Failure to secrete sufficient quantities of insulin is a pathological feature of type-1 and type-2 diabetes, and also reduces the success of islet cell transplantation. Here we demonstrate that Y1 receptor signaling inhibits insulin release in β-cells, and show that this can be pharmacologically exploited to boost insulin secretion. Transplanting islets with Y1 receptor deficiency accelerates the normalization of hyperglycemia in chemically induced diabetic recipient mice, which can also be achieved by short-term pharmacological blockade of Y1 receptors in transplanted mouse and human islets. Furthermore, treatment of non-obese diabetic mice with a Y1 receptor antagonist delays the onset of diabetes. Mechanistically, Y1 receptor signaling inhibits the production of cAMP in islets, which via CREB mediated pathways results in the down-regulation of several key enzymes in glycolysis and ATP production. Thus, manipulating Y1 receptor signaling in β-cells offers a unique therapeutic opportunity for correcting insulin deficiency as it occurs in the pathological state of type-1 diabetes as well as during islet transplantation.
Insulin is the key hormone that regulates glucose metabolism and its release from β-cells is tightly controlled by homeostatic mechanisms1. Dysregulated release of insulin in response to changes in physiological glucose is central to the pathophysiology of type-1 (T1D) and type-2 (T2D) diabetes2,3,4, thus efforts to increase insulin secretion in response to physiological demands represents a significant area of interest. Currently, islet transplantation is being explored as a potential treatment option for T1D patients to become insulin independent5. However, the efficiency of this approach remains poor due to the low survival rate and diminished efficiency of donor islets6 further aggravated by the scarcity of donor organs. Therefore, it is recognized that any improvement in this therapeutic option will require a methodology that enhances β-cell function and survival during transplantation. Efforts to achieve this have been mainly directed at the pathways that stimulate insulin secretion, however, with limited success. Although much is known about what inhibits insulin secretion, improving β-cell function by targeting the pathways that suppress the release of insulin remain largely unexplored as a therapeutic option.
Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that upregulation of intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) can promote insulin release and improve pancreatic β-cell function7,8,9,10,11. For instance, increasing cAMP levels, as a result of glucagon-like-peptide 1 (GLP-1) signaling in β-cells potentiates insulin secretion12, highlighting this pathway as a critical control point. Importantly, Y-receptors (Y1, Y2, Y4, Y5, and y6)13, 14 which are activated by neuropeptide Y (NPY) family members preferentially associate with Gi/o G-proteins and, therefore, act in an inhibitory fashion reducing cAMP levels15,16,17. Particularly, Y1 receptors are highly expressed in β-cells, indicating the potential for an inhibitory effect of Y1 receptor signaling to directly regulate insulin release from β-cells.
Moreover, the other Y-receptor ligands, peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide, are found to be expressed in L-type cells of the gut as well as various pancreatic cell types18, 19. PYY released in the gut in response to food ingestion is well recognized for its role to inhibit feeding and increase energy expenditure through the activation of hypothalamic and brain stem Y-receptors20,21,22,23. Importantly, PYY has also been implicated in the inhibition of insulin release and this notion was supported by studies showing that application of PYY decreases glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from rat and mouse islets21, 24, 25. Although these results suggest that PYY may act through a paracrine mechanism to tonically inhibit insulin secretion in the islets, the precise Y receptor mediating this is unclear. Here, we demonstrate that PYY suppressed insulin secretion via Y1 receptor and inhibition of Y1 receptor signaling in islets is advantageous for the enhancement of β-cell function. Our findings have direct relevance to the clinical scenario of islet transplantation and could potentially serve as a new therapeutic option to enhance the efficiency and efficacy of islets derived from deceased organ donors, but also alternate sources including xenogeneic or stem-cell-derived islets.
Y1 receptor signaling in β-cells controls insulin secretion
In addition to L-type cells, PYY is also expressed in α-cells of mouse and human pancreatic islets26, 27 (Fig. 1a), allowing for a possible paracrine action of PYY signaling via Y1 receptors expressed on β-cells to inhibit cAMP production, thereby reducing insulin release. Previous research has shown that genetic deletion of PYY or Y1 receptor genes in mice leads to a phenotype with increased serum insulin levels21, 28. Consistent with these findings the overproduction of PYY in transgenic mice results in the opposite phenotype, with reduced serum insulin levels29. Using a β-cell specific ‘translating ribosome affinity purification’ mouse model we could show specific enrichment of Y1 receptor mRNA in β-cells confirming the physical localization of this Y-receptor specifically in β-cells (Supplementary Fig. 1a). To verify the purity of this preparation we also performed quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) on other β-cell specific genes including Ins1, Mafa1, Pdx1, Nkx6.1 and as a negative control Pyy all showing the expected enrichment or absence, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 1b). To further investigate whether Y1 receptors in β-cells are under a regulatory control depending on energy status, we determined Y1 receptor expression in the β-cells from lean and 12-week high-fat diet fed obese mice. Interestingly, we found that Y1 receptor expression was significantly downregulated in obese hyperinsulinemic mice (Fig. 1b) indicating that reduced Y1 receptor signaling may be required for β-cells to secrete more insulin as a compensatory mechanism specifically under conditions of an insulin resistance state. This is consistent with the observed increase in insulin levels in β-cell specific Y1 knockout mice fed a high-fat diet (Supplementary Fig. 2a). To further functionally test this we performed glucose-stimulated insulin release (GSIS) experiments on isolated islets of C57BL/6JAusb (wild type, WT) and β-cell specific Y1 knockout mice. As shown in Fig. 1c, PYY significantly reduced insulin release from cultured islets stimulated with 11 mM glucose. Importantly, addition of the selective Y1 receptor antagonist BIBO330430 completely abolished PYY-induced inhibition of insulin release (Fig. 1c). Consistent with this, lack of Y1 receptors in β-cells renders them more responsive to glucose with significantly elevated insulin levels already observed with stimulation of 2 mM glucose (Supplementary Fig. 2b). To assess the dynamics of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in response to PYY and Y1 receptor antagonism on islets we performed islet perifusion studies in WT islets. As shown in Fig. 1d, e, PYY significantly inhibits the first phase response of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion whereas Y1 antagonism employing BIBO3304 treatment resulted in enhanced insulin secretion primarily by increasing the second phase of the insulin secretory response (i.e. 40 min time point). Together, these data demonstrate the critical role of Y1 receptor signaling as a negative regulator of insulin release in pancreatic β-cells under a physiological glucose load.
