Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Oxygen evolution reaction dynamics monitored by an individual nanosheet-based electronic circuit

Abstract

The oxygen evolution reaction involves complex interplay among electrolyte, solid catalyst, and gas-phase and liquid-phase reactants and products. Monitoring catalysis interfaces between catalyst and electrolyte can provide valuable insights into catalytic ability. But it is a challenging task due to the additive solid supports in traditional measurement. Here we design a nanodevice platform and combine on-chip electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurement, temporary I-V measurement of an individual nanosheet, and molecular dynamic calculations to provide a direct way for nanoscale catalytic diagnosis. By removing O2 in electrolyte, a dramatic decrease in Tafel slope of over 20% and early onset potential of 1.344 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode are achieved. Our studies reveal that O2 reduces hydroxyl ion density at catalyst interface, resulting in poor kinetics and negative catalytic performance. The obtained in-depth understanding could provide valuable clues for catalysis system design. Our method could also be useful to analyze other catalytic processes.

Introduction

Water electrolysis has been regarded as an environmentally friendly route to hydrogen gas production1,2,3. However, efficiency of water catalysis is severely limited by poor kinetics of the oxygen oxidation reaction, namely oxygen evolution reaction (OER)3, 4. OER is a complex process that involves the interplay among solid catalysts, electrolyte, gas-phase and liquid-phase reactants, and products5, 6. During an OER process, chemical reactions mainly take place at catalysts/electrolyte interface. Unfortunately, there are insufficient in-depth understanding of the reaction interfaces7. The difficulty mainly arises from two experimental limitations: first, the interfaces for catalytic reaction are generally buried between solid and liquid phases, which are very difficult to access and detect by conventional spectroscopic techniques;8 second, active species are mixed with binders and conductive carbon additives, which hinder an accurate investigation of the electrochemical interfaces in traditional measurements8, 9.

Previously, most of fundamental studies focused on rate-determining steps and identification of catalytic activity descriptor for the OER from thermodynamic aspect10,11,12. There have been significant advances on relationships between material’s catalytic activities and its electronic structure, aided by a wealth of spectroscopic techniques and first-principles computations13, 14. However, there are much fewer studies on OER kinetic process, particularly those processes taking place in an electrode/electrolyte interface region. The distribution of ions and water at the interface determine the kinetics of mass and electron transfer process. Our understanding is still quite limited. Oxygen is a product of OER. In terms of reaction equilibrium (i.e., Le Chatelier’s principle), it is known that O2 concentration increase in electrolyte (with the ongoing of OER) hinders the catalytic reaction. But there is no clear answer whether oxygen molecules would affect OER kinetics. The initial OER catalytic steps involve hydroxide formation at active surface sites through the discharge of a hydroxide ion (* + OH → *OH + e) in alkaline solution7. It is reasonable to expect that oxygen molecules could adsorb at the reaction interfaces, hindering the formation of hydroxide and hence the catalytic kinetic performance. It is fundamentally important to investigate this hypothesis and gain in-depth understanding.

Currently, a single nanostructure electrochemical device has been exploited as a powerful tool to investigate intrinsic electrochemical processes and properties at nanoscale15,16,17,18,19,20. Several unique advantages enable such a nanodevice to be a great platform to directly probe the OER processes for reliable information. First, a single nanowire/nanosheet can be used as the working electrode, avoiding influences of the binders and conductive carbon additives20,21,22. Second, structure and composition of the nanodevice can be precisely designed and controlled, which is essential to eliminate experimental uncertainties and allows quantitatively or semi-quantitatively fundamental studies19. Third, it is much easier to monitor the change of physical properties of individual nanowire and nanosheet (such as conductivity) in a nanodevice. This advantage is largely unexplored up to date. It could allow us to probe interface properties during the OER process directly.

In this work, we design a single electrochemical nanodevice consisting of nickel nanoparticle catalysts anchored on a graphene nanosheet electrode. We propose and use concurrent measurement of electrical conductivity of the electrode materials to probe the effects of O2 at the reaction interface during the OER. The on-chip electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurement and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are also carried out. Our results show that oxygen in electrolyte has an inhibition effect on OER performance. A significant decrease in Tafel slope over 20% and an early onset potential of 1.344 V (with reference to RHE) are observed by removing O2 in electrolyte. Our study reveals that oxygen adsorption at catalytic interface would reduce OH ion concentration in the double layer (DL) and thus result in a poor kinetics and negative catalytic performance.

