Abstract
Among all the nutrients, nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) are the most limiting factors reducing wheat production and productivity world-wide. These macronutrients are directly applied to soil in the form of fertilizers. However, only 30–40% of these applied fertilizers are utilized by crop plants, while the rest is lost through volatilization, leaching, and surface run off. Therefore, to overcome the deficiency of N and P, it becomes necessary to improve their use efficiency. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) combined with traditional plant breeding approaches is considered best to improve the N and P use efficiency (N/PUE) of wheat varieties. In this study, we developed and evaluated a total of 98 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers including 66 microRNAs and 32 gene-specific SSRs on a panel of 10 (N and P efficient/deficient) wheat genotypes. Out of these, 35 SSRs were found polymorphic and have been used for the study of genetic diversity and population differentiation. A set of two SSRs, namely miR171a and miR167a were found candidate markers able to discriminate contrasting genotypes for N/PUE, respectively. Therefore, these two markers could be used as functional markers for characterization of wheat germplasm for N and P use efficiency. Target genes of these miRNAs were found to be highly associated with biological processes (24 GO terms) as compared to molecular function and cellular component and shows differential expression under various P starving conditions and abiotic stresses.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Wheat is the most important cereal crop in the world. Most of the world’s human population depends on cereal crops including wheat for their food and nutritional demand. Hexaploid wheat (2n = 6× = 42; AABBDD genomes), commonly known as bread wheat, originated from the combination of 3 interlinked diploid genomes having repetitive sequences accounting for approximately 80% of the total genome (~17 GB) (Venske et al. 2019). Wheat is in global demand and highly consumed in the industry due to its ability to make distinctive food products such as bread, biscuits, cakes, pasta, noodles, and grain alcohols, to name a few (https://www.britannica.com/plant/wheat). It is also consumed in daily diet as an important source of energy, iron, vitamin B, and proteins (Shewry and Hey 2015, Kumar et al. 2016). In the next 50 years, it will be a challenging task to meet out the food and nutrition demand for ever-growing human population (Ladha et al. 2016). The challenge is being aggravated by a decrease in cultivated land area, changing climate, food habitats, and reduction of nutrients in the soils. Nutrients in the soil serve as important limiting factor and play a vital role in the growth and development of wheat crop (Mathpal et al. 2018). The elemental nitrogen (N) have crucial role in nucleic acid metabolism, chlorophyll formation, and protein synthesis, successively results in increase in cell surface area, photosynthesis, and ultimately the growth and yield of plant. The deficiency of nitrogen can disturb plant biological processes like photosynthesis and yield-related traits such as grain weight and grain number (Fischer et al. 2013). Similarly, another macronutrient “phosphorous (P)” also plays a principal role in a set of biological processes including nucleic acid synthesis, respiration, and energy production (ATP) (Rouached et al. 2010). Elser et al. (2000) reported that 39% N and 9% P by mass is present in nucleic acids. Previous studies also showed that deficiency of either N or P leads to reduction in plant growth, development, and yield (Liu et al. 2016; Bogard et al. 2010; Xu et al. 2007; Longnecker et al. 1993). Therefore, there is need to supply these macronutrients to the soil in the form of fertilizers (Kulcheski et al. 2015). More “N” uptake resulted in increased crop production because cereal seeds reserve 6% N in the form of proteins (Ladha et al. 2016). It is estimated that plants utilized only 30–40% of applied fertilizers while the rest are lost through the surface run off, leaching, volatilization and denitrification (Plett et al. 2018; Correll 1998; Hirel et al. 2011). Nitrogen can also escape in the form of gases like ammonia (NH3) and nitrous oxide (NO), which in turn may result in eutrophication of water bodies (Kumar et al. 2017a). Along with harming the environment, it is also costlier for the farmers (Kumar et al. 2017a; Plett et al. 2018). The loss of both N and P results in depletion of their use efficiency by plants (Balyan et al. 2016). Therefore, to overcome these problems it is required to improve nitrogen/phosphorous use efficiency (N/PUE) of wheat, so that maximum amount of N and P may be available to the plants (Plett et al. 2018; Chiou et al. 2006). Various approaches like conventional breeding and molecular breeding approaches such as marker assisted selection (MAS), transgenic, and miRNA manipulations have been suggested to improve the N/PUE in wheat.
Several studies inculpated the significant role of microRNAs in plant growth, development, signaling pathways, biotic and abiotic stresses such as heat stress and nutrient starvation conditions (Sunkar et al. 2012). The microRNAs are small (21–23 nucleotides long), endogenous RNA molecules that regulate the gene expression by cleavage and post-transcriptional regulation in plants as well as in animals (Kim 2005). Numerous reports have shown the miRNAs involvement in crosstalk between N and P (Kumar et al. 2017a; Jones-Rhoades et al. 2006; Xu et al. 2011; Vance 2010). Expression of miRNAs can be up-regulated or down-regulated under nutrient-deficient conditions (Wang et al. 2021; Li et al. 2016; Hou et al. 2020). Earlier studies have demonstrated the involvement of miRNAs in remobilization, uptake, and production of antioxidant scavengers under nutrient-deficient condition (Fischer et al. 2013; Paul et al. 2015; Zeng et al. 2014). The miRNAs can modify the growth and development of roots and flowers under both N and P stress (Nguyen et al. 2015; Zuluaga and Sonnante 2019; Rouached et al. 2010).