Enhanced islet transplantation efficiency employing Y1 deficienct islets
We next conducted a series of studies exploring the potential beneficial clinical effects of enhancing insulin secretion in situations of limited β-cell mass, through manipulation of the Y1 receptor system. We performed islet transplantation experiments and specifically investigated whether Y1 receptor-deficient islets could provide better metabolic control when compared to control WT islets. For this, alloxan-induced diabetic C57BL/6JAusb mice were transplanted with either a minimal amount of 60 islets originating either from WT or Y1−/− mice, respectively, or as a control for islet quality, with a sufficient (optimal) mass of 300 WT islets. Islets of comparable size were hand-picked and as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2c β-cell mass was not significantly different between Y1−/− or WT mice, therefore material with equal insulin content was transplanted. Blood glucose levels were then monitored for the next 20 days. As expected, mice receiving the optimal islet mass showed immediate restoration of blood glucose control (Fig. 1f), whereas mice receiving a minimal number of WT islets had only a slight trend to improved blood glucose control by day 15 post-transplantation, which never completely normalized (Fig. 1f, g). In marked contrast, mice transplanted with the minimal number of 60 Y1−/− islets showed significant glycemic improvement by day 5 post-transplantation and by day 7 blood glucose levels were comparable with the mice receiving the optimal islet mass transplant (Fig. 1f). Consistent with the improved glycemic control, glucose tolerance at day 5 post-transplantation was also significantly improved in mice that received the Y1−/− islets (Fig. 1h, i), which was due to the improved in vivo insulin secretory response of the Y1−/− islets (Fig. 1j, k). Improved in vivo insulin secretion was also highlighted by the superior insulin disposition index (DIo) of mice receiving Y1−/− islets; being 2.58 fold higher compared to mice receiving WT islets (DIo = 0.021 ± 0.0017 vs. 0.054 ± 0.019 for Y1−/− vs. WT, respectively; n = 4 mice per group). Together, these data demonstrate that reduced Y1 receptor signaling in islets is advantageous for the enhancement of insulin release, and this can have direct relevance to the clinical scenario of islet transplantation where donor islets are of limited supply.
Inhibition of Y1 receptor signaling improves islet transplantat outcomes
To prove whether these beneficial effects of lack of Y1 receptor signaling could also be induced pharmacologically, we first examined the impact of BIBO3304, a selective non-brain penetrable Y1 receptor antagonist, on glucose induced insulin secretion in vivo. C57BL/6JAusb mice were treated 2 h prior to a bolus glucose load orally with 0.5 μM BIBO3304, a dose known to have physiological action31, and serum insulin levels were assessed over the next 60 min. Mice that received BIBO3304 exhibited significantly increased serum insulin levels (Fig. 1l, m) confirming that blocking Y1 receptor signaling is able to enhance physiologically triggered insulin secretion. To further test whether this pharmacological intervention could improve the outcome of islet transplantation, we repeated the transplantation experiments using a minimal number of WT islets, and then treated half of the mouse cohort orally with BIBO3304 and the other half with placebo. As a control for islet quality, a group of mice were transplanted with an optimal islet mass. Recipient mice that were treated with placebo failed to achieve normoglycemia and remained diabetic throughout the course of the experiment (Fig. 2a, b). In contrast, mice transplanted with the minimal amount of WT islets and treated with BIBO3304 rapidly achieved normoglycemia (Fig. 2a). Strikingly, when antagonist treatment was stopped at day 10 post-transplantation these mice were able to maintain normoglycemia till the end of the experiment at day 60 (Fig. 2a). This suggests that transient inhibition of Y1 receptor signaling in the early period after islet transplantation is sufficient to normalize glucose homeostasis. Consistent with the improved glycemic control, glucose tolerance at day 5 post-transplantation was also significantly improved in the BIBO3304-treated group compared to the placebo group (Fig. 2c, d). Consistently, BIBO3304-treated mice also showed a superior DIo being 12.28-fold higher than placebo-treated mice (DIo = 0.066 ± 0.0082 vs. 0.819 ± 0.324 for placebo vs. BIBO3304, respectively; n = 4 mice per group). Analysis of BIBO3304-treated compared to untreated islet grafts did not reveal any obvious differences in islet morphology, apoptosis, graft vascularization, or endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response (Supplementary Figs. 3, 4a), however, the number of Ki67-positive β-cells in the BIBO3304-treated grafts was significantly increased (Fig. 2e, f). Together, these data demonstrate that the improved glycemic control in BIBO3304-treated mice was a consequence of increased insulin secretion and islet proliferative capacity in response to changes in physiological glucose levels (Fig. 2e–h).
