Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Development of vanadium-based polyanion positive electrode active materials for high-voltage sodium-based batteries

## Abstract

Polyanion compounds offer a playground for designing prospective electrode active materials for sodium-ion storage due to their structural diversity and chemical variety. Here, by combining a NaVPO4F composition and KTiOPO4-type framework via a low-temperature (e.g., 190 °C) ion-exchange synthesis approach, we develop a high-capacity and high-voltage positive electrode active material. When tested in a coin cell configuration in combination with a Na metal negative electrode and a NaPF6-based non-aqueous electrolyte solution, this cathode active material enables a discharge capacity of 136 mAh g−1 at 14.3 mA g−1 with an average cell discharge voltage of about 4.0 V. Furthermore, a specific discharge capacity of 123 mAh g−1 at 5.7 A g−1 is also reported for the same cell configuration. Through ex situ and operando structural characterizations, we also demonstrate that the reversible Na-ion storage at the positive electrode occurs mostly via a solid-solution de/insertion mechanism.

## Introduction

In 1991, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have historically graced the electronic industry setting off a new paradigm for developers, designers, and manufacturers of portable devices. Thirty years later, the impact of the LIB technology was eventually hallmarked with a long-awaited Nobel prize1, though its overall contribution to our everyday life will hardly be reasonably estimated over many years to come2,3. Nowadays LIBs fiercely rushed into larger-scale sectors of electromotive vehicles and stationary storage systems sparking provocative and rigorous debates over the abundance of Li resources to meet the demand of emerging applications. Indeed, lithium is a scattered metal, with key mines being few and geographically isolated such that the attention of the scientific community was brought to the next alkali metal, sodium, which is hugely available with plentiful and evenly distributed resources worldwide4,5,6,7,8.

Technology-wise, the transfer to sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) does not seem capital-intensive from a first glance, because those were supposed to preserve the conventional metal-ion battery architecture8,9,10. Similar to the Li-counterparts, prospective candidates for the positive electrode (cathode) materials are Na-based transition metal oxides11,12 with layered structures, and polyanion-based materials maintaining rigid polyhedral frameworks that ensure higher safety and better cyclability. Among the latter, a particular courtesy was paid to vanadium-based phosphates. The NASICON family with Na3V2(PO4)3 as the most prominent representative was thoroughly examined as high-power medium-voltage cathode materials (3.4 V vs. Na+/Na). Afterward, Na3V2(PO4)O2-xF1+x fluoride phosphates adopting the α-Na3Al2(PO4)2F313,14 structure were proposed as high-energy materials operating at a nearly 4 V average potential. Numerous studies on both classes of materials announced delivering specific capacities close to the theoretical values with a steady performance at high charge/discharge rates with additional encouragement coming from the possibility to extract the third Na equivalent per formula unit possibly giving a further boost to the specific energy15,16,17,18,19. However, a lot of efforts were spent to deinsert all Na equivalents from Na3V2(PO4)3 and related materials, but no tangible results were achieved15,19,20,21. Contrarily, in case of Na3V2(PO4)O2-xF1+x the reversible extraction of third Na can seemingly be realized by expanding the working potentials window to 1.0–4.8 V vs. Na+/Na at the cost of structural and cycling stability18. Therefore, the third sodium atom mostly serves as “dead weight” in these materials essentially diminishing their specific capacity. From this point of view, a more attractive formula would be NaVPO4F with one Na equivalent per one d-metal cation resulting in a theoretical specific capacity of 143 mAh g−1 being more than 10% higher than that for Na3V2(PO4)O2-xF1+x.

Although two polymorphs with the tetragonal (S.G. I4/mmm) and monoclinic (S.G. C2/c) structures were reported for the “NaVPO4F” compounds22,23,24, a closer look at their X-ray diffraction patterns and electrochemical data discloses their actual belonging to either Na3Al2(PO4)2F325,26,27 or Na3V2(PO4)328,29,30 (NASICON) structural type. It was shown in detail that a direct solid-state synthesis of NaVPO4F from a 1:1 mixture of VPO4 and NaF results in either Na3V2(PO4)2F3 or Na3V2(PO4)3 due to the pyrohydrolysis with the HF formation and/or VF3 volatilization at elevated temperatures31,32. However, the truly single-phase monoclinic NaVPO4F with the tavorite-type structure (further referred to as t-NaVPO4F) can be prepared via a hydrothermal route33. In contrast to its Li-containing counterpart t-LiVPO4F typically showing good electrochemical performance34, t-NaVPO4F revealed poor electrochemical activity attributed to high-energy barriers for Na+ diffusion in the tavorite-type framework33,35. A similar picture was observed for the sulfate-based analog, t-NaFeSO4F36, thus questioning the applicability of the tavorite structural type for designing cathode materials for SIBs.

Recently, a family of materials with the AMPO4X (A=(Li,K), K; M=V, Ti; X=O, F) general formula and a KTiOPO4-type (KTP) structure was discovered, showing much promise as high-power and high-voltage electrode materials for not only LIBs but also for potassium-ion batteries (PIBs)37,38,39,40,41,42,43. Here comes a reasonable question of whether the NaVPO4X stoichiometry can be stabilized within this KTP-type framework. In this paper, we propose a simple, efficient, and scalable synthesis approach for stabilizing NaVPO4F in the KTP structural type and demonstrate its practical application as a positive electrode active material for Na-ion storage. The developed cathode material is tested in a coin-cell configuration using Na metal or pre-sodiated hard carbon-based negative electrodes and a NaPF6-based non-aqueous electrolyte solution. In both cases, the positive electrode enables the delivery of high specific discharge capacities at various specific currents with relatively high average cell discharge voltage. Finally, via ex situ and operando structural characterizations, we demonstrate that the reversible Na-in storage at the positive electrode operates mostly via a solid-solution de/insertion mechanism.

## Results and discussion

A pristine NaVPO4F fluoride phosphate has been obtained in a single step from a hydrothermally prepared NH4VPO4F precursor44 (Supplementary Fig. 1) by reacting with a Na glutamate excess at low temperature (190 °C, see “Methods”). The as-synthesized samples of NaVPO4F were identified as single-phase without impurities. The synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction (SXRD) pattern of NaVPO4F was fully indexed using an orthorhombic unit cell with a = 12.7547(4) Å, b = 6.2716(2) Å, c = 10.6400(3) Å, and V = 851.12(5) Å3 (Fig. 1a). The Pna21 space group was confirmed by electron diffraction (ED) (Fig. 1b) showing 0kl: k + l = 2n, h0l: h = 2n reflection conditions. According to scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the NaVPO4F powder consists of well-shaped blocky rhombohedral particles of 0.6–0.8 μm in the longest dimension (Fig. 1a, inset and Supplementary Fig. 2).