Molecular markers help in refinement of conventional breeding efficiency by selecting those traits which are tightly linked to marker, phylogenetic analysis, and characterization of crop germplasm (Gupta et al. 1999; Kumar et al. 2021). Different types of molecular markers have been developed and are available for crop improvement programs (Gupta et al. 2013a, 2013b; Sihag et al. 2021; Tyagi et al. 2019, 2021; Kumar et al. 2021). Among these, simple sequence repeats (SSRs) or microsatellites are co-dominant, multi-allelic, highly reproducible in nature, and present all around the genome of wheat in coding, non-coding, and un-translated region (UTR) (Gupta and Varshney 2000; Mir et al. 2013; Mir and Varshney 2012; Kumar et al. 2021). Due to these characteristics, SSRs proved ideal for plant molecular analysis and population genetics analysis (Mir et al. 2013; Mir and Varshney 2012; Gupta et al. 2012). For genetic mapping of wheat, >4000 of SSRs have already been developed, and significantly more can be generated because already developed SSRs are present throughout the genome at a frequency of only 29.73 Mb (Gupta and Varshney 2000).
Previous studies have reported the SSRs presence in pre-miRNA sequences of different plant species like Arabidopsis, rice, and wheat in response to different abiotic stresses (Mehta et al. 2021; Lawson and Zhang. 2006; Kumar et al. 2017b). Singh et al. (2018) have developed 65 salt-responsive gene-based SSRs in wheat and validated them on 60 wheat genotypes for genetic diversity analysis. Mehta et al. (2021) designed 53 salt-responsive genes and miRNA-based SSRs in wheat and screened them over 54 wheat genotypes for genetic diversity analysis for salt tolerance. These studies proved the role of miRNA-derived SSRs and gene specific SSRs in improving the performance of wheat under different abiotic stresses (Sihag et al. 2021; Tyagi et al. 2021; Hou et al. 2020; Ahmed et al. 2020). Zhang et al. (2019) analyzed the regulation of miRNA under high temperature in maize. Kumar et al. (2018a) performed a bioinformatics-based study to gain structural and functional insight into N and P responsive candidate gene. Yet, to the best of our knowledge, no report is available in wheat on miRNA-based SSRs in response to N and P efficiency/deficiency.
Therefore, in the present study we identified, developed, and validated the miRNA-based SSR markers along with genic SSRs in response to N and P use in wheat. The most important and diagnostic miRNA-derived SSR markers will prove useful in wheat molecular breeding programs aimed at enhancing N and P use efficiency. The markers will also prove useful in characterizing wheat germplasm for N and P use efficiency.
Materials and methods
Plant material and experiment design
A set of ten wheat genotypes/cultivars were judiciously selected for the present study based on earlier published literature on N/PUE (Table S1). To calculate the actual N/PUE of these genotypes, the experiment was carried out in earthen pots containing 5 kg sandy loam soil following a completely randomized block design (CRD) in triplicates. Seven seeds were sown in each pot and seedlings were thinned to five plants per pot. The amount of N and P was applied according to recommended dose-150 kg/ha and 60 kg/ha respectively (Kumar and Singh 2019). Nitrogen was applied in the form of CaNO3.4H2O in two doses–0.18 gm (low) and 0.37 gm (optimum). Phosphorous was given in the form of KH2PO4 as 0.07 gm (low) and 0.15 gm (optimum). Other macro and micronutrients were supplied in the form of Hoagland’s solution as per Hoagland and Arnon (1950). Soil analysis for N and P was done by Kjeldahl’s (Subbiah and Asija 1956) and Olsen’s methods (Olsen et al. 1954) respectively. Agronomic data like grain yield per plant, harvest index, biomass per plant were calculated for all the genotypes (Table S2 and S3). The N/PUE of each and every genotype was calculated following Moll et al. (1982).
DNA extraction and PCR amplification
A fresh leaf tissue (100 mg) was used for genomic DNA isolation from each genotype by using CTAB method (Cetyl tri-methyl ammonium bromide) (Doyle and Doyle 1987). The quality of genomic DNA was determined using agarose gel electrophoresis (0.8% w/v). Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) was used to perform DNA quantification. DNA was diluted to final concentration of 60 ng/μl for PCR and stored at −20 °C for further use.
For PCR amplification, a reaction mixture of 20 μl containing 2 μl DNA template (120 ng), 10 μl promega green master mix, 0.5 μl of each forward and reverse primer (0.2 μM) and 7.0 μl nuclease free water (NFW) was prepared. PCR program was optimized as: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1.0 min, annealing temperature (50–58 °C) for 30 sec, extension at 72 °C for 30 sec and final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The thermal cycler products were resolved on 10% poly-acrylamide gels at 120 V for 4 h (Maniatis et al. 1975). The gel was visualized in Vilber Fusion Solo S gel documentation system, after staining with ethidium bromide (EtBr). The scoring of genotypes was done on the basis of absence (0) and presence (1) of a specific allele.
Identification and designing of N and P responsive miRNAs SSRs
An extensive literature survey was conducted to collect the N and P stress-responsive miRNAs reported in the model plant Arabidopsis and certain cereals crops namely, wheat, maize, and rice. Premature miRNA (Pre - miRNA) sequences of N and P responsive miRNAs were obtained from miRBase22.0 repository (http://miRbase.org/) in FASTA format (Kozomara et al. 2019). In order to find out the 1000 bp (500 bp upstream and 500 bp downstream of the premature-miRNA sequence) long pre- miRNA sequence, BLASTn search was performed against wheat reference genome data publically available on Ensembl Plants database (https://plants.ensembl.org/) (Bolser et al. 2016). Results of BLASTn gave multiple hits, the sequence showing the alignment near to 100% on 0 e-value were chosen and utilized for SSRs mining followed by primer designing. Primers with di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide repeat motifs were picked for primer designing by BatchPrimer3 v1.0 software (https://wheat.pw.usda.gov/demos/Batch Primer3/0) (You et al. 2008). Flow chart showing the representation of the process used for miRNA SSRs identification, validation, and characterization in wheat is presented in Fig. 1.
