Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Alkaline earth metal vanadates as sodium-ion battery anodes


The abundance of sodium resources indicates the potential of sodium-ion batteries as emerging energy storage devices. However, the practical application of sodium-ion batteries is hindered by the limited electrochemical performance of electrode materials, especially at the anode side. Here, we identify alkaline earth metal vanadates as promising anodes for sodium-ion batteries. The prepared calcium vanadate nanowires possess intrinsically high electronic conductivity (> 100 S cm−1), small volume change (< 10%), and a self-preserving effect, which results in a superior cycling and rate performance and an applicable reversible capacity (> 300 mAh g−1), with an average voltage of 1.0 V. The specific sodium-storage mechanism, beyond the conventional intercalation or conversion reaction, is demonstrated through in situ and ex situ characterizations and theoretical calculations. This work explores alkaline earth metal vanadates for sodium-ion battery anodes and may open a direction for energy storage.


The development of renewable energy, such as solar, wind, and tidal energy, is fundamentally important for our society due to the increasing scarcity of fossil fuels1. Large-scale energy storage systems are necessary to meet the challenge of discontinuity of the renewable energy flow2, 3. Recently, sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) have been considered as a promising battery technology and have attracted great attention4. SIBs have a similar configuration and electrochemical reaction processes with lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). But sodium resources are much more abundant and cost-effective than lithium resources, which makes SIBs more suitable for large-scale energy storage applications5,6,7. However, the performance of SIBs cannot currently meet the demands. The problem may be due to the larger ionic size of Na+ or generally weak binding of Na with substrate, which results in sluggish reaction kinetics or severe degradation of the electrodes8,9,10. One of the most important tasks to realize the practical application of SIBs is to find suitable electrode materials with long-term cycling stability, high rate capability, low cost and high capacity.

Due to the unremitting efforts of scientists around the world, cathode research has made great progress11,12,13,14,15,16,17. However, the development of anodes faces a significant challenge18. Carbon-based materials (such as hard carbon, Fig. 1a) are limited by a poor rate capability and safety issues19,20,21. Titanium-based anodes (such as NaTi2(PO4)3 and Na2Ti3O7, Fig. 1a) store Na ions through an intercalation/de-intercalation mechanism, leading to low capacity due to limited intercalation sites22,23,24,25,26,27. Other anode materials based on conversion or alloying reactions (such as SnO2, Sb and P, Fig. 1a) can deliver high initial capacity28,29,30,31,32,33,34, but the inevitable large volume variation (Fig. 1b) during the discharge/charge process leads to the pulverization of the electrodes and subsequent severe capacity fading35, 36. Carbon modification and complex structure design can improve the electrochemical performance, but inevitably increase the cost and are not beneficial to practical applications. In this case, new anode materials with intrinsically good electrochemical properties are desired for the development of SIBs.

Fig. 1

Comparison of the CaV4O9 nanowires in this work and previously reported SIB anodes. a Average voltage vs. reversible capacity of the anodes for SIBs. b Volume change of the reported alloying or conversion reaction anodes for SIBs

Vanadium-based materials, including vanadium oxides37,38,39,40,41,42, alkaline metal vanadates43, and transition metal vanadates44,45,46, have been widely studied as electrodes of rechargeable batteries for more than 30 years47,48,49. However, the investigation of vanadium-based materials has been ignored in the context of SIB anodes. Vanadium can achieve multi-electron transfer below 1.0 V due to its multivalent properties41, indicating that it may deliver higher capacity than Ti-based anodes. Additionally, the valence state of vanadium is not able to reach zero to form metallic V during the discharge/charge process due to the strong V–O bond strength42, suggesting that the volume variation of vanadium-based electrodes at low voltage may be smaller than that of typical conversion-based electrodes (such as SnO2 and Fe2O3). Moreover, previous studies showed that alkaline-earth-metal-containing compounds, especially Ca-containing compounds, such as Ca–Co–O50, Ca–Sn–O51, and Ca–Fe–O52, exhibit interesting electrochemical performance when used as LIB anodes. Ca ions are electrochemically inactive, but can form nano-sized CaO and cause a “spectator effect” to buffer the volume change of the electrodes and to restrain the agglomeration of active nanograins52. Because of the “spectator effect” of nano-sized alkaline earth oxides (such as CaO) and the unique properties of vanadium (multivalent and strong V–O bond strength), alkaline earth metal vanadates are expected to exhibit both high capacity and long-term cycling stability as SIB anodes. And the unique advantages of nanowires in energy storage53 and in situ characterization54 are our motivation to fabricate nanowires.

Herein, we demonstrate the outstanding electrochemical properties of alkaline earth metal vanadates (Ca–V–O and Sr–V–O) as SIB anodes. Based on a single nanowire device, CaV4O9 shows good electronic conductivity. Through in situ/ex situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements together with ab initio calculations, a specific Na+ storage mechanism, beyond the conventional intercalation or conversion reaction, is demonstrated. Ascribe to that, the electrodes can achieve four-electron transfer per formula with negligible volume variation during the sodiation/desodiation process; this process is accompanied by the self-preserving effect from in situ formed CaO nanograins. These positive properties of CaV4O9 result in its applicable capacity, good rate capability, and long-term cycling stability, manifesting great potential in SIBs.


Characterization of CaV4O9 nanowires

CaV4O9 nanowires, with a diameter of ~100 nm and a length of ~10 μm (Supplementary Fig. 1), were synthesized using a facile hydrothermal method followed by heat treatment. Both low-crystalline and high-crystalline CaV4O9 nanowires were obtained by controlling the sintering temperature (Fig. 2a). The XRD results show that the sample prepared at 450 °C (marked as CVO-450) displays much weaker diffraction peaks than the sample prepared at 550 °C (marked as CVO-550), indicating the low crystallinity of CVO-450 (Fig. 2a). The diffraction peaks of both CVO-450 and CVO-550 can be indexed to the pure phase of tetragonal CaV4O9 (JCPDS: 01-070-4469), which is a layered structure, and the Ca ions are evenly distributed in the crystal structure (Fig. 2b, c). Inductively coupled plasma (ICP) measurements indicate Ca/V molar ratios of 0.97/4 and 1.08/4 for CVO-450 and CVO-550, respectively. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectra (EDS) mappings demonstrate that Ca, V, and O uniformly exist in both samples (Fig. 2d, e). For comparison, we also prepared V–O nanowires (Supplementary Fig. 2) using a similar process without adding Ca. The nanowires were characterized as the monoclinic VO2 phase (JCPDS: 01-076-0456) (marked as VO2-450).