The chemical composition of NaVPO4F was confirmed by a set of spectroscopic techniques. The Fourier-transformed infrared (FTIR) spectra of NH4VPO4F and NaVPO4F are compared in Fig. 1c. Importantly, NaVPO4F reveals no sign of stretching or bending modes intrinsic in NH4+ at 1515–1305 cm−1 and at 3370–2680 cm−1 compared to NH4VPO4F revealing intense NH4+ signals in these ranges. Moreover, NaVPO4F demonstrates an absence of crystal and surface H2O or structural OH groups, potentially replacing fluorine, since no characteristic bands in the 4000–3000 cm−1 and 1600–1400 cm−1 regions are detected. The 1200–875 cm−1 spectral region contains absorption bands corresponding to the stretching vibrations of the PO4 groups, whereas the overlapping bands located at 800–600 cm−1 correspond to the X–V–X (X=O, F) stretching vibrations and O–P–O bending vibrations. The Na:V:P ratio was determined by the energy-dispersive X-ray analysis in a transmission electron microscope (TEM-EDX) to be 1.01(5):0.98(6):1.01(4) which is in agreement with the ICP-AES data of 0.97(1):1.00(1):0.99(1) being close to 1:1:1 and corroborating well with the ascribed chemical formula (Supplementary Fig. 3). The TEM-EDX analysis also clearly confirms the presence of fluorine in NaVPO4F. The determined F content by potentiometric titration using a fluoride-ion-selective electrode corresponds to 0.9 ± 0.1 which well agrees with the formula. The 3+ oxidation state for vanadium is validated by electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) (Fig. 1d) being also in line with the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements (Supplementary Fig. 4).

Crystallographic parameters, atomic positions, and selected interatomic distances obtained with the Rietveld refinement from SXRD data (Fig. 1, a, RF = 5.07%, Rp = 7.73%, Rwp = 9.78%, GOF = 1.45) are presented in Supplementary Tables 1, 2 and Supplementary Fig. 5. NaVPO4F adopts a KTiOPO4-(KTP)-type structure built upon helical chains of corner-shared VO4F2 octahedra linked by PO4 tetrahedra through vertexes to form a robust framework (Fig. 1e) that encloses a 3D system of intersecting cavities accommodating Na+ ions. The unit cell volume is ~2.2% and ~4.4% smaller than that of the potassium-containing KVPO4F analog and NH4VPO4F precursor, respectively, due to a smaller ionic radius of Na+ compared to those of K+ and NH4+. As in all KTP-type fluoride phosphates, the fluorine atoms occupy two cis- and trans-positions in the vicinity of the V1 and V2 atoms, respectively (Fig. 1e). Average V–X (X = O, F) bond lengths are 2.00(1) Å for the V1 site and 1.97(1) Å for the V2 site being both characteristic of the V3+ coordination environment45 (calculated bond valence sums are 2.93(6) and 3.15(6) for the V1 and V2 sites, respectively).

NaVPO4F demonstrates a significant disorder of Na ions with the smallest distance of around 1 Å between the split sites. The Na ions are distributed over a series of partially occupied positions forming a 3D network in the tunnels of the “VPO4F” framework (Fig. 1e). Such distribution might indicate high mobility of Na+ ions via a simple hopping mechanism. The [010] high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) image (Fig. 1f) and [001] and [110] HRTEM images (Supplementary Fig. 6) also validate the refined structure. In the HAADF-STEM image, the bright dots correspond to the projections of V, P, and mixed V–P columns. The Na columns are virtually invisible due to the above-mentioned strong positional disorder violating the electron channeling. The specific lattice fringes on the HRTEM images are indicated.

The NaVPO4F framework encloses three types of channels, which might be suitable for Na+ migration. The topology and dimensionality of the migration system and migration activation energies were estimated using the Bond valence energy landscapes (BVEL) approach. It demonstrates the presence of continuous pathways penetrating through the entire structure in all three dimensions (Fig. 1g). This 3D Na+ migration pattern is different from that of the K+ ions in the potassium-based KTP-type KMPO4F (M = Ti, V) materials where helical 1D channels weaves around the crystallographic c direction46,47,48. To study the diffusion channels in more detail we calculated migration barriers with the nudged elastic band method within the density functional theory framework (DFT-NEB) for six independent paths (P1–P6, Fig. 1h). The energy profiles for migration paths (Supplementary Fig. 7) demonstrate that a percolating diffusion is allowed along the a and b directions with only 0.3 and 0.1 eV migration barriers, respectively. After creating one Na+ vacancy per unit cell in NaVPO4F the energy minima are not located at or close to the initial Na crystallographic sites but become more evenly distributed along the migration paths, which agrees with the experimentally observed pronounced disorder of Na positions. The migration along the b axis becomes slightly hindered in course of Na extraction, while the hopping along the a and c directions gets easier. This emphasizes that NaVPO4F should demonstrate good ion mobility in the whole range of Na concentrations, which is confirmed further by diffusion coefficient measurements and rate capability tests. Additional information and details on diffusion barriers are provided in Supporting information (Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Figs. 7 and 8).

The electrochemical energy storage performance of the carbon-coated NaVPO4F was evaluated in three- and two-electrode coin-type cells with metallic Na as a counter electrode. In both cases, it shows sloped galvanostatic curves with an average electrode potential around 4.0 V at 14.3 mA g−1 (1C is equal to 143 mA g−1 for the active material) that implies a solid-solution de/insertion mechanism preferable for the high-rate electrode materials, as it excludes the kinetically hindered nucleation of a new phase inside the pristine particles49 and slow phase boundary propagation due to buildup of stress and deformations50,51 (Fig. 2a). However, a short plateau-like region near 3.5 V with a ~30 mV hysteresis indicates a possible phase transition at the very beginning of charge involving deinsertion of ~0.15 Na+ per formula unit. The cyclic voltammogram (CV) (Fig. 2b) and differential capacity (dQ/dE) (Fig. 2a, inset) curves for the NaVPO4F electrodes also witness this reversible process at 3.51 V as characterized by a pair of sharp peaks with a peak-to-peak separation of 65 mV, followed by three pairs of broad symmetric peaks at ~3.7, 3.95, and 4.3 V with very low peak-to-peak separations (Fig. 2b).

Diffusion coefficients of Na+ in NaVPO4F (as determined from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and potentiostatic intermittent titration technique (PITT)) exhibit values in the range of 10–11−10–10 cm2 s−1 (Fig. 2e) exceeding those in structurally related α-VPO453 and AVPO4F38. Notably, a pronounced minimum in the diffusion coefficient appears at around 3.5 V with a sharp rise in the differential capacitance Cd implying a possible two-phase transition and associated phase separation. In addition, the diffusion coefficients at the initial extraction of ~0.15 Na+ are lower than the values after the anticipated phase transformation. The EIS spectra of the NaVPO4F electrodes show a high-frequency semicircle with a diameter of ~30 Ω mg (per mass of active material in a composite electrode) (Supplementary Fig. 10a), indicating the resistance of surface layers54,55. The low resistance of the surface layers to Na+ transport implies low reactivity of the material surface with the electrolyte. The medium frequency semicircle exhibits a pronounced variation with the potential suggesting it to be the charge transfer resistance54,56. The latter converges to a value of ~20 Ω·mg active material at the potential 3.6 V (Supplementary Fig. 10b) indicating fast ion transfer kinetics and ensuring low kinetic polarization during the cathode operation.

