The continuous development of total synthesis chemistry has allowed many organic and biomolecules to be produced with known synthetic history–that is, a complete set of step reactions in their synthetic routes. Here, we extend such molecular-level precise reaction routes to nanochemistry, particularly to a seed-mediated synthesis of inorganic nanoparticles. By systematically investigating the time−dependent abundance of 35 intermediate species in total, we map out relevant step reactions in a model size growth reaction from molecularly pure Au25 to Au44 nanoparticles. The size growth of Au nanoparticles involves two different size−evolution processes (monotonic LaMer growth and volcano-shaped aggregative growth), which are driven by a sequential 2-electron boosting of the valence electron count of Au nanoparticles. Such fundamental findings not only provide guiding principles to produce other sizes of Au nanoparticles (e.g., Au38), but also represent molecular-level insights on long-standing puzzles in nanochemistry, including LaMer growth, aggregative growth, and digestive ripening.
Size growth is a ubiquitous observation in synthesis, especially in seed-mediated synthesis of metals, oxides, chalcogenides, and many other nanoparticles (NPs)1, 2. Understanding the mechanism governing size growth is therefore central to the fundamental explorations of NPs. This understanding also largely dictates the ability of rational design and engineering of structural attributes of NPs for practical applications in diverse fields like energy conversion, environmental monitoring, biomedicine, and catalysis. Size growth of the NPs typically involves two mechanisms: LaMer growth3 and aggregative growth4. In a typical LaMer growth, size growth occurs via a heterogeneous nucleation process on pre−formed small NPs (or seed NPs). On the contrary, the aggregative growth depends on agglomeration of primary NPs. Although the success of these theories has fueled the advances of synthetic chemistry of NPs in the past several decades, a lack of molecular-level understanding of growth mechanisms of NPs has become a significant bottleneck in advancing synthetic chemistries, especially in precisely customizing structural attributes of NPs for basic and applied explorations.
Thiolate−protected noble metal (Au or Ag) nanoclusters (NCs) or quantized NPs are a recent discovery of ultrasmall NPs with a core size below 2 nm, which typically possess several to a few hundred metal atoms5,6,7,8,9. They are often referred to as [M n (SR) m ]q, where n, m, and q are numbers of metal atoms (M), thiolate ligands (SR), and net charge, respectively. Due to the strong quantum confinement effect in this ultrasmall size regime, metal NCs exhibit size−dependent molecular-like physicochemical properties, such as HOMO-LUMO transition10, 11, quantized charging12, intrinsic chirality13,14,15, and strong luminescence16,17,18,19. Such size−dependent properties not only make metal NCs useful in catalysis20,21,22,23, bioimaging24, 25, energy conversion26, 27, and sensor development28, 29, but also provide simple and effective ways to monitor the evolution of cluster size30,31,32,33,34. Moreover, tremendous research efforts dedicated to cluster chemistry for the past two decades have enabled the production and characterization of metal NCs with atomic precision35,36,37,38, which is not available for their larger counterparts (NPs > 3 nm or so-called plasmonic NPs). The capability of preparing metal NCs at atomic precision, together with the ease of monitoring cluster size, makes metal NCs an ideal platform to explore size growth mechanisms of nanomaterials with precision at the molecular level.
For example, we recently exemplified a homogeneous-nucleation-growth mechanism of Au NCs by a reductive formation of [Au25(SR)18]− from Au(I) precursors30. A systematic mass spectrometry analysis of the stable NC intermediates and their time−dependent abundance suggests that [Au25(SR)18]− is formed via a two-step process. First, two electron (e−) reduction converts Au(I)-SR complexes into intermediate NC species with even-numbered valence electron count (N* = n−m−q). Second, a size−focusing process of these intermediate NC species finally gives rise to a stable [Au25(SR)18]− species. Several recent studies also successfully revealed the homogenous nucleation mechanism of Au NPs both theoretically and experimentally, suggesting the importance of chemical states and reduction pathways of Au(I) precursors in Au NP synthesis39,40,41,42. While these understandings shed some light on fundamental homogeneous-nucleation-growth of Au NPs (i.e., from Au(I) precursors to stable Au NCs), a similar molecular-level understanding on the equally important heterogeneous-nucleation-growth (i.e., a small Au NC serves as a seed to grow into a larger NC species), is presently lacking. This is possibly due to the difficulty in controlling the growth of NCs at atomic precision while keeping their protecting ligands unaltered.
Herein, we present a molecular-level investigation of size growth mechanism based on a reaction from a molecularly pure [Au25(SR)18]− to a relatively larger [Au44(SR)26]2− species protected by identical thiolate ligands (Fig. 1a), which is made possible in a mildly reductive environment with an appropriate supply of Au(I)-SR complexes. By tracking identifiable intermediate species in the entire course of the size growth reaction, we propose a three−stage size hopping mechanism for the seed-mediated formation of [Au44(SR)26]2−. These three stages are: 0) kinetically dictated accumulation of Au25, I) Au25-mediated size growth, and II) thermodynamically controlled size−focusing. A detailed investigation of the balanced reactions of identified intermediate species further reveals that the growth of Au NCs is driven by boosting of valence electron count either via a monotonic size growth or a volcano-shaped size−evolution pathway. It is also found that the size growth is initiated by adsorption of reductive species (e.g., carbon monoxide or CO in this study) on seed [Au25(SR)18]−. Based on the understandings of Au NC growth, we also extend this seed-mediated growth chemistry to produce other NC intermediates, such as [Au38(SR)24]0, of high quality.
Seed-mediated synthesis of [Au44(SR)26]2− NCs
The model seed cluster used in this study is water-soluble [Au25(p-MBA)18]−, where p-MBA denotes para-mercaptobenzoic acid. The synthesis of [Au25(p-MBA)18]− was conducted according to a reported carbon monoxide (CO)-mediated reduction method30. The as-obtained [Au25(p-MBA)18]− is reddish brown in solution (inset of Fig. 1b) and exhibits characteristic absorptions at 430, 460, 575, 690, and 815 nm30 in ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis, Fig. 1b) absorption spectrum. The electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS, in negative ion mode) spectrum of [Au25(p-MBA)18]− shows 5 sets of peaks in a broad range of m/z = 1000–4000, which are attributed to Au25(p-MBA)18 ions carrying 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, and 7- charges, respectively (Fig. 1d, top spectrum). The detailed assignment of ESI-MS peaks was exemplified by [Au25(p-MBA)18–3 H]4− in the middle and bottom spectra of Fig. 1d. Taken the UV-vis absorption and ESI-MS spectra together, we concluded that a high quality [Au25(p-MBA)18]− was produced by the CO-mediated reduction method.