Fig. 2

Characterization of CVO-450 and CVO-550 nanowires. a XRD patterns of CVO-450 and CVO-550. b, c Crystal structures of the CaV4O9; the green and red balls represent Ca and O ions, respectively, and the grey polyhedrals represent the V–O pyramids. d, e EDS mapping of CVO-450 and CVO-550, respectively. The scale bar is 6 µm for d and 3 µm for e. fh TEM and HRTEM images of CVO-450; the inset of h is the SAED pattern of CVO-450. The scale bars of fh and the inset of h are 200 nm, 50 nm, 5 nm, and 2 nm–1, respectively. ik TEM and HRTEM images of CVO-550; the inset of k is the SAED pattern of CVO-550. The scale bars of ik and the inset of k are 500 nm, 100 nm, 5 nm, and 2 nm–1, respectively

TEM and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images of CVO-450 are shown in Fig. 2f–h; large amounts of cavities are distributed on the nanowires (Fig. 2g and Supplementary Fig. 3). However, no obvious cavities were observed for CVO-550 (Fig. 2i, j), and the morphology is not as regular as that of CVO-450 because of the higher annealing temperature. The HRTEM image of CVO-450 shows distinct amorphous regions with lattice fringes (Fig. 2h), indicating the low crystallinity. However, the highly crystalline CVO-550 shows a defined lattice fringe with interplanar spacing of 0.38 nm, corresponding to the (111) lattice plane, and the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern reveals the single-crystal characteristic of the CVO-550 nanowires (Fig. 2k).

Thermogravimetry/derivative thermogravimetry (TG/DTG), Fourier-transformed infrared (FT-IR), and XRD measurements were performed to explore the formation mechanism of the low-crystalline structure with large amounts of cavities of the CVO-450 nanowires (Supplementary Figs. 4, 5). These results demonstrated that the evaporation of crystal water leads to the formation of the low-crystalline structure and the cavities on the CVO-450 nanowires (Supplementary Fig. 6, Supplementary Note 1). While for CVO-550, the higher annealing temperature leads to the higher crystallinity and the closure of the cavities together with the irregular morphology. Details can be found in Supplementary Information.

Electrochemical properties of CaV4O9 nanowires

We explored and compared the electrochemical performance of the two calcium vanadate nanowire samples (CVO-450 and CVO-550) as SIB anodes to evaluate the potential of CaV4O9 as an electrode material. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) results were measured at 0.1 mV s−1 in the voltage range of 3.0–0.01 V (vs. Na+/Na). CVO-450 shows no obvious redox peaks, but CVO-550 displays an irreversible cathodic peak at ~1.1 V in the initial scan (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b), which may correspond to the irreversible structural dissociation in the initial sodiation process. The capacity loss below 0.5 V for both CVO-450 and CVO-550 in the initial scan can be attributed to the formation of a solid electrolyte interphase and unmanageable side reaction at low voltage55, 56. The discharge/charge profiles (Fig. 3a) at a current density of 100 mA g−1 (voltage range from 3.0 to 0.01 V vs. Na+/Na) show that CVO-450 exhibits a reversible capacity of ~350 mAh g−1 with an initial Coulombic efficiency of 70.5%. There is no distinct voltage plateau in the charge/discharge curves, with an average voltage of ~1.0 V, in agreement with the CV results. The voltage hysteresis between discharge and charge, which may be attributed to the different reaction paths during sodiation and desodiation57, shows a minor change from the 2nd cycle to the 100th cycle, indicating a good electrochemical stability. The capacity retention is 102.8% relative to the second discharge capacity after 100 cycles (Supplementary Fig. 7e), demonstrating a good cycling stability. CVO-550 exhibits a distinct capacity increase in the initial 20 cycles with lower initial Coulombic efficiency (Supplementary Fig. 7f), and the corresponding discharge/charge curves display reduced polarization, indicating activation and amorphization. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) results (Supplementary Fig. 8) show that the charge transfer resistance (R ct) of CVO-450 after the first cycle is much smaller than that of CVO-550. After different cycles, the R ct value for CVO-450 shows only minor changes, which is consistent with its stable cycling performance. While for CVO-550, R ct decreases significantly after 100 cycles, confirming the activation process during cycling.

Fig. 3

Electrochemical properties of CaV4O9 nanowires and VO2 nanowires as SIB anodes. a Discharge/charge profiles of CVO-450 after different numbers of cycles at 100 mA g−1. b I–V curves of CVO-450 and VO2-450 nanowires. Inset is the SEM image of the CVO-450 single nanowire device. Scale bar, 10 µm. c Rate performances of CVO-450, CVO-550, and VO2-450 at different current densities of 100, 300, 500, 1000, 2000 and 5000 mA g−1. d Cycling performances and Coulombic efficiency of CVO-450, CVO-550, and VO2-450 at a current density of 1000 mA g−1

To investigate the superiority of CaV4O9 compared to pristine vanadium oxide with regard to their electrochemical properties, we compared the electric conductivity of CVO-450 and VO2-450 based on the IV curves by assembling single nanowire devices (Fig. 3b). The conductivity was 110–265 S cm−1 for CVO-450, 15 times higher than that of VO2-450 (7–14 S cm−1). Note that the conductivity of the low-crystallinity CaV4O9 nanowire exceeds 100 S cm−1 and is higher than that of VO2 nanowires. The improved conductivity may be attributed to the increased carrier density introduced by Ca ions in the structure58.