In order to test the time dependence of Y1 receptor antagonism on islet transplantation outcomes, mice were transplanted with a minimal islet mass and half of the cohort were treated daily with BIBO3304 from day 1 and the other half of the cohort were treated with placebo. After 8 days the placebo-treated group also received BIBO3304 treatment. As seen before, mice that initially received placebo treatment were not able to achieve normal glucose levels (Fig. 2i): however, when switched over to BIBO3304 treatment at day 9, these mice showed a significant improvement in glycemic control (Fig. 2i), which was evident within the first few days post BIBO3304 treatment and by day 18 these mice achieved comparable glycemic control to mice that had been fed BIBO3304 from day 1 (Fig. 2i). Significantly, the improvement in glycemic control was maintained even after the subsequent discontinuation of BIBO3304 treatment at day 20 (Fig. 2i). To demonstrate that glycemic control was dependent on the islet grafts a cohort of these mice underwent survival nephrectomy at day 60, resulting in all mice having rapid reversal of glycemic control and a return to hyperglycemia (Fig. 2j). These data indicate that even delayed short-term Y1 receptor intervention can restore normoglycemia in previously non-functioning islet grafts. To test the long-term stability of the BIBO3304 effect upon islet graft function, an additional cohort of mice were transplanted with a minimal islet mass and treated with BIBO3304 for the first 10 days post transplant at which time treatment was discontinued. These mice exhibited stable normoglycemia for > 260 days. After survival nephrectomy all mice rapidly lost glycemic control and returned to hypergylcemia (Fig. 2k) demonstrating that short-term BIBO3304 treatment can provide stable, long-term improvement in islet graft function.
Y1 antagonism enhances human islet function and transplantat outcomes
We next investigated the physiological relevance of Y1 receptor signaling on insulin secretion in human islets. To investigate whether and which Y-receptors are present in human islets, we performed micro-array analysis and confirmed that consistent with mouse β-cells, the Y1 receptor is the only Y-receptor expressed at significant levels by human islets (Supplementary Table 1). In order to test the physiological relevance of Y1 receptor signaling in human islets, human islets were cultured and stimulated with glucose in the presence or absence of the Y1 receptor antagonist BIBO3304. Similar to rodent islets, human islets treated with BIBO3304 exhibited enhanced insulin secretion in response to a glucose challenge (Fig. 3a). We next determined whether pharmacological inhibition of Y1 receptor signaling with BIBO3304 would improve human islet function in vivo after islet transplantation. For this, human islets were transplanted into diabetic NOD RAG1−/− mice that were subsequently treated with BIBO3304 or placebo after transplant and their blood glucose levels were monitored. Placebo-treated mice did not show a return to normoglycaemic levels (i.e., < 10 mM glucose) over the monitoring period of 15 days (Fig. 3b, c). In contrast, mice treated with BIBO3304 showed significantly accelerated recovery of glucose control, reaching normal glucose levels by day 5. Consistent with the improved glycemic control, glucose tolerance was also significantly improved in the BIBO3304-treated group compared to the placebo group (Fig. 3d, e). This improved glycemic control in BIBO3304-treated mice was accompanied by increasedcirculating human insulin levels (Fig. 3f). Together these data demonstrate that the action of Y1 receptor signaling to modulate insulin secretion is conserved in human islet physiology.
To assess Y1 receptor antagonism as a potential treatment option in islet transplant patients a model that more closely mimics the human situation was chosen. For this, islets were transplanted across a full MHC mismatch (BALB/c islet −> C57BL/6 diabetic recipient) to mimic the situation of human islet transplantation with immune-mediated allogeneic rejection. Under this setting, the transplantation of the optimal 300 islets restored metabolic control whereas the minimal mass of 60 islets in mice treated with placebo did not (Fig. 3g). Importantly, the administration of Y1 receptor antagonist rescued the function of the limiting islet mass such that mice receiving 60 islets and treated with BIBO3304 show complete restoration of full metabolic function equivalent to mice that received 300 islets (Fig. 3g). These experiments demonstrate that Y1 receptor antagonism is able to rescue islet function even in the context of ongoing immune-mediated allograft rejection. Of note, the time to rejection for mice receiving 60 islets plus Y1 receptor antagonist or 300 islets was the same, suggesting BIBO3304 was not impacting on the immune response but rather enhancing islet function, consistent with our earlier results.
Y1 antagonism improves glycemic control and delays the onset of type 1 diabetes
Due to the success of BIBO3304 in controlling blood glucose in mice transplanted with a minimal number of mouse or human islets, we considered whether this would also be effective in other settings with reduced insulin secretory capacity. We therefore next determined whether Y1 receptor antagonism could extend the period of normoglycemia in autoimmune prone non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice. Abnormalities of β-cell function can be detected in NOD mice before they develop diabetes32 and this is also true in humans who have dysglycemia before they develop T1D33. Similarly, following diagnosis of T1D there is a period with reduced β-cell function that sometimes is still sufficiently effective for insulin treatment to be ceased for a period of time is called the ‘honeymoon period’. We tested if BIBO3304 would improve glycemic control in NOD mice prior to diabetes with potential application to reducing dysglycemia before and after diagnosis of diabetes and possibly prolonging the time to diagnosis of T1D and duration of the honeymoon period.
