Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Long-term outcome after grafting with small intestinal submucosa and collagen fleece in patients with Peyronie's disease: a matched pair analysis

Abstract

Advanced Peyronie's disease (PD) with severe penile curvature requires grafting following plaque incision or partial plaque excision. So far, the ideal graft material has not been identified although various grafts have been studied. In this first matched pair analysis we compared the outcome after grafting with small intestinal submucosa (SIS) and self-adhesive collagen fleece (CF). We retrospectively identified 43 patients after SIS grafting with complete follow-up data sets to be eligible for the present study. A total of 43 patients after CF grafting were matched case by case to the SIS group using the degree of preoperative penile curvature as the primary matching factor. Postoperative outcome was compared with the focus on penile straightening, penile length, potency, relapse rates and long-term complications. Median degree of curvature was 80° in each group. Mean follow-up periods were 31 months after SIS and 39 months after CF grafting. The CF grafting procedure was significantly faster than SIS grafting (80 vs. 104 min, p < 0.001). No major short-term complications were observed. Both techniques gained good long-term penile straightening rates. Relapse of penile curvature was observed after SIS grafting only. Postoperative penile shortening occurred more often after SIS grafting (28% vs. 5%, p = 0.007). With a mean preoperative IIEF-5 score of 16, the SIS cohort significantly differed from the CF cohort with a mean IIEF-5 score of 19 (p = 0.016). The median IIEF-5 score improvement was higher after SIS grafting (+4.5 vs. +1, p = 0.002). Diminished penile sensation was the main long-term side effect with low rates after both procedures (9% and 7% in the SIS and CF group respectively, p = 0.100). In this first matched pair analysis both techniques showed promising long-term results. CF seems to have advantages regarding duration of surgery and preserving penile length. More comparative studies with larger collectives are desirable.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chung E, Ralph D, Kagioglu A, Garaffa G, Shamsodini A, Bivalacqua T, et al. Evidence-based management guidelines on Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med. 2016;13:905–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gabrielson AT, Spitz JT, Hellstrom WJG. Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum in the treatment of urologic disease: current and future impact. Sex Med Rev. 2018;6:143–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hatzichristodoulou G, Osmonov D, Kübler H, Hellstrom WJG, Yafi FA. Contemporary review of grafting techniques for the surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease. Sex Med Rev. 2017;5:544–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Papagiannopoulos D, Phelps J, Yura E, Levine LA. Surgical outcomes from limiting the use of nonabsorbable suture in tunica albuginea plication for Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 2017;29:258–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Salem E. Modified 16-Dot plication technique for correction of penile curvature: prevention of knot-relatedcomplications. Int J Impot Res. 2018;30:117-121 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-018-0018-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hatzichristodoulou G. Grafting techniques for Peyronie’s disease. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5:334–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Levine LA, Lenting EL. A surgical algorithm for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1997;158:2149–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Levine LA, Larsen SM. Surgery for Peyronie’s disease. Asian J Androl. 2013;15:27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brannigan RE, Kim ED, Oyasu R, McVary KT. Comparison of tunica albuginea substitutes for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1998;159:1064–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hatzichristodoulou G, Gschwend JE, Lahme S. Surgical therapy of Peyronie’s disease by partial plaque excision and grafting with collagen fleece: feasibility study of a new technique. Int J Impot Res. 2013;25:183–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hatzichristodoulou G. Surgical therapy of Peyronie’s disease by partial plaque excision and sealing of tunical defect with collagen fleece: the sealing technique. Video J Prosth Urol. 2016;2:076.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kelami A. Classification of congenital and acquired penile deviation. Urol Int. 1983;38:229–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Egydio PH, Sansalone S. Peyronie’s reconstruction for maximum length and girth gain: geometrical principles. Adv Urol. 2008:205739. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/205739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hatzichristodoulou G. Partial plaque excision and grafting with collagen fleece in Peyronie disease. J Sex Med. 2016;13:277–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Knoll LD. Use of small intestinal submucosa graft for the surgical management of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 2007;178:2474–8. discussion 8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kovac JR, Brock GB. Surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction after dermal, pericardial, and small intestinal submucosal grafting for Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med. 2007;4:1500–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee EW, Shindel AW, Brandes SB. Small intestinal submucosa for patch grafting after plaque incision in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. Int Braz J Urol. 2008;34:191–6. discussion 7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Staerman F, Pierrevelcin J, Ripert T, Menard J. Medium-term follow-up of plaque incision and porcine small intestinal submucosal grafting for Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 2010;22:343–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cosentino M, Kanashiro A, Vives A, Sanchez J, Peraza MF, Moreno D, et al. Surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease with small intestinal submucosa graft patch. Int J Impot Res. 2016;28:106–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sayedahmed K, Rosenhammer B, Spachmann PJ, Burger M, Aragona M, Kaftan BT, et al. Bicentric prospective evaluation of corporoplasty with porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) in patients with severe Peyronie’s disease. World J Urol. 2017;35:1119–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chung E, Clendinning E, Lessard L, Brock G. Five-year follow-up of Peyronie’s graft surgery: outcomes and patient satisfaction. J Sex Med. 2011;8:594–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kozacioglu Z, Degirmenci T, Gunlusoy B, Kara C, Arslan M, Ceylan Y, et al. Effect of tunical defect size after Peyronie’s plaque excision on postoperative erectile function: do centimeters matter? Urology. 