Autophagy, a catabolic mechanism that involves degradation of cellular components, is essential for cell homeostasis. Although autophagy favours the lineage stability of regulatory T cells, the contribution of autophagy to the differentiation of effector CD4 T cells remains unclear. Here we show that autophagy selectively represses T helper 9 (TH9) cell differentiation. CD4 T cells lacking Atg3 or Atg5 have increased interleukin-9 (IL-9) expression upon differentiation into TH9 cells relative to Atg3- or Atg5-expressing control cells. In addition, the TH9 cell transcription factor, PU.1, undergoes K63 ubiquitination and degradation through p62-dependent selective autophagy. Finally, the blockade of autophagy enhances TH9 cell anticancer functions in vivo, and mice with T cell-specific deletion of Atg5 have reduced tumour outgrowth in an IL-9-dependent manner. Overall, our findings reveal an unexpected function of autophagy in the modulation of TH9 cell differentiation and antitumour activity, and prompt potential autophagy-dependent modulations of TH9 activity for cancer immunotherapy.
Macroautophagy (henceforth referred to as autophagy) is a highly conserved catabolic mechanism responsible for organelles turnover, membrane recycling and protein degradation1, 2. This dynamic process involves the formation of double-membrane vesicles termed autophagosomes, which engulf portions of the cytoplasm and then fuse with lysosomes for degradation. Under cell stress, autophagy can serve as a survival mechanism allowing the reuse of cytosolic constituents3. Autophagy is initiated through a well-conserved molecular pathway that involves the Atg5–Atg12 covalent protein complex and microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3, homologous to yeast Atg8)4. Subsequently, Atg16L1 promotes the conjugation of LC3 to phosphatidylethanolamine, resulting in autophagosome formation5.
Autophagy can also selectively target specific long-lived proteins, protein complexes, protein aggregates, various organelles and even intracellular microbes for destruction. This process, referred to as selective autophagy, can drive the degradation of specific proteins through recognition of ubiquitinated cargos via ubiquitin-binding domains of adaptor proteins6. Selective autophagy employs dedicated cargo adaptors such as p62, an adaptor protein that specifically targets, recruits and degrades a certain type of cargo in response to various intracellular or extracellular signals7. These adaptor proteins bind simultaneously to cargo and lipidated LC3 to selectively recruit the autophagy machinery to induce autophagosome formation6, 7. Selective degradation of key regulatory proteins in a timely and spatially regulated manner is essential for processes like gene expression, cell cycle progression, apoptosis and cell differentiation.
Autophagy has contrasting roles in cancer8, 9. While autophagy is required for immunogenic cell death process and acts as a tumour suppression mechanism ensuring the suppression of DNA damage and genomic instability as well as promoting protein quality control, autophagy also enables tumour cell survival in the tumour microenvironment and thereby supports tumour outgrowth8, 9. Accordingly, thyroid carcinoma patients carrying the autophagy-preventing single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) Thr300Ala of the ATG16L1 gene have improved clinical outcomes10. Likewise, the ATG16L1 Thr300Ala SNP is associated with a reduced risk of metastasis in colorectal cancer patients11.
Autophagy controls T-cell homeostasis, as illustrated by its requirement for the activation, proliferation and survival of T cells12,13,14. Autophagy also contributes to the formation of CD8+ memory T cells15, and couples environmental signals and metabolic homeostasis to protect lineage integrity and survival of regulatory T cells16. In line with this, autophagy induction following T-cell receptor (TCR) activation is shown to promote CD4 T-cell survival and antigen-dependent proliferation17. Autophagy is also observed in T helper 1 (TH1) and T helper 2 (TH2) cells upon differentiation from naive T cells17. Despite these observations demonstrating the potential relevance of the autophagic process in T cells, the functions of autophagy in effector T-cell differentiation remains incompletely understood.
Here we investigate the function of autophagy in the differentiation of effector CD4 T cells. We find that autophagy selectively restrains TH9 cell polarization. CD4 T cells lacking autophagy-essential genes Map1lc3b (encoding LC3 B), Atg3 or Atg5 have increased interleukin-9 (IL-9) secretion upon differentiation into TH9 cells. Under TH9-skewing conditions, the TH9 cell transcription factor PU.1 undergoes ubiquitination and degradation through p62-dependent selective autophagy. Importantly, inhibition of autophagy in TH9 cells enhances their anticancer functions in vivo, and mice with T cell-specific deletion of Atg5 have reduced tumour outgrowth in an IL-9-dependent manner. These results implicate selective autophagy in the modulation of TH9 cell differentiation and prompt a potential mechanism for enhancing TH9 cell antitumour properties.
Autophagy controls IL-9 secretion from TH9 cells
To test the contribution of autophagy in CD4 T-cell differentiation, we selectively suppressed T-cell expression of Atg5, a protein required for autophagy, by crossing Atg5-floxed mice to CD4 Cre mice and differentiated naive Atg5-deficient CD4 T cells (Atg5fl/fl*CD4-Cre) into TH1, TH2, TH17 and TH9 effector subsets as well as into regulatory T (Treg) cells using plate-bound anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibody stimulation and selective choice of differentiating cytokines (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b, c). We noted that Atg5 deficiency failed to affect the secretion of the TH1 and TH17 cytokines interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and IL-17 respectively and modestly induced IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 from TH2 cells without reaching a significant increase by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis of IL-4 and IL-5 cytokines (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig.1d). By contrast, we found that in the absence of Atg5, TH9 cell differentiation was markedly increased, as illustrated by a fivefold increase in IL-9 secretion from differentiating TH9 cells measured by ELISA (Fig. 1a). In line with Wei et al.16, we found that Treg cell differentiation was significantly decreased in the absence of Atg5 (Fig. 1b). These results were confirmed by real-time PCR (RT-PCR) analysis and intracellular cytokine staining (Fig. 1b, c). Similar results were also obtained using CD4 T cells from Atg5-floxed mice (Atg5fl/fl) transduced with a Cre overexpressing vector (Supplementary Fig. 1e, f). Because it was previously described that Atg5 affects T-cell proliferation and survival12, we investigated the impact of Atg5 deficiency on TH9 cell proliferation and survival. We found that TH9 cells from Atg5fl/fl*CD4-Cre mice expressed higher levels of Ki67 than those in WT TH9 cells, suggesting that Atg5 is dispensable for TH9 cell proliferation (Supplementary Fig. 1c, g, h). TH9 cells from Atg5-deficient mice exhibit enhanced apoptosis compared to WT cells as detected by annexin V and 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) staining (Supplementary Fig. 1b, i, j). These results are in line with the work of Chi and co-workers16 who showed that Atg7-deficient Treg cells undergo increased cell death but increased proliferation.
We have tested whether autophagy deficiency affects T-cell survival and proliferation of TH1, TH2, TH9, TH17 and Treg cells in our settings. In line with previous studies13, 16, we noted upon autophagy blockade an increase in cell death and proliferation of all the CD4+ T-cell subsets studied following activation except for TH17 cells that proliferated like controls 72 h after differentiation initiation (Supplementary Fig. 1k, l, m). Importantly, although these observations did not translate into significant alterations of the overall cytokine accumulation during the course of TH1, TH2 and TH17 cell differentiation, we noted a fivefold increase in IL-9 secretion from autophagy-deficient TH9 cells (Fig. 1a). Overall, this indicates that autophagy blockade favours TH9 cell differentiation rather than inhibiting the differentiation of other effector T-cell subsets.