It has been widely known that [Au25(SR)18]− is stable at mildly oxidative environment43, 44. Therefore, we hypothesized that the size growth of [Au25(SR)18]− should be made possible under a mildly reductive environment in the presence of Au precursors (typically Au(I)-SR complexes). Experimentally, Au(I)-SR complexes were prepared by mixing HAuCl4 and p-MBA with a Au-to-SR ratio of 1:1 at pH 13.0, followed by the addition of purified [Au25(p-MBA)18]− NCs. CO was then bubbled into the reaction mixture for 2 min under vigorous stirring (1000 r.p.m.). After stirring (1000 r.p.m.) for 6 days at room temperature (25 °C), high quality [Au44(p-MBA)26]2− NCs were obtained as dark brown solution (Fig. 1c, inset). In sharp contrast to [Au25(p-MBA)18]−, [Au44(p-MBA)26]2− exhibits only three weak shoulder peaks at 480, 575, and 765 nm in its UV-vis absorption spectrum (Fig. 1c).
ESI-MS (in negative ion mode) was then used to unambiguously determine the molecular formula of product NCs (Fig. 1e). Four sets of peaks at m/z = 1853, 2159, 2529, and 3162 were identified in a broad range of m/z = 1000–4000 (Fig. 1e, top spectrum), corresponding to Au44(p-MBA)26 ions carrying 7-, 6-, 5-, and 4- charges, respectively. All these peaks can be attributed to [Au44(p-MBA)26]2−, which is well supported by the perfect agreement between the simulated and experimental isotope patterns (Fig. 1e, bottom spectra). The isotope analysis together with the cleanness of ESI-MS spectrum (Fig. 1e, top spectrum) suggests a complete size conversion from [Au25(p-MBA)18]− to [Au44(p-MBA)26]2−. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first observation of complete one-to-one size conversion of Au NCs/NPs capped by the same thiolate ligand.
Size growth mechanism from [Au25(SR)18]− to [Au44(SR)26]2−
To shed light on the size growth from [Au25(SR)18]− to [Au44(SR)26]2−, we monitored the reaction process using both UV-vis absorption spectroscopy and ESI-MS. As observed in the time−course UV-vis absorption spectra (Fig. 2), the size growth reaction is apparently divided into three stages. Stage 0 is the “pre−growth stage”, which is initiated by bubbling CO into the reaction mixture (right after t = 0 min), and this stage lasts through the following 1 h (Fig. 2a). At this stage, the most notable optical feature is an enhancement of the characteristic absorption of [Au25(SR)18]− (i.e., at 430, 460, and 690 nm), indicating accumulation of [Au25(SR)18]− by CO reduction of Au(I)-SR complexes. In the following Stage I (t = 1–48 h, Fig. 2b), by stark contrast, the absorption features of [Au25(SR)18]− gradually fade, accompanied by a built-up of absorption features of [Au44(SR)26]2− at 480, 575, and 765 nm. This data suggests that the [Au44(SR)26]2− NCs were formed at the expense of [Au25(SR)18]− NCs at this stage, and this stage is referred to as “size growth stage”. In the last stage (Stage II, t = 48–144 h, Fig. 2c), the absorption features of [Au44(SR)26]2− become better defined, which is in good accordance with a “size-focusing” process36. The distinct color change of reddish brown, to dark reddish brown, brown, and finally to dark brown (insets of Fig. 2) also implied a gradual size conversion from [Au25(SR)18]− to [Au44(SR)26]2−.
Although an apparent bottom-up size growth mechanism was indicated by time−course UV-vis absorption spectroscopy, deeper level understandings of the NC growth are limited. To achieve this, we used ESI-MS to identify stable intermediates during the size conversion. Owing to a slow and readily quenchable reduction kinetics made possible by the mild gaseous reductant CO, we were able to identify a total of 35 Au(I)-SR complex/NC species at isotope resolution in the entire course of size growth reaction from [Au25(SR)18]− to [Au44(SR)26]2− (Figs. 3a, b and Table 1). Zoom-in ESI-MS spectra and the isotope patterns of all these species are included in Figs. 1d, e, and Supplementary Figs. 1−33 in Supplementary Information (SI). These Au(I)-SR complex/NC species can be represented by the universal formula [Au n (SR) m ]q, where their valence electron count can be calculated via the equation: N* = n−m−q. As can be seen in Table 1, these [Au n (SR) m ]q species can be roughly divided into two categories: N* = 0 for Au(I)-SR complex species without a Au(0) core, while N* > 0 for Au NC species with a Au(0) core. More importantly, each identified species in the ESI-MS spectra carries an even number of valence electrons (N* = 0, 2, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 20), which suggests that the clusters grow by 2 e− hopping in size. This finding is similar to our previous observation in the formation of [Au25(SR)18]−, where a 2 e− hopping mechanism was initially attributed to carboxylation-decarboxylation of [Au n (SR) m ]q-CO adducts (denoted as [Au n (SR) m CO]q) featured in the CO-mediated reduction30. It should be pointed out that such 2 e− hopping mechanism has also been observed in other reduction systems, indicating that the root cause of the 2 e− hopping mechanism is the relatively good stability of NC species with even-numbered valence electron count40, 45, 46. However, due to the lack of X-ray structures of most of the intermediate [Au n (SR) m ]q species, the origin of 2 e− hopping mechanism is still under debate and requires further experimental clarification. We also tracked the time-dependent abundance of all 35 [Au n (SR) m ]q species (Fig. 4), and presented below are details of such time-dependent ESI-MS analysis, which clearly suggest a three-stage size hopping mechanism similar to the analysis of UV-vis absorption data.
