Severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) is a therapy-resistant respiratory condition with poor clinical control. Treatment efficacy and patient compliance of current therapies remain unsatisfactory. Here, inspired by the remarkable success of chimeric antigen receptor-based cellular adoptive immunotherapies demonstrated for the treatment of a variety of malignant tumors, we engineered a cytokine-anchored chimeric antigen receptor T (CCAR-T) cell system using a chimeric IL-5-CD28-CD3ζ receptor to trigger T-cell-mediated killing of eosinophils that are elevated during severe asthma attacks. IL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells exhibited selective and effective killing capacity in vitro and restricted eosinophil differentiation with apparent protection against allergic airway inflammation in two mouse models of asthma. Notably, a single dose of IL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells resulted in persistent protection against asthma-related conditions over three months, significantly exceeding the typical therapeutic window of current mAb-based treatments in the clinics. This study presents a cell-based treatment strategy for SEA and could set the stage for a new era of precision therapies against a variety of intractable allergic diseases in the future.
Over 339 million people suffer from asthma worldwide1 and patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) are at high risk of mortality and low quality of life2,3,4. SEA, characterized by eosinophilic inflammation, is a major phenotype of refractory asthma with poor clinical control4. Eosinophils have a prominent role in SEA pathogenesis, causing airway epithelial damage and bronchial remodeling5. Eosinophilia is closely related to higher exacerbation frequency and worse control, leading to decreased lung function6,7. Thus, strategies capable of inactivating or depleting eosinophils offer attractive therapies for SEA8,9.
Currently, asthma symptoms control mainly relies on the daily administration of the inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with β2 receptor agonists10, which can cause intolerable adverse reactions, including osteoporosis and hypertension11. For SEA patients, biological agents targeting the interleukin-5 (IL-5)/IL-5 receptor α (IL-5Rα) axis interfere with the pathologic functions of eosinophils and show promising therapeutic effects12. The human IL-5Rα, showing specific binding for IL-5, is expressed on mature eosinophils, basophils, and their progenitors13,14. When exposed to allergens, epithelial-derived cytokine IL-33 upregulates the IL-5Rα expression on eosinophil progenitors15. Then the concomitant expression of IL-5 and IL-5Rα mediates the growth and terminal differentiation of eosinophil progenitors, which contributes to the subsequent development of blood and tissue eosinophilia in eosinophilic asthma patients with type 2-high inflammation16,17. Anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies, such as mepolizumab and reslizumab, have been approved for second-line treatment of SEA in the clinics by decreasing the level of eosinophils in the blood/sputum through neutralization of IL-5, and inhibition of eosinophil differentiation and activation to eventually reduce the exacerbation frequency in asthma patients18,19,20. Yet, their effects on the reduction of airway eosinophils are restricted21,22. Benralizumab, an mAb against the IL-5Rα, can directly eliminate eosinophils through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity13. Although benralizumab showed better efficacy than mepolizumab or reslizumab in improving pulmonary functions of SEA patients23, population-level response rates remain low and the reduction of annual exacerbation rates remains limited24,25. Moreover, poor bioavailability of mAb drugs results in a need for repeated administration over long timespans, which severely compromises patient compliance.
Recently, cellular adoptive immunotherapies based on CD19-specific CAR-T cells have shown remarkable efficacy in treating B cell malignancies26,27,28. The chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) is a fusion protein composed of an extracellular target-specific scFv-moiety and an intracellular T-cell receptor domain typically consisting of CD28 and CD3ζ, allowing for antigen-specific activation of T-cell killing in a strict scFv-dependent manner29,30. Using this empiric design principle, similar CAR-T strategies have been extensively tested for the treatment of other cancers such as neuroblastoma31,32, hepatocellular carcinoma33,34,35, as well as other diseases in the fields of autoimmune diseases36,37,38, cardiovascular diseases39 and senescence-associated pathologies40. However, neither of the latter approaches could repeat or emulate the treatment efficacy of the inaugural anti-CD19 system, which forms the basis of all clinically approved CAR-T products that have hitherto arrived onto the market30,41,42,43. In fact, a typical adverse effect of classical CAR-T therapies is the development of severe clinical anaphylaxis44,45. A few reports indicate that xenogenetically-derived scFv domains could largely contribute to such immunogenicity-related reactions43,46,47,48, which restricts the application of CAR-T cell therapy in allergic patients.
In this work, we developed an scFv-independent, cytokine-anchored chimeric antigen receptor (CCAR) configuration that uses IL-5 as the extracellular target-binding domain. When engineered into primary T-cells, IL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells specifically target IL-5Rα-expressing eosinophils and eosinophil progenitor cells49,50. IL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells effectively restricted eosinophil differentiation with obvious protection against allergic airway inflammation in murine asthma models.
Engineering of eosinophil-targeting CCAR-T cells
Human eosinophils and eosinophil progenitor cells highly express IL-5Rα (Supplementary Fig. S1)49,50, a feature that is exploited by the current benralizumab therapy51. To engineer eosinophil-targeting hIL-5Rα-specific T cells, we designed two different CAR configurations (Fig. 1a, c). The first design follows the conventional CAR blueprint, comprising an extracellular scFv-moiety derived from benralizumab fused to an intracellular TCR-derived CD28-CD3ζ signaling domain (anti-hIL-5Rα CAR-T; Fig. 1a). Our second design uses the human IL-5 (hIL-5) as the CAR extracellular domain instead of scFv (hIL-5-anchored CCAR; Fig. 1c). Both CAR-T variants, generated through retroviral transduction of murine primary T cells (Supplementary Fig. S2a), showed specific elimination of hIL-5Rα+ cells in vitro (Fig. 1b, d). C-C motif chemokine receptor 3 (CCR3) is another widely studied surface marker expressed by mature eosinophils and Th2 subsets (Supplementary Fig. S1)52. To engineer CCR3-specific CCAR-T cells, we designed CCL11-anchored and CCL24-anchored CCAR-T cells using human CCL11 and CCL24 as the CCR3-binding domains, respectively (Fig. 1e, g). As expected, both hCCL11-anchored and hCCL24-anchored CCAR-T cells displayed cytotoxicity against stable hCCR3-expressing target cells (Fig. 1f, h).
Next, we transduced primary T cells from healthy human donors with both lentiviral vectors (Supplementary Fig. S2b). The corresponding anti-hIL-5Rα CAR-T and hIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells showed a similar proliferative capacity to native un-transduced T-cells (UTD-T cells) (Supplementary Fig. S3), and exhibited specific elimination of hIL-5Rα+ target cells as well (Fig. 1i). Furthermore, anti-hIL-5Rα CAR-T and hIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells showed comparable IFN-γ secretion capacity after coculture with hIL-5Rα+ target cells for 24 h (Fig. 1j, k).
To characterize the binding affinity of hIL-5-anchored CCAR and anti-hIL-5Rα CAR to the hIL-5Rα target, we used the adhesion frequency assay as previously reported53,54 (Fig. 1l). Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between these two CAR-T variants in terms of in-situ binding kinetics (Fig. 1m), i.e., effective affinity (AcKa) (Fig. 1n) and effective on-rate (AcKon) (Fig. 1o). However, the off-rate (Koff) of the hIL-5-anchored CCAR was slightly lower than that of the anti-hIL-5Rα CAR (Fig. 1p).
We then transferred anti-mIL-5Rα CAR-T cells into the allergic airway inflammation model (Supplementary Fig. S4b). Anti-mIL-5Rα CAR-T cells, which showed specific elimination of mIL-5Rα+ cells in vitro (Supplementary Fig. S4a), could not significantly reduce eosinophil levels in vivo (Supplementary Fig. S4c, d). Meanwhile, we compared the mCCL11-anchored, mCCL24-anchored, and mIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells in vivo (Supplementary Fig. S5a). Interestingly, neither the mCCL11-anchored nor the mCCL24-anchored CCAR-T cells reduced eosinophil levels, while mIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells showed promising results (Supplementary Fig. S5b, c). Thus, we selected the IL-5-anchored CCAR-T strategy for further studies.
Functional assessment of hIL-5-anchored CCAR-cells in NSG mice
Next, we tested the function of hIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells in vivo. First, we detected the CD69 expression on Jurkat cells to assess the CCAR-induced T cell activation. The hIL-5-anchored CCAR-Jurkat cells, which can be activated by target cell in vitro (Supplementary Fig. S6), were significantly activated by hIL-5Rα+ target cells as well after intraperitoneal injection of both hIL-5Rα+ U2OS cells and hIL-5-anchored CCAR-Jurkat cells in NOD/ShiLtJGpt-Prkdcem26Cd52Il2rgem26Cd22/Gpt (NCG) mice (Fig. 2a). Then, we tested the in vivo efficacy of hIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells against target cells through bioluminescence imaging. Compared to UTD-T cells, both murine primary hIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells (Fig. 2b, c) and human primary CCAR-T cells (Fig. 2d, e) dramatically eliminated hIL-5Rα+ U2OS cells.
Targeting specificity of IL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells
To assess the function of IL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells in the murine asthma models, we designed murine variants based on mIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells or CCAR-Jurkat cells specific for murine IL-5Rα (mIL-5Rα). The mIL-5-anchored CCAR-Jurkat cells were activated by target cells expressing mIL-5Rα after 24 h of coculture (Fig. 3a), whereas hIL-5-anchored CCAR-Jurkat cells showed no response to mIL-5Rα+ target cells, confirming target specificity of the CCAR (Fig. 3b). Next, we transduced primary murine T cells with the mIL-5-anchored CCAR retrovirus (mIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells) for cytotoxic activity assay. Similarly, mIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells showed significant cytotoxicity against mIL-5Rα+ target cells (Fig. 3c). Further, we performed a cell apoptosis assay using mouse primary mIL-5Rα+ and mIL-5Rα− cells as target cells. In contrast to the UTD-T cells, mIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells remarkably reduced the proportion of mIL-5Rα+ cells (Fig. 3d) and displayed specific cytolysis (Fig. 3e). As the differentiation of eosinophils plays a crucial role in airway eosinophilia during SEA16, mIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells were also applied on a bone marrow-derived eosinophil (BMDE) differentiation assay (Fig. 3f). We observed that administration of mIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells could block eosinophil differentiation both on the cell proportion (Fig. 3g) and cell count level (Fig. 3h). Together, these results suggest that the mIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells are capable of selectively and effectively eliminating eosinophils.
Protective effect of CCAR-T cells against allergic eosinophilic inflammation
Next, we assessed the effect of CCAR-T cells in allergic airway inflammation mouse models55,56,57. In an acute asthmatic inflammation model, 3 × 106 mIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells were intravenously injected into recipient mice one week before administration of the extract of house dust mite (HDM) (Fig. 4a), and eosinophils were analyzed by flow cytometry using cell surface staining (Supplementary Fig. S7). Indeed, administration of mIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells strikingly reduced both the proportion and the absolute number of eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) that are typically elevated during HDM-stimulated conditions (Fig. 4b–d). In addition, CCAR-T cells brought a significant decrease in eosinophil levels in lung tissue of HDM-treated mice (Fig. 4e), as well as in the peripheral blood (Fig. 4f, g) and bone marrow (Fig. 4h). Collectively, these data demonstrate that the mIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells can efficiently target and eliminate eosinophils in the HDM-induced allergic airway inflammation model.
We next investigated the impact of mIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells on the level of airway inflammation. IL-5 is a type 2 cytokine that promotes differentiation and activation of eosinophils and is, therefore, an essential biomarker for asthma58,59. We discovered that mIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells resulted in a significant decrease in IL-5 level in BALF (Fig. 4i). Administration of CCAR-T cells also reduced the total number of inflammatory cells in BALF (Fig. 4j), indicating the remission of inflammatory infiltration in the airway. We further assessed the inflammation level in hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) stained pulmonary sections by semi-quantification. The notable differences in inflammatory scores following CCAR-T cells administration confirmed that mIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells protect against airway inflammation (Fig. 4k, l).
Long-term efficacy of CCAR-T cells
To evaluate the duration of efficacy of the current IL-5-anchored CCAR-T strategy, we tested the effect of mIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells in the ovalbumin (OVA)-containing aerosols inhalation induced airway inflammation model. In the one-month model (Fig. 5a), we observed mIL-5-anchored CCAR-T-dependent reduction in the eosinophil levels in BALF (Fig. 5b, c), lung tissue (Supplementary Fig. S8a), and peripheral blood (Supplementary Fig. S8b), and decreased IL-5 levels in BALF (Fig. 5d) as well as alleviated inflammation scores in lungs (Fig. 5e, f).
Moreover, the IL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells maintained effective control of asthma-related conditions for up to three months (Fig. 5g–l; Supplementary Fig. S9), including the eosinophil levels in BALF (Fig. 5h, i), peripheral blood (Supplementary Fig. S9a) and bone marrow (Supplementary Fig. S9b), IL-5 levels in BALF (Fig. 5j) as well as the inflammatory infiltration in the airway (Fig. 5k, l). These findings imply that the CCAR-T concept might set a new standard for long-term inflammation protection for asthmatic patients.
Additionally, no differences in the proportion of Th1 cells, Th2 cells, or Treg cells could be observed following CCAR-T transfer, excluding putative effects of CCAR-T cells on endogenous T cell responses (Supplementary Fig. S10). Also, no significant impact on systemic inflammatory biomarkers, serum IL-6 and IFN-γ, was observed (Supplementary Fig. S11).
Eosinophilic inflammation plays a prominent role in SEA. According to reports60,61,62, eosinophil depletion does not increase the risk of helminth infection or affect the vaccine responses. Although current management or add-on therapies for SEA can control the symptoms to a certain extent, inflammation relief is short-lasting, and asthma exacerbation continues. To address these concerns, we developed a cellular adoptive immunotherapy using design principles adopted from chimeric antigen receptor-T cells29,30 and applied it to allergic asthma. To avoid anaphylaxis reactions typically observed in scFv-dependent CAR-T therapies for cancer, we employed a ligand-anchored CAR design that allows cytokines to trigger target-specific T-cell killing. From a cell engineering perspective, the design of scFv-independent CARs is also highly advantageous in terms of time- and resource-efficiency, as the costly large-scale screening for antibody moieties can be omitted.
In this study, we have engineered the IL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells and verified their killing capacity in vitro and in mice. We showed that the IL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells exhibited efficacious and persistent control of eosinophilic asthma conditions in both the HDM and OVA-stimulated acute inflammatory asthma models. Furthermore, IL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells maintained a constant effect on eosinophil reduction, IL-5 reduction, and prevention of airway inflammation over three months, exceeding the typical active therapeutic window of single mAb-injections of 4 weeks11.
During traditional CAR-T treatment, the monoclonal antibodies-derived scFvs could induce immune responses due to their high immunogenicity43. In this case, anti-mIL-5Rα CAR carrying scFvs might elicit anti-CAR responses, especially in the hypersensitive immune environment of allergen-induced asthma models involved in this study, which might contribute to the treatment failure of anti-mIL-5Rα CAR-T cells in vivo.
When exposed to allergens, eosinophil progenitors rapidly differentiate into a large number of mature eosinophils. IL-5Rα is highly expressed on the surface of both eosinophil progenitors and mature eosinophils, while CCR3 is mainly expressed on mature eosinophils63. This might explain why CCAR-T cells targeting CCR3 failed to reduce eosinophils in vivo.
As the chronicity and the need for long-term or even life-long therapy are severe challenges during the treatment of eosinophilic diseases64, IL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells therapy is expected to solve these problems. Thus, the cytokine-anchored CCAR-T strategy not only showed unprecedented medical potential in SEA therapy but might also kick off a new era of cell-based precision medicine for the treatment of other eosinophilic diseases, such as chronic rhinosinusitis, eosinophilic esophagitis, and even chronic eosinophilic leukemia64.
Materials and methods
To detect the activation of the Jurkat cell line, we used anti-human CD69 PE (BioLegend). To analyze the phenotype of mouse eosinophils in BALF or lung tissues, we used anti-mouse CD45 PE-CY7 (BioLegend), anti-mouse SiglecF PE (BD), anti-mouse F4/80 APC-CY7 (BioLegend), anti-mouse CD11b FITC (BioLegend) and anti-mouse CD11c APC (BioLegend). To detect mIL-5Rα positive cells, we used anti-mouse CD125 AF488 (BD). To detect mIL-5-anchored CCAR and hIL-5-anchored CCAR, we used anti-mouse/human IL-5 PE (BioLegend) or anti-HA.11 Epitope Tag AF647 (BioLegend). To detect anti-hIL-5Rα CAR, hCCL11-anchored CCAR, and hCCL24-anchored CCAR, we used anti-HA.11 Epitope Tag AF647 (BioLegend).
Animals and cell lines
Wild-type BALB/c mice were provided by the Animal Center of Slaccas (Shanghai, China). NCG (NOD/ShiLtJGpt-Prkdcem26Cd52Il2rgem26Cd22/Gpt) mice were provided by GemPharmatech Co., Ltd (Nanjing, China). All mouse experiments were performed under the stipulations approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Studies of Zhejiang University (ZJU20210182). U2OS cells, Plat-E cells, and HEK293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (HyClone) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco) and 100 IU /mL penicillin and streptomycin (10 mg/mL, Gibco). Jurkat cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (HyClone) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco) and 100 IU/mL penicillin and streptomycin (10 mg/mL, Gibco).
Isolation, expansion, and genetic modification of primary mouse T cells
Splenocytes were harvested from the BALB/c mice. Primary CD3+ T cells, which included CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells, were purified from the splenocytes using the mouse CD3 T cell isolation kit (BioLegend) and were cultured at 106/mL in RPMI-1640 medium (HyClone) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco), HEPES (10 mM, Solarbio), sodium pyruvate (1 mM, GENOM), 1× non-essential amino acids (Gibco), β-mercaptoethanol (50 μM, Sigma) and 100 IU/mL penicillin and streptomycin (10 mg/mL, Gibco). T cells were stimulated under the condition of anti-mouse CD3 antibody (1 μg/mL, BioLegend) and anti-mouse CD28 antibody (2 μg/mL, BioLegend). 48 h after T cells stimulation, T cells were transduced with retroviral supernatants from the Plat-E cell line in the presence of polybrene (6 μg/mL, Yeasen) by centrifugal infection. T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry 2 days after transduction and were used for further experiments.
Isolation, expansion, and genetic modification of human T cells
Peripheral blood was obtained from the healthy donors. Blood sampling was performed following the required ethical procedures. Lymphocytes were isolated by density gradient centrifugation following the manual of the Human Lymphocyte Separation Medium (DAKEWE). Human T cells were purified using the human CD3 T cell isolation kit (BioLegend), stimulated with CD3/CD28 T cell Activator Dynabeads (Gibco) and cultured at 106/mL in X-VIVO 15 Serum-free Hematopoietic Cell Medium (Lonza), supplemented with 5 ng/mL human IL-7 (PeproTech) and 5 ng/mL human IL-15 (PeproTech)40,65, with slight modification. 48 h after T cell stimulation, T cells were transduced with lentiviral supernatants from 293 T cell line in the presence of polybrene (6 μg/mL, Yeasen) by centrifugal infection. T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry 4 days after transduction and were used for further experiments. All human subjects were informed and signed informed consent prior to inclusion in the study and all human cell isolation and related experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee for Human Studies of Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine (2019 NO.388).
Cytotoxic activity assay
The cytotoxicity of CCAR-T cells, CAR-T cells, or UTD-T cells was determined by the luciferase-based assay as described previously40,65. In detail, 1 × 104 target cells, stably expressing firefly luciferase through retrovirus infection, were cocultured with killing cells at the indicated T/target ratios in white 96-well plates (Costar) for indicated incubation time. Target cells alone were plated at the same cell density for determining the maximal luciferase expression (relative light units, RLU). The culture medium was discarded carefully and 15 μg D-luciferin (GoldBio) in 100 μL PBS was added to each well after coculture. Emitted light was detected by the luminescence plate reader (SynergyMx M5, Molecular Devices) and was converted into lysis (%) according to the previous report40 to characterize the cytotoxicity.
Adhesion frequency assay
The preparation of the red blood cells (RBCs) and the experimental procedure of adhesion frequency assay have been described in detail previously53,54. Briefly, for the preparation of the hIL-5Rα-coated RBCs, the human IL-5Rα (hIL-5Rα) extracellular domain linked with AviTag was expressed, purified, and biotinylated. The biotinylated hIL-5Rα was linked to streptavidin-coated RBCs (SA-RBCs) to produce hIL-5Rα-coated RBCs which were then used for the adhesion frequency assay. For the adhesion frequency assay, it was used for measuring the in-situ binding kinetics of the hIL-5Rα and the anti-hIL-5Rα CAR/CCAR. In brief, this assay utilized micromanipulation to precisely operate the contact and retraction between the hIL-5Rα-coated RBCs and the anti-hIL-5Rα CAR/CCAR Jurkat cells.
The binding frequency Pa was acquired with definite contact area Ac and a series of preset contact time tc through 50 contact-retraction cycles. And the in-situ effective binding affinity AcKa and the off-rate koff were then calculated by the probabilistic kinetic model:
Where mr and mhIL-5Rα are respective CAR/CCAR and hIL-5Rα molecular densities, which are determined by standard calibration beads on flow cytometry. In-situ effective on-rate Ackon was then calculated by: Ackon = AcKa × koff.
Xenograft model in NCG mice
For the in vivo CCAR-induced Jurkat cell activation assay, the NCG mice were injected intraperitoneally with 1 × 107 hIL-5Rα+ U2OS cells and 1 × 107 hIL-5-anchored CCAR-Jurkat cells at 0 h. Mice were sacrificed at 3 h or 6 h, and the CCAR-Jurkat cells were harvested from intraperitoneal lavage fluids and analyzed by flow cytometry.
For the in vivo CCAR-induced T cell cytotoxicity assay, the NCG mice were injected intraperitoneally with 3 × 105 hIL-5Rα+ U2OS cells expressing firefly luciferase and 1 × 106 murine primary hIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells or human primary hIL-5-anchored CCAR-T cells at day 0. 24 h later, the bioluminescence imaging of the mice was performed 10 min after intraperitoneal injection of 100 μL D-luciferin (30 mg/mL, GoldBio) on an IVIS Spectrum imaging system (Caliper) and the average radiance of hIL-5Rα+ U2OS cells was measured through the Living Image software (Caliper).
Murine bone marrow-derived eosinophils (BMDE) differentiation in vitro
The isolation and culture of BMDE were performed as described previously66,67, with slight modification. Bone marrow cells were harvested from the tibias and femurs of BALB/c mice. The cells were cultured at 106/mL in IMDM medium (Invitrogen) containing FBS (20%, Gibco), L-glutamine (2 mM), sodium pyruvate (1 mM, GENOM), 1× non-essential amino acids (Gibco), β-mercaptoethanol (50 μM, Sigma) and penicillin (100 IU/mL) and streptomycin (10 mg/mL, Gibco). MSCF (100 ng/mL, PeproTech) and mFLT3 ligand (100 ng/mL, PeproTech) were supplemented during the first 4 days. On day 4, the cells were washed and reseeded in the fresh IMDM medium supplemented with mIL-5 (10 ng/mL, Minneapolis) for the next 4 days. On day 8, the cells were harvested and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Mouse model of eosinophilic asthma
OVA-induced asthma model
BALB/c mice were sensitized with 200 μL of 80 μg OVA (Sigma-Aldrich) emulsified in the aluminum adjuvant (Thermo Scientific) through intraperitoneal injection on day 0 and day 14, and control mice were administered with 200 μL saline (NS). On days 25-27, sensitized mice were challenged with 1.5% OVA in saline through aerosol administration for 40 min every time by an ultrasonic atomizer (Devilbiss). 24 h after the final challenge, mice were sacrificed for analysis.
HDM-induced asthma model
BALB/c mice received HDM (100 μg, D. pteronyssinus) in 50 μL saline through airway drip on day 0, day 7, and day 14, as described previously56,68. Control mice received 50 μL saline (NS) in the same way. Then mice were sacrificed 72 h after the final airway drip for analysis.
Detection of the inflammatory factors
The concentration of IL-5 in BALF supernatants was measured by mouse IL-5 enhanced sensitivity cytometric bead array assay (Enhanced CBA, BD), serum IL-6 by mouse IL-6 Enhanced CBA (BD), serum IFN-γ by mouse IFN-γ Enhanced CBA (BD), serum IL-13 by mouse IL-13 Enhanced CBA (BD) and serum IL-4 by mouse IL-4 Enhanced CBA (BD) following the manufacturer’s manual. The human IFN-γ was measured by the human IFN-γ ELISA kit (AbClonal).
Perivascular inflammation score
The pulmonary sections were embedded in paraffin and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) after fixation. The score of the perivascular inflammation was determined by the degree of inflammatory cell infiltration and was assessed as 0–3 on a subjective scale, as described previously69,70, with slight modification. Briefly, 0 means no or occasional inflammatory cells distributed in the perivascular space; 1 means 1 layer of inflammatory cells surrounded in the perivascular space; 2 for 2–5 layers of inflammatory cells; 3 for more than 5 layers of inflammatory cells.
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software 8.0. Comparisons in each experiment were described in the figure legends. All representative data were replicated in at least three independent experiments.
The main data supporting the results in this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Figures. The data generated and analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 390, 1211–1259 (2017).
Lee, P., Abisheganaden, J., Chee, C. B. & Wang, Y. T. A new asthma severity index: a predictor of near-fatal asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 18, 272–278 (2001).
Chung, K. F. et al. International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 43, 343–373 (2014).
Buhl, R. et al. Severe eosinophilic asthma: A roadmap to consensus. Eur. Respir. J. 49, 1700634 (2017).
Theiler, A. et al. Butyrate ameliorates allergic airway inflammation by limiting eosinophil trafficking and survival. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 144, 764–776 (2019).
Price, D. et al. Predicting frequent asthma exacerbations using blood eosinophil count and other patient data routinely available in clinical practice. J. Asthma Allergy 9, 1–12 (2016).
Belda, J. et al. Predictors of loss of asthma control induced by corticosteroid withdrawal. Can. Respir. J. 13, 129–133 (2006).
Harrison, T. W. et al. Onset of effect and impact on health-related quality of life, exacerbation rate, lung function, and nasal polyposis symptoms for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab (ANDHI): a randomised, controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 9, 260–274 (2021).
Nair, P. et al. Mepolizumab for prednisone-dependent asthma with sputum eosinophilia. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 985–993 (2009).
Global Asthma Report 2018. (Auckland, New Zealand: Global Asthma Network, 2018).
Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. (Global Initiative for Asthma, 2020).
Matucci, A., Maggi, E. & Vultaggio, A. Eosinophils, the IL-5/IL-5Ralpha axis, and the biologic effects of benralizumab in severe asthma. Respir. Med. 160, 105819 (2019).
Kolbeck, R. et al. MEDI-563, a humanized anti-IL-5 receptor alpha mAb with enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity function. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 125, 1344–1353.e2 (2010).
Takatsu, K., Takaki, S. & Hitoshi, Y. Interleukin-5 and its receptor system: implications in the immune system and inflammation. Adv. Immunol. 57, 145–190 (1994).
Fulkerson, P. C. & Rothenberg, M. E. Eosinophil development, disease involvement, and therapeutic suppression. Adv. Immunol. 138, 1–34 (2018).
Salter, B. M. & Sehmi, R. Hematopoietic processes in eosinophilic asthma. Chest 152, 410–416 (2017).
Salter, B. M., Ju, X. & Sehmi, R. Eosinophil lineage-committed progenitors as a therapeutic target for asthma. Cells 10, 412 (2021).
Ortega, H. G. et al. Severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab stratified by baseline eosinophil thresholds: a secondary analysis of the DREAM and MENSA studies. Lancet Respir. Med. 4, 549–556 (2016).
Castro, M. et al. Reslizumab for inadequately controlled asthma with elevated blood eosinophil counts: Results from two multicentre, parallel, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet Respir. Med. 3, 355–366 (2015).
Ray, A., Raundhal, M., Oriss, T. B., Ray, P. & Wenzel, S. E. Current concepts of severe asthma. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 2394–2403 (2016).
Pavord, I. D. et al. Mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma (DREAM): A multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 380, 651–659 (2012).
Castro, M. et al. Reslizumab for poorly controlled, eosinophilic asthma: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 184, 1125–1132 (2011).
Bleecker, E. R. et al. Efficacy and safety of benralizumab for patients with severe asthma uncontrolled with high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β-agonists (SIROCCO): A randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 388, 2115–2127 (2016).
Bagnasco, D. et al. Anti-IL-5 and IL-5Ra: Efficacy and safety of new therapeutic strategies in severe uncontrolled asthma. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 5698212 (2018).
Nair, P. et al. Oral glucocorticoid-sparing effect of benralizumab in severe asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 2448–2458 (2017).
Kochenderfer, J. N. et al. Eradication of B-lineage cells and regression of lymphoma in a patient treated with autologous T cells genetically engineered to recognize CD19. Blood 116, 4099–4102 (2010).
Kalos, M. et al. T cells with chimeric antigen receptors have potent antitumor effects and can establish memory in patients with advanced leukemia. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 95ra73 (2011).
Porter, D. L., Levine, B. L., Kalos, M., Bagg, A. & June, C. H. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in chronic lymphoid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 725–733 (2011).
Barrett, D. M., Singh, N., Porter, D. L., Grupp, S. A., & June, C.H. Chimeric antigen receptor therapy for cancer. Annu. Rev. Med. 65, 333–347 (2014).
Majzner, R. G. & Mackall, C. L. Clinical lessons learned from the first leg of the CAR T cell journey. Nat. Med. 25, 1341–1355 (2019).
Heczey, A. et al. Anti-GD2 CAR-NKT cells in patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: an interim analysis. Nat. Med. 26, 1686–1690 (2020).
Straathof, K. et al. Antitumor activity without on-target off-tumor toxicity of GD2-chimeric antigen receptor T cells in patients with neuroblastoma. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, eabd6169 (2020).
Dargel, C. et al. T cells engineered to express a T-cell receptor specific for glypican-3 to recognize and kill hepatoma cells in vitro and in mice. Gastroenterology 149, 1042–1052 (2015).
Li, D. et al. Persistent polyfunctional chimeric antigen receptor T cells that target glypican 3 eliminate orthotopic hepatocellular carcinomas in mice. Gastroenterology 158, 2250-2265.e20 (2020).
Shi, D. et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-glypican-3 T-cell therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Results of phase I trials. Clin. Cancer Res. 26, 3979–3989 (2020).
Ellebrecht, C. T. et al. Reengineering chimeric antigen receptor T cells for targeted therapy of autoimmune disease. Science 353, 179–184 (2016).
Kansal, R. et al. Sustained B cell depletion by CD19-targeted CAR T cells is a highly effective treatment for murine lupus. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaav1648 (2019).
Jin, X. et al. Therapeutic efficacy of anti-CD19 CAR-T cells in a mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 18, 1896–1903 (2021).
Aghajanian, H. et al. Targeting cardiac fibrosis with engineered T cells. Nature 573, 430–433 (2019).
Amor, C. et al. Senolytic CAR T cells reverse senescence-associated pathologies. Nature 583, 127–132 (2020).
Rafiq, S., Hackett, C. S. & Brentjens, R. J. Engineering strategies to overcome the current roadblocks in CAR T cell therapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 17, 147–167 (2020).
Larson, R. C. & Maus, M. V. Recent advances and discoveries in the mechanisms and functions of CAR T cells. Nat. Rev. Cancer 21, 145–161 (2021).
Wagner, D. L. et al. Immunogenicity of CAR T cells in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 18, 379–393 (2021).
Shimabukuro-Vornhagen, A. et al. Cytokine release syndrome. J. Immunother. Cancer 6, 56 (2018).
Neelapu, S. S. et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy - assessment and management of toxicities. Rev. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 15, 47–62 (2018).
Maus, M. V. et al. T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors can cause anaphylaxis in humans. Cancer Immunol. Res. 1, 26–31 (2013).
Kershaw, M. H. et al. A phase I study on adoptive immunotherapy using gene-modified T cells for ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 12, 6106–6115 (2006).
Till, B. G. et al. Adoptive immunotherapy for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma using genetically modified autologous CD20-specific T cells. Blood 112, 2261–2271 (2008).
Kim, J. E. et al. Engineering of humanized antibodies against human interleukin 5 receptor alpha subunit that cause potent antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Front. Immunol. 11, 593748 (2020).
Migita, M. et al. Characterization of the human IL-5 receptors on eosinophils. Cell. Immunol. 133, 484–497 (1991).
FitzGerald, J. M. et al. Benralizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody, as add-on treatment for patients with severe, uncontrolled, eosinophilic asthma (CALIMA): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 388, 2128–2141 (2016).
Pease, J. E. & Horuk, R. Recent progress in the development of antagonists to the chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR4. Expert Opin. Drug Disco. 9, 467–483 (2014).
Hu, W. et al. FcγRIIB-I232T polymorphic change allosterically suppresses ligand binding. eLife 8, e46689 (2019).
Huang, J. et al. The kinetics of two-dimensional TCR and pMHC interactions determine T-cell responsiveness. Nature 464, 932–936 (2010).
Sabatel, C. et al. Exposure to bacterial CpG DNA protects from airway allergic inflammation by expanding regulatory lung interstitial macrophages. Immunity 46, 457–473 (2017).
Mesnil, C. et al. Lung-resident eosinophils represent a distinct regulatory eosinophil subset. J. Clin. Invest 126, 3279–3295 (2016).
De Alba, J. et al. House dust mite induces direct airway inflammation in vivo: Implications for future disease therapy? Eur. Respir. J. 35, 1377–1387 (2009).
Humbert, M. et al. Relationship between IL-4 and IL-5 mRNA expression and disease severity in atopic asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 156, 704–708 (1997).
Dougan, M., Dranoff, G. & Dougan, S. K. GM-CSF, IL-3, and IL-5 family of cytokines: Regulators of inflammation. Immunity 50, 796–811 (2019).
Kuang, F. L. & Bochner, B. S. Lessons learned from targeting eosinophils in human disease. Semin. Immunopathol. 43, 459-475 (2021).
Busse, W. W. et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of benralizumab in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma: 1-year results from the BORA phase 3 extension trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 7, 46–59 (2019).
Manetz, S. et al. Successful pregnancy in the setting of eosinophil depletion by benralizumab. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 9, 1405-1407.e3 (2021).
Grozdanovic, M. et al. Novel peptide nanoparticle-biased antagonist of CCR3 blocks eosinophil recruitment and airway hyperresponsiveness. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 143, 669–680.e612 (2019).
Klion, A. D. & Rothenberg, M. E. Advances in eosinophilic diseases in 2018. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 144, 1490–1494 (2019).
Feucht, J. et al. Calibration of CAR activation potential directs alternative T cell fates and therapeutic potency. Nat. Med. 25, 82–88 (2019).
Dyer, K. D. et al. Functionally competent eosinophils differentiated ex vivo in high purity from normal mouse bone marrow. J. Immunol. 181, 4004–4009 (2008).
Bettigole, S. E. et al. The transcription factor XBP1 is selectively required for eosinophil differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 16, 829–837 (2015).
Hammad, H. et al. House dust mite allergen induces asthma via Toll-like receptor 4 triggering of airway structural cells. Nat. Med. 15, 410–416 (2009).
Lee, K. S., Lee, H. K., Hayflick, J. S., Lee, Y. C. & Puri, K. D. Inhibition of phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta attenuates allergic airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in murine asthma model. FASEB J. 20, 455–465 (2006).
Singh, B., Shinagawa, K., Taube, C., Gelfand, E. W. & Pabst, R. Strain-specific differences in perivascular inflammation in lungs in two murine models of allergic airway inflammation. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 141, 223–229 (2005).
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFC2700604, 2021YFA1102000), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81920108001, 81870007), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (LD19H160001), Medical Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Provincial Health Commission (WKJ-ZJ-2213), and Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-Level Innovative Health Talents (2016-63).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, S., Chen, G., Xu, F. et al. Treatment of allergic eosinophilic asthma through engineered IL-5-anchored chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Cell Discov 8, 80 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-022-00433-y