To further test whether Atg5 affects TH9 cell differentiation, we knocked down Atg5 expression in wild-type (WT) CD4 T cells using small interfering RNA (siRNA). In line with our results obtained using conditional deficient mice, we found that preventing Atg5 expression in TH9 cells enhanced their secretion of IL-9 (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 1n). Moreover, Atg5 deficiency failed to enhance IL-9 expression in TH1, TH2, TH17 and Treg cells, suggesting that Atg5 deficiency does not skew other effector or regulatory subsets towards a TH9 differentiation programme (Supplementary Fig. 1o). We have eventually investigated the involvement of Atg3 and LC3, both of which are required for autophagy18, in TH9 cell differentiation using Atg3- and Map1lc3b-deficient T cells. In line with our results obtained with Atg5-deficient mice, we found that CD4 T cells lacking Atg3 or Map1lc3b featured enhanced ability to differentiate into TH9 cells compared to control cells (Fig. 1e, f), thereby demonstrating that deficiency of any key autophagy gene endows CD4 cells with augmented IL-9 secretion under TH9-skewing conditions. Overall, these results show that the expression of Atg5 in differentiating TH9 cells cell-intrinsically and specifically represses their secretion of IL-9.
While Atg5 is a key gene in the induction of autophagy19, it has been reported that Atg5 could also signal independently of autophagy20. Thus, to test further the putative involvement of autophagy during TH9 cell differentiation, we next assessed the induction of autophagy in differentiating TH9 cells upon in vitro differentiation. Because the most reliable indicator of autophagic activity is the autophagic flux defined by the whole process of autophagosome synthesis followed by delivery to and degradation within lysosomes, we have monitored the autophagic flux in differentiating TH9 cells. Since LC3-II is degraded in autophagolysosomes we monitored LC3 turnover to measure autophagic flux. For this, we have differentiated naive CD4 T cells into TH9 cells in the presence or not of chloroquine, which prevents lysosomal degradation21, 22, and assessed LC3-II expression representing the amount of LC3-II that is delivered to lysosomes for degradation. Our time-course experiment showed higher levels of LC3-II in differentiating TH9 cells treated with chloroquine compared to control cells at every time point, strongly suggesting that the full process of autophagy occurs in differentiating TH9 cells (Fig. 2a, b and Supplementary Fig. 2a). In addition, when comparing autophagy levels in TH cells, we found that TH9 cells featured comparable levels of lipidated LC3 (LC3-II) to TH2 and Treg cells, in which the induction of autophagy was previously shown16, 17 (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 2b). In the absence of Atg5, LC3-II expression is impaired during TH9 cell differentiation (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 2c), showing that Atg5 deficiency completely blunts autophagy in TH9 cells, thus demonstrating its capital function in TH9 autophagy process. Altogether, these results indicate that the genetic prevention of autophagy enhances TH9 cell generation in vitro.
Pharmacological modulation of autophagy affects TH9 cells
Several clinically approved drugs such as metformin and chloroquine have been shown to regulate autophagy23,24,25. Because our results showed that differentiating TH9 cells undergo autophagy, which represses their IL-9 secretion, we hypothesized that drugs affecting autophagy would also modulate TH9 cell differentiation. To test this, we have differentiated TH9 cells in the presence or not of metformin and chloroquine, which respectively induce and block autophagy23,24,25. We found that metformin and chloroquine respectively prevented and enhanced TH9 cell differentiation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3a, b). To track the effect of metformin and chloroquine on IL-9-expressing cells in real time and at the single cell level, we used IL-9-EGFP mice26. Differentiation of naive CD4 T cells obtained from IL-9-EGFP mice into TH9 cells in the presence of metformin decreased IL-9 secretion measured by ELISA and quantitative PCR (qPCR) (Fig. 3c) and both reduced the frequency and mean fluorescence intensity of IL-9-expressing cells 3 days following differentiation initiation (Fig. 3d). In line with our previous experiments, a similar series of studies performed with chloroquine yielded opposite results, confirming that autophagy blockade enhances TH9 cell differentiation (Fig. 3c, d).To test the possible effect of these drugs on proliferation and apoptosis, TH9 cells were stained with Ki67 or annexin V and 7-AAD. TH9 cells treated with chloroquine show a significant increase of apoptosis and a reduced proliferation compared to control cells (Supplementary Fig. 3). Metformin however did not affect cell death of differentiating TH9 cells but reduced their proliferation (Supplementary Fig. 3). Thus, chloroquine, despite its effects on TH9 cell proliferation and apoptosis, markedly enhances TH9 cell IL-9 secretion on a per-cell basis, ultimately resulting in enhanced IL-9 secretion from chloroquine-treated TH9 cells (Supplementary Fig. 3). This overall supports the fact that the chloroquine-driven blockade of autophagy in TH9 cells supports their IL-9 secretion.
We have eventually tested the effects of chloroquine on human TH9 cell differentiation. For this, human CD4 T cells were isolated from three different healthy blood donors and differentiated into TH9 cells in the presence or not of increasing doses of chloroquine. In line with our results obtained with mouse T cells, we found that chloroquine enhanced IL-9 secretion from human TH9 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3e). Collectively, although these results do not rule out any autophagy-independent effects of metformin and chloroquine on TH9 cell survival and proliferation, they strongly suggest that TH9 cell differentiation can be pharmacologically altered through the modulation of autophagy.