Further, the HC||NaVPO4F cells with the NaVPO4F cathode and pre-sodiated hard carbon (HC) anode were assembled to demonstrate the electrochemical performance of the 4 V Na-based electrochemical system. The electrochemical performance of HC in combination with a Na metal electrode is presented in Supplementary Fig. 11. Figure 2f illustrates the galvanostatic charge/discharge curves of the HC||NaVPO4F cell having a capacity ratio of positive to negative electrodes of 1:1 at 60 mA g−1 and 30 mA g−1 charge/discharge rates. The cell operates at the average voltage of 3.7 V delivering more than 130 mAh g−1 specific capacity (recalculated to the active mass of NaVPO4F) at 30 mA g−1 (at 23 °C). Noteworthy, the cell performance is dependent also on the performance of the corresponding anode material that mainly contributes to capacity fading at extended cycling. At 90 mA g−1rate, the HC||NaVPO4F retains 75% of the initial capacity after 150 cycles (Fig. 2f, inset), while the Na||NaVPO4F cell is capable of sustaining hundreds of cycles preserving more than 80% of the specific capacity (Fig. 2d, inset). Unlocking the full potential of the NaVPO4F cathode material requires the development of stable high-power anode material.

The phase transformations and related changes in the unit cell parameters in NaVPO4F during Na de/insertion were examined with operando SXRD (Fig. 3a–d).

The SXRD patterns reveal that Na+ deinsertion from NaVPO4F is reversible with the reflections almost fully returning to their initial positions and recovering intensities. Negligibly small volume change of 0.5% between the initial and cycled phases can be attributed to an insufficient discharge depth achieved at the cut-off potential of 2.5 V vs. Na+/Na. The charge and discharge processes can be considered reversible since no significant difference between the patterns on charge and discharge can be observed. The corresponding reversible contraction of the cell volume on charge amounts to ~4.5%. Peculiar changes at 3.5–3.6 V corresponding to the specific feature on the CV curves and PITT data described above, hint at a two-phase transformation presumably associated with Na+ ion (re)ordering (Fig. 3b). A similar peculiarity with the 212 reflection disappearing was observed for KVPO4X (X=O, F)39, and in KTiPO4F (related to a monoclinic distortion of Pna21 to Cm)47. In case of NaVPO4F, at these potentials with extraction of ~0.15 Na+ the orthorhombic symmetry preserves and a reversible Pna21-to-Pnan transition occurs as deduced from the analysis of the ED patterns for the recovered electrodes (Fig. 3e and Supplementary Fig. 12). However, from the structural viewpoint, this transformation is supposed to be minor since the polyhedral framework does not undergo pronounced distortions and the difference in the unit cell volumes between the two phases is less than 0.8% (Fig. 3d). For x > 0.15 the Pnan Na1-xVPO4F operates via a single solid-solution regime, as also confirmed with a convex hull calculation using DFT+U and cluster expansion methods (Supplementary Fig. 13).

To investigate the charge compensation mechanism in NaVPO4F the vanadium oxidation state evolution during the extraction/insertion of Na+ was studied via ex situ EELS measurements carried out on harvested electrodes charged to 4.5 V and discharged to 2.0 V after full charge to 4.5 V vs. Na+/Na (Fig. 3f). A pronounced shift towards higher energy loss is observed in the V-L2,3 edge for the electrode charged to 4.5 V vs. Na+/Na, which is related to the increasing vanadium oxidation state from 3+ to 4+. At 2.0 V, both intensities and positions of the L2 and L3 peaks recover their initial values that are characteristic of V3+ thus validating a reversible V3+↔V4+ transition in NaVPO4F.

In conclusion, we have developed and synthesized the k-NaVPO4F positive electrode material for sodium-ion batteries. In contrast to previously known electrochemically inactive tavorite-type t-NaVPO4F32,33,57, k-NaVPO4F with the KTiOPO4-type structure demonstrates attractive specific capacity of 136 mA h g−1 at 14.3 mA g−1 specific current, high C-rate performance stemming from low energy barriers and high diffusion coefficients, and extended cycling stability. Worth noting that this material delivers practical specific capacity of 136 mAh g−1 at 14.3 mA g−1 that is higher than the theoretical capacity of the commercialized Na3V2(PO4)2F3 (128 mAh g−1)18,58,59 as well as other known vanadium-based positive electrodes for one-electron V3+↔V4+ transition (Fig. 4), such as NASICON-type Na3V2(PO4)315,20,21, Na3V2(PO4)2F3 (or its closest relative, Na3V2(PO4)2O2F), β-NaVP2O760, etc. The V4+/V3+ redox potential in this material achieves 4.3 V vs. Na+/Na which is among the highest values for vanadium-based positive electrodes. This increase in potential in comparison to other closely related phosphates and fluoride phosphates might stem from the KTP-type structure peculiarities as also shown for Ti-containing materials adopting the same KTP structure and displaying high electrode potentials47. Moreover, among the vanadium-based positive electrodes with close specific capacity values, k-NaVPO4F is the only one that operates mostly via solid-solution Na-storage mechanism, while others experience single or multiple two-phase transformations which are also reflected by their plateau-like discharge voltage profiles (Fig. 4).

The full potential of the k-NaVPO4F cathode material is yet to be delivered which would further boost the achievable specific energy of next-generation sodium-ion batteries. Overall, this study validates that following the solid-state chemistry guidelines and principles when choosing a proper combination of chemical composition, crystal structure, and synthesis method, enables producing inorganic materials with appealing electrochemical properties.

## Methods

### Synthesis

NaVPO4F was synthesized by means of a solid-state ion-exchange approach in two steps. First, a NH4VPO4F precursor was obtained using a hydrothermal route according to the reaction (1). For this, sodium carboxymethylcellulose (0.200 g) was dissolved in distilled H2O (22 ml) under heating with vigorous stirring. The resulting solution was cooled down to room temperature. Then VOSO4 × 3H2O (1.0857 g, 98%, Reakhim), NH4H2PO4 (0.8627 g, 99% Sigma-Aldrich), (NH4)2HPO4 (0.9905 g, 99%, Sigma-Aldrich), N2H6SO4 (0.2440 g, 98%, Reakhim) and NH4HF2 (0.2850 g, 99%, Reakhim) were added to the solution one after another under constant stirring until a light-blue suspension is formed. Both NH4H2PO4 and (NH4)2HPO4 are required to maintain a neutral buffer solution with pH ~7. The resulting dark-blue suspension was transferred in a 30 ml Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave (Parr instruments). The autoclave was sealed and heated at 200 °C for 4 h. The precipitate was collected, washed several times with deionized water and once with acetone, then dried.

