Abstract
We aim to assess the data of patients with hypertension in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan, collected in 2021 that were provided by the Japan Medical Association Database of Clinical Medicine. Data collected in 2011 and 2014 by the Kanagawa Physicians Association were used for comparative analysis. The target blood pressure (BP) achievement rates for patients whose target office and home BP were <140/90 mmHg and <135/85 mmHg, respectively, were 72.5% and 75.8% in 2011, 66.0% and 68.5% in 2014, and 46.7% and 83.3% in 2021, respectively. The target office BP achievement rate in 2021 was significantly lower than those in 2011 and 2014 (p ≤ 0.009). In contrast, there was no significant difference and improvement of the achievement rates for patients whose target office and home BP were <130/80 mmHg and <125/75 mmHg, respectively, among the three surveys. After the Japanese Society of Hypertension 2019 Guidelines were released, the achievement rates for patients whose target BP was tightened were significantly lower than those for patients with unchanged target BP (office/home, p < 0.001/0.04). The proportion of the patients who achieved their office and home target BP using more than three drugs was 38.5% and 20.0%, respectively. In the present analysis, we unveiled the current problems encountered in the clinical management of hypertension in Japan. In particular, efforts should be focused on the management of patients that require strict BP control.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data are available at Kanagawa Physicians Association Data Access for investigators, bound by confidentiality agreements. Contact details: Kanagawa Physicians Association, 3-1 Fujimicho naka-ku, Yokohama city, Kanagawa prefecture, Japan; e-mail: k-taishi@xc4.so-net.ne.jp (correspondence to Kazuo Kobayashi, MD).
References
Umemura S, Arima H, Arima S, Asayama K, Dohi Y, Hirooka Y. et al. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019). Hyper Res. 2019;42:1235–481.
Zhou B, Carrillo-Larco RM, Danaei G, Riley LM, Paciorek CJ, Stevens GA, et al. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet. 2021;398:957–80.
Guidelines for the management of hypertension for general practitioners. Hypertens Res. 2001;24:613–34.
The SPRINT Research Group. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2103–16.
Hatori N, Sato K, Miyakawa M, Mitani K, Miyajima M, Yuasa S, et al. The current status of blood pressure control among patients with hypertension: a survey of actual clinical practice. J Nippon Med Sch. 2012;79:69–78.
Hatori N, Sakai H, Sato K, Mitani K, Miyajima M, Yuasa S, et al. Changes in blood-pressure control among patients with hypertension from 2008 through 2011: surveys of actual clinical practice. J Nippon Med Sch. 2014;81:258–63.
Hatori N, Sakai H, Sato K, Miyajima M, Yuasa S, Kuboshima S, et al. A Survey of Actual Clinical Practice Concerning Blood Pressure Control among Patients with Hypertension in Kanagawa 2014. J Nippon Med Sch. 2016;83:188–95.
Liang L. The gap between evidence and practice. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26:w119–21.
Kobayashi K, Sato K, Hatori N, Miyakawa M. A questionnaire survey of general practitioners in Japan’s Kanagawa Prefecture for the Japanese Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension 2014. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2017;39:705–10.
Kobayashi K, Hatori N, Sakai H, Furuki T, Miyakawa M, Tamura K, et al. Comparison of questionnaire responses regarding awareness of Japanese Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension between 2014 and 2019 in primary care. Hypertens Res. 2021;44:1147–57.
Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:982–92.
Tanaka T, Okamura T, Miura K, Kadowaki T, Ueshima H, Nakagawa H, et al. A simple method to estimate populational 24-h urinary sodium and potassium excretion using a casual urine specimen. J Human Hypertens. 2002;16:97–103.
Chobanian AV. The hypertension paradox — more uncontrolled disease despite improved therapy. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:878–87.
Asayama K, Ohkubo T, Yoshida S, Suzuki K, Metoki H, Harada A, et al. Stroke risk and antihypertensive drug treatment in the general population: the Japan arteriosclerosis longitudinal study. J Hypertens. 2009;27:357–64.
Lloyd-Jones DM, Evans JC, Levy D. Hypertension in adults across the age spectrum: current outcomes and control in the community. Jama. 2005;294:466–72.
Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical Pr. Hypertension. 2017;2018:e13–e115.
Shimamoto K, Ando K, Fujita T, Hasebe N, Higaki J, Horiuchi M, et al. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of hypertension (JSH 2014). Hypertens Res. 2014;37:253–390.
Muntner P, Anderson A, Charleston J, Chen Z, Ford V, Makos G, et al. Hypertension awareness, treatment, and control in adults With CKD: results from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55:441–51.
Tocci G, Presta V, Citoni B, Figliuzzi I, Bianchi F, Ferrucci A, et al. Blood pressure target achievement under monotheraphy: a real-life appraisal. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2020;27:587–96.
Verberk WJ, Kessels AGH, de Leeuw PW. Prevalence, causes, and consequences of masked hypertension: a meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21:969–75.
Mills KT, Bundy JD, Kelly TN, Reed JE, Kearney PM, Reynolds K, et al. Global Disparities of Hypertension Prevalence and Control. Circulation. 2016;134:441–50.
Calhoun DA, Jones D, Textor S, Goff DC, Murphy TP, Toto RD, et al. Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment. Hypertension. 2008;51:1403–19.
Milman T, Joundi RA, Alotaibi NM, Saposnik G. Clinical inertia in the pharmacological management of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e11121.
Josiah Willock R, Miller JB, Mohyi M, Abuzaanona A, Muminovic M, Levy PD. Therapeutic Inertia and Treatment Intensification. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018;20:4.
Mu L, Mukamal KJ. Treatment Intensification for Hypertension in US Ambulatory Medical Care. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e004188.
Nishimura SYI, Higaki J. Survey of awareness of hypertension treatment among physicians and patients with hypertension. Blood Press. 2018;25:364–76.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to all participants and acknowledge the support of the members of Kanagawa Physicians Association who participated in our study. We also thank medical doctors in Japan who took part in J-DOME study.
Funding
There is no funding regarding of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing of interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kobayashi, K., Chin, K., Hatori, N. et al. Cross-sectional survey of hypertension management in clinical practice in Japan: the Kanagawa Hypertension Study 2021 conducted in collaboration with Japan Medical Association Database of Clinical Medicine. Hypertens Res 46, 2447–2459 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-023-01366-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-023-01366-z
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Optimal blood pressure and improvement of achievement rate
Hypertension Research (2023)
-
Hypertension paradox in Japan: the road ahead
Hypertension Research (2023)