Autophagy blockade enhances PU.1 expression in TH9 cells
We next investigated the mechanism responsible for the modulation of TH9 cell functions by autophagy. Because autophagy deficiency was shown to alter the function of Treg cells through the induction of glycolysis16, we first monitored the phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 (pS6) and 4E-BP1, which denote the activation of the metabolic regulator mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1)27, in differentiating control or Atg5fl/fl*CD4-CreTreg cells and TH9 cells. In contrast to Treg cells where we found enhanced phosphorylated pS6 and 4E-BP1 in the absence of Atg5 as recently reported16, the phosphorylation levels of these two proteins were similar in TH9 cells independently of Atg5 expression (Supplementary Fig. 4). Thus, contrary to Treg cells, there is no contribution of mTORC1 in the autophagy-driven modulation of TH9 cell functions. We next monitored the expression of different transcription factors involved in TH9 cell polarization in differentiating control or Atg5fl/fl*CD4-Cre cells. Although the expression of Stat6, pStat6, IRF-4 and GATA-3 are not affected by autophagy deficiency, we noted that the expression of PU.1 protein, the TH9 cell master transcription factor encoded by Sfpi1 gene, was markedly enhanced in TH9 cells deficient for Atg5 compared to Atg5-expressing controls (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 5a, b, c). Accordingly, naive CD4 T cells differentiated into TH9 cells in the presence of metformin or chloroquine respectively featured repressed or enhanced levels of PU.1 protein compared to controls (Fig. 4b, c and Supplementary Fig. 5d). Importantly, Sfpi1 mRNA was unaffected by the presence of metformin or chloroquine during TH9 cell differentiation, suggesting a post-transcriptional effect of these drugs on PU.1 expression (Fig. 4d). Interestingly, the protein expression of the transcription factor GATA-3, which is essential for TH9 cell differentiation28, was unaffected by metformin or chloroquine, indicating that autophagy selectively affects PU.1 protein expression (Fig. 4b, c). Because Sfpi1 mRNA levels did not significantly change prior to the corresponding protein, we hypothesized that autophagy regulates PU.1 expression post-transcriptionally. To test this, we differentiated naive WT CD4 T cells in the presence or not of chloroquine into TH9 cells for 16 h and subsequently inhibited transcription using 5,6-dichloro-1-β-d-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole (DRB) and assessed Sfpi1 mRNA expression after 8 h. We found that, while DRB efficiently prevented Sfpi1 gene expression, it failed to block the chloroquine-induced enhanced expression of PU.1 protein (Fig. 4e, f and Supplementary Fig. 5e), indicating that the blockade of autophagy favours PU.1 expression in differentiating TH9 cells independently of transcription. We then tested whether autophagy affected the stability of PU.1 protein in differentiating TH9 cells. For this, we differentiated control or Atg5fl/fl*CD4-Cre cells into TH9 cells for 16 h and subsequently blocked translation using cycloheximide and kinetically monitored PU.1 degradation by western blot. We found that the degradation of PU.1 was notably reduced in Atg5fl/fl*CD4-Cre cells compared to control cells, indicating that the absence of autophagy prolongs PU.1 protein half-life in TH9 cells. Indeed, the absence of Atg5 promotes PU.1 protein stability, enhancing its half-life from 3 to more than 6 h (Fig. 4g, h and Supplementary Fig. 5f). To investigate the subcellular localization of PU.1 protein during TH9 cell differentiation we performed a kinetic experiment in TH9 cells from WT and Atg5-deficient mice followed by a subcellular fractionation. The expression of PU.1 was then analysed in nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions by western blot. In WT TH9 cells, PU.1 is mainly nuclear with an important nuclear expression from 8 to 48 h of differentiation, according to its function as transcription factor and master regulator of the TH9 programme. Interestingly, in the absence of Atg5, PU.1 protein expression is higher in both fractions compared to WT cells (Supplementary Fig. 6). PU.1 can be easily detected in the nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions of the cells from 8 h of differentiation (Supplementary Fig. 6). Overall, these results demonstrate that preventing autophagy in TH9 cells leads to enhanced stability of the TH9 cell transcription factor PU.1.
Selective autophagy targets PU.1 for degradation
P62 protein, a selective autophagy adaptor, is removed from the cytoplasm upon autophagy6, 29, 30. This process is responsible for the selective degradation of proteins that bind to p626, 29, 30. Because our observations indicated a selective degradation of PU.1 in TH9 cells, we have interrogated the contribution of p62-dependent selective autophagy in TH9 cell differentiation. For this, we first monitored p62 and PU.1 expression during the course of TH9 cell differentiation. Western blot analysis showed that p62 expression was induced in TH9 cells and peaked 16 h after the initiation of differentiation (Figs. 5a, b and Supplementary Fig. 7). As a selective autophagy adaptor, p62 is known to be degraded through autophagy6, 29, 30. Accordingly, kinetic monitoring of the total cellular expression levels of p62 inversely correlates with the autophagic activity during the course of TH9 cell differentiation (Fig. 5c), thereby suggesting that in TH9 cells p62 is also degraded through autophagy.
Because PU.1 is selectively degraded during TH9 differentiation, we next tested the putative interaction between PU.1, LC3-II and p62 in TH9 cells. For this, we first used a proximity ligation assay (PLA). We found that PU.1 interacts with LC3-II and p62 in TH9 cells, whereas no PLA foci were detected with control antibodies (Fig. 5d, e). Moreover, we also checked by PLA if other TH9 transcription factors are recruited by p62 and found no interaction for Stat6 or GATA-3 and a weak interaction for IRF-4 compared to PU.1 suggesting that, in TH9 cells, PU.1 is preferentially recruited by p62 (Supplementary Fig. 8a, b). Immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the formation of a PU.1-p62 complex in TH9 cells treated in the presence of chloroquine (Fig. 5f and Supplementary Fig. 9a). Importantly, we also found that PU.1 was polyubiquitinated (Fig. 5g and Supplementary Fig. 9b), which is an essential mark to target a protein for selective autophagy degradation. We next analysed the PU.1 complexes in TH9 cells treated with chloroquine by mass spectrometry. As previously described31, PU.1 interacts with other transcription factors, mRNA splicing factors and RNA binding proteins (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 8c), showing that PU.1 is part of different complexes, and hence suggesting a variety of functions for this transcription factor in TH9 cells. Importantly, mass spectrometry analysis of PU.1 complexes revealed that p62 interacts with PU.1 (Table 2). p62 is known to bind to polyubiquitinated protein cargos via an ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain7, and to autophagy machinery via a LC3-interacting region (LIR), thus making a bridge between polyubiquitinated cargos and autophagosomes. To test whether p62 interacts with PU.1 through its UBA domain we used a coupled transcription/translation in vitro system to generate p62 proteins labelled with biotinylated lysine. We synthesized both full-length p62 (p62_FL) and p62 lacking the UBA domain (p62_UBA∆). These two proteins were subsequently incubated with total extracts from TH9 cells differentiated for 24 h. The binding of endogenous PU.1 was tested in a pull-down assay and revealed using western blot analysis. Importantly, we found that UBA truncation significantly impaired p62 ability to recruit PU.1 without affecting its interaction with LC3-II (Fig. 5h, i and Supplementary Fig. 9c). Moreover, mass spectrometry analysis also reveals that PU.1 interacts with different K63 E3 ubiquitin ligases such as Ubr5, Hectd1 and Wwp2 (Table 2). As ubiquitination can target proteins for selective autophagy-dependent degradation with K63 ubiquitination32, we have assessed PU.1 ubiquitination by PLA and found enhanced PU.1 K63 ubiquitination in TH9 cells treated with chloroquine, suggesting that PU.1 is preferentially degraded through autophagy in TH9 cells (Fig. 5j). In line with this result, pharmacological inhibition of the proteasome with MG132, a proteasome inhibitor, failed to enhance PU.1 expression in differentiating TH9 cells, confirming that PU.1 degradation in TH9 cells is primarily driven through autophagy (Supplementary Fig. 10). To test the relevance of p62-dependent degradation of PU.1 in TH9 cell differentiation, we silenced p62 expression in differentiating TH9 cells with a siRNA preventing p62 expression. In line with our hypotheses, we found that p62 inhibition shown by western blot enhanced TH9 cell differentiation as illustrated by enhanced IL-9 secretion (Fig. 5k, l and Supplementary Fig. 11a, b). Importantly, p62 inhibition led to increased PU.1 expression (Fig. 5m, n and Supplementary Fig. 11c). Altogether, these findings indicate that the p62-dependent degradation of the PU.1 transcription factor through selective autophagy represses TH9 cell differentiation.