In order to test the responsiveness of NOD mice to Y1 receptor antagonism we treated 7-week-old NOD mice with a single dose of 0.5 μM BIBO3304 for 1 h before the onset of the dark phase (1900 hours) and measured glucose levels at 0900 hours the following day. Interestingly, NOD mice treated with BIBO3304 displayed a significant decrease in glucose levels (Placebo, 5.35 ± 0.11 mM; BIBO3304, 5.03 ± 0.09 mM; *P < 0.05), which is associated with a strong trend to increased insulin levels (Placebo, 73.31 ± 9.42 pM; BIBO3304, 103.2 ± 11.87 pM; P = 0.06), indicating that β-cells in a T1D environment are responsive to the inhibition of Y1 receptor signaling. To determine whether BIBO3304 treatment would prevent or delay the onset of diabetes in NOD mice, we treated a cohort of NOD mice daily with either BIBO3304 or placebo from 6 weeks of age onwards. As expected placebo-treated NOD mice exhibited worsening glucose control over time and eventually developed overt diabetes (Fig. 3h). In contrast, BIBO3304-treated NOD mice showed a marked resistance to the onset of hyperglycemia for an extended period (2–4 weeks) (Fig. 3h), but eventually these mice treated with 0.5 μM BIBO3304 also progressed to hyperglycemia (Fig. 3i). However, when these BIBO3304-treated NOD mice were diagnosed with hyperglycemia (glucose levels >12 mM), increasing the BIBO3304 dose 10-fold was able to reverse this trend and further delay the onset of overt hyperglycemia (Fig. 3i). Consistent with the concept that BIBO3304 treatment improves β-cell function, NOD mice treated with BIBO3304 showed significantly better glucose tolerance over the time course of BIBO3304 treatment at 15 and 19 weeks of age, respectively (Fig. 3j–m). In comparison, placebo-treated NOD mice showed a worsening glucose tolerance consistent with their progression to overt hyperglycemia and diabetes (Fig. 3j–m). The improvement in glycemic control provided by BIBO3304 at least in the early phase (12 weeks of age) was independent of effects on the immune system as there were no differences in T-cell and B-cell populations in placebo vs. BIBO3304-treated mice. In particular there was no evidence of a change in the speed of an autoimmune attack as there was no difference in critical immune markers associated with autoimmune diabetes in the spleen, pancreatic lymph nodes, and mesenteric lymph nodes (Supplementary Fig. 5). Furthermore, BIBO3304 treatment had no significant effect on the expression levels of classical ER stress-mediating gene-products in islets from NOD mice excluding this pathway as a likely reason for the observed improved islet function (Supplementary Fig. 6a). Investigating the degree of immune destruction in these NOD mice, insulitis scores revealed that overall there was no significant difference between placebo or BIBO3304-treated animals at 12 weeks of age (Fig. 3n) and again further into disease progression at 22 weeks of age (Fig. 3o), or β-cell area (Supplementary Fig. 6b). This data suggests that improving insulin secretion due to Y1 receptor antagonism is the main driver of the prolonged control of glucose homeostasis in the NOD mice. Together, these results suggest Y1 receptor antagonism may be beneficial clinically to prolong the honeymoon period in new-onset T1D patients by enhancing insulin secretion.
To investigate the general effects chronic antagonism of Y1 receptor signaling has on islets, we treated a set of 7-week-old WT mice with BIBO3304 or placebo for 7 weeks, upon which animals were sacrificed, pancreata isolated, and analyzed. While showing a slight trend, there was no significant increase in pancreas weight in the BIBO3304-treated mice (Fig. 4a) nor any difference in total islet numbers (Fig. 4b). Interestingly, however, islets from BIBO3304-treated mice appeared to be larger in size (Fig. 4c) and total islet area due to an increase of individual islet size was significantly greater in the BIBO3304-treated mice compared to the placebo group (Fig. 4d). This increased islet size was most likely due to increased β-cell proliferation consistent with the increased number of Ki67-positive cells seen in the BIBO3304 group (Fig. 4e). Taken together, this suggests that Y1 receptor antagonism in the β-cells may not only promote insulin secretion but also enhance β-cell proliferation.
Y1 receptor signaling regulates β-cell function via a cAMP dependent pathway
In order to gain mechanistic insight on the consequences of Y1 receptor signaling in islet cells we performed a series of in vitro experiments. Since the Y1 receptor interacts with Gi/o G-proteins, which act to inhibit adenylate cyclase activity and cAMP levels modulate insulin secretion, we investigated cAMP production in control and Y1−/− islets in response to glucose. For this we tested whether pharmacologically blocking Y1 receptor signaling in islets can reproduce this effect ex vivo. To mimic physiological conditions we treated islets isolated from WT mice with the GLP-1 receptor agonist ‘Exenatide’ in the presence of glucose to raise cAMP levels. As shown in Fig. 4f, cAMP was significantly upregulated in the presence of 100 nM Exenatide and 20 mM glucose compared to glucose alone. The addition of 50 nM PYY was able to significantly reduce the Exenatide-induced increase in cAMP and this inhibitory effect was abolished in the presence of the Y1 receptor specific antagonist BIBO3304 (Fig. 4f). To investigate whether the GLP-1-induced increase in cAMP could be further enhanced in the absence of Y1 receptor signaling, we also performed the experiment on islets derived from Y1−/− mice. The addition of Exenatide resulted in a further increase in cAMP levels in Y1−/− islets pretreated with 20 mM glucose (Fig. 4g). Importantly, the addition of PYY or PYY and BIBO3304 had no significant effect on reducing cAMP levels in the Y1−/− islets consistent with a Y1 receptor-dependent effect.
Taken together, these data demonstrate that Y1 receptor signaling can counteract the Exenatide-induced enhancement of insulin secretion via direct effects on cAMP production. Further support for this concept comes from studies where we could show that protein levels of phosphorylated cAMP responsive element-binding protein (pCREB) are significantly upregulated in islets of Y1−/− or BIBO3304-treated WT mice as determined by western blotting (Fig. 4h, i) and in situ immunofluorescence (Fig. 4j, k).
Since CREB expression may also be influenced by Ca2+ and Ca2+ is a vital part of the exocytosis of insulin containing secretory granules, we performed [Ca2+]i measurements to investigate whether Y1 receptor signaling is critical for these events. A repetitive stimulation with 11 mM glucose induced repeated [Ca2+]i increases in mouse single β-cells as expected and PYY (10 nM), added to the superfusion solution 5 min prior to the second glucose stimulation, did not affect [Ca2+]i responses to 11 mM glucose (Supplementary Fig. 7a). The ratio of the peak amplitude of the [Ca2+]i response to the second glucose stimulation (S2) compared to that of the first stimulation (S1), and the S2/S1 ratio was also unaltered by PYY (Supplementary Fig. 7b). Furthermore, PYY did not affect the oscillation of [Ca2+]i during the second phase response to 11 mM glucose (Supplementary Fig. 7c) nor did it influence the KCl (25 mM)-induced [Ca2+]i increases at 2 mM glucose in β-cells (Supplementary Fig. 7d, e). As such, Ca2+ does not seem to play a major role in PYY/Y1 receptor mediated downstream processes in β-cells suggesting that Y1 receptor signaling primarily inhibits the CREB-dependent pathway to influence insulin secretion.
We next investigated whether key cellular molecules known to be involved in the insulin secretion process are under the control of the CREB transcription factor. The expression of several genes involved in glycolysis such as the rate-limiting enzyme glucokinase34, the anaplerotic enzyme pyruvate carboxylase (Pc)35 and in mitochondrial oxidation process, malate dehydrogenase (Mdh2)36, ATP citrate lyase and 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (Hadh)37 are known to respond to CREB. Consistent with this, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) performed on RNA isolated from Y1−/− islets confirmed an increase in mRNA expression of these critical metabolic genes in the absence of Y1 receptor signaling (Fig. 4l). Absence of Y1 receptor signaling also increased the expression of CREB downstream target genes controlling mitochondrial oxidation including Mdh2, ATP citrate lyase, and Hadh (Fig. 4l). Consistent with this notion that Y1 receptor signaling via the cAMP/CREB pathway controls insulin secretion, repeating this analysis in WT islets that were treated with BIBO3304 revealed that while not all the genes investigated were upregulated a similar pattern of altered gene expression of glycolysis controlling genes was observed (Fig. 4m). It is not too surprising that the effects of Y1 receptor deletion, which occurred in the germline, may result in a more extended change in expression of β-cell specific genes than what could be expected from a short-term treatment regime using an antagonist. Interestingly, however, the effect that BIBO3304 has on the expression of the set of glycolysis controlling genes that are increased seems to be more pronounced and almost double suggesting modulating this set of genes is sufficient to produce the increase in insulin secretion.
In contrast to changes in these key metabolic genes, genes that influence the maintenance of the β-cell phenotype were not significantly altered (Supplementary Fig. 8a–c). Entry of glucose into the β-cell with subsequent glycolysis and mitochondrial oxidation is a critical trigger for the release of appropriate amounts of insulin in response to changes in physiological glucose. However, expression levels of Glut2, the key transporter governing glucose uptake into the β-cell and subsequent entry into glycolysis was not significantly changed in the β-cells of Y1−/− mice (Supplementary Fig. 8d), again suggesting that Y1 receptor signaling predominantly regulates cAMP levels and CREB activity, which via upregulation of enzymes that are central in controlling glycolysis plays a key role in the physiological control of insulin secretion.
By using genetic and pharmacological approaches our results reveal that Y1 receptors play an essential and conserved role in β-cell physiology by providing an inhibitory action in modulating insulin release in response to a glucose load. This finding also highlights a potential causal role for impaired Y1 receptor signaling in the development of metabolic diseases such as obesity and hyperinsulinemia. Importantly, we demonstrate that manipulating the Y1 receptor system via pharmacological intervention may be a useful therapeutic approach to boost β-cell function under conditions where insulin secretion is limited. Our findings have the potential for a direct clinical application in the context of pancreatic islet transplantation, which is emerging as an important therapy to treat T1D and hypoglycemic unawareness5 but is limited in its scope by the poor function of the transplanted islets after engraftment and scarcity of donor material. Indeed, with current best practice most islet transplant recipients require 2–3 islet transplants to achieve normal metabolic control with insulin independence38. Based on our studies here, by employing a Y1 antagonist as co-treatment with islet transplantation, the required number of islets to achieve the same level of insulin production could be significantly reduced thereby reducing the number of donors required per recipient and consequently increasing the number of patients who could benefit from islet transplantation. In addition to the potential for improving the current clinical practice of adult islet transplantation, Y1 receptor antagonism may also be applicable to newly emerging therapies of islet transplantation that take advantage of alternative islet sources, such as porcine (xenogeneic) or stem cell-derived (both stem cell and induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell) islets. As the effect of Y1 receptor antagonism is highly effective in the immediate period after transplant and can be suspended after a short treatment period, targeting the Y1 receptor brings the additional advantage of requiring only a temporary treatment regime.
All animal care and experiments were approved by the Garvan/St. Vincent’s Animal Ethics Committee. Y1lox/lox mice were generated as previously described39 and crossed with mice expressing the Cre recombinase gene under the control of the rat insulin-2 promoter Tg(Ins2-cre)25Mgn/J(INS2cre/+)40 to generate Y1lox/lox/INS2cre/+ mice. INS2cre/+ mice were also crossed onto Gt(ROSA)26Sor tm9(EGFP/Rpl10a)Amc/J mice (JAX stock# 024750) in order to produce β-cell specific expression of the EGFP–L10a fusion protein for mRNA isolation and qPCR analysis. For clarity, islet tissue from these mice is referred to as WT and Y1−/− respectively, throughout the text. Age-matched and sex-matched mice on a C57BL/6Ausb background were used for all experiments except stated otherwise. Female NOD mice were purchased from Australian BioResources Pty Ltd (ABR, Moss Vale, NSW, Australia). Mice were housed under a controlled temperature of 22 °C and a 12-hour light cycle (lights on from 0700 to 1900 hours) with ad libitum access to water and a standard chow diet (6% calories from fat, 21% calories from protein, 71% calories from carbohydrate, 14.0 MJ/kg, Gordon’s Specialty Feeds, Australia). To avoid the stress caused by gavage, specific Y1 receptor antagonist BIBO3304 (Tocris Bioscience) was dissolved in distilled water and administrated daily in a form of jelly for the duration stated in the text. This method of drug delivery was developed in our lab and described previously31. In brief, we trained mice to voluntarily eat a vehicle jelly before the start of an experiment. After 2–5 days training, over 95% of mice consumed the entire portion of jelly (195 μl for a 25 g mouse) within 1 min of being placed in the cage and maintained a high avidity for jelly throughout the study period. At the commencement of an experiment, mice received BIBO3304 containing jelly once per day for the time period indicated in each study, while control mice received vehicle jelly.
RNA extraction and quantitative RT-PCR
Pancreatic islets were isolated and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and RNA was extracted using Trizol Reagent (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Isolated mRNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using Superscript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen, Australia) and processed for qPCR with the Light-Cycler 480 Real-Time PCR system (Roche, Switzerland) for Gk, Tpi1,Acly, Pc, Mdh2, Hadh, Glut2, Pdx1, MafA, Nkx6.1, NeuroD1 as indicated in the Supplementary Table 2 and normalized with a housekeeping gene Ribosomal protein L19 (Rpl-19) (5′-CTCGTTGCCGGAAAAACA-3′ and 5′-TCATCCAGGTCACCTTCTCA-3′). Npy1r (Y1 receptor) gene (5′-CACAGGCTGTCTTACACG-3′ and 5′-GCGAATGTATATCTTGAAGTAG-3′). The amplification condition used in all the RT-qPCR experiment was: 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 20 s for 40 cycles.
Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion ex vivo
Pancreas from 8-week-old to 10-week-old WT and Y1−/− mice were perfused with cold liberase (Roche) solution via the common bile duct and subsequently pancreata were removed and incubated at 37 °C for 16 min. The digestion was stopped by addition of Krebs-Ringer Bicarbonate buffer containing 10% newborn calf serum followed by mechanical disruption of the pancreas and washing of the islets. Islets were further separated from other pancreatic tissue using a Ficoll-Paque PLUS (GE Healthcare) density gradient and hand-picked under a stereomicroscope. Islets were subsequently incubated in RPMI-1640 medium (containing 10% fetal calf serum, penicillin and streptomycin, HEPES, 11 mM glucose, and 2 mM glutamine) in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for 48 h. GSIS assays were performed as previously described41. Briefly, islets were pre-incubated for 1 h in HEPES-buffered KRB containing 0.1% BSA and 2 mM glucose. Experiments were performed in triplicate with batches of five islets incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 1 h in 130 μl KRB containing 0.1% BSA, supplemented with 2 mM, 11 mM, or 20 mM glucose or 2 mM glucose with KCl (25 mM) in with or without 100 nM Exenatide (GLP-1 receptor agonist, Byetta) and/or 50 nM PYY and/or 0.5 μM BIBO3304 as indicated in the text. Insulin release was determined by insulin RIA kit (Linco Research, St. Charles, MO, USA). Insulin DIo was calculated from the formula ∆I 0−I 30/∆G 0−G 30 × 1/fasting insulin; where 1/fasting insulin=serum insulin level determined by ELISA (pM) and G=blood glucose (mmol/l).
