Abstract
The outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has prompted the scientific community to explore potential treatments or vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes the illness. While SARS-CoV-2 is mostly considered a respiratory pathogen, several neurological complications have been reported, raising questions about how it may enter the Central Nervous System (CNS). Receptors such as ACE2, CD147, TMPRSS2, and NRP1 have been identified in brain cells and may be involved in facilitating SARS-CoV-2 entry into the CNS. Moreover, proteins like P2X7 and Panx-1 may contribute to the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Additionally, the role of the immune system in the gravity of COVID-19 has been investigated with respect to both innate and adaptive immune responses caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection, which can lead to a cytokine storm, tissue damage, and neurological manifestations. A redox imbalance has also been linked to the pathogenesis of COVID-19, potentially causing mitochondrial dysfunction, and generating proinflammatory cytokines. This review summarizes different mechanisms of reactive oxygen species and neuro-inflammation that may contribute to the development of severe COVID-19, and recent progress in the study of immunological events and redox imbalance in neurological complications of COVID-19, and the role of bioinformatics in the study of neurological implications of COVID-19.
Similar content being viewed by others
Facts
-
1.
COVID-19 can have long-term neurological complications.
-
2.
Patients with COVID-19 have higher levels of free radicals in their brains, which can affect brain cells including neurons and glia.
-
3.
The redox imbalance during COVID-19 can affect brain cells.
-
4.
Immunological response during COVID-19 can affect brain cells.
Open Questions
-
1.
Does redox imbalance affect the polarity of microglia in brain?
-
2.
How the redox imbalance affect the immune response and vice-versa during COVID-19 infection?
-
3.
Can the redox imbalance be miniaturized in the form of an organ-on-a-chip?
-
4.
Can the integration of machine learning with advanced bioengineering tools like 3D bioprinting, facilitate the identification of novel therapeutic target for COVID-19?
Introduction
2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an extremely transmissible disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection [1]. The virus is thought to have originated in Wuhan city of China, in December 2019, followed by a massive outbreak causing a global pandemic [2]. In general, coronaviruses encompass a diverse set of viruses capable of infecting different animals, resulting in mild to severe infections in human respiratory systems. Previously, two other coronaviruses, namely, SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), surfaced in the years 2002 and 2012 respectively, leading to a lethal respiratory diseases in humans [3]. Unfortunately, the present COVID-19 pandemic due to SARS-CoV-2 has devastatingly surpassed both SARS and MERS in terms of the number of infections and deaths, imposing an astonishing threat to the worldwide public health condition [4, 5]. As per current reports, more than 767 million COVID-19 confirmed cases have been registered, with more than 6.9 million deaths (statistics as of 4:01 pm CEST, 5th July 2023, at https://covid19.who.int/). During SARS-CoV-2 infection, the body’s immune system is significantly affected, which can be attributed to either unsuccessful viral clearance, followed by a devastating “cytokine storm”, leading to systemic inflammation and damage of body organs, which may include coagulopathy and/or hemoglobinopathy [6]. The major symptoms of COVID-19 include fever, dry cough, dyspnea, and eventually leading to death owing to severe conditions such as respiratory failure and myocardial damage, shock, or kidney collapse [7]. Beyond the common prevailing symptoms, emerging neurological complications in COVID-19 patients have gained large attention of biomedical researchers, particularly neuroscientists, and medical practitioners [8,9,10,11].
The extreme contagious ability of SARS-CoV-2 has been attributed to the differences in various amino acids in Spike 2 (S2) protein compared to the SARS-CoV [12]. Notably, the receptor of SARS-CoV-2; angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2), is also expressed in nervous tissue in addition to the respiratory tract [13,14,15]. Additional surface receptors, CD147, TMPRSS2, and NRP1 have been found to be the receptors facilitating the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into the central nervous system (CNS) [16,17,18]. For the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into host cells via ACE2, the virus surface spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor via its receptor-binding domain (RBD) [19]. CD147 facilitates the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into the host cells through endocytosis [16]. The entry of SARS-CoV-2 via TMPRSS2 can be through two different pathways: pH-dependent or independent. In addition, the expression pattern of proteases in host cells was found to be crucial for segregating SARS-CoV-2 into either pathway. Interestingly, SARS-CoV-2 employs a rapid pH-independent pathway to enter and infect cells in the presence of TMPRSS2. Whereas in the absence of TMPRSS2, SARS-CoV-2 depends on a relatively slow acid-actuated late endosomal pathway for infecting the cells. In addition, endosomal acidification is necessary for the priming of endo-lysosomal proteases to facilitate viral fusion through TMPRSS2 [20]. The expression of NRP1 has also been found to be a novel entry mediator for SARS-CoV-2 infection, which is known for binding furin-cleaved substrates, augmenting the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 through direct binding of the furin-cleaved S1 fragment of the spike protein to NRP1 on the cell surface [18]. Nevertheless, the expression of major receptors (ACE2, CD147, TMPRSS2, NRP1), facilitating the entry of SARS-CoV-2 in host cells in the nervous tissues indicates their potential role in brain invasion [21, 22]. Recently, many other proteins have been found to be associated with COVID-19 neuropathology, e.g., P2X7. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 infection induces the augmentation of extracellular ATP levels, which stimulates the hyperactivation of P2X7 receptors, leading to the stimulation of NLRP3 inflammasome, a major facilitator of neuro-invasion, as found in neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders [23]. Another receptor, Pannexin-1 (Panx-1), has been found to be critical for COVID-19 pathogenesis. The opening of Panx-1 was found to be dependent on ACE2/furin/endocytosis, inducing inflammation in various pathological conditions including neurodegeneration [24]. Major neurodegenerative diseases include Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [25,26,27,28,29,30,31].
Interestingly, the inability for spontaneous breathing in COVID-19 patients with the need for intensive care further indicates the loss of involuntary control of breathing in the CNS, causing respiratory insufficiency [32,33,34]. A severe SARS-CoV-2 infection has also been associated with dysregulation of the immune system [35]. Major research showed that immune responses play a crucial role in the severity of pathogenesis of COVID-19 [36,37,38]. The infection with SARS-CoV-2 can trigger innate and adaptive immune responses. After viral infection, uncontrolled inflammatory innate responses and compromised adaptive immune responses may cause tissue damage locally as well as systemically [39,40,41]. The outcome of SARS-CoV-2-induced cytokine storm has been reported to be linked to neurological manifestations [42]. Besides the immunological landscape, redox imbalance has also been found to be involved in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Various studies have shown the involvement of redox imbalance in COVID-19, which is also common in many other viral infections [43, 44]. For instance, the level of serum thiols decreases in COVID-19 patients. Moreover, the SARS-CoV-2 induces mitochondrial dysfunction and produces proinflammatory cytokines through the accumulation of superoxide anions (O2.-), reactive oxygen species (ROS), and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) [45, 46]. A research result using gene set enrichment analyses showed increase in pathways related to oxidants, and biochemical tests revealed a notable rise in free ROS and drops in uric acid levels for COVID-19 patients. Multivariate analyses found that serum levels of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 were positively associated with one another, and a decrease in the abundance of single electron oxidants was linked with mortality risk in people with coronavirus. Additionally, IL-17c and TSLP levels could predict the need for intensive care in COVID-19 patients [47]. Moreover, mitochondrial dysfunction is a common feature of viral infections and may contribute to immune system dysfunction. ACE2, which cleaves angiotensin II, plays a vital role in maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis. COVID-19 may downregulate ACE2, impacting mitochondrial function and immune function. ACE2 is under-expressed in chronic diseases, which may explain the higher mortality rate in patients with comorbidities. Mitochondrial dysfunction is also found to be independent of ACE2 expression, suggesting it is a significant factor in COVID-19 disease progression [48]. Therefore, understanding redox imbalance as the molecular underpinnings of COVID-19 can aid in the development of novel therapeutic interventions.
In this review, we are discussing the major neurological complications emerging from COVID-19, the participation of the immunological landscape, and the redox imbalance in the neurological implications of COVID-19. Eventually, the application of bioinformatics for deciphering various molecular targets has also been elaborated.
Neurological complications in COVID-19
Owing to the mutational character of SARS-CoV-2, and its ability to enter different organs, SARS-CoV-2 could spread and propagate by various means throughout the body [49]. Interestingly, the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into the brain is quite astonishing due to its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), a semi-permeable protective layer around the brain; composed of endothelial cells, astrocytes, and pericytes [50]. Zhang et al. have demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 can cross BBB through the disruption of the basement membrane without the alteration of the tight junction [51]. In another study by Rhea et al., it was found that the intravenously injected radio-iodinated S1 subunit of its spike protein (I-S1) readily crossed the BBB in mice, was taken up by brain regions, and entered the parenchymal brain space. I-S1 was also taken up by the lung, spleen, kidney, and liver. Importantly, intranasally administered I-S1 also entered the brain, although at levels roughly ten times lower than intravenous administration. Mechanistic studies showed that I-S1 crosses the blood-brain barrier by adsorptive transcytosis and that murine ACE2 is involved in brain and lung uptake, but not in kidney, liver, or spleen [52] (Fig. 1). Subsequently, along with a wide range of symptoms, the appearance of neurological symptoms includes anosmia (partial or full loss of smell), agnosia (inability to interpret sensations), stroke, paralysis, cranial nerve deficits, delirium, encephalopathy, meningitis, and seizures are apparent during the COVID-19 disease progression and its therapy [53, 54]. It is believed that the systemic response against infection is key to several neurological complications in COVID-19. These distinct mechanisms may include systemic dysfunction-induced neurologic injury, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) dysfunction, immune dysfunction, and direct viral invasion of the nervous system, as elaborated and summarized in Table 1 [55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71] and Fig. 2, respectively.