Autophagy blockade enhances TH9 cell anticancer functions
We and others have shown that TH9 cells harbour superior anticancer properties compared to those of TH1 or TH17 cells upon adoptive transfer in vivo33, 34. Because we found that autophagy blockade can enhance TH9 cell differentiation, we have examined the ability of TH9 cells differentiated in conditions preventing autophagy to suppress melanoma tumour growth in vivo. For this, B16-OVA cells (ovalbumin (OVA)-transfected B16F10 melanoma cancer cells) were injected intravenously (i.v.) into C57BL/6 mice along with CD4 T cells isolated from OT-II mice, which have a TCR specific for the OVA peptide (323–339) presented by major histocompatibility complex class II molecules, treated ex vivo with chloroquine and polarized into TH9 cells. The enumeration of the number of lung tumour foci after 14 days revealed that chloroquine-treated TH9 cells featured enhanced anticancer effects over control TH9 cells (Fig. 6a). In addition, by using CD4 T cells from TCR transgenic mice recognizing tyrosinase-related protein 1 (TRP-1)35, a melanocyte differentiation antigen naturally expressed by B16F10 melanoma cells, we also found that the anticancer activity of TH9 cells was similarly enhanced by chloroquine in the non-OVA B16F10 tumour model (Fig. 6b). To further investigate the links between TH9 cells and autophagy in a cancer setting, we implanted B16-OVA tumour cells subcutaneously (s.c.) into control or Atg5fl/fl*CD4-Cremice. We found that mice with selective Atg5 deficiency in CD4 T cells featured reduced tumour growth over controls (Fig. 6c). Importantly, anti-IL-9 antibody treatment abrogated the beneficial effect of autophagy deficiency in CD4 T cells, proving that the anticancer effect is driven by enhanced TH9 cell function (Fig. 6c). Similar results were noted in the MC38 colon adenocarcinoma tumour model (Fig. 6d). By analysing the B16-OVA tumour infiltrate, we found enhanced frequency of IL-9-producing CD4 tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). In vitro stimulation of TILs with OVA323–339 peptide led to marked increase of IL-9 from stimulated CD4 TILs, as detected by ELISA and qPCR (Fig. 6e). IL-9 has been shown to favour CD8 T-cell activation in a model of pulmonary melanoma in mice36. Accordingly, tumour infiltrate analysis showed enhanced frequency of IFN-γ-producing CD8 TILs in our system. Moreover, in vitro stimulation of TILs with OVA257–264 peptide also led to marked increase of IFN-γ from stimulated CD8 TILs as detected by ELISA and qPCR (Supplementary Fig. 12a). Finally, we obtained similar results with MC38 TILs from control or Atg5fl/fl*CD4-Cre mice (Fig. 6f and Supplementary Fig. 12b). Altogether, these results show that the suppression of autophagy in TH9 cells increases their ability to induce anticancer immune responses in vivo.
In this study we show that induction of autophagy in effector CD4 T cells selectively represses TH9 cell differentiation through a p62-dependent degradation of the TH9 cell master transcription factor PU.1. Accordingly, CD4 T cells lacking Atg3, Atg5 or LC3-II feature increased IL-9 secretion relative to control cells upon differentiation into TH9 cells. Moreover, pharmacological blockade of autophagy using chloroquine enhances both mouse and human TH9 cell differentiation. During TH9 cell differentiation, the TH9 cell master transcription factor PU.1 is K63-ubiquitinated and recruited by p62, which targets PU.1 for degradation through selective autophagy. Finally, genetic or pharmacological blockade of autophagy in TH9 cells not only enhances their anticancer functions in an IL-9-dependent manner against melanoma upon adoptive transfer but also in vivo in both established colon cancer and melanoma.
TH9 cells were initially coined by Kuchroo and Stockinger laboratories as proinflammatory cells that contribute to tissue inflammation and defence against parasites28, 37. Subsequently, this CD4 T-cell subset has gained further interest because of its potent anticancer properties, especially upon adoptive transfer into melanoma-bearing mice33, 34, 38, 39. However, the regulation of TH9 cell development in the tumour microenvironment is still incompletely understood. We here demonstrate the biological importance of the regulation of TH9 cells by autophagy in tumours. Our results suggest that in the tumour microenvironment TH9 cells undergo increased autophagy leading to decreased IL-9 expression. While the tumour-derived factors affecting TH9 cell induction remain to be fully characterized, our findings may begin to explain the low abundance of TH9 cells in tumours and why they fail to drive complete tumour clearance in the absence of additional therapeutic intervention.
PU.1 is an ETS family transcription factor that is induced by transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) during TH9 cell differentiation and is essential for TH9 cell generation as illustrated by the inability of PU.1-deficient CD4+ T cells to produce IL-9 upon TH9 cell differentiation40. Interestingly, previous findings indicated that PU.1 selectively regulated IL-9 production in differentiating TH9 cells40. Our findings accordingly show that during TH9 cell differentiation the increased PU.1 protein level upon genetic or pharmacological inhibition of its degradation by autophagy enhances TH9 cell-derived IL-9, but not IL-10 or IL-21, secretion. Protein inclusions observed in the animal cells with defective autophagy are enriched in ubiquitin22. We similarly observed an accumulation of ubiquitinated PU.1 protein in TH9 cells treated with chloroquine. We also found that, through its UBA domain, p62 is able to bind ubiquitinated PU.1 and interacts with LC3-II. Our work thus suggests that PU.1 is selectively degraded during TH9 cell polarization through autophagy. While these results may contrast with previous studies indicating that PU.1 has a PEST domain and could thus be degraded by the proteasome, it is noteworthy that truncation of the PU.1 PEST domain did not lead to protein stabilization41, and treatments with proteasome inhibitors such as lactacystin only partially inhibited PU.1 degradation in F5-5 erythroblasts42. Eventually, we found that the differentiation of TH9 cells upon proteasome inhibition with MG132 failed to stabilize PU.1 protein, suggesting that in TH9 cells the degradation of PU.1 is predominantly driven through selective autophagy.
Chi and co-workers16 recently showed that autophagy affects the stability of Treg cells by coupling environmental cues and metabolic homeostasis. Here we show that autophagy can also impair TH9 cell stability but through an mTORC1-independent mechanism. Indeed, Atg5-deficient TH9 cells do not show increased mTORC1 activity. This observation suggests that autophagy can regulate CD4 T-cell biology in many ways that remain largely misunderstood. For instance, Kabat et al.43 elegantly reported how autophagy differentially regulates Treg and TH2 cells to control intestinal inflammation. They found that while Atg16l1-deficient Treg cells showed significant decreased survival compared to WT Treg cells, Atg16l1-deficient TH2 cells have increased survival. The authors attribute this observation to the sensitivity of T cells, which tend to shift from glycolysis when autophagy is affected to environmental perturbations in the autophagy pathway. Autophagy deficiency in Treg cells upregulates metabolic regulators and glycolysis, thus impairing Treg cell survival16. In contrast to Treg cells, TH2 cells were shown to display an increased glycolytic rate44. This enhanced glycolytic metabolism used by TH2 cells makes them resistant to the metabolic changes triggered by autophagy deficiency. One important observation is that, like in TH2 cells, GATA-3 expression is essential for TH9 but not for Treg cell differentiation28. Meanwhile, expression of Gata3 is linked to induction of glycolysis after TCR activation in T cells and orchestrates essential metabolic adaptations enforced by autophagy deficiency45. Thus, differential expression of factors such as GATA-3 may lead to different metabolic responses in the absence of autophagy in CD4 T cells and explain why TH9 cells behave like TH2 cells regarding glycolysis.