Development of gene specific SSR markers
Candidate genes associated with signaling, transport, uptake, and assimilation of N and P were collected from Arabidopsis, rice, and brachypodium based on the literature survey. Full length genomic sequences of these genes were extracted from different primary and secondary databases such as NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), TAIR (https://www.arabidopsis.org/), and MSU (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/) in FASTA format. BLASTn search was performed against wheat reference genome data available on Ensembl Plants database. The SSRs motifs were developed by using BatchPrimer3 v1.0.
Diversity analysis and population differentiation
The polymorphism information content (PIC) of each primer was calculated by using GeneCalc bioinformatics tool (Nagy et al. 2012). DARwin v6.0 software was used to calculate the dissimilarity matrix (Perrier and Jacquemoud-Collet 2006). This matrix was used for clustering of 10 wheat genotypes and for dendrogram preparation with unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) procedure by bootstrapping with 1000 permutations (Gascuel 1997). To categorize these 10 genotypes into distinct groups, principal component analysis (PCA) was also performed using DARwin v6.0.
Number of alleles per locus (Na), number of effective allele per locus (Ne), the Shannons information index (I), observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He) were calculated by GenAlEx6.5 (https://biology-assets.anu.edu.au/GenAlEx/) (Peakall and Smouse 2006). GenAlEx6.5 software was run for analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) to test the genetic variance among and between the populations (Shen et al. 2017).
Gene ontology and miRNAs targets identification
Mature miRNA sequence retrieved from miRBase v22.0 were submitted as a query to find the miRNA targets in cDNA library of wheat followed by identification of miRNAs target gene in response to N and P from psRNA Target server (http://plantgrn.noble.org/psRNATarget/). WEGO database-Web Gene Ontology Annotation Plot (WEGO 2.0, https://biodb.swu.edu.cn/cgi-bin/wego/index.pl) was used for gene ontology (GO) studies of identified miRNA targets by retrieving GO ID of target genes from Ensembl Plants database.
In silico expression profiling of miRNA targeted genes
Expression profiling of predicted miRNA targets was performed using RNA seq experiments embedded in Genevestigator platform (https://genevestigator.com/gv/index.jsp) (Grennan 2006). A total of 40 miRNA target genes were used for expression profiling. Transcript IDs of these genes were utilized as query while performing the expression profiling under different environment stress conditions as well as nutrition starvation in wheat. Hierarchical clustering tool was used to generate heat map of expression profiling as earlier described by Kumar et al. (2018a).
Results
Development of nitrogen and phosphorous responsive miRNA-SSRs in wheat
A total of 38 miRNA families and 8 candidate gene families responsive to N and P were identified on the basis of the literature survey. These miRNAs families consisting of 71 members, which were recognized from rice, Arabidopsis, maize, and wheat (Fig. 2A). During primer designing, no SSRs were found for five miRNAs i.e., miR1124, miR444, miR174, miR1117, miR1133, and one gene family i.e., TaPHT (TaPHT 1.6-4A, 1.6-4B, and 1.6-5D). Primers were designed by using BatchPrimer3 v1.0 and primers could be designed for 66 significant miRNA-SSRs and 32 gene-specific primer pairs. The repeat length in the SSRs varied from dinucleotide (NN)24 repeat to hexanucleotide (NNNNNN)4 repeat. Maximum numbers of miRNA genes were found to possess tetra-nucleotide repeats (45%) followed by tri- (40%), penta- (6%), hexa- (5%) and dinucleotide (2%) repeats. Maximum frequency of SSRs was found on wheat sub-genome A (40.4%) followed by sub-genome D (31.31%) and sub-genome B (28.28%) as shown in Fig. 2B. The N and P responsive SSRs were present on all 21 chromosomes of wheat except 3A. Maximum frequency (10%) of SSR loci was found on chromosome 5A, while the minimum frequency (2%) was found on 2A, 4B, 4D, 6A, and 6D (Fig. 2C). SSRs were also classified on the basis of their role in different activities/functions: catalytic activity (32.12%), signaling transport (25.91%), Transcription factor (TF) in stress (6.22%), and others (12.95%) (Fig. 2D).
Validation of SSR markers and allelic diversity analysis
Total 98 SSR markers (66 miRNAs and 32 gene-specific SSRs) were selected for validation using 10 selected wheat genotypes for their N and P use efficiency (Table S4). Out of these 98 SSRs, 74 primer pair amplified the expected product size range and showed the clear and reproducible results. Among these, 35 SSRs showed polymorphism, out of which 24 were miRNA SSRs and 11 were gene-specific SSRs (Table 1). The miR167a detected maximum number of alleles i.e., 5 alleles. PIC analysis indicated that the PIC value ranged from 0.19- 0.99; miR165b and miR837 had lowest PIC value of 0.19, whereas as miR167a, miR846, and TaPHT1.54A had the highest PIC value of 0.99. Polymorphic markers “miR171a and miR167a” were found to be superior/best for genetic diversity analysis of wheat genotype for N/PUE, respectively. The banding patterns of miR171a and miR167a (Figs. 3 and 4) also showed an association of these markers with phenotypic data of N/ PUE. Therefore these markers will prove helpful in the selection of N/P efficient and deficient wheat genotypes in selection programs.
Genetic Diversity Analysis
The binary scoring data generated from N and P responsive polymorphic SSRs were used for diversity analysis using DARwin6 software which clustered these genotypes into 3 clusters- cluster I, II, and III. The wheat genotype DBW16 with low NUE was found to be more diverse than other genotypes and found in cluster I. Cluster II contains genotypes with low NUE except WH147 which have high NUE, whereas, Cluster III contains all the genotypes with high NUE except HD2967 and Choti Lerma which have low NUE. (Fig. 5). In case of P responsive SSRs, Cluster I and II comprised of genotypes with low PUE whereas cluster III has all the genotypes with high PUE except WH147 which have low PUE (Fig. 6). 2-D Principal component analysis (PCA) also separated the 10 wheat genotypes from each other in response to N and P as shown in Figs. 7 and 8, respectively.