Effects of COVID-19 on smell and taste
One of the prominent early symptoms of COVID-19 is anosmia (loss of smell) and dysgeusia (taste impairment), which affects most COVID-19 patients [72]. A meta-analysis of 83 studies was performed over 27,000 patients of which 48 percent (95% CI 41.2–54.5) displayed olfactory dysfunction [73]. The initial appearance of COVID-19 might lead to these symptoms without the presence of nasal congestion or discharge, although these are rarely the only clinical manifestations of COVID-19. Patients with COVID-19 showed a disruption of one or both olfactory when examined with MRI screening, showing an abnormal signal. Inflammatory infiltrate and axonal injury in the olfactory tract were found in two autopsy cases, however, it is not known whether this damage was caused by the virus or not. The recovery time of olfactory function can be variable. For instance, 33% of patients in one cohort recovered in 8 days, and in the other cohort of patients from Italy 83% fully recovered in 37 days post the beginning of the symptoms. In addition, 51 patients with anosmia healed in four (84%) to eight months (96%) after the symptom onset. In some cases, anosmia and dysgeusia can last for more than several months and can be accompanied by other viral infections [72, 74,75,76].
Encephalopathy
COVID-19 related encephalopathy might also be dependent on other viral infections or factors. Cytokine storm and neurotropism induce an intense inflammatory response, thus altering metabolism or hypoxia, leading to a global dysfunction in the brain. The key symptoms of altered consciousness are delirium, mild confusion, and deep coma. Several case reports confirm the presence of the virus in the cerebrospinal fluid. COVID-19 patients with encephalopathy should be supported with supplemental oxygen therapy and immune modulators, which are supposed to improve the symptoms [53, 77, 78].
Cardiovascular diseases in COVID-19
COVID-19 related cerebrovascular risk factors are cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, advanced age, and history of stroke. One of the proposed mechanisms of COVID-19-related cerebrovascular risk is that: SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE2 receptors, resulting in the inactivation of these receptors. This phenomenon promotes the post-ischemic inflammation cascade, which disrupts perfusion in the ischemic zone, and leads to the development of a larger infarct volume in the case of ischemic stroke (IS). Impaired ACE2 function by COVID-19 can also cause hypertensive peaks and impairment of cerebrovascular endothelium. COVID-19 can also indirectly cause cardio-embolism and IS by causing myocardial ischemia or cardiac arrhythmias [79, 80]. It was found that people with existing cardiac diseases (coronary heart disease, heart failure, stroke), cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., age, hypertension, diabetes) and other comorbid conditions (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic renal failure, cancer) are more likely to experience more severe cases of COVID-19 and have higher mortality rates [81].
Recent research reported that after the initial 30 days of infection with COVID-19, individuals are at an increased risk of developing cardiovascular diseases, including stroke, heart rhythm issues, ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease, pericarditis, myocarditis, heart failure and coagulation issues. This risk and burden exist even for those who did not require inpatient care during the first episode and increases along with the intensity of care required. It is clear that those living through COVID-19 have an increased risk of cardiovascular issues in the year following infection. For these people, healthcare providers should include plans and treatments for cardiovascular health and treatment to address any issues that come up [82]. On the contrary, a meta-analysis findings point towards hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases possibly being independently linked to the development of severe COVID-19, and that age and gender may be useful in predicting the risk of experiencing severe symptoms of the disease. Although it should be noted that potential confounding variables may come into play, the results do suggest that these factors might be significant [83]. Apparently, there is still a room for further investigation to examine the potential contribution of cardiovascular diseases into the severity of COVID-19.
Significance of immune landscape in COVID-19
Immune response in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients varies, for example, asymptomatic patients are found to show weaker antiviral response [84], whereas the symptomatic patients show a swift fall in peripheral lymphocytes and a rise in neutrophils, and monocytes, causing an abnormal immune response, or immune disorders [85, 86]. It is noteworthy that some patients show relapse due to weak virus-eliminating immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 [87]. Critically ill patients develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and multiple organ failure because of the stronger immune response [88]. Interestingly, the body’s natural defense against viral infections involves a quick and well-coordinated immune response, which can also affect the adaptive immune response against foreign and self-antigens. Pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 pneumonia involves a dysregulated autoimmune response, causing cytokine storms leading to poor prognosis [89]. Therefore, the effect of viruses on the immune system can help us in the prevention and treatment of such a pandemic. In asymptomatic patients, i.e., patients only have qRT-PCR specific for the disease, there is a specific mild immune response which eventually leads to the rapid disappearance of the neutralizing antibodies [90]. Specific T-cell response is similar in asymptomatic and symptomatic cases with high levels of IFN-γ and IL-2 in asymptomatic patients. A highly functionalized viral-specific immune response may be triggered due to weak antiviral immunity leading to the proportional secretion of IL-10 and proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-ɑ, occurring disproportionately in symptomatic cases [91]. Reinfection usually occurs after 4-5 months and does not always lead to new positive tests. CD4+ and CD8 + T-cells are found in the recovered patients which produce spike proteins, nucleocapsids, proteins, and membrane proteins. Antibodies produced during the previous infection are not detectable during reinfection and whether the mutation of the spike protein causes reinfection, is not certain. However, during the early stages of reinfection, high-affinity IgG and high titer antibodies produce a stronger antibody response and the absence of IgM is associated with reinfection [92,93,94,95,96].
Abnormal inflammation and immune response of SARS-CoV-2 infection require increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines like IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, IL-17, G-CSF, IP-10, MCP1, MIP1ɑ, TNF, C- reactive protein and D-dimer, which produce cytokine storm, further causing local or systemic tissue damage [97]. Excess levels of dimer and cellulose cause extensive capillary coagulation reactions leading to inflammation and blood clots in the lungs, heart, kidney, nervous system, bone marrow, and vessels. The prokaryotes can infect respiratory systems, kidneys, and gastrointestinal tract in a number larger than immune cells like- macrophages, monocytes, lymphocytes (mostly CD4 + T-cells), eosinophils, and neutrophils [98]. The damage to the lungs includes hyaline membrane formation, fibrin exudate, epithelial damage, and diffuse type- II lung cell hyperplasia. Lesions in alveoli include diffuse alveolar damage, fibrin membrane, and fibrin clump formation. Moreover, inflammation and microthrombus can be found around heart capillaries, liver sinuses, and renal tubules [99, 100].
Notably, SARS-CoV-2 infection can increase the level of IL-1ɑ and IL-6 and decrease that of Th2 cells, Th17 cells, and Treg, which causes CD4 + , CD8 + T-cells, and activated CD4 + T-cells exhaustion i.e., lymphopenia. This leads to the production of CD4 + T-cells, CD8 + T-cells, B-cells, and NK-cells with the damage to CD8 + T-cells being more significant [101]. During recovery from COVID-19, the levels of Treg, activated CD4 + T-cells, and depleted CD8 + T-cells are reduced and that of B-cells is found to be increased. During the end phase of recovery, the levels of IL-1ɑ, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-ɑ decreases [102]. After recovery the levels of IL-10 increases, the frequency of Th1, Th2 and Th17 cells increases, and that of B-cell decreases [103]. The level of lymphocytes signifies that in recovered patients, despite improved immunity, SARS- CoV-2 can cause long-term damage to the immune system. IL-6, IL-10, TNF, neutrophils, and dendritic cells cause lymphopenia [104]. Excessive activation of T-cells or expression of proapoptotic molecules promotes the depletion of T-cells. CD4+ and CD8 + T-cells infiltrate interstitial spaces around wider bronchioles and blood vessels. However, programmed cell death protein-1(PD-1) and PD-L1 protein are not detected on the surface of lymphocytes and no viral infection is detected in lymphocytes and mesenchymal cells. Moreover, S-protein was not found together with T-cells [105, 106].
It is believed that damage to lymphocytes by oxidative stress can initiate lymphopenia. CD4+ and CD8 + T-cells and macrophages infiltrate the interstitial myocardium without damaging myocardiocytes. Myocardial fibres undergo hypertrophy. Iron catalysed regulatory cell death occurs due to the extreme peroxidation of fatty acids. Myocarditis is lymphocytic inflammation including massive CD20 + B-cells, CD3 + T-cells, CD68+ macrophages without eosinophils, giant cells, or granulomas. Moreover, fibroblasts/macrophages promote myocardial destruction [107,108,109]. Despite the pathogen eradicating role of macrophages, it has also been reported to produce cytokines, enzymes, and ROS, therefore generating cytokine storms. Due to pneumonia, the alveolar cavity decreases along with the presence of many atypical and massive CD61+ megakaryocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes. CD68+ macrophages possess intracytoplasmic phagocytosis, eosinophilic hyaloplasm, or hemophagocytic and multinucleated giant cells. Alveolar macrophages secrete IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-ɑ. Pulmonary inflammatory macrophages produce interferon in the early stage, while continuous production of IFN-γ causes extravagant macrophage activation [110,111,112]. Additionally, SARS-CoV-2 viruses infect monocytes which differentiate into tissue macrophages and replicate in their cytoplasm. COVID-19-specific antibodies combine with FcR and enhance virus uptake by macrophages. ACE2 receptor expressed on the surface of lung macrophages interacts with S-protein and allows the SARS-CoV-2 virus to enter the macrophage. S-protein can also interact with ACE2 present on CD68 and CD169 macrophages in the spleen’s marginal area and marginal sinuses of lymph nodes, which upregulates IL-6 production by macrophages. Alveolar macrophages also express PD-L1 [106, 111, 113].
Therefore, it is apparent that CD169 macrophages, like Trojan horse, facilitate viral transmission, excessive inflammation, and activation-induced lymphocyte death [114]. Interestingly, MERS-CoV infects and colonizes phagocytes, replicates, and attenuates innate immunity in the host [115]. Mycobacterium tuberculosis & silica sand are swallowed by phagocytes, which rupture lysosomes to release hydrolase and promotes inflammation, eventually leading to the death of phagocytes. This produces severe inflammation and fibrosis like one produced by SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia [116,117,118,119]. It is noteworthy that nervous system inflammation in COVID-19 patients may or may not be because of viral infection. Severe neurological diseases show lymphocytes or mononuclear inflammatory infiltration in meningeal and cortical tissue producing neurovascular brain injury or microvascular dysfunction. CSF of patients with encephalitis, meningitis, or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis have negative RT-PCR. Only RT-PCR of CSF from patients with epilepsy was found to be positive. CSF analysis of patients with neuromuscular disease shows dissociated cytology of albumin [120,121,122].
SARS-CoV-2 virus releases ROS, which produce oxidative stress injury. T and B cells and NK cells encounter antigens on the virus surface, get stimulated, and later undergo apoptosis due to oxidative stress, therefore decreasing lymphocytes [102]. If infected, phagocytes capture near odour and taste cells, the virus causes oxidative stress damage to the cells, leading to odour and taste disorders. If the rupture is near the meningeal space, the virus produces oxidative stress damage to the cerebral cortex and induces brain inflammation. Nervous system of patients with epilepsy suffers severe damage because phagocytes rupture after penetrating the spinal cord tissue and invade the spinal fluid which further enters CSF.
Importantly, SARS-CoV-2 is an acidophilic anaerobic virus. According to haem theory, it suppresses haem metabolism by dissociating haemoglobin into haem and hunting porphyrin for iron. E-protein has iron-linked sites which possess catalytic properties like cytochrome C oxidase which captures iron, and generates ROS to damage the immune system, therefore producing high infectivity. If these sites had iron catalytic dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase, it could produce ROS like O-, H2O2 or OH. Peroxidase can produce hydroxyl radicals which can damage cell membrane proteins & nucleic acids. This can initiate peroxidation and rupture of lysosomal membranes [123, 124], signifying their crucial role of immune landscape in COVID-19.
Role of redox imbalance in neurological implications of COVID-19
Many glycosylated Spike proteins cover the surface of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which fuses with the lung cell membrane and binds to the ACE2 in the respiratory tract [15, 17]. Apart from its role in SARS-CoV-2, ACE2 is well known for its role in hypertension. The enzyme exerts its function through cleaving angiotensin I (Ang I) or angiotensin II (Ang II) into inactive peptides Ang (1-9), and Ang (1-7) respectively. Ang (1-7) is a vasodilator and hence counteracts the vasoconstrictor effects of the ACE-Ang II axis [125]. The activity of ACE2 is vital for host entry and subsequent pathogenesis. SARS-CoV-2 infection abates the ACE2 receptor, which increases the cellular concentration of angiotensin resulting in an elevated level of oxidants, oxidative stress, and inflammation [126,127,128]. ACE2 deficiency has also been associated with increased NADPH oxidase 2 (Nox2) mediated oxidant formation, resulting in oxidative stress and thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients [129, 130]. Interestingly, Nox can also be activated by the release of TNF-α during the proinflammatory cytokine storm, contributing to local oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction [131]. Moreover, in biopsies obtained from COVID-19 patients, suppression of nuclear factor erythroid2 related factor 2 (NRF2) antioxidant gene was observed. The report further showed that treatment of cells with NRF2 agonists induced a strong antiviral response, pointing to the potential role of Nrf2 in the COVID-19 management [132].
The activation of AngII/AT1R/Nox axis via the generation of ROS, has been found to be associated with mitochondrial injury. The interruption of mitochondrial reduction-oxidation (redox) homeostasis, and an increase of free radicals have been linked to abnormal function of the RAS. The dysregulation of the RAS system has been linked to a series of pathological conditions due to its effect on the function of mitochondria [133]. Since AngII has been demonstrated to promote ROS generation by increasing Nox activation, it is possible that an increase in Ang II levels is one mechanism responsible for rising mtROS production and consequent endothelial cell pathologies (Fig. 3A) [134]. After NADPH oxidase generates O2, it reacts with NO to make ONOO-, which is toxic to mitochondrial respiratory complexes via tyrosine nitration and cysteine oxidation [133]. Interestingly, humans and other mammals differ in that human macrophages and other cells, when exposed to proinflammatory conditions, cannot express the NOS2 enzyme. As a result, the synthesis of NO is minimal and peroxynitrite’s potential harm cannot be factored in [135], which warrants further investigation. One of the most recognizable signs of mitochondrial dysfunction is the inability of the electron transport chain (ETC) complexes to operate properly, which leads to an increase in oxygen reduction and the consequent formation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) owing to the buildup of electrons that can’t be utilized for ATP synthesis [136,137,138,139,140]. Mutations and DNA damage may also be caused by oxidative changes to DNA sugar-phosphate backbones, which can be induced by O2- generating enzymes like NADPH oxidase and mitochondria. Mitochondrial dysfunction is believed to be induced by ROS damage to mtDNA, which leads to a lack of correct formation of ETC complexes [137, 141, 142]. Moreover, H2O2, a membrane-permeable mtROS, interacts with intracellular iron to form extremely reactive hydroxyl radicals which damage nuclear DNA [143,144,145]. SARS- CoV-2 infection also activates the intrinsic and extrinsic pathway of apoptosis (Fig. 3B) [146, 147]. It activates the caspase 8 which causes the cleavage of Bid to tBid (truncated Bid). The tBid promotes the activation of mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) effector proteins BAX and BAK, which further trigger the recruitment of other caspases to perform apoptosis [148]. It also triggers the release of cytochrome C that activate caspases 9 and triggers the apoptosis [146]. Furthermore, the release of cytochrome C and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) cascade activation has been related to elevated ROS levels. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 infection can destroy lung cells by activating a local immune response mediated by macrophages and monocytes; these cells release cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) into the blood, thus activating T-cells. Other inflammatory pathways activated by Ang II involve the transcriptional nuclear factor NF-kB and the expression of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-1β, and TNFα [149]. In COVID-19 patients, an excessive cytokine release has been documented, which induces an increase in leukocyte recruitment to different body organs leading to multiorgan failure, a phenomenon called cytokine storm syndrome [150]. It is crucial to understand that oxidative stress and inflammation are mutually augmenting each other [151]. Persistent oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation correlated with inflammasome activation, and both cooperatively contributed to disease severity [152].
Overwhelming production of ROS results in local or systemic tissue damage leading to severe COVID-19 infection. Oxidative stress is also known to increase the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and suppress the adaptive immune system [153]. NETosis is the cell death of neutrophils where neutrophils extrude DNA and antimicrobial proteins in the extracellular space, forming a net-like structure that traps and kills invading pathogens [154,155,156]. Elevated release of NETs was reported to occur in severe cases of COVID-19 [157]. Sera from COVID-19 patients revealed increased levels of extracellular DNA and MPO-DNA and citrullinated histone H3, specific markers of NET. The levels of extracellular DNA showed a strong correlation with other markers of inflammation (e.g., C-reactive protein, D-dimer). The levels of both extracellular DNA and MPO-DNA were much higher in patients on mechanical ventilation compared to regular COVID-19 patients. The study interestingly showed that sera from COVID-19 patients triggered NET release from control neutrophils in vitro, indicating that circulating NETs can potentially be used to predict the extent of disease severity. The excessive accumulation of NETs causes damage to the host by inducing proinflammatory mechanisms [158]. NETs instigated immune thrombosis in COVID-19 patients and therefore were suggested as a suitable therapeutic target to mitigate prothrombotic complications in COVID-19 patients [159]. The interaction of SARS-CoV-2 with hemoglobin results in dysregulated iron metabolism and iron-mediated oxidative stress and hyperinflammation. Ferroptosis-regulated cell death through iron is initiated by iron and oxidant-induced lipid peroxidation [160]. Oxidized phospholipid thus in a vicious cycle exacerbates NET formation [161,162,163].
Mitochondria are the primary sources of ROS production in cells; therefore, mitochondrial dysfunction can potentially play a major role in the oxidative stress observed in SARS-CoV-2 viral infection. Recent studies have hypothesized that the cytosolic ROS produced by Nox could trigger the opening of the ATP-sensitive mitochondrial potassium channel, causing the depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane and a burst of the mitochondrial ROS production [164]. Inflammatory response and immune signals trigger intracellular cascades that alter the mitochondrial metabolism [165]. For example, TNF-α and interleukin (IL)-6 impede mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and couple ATP production and trigger the production of mitochondrial ROS in the cell. This leads to mitochondrial dysfunction, which has been found in patients with COVID-19 [166]. The mitochondria-targeted antioxidant SkQ1 (10-(6’-methylplastoquinonyl) Decyltriphenylphosphonium) inhibited ROS production induced by the chemo-attractant fMLP via G-protein coupled receptor. It was concluded that mitochondrial ROS are involved in assembling and activating the multicomponent enzyme complex Nox2, which is the main source of ROS in the neutrophils [167].
Since ROS play a key role in neutrophil activation, it is thus a plausible approach to target agents that could inhibit the damaging activity of neutrophils and reduce their number in inflammatory lesions. Oxidative stress is implicated in the pathophysiology of all factors causing COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 symptoms. ROS triggers inflammation, damages the endothelium, promotes the formation of autoantibodies, and disrupts neurotransmitter assembly. Oxidative stress presumably is an important cause of post-COVID-19 symptoms and thus a driving force in an immuno-endothelial-neurological vicious circle [168].
Application of bioinformatics in the study of neurological implications of COVID-19
Bioinformatics analysis has already played an essential role in multiple aspects of COVID-19 research [169], including genomic epidemiology [170,171,172], host-pathogen interaction [173,174,175,176], vaccine development [177,178,179], and prognosis [180, 181]. Recently, researchers recognized bioinformatics tools as a highly efficient approach to deriving novel insights into the neurological implication of COVID-19. Sepehrinezhad et al. showcased a computational pipeline of drug repurposing with publicly available databases and online tools [182]. They collected gene sets related to COVID-19 and neurological disorder, respectively from GeneWeaver [183]. Combining the 139 shared genes with the functional interaction information from String, they used Cytoscape to construct gene-gene interaction networks and identified a few central genes, such as IL-6, TNF, and AKT, closely related to the neurological manifestation of COVID-19. WebGestalt [184] results showed that polaprezinc, andrographolide, and etanercept can be repurposed to target those genes playing central roles in COVD-19 and neurological disorders. In another study with a similar approach, Rahman et al. [185] studied the interaction between COVID-19 and neurological diseases. They identified related gene sets through differential expression analysis of the transcriptomic profiles of COVID-19 patients and neurological disease patients, respectively. Downstream analysis of the shared differentially expressed genes (DEG) included GO enrichment analysis and interactome analysis, which were like Sepehrinezhad et al.’s work. The difference is that Rahman et al. emphasized the similarity between COVID-19 and neurological diseases. They identified a substantial overlap of DEGs and GO terms between COVID-19 and five neurological diseases, including Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington’s disease, and multiple sclerosis [185].
In another research, a more network-based approach has been adopted [186]. From a list of 332 genes known to interact with COVID-19, the authors selected the target genes and their neighbors from the brain-specific interactome from TissueNet [187]. The resulting subnetwork was named the COVID-19 target network (CTN). Cytoscape was used to identify functional modules and key genes in each module. The spatial-temporal expression analysis of the key genes in each module through BEST (Brain Expression Spatial-Temporal) indicated COVID-19 may induce impairment of sensory systems, memory, and cognition. Drug repurposing analysis of the key genes and genes bridging functional modules identified many FDA-approved drugs, such as fulvestrant, tamoxifen, and calcitriol. Prasad et al. have also investigated the comorbidity of COVID-19 with other brain diseases by constructing disease-disease interaction networks with the Gene ORGANizer database [188]. The resulting network showed that several diseases like ataxia, dysarthria, spasticity, cerebral atrophy, autism, dementia, and stroke were closely related to COVID-19 and are also connected with multiple genes in the brain. In addition to neurological disorders in general, computational researchers have investigated the interaction between COVID-19 and specific neurological diseases. Cen et al. investigated COVID-19-related stroke by identifying hub genes and functional modules in a weighted gene co-expression network [189]. Wang et al. studied how COVID-19 affected Alzheimer’s disease by integrating transcriptomics, epigenomics, and proteomics to perform enrichment analysis and network analysis [190].
Current bioinformatics applications to the neurological manifestations of COVID-19 mainly focused on applying enrichment analysis and network analysis to derive novel biological insights from public data sources. Shared genotypes between COVID-19 and neurological diseases and related targeting drugs have been identified. However, the results across studies are not consistent. Shared genes and suggested drugs are largely different across bioinformatics studies. It may be due to different computational pipelines and different databases. Future biological research is warranted to validate these computational results.
Conclusions and outlook
The emergence of severe COVID-19 cases has led to an increase in neurological complications. Such symptoms include anosmia, agnosia, stroke, paralysis, cranial nerve deficits, delirium, encephalopathy, meningitis, and seizures. Research suggests that such neurological effects of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 are aided by its entry and binding into the CNS through ACE2, NRP1, TMPRSS2 and CD147, receptors. In addition, COVID-19 can also trigger an autoimmune response that damages the nervous system. This can lead to long-term neurological problems, such as fatigue, cognitive impairment, and pain.
The immune landscape in COVID-19 is also important to consider. The virus can evade the immune system by mutating its surface proteins. This makes it difficult for the body to mount an effective response and can lead to more severe disease. In addition, the immune response itself can be harmful, as it can damage the nervous system. Redox imbalance is another factor that may contribute to the neurological complications of COVID-19. Redox imbalance is a condition in which there is an excess of free radicals in the body. Free radicals are unstable molecules that can damage cells and tissues. COVID-19 can lead to redox imbalance, which may contribute to the development of neurological symptoms. Bioinformatics is a rapidly growing field that is being used to study the neurological complications of COVID-19. Bioinformatics can be used to analyse large datasets of patient data, which can help to identify new risk factors and treatment targets. Bioinformatics can also be used to develop new models of the disease, which can help to improve our understanding of how COVID-19 affects the nervous system.
To generate a more comprehensive field of knowledge surrounding the neurological implications of COVID-19, examination of blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples for suggestive markers of inflammation, both systemically and in the CNS, is necessary. In addition, postmortem neuropathological studies of patients who have lost their lives to COVID-19 are needed to assess the potential neurological effects of the virus. Baseline neurological assessments and clinical history recordings of those who have recovered from the virus should also be executed to evaluate their potential exposure to prolonged dormant SARS-CoV-2 and its possible risk of leading to long-term neurological consequences. It is essential that further studies be conducted to craft effective strategies that will help lessen the severity of the disease and ultimately improve the treatment outcomes of those with pre-existing neurological conditions.
References
Lai C-C, Shih T-P, Ko W-C, Tang H-J, Hsueh P-R. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55:105924.
Zhu H, Wei L, Niu P. The novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. Glob Heal Res Policy. 2020;5:6.
Zhu Z, Lian X, Su X, Wu W, Marraro GA, Zeng Y. From SARS and MERS to COVID-19: a brief summary and comparison of severe acute respiratory infections caused by three highly pathogenic human coronaviruses. Respir Res. 2020;21:224.
Wigle DT, Johansen H. Parental smoking and infant morbidity. Can Med Assoc J. 1982;126:1277–8.
Kesaniemi YA, Grundy SM. Lack of effect of tocopherol on plasma lipids and lipoproteins in man. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982;36:224–8.
Henry BM, de Oliveira MHS, Benoit S, Plebani M, Lippi G. Hematologic, biochemical and immune biomarker abnormalities associated with severe illness and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020;58:1021–8.
Sardu C, Gambardella J, Morelli MB, Wang X, Marfella R, Santulli G. Hypertension, thrombosis, kidney failure, and diabetes: is COVID-19 an endothelial disease? A comprehensive evaluation of clinical and basic evidence. J Clin Med. 2020;9:1417.
Patone M, Handunnetthi L, Saatci D, Pan J, Katikireddi SV, Razvi S, et al. Neurological complications after first dose of COVID-19 vaccines and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Med. 2021;27:2144–53.
Taquet M, Geddes JR, Husain M, Luciano S, Harrison PJ. 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8:416–27.
Ahmad I, Rathore FA. Neurological manifestations and complications of COVID-19: a literature review. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;77:8–12.
Rubin R. As their numbers grow, COVID-19 “Long Haulers” Stump Experts. JAMA. 2020;324:1381.
Xia S, Liu M, Wang C, Xu W, Lan Q, Feng S, et al. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion. Cell Res. 2020;30:343–55.
Gowrisankar YV, Clark MA. Angiotensin II regulation of angiotensin-converting enzymes in spontaneously hypertensive rat primary astrocyte cultures. J Neurochem. 2016;138:74–85.
Doobay MF, Talman LS, Obr TD, Tian X, Davisson RL, Lazartigues E. Differential expression of neuronal ACE2 in transgenic mice with overexpression of the brain renin-angiotensin system. Am J Physiol Integr Comp Physiol. 2007;292:R373–81.
Hamming I, Timens W, Bulthuis M, Lely A, Navis G, van Goor H. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J Pathol. 2004;203:631–7.
Wang K, Chen W, Zhang Z, Deng Y, Lian J-Q, Du P, et al. CD147-spike protein is a novel route for SARS-CoV-2 infection to host cells. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5:283.
Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181:271–80.e8.
Cantuti-Castelvetri L, Ojha R, Pedro LD, Djannatian M, Franz J, Kuivanen S, et al. Neuropilin-1 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 cell entry and infectivity. Science (80-). 2020;370:856–60.
Shang J, Wan Y, Luo C, Ye G, Geng Q, Auerbach A, et al. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:11727–34.
Koch J, Uckeley ZM, Doldan P, Stanifer M, Boulant S, Lozach P. TMPRSS2 expression dictates the entry route used by SARS‐CoV‐2 to infect host cells. EMBO J. 2021; 40. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2021107821.
Chen R, Wang K, Yu J, Howard D, French L, Chen Z et al. The spatial and cell-type distribution of SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 in the human and mouse brains. Front Neurol. 2021; 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.573095.
Zalpoor H, Akbari A, Samei A, Forghaniesfidvajani R, Kamali M, Afzalnia A, et al. The roles of Eph receptors, neuropilin-1, P2X7, and CD147 in COVID-19-associated neurodegenerative diseases: inflammasome and JaK inhibitors as potential promising therapies. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2022;27:10.
Ribeiro DE, Oliveira-Giacomelli Á, Glaser T, Arnaud-Sampaio VF, Andrejew R, Dieckmann L, et al. Hyperactivation of P2X7 receptors as a culprit of COVID-19 neuropathology. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:1044–59.
Orellana JA, Froger N, Ezan P, Jiang JX, Bennett MVL, Naus CC, et al. ATP and glutamate released via astroglial connexin 43 hemichannels mediate neuronal death through activation of pannexin 1 hemichannels. J Neurochem. 2011;118:826–40.
Rahman MM, Islam MR, Akash S, Harun-Or-Rashid M, Ray TK, Rahaman MS, et al. Recent advancements of nanoparticles application in cancer and neurodegenerative disorders: at a glance. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;153:113305.
Rauf A, Badoni H, Abu-Izneid T, Olatunde A, Rahman MM, Painuli S, et al. Neuroinflammatory markers: key indicators in the pathology of neurodegenerative diseases. Molecules. 2022;27:3194.
Rahman MM, Mim SA, Islam MR, Sultana N, Ahmed M, Kamal MA. Role of G-proteins and GPCR-mediated signalling in neuropathophysiology. CNS Neurol Disord - Drug Targets 2022; 21. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871527321666220430142722.
Rahman MM, Bibi S, Rahaman MS, Rahman F, Islam F, Khan MS, et al. Natural therapeutics and nutraceuticals for lung diseases: traditional significance, phytochemistry, and pharmacology. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;150:113041.
Rahman MM, Islam F, Parvez A, Azad MAK, Ashraf GM, Ullah MF, et al. Citrus limon L. (lemon) seed extract shows neuro-modulatory activity in an in vivo thiopental-sodium sleep model by reducing the sleep onset and enhancing the sleep duration. J Integr Neurosci. 2022;21:042.
Bhattacharya T, Soares GABe, Chopra H, Rahman MM, Hasan Z, Swain SS, et al. Applications of Phyto-Nanotechnology for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Disorders. Mater (Basel). 2022;15:804.
Rahman M, Islam M, Islam M, Harun-Or-Rashid M, Islam M, Abdullah S, et al. Stem cell transplantation therapy and neurological disorders: current status and future perspectives. Biol (Basel). 2022;11:147.
Baig AM. Computing the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on respiration regulatory mechanisms in COVID-19. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020;11:2416–21.
Septyaningtrias DE, Susilowati R. Neurological involvement of COVID-19: from neuroinvasion and neuroimmune crosstalk to long-term consequences. Rev Neurosci. 2021;32:427–42.
Albaiceta GM, Brochard L, Dos Santos CC, Fernández R, Georgopoulos D, Girard T, et al. The central nervous system during lung injury and mechanical ventilation: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth. 2021;127:648–59.
Bhatt PJ, Shiau S, Brunetti L, Xie Y, Solanki K, Khalid S, et al. Risk factors and outcomes of hospitalized patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and secondary bloodstream infections: a multicenter case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72:e995–e1003.
Tahaghoghi-Hajghorbani S, Zafari P, Masoumi E, Rajabinejad M, Jafari-Shakib R, Hasani B, et al. The role of dysregulated immune responses in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Virus Res. 2020;290:198197.
Séror C, Melki M-T, Subra F, Raza SQ, Bras M, Saïdi H, et al. Extracellular ATP acts on P2Y2 purinergic receptors to facilitate HIV-1 infection. J Exp Med. 2011;208:1823–34.
Velasquez S, Malik S, Lutz SE, Scemes E, Eugenin EA. Pannexin1 channels are required for chemokine-mediated migration of CD4 + T lymphocytes: role in inflammation and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2016;196:4338–47.
Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Netea MG, Rovina N, Akinosoglou K, Antoniadou A, Antonakos N, et al. Complex immune dysregulation in COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27:992–1000.e3.
Cui Y, Tian M, Huang D, Wang X, Huang Y, Fan L, et al. A 55-day-old female infant infected with 2019 novel coronavirus disease: presenting with pneumonia, liver injury, and heart damage. J Infect Dis. 2020;221:1775–81.
Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Huang L, Zhang C, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:420–2.
Isacson O. The consequences of coronavirus-induced cytokine storm are associated with neurological diseases, which may be preventable. Front Neurol. 2020; 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00745.
Khomich O, Kochetkov S, Bartosch B, Ivanov A. Redox biology of respiratory viral infections. Viruses. 2018;10:392.
Chernyak BV, Popova EN, Prikhodko AS, Grebenchikov OA, Zinovkina LA, Zinovkin RA. COVID-19 and Oxidative Stress. Biochem. 2020;85:1543–53.
Silvagno F, Vernone A, Pescarmona GP. The Role of Glutathione in Protecting against the Severe Inflammatory Response Triggered by COVID-19. Antioxidants. 2020;9:624.
Paul BD, Lemle MD, Komaroff AL, Snyder SH Redox imbalance links COVID-19 and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2021; 118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024358118.
Majumder N, Deepak V, Hadique S, Aesoph D, Velayutham M, Ye Q, et al. Redox imbalance in COVID-19 pathophysiology. Redox Biol. 2022;56:102465.
Kaundal RK, Kalvala AK, Kumar A. Neurological implications of COVID-19: role of redox imbalance and mitochondrial dysfunction. Mol Neurobiol. 2021;58:4575–87.
Hu B, Guo H, Zhou P, Shi Z-L. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19:141–54.
Erickson MA, Rhea EM, Knopp RC, Banks WA. Interactions of SARS-CoV-2 with the blood–brain barrier. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:2681.
Zhang L, Zhou L, Bao L, Liu J, Zhu H, Lv Q, et al. SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood–brain barrier accompanied with basement membrane disruption without tight junctions alteration. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:337.
Rhea EM, Logsdon AF, Hansen KM, Williams LM, Reed MJ, Baumann KK, et al. The S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood–brain barrier in mice. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24:368–78.
Liotta EM, Batra A, Clark JR, Shlobin NA, Hoffman SC, Orban ZS, et al. Frequent neurologic manifestations and encephalopathy-associated morbidity in Covid-19 patients. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020;7:2221–30.
Pezzini A, Padovani A. Lifting the mask on neurological manifestations of COVID-19. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16:636–44.
Kanberg N, Ashton NJ, Andersson L-M, Yilmaz A, Lindh M, Nilsson S, et al. Neurochemical evidence of astrocytic and neuronal injury commonly found in COVID-19. Neurology. 2020;95:e1754–59.
Thakur KT, Miller EH, Glendinning MD, Al-Dalahmah O, Banu MA, Boehme AK, et al. COVID-19 neuropathology at Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital. Brain. 2021;144:2696–708.
Solomon IH, Normandin E, Bhattacharyya S, Mukerji SS, Keller K, Ali AS, et al. Neuropathological features of Covid-19. N. Engl J Med. 2020;383:989–92.
Kandemirli SG, Dogan L, Sarikaya ZT, Kara S, Akinci C, Kaya D, et al. Brain MRI findings in patients in the intensive care unit with COVID-19 infection. Radiology. 2020;297:E232–5.
Radmanesh A, Derman A, Lui YW, Raz E, Loh JP, Hagiwara M, et al. COVID-19–associated diffuse leukoencephalopathy and microhemorrhages. Radiology. 2020;297:E223–7.
Agarwal S, Jain R, Dogra S, Krieger P, Lewis A, Nguyen V, et al. Cerebral microbleeds and leukoencephalopathy in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Stroke. 2020;51:2649–55.
Lei Y, Zhang J, Schiavon CR, He M, Chen L, Shen H, et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein impairs endothelial function via downregulation of ACE 2. Circ Res. 2021;128:1323–6.
Strawn WB, Ferrario CM, Tallant EA. Angiotensin-(1-7) reduces smooth muscle growth after vascular injury. Hypertens (Dallas, Tex 1979). 1999;33:207–11.
Ye M, Wysocki J, William J, Soler MJ, Cokic I, Batlle D. Glomerular localization and expression of Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and Angiotensin-converting enzyme: implications for albuminuria in diabetes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:3067–75.
Pilotto A, Padovani A. Reply to the Letter “COVID‐19‐Associated Encephalopathy and Cytokine‐Mediated Neuroinflammation”. Ann Neurol. 2020;88:861–2.
Muccioli L, Pensato U, Cani I, Guarino M, Cortelli P, Bisulli F. COVID‐19–associated encephalopathy and cytokine‐mediated neuroinflammation. Ann Neurol. 2020;88:860–1.
Channappanavar R, Perlman S. Pathogenic human coronavirus infections: causes and consequences of cytokine storm and immunopathology. Semin Immunopathol. 2017;39:529–39.
Huang K-J, Su I-J, Theron M, Wu Y-C, Lai S-K, Liu C-C, et al. An interferon-?-related cytokine storm in SARS patients. J Med Virol. 2005;75:185–94.
Al-Dalahmah O, Thakur KT, Nordvig AS, Prust ML, Roth W, Lignelli A, et al. Neuronophagia and microglial nodules in a SARS-CoV-2 patient with cerebellar hemorrhage. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2020;8:147.
Matschke J, Lütgehetmann M, Hagel C, Sperhake JP, Schröder AS, Edler C, et al. Neuropathology of patients with COVID-19 in Germany: a post-mortem case series. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:919–29.
Meinhardt J, Radke J, Dittmayer C, Franz J, Thomas C, Mothes R, et al. Olfactory transmucosal SARS-CoV-2 invasion as a port of central nervous system entry in individuals with COVID-19. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24:168–75.
Song E, Zhang C, Israelow B, Lu-Culligan A, Prado AV, Skriabine S, et al. Neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 in human and mouse brain. bioRxiv Prepr Serv Biol 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.25.169946.
Lechien JR, Chiesa-Estomba CM, De Siati DR, Horoi M, Le Bon SD, Rodriguez A, et al. Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions as a clinical presentation of mild-to-moderate forms of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a multicenter European study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277:2251–61.
Saniasiaya J, Islam MA, Abdullah B. Prevalence of Olfactory Dysfunction in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): a Meta-analysis of 27,492 Patients. Laryngoscope. 2021;131:865–78.
Paderno A, Mattavelli D, Rampinelli V, Grammatica A, Raffetti E, Tomasoni M, et al. Olfactory and gustatory outcomes in COVID-19: A Prospective Evaluation In Nonhospitalized Subjects. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;163:1144–9.
Augustin M, Schommers P, Stecher M, Dewald F, Gieselmann L, Gruell H, et al. Post-COVID syndrome in non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a longitudinal prospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Heal Eur. 2021;6:100122.
Renaud M, Thibault C, Le Normand F, Mcdonald EG, Gallix B, Debry C, et al. Clinical outcomes for patients with anosmia 1 year after COVID-19 diagnosis. JAMA Netw open. 2021;4:e2115352.
Pun BT, Badenes R, Heras La Calle G, Orun OM, Chen W, Raman R, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for delirium in critically ill patients with COVID-19 (COVID-D): a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9:239–50.
Kennedy M, Helfand BKI, Gou RY, Gartaganis SL, Webb M, Moccia JM, et al. Delirium in older patients with COVID-19 presenting to the emergency department. JAMA Netw open. 2020;3:e2029540.
Tsivgoulis G, Palaiodimou L, Zand R, Lioutas VA, Krogias C, Katsanos AH, et al. COVID-19 and cerebrovascular diseases: a comprehensive overview. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020;13:175628642097800.
De Michele M, Kahan J, Berto I, Schiavo OG, Iacobucci M, Toni D, et al. Cerebrovascular complications of COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination. Circ Res. 2022;130:1187–203.
Chung MK, Zidar DA, Bristow MR, Cameron SJ, Chan T, Harding CV, et al. COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2021;128:1214–36.
Xie Y, Xu E, Bowe B, Al-Aly Z. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes of COVID-19. Nat Med. 2022;28:583–90.
Matsushita K, Ding N, Kou M, Hu X, Chen M, Gao Y, et al. The relationship of COVID-19 severity with cardiovascular disease and its traditional risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob Heart. 2020;15:64.
Long Q-X, Tang X-J, Shi Q-L, Li Q, Deng H-J, Yuan J, et al. Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nat Med. 2020;26:1200–4.
Sun S, Cai X, Wang H, He G, Lin Y, Lu B, et al. Abnormalities of peripheral blood system in patients with COVID-19 in Wenzhou, China. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;507:174–80.
Qin C, Zhou L, Hu Z, Zhang S, Yang S, Tao Y, et al. Dysregulation of immune response in patients with Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:762–8.
Shi Y, Wang Y, Shao C, Huang J, Gan J, Huang X, et al. COVID-19 infection: the perspectives on immune responses. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27:1451–4.
Yazdanpanah F, Hamblin MR, Rezaei N. The immune system and COVID-19: friend or foe? Life Sci. 2020;256:117900.
Sette A, Crotty S. Adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Cell. 2021;184:861–80.
Yu X, Yang R. COVID‐19 transmission through asymptomatic carriers is a challenge to containment. Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2020;14:474–5.
Le Bert N, Clapham HE, Tan AT, Chia WN, Tham CYL, Lim JM et al. Highly functional virus-specific cellular immune response in asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Exp Med. 2021; 218. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20202617.
Yuan B, Liu H-Q, Yang Z-R, Chen Y-X, Liu Z-Y, Zhang K, et al. Recurrence of positive SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in recovered COVID-19 patients during medical isolation observation. Sci Rep. 2020;10:11887.
Duggan NM, Ludy SM, Shannon BC, Reisner AT, Wilcox SR. Is novel coronavirus 2019 reinfection possible? Interpreting dynamic SARS-CoV-2 test results. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;39:256.e1–3.
Grifoni A, Weiskopf D, Ramirez SI, Mateus J, Dan JM, Moderbacher CR, et al. Targets of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in humans with COVID-19 disease and unexposed individuals. Cell. 2020;181:1489–1501.e15.
To KK-W, Hung IF-N, Ip JD, Chu AW-H, Chan W-M, Tam AR, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) re-infection by a phylogenetically distinct severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 strain confirmed by whole genome sequencing. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73:e2946–51.
To KK-W, Hung IF-N, Chan K-H, Yuan S, To W-K, Tsang DN-C, et al. Serum antibody profile of a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 reinfection. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72:e659–62.
Iba T, Levy JH, Levi M, Thachil J. Coagulopathy in COVID‐19. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18:2103–9.
Yao XH, Li TY, He ZC, Ping YF, Liu HW, Yu SC, et al. A pathological report of three COVID-19 cases by minimal invasive autopsies. Zhonghua bing li xue za zhi = Chinese J Pathol. 2020;49:411–7.
Tian S, Xiong Y, Liu H, Niu L, Guo J, Liao M, et al. Pathological study of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) through postmortem core biopsies. Mod Pathol. 2020;33:1007–14.
Rapkiewicz AV, Mai X, Carsons SE, Pittaluga S, Kleiner DE, Berger JS, et al. Megakaryocytes and platelet-fibrin thrombi characterize multi-organ thrombosis at autopsy in COVID-19: A case series. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;24:100434.
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506.
Sami R, Fathi F, Eskandari N, Ahmadi M, ArefNezhad R, Motedayyen H. Characterizing the immune responses of those who survived or succumbed to COVID-19: Can immunological signatures predict outcome? Cytokine. 2021;140:155439.
Fathi F, Sami R, Mozafarpoor S, Hafezi H, Motedayyen H, Arefnezhad R, et al. Immune system changes during COVID-19 recovery play key role in determining disease severity. Int J Immunopathol Pharm. 2020;34:205873842096649.
Shi N, Ma Y, Fan Y, Wang J, Zhao C, Li G, et al. Predictive Value of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio(NLR) for Diagnosis and Worse Clinical Course of the COVID-19: Findings from Ten Provinces in China. SSRN Electron J 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3569838.
Mathew D, Giles JR, Baxter AE, Oldridge DA, Greenplate AR, Wu JE, et al. Deep immune profiling of COVID-19 patients reveals distinct immunotypes with therapeutic implications. Science (80-) 2020; 369. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc8511.
Wang C, Xie J, Zhao L, Fei X, Zhang H, Tan Y, et al. Alveolar macrophage dysfunction and cytokine storm in the pathogenesis of two severe COVID-19 patients. EBioMedicine. 2020;57:102833.
Jacobs W, Lammens M, Kerckhofs A, Voets E, Van San E, Van Coillie S, et al. Fatal lymphocytic cardiac damage in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19): autopsy reveals a ferroptosis signature. ESC Hear Fail. 2020;7:3772–81.
Basso C, Leone O, Rizzo S, De Gaspari M, van der Wal AC, Aubry M-C, et al. Pathological features of COVID-19-associated myocardial injury: a multicentre cardiovascular pathology study. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:3827–35.
Pagliaro P. Is macrophages heterogeneity important in determining COVID-19 lethality? Med Hypotheses. 2020;143:110073.
Shirai T, Hilhorst M, Harrison DG, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM. Macrophages in vascular inflammation – From atherosclerosis to vasculitis. Autoimmunity. 2015;48:139–51.
Jafarzadeh A, Chauhan P, Saha B, Jafarzadeh S, Nemati M. Contribution of monocytes and macrophages to the local tissue inflammation and cytokine storm in COVID-19: Lessons from SARS and MERS, and potential therapeutic interventions. Life Sci. 2020;257:118102.
Fox SE, Akmatbekov A, Harbert JL, Li G, Quincy Brown J, Vander, et al. Pulmonary and cardiac pathology in African American patients with COVID-19: an autopsy series from New Orleans. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:681–6.
Xu X, Chang XN, Pan HX, Su H, Huang B, Yang M, et al. Pathological changes of the spleen in ten patients with coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) by postmortem needle autopsy. Zhonghua bing li xue za zhi = Chinese J Pathol. 2020;49:576–82.
Park MD. Macrophages: a Trojan horse in COVID-19? Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20:351.
Zhou J, Chu H, Li C, Wong BH-Y, Cheng Z-S, Poon VK-M, et al. Active replication of middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus and aberrant induction of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in human macrophages: implications for pathogenesis. J Infect Dis. 2014;209:1331–42.
Maejima I, Takahashi A, Omori H, Kimura T, Takabatake Y, Saitoh T, et al. Autophagy sequesters damaged lysosomes to control lysosomal biogenesis and kidney injury. EMBO J. 2013;32:2336–47.
Pollard KM. Silica, silicosis, and autoimmunity. Front Immunol. 2016; 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00097.
Goren MB. Phagocyte lysosomes: interactions with infectious agents, phagosomes, and experimental perturbations in function. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1977;31:507–33.
Wong K, Jacobs WR Jr. Critical role for NLRP3 in necrotic death triggered by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Cell Microbiol. 2011;13:1371–84.
Alshebri MS, Alshouimi RA, Alhumidi HA, Alshaya AI. Neurological complications of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and COVID-19. SN Compr Clin Med. 2020;2:2037–47.
Gutierrez Amezcua JM, Jain R, Kleinman G, Muh CR, Guzzetta M, Folkerth R, et al. COVID-19-induced neurovascular injury: a case series with emphasis on pathophysiological mechanisms. SN Compr Clin Med. 2020;2:2109–25.
Ye M, Ren Y, Lv T. Encephalitis as a clinical manifestation of COVID-19. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;88:945–6.
Maher P, Zafar H, Mathews K. Oxyhemoglobin concentrations do not support hemoglobinopathy in COVID-19. Respir Med. 2021;187:106597.
Fong KL, McCay PB, Poyer JL, Keele BB, Misra H. Evidence that peroxidation of lysosomal membranes is initiated by hydroxyl free radicals produced during flavin enzyme activity. J Biol Chem. 1973;248:7792–7.
Ghosal S. The effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on death and severity of disease in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A meta-analysis. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.23.20076661.
Samir D. Oxidative stress associated with SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19) increases the severity of the lung disease - a systematic review. J Infect Dis Epidemiol. 2020; 6. https://doi.org/10.23937/2474-3658/1510121.
Gheblawi M, Wang K, Viveiros A, Nguyen Q, Zhong J-C, Turner AJ, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: SARS-CoV-2 receptor and regulator of the renin-angiotensin system: celebrating the 20th anniversary of the discovery of ACE2. Circ Res. 2020;126:1456–74.
Suhail S, Zajac J, Fossum C, Lowater H, McCracken C, Severson N, et al. Role of oxidative stress on SARS-CoV (SARS) and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection: a review. Protein J. 2020;39:644–56.
Rabelo LA, Alenina N, Bader M. ACE2–angiotensin-(1–7)–Mas axis and oxidative stress in cardiovascular disease. Hypertens Res. 2011;34:154–60.
Wysocki J, Ortiz‐Melo DI, Mattocks NK, Xu K, Prescott J, Evora K, et al. ACE 2 deficiency increases NADPH‐mediated oxidative stress in the kidney. Physiol Rep. 2014;2:e00264.
Blaser H, Dostert C, Mak TW, Brenner D. TNF and ROS crosstalk in inflammation. Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26:249–61.
Olagnier D, Farahani E, Thyrsted J, Blay-Cadanet J, Herengt A, Idorn M, et al. SARS-CoV2-mediated suppression of NRF2-signaling reveals potent antiviral and anti-inflammatory activity of 4-octyl-itaconate and dimethyl fumarate. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1–12.
Vajapey R, Rini D, Walston J, Abadir P. The impact of age-related dysregulation of the angiotensin system on mitochondrial redox balance. Front Physiol. 2014;5:439.
Liang G, Cheng L, Chen X, Li Y, Li X, Guan Y, et al. ClC-3 promotes angiotensin II-induced reactive oxygen species production in endothelial cells by facilitating Nox2 NADPH oxidase complex formation. Acta Pharm Sin. 2018;39:1725–34.
Fang W, Jiang J, Su L, Shu T, Liu H, Lai S, et al. The role of NO in COVID-19 and potential therapeutic strategies. Free Radic Biol Med. 2021;163:153–62.
Pacher P, Beckman JS, Liaudet L. Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2007;87:315–424.
Doughan AK, Harrison DG, Dikalov SI. Molecular mechanisms of angiotensin II–mediated mitochondrial dysfunction. Circ Res. 2008;102:488–96.
Dikalov SI, Nazarewicz RR. Angiotensin II-induced production of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species: potential mechanisms and relevance for cardiovascular disease. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;19:1085–94.
Murphy MP. Mitochondrial dysfunction indirectly elevates ROS production by the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell Metab. 2013;18:145–6.
Korge P, Calmettes G, Weiss JN. Reactive oxygen species production in cardiac mitochondria after complex I inhibition: modulation by substrate-dependent regulation of the NADH/NAD+ ratio. Free Radic Biol Med. 2016;96:22–33.
Li X, Fang P, Mai J, Choi ET, Wang H, Yang X. Targeting mitochondrial reactive oxygen species as novel therapy for inflammatory diseases and cancers. J Hematol Oncol. 2013;6:19.
Ide T, Tsutsui H, Hayashidani S, Kang D, Suematsu N, Nakamura K, et al. Mitochondrial DNA damage and dysfunction associated with oxidative stress in failing hearts after myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2001;88:529–35.
Mello Filho AC, Hoffmann ME, Meneghini R. Cell killing and DNA damage by hydrogen peroxide are mediated by intracellular iron. Biochem J. 1984;218:273–5.
Balasubramanian B, Pogozelski WK, Tullius TD. DNA strand breaking by the hydroxyl radical is governed by the accessible surface areas of the hydrogen atoms of the DNA backbone. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1998;95:9738–43.
Lee S, Tak E, Lee J, Rashid M, Murphy MP, Ha J, et al. Mitochondrial H2O2 generated from electron transport chain complex I stimulates muscle differentiation. Cell Res. 2011;21:817–34.
Ren Y, Shu T, Wu D, Mu J, Wang C, Huang M, et al. The ORF3a protein of SARS-CoV-2 induces apoptosis in cells. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;17:881–3.
Liu Y, Garron TM, Chang Q, Su Z, Zhou C, Qiu Y, et al. Cell-type apoptosis in lung during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Pathogens. 2021;10:509.
Tummers B, Green DR. Caspase-8: regulating life and death. Immunol Rev. 2017;277:76–89.
Tay MZ, Poh CM, Rénia L, MacAry PA, Ng LFP. The trinity of COVID-19: immunity, inflammation and intervention. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20:363–74.
Ruan Q, Yang K, Wang W, Jiang L, Song J. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China (vol 17, pg 851, 2020). Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1294–7.
Jensen IJ, McGonagill PW, Berton RR, Wagner BA, Silva EE, Buettner GR, et al. Prolonged reactive oxygen species production following Septic Insult. ImmunoHorizons. 2021;5:477–88.
Lage SL, Amaral EP, Hilligan KL, Laidlaw E, Rupert A, Namasivayan S, et al. Persistent oxidative stress and inflammasome activation in CD14highCD16−monocytes from COVID-19 Patients. Front Immunol. 2021;12:799558.
Schönrich G, Raftery MJ, Samstag Y. Devilishly radical NETwork in COVID-19: oxidative stress, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and T cell suppression. Adv Biol Regul. 2020;77:100741.
Delgado-Rizo V, Martinez-Guzman MA, Iñiguez-Gutierrez L, García-Orozco A, Alvarado-Navarro A, Fafutis-Morris M. Neutrophil extracellular traps and its implications in inflammation: an overview. Front Immunol. 2017;8:81.
Sorvillo N, Cherpokova D, Martinod K, Wagner DD. Extracellular DNA NET-works with dire consequences for health. Circ Res. 2019;125:470–88.
Yipp BG, Kubes P. NETosis: how vital is it? Blood J Am Soc Hematol. 2013;122:2784–94.
Zuo Y, Yalavarthi S, Shi H, Gockman K, Zuo M, Madison JA, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps in COVID-19. JCI insight. 2020;5:e138999.
Papayannopoulos V. Neutrophil extracellular traps in immunity and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:134–47.
Middleton EA, He X-Y, Denorme F, Campbell RA, Ng D, Salvatore SP, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps contribute to immunothrombosis in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Blood. 2020;136:1169–79.
Bayır H, Anthonymuthu TS, Tyurina YY, Patel SJ, Amoscato AA, Lamade AM, et al. Achieving life through death: redox biology of lipid peroxidation in ferroptosis. Cell Chem Biol. 2020;27:387–408.
Cao J, Chen X, Jiang L, Lu B, Yuan M, Zhu D, et al. DJ-1 suppresses ferroptosis through preserving the activity of S-adenosyl homocysteine hydrolase. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1–15.
Hadian K, Stockwell BR. SnapShot: ferroptosis. Cell. 2020;181:1188.e1.
Yotsumoto S, Muroi Y, Chiba T, Ohmura R, Yoneyama M, Magarisawa M, et al. Hyperoxidation of ether-linked phospholipids accelerates neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–18.
Wen H, Gwathmey JK, Xie L-H. Oxidative stress-mediated effects of angiotensin II in the cardiovascular system. World J Hypertens. 2012;2:34.
Saleh J, Peyssonnaux C, Singh KK, Edeas M. Mitochondria and microbiota dysfunction in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Mitochondrion. 2020;54:1–7.
Jo E-K, Kim JK, Shin D-M, Sasakawa C. Molecular mechanisms regulating NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Cell Mol Immunol. 2016;13:148–59.
Vorobjeva N, Galkin I, Pletjushkina O, Golyshev S, Zinovkin R, Prikhodko A, et al. Mitochondrial permeability transition pore is involved in oxidative burst and NETosis of human neutrophils. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)-Mol Basis Dis. 2020;1866:165664.
Vollbracht C, Kraft K. Feasibility of vitamin C in the treatment of post viral fatigue with focus on long COVID, based on a systematic review of IV vitamin C on fatigue. Nutrients. 2021;13:1154.
Knyazev S, Chhugani K, Sarwal V, Ayyala R, Singh H, Karthikeyan S, et al. Unlocking capacities of genomics for the COVID-19 response and future pandemics. Nat Methods. 2022;19:374–80.
Alteri C, Cento V, Piralla A, Costabile V, Tallarita M, Colagrossi L, et al. Genomic epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 reveals multiple lineages and early spread of SARS-CoV-2 infections in Lombardy, Italy. Nat Commun. 2021;12:434.
Hodcroft EB, De Maio N, Lanfear R, MacCannell DR, Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, et al. Want to track pandemic variants faster? Fix the bioinformatics bottleneck. Nature. 2021;591:30–33.
Dong A, Zhao J, Griffin C, Wu R. The genomic physics of COVID-19 pathogenesis and spread. Cells 2021; 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11010080.
Daniloski Z, Jordan TX, Wessels H-H, Hoagland DA, Kasela S, Legut M, et al. Identification of required host factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection in human. Cells Cell. 2021;184:92–105.e16.
Lin Y-C, Brooks JD, Bull SB, Gagnon F, Greenwood CMT, Hung RJ, et al. Statistical power in COVID-19 case-control host genomic study design. Genome Med. 2020;12:115.
Nambou K, Anakpa M. Deciphering the co-adaptation of codon usage between respiratory coronaviruses and their human host uncovers candidate therapeutics for COVID-19. Infect Genet Evol. 2020;85:104471.
Ostaszewski M, Niarakis A, Mazein A, Kuperstein I, Phair R, Orta-Resendiz A, et al. COVID19 Disease Map, a computational knowledge repository of virus-host interaction mechanisms. Mol Syst Biol. 2021;17:e10387.
Hwang W, Lei W, Katritsis NM, MacMahon M, Chapman K, Han N. Current and prospective computational approaches and challenges for developing COVID-19 vaccines. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;172:249–74.
Oyarzun P, Kashyap M, Fica V, Salas-Burgos A, Gonzalez-Galarza FF, McCabe A, et al. A proteome-wide immunoinformatics tool to accelerate T-cell epitope discovery and vaccine design in the context of emerging infectious diseases: an ethnicity-oriented approach. Front Immunol. 2021;12:598778.
An H, Eun M, Yi J, Park J. CRESSP: a comprehensive pipeline for prediction of immunopathogenic SARS-CoV-2 epitopes using structural properties of proteins. Brief Bioinform. 2022; 23. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbac056.
Lazari LC, Ghilardi FDR, Rosa-Fernandes L, Assis DM, Nicolau JC, Santiago VF, et al. Prognostic accuracy of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric analysis of plasma in COVID-19. Life Sci. Alliance 2021; 4. https://doi.org/10.26508/lsa.202000946.
Fernandes FT, de Oliveira TA, Teixeira CE, Batista AF, de M, Dalla Costa G, et al. A multipurpose machine learning approach to predict COVID-19 negative prognosis in São Paulo, Brazil. Sci Rep. 2021;11:3343.
Sepehrinezhad A, Rezaeitalab F, Shahbazi A, Sahab-Negah S. A computational-based drug repurposing method targeting SARS-CoV-2 and its neurological manifestations genes and signaling pathways. Bioinform Biol Insights. 2021;15:11779322211026728.
Baker E, Bubier JA, Reynolds T, Langston MA, Chesler EJ. GeneWeaver: data driven alignment of cross-species genomics in biology and disease. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D555–9.
Liao Y, Wang J, Jaehnig EJ, Shi Z, Zhang B. WebGestalt 2019: gene set analysis toolkit with revamped UIs and APIs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W199–W205.
Rahman MH, Rana HK, Peng S, Kibria MG, Islam MZ, Mahmud SMH, et al. Bioinformatics and system biology approaches to identify pathophysiological impact of COVID-19 to the progression and severity of neurological diseases. Comput Biol Med. 2021;138:104859.
Prasad K, AlOmar SY, Alqahtani SAM, Malik MZ, Kumar V. Brain disease network analysis to elucidate the neurological manifestations of COVID-19. Mol Neurobiol. 2021;58:1875–93.
Basha O, Barshir R, Sharon M, Lerman E, Kirson BF, Hekselman I, et al. The TissueNet v.2 database: a quantitative view of protein-protein interactions across human tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D427–31.
Gokhman D, Kelman G, Amartely A, Gershon G, Tsur S, Carmel L. Gene ORGANizer: linking genes to the organs they affect. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:W138–45.
Cen G, Liu L, Wang J, Wang X, Chen S, Song Y, et al. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis to identify potential biological processes and key genes in COVID-19-related Stroke. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:4526022.
Wang F, Xu J, Xu S-J, Guo J-J, Wang F, Wang Q.-W. Analysis and identification genetic effect of SARS-CoV-2 infections to Alzheimer’s disease patients by integrated bioinformatics. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;85:729–44.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31802142), and the Doctoral Start-up Fund of Southwest University (SWU120019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AT conceived the initial idea. AT, VS, SA, LL, and NP participated in the preparation of draft. KZ, GK, and AC provided resources. AT and NP prepared the figures. AT and VS revised and edited the manuscript. AT and KZ supervised the overall manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Mauro Piacentini
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Thakur, A., Sharma, V., Averbek, S. et al. Immune landscape and redox imbalance during neurological disorders in COVID-19. Cell Death Dis 14, 593 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06102-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06102-6