Autophagy is essential to control inflammation46,47,48 this is exemplified by the ability of the amino acid sensor GCN2 to control gut inflammation through autophagy induction in CD11c antigen-presenting cells as well as epithelial cells, resulting in the repression of TH17 cell responses49. In humans, polymorphisms in several autophagy-related genes, including IRGM, LRRK2, SMURF1 and ATG16L1, leading to autophagy deficiency are linked to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) susceptibility50. Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (UC) are the two most common forms of IBD. Strikingly, recent studies have shown an important function of TH9 cells in driving UC. TH9 cells expressing PU.1 were found in the gut mucosa of patients with UC as well as target cells expressing IL-9 receptor in the intestinal epithelium of IBD patients, suggesting that TH9 cells are relevant for the pathogenesis of IBD in humans51, 52. Moreover, TH9 transcription factor PU.1 and IL-9 expression were shown to be crucial for the development of experimental colitis in two different mouse models28, 53. Our findings that autophagy induction in TH9 cells reduces PU.1 stability and represses TH9 cell differentiation therefore suggest that autophagy prevents Th9 cell differentiation to limit inflammation.
Given the strong effector functions harboured by TH9 cells, we believe that the identification of autophagy as a factor dictating IL-9 secretion from TH9 cells provides significant insights to design new therapies not only against cancer but also to alleviate the course of allergic and autoimmune diseases. Moreover, these findings may have implications for the consideration of chloroquine for antitumour immunotherapy. Given the strong antitumour activity of TH9 cells in vivo, our findings could also be exploited for the adoptive T-cell therapy of cancer.
All animals were bred and maintained according to both the FELASA (Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations) and the Animal Experimental Ethics Committee Guidelines (University of Burgundy, Dijon, France and Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China). Animals were used between 6 and 12 weeks of age. Female C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (France) and Joint Ventures Slipper BK Experimental Animal (Shanghai, China). Mice were housed in specific pathogen-free facilities, and the experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (Hangzhou, China) and of University of Burgundy (Dijon, France). Whenever required, animals were euthanized by CO2 exposure. TCR transgenic mice in which CD4+ T cells recognize OVA-derived antigen (OT-II) were provided by the CDTA (Cryopréservation, Distribution, Typage et Archivage animal, Orléans, France). TCR transgenic mice in which CD4+ T cells recognize the TRP-1 antigen35, CD4-Cre mice and Atg5fl/fl mice were respectively purchased from JAX (stock numbers 8684 and 17336) and RIKEN (RBRC02975). Floxed Atg3 mice and ER-Cre mice were kindly provided by P. Youwen He (Duke University). Atg3fl/fl mice were bred with ER-Cre mice to generate Atg3fl/flER-Cre mice. To induce Atg3 deficiency Atg3fl/fl ER-Cre mice were intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected with 100 μg tamoxifen (Sigma) for 3 consecutive days. LC3-B-deficient mice were kindly provided by Professor Zhihua Chen (Zhejiang University). IL-9-EGFP mice26 were provided by Professor Richard Flavell. All transgenic mice used were on a C57BL/6 background and were age-matched with WT controls for experiments. Male mice were used for experiments using mice having CD4 T cells recognizing the TRP-1 antigen. Otherwise, female mice were used.
Tumour growth experiments
B16F10, B16-OVA melanoma and MC38 colon adenocarcinoma cells were cultured at 37 °C under 5% CO2 in RPMI-1640 with glutamax-1 (Lonza) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) fetal calf serum (Lonza), 1% penicillin, streptomycin, amphotericin B (Gibco), 4 mM HEPES (Gibco) and 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Gibco). B16-OVA and MC38 cells were kindly provided by Dr Rosenblatt (University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA) and Professor Smyth (QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia), respectively. B16F10 cells were obtained from ATCC. All cells were routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination using Mycoalert Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Lonza, LT07-318) and found negative. 1×5.105 B16-OVA or 1×106 MC38 cells were injected s.c. into mice. In vivo IL-9 neutralization was achieved by i.p. injection (10 mg per kg body weight) of anti-IL-9 neutralizing antibody (MM9C1; BioXcell) on days −1 and 0 and twice a week following tumour implantation. As control we used control mouse IgG2a (in Vivo mAb Mouse IgG2a Isotype Control BioXcell BE0085). Tumour size was measured three times a week during 20 days following tumour implantation using a calliper. Animals with ulcerated tumours or with tumours above 300 mm2 in size were killed for ethical reasons. TILs were prepared by enzyme digestion with 1 mg ml−1 collagenase (Roche), 0.5 mg ml−1 DNase I and 25 μg ml−1 hyaluronidase (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 °C for 30 min, followed by Percoll (GE Healthcare) gradient purification and analysed by flow cytometry, ELISA and qRT-PCR after stimulation with OVA (323–339) or OVA (257–264) peptides (Proimmune) at a final concentration of 10 µg ml−1 and 20 µg ml−1 respectively for the B16-OVA tumour model. For the MC38 in vivo model, TILs were stimulated with 50 ng ml−1 of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma-Aldrich) and 1 μg ml−1 of ionomycin (Sigma-Aldrich).
Alternatively, 5×105 B16-OVA and 2×106 effector OT-II TH9 cells differentiated in the presence or in the absence of chloroquine (20 μM) were injected i.v. into C57BL/6 mice. Lung tumour foci were enumerated after 14 days in a blinded fashion. Similarly, 5×105 B16F10 and 5×104 effector TRP-1 TH9 cells differentiated in the presence or in the absence of chloroquine (20 μM) were injected i.v. into mice. Lung tumour foci were enumerated after 14 days in a blinded fashion.
In vitro T-cell differentiation
Naive CD4+ T cells (CD4+CD62LhiCD44lo) were obtained from spleens and lymph nodes of mice. Isolated naive T cells were routinely 98% pure. CD4+ T cells were purified from spleen and lymph nodes with anti-CD4 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec), and then were further sorted as naive CD4+CD62Lhi T cells by flow cytometry with antibodies anti-CD4-FITC (RM4-4, BD Biosciences) and anti-CD62L-Alexa 700 (MEL-14, BD Biosciences). Isolated naive CD4+ T cells were stimulated with plate-bound antibodies against CD3 (145-2C11, 2 μg ml−1, BioXcell) and CD28 (PV-1, 2 μg ml−1, BioXcell) and polarized into effector CD4+ T lymphocyte subsets without cytokines (TH0 cells), or with IL-12 (20 ng ml−1) for TH1 cells, or with IL-4 (20 ng ml−1) for TH2 cells, or with TGF-β (2 ng ml−1) and IL-6 (25 ng ml−1) for TH17 cells, or with mouse TGF-β (2 ng ml−1) and IL-4 (20 ng ml−1) for TH9 cells. In some experiments, metformin or chloroquine were added (Sigma-Aldrich, France). Cells were classically harvested on day 3 (unless otherwise specified) for detection of cytokines by ELISA and RT-qPCR analysis. For human in vitro T-cell differentiation, naive T cells were sorted from healthy donors and stimulated with plate-bound antibodies against CD3 (5 μg ml−1, BioXcell) and CD28 (5 μg ml−1, BioLegend) and polarized into TH9 cells with TGF-β (10 ng ml−1) and IL-4 (5 ng ml−1) (R&D systems).
Transient transfection of naive CD4+ T cells was performed in vitro using Lipofectamin RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 5×105 cells were plated in 96-well plates, and siRNAs were transfected at 25 nM final concentration for 24 h. Then, 24 h after transfection, CD4+ T cells were stimulated with plate-bound anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies, differentiated into TH9 cells as described above and cultured for an additional 24 or 72 h before analysis with Silencer Select Predesigned siRNA specific for murine Atg5 (ID: 161983, Ambion, Life Technologies) or murine sqtsm1 (siGENOME Mouse Sqstm1 ((18412) D-047628-03-0020 GE Healthcare, Dharmacon) or Silencer Negative Control No. 1 (Sigma SIC001).