We first examined the reaction mixture prior to CO reduction (t = 0 min) by ESI-MS. As shown in Fig. 3 (0 min), the predominant species in the reaction mixture are seed [Au25(SR)18]− NCs (N* = 8) and Au(I)-SR complex species with N* = 0 (i.e., species 1–13 formulated as [Au n (SR) n ]0 or [Au n (SR) n+1]− with n ≤ 14). Of note, the reaction mixture seems to be a physical mixture of the as-prepared Au(I)-SR complexes and seed [Au25(SR)18]− NCs (Supplementary Fig. 34 and Supplementary Table 1). This data also suggests that the size growth reaction is necessarily fueled by CO reduction. Before considering the details of Au(I)-SR complex species in the reaction mixture, it should be noted that the chemical identity and solubility of Au(I)-SR complexes could vary with different intrinsic (e.g., R group) and surrounding (e.g., pH, ionic strength, and solvent polarity) conditions. Based on their various identities and structures, Au(I)-SR complexes species would show varied reactivity towards CO reduction, affecting the cluster growth mechanism. As shown in Fig. 4, [Au n (SR) n ]0 with n = 5–14 (most probably adopt ring-like structures30, 47) depleted fast in the 1st h, implying their susceptibility towards CO reduction. In stark contrast, [Au n (SR) n+1]− (n = 1, 2, and 4) with linear structures (two ends capped by thiolate ligands) were less reactive or inert towards CO reduction30, resulting in their persistent survival throughout the entire course of size growth reaction. In addition, a mid-reactive intermediate species towards CO-reduction was identified as [Au4(SR)4]0 (lasting longer than those reactive species but shorter than those inert species), which could be due to its exceedingly stable 8-membered-ring structure. It is also worth noting that, despite the aforementioned [Au25(SR)18]− and Au(I)-SR complex species, minor amounts of other NC species with N* > 0 (e.g., species 14–16 with N* = 2, species 17 with N* = 6, species 19–21 and 23 with N* = 8, and species 24–25 with N* = 10) were also found in the reaction mixture at t = 0. The formation of minor amounts of these NC species (N* > 0) could be attributed to the enhanced reduction power of thiolate ligands at elevated pH (13.0), which could reduce Au(III) to Au(0) by boosting the oxidation state of S to +4 or +648, 49.
CO was bubbled into the reaction mixture at t = 0 min to initiate the size growth. Stage 0 (t = 0–1 h) is the pre-growth stage, which features kinetically dictated accumulation of [Au25(SR)18]− NCs. The most notable changes in this stage are enhancements of the ESI-MS spectral intensities corresponding to [Au25(SR)18]−, accompanied by the diminishing of peaks corresponding to reactive Au(I)-SR complex/NC species (Figs. 3 and 4). These observations corroborate well with the findings in UV-vis absorption analysis, and suggest that the conversion of reactive Au(I)-SR complex/NC species into [Au25(SR)18]− is prompted by CO reduction. Taking both the supreme stability of [Au25(SR)18]− and susceptibility of reactive Au(I)-SR complex species into account, we proposed that CO would first react with reactive Au(I)-SR complexes through a preferential adsorption. As illustrated in Fig. 5a, this preferred reaction is driven by the lower activation energy (E a) of the reactive Au(I)-SR complex species to form [Au n (SR) n CO]0 intermediates over CO complexing with [Au25(SR)18]− (i.e., formation of [Au25(SR)18CO]− intermediate). The reduction could then occur by transferring 2 e− from CO to the complex species via a carboxylation-decarboxylation mechanism30, generating the NC species with N* = 2. Further reduction of these 2 e− NC species into 4 e−, 6 e−, 8 e−, and 10 e− NC species would occur via a similar reduction-growth mechanism. It should be pointed out that we did not capture the 4 e− NC species in our ESI-MS analysis, most probably due to their short lifetime. Since the supreme stability of [Au25(SR)18]− suggests this NC species as a distinctive local minimum in the energy landscape of [Au n (SR) m ]q, the as-formed mixture of [Au n (SR) m ]q with N* ranging from 2 to 10 would ultimately evolve into [Au25(SR)18]− in this stage. In addition to the aforementioned reduction-growth, reactions involved in the size evolution into [Au25(SR)18]− may also include isoelectronic addition, comproportionation, and isoelectronic etching, which are in good agreement with our previous findings30. More details about the proposed size evolution mechanism are included in Supplementary Fig. 35 and Supplementary Notes 1 and 2. In contrast to the formation of [Au25(SR)18]−, the consumption pathway of [Au25(SR)18]− was largely inhibited in this stage due to the relatively higher formation energy obstacle of [Au25(SR)18CO]− (Fig. 5a). The dynamics of formation and consumption reactions of [Au25(SR)18]− thereby gave rise to a kinetic accumulation of [Au25(SR)18]− in this stage.
The successive 1–48 h is Stage I, where a step-wise growth of [Au25(SR)18]− (8 e−) into 10 e− (e.g., [Au28(SR)21]3−), 12 e− (e.g., [Au33(SR)22]− and [Au53(SR)41]0), 14 e− (e.g., [Au37(SR)23]0, [Au38(SR)24]0, [Au40(SR)25]+, and [Au51(SR)38]−), 16 e− (e.g., [Au42(SR)25]+), 18 e− (e.g., [Au43(SR)24]+), and 20 e− (e.g., [Au44(SR)26]2− and [Au46(SR)27]−) NCs occurs. With the depletion of reactive Au(I)-SR complex/NC species and simultaneous accumulation of [Au25(SR)18]− in Stage 0, the remaining CO would extensively associate with [Au25(SR)18]− to form [Au25(SR)18CO]− intermediate at the beginning of this stage. This assertion is experimentally supported by our successful capture of [Au25(SR)18CO]− intermediate by ESI-MS. As shown in Figs. 6a, b, the zoom-in ESI-MS spectrum of the CO-saturated pure [Au25(SR)18]− aqueous solution shows representative peaks of [Au25(SR)18CO]−. The isotope analysis depicted in Fig. 6c further rules out any possible spectral interference from Na+-associated [Au25(SR)18]− NCs, unambiguously corroborating the formation of [Au25(SR)18CO]−. The X-ray crystallography analysis has shown that [Au25(SR)18]− possesses an icosahedral Au13 core10, twelve of whose triangular Au3 facets are capped by the dimeric SR-Au-SR-Au-SR staple-like motifs, leaving eight Au3 facets uncapped. The uncapped Au3 facet from the icosahedral core together with three Au atoms nearby from the dimeric SR-Au-SR-Au-SR motifs could then form a pocket-like cavity, providing reactive sites for reactant adsorption21. Therefore, the formation of [Au25(SR)18CO]− could be attributed to the accommodation of CO in those pocket-like sites, and in turn the strong binding between CO and Au might make CO more susceptible to oxidation. Further growth of NCs hence depends on the reduction of remaining inert Au(I)-SR complex/NC species by the as-formed reactive [Au25(SR)18CO]−. The crucial role of reactive [Au25(SR)18CO]− in the proposed size growth mechanism suggests this stage as “Au25-mediated size-growth”.