$$4{{{{{{\rm{VOSO}}}}}}}_{4}+\, 2({{{{{\rm{NH}}}}}}_{4})_{2}{{{{{{\rm{HPO}}}}}}}_{4}+{2{{{{{\rm{NH}}}}}}}_{4}{{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}_{2} {{{{{\rm{PO}}}}}}}_{4}+{2{{{{{\rm{NH}}}}}}}_{4}{{{{{{\rm{HF}}}}}}}_{2} +{{{{{{\rm{N}}}}}}}_{2}{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}_{6}{{{{{{\rm{SO}}}}}}}_{4}\\ \mathop{\to }\limits^{200^\circ {{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}}{4{{{{{\rm{NH}}}}}}}_{4}{{{{{{\rm{VPO}}}}}}}_{4}{{{{{\rm{F}}}}}}+{4{{{{{\rm{NH}}}}}}}_{4}{{{{{{\rm{HSO}}}}}}}_{4}+{{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}_{2}{{{{{\rm{SO}}}}}}}_{4}+{{{{{{\rm{N}}}}}}}_{2}\uparrow +{4{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}_{2}{{{{{\rm{O}}}}}}$$
(1)

The product was mixed with sodium glutamate (99%, Prime Chemicals Group) in a molar ratio of 1:5 and annealed at 190 °C for 10 h. The principal reaction follows:

$${{{{{{\rm{NH}}}}}}}_{4}{{{{{{\rm{VPO}}}}}}}_{4}{{{{{\rm{F}}}}}}+{{{{{\rm{GluNa}}}}}}\times {{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}_{2}{{{{{\rm{O}}}}}}\mathop{\to }\limits^{190^\circ {{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}}{{{{{{\rm{NaVPO}}}}}}}_{4}{{{{{\rm{F}}}}}}+{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}_{2}{{{{{\rm{O}}}}}}\uparrow +{{{{{{\rm{NH}}}}}}}_{3}\uparrow +^{\prime\prime} {{{{{\rm{GluH}}}}}}^{\prime\prime}$$
(2)

The “GluH” here designates the remaining partly or fully decomposed organic products and other carbon residues. Importantly, the described procedure enables obtaining pristine Na-based compounds with no residual NH4+ ions. The final product was washed with hot deionized water several times. For carbon coating, NaVPO4F was mixed with polyacrylonitrile, PAN (Mw 150,000, Sigma-Aldrich) in a weight ratio of 93:7. Then dimethylformamide (DMF) was added dropwise to dissolve PAN. The resulting viscous mixture was poured into ethanol to coagulate. Then the formed sticky slurry was dried at 60 °C under vacuum and further calcined at 525 °C for 2 h under argon flow purified from traces of oxygen using metallic iron powder.

### Material characterization

X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected with a Guinier camera Huber G670 powder diffractometer (Co-Kα1 radiation, 4–100° 2θ range). The synchrotron XRD experiment for NaVPO4F was performed at the MCX beamline (Elettra Sincrotrone Trieste) at a wavelength of λ = 1.03257 Å in a transmission geometry using a point fast scintillator detector62.

The Na:V:P elemental ratio was determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) using a Perkin Elmer Optima 5300 apparatus. The F content in NaVPO4F was determined via direct potentiometry using an ELIS-131F fluoride-ion selective electrode. Total Ionic Strength Adjustment Buffer (TISAB) was prepared by mixing 500 mL H2O, 57 mL glacial acetic acid (Merck), 58 g of NaCl (Sigma-Aldrich, puriss., p.a.) and 0.3 g of sodium citrate (Sigma-Aldrich, >99%). The solution volume was adjusted to 1 L. The solution was titrated to pH 5 with 5 M NaOH (Sigma-Aldrich, 50 wt.% solution in water). Fluoride standards were prepared from high-purity NaF (99.99 Suprapur). In a typical procedure, 12 mL of TISAB were added to 12 mL of fluoride standard or test solution and the volume of the flask was adjusted to 25 mL with deionized water (MilliQ, 18 MOhm). The solution was stirred, and the potential of the ion-selective electrode was determined after five minutes. The calibration curve is shown in Supplementary Fig. 14. A weighted amount of NaVPO4+yF1-x material was heated in 30% H2O2 with magnetic stirring until a transparent solution was formed. The resulting solution was diluted to 25 mL to reach the concentration of F 5 × 10−4 M.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was done using a Quattro S scanning electron microscopy (Thermo Fisher Scientific, LaB6 field emission cathode) in a secondary electron mode with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV. The energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) was performed on a scanning electron microscope (SEM) JEOL JSM-6490LV (W-cathode, operating at 30 kV) equipped with an EDX system INCA Energy+ (Oxford, Si-(Li)-detector) and on Titan Themis Z transmission electron microscope at 200 kV.

For the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies, ~10 mg of the sample was ground with an agate mortar under ethanol. The resulting suspension was deposited onto a carbon film supported by a copper grid. Electron diffraction (ED) patterns, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images and high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images were recorded with an aberration-corrected Titan Themis Z transmission electron microscope at 200 kV. Electron energy-loss spectra (EELS) were collected with a Titan Themis Z transmission electron microscope operated at 120 kV and equipped with a monochromator and Gatan Quantum ER965 spectrometer.

Thermal analysis was carried out with a TG-DSC F3 STA-449 apparatus (Netzsch) combined with a mass spectrometer QMS 403 D Aëolos (Netzsch) under Ar or dry air flow (50 ml/min). The powders were heated at 10 K/min rate in the 35–900 °C temperature range. Pristine NaVPO4F can be considered stable in argon up to 550 °C (Supplementary Fig. 15a). The residual carbon content in the carbon-coated NaVPO4F/C was estimated to be ~10 wt.% which was taken into account when calculating the specific capacities (Supplementary Fig. 15b). The material undergoes a decomposition reaction at temperatures higher than 550 °C, which is clearly shown by the appearance additional reflections and bands at XRD and FTIR (Supplementary Fig. 15c, d and Supplementary note 2).

The attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) measurements were performed with a stand-alone FTIR microscope LUMOS (Bruker) equipped with germanium ATR crystal and liquid N2 cooled MCT detector. Spectra were recorded in the 4000–600 cm−1 range with 2 cm−1 resolution and averaging of 64 scans. The reproducibility was checked by probing different spots of the same powder sample. The thermal behavior of NaVPO4F was also assessed by the temperature-dependent FTIR coupled with XRD analysis (Supplementary Fig. 13c, d).

The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements were performed using an X-band spectrometer with a high-frequency (100 kHz) magnetic field modulation (SPIN, Russia). Spectra were recorded with 2 mW input microwave power and modulation amplitude of 0.2 mT.