Retroviral infection of CD4 T cells
Retrovirus preparation was performed in Plat-E cells. Plat-E cells were transfected with 7.5 μg pMX-IRES-GFP containing Cre gene, the media were replaced with fresh medium after 10 h and retrovirus supernatant was collected after additional 72 h.
Naive CD4 T cells from Atg5fl/fl mice were stimulated with 2 μg ml−1 anti-CD3/CD28 overnight. Then, the retrovirus was added to the cells, followed by 4 h of incubation at room temperature and removal of the retrovirus. The CD4 T cells were cultured in different T helper cell-polarized conditions for 5 days.
Measurement of cytokines
After 72 h of polarization, cell culture supernatants were assayed by ELISA for mouse IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-17 and IL-9 (BioLegend) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
For intracellular staining, cells were cultured for 3 days, restimulated for 2 additional days and then stimulated for 4 h at 37 °C in culture medium containing PMA (50 ng ml−1; Sigma-Aldrich) and ionomycin (1 μg ml−1; Sigma-Aldrich). After staining for surface markers and 7-AAD, cells were fixed and permeabilized according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Cytofix/Cytoperm kit, BD Biosciences), and then stained for intracellular products. Monoclonal antibodies used for flow cytometry analyses were as follows: fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-CD4 (GK1.5, BD Biosciences, dilution 1:300), PC7-conjugated CD8 (BD Biosciences, dilution 1:300), allophycocyanin (APC7)-conjugated CD45 (BD Biosciences, dilution 1:300), Brilliant Violet (BV421)-conjugated Foxp3 (BD Biosciences, dilution 1:100), phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated IFN-γ (BD Biosciences, dilution 1:300), PE-conjugated IL-4 (BD Biosciences, dilution 1:300), APC-conjugated anti-IL-9 (RM9A4, BioLegend, dilution 1:100) and APC-conjugated IL-17A (Pharmingen, dilution 1:300). All events were acquired by a BD LSR-II cytometer equipped with BD FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences) and data were analysed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).
RIPA lysis for western blot (WB): purified naive T cells were differentiated into TH2, TH9 and Treg cells. Cell pellets were incubated in five volumes of RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% Nadeoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 1 mM EDTA, protease inhibitors) for 45 min on ice. After centrifugation at 16,000×g for 15 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was recovered for WB analysis.
Low salt (LS) lysis for immunoprecipitation: purified naive T cells were differentiated for 24 h into TH9 cells in the presence or in the absence of chloroquine. Cell pellets were incubated in two volumes of LS buffer (10% glycerol, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.1 M KCl, 0.5% NP-40, protease inhibitors) for 10 min. Centrifugation at 16,000×g for 15 min at 4 °C was used to recover the supernatant for immunoprecipitation analyses.
Protein concentration was assessed using the Bio-Rad DC protein assay kit. Proteins were then denaturated, loaded and separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred on nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher and Schuell). After blocking with 5% milk in phosphate-buffered saline and 0.1% Tween-20 (BST), membranes were incubated overnight with primary antibody diluted in BST washed and incubated for 1 h with secondary antibody diluted in BST/5% milk. After additional washes, membranes were incubated with luminol reagent (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany) and exposed to Bio-Rad molecular imager ChemiDoc.
Total purified naive CD4 T cells were differentiated for 24 h into TH9 cells. Cell lysate was obtained by LS lysis as described above. Then, 1 ml of protein lysate (8 μg/μl) was pre-cleared by incubation with 100 μl of protein A/G beads (Invitrogen) on a wheel for 1 h at 4 °C. After 1 min of centrifugation at 400×g the lysate was recovered for the immunoprecipitation (20 ml of pre-clear lysate corresponding to the input was conserved at −20 °C). Next, 500 μl of the pre-cleared lysate was incubated with 10 μg of PU.1 antibody or control IgG rabbit antibody (Sigma) on a wheel for 2 h at 4 °C. A total of 50 μl protein A/G beads were added before incubating on a wheel for 1 h at 4 °C. Finally, the beads were collected by centrifugation, washed three times in LS buffer, and analysed by WB.
Protein pull-down by biotinylated p62 proteins
RT reactions were performed using The SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Life Technologies) and total RNA from TH9 cells at 24 h of differentiation. PaltinumTaq DNA polymerase high fidelity (Invitrogen) was used for PCR amplification of desired fragments corresponding to full-length p62 (p62_FL) and p62 lacking the UBA domain (p62_UBA∆). All forward primers had a T7 promoter sequence: 5′-taatacgactcactatagggaga-3′ while reverse primer had a TAA stop codon. The primers were:
p62_FL: forward 5′-ataaaagctgggctctcggc-3′; reverse: 3′-tcacaatggtggagggtgctt-5′ and p62_UBA∆: forward 5′-atggcgtcgttcacggtgaa-3′; reverse: 3′-cttcagccctgtgggtcctt-5′.
Synthetic p62_FL and p62_UBA∆ proteins were then generated using TnT Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation Systems (Promega L1170) combined with biotinylated lysine (Transcend tRNA Promega L5061) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. These two proteins were subsequently incubated with total extracts from TH9 cells differentiated for 24 h for pull-down assay. For this we used the Pierce Pull-down Biotinylated-protein: protein interaction kit (Thermo Scientific 21115) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The binding of endogenous PU.1 and LC3-II was revealed by western blots.
1×106 TH9 cells differentiated for 8, 16, 48 and 72 h were pelleted at 1,800 r.p.m. for 5 min. The pellet was resuspended in 50 µl of buffer A (10 mM KCl, 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 250 mM sucrose and protease inhibitors (Complete, Roche)) and after a quick vortex cells were kept on ice for 30 min. The mixture was then flushed a few times using 26G needle. Centrifugation at 1,000×g for 10 min at 4 °C allowed us to recover the supernatant containing the cytoplasmic fraction while the nuclear fraction was pelleted. Finally, the nuclear pellet was sonicated for 6 min (1-min ON and 1-min OFF) at high intensity using the Bioruptor sonicator.
Mass spectrometry analysis
Purified naive T cells were differentiated into TH9 cells for 24 h, and endogenous PU.1 complex was immunopurified as described above. PU.1 complex was then separated on a 4 to 12% polyacrylamide gel (Invitrogen) and stained with coomassie from Bio-Rad (G-250 Stain) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Mass spectrometry identification of proteins was carried out by R. Tomaino at Taplin Mass Spectometry Facility at Harvard Medical School (Boston, MA, USA).
Proximase ligation assay
Purified naive T cells were differentiated into TH9 cells for 24 h. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature and permeabilized with ice-cold MetOH for 10 min. After being blocked with a solution containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline for 30 min at room temperature, the cells were incubated with the primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. Then, PLA was performed with Duolink In situ reagents according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Images were acquired using Zeiss Axio Imager M2 microscope.
The antibodies were as follows: anti-APG5 (FL-275 Santa Cruz sc-33210, dilution 1:1,000) for WB, anti-LC3B (Sigma-Aldrich L7543, dilution 1:100) for WB and PLA, anti-p-Stat6 pY641 (BD Pharmingen 558241, dilution 1:1000) for WB, anti-Stat6 (Cell Signaling 9362, dilution 1:1000 for WB and 1:500 for PLA) for WB and PLA, anti-IRF4 (M-17 Santa Cruz sc-6059, dilution 1:1000 for WB and 1:500 for PLA) for WB and PLA, anti-GATA-3 (HG3-31 Santa Cruz sc-268, dilution 1:1000 for WB) for WB and anti-GATA-3 (H-48 Santa Cruz, dilution 1:500) for PLA, anti-PU.1 (T-21 Santa Cruz sc-352, 10 µg) for IP and (D-19 sc-5949, dilution 1:100) for PLA, anti-PU.1 (Cell Signaling 2266, dilution 1:100) for WB, anti-p62 (G962-C Progen, dilution 1:1000) for WB, mono- and polyubiquitinylated conjugates, mAb (FK2) HRP conjugate (Enzo BML-pw0150 dilution 1:1000) for WB, K48-linkage specific-polyubiquitin (D9D5 Cell Signaling 12805, dilution 1:1000) for PLA, K63-linkage specific-polyubiquitin (D7A11 Cell Signaling 12930, dilution 1:500) for PLA, anti-β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich, dilution 1:1000), Rabbit, Goat and Mouse IgG Isotype Control (Thermo Scientific, dilution 1:500 for PLA and 10 µg for IP) for IP and PLA, paxillin antibody B2 (Santa Cruz sc-365379, dilution 1:1000) and HDAC1 (Cell Signaling 2062, dilution 1:1000) for WB.
Chloroquine diphosphate (Sigma-Aldrich c6628) treatment: purified naive T cells were differentiated for 24 to 72 h into TH9 cells with chloroquine added at a final concentration of 25 μM (unless otherwise specified).
Metformin hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich PHR1084) treatment: purified naive T cells were differentiated for 24 to 72 h into TH9 cells with metformin added at a final concentration of 1 mM (unless otherwise specified).
DRB (Sigma-Aldrich D1916) treatment: purified naive T cells were differentiated for 16 h into TH9 cells and then 25 μg ml−1 of DRB was added for 8 h.
Cycloheximide (Sigma-Aldrich C 1988) treatment: purified naive T cells were differentiated into TH9 cells with cycloheximide added at a final concentration of 25 μg ml−1 during 0, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h.
MG132 (Sigma-Aldrich Z-Leu-Leu-Leu-al C2211) treatment: purified naive T cells were differentiated into TH9 cells with MG132 added at a final concentration of 2 mM during 24 h.
Real-time quantitative PCR
Total RNA from T cells was extracted with TriReagent (Ambion), reverse transcribed using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) and was analysed by RT-qPCR with the Sybr Green method according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the 7500 Fast Real Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Expression was normalized to the expression of mouse Actb. Primers designed to assess gene expression are as follows: Actb 5′-atggaggggaatacagccc-3′ and 5′-ttctttgcagctccttcgtt-3′; Ifng 5′-gagctcattgaatgcttggc-3′ and 5′-gcgtcattgaatcacacctg-3′; Il4 5′-cgagctcactctctgtggtg-3′ and 5′-tgaacgaggtcacaggagaa-3′; Il5 5′-catttccacagtacccccac-3′ and 5′-gcaatgagacgatgaggctt-3′; Il9 5′-aacagtccctccctgtagca-3′ and 5′-aaggatgatccaccgtcaaa-3′; Il10 5′-tgtcaaattcattcatggcct-3′ and 5′-atcgatttctcccctgtgaa-3′; Il13; Il17a 5′-tgagcttcccagatcacaga-3′ and 5′-tccagaaggccctcagacta-3′; Il21 5′-aaaacaggcaaaagctgcat-3′ and 5′-tgacattgttgaacagctgaaa-3′; Il1β 5′-ggtcaaaggtttggaagcag-3′ and 5′-tgtgaaatgccaccttttga-3′; Stat6 5′-tgcccggtctcacctaacta-3′ and 5′-ctggggtggtttcctcttg-3′; Irf4 5′-caaagcacagagtcacctgg-3′ and 5′-tgcaagctctttgacacaca-3′; Gata3 5′-aggatgtccctgctctcctt-3′ and 5′-gcctgcggactctaccataa-3′; Sfpi1 5′-tgcagctctgtgaagtggtt-3′ and 5′-agcgatggagaaagccatag-3′; Foxp3 5′-ctcgtctgaaggcagagtca-3′ and 5′-tggcagagaggtattgaggg-3′.
Statistical analysis was performed using Prism software (Graph Pad software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Student’s t-test and analysis of variance test were used for statistical analyses.
All relevant data are available from the authors.
Mizushima, N. & Komatsu, M. Autophagy: renovation of cells and tissues. Cell 147, 728–741 (2011).
Levine, B. & Kroemer, G. Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease. Cell 132, 27–42 (2008).
Levine, B., Mizushima, N. & Virgin, H. W. Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. Nature 469, 323–335 (2011).
Geng, J. & Klionsky, D. J. The Atg8 and Atg12 ubiquitin-like conjugation systems in macroautophagy. ‘Protein modifications: beyond the usual suspects’ review series. EMBO Rep. 9, 859–864 (2008).
Fujita, N. et al. The Atg16L complex specifies the site of LC3 lipidation for membrane biogenesis in autophagy. Mol. Biol. Cell. 19, 2092–2100 (2008).
Johansen, T. & Lamark, T. Selective autophagy mediated by autophagic adapter proteins. Autophagy 7, 279–296 (2011).
Lin, X. et al. Interaction domains of p62: a bridge between p62 and selective autophagy. DNA Cell Biol. 32, 220–227 (2013).
Galluzzi, L. et al. Autophagy in malignant transformation and cancer progression. EMBO J. 34, 856–880 (2015).
White, E. The role for autophagy in cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 125, 42–46 (2015).
Huijbers, A. et al. The effect of the ATG16L1 Thr300Ala polymorphism on susceptibility and outcome of patients with epithelial cell-derived thyroid carcinoma. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 19, L15–L18 (2012).
Grimm, W. A. et al. The Thr300Ala variant in ATG16L1 is associated with improved survival in human colorectal cancer and enhanced production of type I interferon. Gut 65, 456–464 (2016).
Pua, H. H., Dzhagalov, I., Chuck, M., Mizushima, N. & He, Y. W. A critical role for the autophagy gene Atg5 in T cell survival and proliferation. J. Exp. Med. 204, 25–31 (2007).
Kovacs, J. R. et al. Autophagy promotes T-cell survival through degradation of proteins of the cell death machinery. Cell Death Differ. 19, 144–152 (2012).
Jia, W. & He, Y. W. Temporal regulation of intracellular organelle homeostasis in T lymphocytes by autophagy. J. Immunol. 186, 5313–5322 (2011).
Puleston, D. J. et al. Autophagy is a critical regulator of memory CD8(+) T cell formation. eLife 3, e03706 (2014).
Wei, J. et al. Autophagy enforces functional integrity of regulatory T cells by coupling environmental cues and metabolic homeostasis. Nat. Immunol. 17, 277–285 (2016).
Li, C. et al. Autophagy is induced in CD4+ T cells and important for the growth factor-withdrawal cell death. J. Immunol. 177, 5163–5168 (2006).