Population differentiation
GenAlEx6.5 software was used to obtain genetic diversity parameters. Allelic data of N responsive SSRs have a total of 138 alleles in two populations. Among them, 78 alleles were found in population 1 and 60 alleles were found in population 2. Number of polymorphic loci in population 1 (93.75%), was observed to be higher than in population 2 (84.38%) (Table 2). Allelic data obtained from P responsive SSRs identified a total of 112 alleles in both populations. Among them, 58 alleles were found in population 1 and 54 were identified from population 2. Population 1 was found to be more polymorphic than population 2. Number of polymorphic loci for population 1 was observed to be 85.19%, whereas for population 2 it was 81.48% (Table 3).
To test the genetic variance among the population, AMOVA was performed (Tables 4 and 5). Total variance of 12% was observed among the population, whereas 88% variance was within the population under both N and P deficient/efficient conditions.
Target identification
psRNATarget server identified the 40 targeted genes of N and P responsive miRNAs (Table S5). The identified miRNA targets are well established for their critical role in a plethora of biological processes such as uptake, transport, signaling, and remobilization of nitrate and phosphate and in floral development of wheat. Signaling molecules regulated by these miRNAs targeted genes including serine/threonine-protein kinase, inositol- tetrakisphosphate 1-kinase, calcium-transporting ATPase, E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase and transcription factor like NAC, 6 A, RNAC 1, EDR1, Auxin response factor (ARF), R1R2R3-MYB protein, AP2, WALLS ARE THIN 1(WAT1) related protein, and Zinc finger protein. These miRNAs regulate the target genes by two mechanisms- cleavage and translational repression. miR775 and miR1123 target the phosphate transporter, whereas miR837, miR1128, miR1137, and miR156h target the genes involved in N cycle like ammonium transporter, nitrate reductase, glutamate receptor, respectively, whereas no target was found for miR160a. Many target genes such as laccase, auxin response factor, serine/threonine-protein kinase, and glycosyltransferase were found the target of more than two miRNAs. Target genes such as peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were also found to have a vital role in antioxidant and secondary metabolite production under N and P stress. These metabolites help in scavenging of active reactive oxygen species (ROS) and protect the plant from photoinhibition under N and P deficient conditions (Poli et al. 2018).
Gene ontology analysis
GO studied by WEGO, categorized the miRNAs target gene’s function into three groups- “molecular functions”, “cellular components” and “biological processes”. For molecular functions, 16 GO terms were found to be associated with ion binding, membrane transport, ligase, hydrolase, etc. The 15 cellular components GO terms were most abundant in cell part, intracellular organelle followed by intrinsic membrane part. Most of the target genes were linked with the biological process (24 GO terms) like response to abiotic stimuli, stresses, and primary metabolic processes (Fig. 9). Hence, GO analysis revealed the role of miRNAs target genes in uptake, transport, and signaling of N and P.
In silico expression analysis of miRNA target genes
In silico expression profiling of 40 miRNAs target genes was studied using RNA Seq data available under N and P deficient conditions in Genevestigator platform (Table S5). Expression of these miRNA-targeted genes was analyzed in six anatomical parts, five developmental stages under nutrient and abiotic stresses (Fig. 10). Most of the targeted genes were expressed moderately in six anatomical parts especially in roots, crown, and shoots (Fig. 10A). However, the expression potential percentage was higher in leaf followed by flag leaf and shoot. Among all the genes used in this study, genes encoding the ser/thr protein kinase and purple acid phosphatase were found to be highly expressed followed by phosphate transport protein, whereas gene for nitrate transporter was down regulated in almost all tissues. Expression profiling of all the 40 target genes was analyzed at various developmental stages like seedling growth, milk development, dough development, inflorescence emergence, and stem elongation. Target gene glutamate receptor and phosphate transport protein were up-regulated at inflorescence emergence, whereas SOD up-regulated at milk development stage (Fig. 10B). Stage-specific expression profiling of these genes infers their role in development and establishment of wheat.
Under P starvation conditions, NAC transcription factor, zinc finger protein, and glycosyltransferase were found highly expressed (Fig. 10C). The expression profiling of these genes under low P implies their role in senescence and nutrient remobilization. Phenylalanine lyase and SOD were up-regulated under various stress levels. Flowering genes were down regulated under both nutrients and stress level. Therefore, expression profiling under stress responses also revealed the role of these genes in regulation of phosphorous metabolism under various environmental stresses.
Correlation among phenotypic and genotypic data
Efficient genotypes performed better as compared to deficient genotypes under both optimum and low condition of N and P. The phenotypic data of recorded traits showed clear differences between efficient and deficient genotypes under optimum and half dose of N and P (Tables 6 and 7). Two most promising/candidate markers (miR167a and miR171a) showed high correlation between genotypic and trait data. miR171a was found to be highly associated with phenotypic data recorded under N conditions as miR171a showed presence of allele in N deficient and absence in N efficient genotypes. Likewise, miR167a showed presence of allele in P efficient genotypes and absence of allele in P deficient genotypes.
Discussion
Wheat crop does not perform well under N starvation conditions but responds well when there is an adequate level of N (Vinod and Heuer 2012). Out of the total amount of N taken up by wheat plant, 70% contained in seed, and the remaining 30% is contained in straw. In fact, crop plants use the N in two stages (i) N uptake that operates the growth and yield potential, (ii) N remobilization to the grain that determines the grain protein content. When soil is deficient in N, both the protein content and yield get reduced (Hawkesford 2012; Balyan et al. 2016).