### Structure analysis

The Rietveld refinement of the NaVPO4F structure from synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction data was performed in GSAS-II program package63 with the KVPO4F structure (S.G. Pna21, #33) as an initial model with potassium replaced by sodium. Total Na sites occupancies were constrained to 2 (sum of two sites per asymmetric unit). Isotropic atomic displacement parameters were fixed at 0.01 Å2. The crystal structures were drawn using VESTA software64.

### Electrochemical measurements

For electrochemical testing, the NaVPO4F electrodes were prepared by mixing 80 wt. % of the NaVPO4F/C active material, 10 wt. % acetylene black (carbon Super-C) and 10 wt. % polyvinylidene fluoride (pVdF, Sigma-Aldrich). N-methyl pyrrolidinone (NMP, Sigma-Aldrich, anhydrous, 99.5%) was added to dissolve pVdF. The resulting slurry was cast on the aluminum foil (40 μm, graphitized, Tob New Energy, China) by a Doctor Blade technique at different thicknesses (100–300 μm). The electrodes were dried under vacuum at 110 °C for 12 h to remove residual NMP and cut into disks (16 mm in diameter). The active material loading after drying varied from ~2 to ~8 mg cm−2, the electrode thickness 15–50 μm depending on the loading and type of the further analysis. The electrochemical properties of NaVPO4F were evaluated using coin-type two-electrode cells with Al and Cu (15 μm, 99.9%, Tob New Energy, China) current collectors, 1 M NaPF6 electrolyte solution (NaPF6, dried at vacuum for 24 h at 25 °C, Alfa-Aesar, 99.5%) in EC:PC:FEC (47.5:47.5:5 vol., Sigma-Aldrich, anhydrous) in the amount of 70–80 μL (water content less than 20 ppm, measured by Karl Fischer titration, Mettler-Toledo, C20), glass-fiber separators (Whatman, thickness 260 μm, 1.6 μm pore size) and Na metal (Sigma-Aldrich, chunks, roll-pressed into ~100 μm foil and cut as 16 mm disks) used as both counter and reference electrodes. The galvanostatic measurements were carried out at 22 ± 1 °C using a Biologic VMP3 potentiostat. No climatic/environmental chamber was used for cycling tests, the testing room was air-conditioned at 22 ± 1 °C. For the electrolyte refreshment, the cell was disassembled in the Ar-filled glovebox, the working electrode was washed with PC and put into a new cell with a fresh Na counter electrode and a fresh portion of the electrolyte. This procedure was done to check if the performance decay is influenced by the electrolyte decomposition or material structure degradation. The specific capacity and current were calculated based on the mass of NaVPO4F.

Cyclic voltammetry, potentiostatic and galvanostatic intermittent titration and impedance measurements were done in three-electrode cells to ensure precise control of the working electrode potential. Three-electrode cells were stainless-steel coin-type cells with sodium disk as a counter electrode on a Cu current collector and a NaVPO4F/C working electrode on an Al current collector. Reference electrodes were fabricated by charging the Na3V2(PO4)3 electrodes (active material:carbon Super-C:pVdF ratio 8:1:1 by mass) to reach the state-of-charge of 0.5 as described previously65 and placed on a stainless-steel ring, separated from the counter and working electrodes by PTFE stoppings and glass-fiber separators. The potential of the reference electrode was 3.370 V vs. Na+/Na (the potential of a two-phase transition which accompanies the V4+/3+ redoх in Na3V2(PO4)366). All the reported potentials were recalculated into the Na+/Na scale. The average equilibrium potential of NaVPO4F was estimated by averaging the charge and discharge potentials at a low cycling rate of 14.3 mA g−1 to minimize the polarization effects. The average potential was found to be 4.0 V. The measurements were done in a coin-type three-electrode cell to exclude the changes in potential fluctuations at Na metal reference electrode provoked by surface reactions with the electrolyte.

### Diffusion coefficients measurements

Diffusion coefficients for Na+ ions in NaVPO4F lattice were estimated from PITT and EIS data following the approaches detailed elsewhere67,68. For the analysis of both the PITT and EIS data, the spherical diffusion geometry was adopted with the diffusion length 0.5 μm as estimated from SEM data. PITT measurements were performed in 10 mV steps with the step duration of 1.5 h in the potential range 3.4–4.4 V vs. Na+/Na. EIS measurements were performed in the same potential interval in the frequency range 100 kHz–10 mHz with a 5 mV amplitude; 7 points per decade were registered. Prior to the EIS measurements, the electrode was polarized potentiostatically until the current reached the background value of 0.1–0.2 µA cm−2. Parameters of EIS fitting are given in Supplementary Table 3. The equivalent circuit for the experimental spectra fitting comprised RCEI/CCEI (resistance and capacitance of surface layers), Rct/Cdl (charge transfer resistance and double-layer capacitance) contours and a finite spherical Warburg element (Supplementary Fig. 10b). MEISP software was used to approximate the experimental spectra to the equivalent circuit. GITT measurements were also conducted to calculate the diffusion coefficients (Supplementary Fig. 17 and Supplementary Note 3).

### Hard carbon preparation and electrode fabrication

Hard carbon (HC) anode material was synthesized by the hydrothermal method69. The amorphous organic precursor was obtained from a 2 M glucose solution in distilled H2O by treatment in a Teflon-lined autoclave (304 stainless steel) at 180 °C for 16 h. The resulting brown powder was collected and washed three times with water, and annealed in Ar flow (100 mL min−1) at 1200 °C within 5 h. Electrodes were fabricated by mixing the active material, carbon black (Super-C), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) in the weight ratio of 80:10:10 in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP, Sigma-Aldrich, anhydrous). The slurry was spread onto the aluminum foil (40 μm width, graphitized, MTI) with a typical HC loading after drying being 2–3 mg cm−2.

The electrochemical energy storage properties of HC anodes were studied by galvanostatic charge/discharge profiling in 1 M NaPF6 electrolyte solution (NaPF6, dried at vacuum for 24 h at 25 °C, Alfa-Aesar, 99.5%) in EC:PC:FEC (47.5:47.5:5 vol., Sigma-Aldrich, anhydrous), glass-fiber separators and sodium metal (Sigma-Aldrich) negative electrode. The experiments were done at various specific currents (Supplementary Fig. 11), and the extended cycling was carried out at 90 mA g−1 in the 0.01–2.50 V vs. Na+/Na potential range at 22 ± 1 °C using a Biologic VMP3 potentiostat. The specific capacity is calculated based on the mass of active material (HC).

### Na-ion cell assembly and testing

The HC|| NaVPO4F coin-type (CR-2032) cells were assembled with the 1:1 cathode/anode capacity ratio with pre-cycled NaVPO4F/C cathode and pre-sodiated HC anode electrodes to form CEI/SEI and tested in galvanostatic regime at 30 mA g−1 and 90 mA g−1 charge/discharge currents with the 1 M NaPF6 (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.9%) in EC:PC:FEC (47.5:47.5:5 by vol., Sigma-Aldrich, anhydrous) electrolyte and glass-fiber separators (Whatman) in the 2.0–4.4 V potential range at 22 ± 1 °C using a Biologic VMP3 potentiostat. The specific capacity (Fig. 2f) is calculated based on the mass of the active positive electrode (NaVPO4F).