Results

Device fabrication

Figure 1c depicts the Ni-graphene-based electrochemical device. The fabrication procedure is schematically illustrated in Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2 and Supplementary Note 1. The Ni-Graphene nanosheets were prepared through a hydrothermal method and subsequent heat treatment (Supplementary Note 2). Then, the Ni-graphene nanosheets were selectively deposited onto Si/SiO2 wafer. Three metallic electrodes (WE1, WE2, and WE3) were deposited on the device using electron beam lithography followed by Au/Cr (150 nm/5 nm) evaporation and a lift-off process (Fig. 1b). An insulating photoresist (SU8-2002) layer was used to cover the metallic electrodes to prevent leakage current to the aqueous electrolyte. The insulating property of the photoresist and SiO2 was verified through electrical resistance measurement. We found that the resistance of photoresist layer as well as the SiO2 (Supplementary Fig. 3) was around four orders of magnitudes larger than that of Ni-graphene nanosheet, indicating that leakage currents passing through SiO2 and photoresist should be negligible and would not interfere the electric and electrochemical signals during later electrochemical measurements. In addition, to check whether there was parasitic reaction in our nanodevice, a comparable device in which there were no active catalysts while other parts were kept the same as the original one was fabricated and tested (Supplementary Fig. 4). No reaction peaks were observed.

Fig. 1
figure1

Working principle of temporal electrical transport measurement. a TEM image of as-prepared Ni-graphene nanosheets with a scale bar at 200 nm. b Optical microscope image of nanosheets contacted with three metallic electrodes with a scale bar at 10 μm. c Schematic illustration of the Ni-graphene nanosheet-based device with a microscopic electrochemical cell on it. d Illustration of the device (inset) and corresponding measurement equipment layout with the three-dimensional view

Electrochemical performance

A number of Ni particles with diameter around 22.6 nm (Supplementary Note 3 and Supplementary Fig. 5) were anchored on graphene surface (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 6). Figure 1d shows the experimental setup. Figure 2a shows that the onset potential is 1.380 V vs. RHE in electrolyte with saturated O2. By removing oxygen in electrolyte (see Methods section), the onset potential is reduced to 1.344 V vs. RHE and a high current density of 10 mA cm−2 was measured at a low potential of 1.438 V vs. RHE. To check whether the results obtained from this nanodevice is consistent with conventional powder sample performance, Supplementary Fig. 7a–c compare OER performance of Ni catalysts that were prepared in conventional ways. There were clear performance gaps between oxygen-absence and oxygen-presence conditions. They qualitatively agree with the results from our nanodevice. We also found that the nanosheet had a higher current density than that of traditional powder samples at a given potential. This could be attributed to a large effective surface area and enhanced electron transport (shorter distance between active sites and metallic electrodes)9, 23,24,25,26. For the non-iR-corrected Tafel plots of the polarization curves (Fig. 2b), the Ni-graphene nanosheet under oxygen-absence condition shows a smaller Tafel slope (147.8 mV/decade) than that under oxygen-presence condition (187.5 mV/decade), showing a faster kinetic process. It indicates the critical effect of O2 on the reaction kinetics.

Fig. 2
figure2

OER activity of Ni-graphene nanosheet-based device. a Oxygen evolution currents of Ni-graphene nanosheet measured in 0.1 M KOH. b Tafel plots of OER currents in a. c The Nyquist plots in the potential at 1.2 V vs. RHE together with the responding fitted curve based on the equivalent circuit model. d Plot of the high- and low-frequency time constants

To gain more understanding, on-chip EIS measurement was carried out. Figure 2c shows the results at an electrochemical potential of 1.2 V vs. RHE. A two constant parallel model27 was adopted to analyze the EIS data (Supplementary Figs. 810). At low frequency, the time constants (τ) were almost the same under both conditions. However, two orders of magnitude decrease of τ at high frequency is observed for the oxygen-absence case (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Note 4). This should be contributed to the reduced charge transfer resistance at interface27,28,29,30. But EIS data could not provide insights to understand such a reduction.

Resistance testing and analysis

We designed and performed on-chip concurrent IV measurement of the Ni-graphene electrode to directly probe the interface property. A series of temporal IV measurements were carried out during both oxidation (from 0 to 0.7 V vs. Ag/AgCl) and subsequent reduction (from 0.7 to 0 V vs. Ag/AgCl) process31. The evolution of the conductivity (Fig. 3a) and electrode structure (Supplementary Fig. 11) is reversible, indicating a reliably repeatable performance of this nanodevice. Figure 3b, c and Supplementary Fig. 12 show that the resistance from IV results is significantly different under oxygen-absence and oxygen-presence conditions, which correlates with the OER performance gaps (Fig. 2). With the presence of oxygen in electrolyte, the initial resistance is 17% higher than that in the electrolyte without O2.