Ichimura, Y. et al. A ubiquitin-like system mediates protein lipidation. Nature. 408, 488–492 (2000).
Mizushima, N. et al. A protein conjugation system essential for autophagy. Nature 395, 395–398 (1998).
Nishida, Y. et al. Discovery of Atg5/Atg7-independent alternative macroautophagy. Nature 461, 654–658 (2009).
Klionsky, D. J. et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition). Autophagy 12, 1–222 (2016).
Mizushima, N., Yoshimori, T. & Levine, B. Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell 140, 313–326 (2010).
Rubinsztein, D. C., Gestwicki, J. E., Murphy, L. O. & Klionsky, D. J. Potential therapeutic applications of autophagy. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 6, 304–312 (2007).
Paolicchi, E. et al. Targeting hypoxic response for cancer therapy. Oncotarget 7, 13464–13478 (2016).
Hur, K. Y. & Lee, M. S. New mechanisms of metformin action: focusing on mitochondria and the gut. J. Diabetes Investig. 6, 600–609 (2015).
Licona-Limon, P. et al. Th9 cells drive host immunity against gastrointestinal worm infection. Immunity 39, 744–757 (2013).
Hara, K. et al. Amino acid sufficiency and mTOR regulate p70 S6 kinase and eIF-4E BP1 through a common effector mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 14484–14494 (1998).
Dardalhon, V. et al. IL-4 inhibits TGF-beta-induced Foxp3+ T cells and, together with TGF-beta, generates IL-9+IL-10+Foxp3(−) effector T cells. Nat. Immunol. 9, 1347–1355 (2008).
Katsuragi, Y., Ichimura, Y. & Komatsu, M. p62/SQSTM1 functions as a signaling hub and an autophagy adaptor. FEBS J. 282, 4672–4678 (2015).
Moscat, J. & Diaz-Meco, M. T. p62 at the crossroads of autophagy, apoptosis, and cancer. Cell 137, 1001–1004 (2009).
Hallier, M., Tavitian, A. & Moreau-Gachelin, F. The transcription factor Spi-1/PU.1 binds RNA and interferes with the RNA-binding protein p54nrb. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11177–11181 (1996).
Paul, S. & Schaefer, B. C. Selective autophagy regulates T cell activation. Autophagy 8, 1690–1692 (2012).
Vegran, F. et al. The transcription factor IRF1 dictates the IL-21-dependent anticancer functions of TH9 cells. Nat. Immunol. 15, 758–766 (2014).
Purwar, R. et al. Robust tumor immunity to melanoma mediated by interleukin-9-producing T cells. Nat. Med. 18, 1248–1253 (2012).
Muranski, P. et al. Tumor-specific Th17-polarized cells eradicate large established melanoma. Blood 112, 362–373 (2008).
Lu, Y. et al. Th9 cells promote antitumor immune responses in vivo. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 4160–4171 (2012).
Veldhoen, M. et al. Transforming growth factor-beta ‘reprograms’ the differentiation of T helper 2 cells and promotes an interleukin 9-producing subset. Nat. Immunol. 9, 1341–1346 (2008).
Nakatsukasa, H. et al. The DNA-binding inhibitor Id3 regulates IL-9 production in CD4(+) T cells. Nat. Immunol. 16, 1077–1084 (2015).
Kim, I. K. et al. Glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-related protein co-stimulation facilitates tumor regression by inducing IL-9-producing helper T cells. Nat. Med. 21, 1010–1017 (2015).
Chang, H. C. et al. The transcription factor PU.1 is required for the development of IL-9-producing T cells and allergic inflammation. Nat. Immunol. 11, 527–534 (2010).
Nishiyama, C. et al. Functional analysis of PU.1 domains in monocyte-specific gene regulation. FEBS Lett. 561, 63–68 (2004).
Konishi, Y. & Tominaga, A. PU.1 is degraded in differentiation of erythrocytes through a proteasome-dependent pathway. DNA Cell Biol. 25, 340–345 (2006).
Kabat, A. M. et al. The autophagy gene Atg16l1 differentially regulates Treg and TH2 cells to control intestinal inflammation. eLife 5, e12444 (2016).
Michalek, R. D. et al. Cutting edge: distinct glycolytic and lipid oxidative metabolic programs are essential for effector and regulatory CD4+ T cell subsets. J. Immunol. 186, 3299–3303 (2011).
Wan, Y. Y. GATA3: a master of many trades in immune regulation. Trends Immunol. 35, 233–242 (2014).
Abdel Fattah, E., Bhattacharya, A., Herron, A., Safdar, Z. & Eissa, N. T. Critical role for IL-18 in spontaneous lung inflammation caused by autophagy deficiency. J. Immunol. 194, 5407–5416 (2015).
Zhao, J. et al. Celastrol ameliorates experimental colitis in IL-10 deficient mice via the up-regulation of autophagy. Int. Immunopharmacol. 26, 221–228 (2015).
Hubbard-Lucey, V. M. et al. Autophagy gene Atg16L1 prevents lethal T cell alloreactivity mediated by dendritic cells. Immunity 41, 579–591 (2014).
Ravindran, R. et al. The amino acid sensor GCN2 controls gut inflammation by inhibiting inflammasome activation. Nature 531, 523–527 (2016).
Liu, J. Z. et al. Association analyses identify 38 susceptibility loci for inflammatory bowel disease and highlight shared genetic risk across populations. Nat. Genet. 47, 979–986 (2015).
Gerlach, K. et al. TH9 cells that express the transcription factor PU.1 drive T cell-mediated colitis via IL-9 receptor signaling in intestinal epithelial cells. Nat. Immunol. 15, 676–686 (2014).
Nalleweg, N. et al. IL-9 and its receptor are predominantly involved in the pathogenesis of UC. Gut 64, 743–755 (2015).
Gerlach, K., McKenzie, A. N., Neurath, M. F. & Weigmann, B. IL-9 regulates intestinal barrier function in experimental T cell-mediated colitis. Tissue Barriers 3, e983777 (2015).
The authors are supported by grants from the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (to F.G.), the Fondation de France (to L.A. and T.R.V.), the Institut National du Cancer (to F.G.), the Fondation ARC pour la recherche sur le cancer (to L.A.), the Institut Mérieux (to L.A.), the Conseil Régional de Bourgogne (to F.G. and L.A.), the FEDER, the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-13-JSV3-0001) (to L.A.) and (ANR-11-LABX-0021), the ARSEP (to L.A. and M.D.), the Ligue Régionale contre le cancer Comité Grand-Est (to L.A.) and the European Commission (Marie Curie Fellowship PCIG10-GA-2011-303719) and ERC starting grant (677251) (to L.A.).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Rivera Vargas, T., Cai, Z., Shen, Y. et al. Selective degradation of PU.1 during autophagy represses the differentiation and antitumour activity of TH9 cells. Nat Commun 8, 559 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00468-w
Frontiers in Immunology (2020)
Cancer Letters (2020)
Selective Autophagy Maintains the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Levels in HeLa Cells: A Mechanism That Is Dependent on the p23 Co-Chaperone
International Journal of Molecular Sciences (2020)
Mogroside IIE Inhibits Digestive Enzymes via Suppression of Interleukin 9/Interleukin 9 Receptor Signalling in Acute Pancreatitis
Frontiers in Pharmacology (2020)