### Preparation and ex situ measurements of the electrode sample

NaVPO4F electrodes for ex situ ED and EELS measurements were prepared by galvanostatic charge/discharge in Na||NaVPO4F stainless-steel coin-type cells to the specific cutoff potential (Fig. 3d–f and Supplementary Fig. 12). The cells were disassembled and the active electrode materials were harvested and washed with PC to remove the electrolyte residues in an Ar-filled glovebox, then deposited in a powder form onto a carbon film supported by a copper grid and transferred to the Titan Themis Z transmission electron microscope using a special vacuum-transfer holder for further ED and EELS measurements.

### Operando X-ray diffraction

Composite NaVPO4F/C electrodes for the operando synchrotron X-ray diffraction (SXRD) analysis were prepared in accordance with the above-mentioned scheme (see electrochemical measurements section, the material loading of 2–3 mg cm−2). The experiments were performed at MCX beamline (Elettra Sincrotrone, Trieste)62 at a wavelength of λ = 0.7293 Å in a transmission geometry using the marCCD-SX-165 2D detector. Modified CR-2032 coin-type Na||NaVPO4F cells with Kapton®-glued windows were fabricated and assembled with the NaVPO4F cathode material, 1 M NaPF6 electrolyte solution (NaPF6, dried at vacuum for 24 h at 25 °C, Alfa-Aesar, 99.5%) in EC:PC:FEC (47.5:47.5:5 vol., Sigma-Aldrich, anhydrous), glass-fiber separator (Whatman) and metallic Na anode (Sigma-Aldrich, chunks, roll-pressed into ~100-μm foil and cut as 16 mm disks). Before the operando experiment, the cells ran for one charge/discharge cycle at 20 mA g−1. The operando SXRD data were collected under a galvanostatic cycling with potential limitation (GCPL) experiment at 20 mA g−1 charge and 10 mA g−1 discharge rates in the potential range of 2.5–4.6 V vs. Na+/Na using a Biologic SP-150 potentiostat at 22 ± 2 °C. 2D and integrated 1D powder diffraction patterns were processed with GSAS-II software63. The unit cell fit on operando data was done in TOPAS software70. The phases were fitted using a parametric approach71. The Pnan phase was allowed to vary cell parameters freely, while for the Pna21 phase the cell parameters were fitted parametrically using constant unit cell volume for the Pna21 phase and assuming this structure does not expand/contract during charge/discharge process. Weight fraction was varied freely.

### Bond valence energy landscape (BVEL) method

The Bond Valence Energy Landscapes (BVEL) analysis of the Na+ migration pathways was performed using the 3DBVSMAPPER2.0 software72 in the VPO4F framework. The details and theory behind the method as well as its applications can be found elsewhere57,73,74.

### DFT calculations

The DFT calculations are performed using the projected augmented plane wave method, with the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP)75 and the high-throughput python-based package SIMAN35. We adopt generalized gradient approximation (GGA) to exchange-correlation functional and standard PAW PBE potentials76 with a minimum number of valence electrons. To take into account the strongly correlated character of the d-electrons of vanadium, a Hubbard-like correction is added within the Dudarev scheme77 and U value of 3.1 eV, which was used in our previous studies for KVPO4F and RbVPO4F46. Gaussian smearing with a smearing width of 0.1 eV was used for Brillouin-zone integrations. All calculations were performed with spin polarization with the ferromagnetic ground state. The energy cutoff was fixed at 400 eV, the Gamma-centered k-point was 4 × 2 × 2 for the unit cell with 64 atoms. To eliminate Pulay errors the lattice optimization (ISIF = 4) was performed at constant volume for several contracted and expanded cells (seven points).

The migration barriers were determined using nudged elastic band (NEB) method and GGA PBE without U as implemented in VASP using the 1 × 2 × 1 supercell. The method allows finding the minimum energy path, which includes several intermediate configurations (images) between initial and final states. Five intermediate images were used.

The cluster expansion method, such as implemented in the ATAT code, was used to study phase stabilities78. The root of the mean square error of the energies from the resulting cluster expansion Hamiltonian with respect to DFT+U energies was estimated to be less than 0.015 eV per Na ion.

The initial crystal structure of NaVPO4F with the Pna21 space group was taken from the experiment. In all cases, after Na removal, full optimization of the unit cell and atomic positions were performed. The optimization was performed using a quasi-Newton algorithm until the maximum force permitted for any vector component was less than 0.1 eV Å−1 for NEB calculations and 0.05 eV Å−1 for all other calculations. The computational setup, including errors due to the periodic boundary conditions, has been estimated to provide the precision of 0.1 eV for migration barriers.

### Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

## Data availability

All data that support the findings of this study are presented in the manuscript and in the supplementary information file. The NaVPO4F structural data generated in this study (crystallography information file, cif) have been deposited to CCDC database under accession code 2176463 and can be found online at https://doi.org/10.25505/fiz.icsd.cc2c1sh. Raw data for transmission electron microscopy and operando synchrotron X-ray diffraction are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

## References

1. Kamat, P. V. Lithium-ion batteries and beyond: celebrating the 2019 Nobel prize in chemistry—a virtual issue. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 2757–2759 (2019).

2. Yoshino, A. The birth of the lithium-ion battery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 5798–5800 (2012).

3. Zubi, G., Dufo-López, R., Carvalho, M. & Pasaoglu, G. The lithium-ion battery: state of the art and future perspectives. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 89, 292–308 (2018).

4. Yabuuchi, N., Kubota, K., Dahbi, M. & Komaba, S. Research development on sodium-ion batteries. Chem. Rev. 114, 11636–11682 (2014).

5. Hwang, J. Y., Myung, S. T. & Sun, Y. K. Sodium-ion batteries: present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 3529–3614 (2017).

6. Palomares, V. et al. Na-ion batteries, recent advances and present challenges to become low cost energy storage systems. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 5884–5901 (2012).

7. Vaalma, C., Buchholz, D., Weil, M. & Passerini, S. A cost and resource analysis of sodium-ion batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 18013 (2018).

8. Delmas, C. Sodium and sodium-ion batteries: 50 years of research. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1–9 (2018).

9. Abakumov, A. M., Fedotov, S. S., Antipov, E. V. & Tarascon, J. M. Solid state chemistry for developing better metal-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–14 (2020).

10. Chen, L. et al. Readiness level of sodium-ion battery technology: a materials review. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2, 1700153 (2018).

11. Han, M. H., Gonzalo, E., Singh, G. & Rojo, T. A comprehensive review of sodium layered oxides: Powerful cathodes for Na-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 81–102 (2015).

12. Boev, A. O. et al. The role of antisite defect pairs in surface reconstruction of layered AMO2 oxides: a DFT+U study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 537, 147750 (2020).