Apart from N, P also plays a crucial role in wheat development. It has liability in root development, grain filling, and tillering stage (Hasan et al. 2016). Wheat with healthy root system and good vigor will be able to absorb the nutrients and water efficiently from the soil (Kumar et al. 2018b). N as nutrient helps the wheat plants to grow vigorously, however without adequate P levels, optimum N will not be able to produce a promising yield of crop. P is mobile in all plant parts and required at the early developmental stage of wheat (Mehta et al. 1963). P plays an essential role in plant growth stages such as the flowering stage, seed production, root development, and at maturity stage (Adnan et al. 2020). In P deficient soil, plants show deficiency symptoms such as stunted growth, reduction in number of tillers, purple stems, and roots (Marschner et al. 1996). Therefore, these nutrients are applied to soil in the form of fertilizers to achieve a good start, high yield, and protein quality. But grain crops are found to recover only one-third of applied fertilizers, whereas the rest are lost in the environment through surface run off and leaching (Hawkesford 2014). Therefore, adoptions of strategies for the improvement of NUE/PUE of wheat varieties are needed.
Among all the molecular markers, SSRs are mostly used for marker-assisted selection, QTL mapping, and genetic diversity analysis as they are distributed throughout the genome (Gupta et al. 1999). Most of SSRs were obtained from un-translated and protein-coding regions but the presence of SSRs in non-coding regions of miRNAs genes has limited data (Min et al. 2017). Many studies have been conducted on miRNA SSRs in response to various abiotic stresses (Sihag et al. 2021; Tyagi et al. 2021; Kumar et al. 2017a; Zhang et al. 2019). These miRNAs regulate the gene expression through cleavage or post-transcriptional modification by binding to complementary sequences in target gene (Kim 2005). These validated target genes may be transcription factor, signaling molecule that plays a vital role in development, physiological processes, and in abiotic stresses (Li et al. 2016; Hou et al. 2020).
PIC value is a good measure to calculate the polymorphic information of each marker. Markers having PIC value >0.5 are more informative as compared to markers with PIC value < 0.25 (Botstein et al. 1980). In the present study, the 35 polymorphic markers showed PIC values between 0.19–0.99 with an average PIC value of 0.72. Thus, our study showed higher polymorphism than the previous studies (Singh et al. 2018; Mondal and Ganie 2014; Tyagi et al. 2021).
Binary scoring data for N and P responsive polymorphic markers clustered the 10 wheat genotypes in three clusters (both for N and P) on the basis of their genetic background. Mondal and Ganie (2014) clustered the 24 rice genotypes in 4 clusters on the basis of salt sensitivity. Sihag et al. (2021) clustered the 20 wheat genotypes into three clusters by using the 19 polymorphic heat-responsive miRNAs SSRs. Furthermore, Tyagi et al. (2021) performed the diversity analysis with seven polymorphic SSRs on a panel of 37 wheat genotypes which grouped them into 4 clusters, out of which one cluster contained both the heat tolerant and sensitive genotypes.
In the present study, AMOVA results indicated that largest proportion of genetic variation was within-population (88%), whereas only 12% variation was among the populations, indicating that the major source of variation is the variability of genotypes. Similar results of AMOVA were reported with 97% variation within the population by Tyagi et al. (2021). Shen et al. (2017) performed AMOVA on the data of 23 polymorphic SSRs that were screened over the 11 populations in Xanthoceras sorbifolia and revealed that 67% of total genetic variability accounted by variation between the population.
In silico expression profiling revealed the role of miRNA target genes in nutrient metabolism, growth, and development of wheat. As the data for N responsive miRNA target genes was not available at Genevestigator, therefore we searched for P responsive miRNA target genes in transcriptomics data at nutrient and various stress levels. Expression of these genes showed their role in five developmental stages and six anatomical parts of wheat. In our study, NAC transcription factor was found to be up-regulated under P starvation and environmental stresses, which confirmed the role of NAC in nutrient remobilization as reported by Borrill et al. (2017). In an earlier study, in silico expression profiling of NLP transcription factor was done in rice under N stress by using Genevestigator and NCBI-GEO. Expression of five NLPs was analyzed in 22 tissues and developmental stages, deciphered their role in nutrients, drought, hormonal, and salt stresses (Jagadhesan et al. 2020). Similarly, In silico expression of TaRKD and TaNLP genes were analyzed in wheat in fifteen anatomical parts and ten different developmental stages under various doses of nitrogen (Kumar et al. 2018b). Mehta et al. (2021) studied the tissue and stage-specific gene expression of 161 salt responsive genes in wheat by using Genevestigator database.
In an earlier study, it has been reported that miR171 and miR160 work in signaling pathway in root development in Arabidopsis. miR171 targets the SCL (SCARECROW-LIKE TF) and hence reduces the primary root elongation. Quantitative RT-PCR showed that miR171 up-regulated under N starvation condition and its expression was three-fold higher under N deficient condition as compared to N sufficient condition (Liang et al. 2012). In barrel medic, miR171 targets the Nodulation Signaling Pathway 2 TF (NSP2) in response to cytokinin (Ariel et al. 2012). A semi-quantitative and quantitative RT-PCR analysis disclosed that nine miRNAs including miR167a respond under P deficient conditions. miR167a up-regulated under P starvation and targets the auxin response factor 8 (Zhao et al. 2013). These recent findings verified our results that two miRNA families, miR171a and miR167a, play important role in the nutrient starvation condition in distinct plant species. miR171a can discriminate between N efficient and deficient wheat genotypes, whereas miR167a can distinguish the P efficient and deficient wheat genotypes. Accordingly, these miRNAs-based SSRs proved to be useful in breeding program to discriminate the wheat genotypes in N and P efficient and deficient conditions. Analysis of phenotypic data of all the 10 wheat genotypes also indicated that the marker miR171a and miR167a showed the linkage with N/PUE as well as with trait related data.