Fig. 3
figure3

Temporal electrical transport measurement of the Ni-graphene nanosheet-based device. a Resistance (under potential bias 2 mV) vs. electrochemical potentials trace corresponding to Fig. 2a. b IV characteristics of a typical Ni-graphene nanosheet-based device at potential of 0 V vs. Ag/AgCl. c IV characteristics of a typical Ni-graphene nanosheet-based device at potential of 0.7 V vs. Ag/AgCl

Our IV measurement approach has several advantages over EIS. First, our EIS data show nearly no differences at the highest frequency under oxygen-presence and oxygen-absence conditions. It could not provide sufficient resolution to make a comparison of the electrode resistance under these two conditions. Second, EIS measurement is time-consuming, which is not feasible for in situ measurement. Third, a relative complicated equivalent circuit model is required to interpret EIS results.

The working principle behind our IV measurement is the gating effect of graphene. The electrochemical potential applied on our device can be decomposed into two parts (Supplementary Fig. 13). One is applied on the electric double layer (EDL) at the electrode–electrolyte interface. The second one is the voltage applied on graphene. According to the electrochemical-gating model31, 32, we have.

$${V_{\rm{G}}} = \frac{{h \cdot {v_{\rm{F}}}\cdot\sqrt {\pi n} }}{e} + \frac{{ne}}{{{C_{{\rm{dl}}}}}}$$
(1)

where V G is the electrochemical gate voltage vs. reference, h is the reduced Plank’s constant, v F is the Fermi velocity of the Dirac electron in nanosheets, e is the electron charge, n is the carrier density, and C dl is the double layer capacitance. The first term on the right of Eq. (1) describes the voltage applied on graphene and its relationship to carrier density n. The second term describes the relationship between EDL voltage and EDL capacitance32.

We hypothesize that oxygen would lead to a reduced double layer capacitance (C dl). As a result, the EDL voltage (second term in Eq. (1)) will increase. Provided a constant value of V G in our experiments, the carrier density n in the electrode would drop (first term in Eq. (1)) and the electrode resistance increases. This could explain the observed electrode resistance differences between oxygen-presence and oxygen-absence conditions in our IV experiments.

MD simulation

In order to understand how O2 could influence C dl, MD simulations were employed (Supplementary Note 5, Supplementary Fig. 14, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). In our simulations, the electrolyte was 1 M KOH with or without oxygen molecules. The catalyst surface was Ni(111) plane. The electrolyte was maintained at 298 K using the Berendsen thermostat. MD simulation was run for 1.5 ns to ensure thermo-equilibrium of the system. The results generated during the last 1 ns were used to analyze the EDL structure near the Ni surface. Here, we split the electrolyte region into a set of bins (of 0.5 Å in width) along the direction (x) perpendicular to the Ni surface. The relative number densities ρ(x) of OH, K+, and O2 were calculated as the ratio of volumetric number density in each bin over that in electrolyte bulk33.

Figure 4a and b show the results on neutral Ni surface at an oxygen concentration of 0.0 and 1.2 mmol/cm3, respectively. The sharp peaks represent accumulation of the electrolyte ions and oxygen molecules next to the electrode surfaces. Compared with Fig. 4a, Fig. 4b clearly demonstrates that O2 is adsorbed at interface, where the position is similar to the position of adsorbed OH, and significantly hindered accumulation of OH in EDL. The increase of O2 concentration leads to a monotonic decrease of OH density at the reaction interface (Fig. 4d, Supplementary Fig. 15), leading to the decrease of C dl.