Glucose tolerance tests and in vivo GSIS
Glucose tolerance tests (GTT) were performed on 6 h-fasted mice that were administered i.p. with glucose (1 g/kg body weight). Blood glucose levels were assessed at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 90 min after glucose administration using a Accu-chek Go glucometer (Roche, Dee Why, Australia). Serum during GTT was collected and stored for subsequent insulin assays using insulin RIA kits (Linco Research). Fed and fasted serum insulin levels were also measured using insulin RIA kits (Linco Research). For islet transplantation, mice were fasted overnight and i.v. administered with glucose (1 g/kg body weight) and blood glucose levels were assessed at 0, 2, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 min after glucose administration using a glucometer. Blood samples during GTT were collected and stored for subsequent insulin assays using an ultra-sensitive commercially available ELISA kit (Crystal Chem, Downers Grove, USA). Human insulin levels during human islet transplantation were determined using human insulin ELISA kit (Mercodia AB, Sweden).
cAMP measurement assays
Isolated islets were incubated in RPMI-1640 medium (containing 10% fetal calf serum and penicillin and streptomycin, HEPES, 11 mM glucose, and 2 mM glutamine) in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for 24 h. Batches of 40 islets were washed with KRB buffer and subsequently incubated with KRB buffer containing 0.1% BSA and 2 mM glucose at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 1 h before the assay. Islets were cultured with 2 mM, 11 mM, or 20 mM glucose, 100 nM Exenatide (Byetta, AstraZeneca) in the presence of 0.5 mM IBMX (Sigma-Aldrich) and intracellular accumulation of cAMP was measured over a period of 1 h. Islets were lysed in 150 μl 0.1 M HCl for 20 min and cAMP levels were measured using the ‘Direct cAMP ELISA kit’ (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Final cAMP concentrations were normalized by total protein content.
Measurements of [Ca2+]i in single β-cells
Islets isolated from male C57BL/6Ausb mice were dispersed into single cells in Ca2+-free HKRB. The single cells were plated sparsely on coverslips and maintained for 1 day at 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator in Eagle’s minimal essential medium containing 5.6 mM glucose supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 100 U/ml penicillin. Dissociated single β-cells on coverslips were mounted in an open chamber and superfused in HKRB. Cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations ([Ca2+]i) in single β-cells were measured at 33 °C by dual-wavelength fura-2 microfluorometry with excitation at 340/380 nm and emission at 510 nm using a cooled charge-coupled device camera. The ratio image was produced on an Aquacosmos system (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan). Data were taken exclusively from the cells, which fulfilled the reported morphological and physiological criteria of β-cells42.
Immunofluorescent staining on grafts and/or pancreas
Insulin (Sigma-Aldrich; #I2018, produced in mouse, 1:500 dilution), insulin (H-86, Santa Cruz, #9168, produced in rabbit, 1:400 dilution), p-CREB (phospho-CREB-Ser133, Cell Signaling; #9198, 1:500 dilution), CD31 (Abcam; #ab28364, 1:50 dilution), and Ki67 (Ki67 [SP6], Thermo Fisher Scientific; #RM-9106, 1:250 dilution) immunofluorescence was performed on paraformaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded grafts, or pancreatic sections, as described previously43. Briefly, grafts or whole pancreas, fixed in 4% PBS-buffered paraformaldehyde overnight at 4 °C before being processed and embedded in paraffin. Sections were cut at 5 μm for pancreas and kidney grafts, deparaffinized, rehydrated, and incubated with a Target Retrieval Solution (pH = 6, DAKO Corp, Carpinteria, CA, USA) in a pressure cooker. Slides were then washed in distilled water and incubated with 5% goat serum in PBS containing 1% BSA for 1 h at room temperature. Subsequently sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C in hydration chambers with the respective primary antibody (1 h at room temperature for CD31). Slides were then washed in PBS and incubated with the respective secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. The slides were washed in PBS and cover slipped with ProLong Gold Antifade mounting medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Waltham, MA, USA). Sections were imaged via a Leica SP8 confocal microscope. Entire sections of the pancreas were scanned and imaged using the Leica LAS Power Mosaic (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). For quantification of Ki67-positive cells in the islet grafts from placebo or BIBO3304-treated mice, six sections separated by at least 150 μm were used for each mouse, n = 3 mice per group. Investigators were blinded to outcome assessment.
Isolated mouse islets were mechanically homogenized in ice cold RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Hepes [pH 7.4], 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 1% (v/v) sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% (v/v) SDS, 150 mM NaCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 50 mM NaF, 2 mM phenylmethysulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM sodium vanadate), and clarified by centrifugation (100,000×g for 5 min at 4 °C). Cell lysates were resolved by SDS–PAGE and immunoblotted with phospho-specific CREB antibody (phospho-CREB-Ser133, Cell Signaling; #9198, 1:1000 dilution) or alpha-tubulin monoclonal antibody (clone B-5-1-2, #T6074, Sigma-Aldrich, 1:1000 dilution) as a loading control.
To induce diabetes, 8–10-week-old recipient C57BL/6Ausb mice were i.v. injected with alloxan tetrahydrate (Sigma-Aldrich) in injectable grade water (20 mg/ml) at a dose of 110 mg/kg body weight. Mice with blood glucose values ≥18 mmol/l were selected as transplant recipients. Islets were isolated from pancreas of either Y1−/− mice or control donor mice and transplanted into the recipient diabetic mice (syngeneic) as previously described44. In brief, on the transplant day, islets were prepared from the pancreata of donor mice and either 300 or 60 handcounted islets were transplanted into individual recipient mice. For the transplant, the kidney was accessed by a left flank incision and brought into the wound by gentle blunt dissection. A small nick was made in the kidney capsule at the inferior renal pole and the islets were deposited through the nick toward the superior pole of the kidney. Blood glucose levels were monitored daily. Transplanted mice underwent different regimes as detailed in the text. Nephrectomy was performed at a specific postoperative day as indicated in the text or figures.