The most intriguing finding in the Au25-mediated size−growth stage is a dual-mode size growth pattern (Fig. 5b), which is inherently dictated by the co-existence of less reactive Au(I)-SR complex (e.g., [Au4(SR)5]−) and NC (e.g., [Au18(SR)14]2+) species. The top pathway in Fig. 5b shows a monotonic size growth pattern. This pathway relies on the addition of newly reduced Au(I)-SR complexes on the growing NCs, and thus it could be considered as an analogue of LaMer mechanism. As discussed in Supplementary Note 3, the [Au25(SR)18CO]− could react with [Au4(SR)5]−, leading to the formation of [Au29(SR)23]4− (N* = 10) via the carboxylation-decarboxylation process. The high charge density of [Au29(SR)23]4− would initiate a splitting reaction to generate a more stable [Au28(SR)21]3− species (N* = 10) with a compromised charge density and an ubiquitous [Au(SR)2]− (N* = 0). This regeneration mechanism of [Au28(SR)21]3− was supported by the decreased consumption rate of [Au28(SR)21]3− at the beginning of Stage I. The as-formed 10 e− [Au28(SR)21]3− would subsequently evolve into 12 e− (i.e., [Au33(SR)22]−) → 14 e− (i.e., [Au37(SR)23]0 and [Au38(SR)24]0) → 16 e− (i.e., [Au42(SR)25]+) → 18 e− (i.e., [Au43(SR)24]+) → 20 e− (i.e., [Au44(SR)26]2− and [Au46(SR)27]−) NCs, via the common reduction-growth mechanism. Such a bottom-up step-wise (with a pace of 2 e−) growth process from 8 to 20 e− NC species is supported by the temporal appearance sequence of the corresponding NC species (Fig. 4). Detailed formation and consumption pathways of each identified NC species in this pathway are included in Supplementary Discussion.
In addition to bottom-up LaMer-like growth pathway, Fig. 4 also suggests an alternative volcano-shaped growth pattern, where [Au25(SR)18]− first over-grows into [Au53(SR)41]0 followed by reduction-assisted size-down to [Au44(SR)26]2−. As shown in Fig. 5b (bottom pathway), the size evolution follows a detailed pattern of 8 e− (i.e., [Au25(SR)18]−) → 10 e− (i.e., [Au35(SR)28]3−) → 12 e− (i.e., [Au53(SR)41]0) → 14 e− (i.e., [Au40(SR)25]+ and [Au51(SR)38]−) → 16 e− (i.e., [Au42(SR)25]+) → 18 e− (i.e., [Au43(SR)24]+) → 20 e− (i.e., [Au44(SR)26]2− and [Au46(SR)27]−). Specifically, as depicted in Supplementary Note 4, the [Au25(SR)18CO]− would react with a long Au(I)-SR complex (e.g., [Au10(SR)10]0), giving rise to [Au35(SR)28CO]− (N* = 8) and eventually evolving into [Au35(SR)28]3− (N* = 10) via the aforementioned carboxylation-decarboxylation mechanism. An aggregation reaction could then occur between the freshly formed [Au35(SR)28]3− and a [Au18(SR)14]2+ (N* = 2), yielding a [Au53(SR)41]0 (N* = 12) by ejecting a free SR−. This process resembles the aggregative growth mechanism of NP synthesis, where the agglomeration of primary NPs contributes to the growth of particle size. It is also worth noting that the involvement of long Au(I)-SR complexes in the formation of [Au53(SR)41]0 is indirectly supported by its extraordinarily high SR-to-Au ratio, R SR/Au = 0.77, which is distinctly higher than that of the other 12 e- NC species (e.g., R SR/Au = 0.67 in [Au33(SR)22]−) and close to that of a family of Au(0)@Au(I)-SR NCs (R SR/Au = 0.84) recently reported18. Of note, Au(0)@Au(I)-SR NCs consist of a small Au(0) core, with long Au(I)-SR motifs wrapping on its surface.
The size-down of [Au53(SR)41]0 would then occur via two parallel pathways. In the first pathway (Pathway 1, Supplementary Note 5), a [Au53(SR)41]0 (N* = 12) reacts with a CO to produce a [Au51(SR)38]− (N* = 14) and a ubiquitous [Au2(SR)3]− (N* = 0). Via a similar reduction-assisted size-down reaction, [Au51(SR)38]− (N* = 14) is then able to downgrade to [Au42(SR)25]+ (N* = 16) by releasing a [Au9(SR)9]0 (N* = 0). We rationalize that the reduction-assisted size-down reaction (from [Au53(SR)41]0 to [Au42(SR)25]+) is thermodynamically driven by the fitness of protecting Au(I)-SR motifs to the curvature of Au(0) core of the NCs50, 51. Recent advances in cluster chemistry suggest that long Au(I)-SR motifs could provide better protection to small Au(0) core, as the flexibility of long Au(I)-SR motifs allows them to wrap over the large curvature surface of small Au(0) core without developing significant tension or stress (or vice versa). With the growth of Au(0) core pumped by CO reduction, short Au(I)-SR motifs are preferred by the decreased curvature of Au(0) core, driving the release of long Au(I)-SR motifs (e.g., [Au9(SR)9]0) and formation of more compact Au NCs (e.g., [Au42(SR)25]+). Further size evolution of [Au42(SR)25]+ (N* = 16) into [Au43(SR)24]+ (N* = 18), [Au44(SR)26]2− and [Au46(SR)27]− (N* = 20) species could be readily accomplished via the typical reduction-growth mechanism. In the other parallel pathway (Pathway 2, Supplementary Note 5), the 14 e− NC species formed by size-down of [Au53(SR)41]0 (N* = 12) is [Au40(SR)25]+ in lieu of [Au51(SR)38]−. This is accomplished via a reduction-splitting process. As illustrated in Supplementary Note 5 (Pathway 2), in the presence of ubiquitous Au(I)-SR complexes such as [Au(SR)2]− and [Au4(SR)5]−, [Au53(SR)41]0 would be subsequently reduced by two CO yielding [Au58(SR)42]0 (N* = 16), which is unstable due to its high R SR/Au (0.72) and could rapidly split into [Au40(SR)25]+ (N* = 14) and [Au18(SR)14]2+ (N* = 2). This mechanism is in good accordance with the accumulation of [Au40(SR)25]+ and [Au18(SR)14]2+ at the expense of [Au53(SR)41]0 at the end of Stage I. The growth process of [Au40(SR)25]+ into NCs with higher N* (16 → 18 → 20) has been discussed previously in Pathway 1, Supplementary Note 5. The volcano-shaped size transition could be considered as an analogue of well-known digestive ripening phenomenon in NP synthesis, where large-sized NPs are converted into small-sized ones via a largely unrevealed mechanism. Therefore, our data suggest that boosting of valence electrons of Au NCs (the value of N*) or the number of Au(0) atoms is a driving force for the digestive ripening phenomenon occurring under the reductive environment in the reaction solution.