Excessive use of N and P fertilizers causes the environmental degradation and multi-nutrient deficiencies in soil which ultimately affects the wheat yield. In order to reduce the use of these fertilizers, it becomes necessary to develop the wheat varieties with high N and P use efficiency without compromising its yield. In this study, we identified 35 miRNA and genic SSRs in response to N and P. Out of these, only two miRNA SSRs- miR171a and miR167a were found to distinguish the N and P efficient and deficient wheat genotypes, respectively. These molecular markers will be highly informative and helpful in breeding programs to develop the N and P efficient varieties, which will further help in reducing the consumption of chemical fertilizers and their harmful effects on the environment without affecting the yield of wheat.
Data availability
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
References
Adnan M, Hussain M, Anjum MZ, Rehman FU, Bilal HB, Toor MD et al. (2020) Role of phosphorous in wheat production: A review. Int J Agric Sci 8(2):10–15
Ahmed W, Xia Y, Li R, Bai G, Siddique KH, Guo P (2020) Non-coding RNAs: Functional roles in the regulation of stress response in Brassica crops. Genomics 112(2):1419–1424
Ariel F, Brault-Hernandez M, Laffont C, Huault E, Brault M, Plet J et al. (2012) Two direct targets of cytokinin signaling regulate symbiotic nodulation in Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell 24:3838–3852
Balyan HS, Gahlaut V, Kumar A, Jaiswal V, Dhariwal R, Tyagi S et al. (2016) Nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies in wheat: Physiology, phenotyping, genetics and breeding. Plant Breed Rev 40:167–234
Bogard M, Allard V, Brancourt-Hulmel M, Heumez E, Machet JM, Jeuffroy MH et al. (2010) Deviation from the grain protein concentration–grain yield negative relationship is highly correlated to post-anthesis N uptake in winter wheat. J Exp Bot 61:4303–4312
Bolser D, Staines DM, Pritchard E, Kersey P (2016) Ensembl plants: integrating tools for visualizing, mining, and analyzing plant genomics data. Plant Bioinformatics 1374:115–140
Borrill P, Harrington SA, Uauy C (2017) Genome-wide sequence and expression analysis of the NAC transcription factor family in polyploid wheat. G3: Genes Genomes Genet 7:3019–3029
Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32:314
Chiou TJ, Aung K, Lin SI, Wu CC, Chiang SF, Su CL (2006) Regulation of phosphate homeostasis by microRNA in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18:412–421
Correll DL (1998) The role of phosphorus in the eutrophication of receiving waters: A review. J Environ Qual 27:261–266
Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15
Elser JJ, Sterner RW, Galford AE, Chrzanowski TH, Findlay DL, Mills KH et al. (2000) Pelagic C: N: P stoichiometry in a eutrophied lake: responses to a whole-lake food-web manipulation. Ecosystems 3:293–307
Fischer JJ, Beatty PH, Good AG, Muench DG (2013) Manipulation of microRNA expression to improve nitrogen use efficiency. Plant Sci 210:70–81
Gascuel O (1997) BIONJ: an improved version of the NJ algorithm based on a simple model of sequence data. Mol Biol Evol 14:685–695
Grennan AK (2006) Genevestigator. Facilitating web-based gene-expression analysis. Plant Physiol 141:1164–1166
Gupta PK, Varshney RK (2000) The development and use of microsatellite markers for genetic analysis and plant breeding with emphasis on bread wheat. Euphytica 113:163–185
Gupta PK, Rustugi S, Mir RR (2013a) Array-based high-throughput DNA markers and genotyping platforms for cereal genetics and genomics. In: Gupta PK, Varshney RK (eds.) Cereal Genomics II. Springer, The Netherlands, 10.1007/978-94-007-6401-92
Gupta PK, Kulwal PL, Mir RR (2013b) QTL mapping: Methodology and applications in cereal breeding. In: Gupta PK, Varshney RK (eds.) Cereal Genomics II. Springer, The Netherlands, 10.1007/978-94-007-6401-9_11
Gupta PK, Varshney RK, Sharma PC, Ramesh B (1999) Molecular markers and their applications in wheat breeding. Plant Breed 118:369–390
Hasan MM, Hasan MM, da Silva JAT, Li X (2016) Regulation of phosphorus uptake and utilization: transitioning from current knowledge to practical strategies. Cell Mol Biol 21:1–19
Hawkesford MJ (2012) The diversity of nitrogen use efficiency for wheat varieties and the potential for crop improvement. Better Crops 96:10–12
Hawkesford MJ (2014) Reducing the reliance on nitrogen fertilizer for wheat production. J Cereal Sci 59:276–283
Hirel B, Tétu T, Lea PJ, Dubois F (2011) Improving nitrogen use efficiency in crops for sustainable agriculture. Sustainability 3:1452–1485
Hoagland DR, & Arnon DI. (1950) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Circular. California agricultural experiment station, 347(2nd ed)
Hou G, Du C, Gao H, Liu S, Sun W, Lu H et al. (2020) Identification of microRNAs in developing wheat grain that are potentially involved in regulating grain characteristics and the response to nitrogen levels. BMC Plant Biol 20:1–21
Jagadhesan B, Sathee L, Meena HS, Jha SK, Chinnusamy V, Kumar A et al. (2020) Genome wide analysis of NLP transcription factors reveals their role in nitrogen stress tolerance of rice. Sci Rep 10:1–16
Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP, Bartel B (2006) MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57: 19-53Kim VN (2005) MicroRNA biogenesis: coordinated cropping and dicing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:376–385
Kozomara A, Birgaoanu M, Griffiths-Jones S (2019) miRBase: from microRNA sequences to function. Nucleic Acids Res 47:155–162
Kulcheski FR, Côrrea R, Gomes IA, de Lima JC, Margis R (2015) NPK macronutrients and microRNA homeostasis. Front Plant Sci 6:451
Kumar A, Kumar S, Kumar U, Suravajhala P, Gajula MP (2016) Functional and structural insights into novel DREB1A transcription factors in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): A molecular modeling approach. Comput Biol Chem 64:217–226
Kumar A, Chauhan A, Sharma M, Kompelli SK, Gahlaut V, Ijaq J et al. (2017a) Genome-wide mining, characterization and development of miRNA-SSRs in Arabidopsis thaliana. bioRxiv 203851
Kumar A, Pandeya A, Malik G, Hima KP, Anil KS, Sharma M et al. (2017b) A web-resource for nutrient use efficiency related Genes, QTLs, and microRNA in important cereals and model plants. bioRxiv 222992
Kumar A, Sharma M, Kumar S, Tyagi P, Wani SH, Gajula MP et al. (2018a) Functional and structural insights into candidate genes associated with nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Int J Biol Macromol 118:76–91
Kumar A, Batra R, Gahlaut V, Gautam T, Kumar S, Sharma M et al. (2018b) Genome-wide identification and characterization of gene family for RWP-RK transcription factors in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLoS One 13:e0208409
Kumar M, Singh B (2019) Precision nutrient management in wheat using nutrient expert. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 8(2):2265–2269
Kumar S, Kumar M, Mir RR, Kumar R, Kumar S. (2021) Advances in molecular markers and their use in genetic improvement of wheat. In Physiological, molecular, and genetic perspectives of wheat improvement. Springer Cham 139–174
Ladha JK, Tirol-Padre A, Reddy CK, Cassman KG, Verma S, Powlson DS et al. (2016) Global nitrogen budgets in cereals: A 50-year assessment for maize, rice and wheat production systems. Sci Rep 6:1–9
Lawson MJ, Zhang L (2006) Distinct patterns of SSR distribution in the Arabidopsis thaliana and rice genomes. Genome Biol 7(1):11
Li C, Yu X, Bai L, He C, Li Y (2016) Responses of miRNAs and their target genes to nitrogen-or phosphorus-deficiency in grafted cucumber seedlings. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 57:97–112
Liang G, He H, Yu D (2012) Identification of nitrogen starvation-responsive microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One 7:e48951
Liu X, Wang H, Zhou J, Hu F, Zhu D, Chen Z et al. (2016) Effect of N fertilization pattern on rice yield, N use efficiency and fertilizer–N fate in the Yangtze River Basin, China. PLoS One 11:e0166002
Longnecker N, Kirby EJM, Robson A (1993) Leaf emergence, tiller growth, and apical development of nitrogen‐deficient spring wheat. Crop Sci 33:154–160
Maniatis T, Jeffrey A, Van dSH (1975) Chain length determination of small double-and single-stranded DNA molecules by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Biochemistry 14:3787–3794
Marschner H, Kirkby EA, Cakmak I (1996) Effect of mineral nutritional status on shoot-root partitioning of photoassimilates and cycling of mineral nutrients. J Exp Bot 47:1255–1263
Mathpal P, Kumar U, Kumar A, Kumar S, Malik S, Kumar N et al. (2018) Identification, expression analysis, and molecular modeling of Iron-deficiency-specific clone 3 (Ids3)-like gene in hexaploid wheat. 3 Biotech 8:1–11
Mehta KM, Puntamkar SS, Kalamkar VG (1963) Study on uptake of nutrients by wheat as influenced by nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 9:29–34
Mehta G, Muthusamy SK, Singh GP, Sharma P (2021) Identification and development of novel salt-responsive candidate gene based SSRs (cg-SSRs) and MIR gene based SSRs (mir-SSRs) in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). Sci Rep 11:1–15
Min X, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Wei X, Liu Z, Wang Y et al. (2017) Genome-wide development of microRNA-based SSR markers in Medicago truncatula with their transferability analysis and utilization in related legume species. Int J Mol Sci 18:2440
Mir RR, Hiremath PJ, Riera-Lizarazu O, Varshney RK (2013) Evolving molecular marker technologies in plants: from RFLPs to GBS. Diagnostics in Plant Breeding 2013. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 229–247
Mir RR, Varshney RK (2012) Future prospects of molecular markers in plants. In: Henry RobertJ (eds.) Molecular Markers in Plants. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, p 169–190. ISBN 9781118473023
Moll RH, Kamprath EJ, Jackson WA (1982) Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization 1. Agronomy 74:562–564
Mondal TK, Ganie SA (2014) Identification and characterization of salt responsive miRNA-SSR markers in rice (Oryza sativa). Gene 535:204–209
Nagy S, Poczai P, Cernak I, Gorgi A, Hegedus G, Taller J (2012) PICcalc: An online programme to calculate polymorphic information content for molecular genetic studies. Bioche. Nguyen G, Rothstein S, Spangenberg G, Kant S (2015) Role of microRNAs involved in plant response to nitrogen and phosphorous limiting conditions. Front Plant Sci 6:629
Olsen SR (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Dep Agric 939
Paul S, Datta SK, Datta K (2015) miRNA regulation of nutrient homeostasis in plants. Front Plant Sci 6:232
Peakall ROD, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295
Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet JP (2006) DARwin software http://darwin.cirad.fr/
Plett DC, Holtham LR, Okamoto M, Garnett TP (2018) Nitrate uptake and its regulation in relation to improving nitrogen use efficiency in cereals. Semin Cell Dev Biol 74:97–104.
Poli Y, Nallamothu V, Balakrishnan D, Ramesh P, Desiraju S, Mangrauthia SK et al. (2018) Increased catalase activity and maintenance of photosystem II distinguishes high-yield mutants from low-yield mutants of rice var. Nagina22 under low-phosphorus stress. Front Plant Sci 9:1543
Rouached H, Arpat AB, Poirier Y (2010) Regulation of phosphate starvation responses in plants: signaling players and cross-talks. Mol plant 3:288–299
Shen Z, Zhang K, Ma L, Duan J, Ao Y (2017) Analysis of the genetic relationships and diversity among 11 populations of Xanthoceras sorbifolia using phenotypic and microsatellite marker data. Electron J Biotechnol 26:33–39
Shewry PR, Hey SJ (2015) The contribution of wheat to human diet and health. Food Energy Secur 4:178–202
Sihag P, Sagwal V, Kumar A, Balyan P, Mir RR, Dhankher OP et al. (2021) Discovery of miRNAs and development of heat-responsive miRNA-SSR markers for characterization of wheat germplasm for terminal heat tolerance breeding. Front. Genet. 12:699420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.699420
Singh AK, Chaurasia S, Kumar S, Singh R, Kumari J, Yadav MC et al. (2018) Identification, analysis and development of salt responsive candidate gene based SSR markers in wheat. BMC Plant Biol 18:1–15
Subbiah BV, Asija GL (1956) A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci 25:259–60
Sunkar R, Li YF, Jagadeeswaran G (2012) Functions of microRNAs in plant stress responses. Trends Plant Sci 17:196–203
Tyagi S, Sharma S, Ganie SA, Tahir M, Mir RR, Pandey R (2019) Plant microRNAs: Biogenesis, gene silencing, web-based analysis tools and their use as molecular markers. 3 Biotech 9(11):413
Tyagi S, Kumar A, Gautam T, Pandey R, Rustgi S, Mir RR (2021) Development and use of miRNA-derived SSR markers for the study of genetic diversity, population structure, and characterization of genotypes for breeding heat tolerant wheat varieties. PLoS One 16(2):e0231063
Vance CP (2010) Quantitative trait loci, epigenetics, sugars, and microRNAs: quaternaries in phosphate acquisition and use. Plant Physiol 154:582–588
Venske E, Dos Santos RS, Busanello C, Gustafson P, de Oliveira AC (2019) Bread wheat: a role model for plant domestication and breeding. Hereditas 156:1–11
Vinod KK, Heuer S (2012) Approaches towards nitrogen- and phosphorus-efficient rice. AoB Plants 2012:pls028. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/pls028
Wang M, Guo W, Li J, Pan X, Pan L, Zhao J et al. (2021) The miR528-AO module confers enhanced salt tolerance in rice by modulating the ascorbic acid and abscisic acid metabolism and ROS scavenging. J Agric Food Chem 69(31):8634–8648
Xu HX, Weng XY, Yang Y (2007) Effect of phosphorus deficiency on the photosynthetic characteristics of rice plants. Russ J Plant Physiol 54:741–748
Xu Z, Zhong S, Li X, Li W, Rothstein SJ, Zhang S et al. (2011) Genome-wide identification of microRNAs in response to low nitrate availability in maize leaves and roots. PloS One 6:e28009
You FM, Huo N, Gu YQ, Luo MC, Ma Y, Hane D et al. (2008) BatchPrimer3: a high throughput web application for PCR and sequencing primer design. BMC Bioinforma 9:1–13
Zhang M, An P, Li H, Wang X, Zhou J, Dong P et al. (2019) The miRNA-mediated post-transcriptional regulation of maize in response to high temperature. Int J Mol Sci 20(7):1754
Zeng H, Wang G, Hu X, Wang H, Du L, Zhu Y (2014) Role of microRNAs in plant responses to nutrient stress. Plant Soil 374:1005–1021
Zhao X, Liu X, Guo C, Gu J, Xiao K (2013) Identification and characterization of microRNAs from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under phosphorus deprivation. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 22:113–123
Zuluaga DL, Sonnante G (2019) The use of nitrogen and its regulation in cereals: Structural genes, transcription factors, and the role of miRNAs. Plants 8:294
Acknowledgements
The authors are highly grateful to the Head, Department of Molecular Biology, Biotechnology & Bioinformatics, and Director of Research, CCS Haryana Agricultural University for providing financial support and all necessary facilities (Laboratory and Field) during the course of this work. The authors (PS and YS) acknowledge the financial support from the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India for Senior Research Fellow (SRF) award. UK and OPD also acknowledge to Ministry of Education for providing financial support for research and collaboration under SPARC project (No: SPARC/2018-2019/P854/SL).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
UK designed the experiments and obtained funding for this research. VS and PS conducted the experiments. VS, AK, YS, SM, PK, and PB performed data analysis. VS and UK drafted the manuscript. RM and OPD revised the manuscript. All authors agreed to the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors stated that this study was conducted in the absence of a commercial or financial relationship that could be considered a potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Associate editor Yuan-Ming Zhang
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sagwal, V., Sihag, P., Singh, Y. et al. Development and characterization of nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiency responsive genic and miRNA derived SSR markers in wheat. Heredity 128, 391–401 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-022-00506-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-022-00506-4
This article is cited by
-
Development of miRNA-SSR and target-SSR markers from yield-associate genes and their applicability in the assessment of genetic diversity and association mapping in rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Molecular Breeding (2024)
-
Physiological traits and expression profile of genes associated with nitrogen and phosphorous use efficiency in wheat
Molecular Biology Reports (2023)
-
MicroRNAs modulating nutrient homeostasis: a sustainable approach for developing biofortified crops
Protoplasma (2023)
-
The current status of breeding research in Lolium genus
Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology (2023)
-
Multi-faceted approaches for breeding nutrient-dense, disease-resistant, and climate-resilient crop varieties for food and nutritional security
Heredity (2022)