The rate capabilities of CVO-450, CVO-550, and VO2-450 were tested to compare their electrochemical performance (Fig. 3c). All three electrodes go through three stages at different current densities. CVO-450 has an average capacity of 363.9 mAh g−1 at 100 mA g−1 in stage I. When the current rate increased to 5000 mA g−1 (25 C), the average capacity still reached 205.0 mAh g−1 (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 9), which is 56.3% of that at 100 mA g−1, despite the 50-fold increase in the current density, indicating outstanding rate capability. Notably, when the current density returned to 100 mA g−1 and then increased to 5000 mA g−1 in stage II, no capacity decay was observed but there was a slight capacity increase compared to the corresponding rate in stage I (Supplementary Table 1). In stage III, CVO-450 still displays a slight increasing trend in capacity at 1000 mA g−1. CVO-550 displays lower capacity and inferior high rate capability compared with CVO-450. However, its increasing trend is more distinct among the three stages. The average capacity at 100 mA g−1 increased to 331.5 mAh g−1 in stage II compared to stage I (265.2 mAh g−1) (Fig. 3c, Supplementary Table 1). However, for VO2-450, capacity fading is observed at high current density in stage II compared with that in stage I. And in stage III, the capacity fading is also distinct compared with the two CaV4O9 nanowire samples. These results indicate that CaV4O9 nanowires display better rate capability and electrochemical stability than VO2 nanowires.

To further confirm the improved electrochemical stability of CaV4O9 nanowires over VO2 nanowires, CVO-450, CVO-550, and VO2-450 were tested at 1000 mA g−1 for long-term cycling (Fig. 3d). CVO-450 exhibits a discharge capacity of 203.2 mAh g−1 at the second cycle and a gradual increase in the following ~300 cycles. After 1000 cycles, the discharge capacity remains at 161.5 mAh g−1, corresponding to a retention of 79.4% relative to the second discharge. For CVO-550, the electrode was activated at 50 mA g−1 for 10 cycles and then cycled at 1000 mA g−1. The 12th discharge capacity is 146.2 mAh g−1, and after 1600 cycles, the capacity remains at 149.8 mAh g−1, corresponding to a capacity retention of 102.4% and demonstrating excellent cycling stability. Note that the CVO-550 shows better cycling stability than CVO-450. For VO2-450, the second discharge capacity is 166.9 mAh g−1, and its capacity also increases at first and then decreases. After 600 cycles, the capacity decreases to 90.3 mA g−1, with a capacity retention of 54.1% (Fig. 3d). The long-term cycling performance also demonstrates that CaV4O9 nanowires possess better cycling stability than VO2 nanowires.

Na-ion full batteries with CVO-450 as the anode and excessive Na3V2(PO4)3/C nanoparticles (Supplementary Fig. 10) as the cathode were assembled, to demonstrate the potential of the as-synthesized calcium vanadate nanowires for practical applications. Na3V2(PO4)3 was selected as the counterpart due to its stable voltage plateau and excellent structural stability when used as a SIB cathode. The full cell, cycled in the voltage range of 0.5–3.2 V, exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 165.6 mAh g−1 at 1000 mA g−1 based on the mass of CVO-450. The charge/discharge profiles display sloping curves, with an average output voltage of ~1.8 V (Supplementary Fig. 11b). This feature of the sloping charge/discharge curve is beneficial for monitoring the charge/discharge state of the batteries, which is significant for practical applications. After 400 cycles, the discharge capacity is maintained at 170.1 mAh g−1 (Supplementary Fig. 11c), indicating good cycling stability. Full batteries with higher output voltage and smaller voltage hysteresis can be produced by using cathodes with higher voltages and optimizing the transport properties of both electrodes.

Sodium-storage mechanism

As mentioned above, except the initial discharge process, both CVO-450 and CVO-550 display sloping discharge/charge profiles without voltage plateaus. To clarify the Na+ storage mechanism, CV measurements for CVO-450 (Fig. 4a) and CVO-550 (Supplementary Fig. 12a) were performed at different scan rates. The sodiation currents (at 0.01 V) display a linear relation with the square root of the scan rate (v 1/2) for both samples (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 12b), which indicates a diffusion-controlled charge storage mechanism for CVO-450 and CVO-550 but not a capacitive process59, 60. To obtain deeper insight, in situ XRD measurement was performed on CVO-450 (Fig. 4c). In the initial sodiation process, no shift was observed for the (121) peak at about 29.8°, but the peak intensity weakened as the discharge proceeded, indicating the consumption of pristine CaV4O9 and the amorphization of the structure. At the end of the discharge, the (121) peak completely disappeared and did not return during the charge process. Ex situ XRD tests were also performed on CVO-550. None of the peaks shifted, but they only weakened (Supplementary Fig. 13), displaying the same trends as the in situ XRD characterization. These results suggest that Na ions are stored by reacting with CaV4O9 directly, and this process leads to amorphization of the pristine structure without bulk phase transformation, which accounts for the sloping discharge/charge curves. Moreover, the amorphous or less-crystalline structure provides more active sites and better ion diffusion kinetics42, 46, which explains the significant increase in capacity for CVO-550 in the initial cycles. And due to the low crystallinity of CVO-450 in the pristine state, it displays a better rate capability than CVO-550.

Fig. 4

Cyclic voltammetry and in situ XRD results of CVO-450. a CV curves of CVO-450 at scan rates from 0.5 to 50 mV s−1. b The relation between the square root of the scan rate (v 1/2) and the corresponding currents at 0.01 V. c In situ XRD results of CVO-450 during the initial discharge and charge process

The valence variation during the Na+ insertion/extraction was investigated by ex situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurement on CVO-450 (Supplementary Fig. 14). The peak at the binding energy of 347.5 eV for the electrode before cycling is attributed to the Ca2+ 2p3/2, and the peak of V 2p3/2 (516.5 eV) corresponds to V4+. No distinct chemical shift of the binding energy for the Ca2+ 2p3/2 was observed for the electrode after initial discharge to 0.01 V, revealing the inactivity of Ca2+. For the V 2p3/2 spectrum, the peak can be fitted to two portions. The new peak at 515.4 eV indicates the formation of V3+, whereas the binding energy at 516.8 eV indicates the coexistence of V4+ in the discharge state, suggesting the incomplete reaction of CaV4O9 in the initial discharge. The valance of V is mainly recovered to +4 after charging to 3.0 V, while the Ca is unchanged.