13. Le Meins, J.-M., Crosnier-Lopez, M.-P., Hemon-Ribaud, A. & Courbion, G. Phase transitions in the Na3M2(PO4)2F3 family (M = Al3+, V3+, Cr3+, Fe3+, Ga3+): synthesis, thermal, structural, and magnetic studies. J. Solid. State Chem. 148, 260–277 (1999).

14. Chihara, K., Kitajou, A., Gocheva, I. D., Okada, S. & Yamaki, J. I. Cathode properties of Na3M2(PO4)2F3 [M = Ti, Fe, V] for sodium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 227, 80–85 (2013).

15. Chen, G. et al. Polyanion sodium vanadium phosphate for next generation of sodium-ion batteries—a review. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2001289 (2020).

16. Zeng, X., Peng, J., Guo, Y., Zhu, H. & Huang, X. Research progress on Na3V2(PO4)3 cathode material of sodium ion battery. Front. Chem. 8, 635 (2020).

17. Zhu, L., Wang, H., Sun, D., Tang, Y. & Wang, H. A comprehensive review on the fabrication, modification and applications of Na3V2(PO4)2F3 cathodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 21387–21407 (2020).

18. Yan, G. et al. Higher energy and safer sodium ion batteries via an electrochemically made disordered Na3V2(PO4)2F3 material. Nat. Commun. 10, 585 (2019).

19. Zakharkin, M. V. et al. Enhancing Na+ extraction limit through high voltage activation of the NASICON-type Na4MnV(PO4)3 cathode. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 1, 5842–5846 (2018).

20. Zhang, X. et al. Na3V2(PO4)3: an advanced cathode for sodium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 11, 2556–2576 (2019).

21. Jian, Z. et al. Atomic structure and kinetics of NASICON NaxV2(PO4)3 cathode for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 4265–4272 (2014).

22. Ling, M. et al. The mystery from tetragonal NaVPO4F to monoclinic NaVPO4F: crystal presentation, phase conversion, and na-storage kinetics. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202100627 (2021).

23. Zhao, Cde et al. Robust three-dimensional carbon conductive network in a NaVPO4F cathode used for superior high-rate and ultralong-lifespan sodium-ion full batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 17454–17462 (2020).

24. Ling, M. et al. Revisiting of tetragonal NaVPO4F: a high energy density cathode for sodium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 30519 (2020).

25. Barker, J., Saidi, M. Y. & Swoyer, J. L. A sodium-ion cell based on the fluorophosphate compound NaVPO4F. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 6, A1 (2003).

26. Ruan, Y.-L., Wang, K., Song, S.-D., Han, X. & Cheng, B.-W. Graphene modified sodium vanadium fluorophosphate as a high voltage cathode material for sodium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 160, 330–336 (2015).

27. Zhao, J. et al. A novel sol–gel synthesis route to NaVPO4F as cathode material for hybrid lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sour. 195, 6854–6859 (2010).

28. Law, M. & Balaya, P. NaVPO4F with high cycling stability as a promising cathode for sodium-ion battery. Energy Storage Mater. 10, 102–113 (2018).

29. Xu, M. et al. A 3D porous interconnected NaVPO4F/C network: preparation and performance for Na-ion batteries. RSC Adv. 5, 40065–40069 (2015).

30. Ling, M. et al. Superior Na-storage performance of molten-state-blending-synthesized monoclinic NaVPO4F nanoplates for Na-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 24201–24209 (2018).

31. Kosova, N. V. & Semykina, D. O. Mechanochemically assisted solid-state synthesis of sodium vanadium fluorophosphates. Solid. State Ion. 343, 115119 (2019).

32. Li, L. et al. Fluorophosphates from solid-state synthesis and electrochemical ion exchange: NaVPO4F or Na3V2(PO4)2F3? Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1801064 (2018).

33. Boivin, E. et al. Vanadyl-type defects in Tavorite-like NaVPO4F: from the average long range structure to local environments. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 25044–25055 (2017).

34. Kim, M., Lee, S. & Kang, B. Fast-rate capable electrode material with higher energy density than LiFePO4: 4.2V LiVPO4F synthesized by scalable single-step solid-state reaction. Adv. Sci. 3, 1500366 (2015).

35. Aksyonov, D. A., Fedotov, S. S., Stevenson, K. J. & Zhugayevych, A. Understanding migration barriers for monovalent ion insertion in transition metal oxide and phosphate based cathode materials: A DFT study. Comput. Mater. Sci. 154, 449–458 (2018).

36. Barpanda, P. et al. Crystal structure and electrochemical study of A(Fe1-xMx)SO4F (A = Li/Na; M = Co/Ni/Mn) fluorosulfates prepared by low temperature ionothermal synthesis. ECS Trans. 28, 1–9 (2019).

37. Fedotov, S. S. et al. AVPO4F (A = Li, K): A 4 V cathode material for high-power rechargeable batteries. Chem. Mater. 28, 411–415 (2016).

38. Nikitina, V. A. et al. Transport and kinetic aspects of alkali metal ions intercalation into AVPO4F framework. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A6373–A6380 (2017).

39. Chihara, K., Katogi, A., Kubota, K. & Komaba, S. KVPO4F and KVOPO4 toward 4 volt-class potassium-ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 53, 5208–5211 (2017).

40. Kim, H. et al. A new strategy for high-voltage cathodes for K-ion batteries: stoichiometric KVPO4F. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1801591 (2018).

41. Ding, J. et al. KVOPO4: a new high capacity multielectron Na-ion battery cathode. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1–8 (2018).

42. Fedotov, S. S., Samarin, A. S. & Antipov, E. V. KTiOPO4-structured electrode materials for metal-ion batteries: a review. J. Power Sources 480, 228840 (2020).

43. Chernova, N. A. et al. Vanadyl phosphates AxVOPO4 (A = Li, Na, K) as multielectron cathodes for alkali‐ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 2002638 (2020).

44. Alda, E. et al. A new vanadium(III) fluorophosphate with ferromagnetic interactions, (NH4)[V(PO4)F]. J. Solid. State Chem. 173, 101–108 (2003).

45. Gagné, O. C. & Hawthorne, F. C. Bond-length distributions for ions bonded to oxygen: results for the transition metals and quantification of the factors underlying bond-length variation in inorganic solids. IUCrJ 7, 581–629 (2020).

46. Fedotov, S. S. et al. Reversible facile Rb+ and K+ ions de/insertion in a KTiOPO4-type RbVPO4F cathode material. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 14420–14430 (2018).

47. Fedotov, S. S. et al. Titanium-based potassium-ion battery positive electrode with extraordinarily high redox potential. Nat. Commun. 11, 1484 (2020).

48. Kim, H., Ishado, Y., Tian, Y. & Ceder, G. Investigation of alkali-ion (Li, Na, and K) intercalation in KxVPO4F (x 0) cathode. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1–8 (2019).