Treatment plan, monitoring and study endpoints in NOD mice
Seven-week-old female NOD mice were fed with placebo jelly or 0.5 μM BIBO3304 containing jelly daily. When a blood glucose level of > 12 mM was recorded in BIBO3304-treated mice, these mice were given an increased dose (5 μM BIBO3304) to examine the possibility of reverting the trend. In another experiment, female NOD mice were treated daily with either 0.5 μM BIBO3304 containing jelly or vehicle jelly. Glucose levels were monitored weekly prior to 12 weeks of age and twice per week after 12 weeks of age. In these mice a GTT was carried out at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post treatment or daily post hyperglycemia. Animals were also monitored daily for signs of deteriorating health, as indicated by weight loss, slow movement, hunched posture, and polyuria. Mice deemed morbid by the above criteria were sacrificed. Pancreas from 12-week-old or 22-week-old female NOD mice treated with BIBO3304 or placebo were formalin fixed, paraffin embedded, and stained with H&E to evaluate islet insulitis. The histology of the pancreatic islets was evaluated by using a bright field microscopy. The insulitis was scored in four levels. The total number of the islets in the preparations were taken into account together with the infiltration of lymphocytes. Representations of the different insulitis scores were shown as below: Grade 0 = no insulitis, representing normal islet morphology; Grade 1 = peri-islet insulitis, representing < 25% infiltration with inflammation concentrated around the islet; Grade 2 = intermediate insulitis, representing 25–50% of the islet was penetrated by inflammatory infiltrate; Grade 3 = intra-islet insulitis, representing 50–75% of the islet was penetrated by inflammatory infiltrate; and Grade 4 = complete islet insulitis, representing > 75% of the islet was penetrated by inflammatory infiltrate. The treatments were unknown to the scoring person to ensure blind evaluation.
Human islet isolation, transplantation, and treatment plan
We obtained approval for performing human islet studies from St Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research and St. Vincent’s Clinical School Human Research Ethics Committee. Consent for use of the islets for research was given by relatives of the donors. Isolated human islets were prepared from two independent deceased donors and purified using the modified method as previously described45, 46. Human islets were cultured overnight and transplanted of 1400 cultured islet equivalents into alloxan-induced NOD RAG1−/− diabetic mice as described previously47. In brief, the kidney was accessed by a left flank small incision and brought into the wound by gentle blunt dissection. A small nick was made in the kidney capsule at the inferior renal pole. The islets were gently placed through the nick toward the superior pole of the kidney. Subsequently, recipient mice were either orally administered with placebo or Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBO3304 (0.5 μM) daily and graft function was determined by monitoring fed blood glucose levels up to 18 days. Glucose tolerance tests (i.p. 1 g/kg body weight) were performed on day 7 post-transplantation. Nephrectomy was performed at postoperative day 18.
Cell suspensions of spleen and lymph nodes were prepared according to standard protocols and stained for FACS analysis in PBS containing 0.5% BSA, 2 mM EDTA, and 0.02% sodium azide using the following Abs (obtained from BD Pharmingen, unless otherwise stated): Pacific-Blue-conjugated anti-CD4, FITC-conjugated, or PerCP-Cy5.5-conjugated (eBioscience) anti-CD8, PerCP-Cy5.5-conjugated anti-B220, allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-CD44, FITC-conjugated, or PerCP-Cy5.5-conjugated (eBioscience) anti-CD62L, PE-conjugated CD25 (PC61.5), H-2K(d) Mouse IGRP 206-214 VYLKTNVFL AlexaFlour 647-Labeled Tetramer (NIH Tetramer Core Facility), I-A(g7) BDC2.5 mimotope AHHPIWARMDA PE-Labeled Tetramer (NIH Tetramer Core Facility). Samples were acquired on a LSRII Sorp (BD Biosciences) and data were analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star). Gating strategy: Following labelling events were gated on PI-lymphocytes (to exclude dead cells) using forward and side light scatter parameters, then gated for CD4+CD8−, or CD4−CD8+ events respectively. To assess the frequency of tetramer-positive events gates were drawn by setting the control tetramer gate to 0.1% and using this gate for the corresponding tetramer stained sample. Data is the percentage of tetramer-positive events among all CD4+ or all CD8+ cells, respectively.
All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. A two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to test difference between two groups of mice. Differences among groups of mice were assessed by two-way ANOVA or repeated-measures ANOVA. Bonferroni post hoc tests were performed to identify differences among means. F test was used to compare variances. Statistical analyses were assessed using Prism software (GraphPad Software 6.0 f, Inc, LaJolla, CA, USA). Sample size was predetermined based on the variability observed in prior experiments and on preliminary data. All experiments requiring the use of animals or animals to derive cells were subject to randomization based on litter. Investigators were not blinded to outcome assessment except were otherwise stated. Differences were regarded as statistically significant if *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 ****P < 0.0001.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia in the form of a Fellowship #1019734 a project grant #427661 to HH, a project grant #1130222 to STG and a project grant #1080473 to KL. This work received support from the Operational Infrastructure Support Scheme of the Government of Victoria. We thank Sara Litwak, Stacey Fynch, Tom Loudovaris, Felicia Reed, William Stanley, Cameron Kos, and Orvin Atthi for technical assistance.