Ex situ TEM measurements were performed on CVO-450 to study the structural change during Na+ insertion/extraction. The nanowire morphology remains integrated at the sodiation state after five cycles (Fig. 5a). The SAED patterns collected from region 1 and region 2 are presented in Fig. 5b, c, respectively. The diffraction spots in the green circle (Fig. 5b) can be indexed to the (111) plane of CaV4O9 (Supplementary Table 2), which indicates the existence of unreacted CaV4O9. The diffraction spots in the yellow circle correspond to lattice planes with a spacing of 0.21 nm. The XPS results indicate that Na+ insertion leads to the formation of V3+. Combined with the XPS and SAED results, the diffraction spots with a spacing of 0.21 nm can be regarded as the (104) lattice plane of NaVO2 (JCPDS: 00-027-0825, Supplementary Table 3). The formation of NaVO2 indicates the decomposition of pristine CaV4O9, and CaO nanograins will be formed. The rest of the diffraction spots in the red circles correspond to spacings of 0.145 and 0.13 nm, confirming the generation of CaO (JCPDS: 00-001-1160, Supplementary Table 4). In the diffraction pattern of region 2 (Fig. 5c), more obvious diffraction spots from CaV4O9 and diffraction ring from NaVO2 were detected, further confirming the coexistence of CaV4O9 and NaVO2 at the sodiation state. The HRTEM image (Fig. 5d) shows nanograins with size of ~5 nm, and lattice fringes with spacings of 0.19 and 0.21 nm, which correspond to the (240) plane of CaV4O9 and the (104) plane of NaVO2, respectively. The HRTEM image is consistent with the SAED patterns and demonstrates that Na+ insertion in the initial cycles leads to partial conversion from CaV4O9 to NaVO2 and CaO nanograins.

Fig. 5

Ex situ TEM characterization of CVO-450 at the discharge and charge states. ad TEM image, SAED patterns, and HRTEM image of CVO-450 at the sodiation state after 5 cycles at 1000 mA g−1. The SAED patterns of b and c were collected from region 1 and region 2 in a, respectively. eh TEM image, SAED patterns, and HRTEM image of CVO-450 at the sodiation state after 300 cycles at 1000 mA g−1. The SAED patterns of f and g were collected from region 3 and region 4 in e, respectively. il TEM image, SAED patterns and HRTEM image of CVO-450 at the desodiation state after 300 cycles at 1000 mA g−1. SAED patterns of j and k were collected from region 5 and region 6 in i, respectively. Scale bars: a 200 nm; e, i 500 nm; b, c, f, g, j, k 5 nm−1; d, h, l 5 nm

For CVO-450 at the sodiation state, even after 300 cycles, the nanowire retains its integrity (Fig. 5e). Both the SAED patterns collected from regions 3 and 4 display a distinct diffusion ring (Fig. 5f, g), indicating the formation of amorphous phase in the nanowires. Moreover, the typical diffraction rings of NaVO2 and CaO were also detected (Fig. 5f, g). But no diffraction spots or rings of CaV4O9 were found, revealing the complete reaction of the original CaV4O9. These results indicate that the unreacted CaV4O9 gradually participates in the reaction, as demonstrated by the observed capacity increase of CVO-450 in the first ~300 cycles (Fig. 3d). The HRTEM image shows the (104) plane of NaVO2 with different orientations (Fig. 5h), consistent with the SAED patterns. Note that no obvious lattice fringes of CaO were observed in the HRTEM images, suggesting the small size of the CaO nanograins in the matrix.

For the desodiation state of the CVO-450 after 300 cycles, SAED patterns were also collected from two regions of the nanowires (Fig. 5i). The diffraction rings of the (311) plane (Fig. 5j, k) and (400) plane (Fig. 5k) of CaO were also detected, further confirming the “spectator effect” of the Na-driven CaO. Moreover, in Fig. 5j, a much thicker diffraction ring in the blue circles was observed, which suggests the overlap of two or three rings. In addition, the inner and outer rings correspond to plane spacings of 0.21 and 0.20 nm, respectively, which is consistent with the (210) and (021) planes of monoclinic VO2 (JCPDS: 00-009-0142, Supplementary Table 5). A weak diffraction ring with a spacing of 0.185 nm was also detected, consistent with the (−302) plane of VO2 (Supplementary Table 5). The diffraction rings with plane spacings of 0.24 and 0.20 nm in Fig. 5k further confirm the formation of VO2 at the desodiation state. The HRTEM image shows obvious lattice fringes with a spacing of 0.20 nm, corresponding to the (021) plane of VO2, consistent with the SAED patterns. The SAED and HRTEM results indicate the conversion of NaVO2 nanograins to VO2 nanograins in the Na+ extraction process. Thus, the total reaction can be summarized as follows:

The initial discharge process:

$${\rm{Ca}}{{\rm{V}}_4}{{\rm{O}}_9} + 4{\rm{N}}{{\rm{a}}^ + } + 4{{\rm{e}}^ - } \to 4{\rm{NaV}}{{\rm{O}}_2} + {\rm{CaO}}$$

The subsequent cycles:

$${\rm{NaV}}{{\rm{O}}_2} \leftrightarrow {\rm{V}}{{\rm{O}}_2} + {\rm{N}}{{\rm{a}}^ + } + {{\rm{e}}^ - }$$

There is no metallic V or Na2O generated both in the initial discharge process and the subsequent cycles, which is different from the typical conversion reaction observed in other transition metal oxides.

The ex situ TEM measurement was also performed on VO2 nanowires at the sodiation state after 300 cycles. The nanowire morphology also keeps integrated according to the TEM image (Supplementary Fig. 15a). The SAED pattern and the HRTEM image manifest the formation of NaVO2 (JCPDS: 00-044-0342) at the sodiation state (Supplementary Fig. 15b, c). However, different from that observed at the sodiation state of CaV4O9, the SAED pattern displays strong diffraction spots rather than diffraction rings (Supplementary Fig. 15b), indicating that the generated NaVO2 display a large grain size. From the HRTEM image, the distinct nanograins were observed with grain size of ~20 nm (Supplementary Fig. 15c), much larger than those derived from CaV4O9.

To confirm the proposed reaction mechanism of CaV4O9, we performed ab initio calculations based on the density-functional theory (DFT). The difference of total energies between the resultants and reactants in Eq. (1) reaches −6.13 eV, indicating that the resultants are much more stable than the reactants. Therefore the conversion from CaV4O9 to NaVO2 is spontaneous after the Na+ insertion and not reversible. Next, considering the small size of generated NaVO2 and VO2 nanograins (~5 nm, observed in TEM characterization), we used three models of (001), (010), and (110) surfaces (Supplementary Fig. 16a–c) to study the surface effect of NaVO2 nanograins on the Na dissociation. The calculated dissociation energies of Na from the (001), (010), and (110) surfaces were −0.23, 0.50, and 0.41 eV, respectively. These small values indicate that the Na dissociation from all the three surfaces is feasible and highly reversible, suggesting a reversible conversion between NaVO2 and VO2 nanograins as Eq. (2) in charge/discharge processes. Moreover, a model of NaVO2 crystal (Supplementary Fig. 16d) was also applied to calculate the dissociation energy of Na. In this case, the average energy reached a large value of 5.63 eV, indicating the conversion from NaVO2 crystal to VO2 is hard to be realized. Thus, the reaction of Eq. (2) is influenced by the particle size, and the small generated nanograins (~5 nm) derived from CaV4O9 are beneficial to the conversion between NaVO2 and VO2. Besides, these results highlight the importance of the generated CaO, which prevent the NaVO2 nanograins from agglomerating and preserve the small size of the active components, and then keep the electrodes with high reversibility.


Based on Eqs. (1) and (2), the theoretical specific capacity and volume change of CaV4O9 can be calculated. Assuming that CaV4O9 is fully reacted in the initial sodiation process, as shown in Eq. (1), four electrons are transferred when V4+ is converted to V3+, and the corresponding capacity is 276.4 mAh g–1. Note that the average capacity of CVO-550 at 100 mA g−1 reaches 331.5 mAh g–1 during stage II (Fig. 3c), which is higher than the calculated value. This is because Na+ insertion also leads to the formation of an amorphous phase (as evidenced by the ex situ TEM results) in addition to NaVO2 and CaO nanograins, and the amorphous region provides additional active sites (such as vacant sites or void spaces) for Na ions42, 61, resulting in the higher capacity. The capacity of CVO-450 is higher than that of CVO-550 at different current densities. The extra capacity can be attributed to the residual water in the nanowires. As described before, the nanowire samples contain considerable crystal water (~6.2%) before annealing (Supplementary Figs. 46). As indicated by the XRD and FT-IR results (Supplementary Fig. 5a, c), the crystal water was still not fully removed for CVO-400 (annealed at 400 °C); thus, it is reasonable that there is minor residual water in CVO-450. As reported by Grey’s group56, residual water or OH groups can act as a major source of additional capacity. However, residual water also leads to the consumption and decomposition of the electrolyte and does not benefit the long-term cycle life of the batteries, which explains why CVO-450 has inferior cycling stability compared to CVO-550 (Fig. 3d). To further confirm this point, CVO-400 was also tested as electrode and compared with CVO-450 and CVO-550. As expected, the CVO-400 exhibits higher initial capacity but much poorer cycling stability (Supplementary Fig. 17).

For the volume change, we also assumed the complete reaction of CaV4O9 in the initial cycle. Based on Eq. (1), one mole of CaV4O9 is converted to four moles of NaVO2 and one mole of CaO. The cell volumes of CaV4O9, NaVO2, and CaO are 347.6 Å3 (Z = 2), 126.7 Å3 (Z = 4), and 110.4 Å3 (Z = 4) (Z represents the number of molecules in each unit cell), respectively. The volume change of CaV4O9 in the sodiation process is calculated as follows:

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\rm{Volume}}\,{\rm{change}} = \frac{{4 \times \frac{1}{4} \times 126.7 + \frac{1}{4} \times 110.4 - \frac{1}{2} \times 347.6}}{{\frac{1}{2} \times 347.6}} = - 11.2\% \hfill \end{array}$$

For the desodiation process, one mole of NaVO2 is converted to one mole of VO2, as shown in Eq. (2). The cell volume of VO2 is 117.5 Å3 (Z = 4); thus, the volume change is –7.3%. Notably, the theoretical calculation indicates tiny volume shrinkage in the initial sodiation/desodiation process. However, because of the stepwise reaction of CaV4O9 in the initial cycles and the fact that the amorphous phase (which was not taken into account during the calculation) is also formed during the discharge/charge process, the shrinkage is effectively offset. Thus, the volume change in the entire discharge/charge process is very small (<10% based on a conservative estimation), which explains why the nanowire morphology is retained in both the discharge and charge states, even after 300 cycles. The small volume change during the sodiation/desodiation process essentially benefits the electrochemical stability27.

In situ TEM was performed to confirm the small volume change of the CaV4O9 nanowires during the sodiation process. The in situ electrochemical device was assembled with CVO-450 nanowire as the working electrode and bulk metallic Na as the counter electrode. The naturally formed Na2O layer on the surface of metallic Na acted as the solid electrolyte62 (Fig. 6a). The sodiation process was driven by an external constant voltage. The reaction front was clearly observed after the voltage was applied and diffused towards the other side of the nanowire (Fig. 6b). Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) data (Fig. 6c) were collected from the red circle areas at 0 and 35 min, respectively, and confirmed the diffusion of Na+ into the nanowire. Remarkably, during the entire sodiation process, the nanowire retains its integrity and remains steady, and there is no obvious expansion, elongation or bending, revealing the small volume change and good structural stability of CaV4O9 nanowires during the Na+ insertion. The in situ TEM measurement further confirms the reliability of our analyses.

Fig. 6

In situ TEM results of CVO-450. a Configuration of the in situ TEM device. Scale bar, 500 nm. b Time-lapse TEM images after applying a voltage bias. Scale bar, 500 nm. c EELS data collected from the red circle area at 0 and 35 min

Based on our comprehensive analyses, the reaction mechanism of the CaV4O9 was proposed, as shown in Fig. 7a. The Na+ insertion into CaV4O9 crystal results in the irreversible structural dissociation and amorphization, meanwhile, NaVO2 and CaO nanograins are generated and dispersed uniformly in the amorphous matrix. In the desodiation process, the NaVO2 nanograins are converted to VO2 nanograins, and CaO act as a spectator. The superior electrochemical performance of CaV4O9 can be attributed to the following aspects: First, both the pristine CaV4O9 and the generated VO2 have good electric conductivity, which ensures good conductance of the nanowires throughout the whole discharge/charge process. Second, the structural dissociation and amorphization process leads to increase of the active surface area, which is beneficial to the ion diffusion kinetics. The good conductance and the increased active surface area contribute to the good rate capability. Besides, the in situ generated and uniformly distributed CaO nanograins produce a self-preserving effect in the whole subsequent cycles, which effectively inhibit the agglomeration of the active components, and then preserve the high reversibility of the conversion between NaVO2 and VO2 nanograins in the desodiation/sodiation process. Finally, the entire sodiation/desodiation process produces a small volume change of <10%, which further ensures the good cycling stability. In the case of VO2 crystal (Fig. 7b), due to the absence of the self-preserving effect from CaO, the generated NaVO2 nanograins tend to agglomerate into relatively large sized particles as the cycling continues, which results in the poor reversibility of the subsequent desodiation/sodiation processes, and then the observed capacity fading.

Fig. 7

Illustration of the reaction mechanism during initial sodiation and subsequent cycles. a Sodium-storage mechanism of CaV4O9. b Sodium-storage mechanism of VO2

To reflect the generality of alkaline earth metal vanadates as high-performance SIB anodes, we fabricated Sr–V–O nanowires (Supplementary Fig. 18) through a similar synthesis method. The XRD results of samples annealed at different conditions are shown in Supplementary Fig. 18a. The TG curve shows a weight loss of 5.2% between 200 and 450 °C, corresponding to the evaporation of crystal water (Supplementary Fig. 18b). The sintered Sr–V–O nanowires did not form a specific crystalline phase after the crystal water was removed, which may be due to the higher formation energy of Sr–V–O crystals. The sample annealed at 450 °C (marked as SVO-450) was tested as an SIB anode. The electrochemical performance of SVO-450 is shown in Supplementary Fig. 19. Similar to Ca–V–O, SVO-450 shows sloping discharge/charge profiles. As expected, it displays both good rate capability and excellent cycling stability up to 2000 cycles.

In summary, we have shown that alkaline earth metal vanadates (Ca–V–O and Sr–V–O) are promising SIB anodes. The CaV4O9 nanowires possess a specific Na+ storage mechanism beyond the typical intercalation or conversion reaction and exhibit multiple positive electrochemical properties, including good electric conductivity (>100 S cm−1), four-electron transfer with a small volume change (< 10%) and a self-preserving effect (from in situ Na-driven CaO), which results in a reversible capacity over 300 mAh g−1, a rate capability up to 5000 mA g−1 (25 C) and excellent cycling stability that allows 1600 cycles. Moreover, the sloping discharge/charge profile, with an average voltage of ~1.0 V, is beneficial to the safety of the batteries. Considering the exciting electrochemical properties and superior performance, together with the cost benefit of alkaline earth and vanadium resources, we believe these results will promote the development of SIBs. Moreover, our study also shows an unexploited field of alkaline earth metal vanadates for the exploration of electrode materials for Li/Na-ion batteries or even rechargeable Zn/Mg/Ca-ion batteries, and thus may open new directions in energy storages.


Materials synthesis

In a typical synthesis, 2 mmol of V2O5 was dispersed into 30 ml of deionized water, and then 5 ml of H2O2 was added dropwise. After stirring for 20 min, a clear, transparent orange solution was obtained. Then, 90 mmol of CaCl2 was added to the orange solution. After all the CaCl2 was added, a drastic exothermic reaction was observed, and a dark red suspension was obtained. The suspension was stirred for an additional 2 h and was then transferred into a 50 ml Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave. The autoclave was sealed and maintained at 200 °C for 4 days and was then cooled to room temperature. The orange products were dispersed in 30 ml of deionized water to form a homogeneous suspension, and washed with deionized water four times and rinsed with ethanol one time. After drying at 70 °C for 24 h, the sample was annealed in an H2/Ar (5/95) atmosphere at a heating rate of 2 °C min−1. The as-synthesized samples of CVO-450 and CVO-550 were annealed at 450 °C and 550 °C, respectively, for 8 h. For Sr–V–O, 20 ml of deionized water and 100 mmol of SrCl2·6H2O were used in the hydrothermal process, and the other processes were the same. For comparison, VO2-450 was synthesized without the addition of CaCl2 or SrCl2 in the hydrothermal process, and all other processes were the same.


The crystal phases of the products were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction using a Bruker D8 Discover X-ray diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kα radiation source. Scanning electron microscopy images were collected using a JEOL-7100F microscope. EDS mapping was recorded using an Oxford EDS IE250 system. TEM, HRTEM and SAED were performed using a JEOL JEM-2100F STEM/EDS microscope at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. ICP results were measured by a PerkinElmer Optima 4300DV spectrometer. TG/DTG was performed using a Netzsch STA 449F3 simultaneous thermal analyzer at a heating rate of 2 °C min−1 in Ar. FT-IR transmittance spectra were measured using a 60-SXB IR spectrometer with paraffin oil as the dispersant. XPS was recorded with a VG Multilab 2000.

