, phenotypic differences among species in traits associated with the larval period mirror within-species differences caused by changes in developmental rate induced by pond drying and exogenous hormones. Further, based on phylogenetic character state reconstruction, plasticity in duration of the larval period is ancestral among extant spadefoot toad species, and rapid development in S. couchii is derived16, 22. We therefore hypothesize that species differences in larval period and associated traits evolved through genetic accommodation via altered endocrine regulation.
To test this hypothesis with respect to endocrine regulation, we investigated the mechanistic basis for phenotypic differences among spadefoot toad species that differ in the duration of their larval period and their degree of plasticity in the timing of metamorphosis. We raised tadpoles of three species (S. couchii, P. cultripes and S. multiplicata) in the laboratory, exposed them to simulated pond drying, and measured whole-body TH and CORT content and standard metabolic rate (SMR). We show that species differences in larval period and responsiveness to pond drying are associated with modification of endocrine signaling pathways that control tadpole metamorphosis. Our findings support the hypothesis that altered endocrine signalling from genetic accommodation of larval period duration accounts for the phenotypic differences observed among spadefoot toad species.
Larval period and plasticity differences among species
The evolution of differences in larval period and developmental plasticity among spadefoot toad species provides a clear example of an evolutionary pattern consistent with genetic accommodation (Fig. 1)16, 17, 23. In particular, P. cultripes exhibits significant plasticity in the timing of metamorphosis, as its larval period was shortened by ~40% when exposed to low water conditions (31.4 ± 0.56 [mean ± standard error] days in high water vs. 18.4 ± 0.54 days in low water) (Fig. 1b)13, 16, 17. By contrast, tadpoles of S. couchii, which breed in ephemeral ponds, had a much shorter larval period (6.6 ± 0.16 days in high water) and did not accelerate development when exposed to simulated pond drying (Fig. 1b). The larval period of S. multiplicata was intermediate to S. couchii and P. cultripes and also showed an intermediate plastic response to simulated pond drying (the larval period shortened by ~20%; 9.1 ± 0.28 days in high water vs. 7.2 ± 0.36 days in low water) (Fig. 1b)13, 16, 17. The short larval period with reduced plasticity of S. couchii represents a derived and canalized developmental state16, 22. The divergence of reaction norms among spadefoot toad species is consistent with evolution by genetic accommodation of the timing of metamorphosis driven by selection in ponds with different hydroperiods13, 16, 17.
Differential endocrine responses to simulated pond drying
To investigate a mechanistic (i.e., endocrine) basis for differences among species in developmental timing, we measured whole-body TH and CORT content under high water and low water conditions in tadpoles of the three species. We found that, when matched for developmental stage and raised in high water environments, S. couchii had significantly higher whole-body TH content compared with P. cultripes (3.69 fold difference; F 1,65 = 14.0, p = 0.00039; Fig. 1c), which is consistent with our previous observations10. We were unable to obtain measures of TH for S. multiplicata. Furthermore, P. cultripes tadpoles significantly increased TH in response to decreased water level (F 1,30 = 18.14, p = 0.00019), whereas TH content remained unchanged in S. couchii tadpoles regardless of water level (F 1,35 = 0.15, p = 0.71; Fig. 1c).
As was the case for TH, S. couchii had higher whole-body CORT content compared with P. cultripes and S. multiplicata in the high water level treatment (F 2,62 = 6.12, p = 0.0038) (Fig. 1d). This difference was seen in early prometamorphic (Gosner stage 35) and late prometamorphic (Gosner stage 38) tadpoles, but disappeared at metamorphic climax (Gosner stage 42; Fig. 2a). Similar to the increase in TH in P. cultripes after simulated pond drying, both P. cultripes (F 1,15 = 12.83, p = 0.0027) and S. multiplicata (F 1,18 = 16.04, p = 0.00083) had elevated whole-body CORT content after exposure to low water level; whereas decreased water level did not alter CORT content in S. couchii (F 1,18 = 0.004, p = 0.953) (Fig. 1d). These differences in hormone content in response to low water among these species reflects the fact that P. cultripes and S. multiplicata accelerate development in response to low water but S. couchii does not.
Differences in SMR among species
We also compared SMR among the three spadefoot toad species, because our previous studies supported that developmental acceleration entailed a higher metabolic cost9, 17. Tadpoles that accelerated development displayed reduced abdominal fat17, and higher measures of oxidative stress, likely due to increased lipid catabolism9. Such results would further support the pattern of genetic accommodation where the metabolic state observed in plastic species undergoing accelerated development in drying ponds is commensurate with that of the species with constitutively rapid development. We found a positive correlation between SMR and developmental rate (Fig. 2b). In particular, after controlling for differences in body size, the SMR of the fast-developing S. couchii was 2.9-fold higher than that of S. multiplicata and 10.9-fold higher than that of P. cultripes at early prometamorphosis (Gosner stage 35) (Fig. 2b). Similar results were obtained in late prometamorphosis (Gosner stage 38) and metamorphic climax (Gosner stage 42) (Fig. 2b).
Differential effects of CORT manipulation on SMR
The differences in SMR among species during prometamorphosis paralleled their differences in whole-body CORT content. Because there is evidence that SMR can be directly increased by exogenous CORT in other amphibians like red-legged salamanders (Plethodon shermani)24, we investigated whether experimentally manipulating CORT would influence SMR in spadefoot toads. We found that the SMR of P. cultripes and S. multiplicata was increased after treatment with CORT (p = 0.008 and p = 0.013, respectively, comparing high water vs. high water plus CORT) or exposure to low water (p = 0.009 and p = 0.003, respectively, comparing high water vs. low water) (Fig. 3a). Furthermore, the increase in SMR caused by the low water treatment could be reduced (P. cultripes) or blocked (S. multiplicata) by metyrapone, which inhibits CORT synthesis (Fig. 3a). The pattern of change in SMR matched the whole-body CORT content in P. cultripes and S. multiplicata, where animals from the CORT and low water treatments had significantly higher CORT content than the high water treatment. Also, tadpoles from the metyrapone treatment had a partially blocked low water-induced surge in CORT (Fig. 3b). In contrast, SMR of S. couchii was higher than in the other two species and was unchanged by any of the experimental manipulations (F 3,36 = 0.08, P = 0.97) (Fig. 3a). Exogenous CORT, but not the low water treatment, increased CORT content in S. couchii, and CORT content was unaffected by metyrapone (Fig. 3b). Studies by others showed that non-toxic doses of metyrapone are not always effective at statistically significantly reducing CORT content, but expected CORT-related morphological and physiological effects may still be observed25,26,27. Thus, these results show that SMR is affected by manipulating CORT content, either through exposure to low water or directly by exogenous CORT addition in P. cultripes and S. multiplicata, and that high and invariant SMR in S. couchii is consistent with its constitutive rapid developmental rate.
Here we provide evidence that genetic accommodation of plasticity in the timing of metamorphosis of spadefoot toad species is explained by modification of endocrine signaling pathways. Our key finding is that while species with strong developmental responses to pond drying have corresponding endocrine responses, a species with short larval period has minimal developmental responses (i.e. canalized development) and its endocrine regulation of development reflects an intensified state of one end of the ancestral plasticity. We also found that tadpoles of P. cultripes and S. multiplicata increased their SMR in response to pond drying; whereas, S. couchii tadpoles had a constitutively high SMR that was unaltered by pond drying. The fact that the endocrine and metabolic adjustments to accelerate development in response to pond drying within plastic species (P. cultripes and S. multiplicata) corresponds to the canalized hormonal state of the larval period in S. couchii supports the hypothesis that genetic accommodation is the evolutionary process relating ancestral developmental plasticity to phenotypic divergence among spadefoot toad species.
Genetic accommodation results from natural selection acting on trait regulation (in the present case, endocrine control of postembryonic developmental timing)1. To our knowledge, no studies have quantified selection on larval period in spadefoot toads, but larval period varies among S. couchii sibships, revealing genetic variation upon which selection can act28. Also, the strength of selection in favor of reduced larval period likely differs among species. That is, P. cultripes, whose larval period ranges from 93 to 186 days, breeds in long lasting temporary ponds that eventually dry up in summer; whereas, S. couchii, whose larval period ranges 7–30 days lays eggs in ephemeral desert pools that often dry in < 2 weeks28, 29. Furthermore, despite substantial overlap in breeding ponds, S. couchii often chooses pools that are too ephemeral for S. multiplicata, whose larval period ranges from 12 to 40 days. The exploitation of extremely ephemeral pools by S. couchii represents recurring episodes of stronger selection for rapid development than that experienced by S. multiplicata. Pond duration, rather than terrain aridity, is the most likely environmental factor that has driven the evolution of developmental rate in these species22, 30.
We envision the following evolutionary scenario relating plasticity to phenotypic divergence among spadefoot toad species. First, Old and New World spadefoot toad clades (Pelobates vs. Spea/Scaphiopus) diverged at least by the Early Cretaceous30,31,32, perhaps due to the formation of the Atlantic Ocean 150 million years ago. Plasticity in larval period was present before this split, as it is a common feature of amphibian development, and was retained in both lineages after the split16. Then, ancestors of Scaphiopus and Spea gradually experienced increased pond ephemerality compared with ancestors of Pelobates, but developmental plasticity of their larvae would have enabled them to persist. Because the timing of metamorphosis depends on endocrine signaling, continued selection for short larval periods to survive ephemeral ponds in New World spadefoot toad ancestors resulted in genetic changes that altered pathways controlling hormone production and/or action.
Endocrine regulation of tadpole metamorphosis is complex, and so numerous changes in the endocrine system could have accounted for the short larval period of S. couchii. However, the specific endocrine regulation we observed underlying canalized development in S. couchii compared to its relatives implicates evolution by genetic accommodation. In particular, the endocrine changes and morphological consequences that accompany accelerated development in P. cultripes, such as increased TH and CORT, smaller body size at metamorphosis, shorter hind limb length, and reduced size of the abdominal fat bodies, are constitutive features of the faster developing, derived species (i.e., S. couchii)13, 16, 17. It appears that, since the last common ancestor of S. couchii and the other species, selection stabilized the short larval period phenotype that was previously obtained only by environmental induction.
At a mechanistic level, the rapid development of S. couchii may be explained by the higher tissue content of TH as well as increased sensitivity to TH action, due to higher expression of TH receptors10, 33. Also, reduced plasticity in larval period in S. couchii may be explained by the maintenance of high TH and CORT production at near climax levels throughout the larval period9. Thus, it is possible that selection to achieve short larval periods in ephemeral ponds via high hormone levels in S. couchii may have inadvertently resulted in reduced larval period plasticity as a consequence. A hypothetical alternative evolutionary pathway to achieve short larval periods is that S. couchii could have evolved a short larval period via evolution of rapid tissue transformation with reduced dependence on TH, such that none of the other changes associated with accelerated metamorphosis in plastic species, involving metabolism, limbs, gonads, and fat bodies, would necessarily have been obtained. Our data do not support this idea but rather provide rare endocrine evidence supporting the hypothesis that evolution of phenotypic differences among species occurred through genetic accommodation.
Variation in genome size among the species examined here and the existence of polyphenism in Spea such that its tadpoles may be induced to express an alternative carnivorous morphology had the potential to affect our current results. Genome size differences correlate with differences in larval period among species, such that species with faster development rate had reduced genome sizes22. To our knowledge, there is no known association between the level of plasticity and genome size across species, and this pattern is likely a by-product of selection to achieve faster development via more rapid cell division, also found in insects34. With regard to the expression of the induced carnivorous morphology, S. multiplicata can produce carnivorous tadpoles in response to appropriate environmental cues, including anostracan fairy shrimp and Scaphiopus tadpoles as food35, but omnivore morphs seem to be produced as the default in nature36, Even though carnivore morphs develop faster than omnivore morphs, survival through metamorphosis did not differ between carnivore and omnivore morphs in a pond drying experiment37. In any case, carnivore morphs were not observed in our experiments and thus did not impact the developmental rate or plasticity we observed in Spea. In addition, neither Pelobates nor Scaphiopus are known to produce carnivore morphs. On the other hand, the potential for Spea to produce carnivore morphs could have affected their evolutionary path differently from Scaphiopus, such that Spea would not “need” to develop rapidly, like Scaphiopus, because a faster developing carnivore morph is a developmental option38.
In conclusion, our findings provide essential evidence for a link between the mechanisms controlling developmental plasticity and species phenotypic divergence. Because of their pivotal roles in controlling larval period and developmental plasticity, variation in TH and CORT production and signaling was a key factor in the evolution of larval period and plasticity in spadefoot toads. Our data provide mechanistic support for the hypothesis that selection for shorter larval periods with concomitant reduction in ancestral plasticity in S. couchii accounts for phenotypic divergence among spadefoot toad species.
Obtaining adult spadefoot toads and tadpoles
Adults of S. couchii and S. multiplicata were collected from SE Arizona in the summer of 2010. Adult spadefoot toads were maintained in Cincinnati in screen-covered plastic boxes in 15 cm deep soil, fed ad libitum vitamin-dusted crickets, and sprinkled with water once a week. Two adult pairs from each species were taken to Seville, Spain for the experiments in March 2011. Adults were hormonally stimulated to breed by injecting intraperitoneally once with 20–100 μL of 1 μg/100 μL GnRH agonist (des-Gly10,[D-His(Bzl)6]-luteinizing hormone releasing hormone ethylamide, Sigma)13. Two days after fertilization, tadpoles were transferred to large stock tanks with aeration and fed ad libitum finely powdered rabbit chow twice a day. Pelobates cultripes tadpoles (approx. Gosner stage 3039) were collected from Doñana National Park, Spain in March 2011. Tadpoles from all three species were reared at 25 °C with a 12L/12D cycle until they reached desired Gosner stages. The use of animals in these studies was approved by the University of Cincinnati Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC protocol #06-10-03-01).
Experimental set-up and design
The species studied in this report live in very different natural habitats and thus it was very important to minimize the possibility that any given species was being favoured by the specific experimental setup when comparing effects of water reduction among species. We conducted the water reduction study starting at G35 and at 25 °C based on our previous study17. All tadpoles from a particular species and beginning stage were obtained and exposed to high and low water treatments on the same day. The high water treatment was 2.5 L of water per tank (130 mm water depth) for each species. The low water treatment in the same size tanks was determined by the volume of water required to just submerge the tadpole, and thus depths varied with species-specific tadpole size. Tadpoles were haphazardly assigned to treatments, reared individually, and fed ad libitum finely ground rabbit chow twice daily, and water was changed daily, as per previous studies which showed these rearing conditions were most favorable across species13, 14, 17. Each species is represented by at least three different clutches in each experiment, and specific sample sizes based on our previous studies with these species are provided in the figure legends. The researchers were blind as to the treatment of each specimen or sample at the time of conducting assays. Experiments were not repeated within the study. To study changes in SMR in response to water reduction as well as relation between CORT and SMR in tadpoles, we set up four treatments; tadpoles exposed to (1) high water+ETOH, (2) low water+ETOH, (3) high water+CORT (100 nM), (4) low water+metyrapone (25 μM). Corticosterone and metyrapone both were dissolved in ethanol and thus equal amount of ethanol was added to high and low water treatments to control for vehicle.
Sample collection for hormone measurements
To measure hormone content across species during development, whole tadpoles were collected at G35, 38 and 42 to measure CORT and at G38 and G42 to measure TH from large stock tanks (60 cm H×60 cm W×120 cm L) filled 3/4 full with water. To examine the endocrine response to water reduction treatment, whole tadpoles were collected after 24, 48, and 96 h after the beginning of water reduction treatment and at G38 and G42 (forelimb emergence, FLE) to measure CORT and TH. All tadpoles were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen after removing their intestine within 3 min of capture.
Sample collection for metabolic rate determination
To measure SMR during development, tadpoles from all three species were haphazardly chosen from large stock tanks (60 cm H×60 cm W×120 cm L) filled 3/4 full with water at G32, 35 38 and 42. To examine SMR response to water reduction and CORT manipulation, tadpoles were collected after 4 days to measure the rate of oxygen consumption. We estimated SMR as oxygen consumption at 25 °C using an aquatic respirometer system consisting of ten flow-through cells (plexiglass cylinders, 44 m in diameter×163 mm long cylinders) and twenty optical sensors connected to an oxymeter (Oxy 10-PreSens, Germany). Two sensors flanked each chamber to simultaneously measure oxygen concentration (mg/L) from the inflow and outflow of each chamber. A series of oxygen determinations were obtained every 15 s over the course of 45 min, averaged across the series. We systematically discarded the first 5 min of the data series, considered as acclimation period of the animals to the chambers. SMR values were calculated as VO2 = Vw·∆Cw, where VO2 (µg h−1) is the SMR measured as rate of oxygen consumption, Vw is the water flow rate through the chamber (1 h−1), and ∆Cw is the instantaneous difference in O2 concentration between the inflow and the outflow. All trials were conducted between 09.00 and 14.00 to avoid circadian effects. Upon release from the chambers, tadpoles were blotted dry and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg on a high precision balance (CP324S, Sartorius, Germany). Individual body mass was used as a covariate in all statistical analyses of SMR40, 41. To measure CORT content, separate sets of tadpoles were collected at the same time and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen after removing their intestine within 3 min of capture.
Time in days from beginning of water reduction to FLE was measured to compare plasticity in the rate of metamorphosis across species.
Hormone extraction and measurement
CORT and thyroxine were extracted and measured using radioimmunoassay (RIA) as described previously15, 25, 42, 43. Estimates of whole body hormone content were corrected for recovery and sample volume, and are reported as pg/g*body weight. We euthanized tadpoles by immersion in 0.01% benzocaine, then placed them into 16 × 125 mm borosilicate tubes for snap freezing and storage at −80 °C before hormone extraction. Upon thawing, we removed the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (to eliminate variation in body weight determination due to differences among tadpoles in food and feces content of the GI tract), then recorded body weight for each tadpole. We extracted thyroxine (T4) and CORT from the remaining carcass following methods described by Denver15. Briefly, we homogenized tadpoles in three to four volume of methanol containing 1 mM propylthiouracil (PTU; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). For P. cultripes and S. multiplicata tadpoles we extracted and measured hormone content in individual tadpoles; for S. couchii we pooled three tadpoles per sample owing to their small body size. For P. cultripes and S. couchii we divided the individual homogenates in two for measurement of T4 or CORT. For S. multiplicata we only measured CORT.
For extraction of T4, we first added 1000 cpm of [125I]T4 dissolved in 200 μl methanol (Perkin Elmer: formerly New England Nuclear; NEX111X) to monitor recoveries after extraction. Samples were incubated at room temperature for 15 min, then vortexed on a multitube vortexer for 10 min at room temperature followed by centrifugation at 1300 × g for 20 min at 4°C. The samples were then back-extracted by addition of 5 ml chloroform and 0.5 ml 2 N ammonium hydroxide, followed by vortexing for 15 min at room temperature. Samples were centrifuged at 1300 × g for 20 min at 4°C, then the aqueous phase was removed and applied to an ion-exchange chromatography column (Poly Prep; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) prepared with AG 1 × 2 resin (200–400 mesh; 1.5 ml bed volume; Bio-Rad) in 0.2 M acetate buffer (pH 7). The column was rinsed with alternating application of 0.2 M acetate buffer (pH 7) and 100% ethanol with 1 mM PTU, followed by elution with 70% acetic acid. The samples were dried in a SpeedVac concentrator, then resuspended in 0.5 ml radioimmunoassay buffer (0.11 M sodium barbital buffer, pH 8.6 containing 1 g/L bovine gamma-globulins, Cohn fraction II; Sigma). Fifty microliters of the resuspended sample were removed and counted in a gamma counter (Micromedic) to estimate recovery. We analyzed T4 by RIA as described by MacKenzie et al.44 All samples were analyzed in a single RIA with intra-assay variation less than 10%.
For extraction of CORT, we first added 3000 cpm of [1,2,6,7-3H(N)]CORT (NET399) dissolved in 200 μl methanol to the homogenates to monitor recoveries after extraction. Samples were incubated at room temperature for 15 min, then 5 ml ethyl acetate was added, the samples were vortexed on a multitube vortexer for 10 min at room temperature, and centrifuged at 1300 × g for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatant was dried in a SpeedVac concentrator, and the pellet resuspended in 0.1 ml ethyl acetate for fractionation by thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Samples were loaded on silica gel GF TLC plates (Analtech 250 μM) and the plates placed in a mobile phase of toluene:cyclohexane (1:1). After development, the plates were air-dried and placed in a second mobile phase of chloroform:methanol (98:2). The plates were then air-dried and scanned for radioactivity with a Berthold TLC scanner to locate the [3H]CORT peak. A 1 × 2-cm section of silica from each lane (corresponding to the [3H]CORT peak) was scraped off of the plate into a 16 × 125 mm borosilicate tube, then 5 ml ether was added and the samples incubated overnight at 4 °C. The ether was dried under a stream of nitrogen and the sample re-dissolved in RIA buffer (0.2 M phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7 containing 1% gelatin). We analyzed CORT by RIA as described by Licht et al.45 All samples were analyzed in a single RIA with intra-assay variation < 10%.
All analyses were conducted in R v3.2.1 (R Core Development Team). We used general linear models to test for differences across species, stages and/or experimental treatments on time to metamorphosis, hormone concentration (TH and CORT), and SMR. Species and developmental stage were included as fixed factors in the analyses, and their interaction tested (Supplementary Table 1). Within species, we conducted Fisher’s LSD post hoc tests as needed, using the glht function from the library multcomp. Variables were log-transformed prior to analysis as needed to meet parametric assumptions. Data on time to metamorphosis and SMR showed substantial heteroscedasticity, which was corrected using robust standard errors with the function ‘coeftest’ in library lmtest.
All relevant data are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
West-Eberhard, M. J. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution (Oxford University Press, 2003).
Suzuki, Y. & Nijhout, H. F. Evolution of a polyphenism by genetic accommodation. Science 311, 650–652 (2006).
Pfennig, D. W. et al. Phenotypic plasticity’s impacts on diversification and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 459–467 (2010).
Moczek, A. P. et al. The role of developmental plasticity in evolutionary innovation. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 2705–2713 (2011).
West-Eberhard, M. J. Developmental plasticity and the origin of species differences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6543–6549 (2005).
Moczek, A. P. Developmental capacitance, genetic accommodation, and adaptive evolution. Evol. Dev. 9, 299–305 (2007).
Denver, R. J. in Current Topics in Developmental Biology, Vol. 103 (ed. Yun-Bo, Shi) 195–227 (Academic Press, 2013).
Kulkarni, S. S. & Buchholz, D. R. Beyond synergy: corticosterone and thyroid hormone have numerous interaction effects on gene regulation in Xenopus tropicalis tadpoles. Endocrinology 153, 5309–5324 (2012).
Gomez-Mestre, I., Kulkarni, S. & Buchholz, D. R. Mechanisms and consequences of developmental acceleration in tadpoles responding to pond drying. PLoS ONE 8, e84266 (2013).
Buchholz, D. R. & Hayes, T. B. Variation in thyroid hormone action and tissue content underlies species differences in the timing of metamorphosis in desert frogs. Evol. Dev. 7, 458–467 (2005).
AmphibiaWeb. University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2017. http://www.amphibiaweb.org/ (accessed June 2017).
Morey, S. R. & Reznick, D. A comparative analysis of plasticity in larval development in three species of spadefoot toads. Ecology 81, 1736–1749 (2000).
Buchholz, D. R. & Hayes, T. B. Evolutionary patterns of diversity in spadefoot toad metamorphosis (Anura: Pelobatidae). Copeia 2002, 180–189 (2002).
Buchholz, D. & Hayes, T. B. Larval period comparison for the spadefoot toads Scaphiopus couchii and Spea multiplicata (Pelobatidae: Anura). Herpetologica 56, 455–468 (2000).
Denver, R. J. Hormonal correlates of environmentally induced metamorphosis in the Western spadefoot toad, Scaphiopus hammondii. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 110, 326–336 (1998).
Gomez-Mestre, I. & Buchholz, D. R. Developmental plasticity mirrors differences among taxa in spadefoot toads linking plasticity and diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 19021–19026 (2006).
Kulkarni, S. S., Gomez-Mestre, I., Moskalik, C. L., Storz, B. L. & Buchholz, D. R. Evolutionary reduction of developmental plasticity in desert spadefoot toads. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 2445–2455 (2011).
Dodd, M. & Dodd, J. in Physiology of the Amphibia, Vol. 3 (ed. Lofts, B.) 467–599 (Academic Press, 1976).
Hanke, W. in General, Comparative and Clinical Endocrinology of the Adrenal Cortex, Vol. 2 (eds Jones, I. C. & Henderson, I. W.) 419–495 (Academic Press, 1978).
Newman, R. A. Adaptive plasticity in development of Scaphiopus couchii tadpoles in desert ponds. Evolution 42, 774–783 (1988).
Newman, R. A. Developmental plasticity of Scaphiopus couchii tadpoles in an unpredictable environment. Ecology 70, 1775–1787 (1989).
Zeng, C., Gomez-Mestre, I. & Wiens, J. J. Evolution of rapid development in spadefoot toads is unrelated to arid environments. PLoS ONE 9, e96637 (2014).
Schlichting, C. D. & Wund, M. A. Phenotypic plasticity and epigenetic marking: an assessment of evidence for genetic accommodation. Evolution 68, 656–672 (2014).
Wack, C. L. et al. Elevated plasma corticosterone increases metabolic rate in a terrestrial salamander. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A: Mol. Integr. Physiol. 161, 153–158 (2012).
Hayes, T. B. & Wu, T. H. Interdependence of corticosterone and thyroid hormones in larval toads (Bufo boreas). II. Regulation of corticosterone and thyroid hormones. J. Exp. Zool. 271, 103–111 (1995).
Glennemeier, K. A. & Denver, R. J. Small changes in whole-body corticosterone content affect larval Rana pipiens fitness components. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 127, 16–25 (2002).
Crespi, E. J. & Denver, R. J. Ontogeny of corticotropin-releasing factor effects on locomotion and foraging in the Western spadefoot toad (Spea hammondii). Horm. Behav. 46, 399–410 (2004).
Newman, R. A. Genetic variation for larval anuran (Scaphiopus couchii) development time in an uncertain environment. Evolution 42, 763–773 (1988).
Morey, S. R. & Reznick, D. N. The relationship between habitat permanence and larval development in California spadefoot toads: field and laboratory comparisons of developmental plasticity. Oikos 104, 172–190 (2004).
Chen, J., Bever, G. S., Yi, H.-Y. & Norell, M. A. A burrowing frog from the late Paleocene of Mongolia uncovers a deep history of spadefoot toads (Pelobatoidea) in East Asia. Sci. Rep. 6, 19209 (2016).
Sage, R. D., Prager, E. M. & Wake, D. B. A cretaceous divergence time between pelobatid frogs (Pelobates and Scaphiopus): immunological studies of serum albumin. J. Zool. 198, 481–494 (1982).
Pyron, R. A. & Wiens, J. J. A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 61, 543–583 (2011).
Hollar, A. R., Choi, J., Grimm, A. T. & Buchholz, D. R. Higher thyroid hormone receptor expression correlates with short larval periods in spadefoot toads and increases metamorphic rate. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 173, 190–198 (2011).
Finston, T. L., Hebert, P. D. N. & Foottit, R. B. Genome size variation in aphids. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 25, 189–196 (1995).
Levis, N. A., Serna Buzón, S. & Pfennig, D. W. An inducible offense: carnivore morph tadpoles induced by tadpole carnivory. Ecol. Evol 5, 1405–1411 (2015).
Pfennig, D. The adaptive significance of an environmentally-cued developmental switch in an anuran tadpole. Oecologia 85, 101–107 (1990).
Pfennig, D. W. Polyphenism in spadefoot toad tadpoles as a locally adjusted evolutionarily stable strategy. Evolution 46, 1408–1420 (1992).
Ledon-Rettig, C. C., Pfennig, D. W. & Nascone-Yoder, N. Ancestral variation and the potential for genetic accommodation in larval amphibians: implications for the evolution of novel feeding strategies. Evol. Dev. 10, 316–325 (2008).
Gosner, K. L. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16, 183–190 (1960).
Broggi, J., Hohtola, E., Koivula, K., Orell, M. & Nilsson, J. Long-term repeatability of winter basal metabolic rate and mass in a wild passerine. Funct. Ecol. 23, 768–773 (2009).
Burraco, P., Duarte, L. J. & Gomez-Mestre, I. Predator-induced physiological responses in tadpoles challenged with herbicide pollution. Curr. Zool. 59, 475–484 (2013).
Denver, R. J. & Licht, P. Thyroid hormones act at the level of the pituitary to regulate thyrotropin and growth hormone secretion in hatchling slider turtles (Pseudemys scripta elegans). J. Exp. Zool. 247, 146–154 (1988).
Denver, R. J. Acceleration of anuran amphibian metamorphosis by corticotropin-releasing hormone-like peptides. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 91, 38–51 (1993).
MacKenzie, D. S., Licht, P. & Papkoff, H. Thyrotropin from amphibian (Rana catesbeiana) pituitaries and evidence for heterothyrotropic activity of bullfrog luteinizing hormone in reptiles. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 36, 566–574 (1978).
Licht, P., McCreery, B. R., Barnes, R. & Pang, R. Seasonal and stress related changes in plasma gonadotropins, sex steroids, and corticosterone in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 50, 124–145 (1983).
We thank Arizona Game and Fish Commission (SP565423) and New Mexico Department of Game and Fish (3364) for issuing collecting permits for Scaphiopus couchii. We also thank Dr. David Pfenning for providing us with adult breeding pairs of Spea multiplicata. We also thank the Consejeria de Medio Ambiente from Junta de Andalucia for issuing collecting permits for Pelobates cultripes. Support for this research came from Dissertation Completion Fellowship from the University of Cincinnati and Journal of Experimental Biology Travel Fellowships to SSK (2009 and 2011) and NSF IOS 0950538 to D.R.B. and NSF IOS 0922583 to R.J.D. and grant CGL2014-59206-P from Plan Nacional I+D to I.G.M.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kulkarni, S.S., Denver, R.J., Gomez-Mestre, I. et al. Genetic accommodation via modified endocrine signalling explains phenotypic divergence among spadefoot toad species. Nat Commun 8, 993 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00996-5
Current Biology (2020)
Hormones, developmental plasticity, and adaptive evolution: Endocrine flexibility as a catalyst for ‘plasticity-first’ phenotypic divergence
Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology (2020)
Identification of candidate loci for adaptive phenotypic plasticity in natural populations of spadefoot toads
Ecology and Evolution (2020)
Evolution & Development (2020)
Aquatic Ecology (2020)