49. Yu Vassiliev, S., Levin, E. E., Presnov, D. E. & Nikitina, V. A. Electrochemical patterns of phase transforming intercalation materials: diagnostic criteria for the case of slow nucleation rate control. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, A829–A837 (2019).

50. Joshi, Y. et al. Slow-moving phase boundary in Li4/3+xTi5/3O4. Small Methods 5, 2100532 (2021).

51. Wang, C., Kasavajjula, U. S. & Arce, P. E. A discharge model for phase transformation electrodes: Formulation, experimental validation, and analysis. J. Phys. Chem. C. 111, 16656–16663 (2007).

52. Kim, H., Tian, Y. & Ceder, G. Origin of capacity degradation of high-voltage KVPO4F cathode. J. Electrochem. Soc. 167, 110555 (2020).

53. Fedotov, S. S. et al. α-VPO4: a novel many monovalent ion intercalation anode material for metal-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 11, 12431–12440 (2019).

54. Nikitina, V. A., Vassiliev, S. Y. & Stevenson, K. J. Metal-ion coupled electron transfer kinetics in intercalation-based transition metal oxides. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1–28 (2020).

55. Landolt, D. et al. Common electroanalytical behavior of Li intercalation processes into graphite and transition metal oxides. J. Electrochem. Soc. 145, 3024–3034 (1998).

56. Gaberšček, M. Understanding Li-based battery materials via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–4 (2021).

57. Fedotov, S. S. et al. Crystallochemical tools in the search for cathode materials of rechargeable Na-ion batteries and analysis of their transport properties. Solid. State Ion. 314, 129–140 (2018).

58. Pu, X. et al. Recent progress in rechargeable sodium-ion batteries: toward high-power applications. Small 15, 1805427 (2019).

59. Bianchini, M. et al. Comprehensive investigation of the Na3V2(PO4)2F3-NaV2(PO4)2F3 system by operando high resolution synchrotron X-ray diffraction. Chem. Mater. 27, 3009–3020 (2015).

60. Drozhzhin, O. A. et al. β-NaVP2O7 as a superior electrode material for Na-ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 31, 7463–7469 (2019).

61. Ishado, Y., Inoishi, A. & Okada, S. Exploring factors limiting three-Na+ extraction from Na3V2(PO4)3. Electrochemistry 88, 457–462 (2020).

62. Rebuffi, L., Plaisier, J. R., Abdellatief, M., Lausi, A. & Scardi, A. P. MCX: a synchrotron radiation beamline for X-ray diffraction line profile analysis. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 640, 3100–3106 (2014).

63. Toby, B. H. & Von Dreele, R. B. GSAS-II: the genesis of a modern open-source all purpose crystallography software package. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 46, 544–549 (2013).

64. Momma, K. & Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272–1276 (2011).

65. Anishchenko, D. V., Zakharkin, M. V., Nikitina, V. A., Stevenson, K. J. & Antipov, E. V. Phase boundary propagation kinetics predominately limit the rate capability of NASICON-type Na3+xMnxV2-x(PO4)3 (0≤x≤1) materials. Electrochim. Acta 354, 136761 (2020).

66. Chen, S. et al. Challenges and perspectives for NASICON-type electrode materials for advanced sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 29, 1700431 (2017).

67. Montella, C. Discussion of the potential step method for the determination of the diffusion coefficients of guest species in host materials: Part I. Influence of charge transfer kinetics and ohmic potential drop. J. Electroanal. Chem. 518, 61–83 (2002).

68. Levin, E. E., Vassiliev, S. Y. & Nikitina, V. A. Solvent effect on the kinetics of lithium ion intercalation into LiCoO2. Electrochim. Acta 228, 114–124 (2017).

69. Katorova, N. S., Luchkin, S. Y., Rupasov, D. P., Abakumov, A. M. & Stevenson, K. J. Origins of irreversible capacity loss in hard carbon negative electrodes for potassium-ion batteries. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 194704 (2020).

70. Coelho, A. A. TOPAS and TOPAS-academic: an optimization program integrating computer algebra and crystallographic objects written in C++. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 51, 210–218 (2018).

71. Stinton, G. W. & Evans, J. S. O. Parametric Rietveld refinement. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 87–95 (2007).

72. Sale, M. & Avdeev, M. 3DBVSMAPPER: a program for automatically generating bond-valence sum landscapes. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 45, 1054–1056 (2012).

73. Adams, S. From bond valence maps to energy landscapes for mobile ions in ion-conducting solids. Solid. State Ion. 177, 1625–1630 (2006).

74. Adams, S. & Rao, R. P. Understanding ionic conduction and energy storage materials with bond-valence-based methods. in Structure and Bonding. (eds Brown, I.D. & Poeppelmeier, K.R.) Vol. 158, 129–160 (Springer, 2014).

75. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

76. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

77. Dudarev, S. & Botton, G. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA+U study. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 57, 1505–1509 (1998).

78. Van de Walle, A., Asta, M. & Ceder, G. The alloy theoretic automated toolkit: a user guide. Calphad Comput. Coupling Phase Diagr. Thermochem. 26, 539–553 (2002).

## Acknowledgements

This work is supported by Russian Science Foundation (grant # 20-73-10248, PL S.S.F.). The authors warmly thank Dr. Mattia Gaboardi and Dr. Jasper R. Plaisier for assistance with experiments at the MCX beamline (Elettra Sincrotrone, Trieste) and acknowledge the CERIC-ERIC Consortium for the access to experimental facilities (proposal #20192074). The authors are also grateful to Dr. Vladislav Gorshkov for the HC electrodes preparation, to Dr. Ivan Mikheev for the help with ICP-AES measurements, and to Mr. Daniil Panasenko for carrying out the potentiometric measurements. The AICF of Skoltech is acknowledged for granting access to the TEM facilities.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

S.D.S. performed the synthesis and electrochemical characterization, N.D.L. devised and optimized the synthesis procedure, I.A.T. carried out the crystallographic analysis and processed the SXRD operando data, D.A.A. carried out DFT calculations, A.V.M. and A.M.A. performed HAADF-STEM, ED, energy-dispersive X-ray, and EELS measurements, S.V.R. collected and interpreted FTIR and EPR spectra, A.R.I. and P.A.M. prepared anode materials, assembled full cells and performed measurements, V.A.N. carried out electrochemical diffusion coefficient measurements. S.S.F. designed the study and composed the manuscript, acquired funding. K.J.S., A.M.A., E.V.A., and S.S.F. supervised the study, planned the experiments, and analyzed the data. The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stanislav S. Fedotov.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

S.D.S., N.D.L., and S.S.F. report a patent application has been filed based on these results (RF patent 2748159). The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

## Peer review

### Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Xing-Long Wu and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Shraer, S.D., Luchinin, N.D., Trussov, I.A. et al. Development of vanadium-based polyanion positive electrode active materials for high-voltage sodium-based batteries. Nat Commun 13, 4097 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31768-5

• Accepted:

• Published:

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31768-5