Electrochemical measurements

To conduct the electrochemical measurements, 2016 coin cells were assembled in a glove box filled with pure Ar gas. The working electrodes were prepared by mixing 70% active material, 20% acetylene black and 10% carboxyl methyl cellulose binder, and spreading mixture on a copper foil. The electrodes were cut into small wafers with a diameter of 1.0 cm. The mass loading of active material was 1.0–2.0 mg cm−2. For the sodium half cells, Na discs were used as both the counter and reference electrodes. The electrolyte was composed of 1 M NaClO4 dissolved in a mixture of ethylene carbonate (EC)/dimethyl carbonate (DMC) (1:1 w/w) with 5% fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC), and a Whatman glass microfiber filter (Grade GF/F) was used as the separator. The Na-ion full cells were fabricated using the same separator and electrolyte as the half cells, with CVO-450 as the anode and Na3V2(PO4)3/C nanoparticles as the cathode. Galvanostatic charge/discharge measurements were performed with a multi-channel battery testing system (LAND CT2001A). CV and EIS were recorded with an electrochemical workstation (Autolab PGSTAT 302 N). For the in situ XRD test, the cell was assembled with an X-ray-transparent beryllium window as the current collector, and the electrode was placed behind it. The cell was cycled at a current density of 200 mA g−1, meanwhile, the in situ XRD patterns were collected with a planar detector every 3 min.

Ab initio calculations

We have used the first-principles pseudopotential plane-wave method based on the DFT incorporated into the CASTEP computational code63. The exchange and correlation potentials are described in the framework of the generalized gradient approximation64. A plane-wave basis was employed with an energy cutoff of 500 eV. All geometries were optimized and total energy calculated, convergence criteria were set to 5 × 10−6 eV and 0.01 eV·Å−1 for energy and force, respectively.

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files and can be requested by writing to the corresponding authors.


  1. 1.