Fig. 4
figure4

MD simulation results. a Relative number density ρ of different electrolyte ions as a function of distance from the Ni cathode surface with oxygen concentration of 0. b Relative number density ρ of different electrolyte ions as a function of distance from the Ni cathode surface with oxygen concentration of 0.12 mmol/cm3. c Relative number density ρ of different electrolyte ions as a function of distance from the Ni cathode surface with oxygen concentration of 0.12 mmol/cm3 and with a charge of +0.0083e/Ni-atom. d The relative number density ρ of OH ions as a function of the concentration of oxygen in the electrolyte. e The relative density of OH ions in the stern layer as a function of the charge number for per Ni atom

Considering Ni surface would be oxidized during the OER process, other MD simulations were performed to examine whether the surface oxidation would affect our observations based on the above pure Ni theoretical model. As it is difficult to determine oxidation degree at the Ni surface, we choose the fully oxidized case (NiO-Ni). The MD model and the unit cell structure of NiO-Ni are presented in Supplementary Fig. 16. The ions distribution next to the NiO-Ni surface under oxygen-presence condition is presented in Supplementary Fig. 17. Again, the oxygen molecules exhibit a strong adsorption near the surface, leading to a reduction of OH density (Supplementary Fig. 18). The detrimental effect of oxygen should stem from the strong van der Waals (vdW) force between O(O2) and Ni/NiO, which is nearly the same to the interaction between O(OH) and Ni/NiO (Supplementary Table 3). The similar interaction force drives the O2 and OH occupy similar positions next to the Ni/NiO surface. This reduces the amount of OH in the EDL.

During the OER process, the Ni surface should have positive charges. The Coulomb force could drive OH closer to Ni surface, eliminating the detrimental role of O2. To examine this effect, a set of surface charges was induced in the system (Supplementary Fig. 19). Figure 4c shows the results of a charged Ni surface with +0.0083e/Ni-atom and oxygen concentration of 1.2 mmol/cm3. The Coulomb interaction clearly leads to an enhanced relative density of OH (Fig. 4c) in comparison with that in Fig. 4a. But the hindrance effect of oxygen still exists (Fig. 4e). In Fig. 4e, we summarize the OH relative density in the stern layer as a function of surface charge at oxygen concentration of 0 or 1.2 mmol/cm3. The difference is narrowing under a higher surface charge. This trend is consistent with the narrowing conductivity gap in the temporal IV experimental results (Fig. 3c).

Discussion

The previous studies conclude that the reaction steps in alkaline electrolyte for the OER process are as follows (the * represents active site on the metal surface)34:

$$4{\rm{O}}{{\rm{H}}^ - } \leftrightarrow {\rm{O}}{{\rm{H}}^{\rm{*}}} + 3{\rm{O}}{{\rm{H}}^ - } + {{\rm{e}}^ - }$$
(2)
$$ \leftrightarrow {{\rm{O}}^{\rm{*}}} + {{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}} + 2{\rm{O}}{{\rm{H}}^ - } + 2{{\rm{e}}^ - }$$
(3)
$$ \leftrightarrow {\rm{HO}}{{\rm{O}}^{\rm{*}}} + {{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}} + {\rm{O}}{{\rm{H}}^ - } + 3{{\rm{e}}^ - }$$
(4)
$$ \to {{\rm{O}}_2} + 2{{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}} + 4{{\rm{e}}^ - }$$
(5)

where Ni is not able to immediately oxidize water. Ni transforms into a highly reactive species in the alkaline solution and then generates O2. From thermodynamic aspect, the increased O2 concentration in reaction system leads to a higher Gibbs free energy, thereby increasing the onset potential under oxygen-presence condition. It could also be understood in terms of Le Chatelier’s principle. However, the reaction kinetic processes are not considered in above two thermodynamic aspects. The kinetic process includes the transport of the reactants to an active site, the adsorption of the reactions to the active site, and the reaction of reactants to form an adsorbed product. Using EIS, temporal IV measurement results, and MD simulation, we can conclude that O2 can adsorb near the surface of catalyst driven by the strong vdW interaction. Their position overlaps with that of adsorbed OH ions, reducing the concentration of OH in EDL, thus slowing down the charge transfer process and OER reaction kinetics. Different from the Le Chatelier’s principle, which provides a clue to understand reaction direction from thermodynamic perspective, our new understanding offers insights on how surface adsorbed O2 could influence the reaction kinetics. It should be noted that our conclusion is similar to that in catalytic N2O gas decomposition, in which reaction rate could be improved for around three times by using an oxygen-selective membrane35.

In conclusion, we developed a nano-electrochemical Ni-graphene device to investigate the effects of oxygen in the electrolyte on OER kinetics at catalyst interfaces. By removing O2 in electrolyte, we observed a significant decrease in Tafel slope of over 20% and an early onset potential of 1.344 V vs. RHE. A temporal in-device electronic characteristic measurement was employed together with an on-chip EIS measurement and MD simulations. We conclude that the oxygen acts as a barrier to significantly reduce the concentration of OH ions at catalyst surface, slowing down the charge transfer process and OER kinetics. This new insight could provide valuable clues to design high-performance catalyst systems. This work also presents a powerful nano-electrochemical device platform and a temporal IV measurement method to investigate the OER kinetic interface properties.