2012;80:1051–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sansalone S, Garaffa G, Djinovic R, Pecoraro S, Silvani M, Barbagli G, et al. Long-term results of the surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease with Egydio’s technique: a European multicentre study. Asian J Androl. 2011;13:842–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Da Ros CT, Graziottin TM, Ribeiro E, Averbeck MA. Long-term follow-up of penile curvature correction utilizing autologous albugineal crural graft. Int Braz J Urol. 2012;38:242–7. discussion 8-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Miranda AF, Sampaio FJ. Practical computerized solution for incision and grafting in Peyronie’s disease. Sex Med. 2016;4:e73–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Otero JR, Gomez BG, Polo JM, Mateo CP, Barreras SG, Cruz EG, et al. Use of a lyophilized bovine pericardium graft to repair tunical defect in patients with Peyronie’s disease: experience in a clinical setting. Asian J Androl. 2017;19:316–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Salem EA, Elkady EH, Sakr A, Maarouf AM, Bendary L, Khalil S, et al. Lingual mucosal graft in treatment of Peyronie disease. Urology. 2014;84:1374–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wimpissinger F, Parnham A, Gutjahr G, Maksys S, Baierlein M, Stackl W. 10 Years’ plaque incision and vein grafting for Peyronie’s disease: does time matter? J Sex Med. 2016;13:120–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zucchi A, Silvani M, Pastore AL, Fioretti F, Fabiani A, Villirillo T, et al. Corporoplasty using buccal mucosa graft in Peyronie disease: is it a first choice? Urology. 2015;85:679–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Knoll LD. Use of porcine small intestinal submucosal graft in the surgical management of Peyronie’s disease. Urology. 2001;57:753–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. John T, Bandi G, Santucci R. Porcine small intestinal submucosa is not an ideal graft material for Peyronie’s disease surgery. J Urol. 2006;176:1025–8. discussion 9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Breyer BN, Brant WO, Garcia MM, Bella AJ, Lue TF. Complications of porcine small intestine submucosa graft for Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 2007;177:589–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Erdogan D, van Gulik TM. Evolution of fibrinogen-coated collagen patch for use as a topical hemostatic agent. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;85:272–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Marta GM, Facciolo F, Ladegaard L, Dienemann H, Csekeo A, Rea F, et al. Efficacy and safety of TachoSil(R) versus standard treatment of air leakage after pulmonary lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;38:683–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Frilling A, Stavrou GA, Mischinger HJ, de Hemptinne B, Rokkjaer M, Klempnauer J, et al. Effectiveness of a new carrier-bound fibrin sealant versus argon beamer as haemostatic agent during liver resection: a randomised prospective trial. Lange Arch Surg. 2005;390:114–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Siemer S, Lahme S, Altziebler S, Machtens S, Strohmaier W, Wechsel HW, et al. Efficacy and safety of TachoSil as haemostatic treatment versus standard suturing in kidney tumour resection: a randomised prospective study. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1156–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Maisano F, Kjaergard HK, Bauernschmitt R, Pavie A, Rabago G, Laskar M, et al. TachoSil surgical patch versus conventional haemostatic fleece material for control of bleeding in cardiovascular surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36:708–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Usta MF, Bivalacqua TJ, Tokatli Z, Rivera F, Gulkesen KH, Sikka SC, et al. Stratification of penile vascular pathologies in patients with Peyronie’s disease and in men with erectile dysfunction according to age: a comparative study. J Urol. 2004;172:259–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kadioglu A, Tefekli A, Erol H, Cayan S, Kandirali E. Color Doppler ultrasound assessment of penile vascular system in men with Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 2000;12:263–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Weidner W, Schroeder-Printzen I, Weiske WH, Vosshenrich R. Sexual dysfunction in Peyronie’s disease: an analysis of 222 patients without previous local plaque therapy. J Urol. 1997;157:325–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Montorsi F, Guazzoni G, Bergamaschi F, Consonni P, Rigatti P, Pizzini G, et al. Vascular abnormalities in Peyronie’s disease: the role of color Doppler sonography. J Urol. 1994;151:373–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Jordan GH, Angermeier KW. Preoperative evaluation of erectile function with dynamic infusion cavernosometry/cavernosography in patients undergoing surgery for Peyronie’s disease: correlation with postoperative results. J Urol. 1993;150:1138–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lopez JA, Jarow JP. Penile vascular evaluation of men with Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1993;149:53–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Falcone M, Preto M, Ceruti C, Timpano M, Garaffa G, Sedigh O, et al. A comparative study between 2 different grafts used as patches after plaque incision and inflatable penile prosthesis implantation for end-stage Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med. 2018;15:848–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Rosenhammer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosenhammer, B., Sayedahmed, K., Fritsche, H.M. et al. Long-term outcome after grafting with small intestinal submucosa and collagen fleece in patients with Peyronie's disease: a matched pair analysis. Int J Impot Res 31, 256–262 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-018-0071-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-018-0071-1

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links