    Chu, S. & Majumdar, A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature 488, 294–303 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dunn, B., Kamath, H. & Tarascon, J. M. Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices. Science 334, 928–935 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Larcher, D. & Tarascon, J. M. Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage. Nat. Chem. 7, 19–29 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yabuuchi, N., Kubota, K., Dahbi, M. & Komaba, S. Research development on sodium-ion batteries. Chem. Rev. 114, 11636–11682 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Slater, M. D., Kim, D., Lee, E. & Johnson, C. S. Sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 947–958 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kim, S. W., Seo, D. H., Ma, X., Ceder, G. & Kang, K. Electrode materials for rechargeable sodium-ion batteries: potential alternatives to current lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2, 710–721 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kim, H. et al. Recent progress in electrode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1600943 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Pan, H., Hu, Y. S. & Chen, L. Room-temperature stationary sodium-ion batteries for large-scale electric energy storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 2338–2360 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kundu, D., Talaie, E., Duffort, V. & Nazar, L. F. The emerging chemistry of sodium ion batteries for electrochemical energy storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 3431–3448 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Liu, Y., Merinov, B. V. & Goddard, W. A. Origin of low sodium capacity in graphite and generally weak substrate binding of Na and Mg among alkali and alkaline earth metals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 3735–3739 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yabuuchi, N. et al. P2-type Nax[Fe1/2Mn1/2]O2 made from earth-abundant elements for rechargeable Na batteries. Nat. Mater. 11, 512–517 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kim, J. et al. Unexpected discovery of low-cost maricite NaFePO4 as a high-performance electrode for Na-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 540–545 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Singh, P., Shiva, K., Celio, H. & Goodenough, J. B. Eldfellite, NaFe(SO4)2: an intercalation cathode host for low-cost Na-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 3000–3005 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rui, X., Sun, W., Wu, C., Yu, Y. & Yan, Q. An advanced sodium-ion battery composed of carbon coated Na3V2(PO4)3 in a porous graphene network. Adv. Mater. 27, 6670–6676 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Talaie, E., Duffort, V., Smith, H. L., Fultz, B. & Nazar, L. F. Structure of the high voltage phase of layered P2-Na2/3−z[Mn1/2Fe1/2]O2 and the positive effect of Ni substitution on its stability. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 2512–2523 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Niu, C. et al. General synthesis of complex nanotubes by gradient electrospinning and controlled pyrolysis. Nat. Commun. 6, 7402 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Cao, Y. et al. Reversible sodium ion insertion in single crystalline manganese oxide nanowires with long cycle life. Adv. Mater. 23, 3155–3160 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kang, H. et al. Update on anode materials for Na-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 1739–1750 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Luo, W. et al. Low-surface-area hard carbon anode for Na-ion batteries via graphene oxide as a dehydration agent. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 2626–2631 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cao, Y. et al. Sodium ion insertion in hollow carbon nanowires for battery applications. Nano Lett. 12, 3783–3787 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wen, Y. et al. Expanded graphite as superior anode for sodium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 5, 4033 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Xu, C. et al. Carbon-coated hierarchical NaTi2(PO4)3 mesoporous microflowers with superior sodium storage performance. Nano Energy 28, 224–231 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Pan, H. et al. Sodium storage and transport properties in layered Na2Ti3O7 for room-temperature sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 3, 1186–1194 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wu, D. et al. NaTiO2: A layered anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 195–202 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Senguttuvan, P. et al. Low-potential sodium insertion in a NASICON-type structure through the Ti(III)/Ti(II) redox couple. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 3897–3903 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kim, K. T. et al. Anatase titania nanorods as an intercalation anode material for rechargeable sodium batteries. Nano Lett. 14, 416–422 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wang, Y. et al. A zero-strain layered metal oxide as the negative electrode for long-life sodium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 4, 2365 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zhang, K., Hu, Z., Liu, X., Tao, Z. & Chen, J. FeSe2 microspheres as a high-performance anode material for Na-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 27, 3305–3309 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wang, Y. X. et al. Uniform yolk-shell iron sulfide–carbon nanospheres for superior sodium–iron sulfide batteries. Nat. Commun. 6, 8689 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Zhang, N. et al. 3D porous γ-Fe2O3@C nanocomposite as high-performance anode material of Na-Ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1401123 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Liang, L. et al. Large-scale highly ordered Sb nanorod array anodes with high capacity and rate capability for sodium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 2954–2962 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Liu, J. et al. Uniform yolk–shell Sn4P3@C nanospheres as high-capacity and cycle-stable anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 3531–3538 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Liu, Y., Zhang, N., Jiao, L. & Chen, J. Tin nanodots encapsulated in porous nitrogen-doped carbon nanofibers as a free-standing anode for advanced sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 27, 6702–6707 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sun, J. et al. A phosphorene-graphene hybrid material as a high-capacity anode for sodium-ion batteries. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 980–985 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Gu, M. et al. Probing the failure mechanism of SnO2 nanowires for sodium-ion batteries. Nano Lett. 13, 5203–5211 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wang, J., Eng, C., Chen-Wiegart, Y. C. K. & Wang, J. Probing three-dimensional sodiation-desodiation equilibrium in sodium-ion batteries by in situ hard X-ray nanotomography. Nat. Commun. 6, 7496 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Liu, Q. et al. Graphene-modified nanostructured vanadium pentoxide hybrids with extraordinary electrochemical performance for Li-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 6, 6127 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Li, Y. et al. Leaf-like V2O5 nanosheets fabricated by a facile green approach as high energy cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 3, 1171–1175 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wang, J. et al. Multi-shelled metal oxides prepared via an anion-adsorption mechanism for lithium-ion batteries. Nat. Energy 1, 16050 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Chao, D. et al. Graphene quantum dots coated VO2 arrays for highly durable electrodes for Li and Na ion batteries. Nano Lett. 15, 565–573 (2014).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Augustyn, V. & Dunn, B. Low-potential lithium-ion reactivity of vanadium oxide aerogels. Electrochim. Acta 88, 530–535 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Chae, O. B. et al. Reversible lithium storage at highly populated vacant sites in an amorphous vanadium pentoxide electrode. Chem. Mater. 26, 5874–5881 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Zhao, Y. et al. Stable alkali metal ion intercalation compounds as optimized metal oxide nanowire cathodes for lithium batteries. Nano Lett. 15, 2180–2185 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Yang, G., Cui, H., Yang, G. & Wang, C. Self-assembly of Co3V2O8 multilayered nanosheets: controllable synthesis, excellent Li-storage properties, and investigation of electrochemical mechanism. ACS Nano 8, 4474–4487 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kundu, D., Adams, B. D., Duffort, V., Vajargah, S. H. & Nazar, L. F. A high-capacity and long-life aqueous rechargeable zinc battery using a metal oxide intercalation cathode. Nat. Energy 1, 16119 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Sheng, J. et al. Metastable amorphous chromium-vanadium oxide nanoparticles with superior performance as a new lithium battery cathode. Nano Res. 7, 1604–1612 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Chernova, N. A., Roppolo, M., Dillon, A. C. & Whittingham, M. S. Layered vanadium and molybdenum oxides: batteries and electrochromics. J. Mater. Chem. 19, 2526–2552 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Wu, C. & Xie, Y. Promising vanadium oxide and hydroxide nanostructures: from energy storage to energy saving. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 1191–1206 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Zhang, X. et al. Ultralong metahewettite CaV6O16·3H2O nanoribbons as novel host materials for lithium storage: towards high-rate and excellent long-term cyclability. Nano Energy 22, 38–47 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kim, D. W., Ko, Y. D., Park, J. G. & Kim, B. K. Formation of lithium-driven active/inactive nanocomposite electrodes based on Ca3Co4O9 nanoplates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 6654–6657 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Li, L. et al. Electrospun eggroll-like CaSnO3 nanotubes with high lithium storage performance. Nanoscale 5, 134–138 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Reddy, M. V., Subba Rao, G. V. & Chowdari, B. V. R. Metal oxides and oxysalts as anode materials for Li ion batteries. Chem. Rev. 113, 5364–5457 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Chan, C. K. et al. High-performance lithium battery anodes using silicon nanowires. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 31–35 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Mai, L., Tian, X., Xu, X., Chang, L. & Xu, L. Nanowire electrodes for electrochemical energy storage devices. Chem. Rev. 114, 11828–11862 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Poizot, P., Laruelle, S., Grugeon, S., Dupont, L. & Tarascon, J. M. Nano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Nature 407, 496–499 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Hu, Y. Y. et al. Origin of additional capacities in metal oxide lithium-ion battery electrodes. Nat. Mater. 12, 1130–1136 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Kim, H. et al. Understanding origin of voltage hysteresis in conversion reaction for Na rechargeable batteries: the case of cobalt oxides. Adv. Funct. Mater 26, 5042–5050 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Zhang, L. et al. Correlated metals as transparent conductors. Nat. Mater 15, 204–210 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Brezesinski, T., Wang, J., Tolbert, S. H. & Dunn, B. Ordered mesoporous α-MoO3 with iso-oriented nanocrystalline walls for thin-film pseudocapacitors. Nat. Mater 9, 146–151 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Augustyn, V. et al. High-rate electrochemical energy storage through Li+ intercalation pseudocapacitance. Nat. Mater 12, 518–522 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Shon, K. J. et al. Discovery of abnormal lithium-storage sites in molybdenum dioxide electrodes. Nat. Commun. 7, 11049 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Yan, K. et al. Selective deposition and stable encapsulation of lithium through heterogeneous seeded growth. Nat. Energy 1, 3 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Segall, M. D. et al. First-principles simulation: ideas, illustrations and the CASTEP code. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, 2717–2744 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFA0202603), the National Basic Research Program of China (2013CB934103), the Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (B17034), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51521001, 11404230), the National Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (51425204), Foundation of Science and Technology Bureau of Sichuan Province (2013JY0085) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WUT: 2016III001, 2017III009). This work is supported by the project of Innovative group for low cost and long cycle life Na ion batteries R&D and industrialization of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2014ZT05N013). L.M. gratefully acknowledged the financial support from China Scholarship Council (No. 201606955096). Special thanks are extended to Professor Xuedong Bai of the Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Science for his strong support of the in situ TEM measurement and Professor Dongyuan Zhao of Fudan University for his strong support and stimulating discussions.

Author information




X.X. and L.M. proposed and designed the research. X.X., C.N., X.W., L.P., L.H., and W.R. performed the materials synthesis and electrochemical analyses. X.X., C.S., and J.M. conducted the materials characterization. X.W. and J.W. performed the in situ XRD characterization and assembled the single nanowire devices. B.S. and M.D. designed and conducted the ab initio calculations. X.X., L.M., and C.N. co-wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chaojiang Niu or Bo Song or Liqiang Mai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, X., Niu, C., Duan, M. et al. Alkaline earth metal vanadates as sodium-ion battery anodes. Nat Commun 8, 460 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing