Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the deadliest malignancies in the world. Research into the key genes that maintain the malignant behavior of cancer cells is crucial for the treatment of HCC. Here, we identified ubiquitin‐specific peptidase 44 (USP44), a member of the deubiquitinase family, as a novel regulator of HCC progression. The tumor suppressive function of USP44 was evaluated in a series of in vitro and in vivo experiments. Through quantitative proteomics examination, we demonstrated that USP44 inhibits HCC PDL1 expression by downregulating the Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway. Mechanistically, we found that USP44 directly interacts with Itch, an E3 ligase involved in Hh signaling, and promotes the deubiquitination and stabilization of Itch. These events result in the proteasomal degradation of Gli1 and subsequent inactivation of Hh signaling, which ultimately suppresses PDL1 expression and the progression of HCC. Furthermore, the HCC tissue microarray was analyzed by immunohistochemistry to evaluate the pathological relevance of the USP44/Itch/Gli1/PDL1 axis. Finally, the Gli1 inhibitor GANT61 was found to act in synergy with anti-PDL1 therapy. Overall, USP44 can act as a suppressive gene in HCC by modulating Hh signaling, and co-inhibition of Gli1 and PDL1 might be an effective novel combination strategy for treating HCC patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
With an estimated 906,000 new cases and 830,000 deaths, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most lethal malignancy worldwide [1]. Rapid proliferation and distant metastasis remain the major causes contributing to the poor prognosis of HCC patients. Although great breakthroughs have been made in the evolution of surgical removal, chemotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-programmed cell death (/ligand) 1 (PD1/PDL1) immunotherapy, the survival outcomes of advanced HCC patients are still frustrating [2,3,4]. Thus, it is imperative to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms of HCC progression and identify effective strategies for HCC treatment.
Deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) are proteolytic enzymes that can reverse ubiquitination-mediated protein degradation through cleaving ubiquitin from substrate proteins [5]. Deregulation of DUBs can result in significant physiological consequences and is correlated with multiple diseases including inflammatory diseases [6], neural degeneration [7] and cancer [8]. The deubiquitinating enzyme ubiquitin‐specific peptidase 44 (USP44), a member of the ubiquitin-specific protease family, is located at 12q22 and encodes an 82-kD protein [9]. Recently, USP44 was found to be involved in the progression of multiple malignancies [9,10,11]. However, the role and underlying mechanism of USP44 in HCC remain elusive.
The Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway is crucial for regulating normal cell proliferation and embryonic development [12, 13]. Its aberrant activation can result in the onset and development of multiple human cancers, including HCC. Hh signaling can be initiated through the interaction of Hh ligands with the Patched1 (Ptch1) receptor, which relieves its repressive effect on the coreceptor Smoothened (SMO). This interaction triggers the activation of the glioma-associated oncogene homolog (Gli) family upon dissociation from the suppressor of fused (SuFu) protein, a negative modulator of the signaling pathway. In mammals, three members are identified in the Gli family, including Gli1, Gli2, and Gli3, among which Gli1 is the only transcriptional activator [14, 15]. Activated Gli1 triggers the transcription of a panel of genes, including Bcl2, c-Myc, Nanog, FOXS1, and PDL1, and promotes the proliferation, survival, invasion, and migration of cancer cells [16,17,18,19,20]. Accordingly, targeting the Hh/Gli1 pathway is expected to be a promising strategy for cancer therapy. Gli1 is regulated by several types of posttranslational modifications (PTMs), including ubiquitination [21]. Itch has emerged as an E3 ubiquitin ligase that promotes the ubiquitination and degradation of the Gli1 protein [22]. However, the upstream signaling and biological processes that control Itch expression are poorly understood.
In the present study, we revealed a previously undescribed role of USP44 in suppressing HCC progression and delineated that the USP44/Itch/Gli1 axis is critical for triggering the progression and PDL1 expression of HCC. Notably, targeting the USP44/Itch/Gli1 axis using the Gli1 inhibitor GANT61 acts in synergy with anti-PDL1 therapy, which may benefit patients with HCC.
Materials and methods
Patients and samples
The study included two tissue microarrays (TMA1 and TMA2) derived from patients who underwent curative resection in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. TMA1 is composed of 191 HCC samples and TMA2 is composed of 56 HCC samples. To measure the mRNA and protein expression of USP44 in tissue from HCC patients, specimens were randomly obtained from 56 HCC patients who underwent curative resection at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. To detect the protein expression of USP44, Itch, Gli1, and PDL1 in tissue from HCC, specimens were randomly obtained from another cohort of 25 HCC patients who underwent curative resection. All patients signed informed consent forms approved by the Ethics Committee of Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University.
Immunofluorescence
HCC cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. Then, fixed HCC cells were incubated in 5% Triton X-100 for 10 min and blocked with 5% bovine serum (BSA) (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), followed by incubation with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. After washing with PBS, anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 or anti-rabbit 546 dye conjugates were used as secondary antibodies (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to stain nuclei. The localization of the proteins was viewed through a confocal laser scanning microscope (SP-II; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
EdU assay
For the 5-Ethynyl-20-deoxyuridine assay (EdU), 5 × 103 cells were seeded in per well of 96-well plates. After the cells were cultured for 24 h, 5-ethynyl-20-deoxyuridine (EdU; RiboBio) was utilized to incubate the cells for 4 h. Then, the cells were incubated with 1x Apollo reaction cocktail for 30 min and the DNA contents of the cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 (5 mg/mL) in each well for 20 min. A fluorescence microscope was used to image the cells. To evaluate the degree of the correlation of mitotic index, the S-phase fraction was used as marker of cell proliferation as previously described [23].
Cell Counting Kit-8 assay
Transfected cells (5 × 103 per well) were seeded into 96-well plates. A CCK-8 assay was used to detect cell viability after 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 and 144 h. 10 μL of CCK-8 reagent (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) was added to each well. After incubation for 1 h in cell incubator, the absorbance at wavelength of 450 nm was recorded.
Wound-healing migration assay
To detect the migration ability, transfected cells were plated into 6-well plates. When cells grew to 80% to 90% confluence, a scratched cell-free area was made through a 200 μl pipette tip. Subsequently, the cells were incubated, and wound closure was observed at 0 h, 24 h and 48 h. Three randomly selected wound areas were analyzed. The wound-healing rate was measured as 100%-(the ratio of the remaining cell-free area to the area of the initial wound) (estimated as a mean percentage) by Image J software [24].
Transwell Matrigel invasion assays
For the invasion assay, a Transwell system (Millcell, Germany) with Matrigel (BD Biosciences) coated above the membrane was employed. The indicated stably transfected cells were suspended in serum-free DMEM at a concentration of 2 × 104/ml. Then, 500 µL of cell suspension was loaded in the upper chamber. The bottom chamber was filled with 500 µL of DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. 24 h later, the migratory and invasive cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at time temperature. Then, 0.1% crystal violet was employed to stain the cells for 15 min. Cells in five randomly selected fields of view were counted. Relative cell invasion ratio refers to the relative ratio of invasive cell number between different groups [24].
Animal studies
All in vivo animal-related experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (Nanchang, China). BALB/C nude mice and wild-type C57BL/6 mice (5–6 weeks, male) purchased from Charles River Laboratory (Beijing, China) were maintained in a temperature-controlled, specific-pathogen-free (SPF) animal laboratory.
USP44fl/fl and Alb-cre mice (both C57BL/6) were obtained from Shanghai Model Organisms Center (Shanghai, China) and bred in a pathogen-free environment according to the guidelines of the animal facility in Nanchang University. USP44fl/fl mice were crossed with Alb-cre mice to generate liver conditional USP44-knockout (USP44 cKO) mice. Seven-week-old male USP44 cKO mice were used for subsequent experiments.
For the subcutaneous tumor model, mice were randomly divided into different subgroups (6 mice per group) and were subcutaneously injected with 3 × 106 control and USP44 stably overexpressing HCC cells tumor cells. Mice were sacrificed 4 weeks after inoculation of tumor cells, and the tumor weights were measured. For metastatic tumor models, HCC cells (1 × 107) were inoculated into the caudal vein of mice. An in vivo imaging system (IVIS, PerkinElmer, USA) was used to monitor tumor progression in mice (5 mice per group). After the mice were sacrificed, lung tissues of these mice were collected and haematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining was employed to evaluate pulmonary metastatic nodules.
For the orthotopic tumor model, after the subcutaneous tumors grew to 1 cm3, subcutaneous tumor tissues were resected and cut into 1-mm3 pieces for orthotopic xenograft implantation. Xenografted mice were sacrificed after 7 weeks and the volume of tumors was measured using the formula: V = [length/2] × [width2].
For combination therapy, C57BL/6 tumor-bearing mice were injected intraperitoneally with 50 mg/kg GANT61 (Selleck) and/or 100 μg anti-PDL1 mAb (BioXCell) or isotype control mAb. An ultrasound imaging platform was used to evaluate tumor growth every 5 days.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software. Student’s t-test was used for two-group comparisons and one-way ANOVA was used for multiple comparisons. Differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05. The Kaplan–Meier method was utilized to draw survival curves. Spearman’s correlation test was employed in correlation analyses. All experiments were conducted at least 3 times and all results are shown as the mean ± SD.
(Additional materials and methods can be obtained from the supplementary materials and methods.)
Results
USP44 expression is decreased in HCC and correlates with a poor prognosis
Using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, we found that low expression of USP44 is significantly correlated with poor prognosis in HCC patients (Fig. 1A). However, to the best of our knowledge, the role of USP44 in HCC has seldomly been reported. To evaluate the potential role of USP44 in HCC, we first evaluated the protein and mRNA levels in our in-house 56-paired HCC samples. We found that USP44 expression was significantly decreased in HCC compared with peritumor tissues (Fig. 1B, C). Next, we performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) using tissue microarrays (TMAs) from 191 HCC patients who underwent curative resection and we found that the median overall survival (OS) time was significantly shorter in patients with low USP44 expression than in those with high expression (Fig. 1D), which is consistent with the data from the TCGA database. Additionally, HCC patients with low USP44 expression also had a higher recurrence rate (Fig. 1E). Furthermore, we found that patients with low USP44 expression were prone to larger tumor size, distant metastasis, and late-stage disease (Table S1). Additionally, multivariate analysis showed that low USP44 was an independent predictor of both OS and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (Table S2). Next, we demonstrated that USP44 knockout in murine hepatocytes impaired the tumor suppressive function of USP44 in a mouse model of diethylnitrosamine (DEN)/carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced hepatocarcinogenesis (Fig. 1F–I). We confirmed that USP44 deletion significantly promoted the proliferation of tumor cells through immunofluorescence of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in tumor samples (Fig. 1G, J). Above all, our data suggest that USP44 may have a tumor suppressive role in HCC and has the potential to serve as a diagnostic biomarker for HCC.
USP44 inhibits HCC proliferation and metastasis in vitro and in vivo
To demonstrate the tumor suppressive role of USP44 in HCC, we further performed in vitro and in vivo experiments. We first detected the endogenous USP44 levels in different HCC cell lines or the control nontumoral cell line L02 using western blot and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) (Fig. 2A, B). To further investigate the role of USP44 in HCC cell lines, we used USP44 short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) to construct USP44-knockdown Hep3B and HepG2 cell lines (Fig. 2C, D). We also used USP44-overexpressing plasmids to establish USP44-overexpressing HCCLM3 and MHCC97H cell lines (Fig. 2E, F). The expression levels of USP44 in these cells with USP44 knockdown or overexpression were confirmed by both western blot and qRT-PCR (Fig. 2C–F). Using colony formation and Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assays, we found that USP44 overexpression suppressed HCC cell growth, while USP44 knockdown showed the opposite effects (Fig. 2G–N). Furthermore, using Transwell assays, we found that USP44 overexpression significantly decreased the ability of HCC cells to migrate and invade, whereas USP44 downregulation exerted the opposite effect (Fig. 2O, P). To explore the role of USP44 in HCC growth in vivo, we established a subcutaneous tumor model and a liver orthotopic xenograft tumor model in mice. Consistently, we found that USP44 upregulation effectively inhibited tumor growth in mice (Fig. 2Q, R). Additionally, tumors with USP44 overexpression had less lung metastasis than the control group (Fig. 2S). Collectively, these results suggest the tumor suppressive role of USP44 in HCC.
USP44 inactivates Hh signaling and PDL1 expression through Itch
The aforementioned results prompted us to perform Tandem Mass Tag™ Quantitative Proteomics examination to identify the potential regulatory mechanism of USP44 in HCC. In the USP44-knockdown Hep3B cell line, we identified 2137 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) compared with the control group, and PDL1 was significantly upregulated (Fig. 3A). In addition, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis indicated that UPS44 silencing markedly activated the Hh signaling pathway (Fig. 3B, C). To further verify the role of USP44 in Hh signaling, we used USP44-knockdown HCC cell lines and found that low USP44 expression enhanced the activity of the Hh pathway-reporter (Fig. 3D, Supplementary Fig. 1A). Next, we evaluated the expression of Glis, the terminal and most potent effector of Hh signaling. The western blot results showed that the expression of Gli1, but not Gli2 or Gli3, was dramatically increased in USP44-downregulated HCC cells (Fig. 3E, Supplementary Fig. 1B). Notably, PDL1 expression was also significantly upregulated with USP44 downregulation (Fig. 3E, Supplementary Fig. 1B). We further investigated the regulatory effect of USP44 on Hh signaling by detecting the expression of its target genes including Bcl2, C-Myc, Nanog, FOXS1 and PDL1. As expected, USP44-knockdown increased the mRNA levels of these target genes (Fig. 3F, Supplementary Fig. 1C). These findings were further confirmed by experiments employing ectopic overexpression of USP44 and treatment with the Hh pathway agonist SAG, in which the SAG-induced increase in reporter activity was counteracted by USP44 overexpression (Fig. 3G, Supplementary Fig. 1D). Additionally, the increase in the mRNA level of these target genes caused by SAG treatment was completely rescued by USP44 overexpression (Fig. 3H, Supplementary Fig. 1E). Consistent with these data, USP44 overexpression could impaired the increase in Gli1 and PDL1 expression induced by SAG treatment (Fig. 3I, Supplementary Fig. 1F, G). Furthermore, we examined the reporter activity of Hh signaling and the expression of its target genes in Ptch1−/−HEK-293 cells wherein the Hh signaling pathway was constitutively active. Following upregulating the expression of USP44 in Ptch1−/−HEK-293 cells, we observed a remarkable reduction in the reporter activity of the Hh signaling pathway and the mRNA level of the target genes (Fig. 3J, K).
However, the qRT-PCR results demonstrated no significant difference in the mRNA level of Glis in the USP44 knockdown or overexpression groups (Supplementary Fig. 1H–K), implying that Gli1 was modulated by USP44 in a posttranslational manner. Since USP44 could not directly interact with Gli1 (Fig. 3L), we hypothesized that USP44 negatively regulates Gli1 expression by affecting ubiquitin E3 ligase(s), which are known to destabilize Gli1. Among the known E3 ligases, including βTrCP, Itch, pCAF, Skp2, and SPOP, we found that USP44 was associated with only Itch (Fig. 3M). More importantly, overexpression of USP44 resulted in an increase in Itch expression and a subsequent decline in Gli1 protein levels (Fig. 3N), whereas its genetic inhibition led to the opposite effect (Fig. 3O). Additionally, the modulation of USP44 had no effect on the expression of other E3 ligases for Gli1 degradation or on the protein levels of other Itch substrates including LATS1/2, smad7, RASSF5 and wbp2 (Fig. 3N, O, Supplementary Fig. 2A, B), suggesting that USP44 might inhibit Gli1 expression by upregulating the Itch protein. Furthermore, we found that USP44 overexpression dramatically inhibited the expression of Gli1 and PDL1, while Itch knockdown profoundly suppressed the USP44-induced decline in Gli1 and PDL1 expression (Fig. 3P). In contrast, the downregulation of USP44 enhanced the expression of Gli1 and PDL1, whereas the upregulation of Itch diminished the increase in Gli1 and PDL1 caused by USP44 knockdown (Supplementary Fig. 2C). In addition, we also observed that the downregulation of Hh transcriptional activity and the expression of target genes induced by USP44 overexpression were impaired by Itch inhibition (Supplementary Fig. 2D–G), indicating that Itch is critical for USP44-mediated regulation of the Hh signaling pathway. Moreover, since the C-terminal PPXYs and pSP degron within the Gli1 protein are essential for the association of Itch [22], we assessed whether the regulatory effect of USP44 depended on the presence of this motif. Thus, wild-type Gli1 (His-Gli1 WT) or mutant Gli1 (His-Gli1 ∆C) lacking the motif needed for Itch interaction was transfected into USP44-knockdown HCC cells. As a result, we found that USP44 knockdown could led to an increase in the expression of wild-type (WT) Gli1 but not mutant Gli1 (Fig. 3Q). Taken together, these results strongly support that USP44 specifically modulates Itch-dependent Gli1 protein levels and thus inactivates the Hh signaling pathway and PDL1 expression.
USP44 stabilizes Itch by deubiquitinating Itch
We then investigated how USP44 regulates the expression of Itch in HCC cells. qRT-PCR was performed to test the mRNA levels of Itch in USP44-downregulated or USP44-upregulated HCC cells. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 3A–D, neither USP44 downregulation nor upregulation affected the mRNA level of Itch. However, the results of western blot showed that the inhibition of Itch expression caused by USP44 knockdown was fully restored by treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (Fig. 4A), suggesting that USP44 controls the turnover of Itch via the proteasomal pathway.
Given that USP44 is a DUB that promotes the stability of substrates, we sought to investigate whether USP44 promoted Itch stabilization through a deubiquitination event. Thus, we first co-transfected exogenous USP44 and Itch into HCC cells, and the reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) assay showed that USP44 and Itch interacted with each other (Fig. 4B). The direct association between USP44 and Itch was further verified by a GST pull-down experiment (Fig. 4C). Moreover, we employed immunofluorescence assays, and the immunofluorescence signals showed the endogenous USP44 and Itch proteins in HCC cells. Our results revealed that USP44 was colocalized with Itch (Fig. 4D), suggesting that USP44 interacts with Itch in HCC cells. Next, we investigated whether USP44 regulates the stabilization of Itch. Following treatment with cycloheximide (CHX), Itch displayed a shorter half-life in the USP44-downregulated group than in the control group (Fig. 4E, Supplementary Fig. 3E). Consistently, the overexpression of WT USP44, but not the deubiquitinase inactive mutant of USP44(C282A), was sufficient to induce an extended half-life of the Itch protein (Fig. 4F, Supplementary Fig. 3F), indicating that USP44 stabilized the expression of Itch in a deubiquitinase activity-dependent manner. These findings prompted us to evaluate the ubiquitination level of Itch controlled by USP44. We observed that high levels of USP44, but not USP44(C282A), significantly inhibited the ubiquitination level of Itch (Fig. 4G). Conversely, USP44-knockdown robustly increased the level of ubiquitinated Itch (Fig. 4H). Furthermore, we conducted an in vitro deubiquitination assay by purifying ubiquitinated Itch from cells expressing Myc-Itch and HA-Ub and incubating recombinant USP44 with ubiquitinated Itch in a cell-free system. The addition of recombinant USP44 effectively deubiquitinated Itch in vitro (Fig. 4I). Overall, these data validated that USP44 deubiquitinates and stabilizes Itch by functioning as a DUB.
USP44 inhibits the proliferation and migration of HCC cells by suppressing the Hh signaling pathway in vitro
Because our findings demonstrate that USP44 is critical for Hh signaling activity and that Hh signaling is known to play important roles in the modulation of tumors’ malignant behavior, we examined whether USP44 could influence HCC progression by regulating Hh signaling. Therefore, we first evaluated the effect of USP44 on the proliferative ability of HCC cells. The results from CCK-8 and EdU assays showed that the upregulation of USP44 significantly inhibited cell growth, while Itch knockdown impaired the decline in cell proliferation induced by USP44 overexpression (Fig. 5A–C). In contrast, the knockdown of USP44 enhanced cell growth, whereas Itch overexpression mitigated the increase in cell proliferation enhanced by USP44 knockdown (Supplementary Fig. 4A–C). In addition, wound healing and transwell assays were used to measure the effects of USP44 on the invasion and migration of HCC cells. As a result, USP44 overexpression suppressed cellular invasion and migration, while downregulation of Itch alleviated the inhibition of cellular invasion and migration induced by USP44 overexpression (Fig. 5D, E). USP44-knockdown promoted cellular invasion and migration, whereas the overexpression of Itch diminished the increase in cellular invasion and migration caused by USP44 knockdown (Supplementary Fig. 4D, E). These data indicated that USP44 inhibited proliferation, invasion, and migration by modulating the expression of Itch in HCC cells.
Furthermore, to validate that the Hh signaling pathway participates in the regulation of USP44 on the malignant behavior of HCC cells, we introduced WT Gli1 and mutant Gli1 into USP44-overexpressing HCC cells. Mutant Gli1 was constructed by generating point mutations of Ser102(S102), Ser102(S408), Ser481(S481) and Thr107(T1074) to alanine. Mutation of these four sites into alanine prevents its phosphorylation and nuclear import, which consequently facilitates the stabilization of Gli1 and activation of Hh signaling. As shown in Fig. 5F, mutant Gli1, but not WT Gli1, escaped Itch-mediated degradation promoted by USP44 overexpression. Moreover, the introduction of mutant Gli1 significantly reversed the reduction in cellular proliferation, invasion, and migration caused by USP44 overexpression (Fig. 5G–J). Together, these findings suggested that overexpression of USP44 inhibited cellular proliferation and migration through inhibition of the Hh pathway in vitro.
USP44 impairs the growth and metastasis of HCC by inhibiting the Hh signaling pathway in vivo
To evaluate the role of USP44 during HCC progression in vivo, we subcutaneously implanted HCCLM3 cells stably expressing USP44 vectors into nude mice. Consistent with the results observed in cell culture experiments, we found that the intratumor protein levels of Itch were evidently increased while Gli1 expression was dramatically decreased in the USP44-overexpressing group compared with the control group. Knockdown of Itch impaired the decline in the intratumor expression of Gli1 induced by USP44 overexpression (Fig. 6A). In addition, USP44 overexpression inhibited the growth of the tumors whereas the downregulation of Itch blunted the decline in tumor growth (Fig. 6B–D). To determine the effect of USP44 on HCC metastasis, orthotopic implanted xenografts in nude mice were employed. USP44 overexpression reduced the metastatic potential, whereas Itch knockdown reversed the decline in the metastatic potential caused by USP44 overexpression (Fig. 6E, F). These data collectively suggested that Itch upregulation is important in USP44 overexpression-mediated tumor growth and metastasis inhibition in vivo.
Next, we sought to verify that the Hh signaling pathway was involved in the modulatory effect of USP44 on tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. We examined the effect of a nuclear-residing Gli1 mutant on USP44 overexpression-mediated tumor inhibition. Consistent with the aforementioned findings, the intratumor protein levels of WT Gli1, but not the mutant Gli1, were inhibited by USP44 overexpression (Fig. 6G). In addition, the upregulation of USP44 delayed tumor growth and lung metastasis while the introduction of mutant Gli1 attenuated the suppression of tumor growth and metastasis mediated by USP44 overexpression (Fig. 6H–L). Collectively, these data suggest that the regulatory effects on the Hh pathway are critical for USP44 to arrest the growth and metastasis of HCC in vivo.
GANT61 improves the anti-PDL1 therapeutic efficacy by targeting Gli1
To investigate the clinical significance of the USP44-Itch-Gli1-PDL1 axis and identify their correlation in HCC, we tested their expression in HCC tissue specimens by performing IHC staining and western blot. In TMA2, high levels of USP44, and Itch and low expression of Gli1 and PDL1 occurred frequently and concomitantly (Fig. 7A, B). We also examined the protein levels of USP44, Itch, Gli1 and PDL1 in 25 of our in-house HCC tissues and found consistent results (Fig. 7C).
We further introduced GANT61, an inhibitor of Gli1 [25, 26]. By establishing an orthotopic syngeneic model of HCC using Hepa1-6 cells, we systemically administered GANT61 and an anti-PDL1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (Fig. 7D). Our results indeed confirmed the efficacy of the combination therapy of GANT61 and anti-PDL1 mAb. GANT61 and anti-PDL1 mAb combination therapy effectively inhibited tumor growth and prolonged the survival rate of mice compared with the control and monotherapy groups (Fig. 7E–G, Supplementary Fig. 5A). In addition, there were no significant changes in serum indicators of liver and kidney function among the different groups of mice during treatment, indicating that this approach may have limited damage to the liver and kidney function of mice (Supplementary Fig. 5B, C). Collectively, our findings demonstrated that targeting Gli1 effectively enhanced immune checkpoint blockade in preclinical models of HCC.
Discussion
HCC is a malignant tumor with poor prognosis, and exploring regulatory targets is a crucial challenge in the treatment of HCC. Increasing evidence has shown that aberrant activation of Hh signaling is closely associated with a multitude of solid tumor types, including HCC [27, 28]. Hh signaling is considered to regulate the process of hepatic carcinogenesis, progression, metastasis and drug resistance through the activation of the downstream effector protein Gli1 [29, 30]. Interestingly, emerging evidence has shown that Gli1 also functions as a positive regulator of PDL1 expression, highlighting the potential importance of Hh signaling in tumor immunotherapy [20]. Therefore, probing upstream regulators of Hh signaling has emerged as an attractive option to develop potential therapeutic strategies. Herein, we revealed that USP44 may exhibit a tumor suppressive role in HCC progression through inhibiting the Hh pathway.
USP44 is a member of the ubiquitin-specific protease family that is able to remove ubiquitin modifications from its substrates and thus protects substrates from proteolysis. Previous reports have demonstrated that USP44 plays diverse roles in the initiation and development of cancer [31,32,33,34]. A recent study suggested that low USP44 expression is associated with poorer survival and a later tumor stage in HCC [35]. However, the role of USP44 in HCC progression requires further investigation. In this study, we originally found that USP44 is downregulated in HCC tissues and that low USP44 expression is correlated with poor prognosis in patients with HCC. Subsequently, both in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that USP44 inhibits the proliferative and invasive capacity of HCC by inactivating Hh signaling.
Gli1 is a terminal effector of the Hh cascade and elicits signal amplification by acting as a transcription factor [30]. The expression of Gli1 is well regulated by several types of posttranslational modifications, including ubiquitination [36, 37]. Itch is a well-characterized E3 ligase that binds with Gli1 at its C-terminus, thereby facilitating its polyubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation. Indeed, increasing evidence has revealed a tumor suppressor role of Itch through antagonizing the activation of the Gli1-dependent Hh signaling pathway [32]. Nevertheless, Itch is frequently maintained in an inactive state in tumor due to its autoubiquitylation through K48 linkage [32, 33]. Hence, it is important to explore DUBs that stabilize the expression of Itch, thus limiting the oncogenic properties of Gli1 and then maintaining Hh signaling off. In this work, we demonstrated that USP44 inactivates Hh signaling by deubiquitinating and stabilizing Itch, which in turn induces the ubiquitylation and proteolysis of Gli1. This conclusion was based on the observations discussed below. First, wild-type USP44, but not the deubiquitinase inactive mutant, was identified to interact with Itch and remove the polyubiquitin chains from Itch. Second, USP44 promoted the stabilization of Itch and in turn led to Gli1 degradation. However, when the Gli1 motif (PPXYs and pSP degron) which is essential for the association of Itch was mutated, the decrease in Itch induced by USP44 downregulation failed to stabilize Gli1 expression. In addition, as both Itch downregulation and Gli1 overexpression were able to reverse the carcinostatic role of USP44, we suggested that USP44 was able to inhibit HCC growth and metastasis through inactivating Hh signaling in an Itch-dependent manner.
Notably, several studies have reported that the cross-talk between DUB and E3 ligases plays a critical role in regulating cellular protein dynamics [38,39,40,41]. The interaction of DUB and E3 ligases has the potential to facilitate multifaceted results, including E3 ligase antagonization, E3 ligase deubiquitylation, and polyubiquitin chain editing on substrates [41]. For example, several DUBs, including USP2, USP12, and USP26 have been reported to promote the expression of the E3 ubiquitin ligase MDM2 and consequently result in the degradation of the substrate protein p53 [38,39,40]. Another striking example involves the WNT signal transducing protein disheveled (DVL2), which is coordinately controlled by the E3 ubiquitin ligase WWP1 and deubiquitylase USP9X. The coupling of DUB and E3 activities on DVL2 establishes a ubiquitin rheostat that determines its participation in either canonical WNT or noncanonical WNT signaling [41]. Here, we identified that USP44 interacts with Itch to form a DUB-E3 complex and stabilize the expression of Itch, thereby hampering Gli1-mediated Hh signaling activation and PDL1 expression. Clinically, we observed that USP44 possessed a positive correlation with Itch expression but a negative correlation with Gli1 or PDL1 expression in HCC. In addition, the Gli1 inhibitor GANT61, which has previously been shown to inhibit the progression of several tumors [25, 26], has been shown to significantly improve anti-PDL1 efficacy in a murine model. Nevertheless, future studies will be necessary to develop USP44 activators to confirm the anticarcinogenic role of USP44 in the progression of HCC.
In summary, in this study we identified USP44 as a novel deubiquitinating modulator that inhibits Hh signaling and PDL1 expression in HCC. USP44 deubiquitinates and stabilizes Itch and thus promotes Itch-mediated degradation of Gli1. The downregulated expression of USP44 in HCC tissues drives sustained activation of Hh signaling and the downstream oncogenic response. Therefore, our study provides a new perspective for HCC intervention by targeting the USP44-Itch-Gli1 signaling axis.
Data availability
All data relevant to the study are included in the paper or uploaded as supplementary material. The data and sources associated with this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.
Finn RS, Ryoo BY, Merle P, Kudo M, Bouattour M, Lim HY, et al. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:193–202.
Olatosi B, Vermund SH, Li X. Power of big data in ending HIV. AIDS. 2021;35:S1–S5.
Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc JF, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:378–90.
Reyes-Turcu FE, Ventii KH, Wilkinson KD. Regulation and cellular roles of ubiquitin-specific deubiquitinating enzymes. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:363–97.
Lopez-Castejon G, Edelmann MJ. Deubiquitinases: novel therapeutic targets in immune surveillance? Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:3481371.
Todi SV, Paulson HL. Balancing act: deubiquitinating enzymes in the nervous system. Trends Neurosci. 2011;34:370–82.
Pinto-Fernandez A, Kessler BM. DUBbing Cancer: deubiquitylating enzymes involved in epigenetics, DNA damage and the cell cycle as therapeutic targets. Front Genet. 2016;7:133.
Zhou J, Wang T, Qiu T, Chen Z, Ma X, Zhang L, et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease-44 inhibits the proliferation and migration of cells via inhibition of JNK pathway in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:214.
Xiang T, Jiang HS, Zhang BT, Liu G. CircFOXO3 functions as a molecular sponge for miR-143-3p to promote the progression of gastric carcinoma via upregulating USP44. Gene. 2020;753:144798.
Liu T, Sun B, Zhao X, Li Y, Zhao X, Liu Y, et al. USP44+ cancer stem cell subclones contribute to breast cancer aggressiveness by promoting vasculogenic mimicry. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015;14:2121–31.
Ingham PW, McMahon AP. Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles. Genes Dev. 2001;15:3059–87.
Briscoe J, Therond PP. The mechanisms of Hedgehog signalling and its roles in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14:416–29.
Doheny D, Manore SG, Wong GL, Lo HW. Hedgehog signaling and truncated GLI1 in cancer. Cells. 2020;9:2114.
Ruiz IAA. Catching a Gli-mpse of hedgehog. Cell. 1997;90:193–6.
Mazumdar T, DeVecchio J, Shi T, Jones J, Agyeman A, Houghton JA, et al. Hedgehog signaling drives cellular survival in human colon carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2011;71:1092–102.
Sharma N, Nanta R, Sharma J, Gunewardena S, Singh KP, Shankar S, et al. PI3K/AKT/mTOR and sonic hedgehog pathways cooperate together to inhibit human pancreatic cancer stem cell characteristics and tumor growth. Oncotarget. 2015;6:32039–60.
Varnat F, Siegl-Cachedenier I, Malerba M, Gervaz P, Ruiz IAA, Nanog. Loss of WNT-TCF addiction and enhancement of HH-GLI1 signalling define the metastatic transition of human colon carcinomas. EMBO Mol Med. 2010;2:440–57.
Diao Y, Rahman MF, Vyatkin Y, Azatyan A, St LG, Kapranov P, et al. Identification of novel GLI1 target genes and regulatory circuits in human cancer cells. Mol Oncol. 2018;12:1718–34.
Koh V, Chakrabarti J, Torvund M, Steele N, Hawkins JA, Ito Y, et al. Hedgehog transcriptional effector GLI mediates mTOR-Induced PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer organoids. Cancer Lett. 2021;518:59–71.
Hui CC, Angers S. Gli proteins in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2011;27:513–37.
Di Marcotullio L, Greco A, Mazza D, Canettieri G, Pietrosanti L, Infante P, et al. Numb activates the E3 ligase Itch to control Gli1 function through a novel degradation signal. Oncogene. 2011;30:65–76.
Xie P, Wang H, Xie J, Huang Z, Chen S, Cheng X, et al. USP7 promotes proliferation of papillary thyroid carcinoma cells through TBX3-mediated p57(KIP2) repression. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2020;518:111037.
Zhou P, Li Y, Li B, Zhang M, Liu Y, Yao Y, et al. NMIIA promotes tumor growth and metastasis by activating the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway and EMT in pancreatic cancer. Oncogene. 2019;38:5500–15.
Wang S, Wang Y, Xun X, Zhang C, Xiang X, Cheng Q, et al. Hedgehog signaling promotes sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma patient-derived organoids. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020;39:22.
Reyes-Ramos AM, Ramos-Cruz KP, Rodriguez-Merced NJ, Martinez-Montemayor MM, Franqui-Rios ND, Rios-Grant JP, et al. Mesenchymal cells support the oncogenicity and therapeutic response of the hedgehog pathway in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancers. 2019;11:1522.
Wang Y, Han C, Lu L, Magliato S, Wu T. Hedgehog signaling pathway regulates autophagy in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Hepatology. 2013;58:995–1010.
Chan IS, Guy CD, Chen Y, Lu J, Swiderska-Syn M, Michelotti GA, et al. Paracrine Hedgehog signaling drives metabolic changes in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2012;72:6344–50.
Arzumanyan A, Sambandam V, Clayton MM, Choi SS, Xie G, Diehl AM, et al. Hedgehog signaling blockade delays hepatocarcinogenesis induced by hepatitis B virus X protein. Cancer Res. 2012;72:5912–20.
Ding J, Li HY, Zhang L, Zhou Y, Wu J. Hedgehog signaling, a critical pathway governing the development and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cells. 2021;10:123.
Zheng J, Wang B, Zheng R, Zhang J, Huang C, Zheng R, et al. Linc-RA1 inhibits autophagy and promotes radioresistance by preventing H2Bub1/USP44 combination in glioma cells. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:758.
Park JM, Lee JE, Park CM, Kim JH. USP44 Promotes the tumorigenesis of prostate cancer cells through EZH2 protein stabilization. Mol Cells. 2019;42:17–27.
Yang J, Wei P, Barbi J, Huang Q, Yang E, Bai Y, et al. The deubiquitinase USP44 promotes Treg function during inflammation by preventing FOXP3 degradation. EMBO Rep. 2020;21:e50308.
Huang T, Zhang Q, Ren W, Yan B, Yi L, Tang T, et al. USP44 suppresses proliferation and enhances apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells by inactivating the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway via Axin1 deubiquitination. Cell Biol Int. 2020;44:1651–9.
Zhou H, Yang L, Lin X, Chan TF, Lee NP, Tse W, et al. Integrated network findings reveal ubiquitin-specific protease 44 overexpression suppresses tumorigenicity of liver cancer. Aging. 2023;15:4304–18.
Zhou A, Lin K, Zhang S, Ma L, Xue J, Morris SA, et al. Gli1-induced deubiquitinase USP48 aids glioblastoma tumorigenesis by stabilizing Gli1. EMBO Rep. 2017;18:1318–30.
Abe Y, Tanaka N. Fine-Tuning of GLI Activity through arginine methylation: Its mechanisms and function. Cells. 2020;9:1973.
Stevenson LF, Sparks A, Allende-Vega N, Xirodimas DP, Lane DP, Saville MK. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP2a regulates the p53 pathway by targeting Mdm2. EMBO J. 2007;26:976–86.
Lahav-Baratz S, Kravtsova-Ivantsiv Y, Golan S, Ciechanover A. The testis-specific USP26 is a deubiquitinating enzyme of the ubiquitin ligase Mdm2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;482:106–11.
McClurg UL, Chit N, Azizyan M, Edwards J, Nabbi A, Riabowol KT, et al. Molecular mechanism of the TP53-MDM2-AR-AKT signalling network regulation by USP12. Oncogene. 2018;37:4679–91.
Nielsen CP, MacGurn JA. Coupling conjugation and deconjugation activities to achieve cellular ubiquitin dynamics. Trends Biochem Sci. 2020;45:427–39.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82260459,82303342,82160576), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20224BAB216068, 20212BAB216052), the Incubated Natural Science Foundation of Hospital (2021YNFY12003) and Academic and technical leaders of major disciplines Foundation (20204BCJL22049).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SSC, BHZ, WH, and PYX designed and performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscripts. BHZ provided patient tissue samples and analyzed clinical data. QL, YY, and XQK performed the experiments and analyzed data. HBH, WW, and PYX revised the manuscripts. PYX, WW supervised the entire project, designed the experiments.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University and the Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Hans-Uwe Simon
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, S., Zhou, B., Huang, W. et al. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP44 suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma progression by inhibiting Hedgehog signaling and PDL1 expression. Cell Death Dis 14, 830 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06358-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06358-y