At the end of Stage I (t = 48 h), [Au44(SR)26]2− has been developed into a predominant species (Figs. 3 and 4), while net formation of other-sized Au NCs has almost ceased (supported by their population concentrations peaking at or before t = 48 h). The thermodynamically controlled size-focusing stage (Stage II) then follows the Au25-mediated size-growth stage (Stage I). In this stage, other sized Au NCs (e.g., [Au40(SR)25]+, [Au43(SR)24]+, and [Au46(SR)27]−) would be converted into [Au44(SR)26]2− via a slow (~4 days) size-focusing process. The survival of [Au44(SR)26]2− is due to its supreme stability over NCs of other sizes, while the slowness of the size-focusing reaction is due to high stability of the residual Au NCs. The dominant reactions involved in this stage are therefore reduction-growth and isoelectronic etching, as exemplified in Supplementary Note 6.
Seed-mediated synthesis of [Au38(SR)24]0
Based on the above understandings on the size growth mechanism, we have a good opportunity to trap the growth of Au NCs into other stable intermediate sizes by a deliberate control over growth kinetics of Au NCs. One target Au NC is [Au38(SR)24]0, whose stability has been well demonstrated in organic solution52,53,54,55. Developments in synthetic chemistry for the past two decades have documented numerous synthetic methods for organic-soluble [Au38(SR)24]0 NCs52,53,54, but the same could not be said for water-soluble [Au38(SR)24]0. By noting [Au38(SR)24]0 (N* = 14) as an important intermediate species in LaMer-like growth of [Au44(SR)26]2− (Fig. 5b), we hypothesized that water-soluble [Au38(SR)24]0 could be produced by concurrently suppressing the aggregative growth pathway of [Au44(SR)26]2− (bottom pathway, Fig. 5b) and bringing down the reducing power in LaMer-like growth pathway. As the volcano-shaped growth in the aggregative growth pathway requires long Au(I)-SR complexes, we thus proposed that a downward shift of Au(I)-SR complex size, which could be made possible via increasing the feeding ratio of SR-to-Au18, would help inhibit the aggregative growth pathway. Regarding the reducing power, we have demonstrated previously that lowering the pH of reaction solution is an effective way to decrease the reducing power of CO. By a combined effect of the elevated SR-to-Au ratio (2:1 vs. 1:1 for [Au44(SR)26]2−) and decreased pH of the reaction solution (12.4 vs. 13.0 for [Au44(SR)26]2−), we have successfully produced atomically precise [Au38(SR)24]0 of high purity (Figs. 7a, b). It is worth pointing out that solely elevating SR-to-Au ratio or tuning down the solution pH could shift the population of product Au NCs downward (Supplementary Figs. 36 and 37), but it was not capable of producing pure [Au38(SR)24]0, highlighting the importance of kinetic control in both LaMer-like growth and aggregative growth. This result is exciting since it evokes the possibility of producing other intermediate NCs by a kinetically trapping method.
Icosahedron-based NC series
During the preparation of this manuscript, we noted that the X-ray structure of [Au44(SR)26]0 (SR = 2,4-dimethylbenzenethiol) has been successfully resolved by Wu and co-workers15. The [Au44(SR)26]0 possesses a Au29 core, which can be regarded as a fused bi-icosahedral Au23 core (similar to the core of [Au38(SR)24]0) capped at the bottom with a boat-like Au6 module. The Au29 core is protected by three monomeric SR-Au-SR motifs at the bottom and six dimeric SR-Au-SR-Au-SR motifs at the top and waist. As the UV-vis absorption spectra of [Au44(SR)26]0 and [Au44(SR)26]2− share a similar envelope with several minor differences (less distinct and red-shifted absorption features in the latter), [Au44(SR)26]2− should share a similar Au44S26 (most probably with a slight twist in Au29 core caused by 2 e− core charge) frame with [Au44(SR)26]0. To further confirm this point, we simulated the optical absorption spectrum of [Au44(SR)26]2− based on the experimental structure of [Au44(SR)26]0 but for a dianion charge state with density functional theory (DFT) structure optimization. The time-dependent DFT (TDDFT) simulation at the B3LYP level yielded a spectrum (Supplementary Fig. 38) showing several distinct bands in reasonable agreement with the experiment; the differences between the simulation and the experimental results could be due to simplified functional and basis set, and different ligands (-SCH3 used for –SR) used in our simulation. We also computed the TDDFT spectrum of the neutral [Au44(SR)26]0 (Supplementary Fig. 38), whose worse agreement with experiment supported the 2- charge state in as-obtained Au44 NCs.
The available structure model for [Au44(SR)26]2− (20 e−) now allows us to compute its relative stability to [Au25(SR)18]− (8 e−). By constructing a Hess reaction of two [Au25(SR)18]− clusters (16 e−) reduced by two CO molecules (4 e−) to form a [Au44(SR)26]2− (20 e−) in an aqueous solution, we found that the reaction has an energetic change of −200 kcal per mol of [Au25(SR)18]−, indicating that [Au44(SR)26]2− is indeed more stable than [Au25(SR)18]− in the presence of CO in solution (Supplementary Note 7). The high stability of [Au44(SR)26]2− is attributed to its highly symmetric atomic packing pattern as well as 20 e− shell-closing electronic configuration (1S21P61D102S2).
The three most stable sizes identified in this study, i.e., [Au25(SR)18]− (icosahedral Au13 core)10, 56, [Au38(SR)24]0 (fused bi-icosahedral Au23 core)55, and [Au44(SR)26]2− (bottom-capped bi-icosahedral Au29 core)15, constitute a new magic size series based on the icosahedral Au13 unit, which are distinctly different from the face-centered cubic (FCC)-based magic size series, Au8N+4(SR)4N+8 (e.g., Au28(SR)20, Au36(SR)24, Au44(SR)28, Au52(SR)32, and Au76(SR)44) recently revealed by both experimental and theoretical means57, 58. The cluster cores in the latter are constructed by successively packing Au8 layer in (001) direction, which is vastly different from fusion of the icosahedral Au13 units in the former. The distinctly different structure construction manners indicate that the size of Au NCs might evolve in diverse routes in the sub-2 nm regime, and such diversity in size evolution may provide additional opportunities for engineering cluster properties for practical applications.
In summary, we have developed a seed-mediated growth method for synthesis of high quality [Au44(SR)26]2− from [Au25(SR)18]−. The size growth is dependent on a three-stage size hopping mechanism: Stage 0, kinetically dictated accumulation of Au25; Stage I, Au25-mediated size growth; and Stage II, thermodynamically controlled size-focusing. The accumulation of [Au25(SR)18]− in Stage 0 is directed by varied reactivity of Au(I)-SR complexes and [Au25(SR)18]− towards CO reduction. With a systematic investigation of the formation and consumption reactions of 35 Au(I)-SR complex/NC species captured in the ESI-MS spectra, we identified the initiation (i.e., adsorption of CO on [Au25(SR)18]−), driving force (i.e., 2 e− boosting valence electron counts), and detailed size evolution patterns (i.e., LaMer-like and aggregative growth) for the size growth reactions from [Au25(SR)18]− to [Au44(SR)26]2−. Based on these molecular-level insights into cluster/particle growth, we were also able to drive the seed-mediated growth reaction kit to produce intermediate sizes (e.g., molecularly pure [Au38(SR)24]0). The seed-mediated growth method and detailed mechanism study presented in this work are of interest not only because it provides an effective way to trap NC growth into a number of desirable sizes, but also because it offers new insights into some fundamentals at molecular level, such as LaMer mechanism, aggregative growth, and digestive ripening, which have puzzled the nanoscience and nanomaterials research communities for decades.
Hydrogen tetrachloroaurate (III) trihydrate (HAuCl4·3H2O), para-mercaptobenzoic acid (p-MBA), and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) from Sigma Aldrich; sodium hydroxide (NaOH) from Merck; ethanol from Fisher; and carbon monoxide (CO, 99.9%) from Singapore Oxygen Air Liquide Pte Ltd. (SOXAL) were used as-received without further purification. Ultrapure Millipore water (18.2 MΩ∙cm) was used in the preparation of all aqueous solutions. All glassware were washed with aqua regia and rinsed with ethanol and ultrapure water before use.
Synthesis of [Au25(p-MBA)18]−
[Au25(p-MBA)18]− NCs were prepared according to a reported protocol with several minor amendments30. In particular, 10 mL of aqueous solution of 50 mM p-MBA (in 150 mM NaOH) and 5 mL of aqueous solution of 50 mM HAuCl4 were added into 238.75 mL of ultrapure water in sequence, and the reaction mixture was stirred at 1,000 r.p.m. for 5 min. The pH of reaction mixture was then brought up to 10.5 by dropping in 1 M NaOH aqueous solution. After stirring for another 30 min, a light-yellow solution of Au(I)-(p-MBA) complexes was formed. Subsequently, CO was bubbled into the reaction mixture for 2 min to initiate the reduction of Au(I)-(p-MBA) complexes. The reaction was allowed to proceed air-tightly for 3 days at room temperature (25 °C) and under vigorous stirring (1,000 r.p.m.). The reddish brown solution obtained at the end of this procedure was collected as raw product.
The raw product was first concentrated by 10 times via rotary evaporation (water bath temperature 40 °C, cooling temperature 4 °C, and rotation rate 160 r.p.m.). Ethanol (double the volume of the concentrated NC solution) was then added, followed by a centrifugation at 14,000 r.p.m. for 5 min. The resultant pellet was washed with DMF for 2 times and re-dissolved in ultrapure water to form an aqueous solution of purified [Au25(p-MBA)18]− ([Au] = 10 mM) for further use.
Seed-mediated synthesis of [Au44(p-MBA)26]2−
0.25 mL of 50 mM p-MBA ethanolic solution and 0.25 mL of 50 mM HAuCl4 aqueous solution were added into 9 mL of ultrapure water in sequence, followed by stirring at 1,000 r.p.m. for 5 min to form a pale-yellow suspension of Au(I)-(p-MBA) complexes. The pH of reaction mixture was then brought up to 13.0 by dropping in 1 M NaOH, which turned the pale-yellow suspension into light-yellow solution. The reaction mixture was stirred for another 30 min prior to the addition of 0.25 mL of purified [Au25(p-MBA)18]− aqueous solution (see above for the detailed preparation). Subsequently, CO was bubbled into the reaction mixture for 2 min to initiate the growth of NCs. After stirring for 6 days at room temperature (25 °C), a black-brown solution was obtained as raw product. Cleaned [Au44(p-MBA)26]2− was obtained by centrifuging a mixture of raw product and ethanol (1/5 V/V) at 14,000 r.p.m. for 5 min, followed by a DMF washing (2 times) and re-dissolution in ultrapure water.
Seed-mediated synthesis of [Au38(p-MBA)24]0
The synthetic protocol of [Au38(p-MBA)24]0 is similar to that of [Au44(p-MBA)26]2−, except for two minor changes. The first change is the feeding amount of p-MBA solution, which is 0.5 mL in the synthesis of [Au38(p-MBA)24]0 rather than 0.25 mL in the synthesis of [Au44(p-MBA)26]2−. The other change is the solution pH, which was maintained at 12.4 in the synthesis of [Au38(p-MBA)24]0, while the solution pH was 13.0 in the synthesis of [Au44(p-MBA)26]2−.
Density functional theory computation
Parallel, resolution-of-identity density functional theory (DFT) calculations with the TPSS form of the meta generalized gradient approximation (meta-GGA) for electron exchange and correlation59 and the def2-SV(P) basis sets were performed with the quantum chemistry program Turbomole V6.560. Effective core potentials which have 19 valence electrons and include scalar relativistic corrections were used for Au61. The Conductor-like Screening Model (COSMO)62 implemented in Turbomole was used to compute the energies of solvated species. Time-dependent DFT calculation of the UV-vis absorption spectra was done at the B3LYP level. All transitions together with their oscillator strengths were then convoluted with a Lorentzian line shape of 0.15 eV broadening to make the whole optical absorption spectrum.
Solution pH of reaction mixture was measured by a Mettler-Toledo FE 20 pH-meter. UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrometer. The absorbance of reaction mixture was reset (to zero) and made reference to that of ultrapure water in individual test. ESI-MS spectra were obtained on a Bruker microTOF-Q system in negative ion mode. Detailed operating conditions of ESI-MS analysis are given as following: source temperature 120 °C, dry gas flow rate 8 L per min, nebulizer pressure 3 bar, capillary voltage 3.5 kV, and sample injection rate 3 μL per min. In a typical ESI-MS analysis, 0.2 mL of NC solution ([Au] = ~2.5 mM) was mixed with 1 mL ethanol, followed by centrifugation at 14,000 r.p.m. for 5 min. After discarding the supernatant, the resultant pellet was washed by 1 mL DMF, and then re-dissolved in 0.4 mL ultrapure water for ESI-MS measurement. The time-dependent ESI-MS spectra were normalized to the total ion count in individual test.
All relevant data are available from the corresponding author on request.
Park, J., Joo, J., Kwon, S. G., Jang, Y. & Hyeon, T. Synthesis of monodisperse spherical nanocrystals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 4630–4660 (2007).
Yu, Y., Zhang, Q., Xie, J. & Lee, J. Y. Engineering the architectural diversity of heterogeneous metallic nanocrystals. Nat. Commun. 4, 1454 (2013).
LaMer, V. K. & Dinegar, R. H. Theory, production and mechanism of formation of monodispersed hydrosols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72, 4847–4854 (1950).
Shields, S. P., Richards, V. N. & Buhro, W. E. Nucleation control of size and dispersity in aggregative nanoparticle growth. A study of the coarsening kinetics of thiolate-capped gold nanocrystals. Chem. Mater. 22, 3212–3225 (2010).
Jadzinsky, P. D., Calero, G., Ackerson, C. J., Bushnell, D. A. & Kornberg, R. D. Structure of a thiol monolayer-protected gold nanoparticle at 1.1 Å resolution. Science 318, 430–433 (2007).
Yang, H. et al. All-thiol-stabilized Ag44 and Au12Ag32 nanoparticles with single-crystal structures. Nat. Commun. 4, 2422 (2013).
Desireddy, A. et al. Ultrastable silver nanoparticles. Nature 501, 399–402 (2013).
Joshi, C. P., Bootharaju, M. S., Alhilaly, M. J. & Bakr, O. M. [Ag25(SR)18]-: The “golden” silver nanoparticle. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 11578–11581 (2015).
Dass, A. et al. Au133(SPh-tBu)52 nanomolecules: X-ray crystallography, optical, electrochemical, and theoretical analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 4610–4613 (2015).
Zhu, M., Aikens, C. M., Hollander, F. J., Schatz, G. C. & Jin, R. Correlating the crystal structure of a thiol-protected Au25 cluster and optical properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 5883–5885 (2008).
Fernando, A., Weerawardene, K. L. D. M., Karimova, N. V. & Aikens, C. M. Quantum mechanical studies of large metal, metal oxide, and metal chalcogenide nanoparticles and clusters. Chem. Rev. 115, 6112–6216 (2015).
Chen, S. et al. Gold nanoelectrodes of varied size: Transition to molecule-like charging. Science 280, 2098–2101 (1998).
Knoppe, S. & Bürgi, T. Chirality in thiolate-protected gold clusters. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 1318–1326 (2014).
Lopez-Acevedo, O., Tsunoyama, H., Tsukuda, T., Häkkinen, H. & Aikens, C. M. Chirality and electronic structure of the thiolate-protected Au38 nanocluster. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 8210–8218 (2010).
Liao, L. et al. Structure of chiral Au44(2,4-DMBT)26 nanocluster with an 18-electron shell closure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 10425–10428 (2016).
Choi, S., Dickson, R. M. & Yu, J. Developing luminescent silver nanodots for biological applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 1867–1891 (2012).
Zheng, J., Nicovich, P. R. & Dickson, R. M. Highly fluorescent noble-metal quantum dots. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 58, 409–431 (2007).
Luo, Z. et al. From aggregation-induced emission of Au(I)–thiolate complexes to ultrabright Au(0)@Au(I)–thiolate core–shell nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 16662–16670 (2012).
Yu, Y. et al. Identification of a highly luminescent Au22(SG)18 nanocluster. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 1246–1249 (2014).
Yamazoe, S., Koyasu, K. & Tsukuda, T. Nonscalable oxidation catalysis of gold clusters. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 816–824 (2013).
Li, G. & Jin, R. Atomically precise gold nanoclusters as new model catalysts. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1749–1758 (2013).
Wang, S. et al. Total structure determination of surface doping [Ag46Au24(SR)32](BPh4)2 nanocluster and its structure-related catalytic property. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500441 (2015).
Wang, Y. et al. Atomically precise alkynyl-protected metal nanoclusters as a model catalyst: Observation of promoting effect of surface ligands on catalysis by metal nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 3278–3281 (2016).
Shang, L., Stockmar, F., Azadfar, N. & Nienhaus, G. U. Intracellular thermometry by using fluorescent gold nanoclusters. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 11154–11157 (2013).
Wang, H.-H. et al. Fluorescent gold nanoclusters as a biocompatible marker for in vitro and in vivo tracking of endothelial cells. ACS Nano 5, 4337–4344 (2011).
Stamplecoskie, K. G. & Kamat, P. V. Size-dependent excited state behavior of glutathione-capped gold clusters and their light-harvesting capacity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 11093–11099 (2014).
Ji, G. et al. Promotion of reversible Li+ storage in transition metal dichalcogenides by Ag nanoclusters. NPG Asia Mater. 8, e247 (2016).
Yuan, X., Luo, Z., Yu, Y., Yao, Q. & Xie, J. Luminescent noble metal nanoclusters as an emerging optical probe for sensor development. Chem. Asian J. 8, 858–871 (2013).
Huang, C.-C., Yang, Z., Lee, K.-H. & Chang, H.-T. Synthesis of highly fluorescent gold nanoparticles for sensing mercury(II). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 6824–6828 (2007).
Luo, Z. et al. Toward understanding the growth mechanism: Tracing all stable intermediate species from reduction of Au(I)–thiolate complexes to evolution of Au25 nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 10577–10580 (2014).
AbdulHalim, L. G., Kothalawala, N., Sinatra, L., Dass, A. & Bakr, O. M. Neat and complete: Thiolate-ligand exchange on a silver molecular nanoparticle. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 15865–15868 (2014).
Bootharaju, M. S. et al. Reversible size control of silver nanoclusters via ligand-exchange. Chem. Mater. 27, 4289–4297 (2015).
Zhou, M. et al. Evolution from the plasmon to exciton state in ligand-protected atomically precise gold nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 7, 13240 (2016).
Yang, H. et al. Plasmonic twinned silver nanoparticles with molecular precision. Nat. Commun. 7, 12809 (2016).
Goswami, N., Yao, Q., Chen, T. & Xie, J. Mechanistic exploration and controlled synthesis of precise thiolate-gold nanoclusters. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 329, 1–15 (2016).
Jin, R. et al. Size focusing: A methodology for synthesizing atomically precise gold nanoclusters. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 2903–2910 (2010).
Lu, Y. & Chen, W. Sub-nanometre sized metal clusters: From synthetic challenges to the unique property discoveries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 3594–3623 (2012).
Yao, Q., Yuan, X., Yu, Y., Yu, Y., Xie, J. & Lee, J. Y. Introducing amphiphilicity to noble metal nanoclusters via phase-transfer driven ion-pairing reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 2128–2136 (2015).
Barngrover, B. M. & Aikens, C. M. The golden pathway to thiolate-stabilized nanoparticles: Following the formation of gold(I) thiolate from gold(III) chloride. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 12590–12595 (2012).
Barngrover, B. M. & Aikens, C. M. Electron and hydride addition to gold(I) thiolate oligomers: Implications for gold–thiolate nanoparticle growth mechanisms. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 990–994 (2011).
Goulet, P. J. G. & Lennox, R. B. New insights into Brust−Schiffrin metal nanoparticle synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 9582–9584 (2010).
Parker, J. F., Weaver, J. E. F., McCallum, F., Fields-Zinna, C. A. & Murray, R. W. Synthesis of monodisperse [Oct4N+][Au25(SR)18 −] nanoparticles, with some mechanistic observations. Langmuir 26, 13650–13654 (2010).
Tofanelli, M. A. & Ackerson, C. J. Superatom electron configuration predicts thermal stability of Au25(SR)18 nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 16937–16940 (2012).
Shichibu, Y., Negishi, Y., Tsunoyama, H., Kanehara, M., Teranishi, T. & Tsukuda, T. Extremely high stability of glutathionate-protected Au25 clusters against core etching. Small 3, 835–839 (2007).
Jin, S. et al. Two electron reduction: From quantum dots to metal nanoclusters. Chem. Mater. 28, 7905–7911 (2016).
Barngrover, B. M., Manges, T. J. & Aikens, C. M. Prediction of nonradical Au(0)-containing precursors in nanoparticle growth processes. J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 889–895 (2015).
Grönbeck, H., Walter, M. & Häkkinen, H. Theoretical characterization of cyclic thiolated gold clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 10268–10275 (2006).
Shaw, C. F., Cancro, M. P., Witkiewicz, P. L. & Eldridge, J. E. Gold(III) oxidation of disulfides in aqueous solution. Inorg. Chem. 19, 3198–3201 (1980).
van Bergen, L. A. H., Roos, G. & De Proft, F. From thiol to sulfonic acid: Modeling the oxidation pathway of protein thiols by hydrogen peroxide. J. Phys. Chem. A 118, 6078–6084 (2014).
Jiang, D.-e, Tiago, M. L., Luo, W. & Dai, S. The “staple” motif: A key to stability of thiolate-protected gold nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 2777–2779 (2008).
Yamazoe, S. et al. Hierarchy of bond stiffnesses within icosahedral-based gold clusters protected by thiolates. Nat. Commun. 7, 10414 (2016).
Qian, H., Zhu, Y. & Jin, R. Size-focusing synthesis, optical and electrochemical properties of monodisperse Au38(SC2H4Ph)24 nanoclusters. ACS Nano 3, 3795–3803 (2009).
Tian, S. et al. Structural isomserism in gold nanoparticles revealed by X-ray crystallography. Nat. Commun. 6, 8667 (2015).
Toikkanen, O., Ruiz, V., Rönnholm, G., Kalkkinen, N., Liljeroth, P. & Quinn, B. M. Synthesis and stability of monolayer-protected Au38 clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 11049–11055 (2008).
Qian, H., Eckenhoff, W. T., Zhu, Y., Pintauer, T. & Jin, R. Total structure determination of thiolate-protected Au38 nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 8280–8281 (2010).
Heaven, M. W., Dass, A., White, P. S., Holt, K. M. & Murray, R. W. Crystal structure of the gold nanoparticle [N(C8H17)4][Au25(SCH2CH2Ph)18]. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3754–3755 (2008).
Zeng, C. et al. Gold quantum boxes: On the periodicities and the quantum confinement in the Au28, Au36, Au44, and Au52 magic series. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 3950–3953 (2016).
Ma, Z., Wang, P., Zhou, G., Tang, J., Li, H. & Pei, Y. Correlating the structure and optical absorption properties of Au76(SR)44 cluster. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 13739–13748 (2016).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Ahlrichs, R., Bär, M., Häser, M., Horn, H. & Kölmel, C. Electronic structure calculations on workstation computers: The program system turbomole. Chem. Phys. Lett. 162, 165–169 (1989).
Andrae, D., Häußermann, U., Dolg, M., Stoll, H. & Preuß, H. Energy-adjustedab initio pseudopotentials for the second and third row transition elements. Theor. Chim. Acta 77, 123–141 (1990).
Klamt, A. & Schuurmann, G. COSMO: A new approach to dielectric screening in solvents with explicit expressions for the screening energy and its gradient. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 2, 799–805 (1993).
We acknowledge the financial support from the Ministry of Education, Singapore, Academic Research Grant R-279-000-481-112. V.F. and D.-e.J. were supported by the Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Yao, Q., Yuan, X., Fung, V. et al. Understanding seed-mediated growth of gold nanoclusters at molecular level. Nat Commun 8, 927 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00970-1
Experimental evidences support the existence of an aggregation/disaggregation step in the Turkevich synthesis of gold nanoparticles
Copper Clusters: An Effective Antibacterial for Eradicating Multidrug‐Resistant Bacterial Infection In Vitro and In Vivo
Advanced Functional Materials (2021)
Molecular reactivity of thiolate-protected noble metal nanoclusters: synthesis, self-assembly, and applications
Chemical Science (2021)