Methods

OER activity characterization and in-device EIS measurement

The device was loaded on a probe station (Lake shore, PPTX). The OER activities were characterized with a three-electrode electrochemical system using an electrochemical workstation (Autolab PGSTAT 302N). The WE1, platinum (Pt), and Ag/AgCl/saturated KCl were used as the working, counter, and reference electrodes, respectively (Supplementary Note 6). Two different electrolytes were adopted with different contents of O2, namely 0.1 M KOH under presence with O2 or absence with O2. Specifically, the electrolyte absent with O2 was prepared using degassing method where N2 was inserted into the 5 mL 0.1 M KOH electrolyte for 1 h to expel the O2. This device was maintained at 298 K by using a model 336 cryogenic temperature controller. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) experiments at different scan rates (5–30 mV/s) and linear-sweep voltammograms (LSV) at a scan rate of 5 mV/s were performed. The catalyst was cycled until stable CV curves were obtained. After that the catalyst performance was measured in LSV testing36. The in-device EIS was controlled at different electrochemical working potentials and to characterize the effects of the oxygen on the catalytic interface. To ensure a complete characterization, the EIS measurements were recorded over four frequency decades, from 10 KHz to 1 Hz, with potential amplitude of 10 mV.

Temporal IV measurement

As outlined in Fig. 1d, a semiconductor parameter analyzer (Agilent, B1500A) was connected to the WE2 and WE3 electrode. The temporal IV measurement detected the electrical transport properties of Ni-graphene nanosheet during the electrolysis process under a tiny bias voltage (up to 2 mV). Supplementary Fig. 20 shows the schematic illustration of the concurrent measurement of this work, and the equivalent circuit model of the electrical transport spectroscopy (gate) measurement37. Note that all the samples were measured at an excitation current <20 nA and thus any heating effects should be negligible.

Data availability

The data that support the finding of this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Barnett, S. M., Goldberg, K. I. & Mayer, J. M. A soluble copper–bipyridine water-oxidation electrocatalyst. Nat. Chem. 4, 498–502 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dionigi, F. & Strasser, P. NiFe-based (Oxy) hydroxide catalysts for oxygen evolution reaction in non-acidic electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater 6, 1614 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Subbaraman, R. et al. Trends in activity for the water electrolyser reactions on 3d M (Ni, Co, Fe, Mn) hydr (oxy) oxide catalysts. Nat. Mater 11, 550–557 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ng, J. W. D. et al. Gold-supported cerium-doped NiOx catalysts for water oxidation. Nat. Energy 1, 16053 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ding, M. et al. An on-chip electrical transport spectroscopy approach for in situ monitoring electrochemical interfaces. Nat. Commun. 6, 7867 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Holze, R. Surface and Interface Analysis: An Electrochemists Toolbox Vol. 74 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2008).

  7. 7.

    Doyle, R. L. & Lyons, M. E. An electrochemical impedance study of the oxygen evolution reaction at hydrous iron oxide in base. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 5224–5237 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gong, M. et al. An advanced Ni–Fe layered double hydroxide electrocatalyst for water oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 8452–8455 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mistry, H., Varela, A. S., Kühl, S., Strasser, P. & Cuenya, B. R. Nanostructured electrocatalysts with tunable activity and selectivity. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16009 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Okamura, M. et al. A pentanuclear iron catalyst designed for water oxidation. Nature 530, 465–468 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dau, H. et al. The mechanism of water oxidation: from electrolysis via homogeneous to biological catalysis. ChemCatChem. 2, 724–761 (2010).

    MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Marini, S. et al. Advanced alkaline water electrolysis. Electrochim. Acta 82, 384–391 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Rossmeisl, J., Qu, Z.-W., Zhu, H., Kroes, G.-J. & Nørskov, J. K. Electrolysis of water on oxide surfaces. J. Electroanal. Chem. 607, 83–89 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Grimaud, A., Hong, W., Shao-Horn, Y. & Tarascon, J.-M. Anionic redox processes for electrochemical devices. Nat. Mater. 15, 121–126 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liu, Z. et al. Anomalous high capacitance in a coaxial single nanowire capacitor. Nat. Commun. 3, 879 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Boles, S. T., Sedlmayr, A., Kraft, O. & Mönig, R. In situ cycling and mechanical testing of silicon nanowire anodes for lithium-ion battery applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 243901 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Huang, J. Y. et al. In situ observation of the electrochemical lithiation of a single SnO2 nanowire electrode. Science 330, 1515–1520 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mai, L., Tian, X., Xu, X., Chang, L. & Xu, L. Nanowire electrodes for electrochemical energy storage devices. Chem. Rev. 114, 11828–11862 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lieber, C. M. Semiconductor nanowires: a platform for nanoscience and nanotechnology. MRS Bull. 36, 1052–1063 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tian, B. et al. Coaxial silicon nanowires as solar cells and nanoelectronic power sources. Nature 449, 885–889 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Xu, X. et al. In situ investigation of Li and Na ion transport with single nanowire electrochemical devices. Nano. Lett. 15, 3879–3884 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Xiong, F. et al. Li intercalation in MoS2: In situ observation of its dynamics and tuning optical and electrical properties. Nano. Lett. 15, 6777–6784 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Welch, C. M. & Compton, R. G. The use of nanoparticles in electroanalysis: a review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 384, 601–619 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Katz, E., Willner, I. & Wang, J. Electroanalytical and bioelectroanalytical systems based on metal and semiconductor nanoparticles. Electroanalysis 16, 19–44 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gowda, S. R., Leela Mohana Reddy, A., Zhan, X. & Ajayan, P. M. Building energy storage device on a single nanowire. Nano. Lett. 11, 3329–3333 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Voiry, D. et al. The role of electronic coupling between substrate and 2D MoS2 nanosheets in electrocatalytic production of hydrogen. Nat. Mater. 15, 1003 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Armstrong, R. & Henderson, M. Impedance plane display of a reaction with an adsorbed intermediate. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 39, 81–90 (1972).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lyons, M. E. & Brandon, M. P. The significance of electrochemical impedance spectra recorded during active oxygen evolution for oxide covered Ni, Co and Fe electrodes in alkaline solution. J. Electroanal. Chem. 631, 62–70 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Harrington, D. & Conway, B. a. c. Impedance of Faradaic reactions involving electrosorbed intermediates—I. Kinetic theory. Electrochim. Acta 32, 1703–1712 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Strmcnik, D. et al. Improving the hydrogen oxidation reaction rate by promotion of hydroxyl adsorption. Nat. Chem. 5, 300–306 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Chen, F., Qing, Q., Xia, J., Li, J. & Tao, N. Electrochemical gate-controlled charge transport in graphene in ionic liquid and aqueous solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 9908–9909 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Das, A. et al. Monitoring dopants by Raman scattering in an electrochemically top-gated graphene transistor. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 210–215 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Jiang, G., Cheng, C., Li, D. & Liu, J. Z. Molecular dynamics simulations of the electric double layer capacitance of graphene electrodes in mono-valent aqueous electrolytes. Nano Res. 9, 174–186 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Rossmeisl, J., Logadottir, A. & Nørskov, J. K. Electrolysis of water on (oxidized) metal surfaces. Chem. Phys. 319, 178–184 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Jiang, H. et al. Direct decomposition of nitrous oxide to nitrogen by in situ oxygen removal with a perovskite membrane. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 2983–2986 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wang, J. et al. Synergistic effect between metal–nitrogen–carbon sheets and NiO nanoparticles for enhanced electrochemical water‐oxidation performance. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 10530–10534 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ding, M. et al. Nanoelectronic investigation reveals the electrochemical basis of electrical conductivity in shewanella and geobacter. ACS Nano. 10, 9919–9926 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2013CB934103, 2012CB933003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51302203, 11525211, 51272197, 51502227), the International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China (2013DFA50840), the Hubei Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (2014CFA035), the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2013-ZD-7, 2014-YB-02). This research/project was undertaken with the assistance of resources and services from the National Computational Infrastructure (NCI), which is supported by the Australian Government.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.M., M.Y. and P.W. designed the experiments. M.Y., P.W., J.M. and X.P. performed the experiments. J.Z.L., G.J. and P.W. performed the MD simulations. M.Y., P.W., J.Z.L., G.J. and L.Q. discussed the interpretation of results and co-wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mengyu Yan or Jefferson Zhe Liu or Liqiang Mai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, P., Yan, M., Meng, J. et al. Oxygen evolution reaction dynamics monitored by an individual nanosheet-based electronic circuit. Nat Commun 8, 645 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00778-z

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing