Abstract
Cisplatin and other platinum-based anticancer agents are among the most widely used chemotherapy drugs in the treatment of different types of cancer. However, it is common to find patients who respond well to treatment at first but later relapse due to the appearance of resistance to cisplatin. Among the mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon is the increase in DNA damage repair. Here, we elucidate the effect of cisplatin on the MRN (MRE11-RAD50-NBS1) DNA damage sensor complex. We found that the tumor suppressor FBXW7 is a key factor in controlling the turnover of the MRN complex by inducing its degradation through lysosomes. Inhibition of lysosomal enzymes allowed the detection of the association of FBXW7-dependent ubiquitylated MRN with LC3 and the autophagy adaptor p62/SQSTM1 and the localization of MRN in lysosomes. Furthermore, cisplatin-induced cell death increased MRN degradation, suggesting that this complex is one of the targets that favor cell death. These findings open the possibility of using the induction of the degradation of the MRN complex after genotoxic damage as a potential therapeutic strategy to eliminate tumor cells.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cisplatin (CDDP, cis-diamminedichloroplatinum II) is a key drug in the fight against cancer. Since its discovery, it has been widely used in chemotherapy treatments. Currently, platinum-based drugs are used for the treatment of many cancers, including cervical, ovarian, testicular, head and neck, breast, bladder, esophageal, stomach, prostate, and lung cancers [1]. Also, to treat Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas, neuroblastoma, sarcomas, multiple myeloma, melanoma, and mesothelioma [2]. Cisplatin, activated by intracellular hydrolysis of chlorides, binds to DNA to form monoadducts as well as intra- and interstrand DNA cross-links [3]. As a result, it causes inhibition of replication and transcription, arrests the cell cycle, and, since cells cannot repair DNA damage, induces cell death [4]. However, the use of cisplatin is often limited by inherent or acquired chemoresistance, leading to therapeutic failure. This is especially relevant after repeated cycles of therapy, which can enhance the ability to repair DNA damage to avoid cell death. Various mechanisms are involved in the repair of DNA damage caused by cisplatin, such as nucleotide excision repair, homologous recombination (HR), and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), among others [5]. These observations are the basis for the use of repair inhibitors to enhance the therapeutic effects of DNA-damaging drugs [6].
Double-stranded breaks (DSBs) can be recognized by either the MRN (MRE11-RAD50-NBS1) or the KU70/KU80 complexes. Binding of the first complex prepares the breaks for HR repair, while binding of the second leads to NHEJ [7]. The MRN complex is made up of two subunits of MRE11, two subunits of RAD50, and two subunits of NBS1, and functions in both DSB detection and repair [8]. The recruitment of MRN to DNA damage sites is mediated by its association with several proteins, such as γH2AX or RAD17 [9, 10]. MRE11 is the key component of the MRN complex, exhibiting both endonuclease and exonuclease activities from 3′-5′ [11]. The proteins UBQLN4, C1QBP, p97/VCP or GRB2 regulate the nuclease activity of MRE11 by preventing binding of MRE11 to DNA or by removing MRE11 from damaged chromatin [12,13,14,15].
It has been described that the decrease in DYNLL1, which binds to and inhibits the resection activity of MRE11, restored HR in BRCA1 mutant cells inducing resistance to cisplatin [16]. In fact, BRCA1 mutant patients with low DYNLL1 expression significantly correlated with poor progression-free survival. Furthermore, it has also been shown that NBS1 or RAD50 disruption enhanced cisplatin chemosensitization in human tumor cells [17, 18]. These and other findings relate the activity of the MRN complex to platinum-based chemoresistance.
In yeast, activation of the DNA damage checkpoint induced the degradation of core histones and the recruitment of ubiquitin ligases and the proteasome to chromatin [19]. The two main protein degradation pathways in eukaryotic cells are the ubiquitin-dependent proteasome system and the autophagy/lysosomal pathway. In both cases, ubiquitylated proteins are recognized and degraded by the proteasome or lysosome, respectively [20]. Three enzymes are involved in the ubiquitylation of proteins: E1 ubiquitin activating enzyme, E2 ubiquitin conjugating enzyme, and E3 ubiquitin protein ligase. The E3 ubiquitin ligases are responsible for substrate recognition and thus determine the specificity of the process. The proteasome recognizes ubiquitylated substrates through its ubiquitin receptors, removes ubiquitins, and proteins are digested to peptides [21]. Alternatively, p62/SQSTM1 and other autophagy adaptor proteins target ubiquitylated proteins to the entry of autophagosomes through the LC3-II protein. Autophagosomes fuse to the lysosome to degrade content, including p62 and ubiquitylated proteins [22].
SCF (SKP1-CUL1-F-box protein) is a multisubunit ubiquitin ligase comprised of three invariant components and an interchangeable component, the F-box protein, which specifically binds to substrates. FBXW7, one of the F-box proteins of the SCF complex, is encoded by a gene that appears frequently mutated or suppressed in human cancers. For this and other reasons, FBXW7 is considered a tumor suppressor, although it may depend on the cellular context [23, 24].
Based on a previous proteomic study, this paper analyzes the association of FBXW7 with the MRN complex and its role in response to platinum-based chemotherapies. We discuss the importance of promoting MRN degradation by SCF (FBXW7) to avoid platinum resistance.
Results
FBXW7 induces lysosomal degradation of the MRN complex
In previous mass spectrometry studies of Flag FBXW7 immunoprecipitates from transiently transfected COS-7 cells [25], we identified a single peptide corresponding to MRE11 residues 468-478 (Supplementary Fig. S1A). To verify that FBXW7 and Mre11 are associated in vivo in normally growing cells, the presence of MRE11 in Flag FBXW7 immune complexes was analyzed by Western blotting. Figure 1A shows that not only endogenous MRE11, but also NBS1 and RAD50 interact directly or indirectly with Flag FBXW7. It also shows that these interactions are specifically detected in the nuclear fraction of cells. Furthermore, reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that Flag FBXW7 also coprecipitated with MRE11, NBS1 and RAD50 immune complexes, respectively (Fig. 1B). But, most importantly, FBXW7 and the MRN complex at endogenous levels bind to each other under unstimulated physiological conditions, as we were able to demonstrate using an anti-FBXW7 antibody (Fig. 1C and Supplementary Fig. S1B). As at least in our hands, commercial FBXW7 antibodies do not work well in Western blot analyses, we used coimmunoprecipitation of PLK1 as a positive control for the good functioning of FBXW7 immunoprecipitation [25]. To determine whether the SCF (FBXW7) ubiquitin ligase could be involved in the stability of the MRN complex proteins, we first analyzed the effect of proteasomal or lysosomal inhibitors on the amount of MRN complex components. Treatment of U2OS cells with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 did not increase the levels of MRE11, NBS1 or RAD50 (Supplementary Fig. S1C and Supplementary Table S1). However, inhibition of lysosomal activity by concanamycin A or ammonium chloride did induce an increase in the amount of MRN in the nuclear fraction of these cells (left and center panels of Fig. 1D, respectively, and Supplementary Fig. S1D). The accumulation of BrCA1 after ammonium chloride treatment was used as a control [26]. In addition, activation of the autophagy/lysosome pathway using rapamycin or trehalose caused a slight decrease in the levels of the proteins of the MRN complex (right panels of Fig. 1D and Supplementary Fig. S1D). Therefore, MRN complex proteins are degraded through the lysosome. Next, we constructed lentivirus expressing FBXW7 or FBXW7ΔF, which encodes a dominant negative form of FBXW7 [27], and infected U2OS cells to study their effects on the MRN complex. We found that FBXW7 decreased the amount of the three proteins of the complex, while FBXW7ΔF prevented this reduction (Fig. 1E and Supplementary Fig. S1E). Cyclin E was used as a known protein that is degraded by FBXW7 [28]. Furthermore, the treatment with concanamycin A avoided the degradation of MRN due to SCF (FBXW7) (Fig. 1F and Supplementary Fig. S1F). Together, these results indicate that SCF (FBXW7) induces the degradation of the MRN complex by the lysosome.
MRN degradation is mediated by the Ub-p62-LC3 pathway
To learn more about the degradation of the MRN complex by SCF (FBXW7)/lysosome, we analyzed the ability of SCF (FBXW7) to target proteins from the MRN complex for ubiquitylation in vivo. HEK293T cells expressing epitope-tagged MRE11, NBS1 or RAD50, and Myc Ub in the presence or absence of epitope-tagged FBXW7 were used to assess MRN ubiquitylation. We observed an increase in K48-linked polyubiquitylation in each of the proteins when cells were also transfected with FBXW7 (Fig. 2A). However, when we examined the in vitro ubiquitylation of transcribed and translated [35S]-labeled MRE11, NBS1 or RAD50 by recombinant SCF (FBXW7) produced in insect cells, only high molecular weight ubiquitylated forms of MRE11 were detected (Fig. 2B). These results suggest that MRE11 is the direct substrate of FBXW7 and that, once bound, SCF (FBXW7) also targets NBS1 and RAD50 for ubiquitylation.
Degradation of ubiquitylated proteins through the autophagy/lysosome pathway is usually mediated by an ubiquitin-binding protein (such as p62), which binds directly to ubiquitylated proteins and to autophagosome-associated LC3 [29]. To determine the implication of these proteins in MRN degradation, we explored the potential in vivo association of the MRN complex with p62/LC3 by means of coimmunoprecipitation assays. We detected the association between MRN and p62/LC3 by inhibiting lysosomal enzymes with ammonium chloride, an interaction that was not observed using extracts from untreated cells, probably because proteins were degraded by the lysosome (Fig. 2C). Even more, knockdown experiments showed that reduced expression of p62 or LC3 increased the levels of the MRN complex proteins (Fig. 2D). Similar results were obtained using cells transfected with siRNA FBXW7 or an FBXW7-/- cell line (Fig. 2D and Supplementary Fig. S2). Overall, these data demonstrate that degradation of MRN by the lysosome is mediated by p62/LC3.
SCF (FBXW7) promotes the association of MRN with p62/LC3 in the nuclei of U2OS cells
The proteins of the MRN complex are mainly located in the nucleus [30]. However, p62 and LC3 are found in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm [29]. To find out where the association of MRN with p62/LC3 takes place, we performed subcellular fractionation experiments. By blocking lysosomal activity with ammonium chloride, we showed that the in vivo association of MRN with p62/LC3 occurs exclusively in the nuclear fraction of U2OS cells (Fig. 3A). However, these assays do not rule out that there are also associations in the cytoplasm, mainly because of the detection limitations of co-immunoprecipitation experiments. Although, they would clearly be less relevant than those in the nucleus. In the same vein, light microscopy examination revealed that endogenous RAD50 (or MRE11) and LC3 (or p62) are localized in the periphery of the nuclei of cells treated with concanamycin A, which is not observed in untreated cells (Fig. 3B and Supplementary Fig. S3A, B, C). Therefore, we can conclude that the MRN-p62/LC3 interaction occurs primarily in the nuclei of U2OS cells.
To establish the involvement of SCF (FBXW7) in the MRN-p62/LC3 association, we used U2OS cells expressing FBXW7 or FBXW7ΔF from lentiviral constructs. We found that FBXW7 increased the MRN-p62/LC3 association. But, most importantly, the dominant negative mutant of FBXW7 almost completely prevented the interaction (Fig. 3C and Supplementary Fig. S3D). These results indicate that SCF (FBXW7) is responsible for the MRN-p62/LC3 association in vivo.
FBXW7 induces the lysosomal localization of the MRN complex
As we have shown above, FBXW7 promotes, on the one hand, the association of the MRN complex with the autophagy machinery in cell nuclei and, on the other, the degradation of the complex by lysosomes. Then, we decided to carry out a more precise study to distinguish between the cytosol and the microsomal fraction enriched in lysosomes to determine whether MRN could also be localized in that fraction. We were also interested in knowing the potential role of FBXW7 in that localization. To do that, we first tested various cell lines and found that HeLa cells were the best model to perform this research. Next, we prepared cytosolic, lysosomal, and nuclear fractions and observed that inhibition of lysosomal activity with ammonium chloride allowed us to detect the components of the MRN complex in the lysosome-rich fraction (Fig. 4A and Supplementary Fig. S4A). Furthermore, the presence of FBXW7 from a lentiviral construct increased the lysosomal localization of MRN, while another F-box protein such as βTrCP did not (Fig. 4B, Supplementary Fig. S4B, and Supplementary Table S2). Even more, the dominant negative version of FBXW7 reduced the presence of MRN in lysosomes compared to FBXW7, suggesting that this localization depends on its polyubiquitylation by SCF (FBXW7) (Fig. 4C, Supplementary Fig. S4C, and Supplementary Table S2). Similarly, microscopy studies of normally growing cells showed that blocking lysosomal enzymes made it possible to detect NBS1 in lysosomes visualized with an anti-LAMP1 antibody (Fig. 4D, left panels, and Supplementary Fig. S4D). However, the expression of FBXW7ΔF avoided this localization (Fig. 4D, right panels, and Supplementary Fig. S4D). Taken together, these results suggest that the MRN-p62/LC3 association initially occurs in the nucleus, and then the MRN proteins move to lysosomes to be degraded by the enzymes localized there.
The degradation of the MRN complex by the SCF (FBXW7)/lysosome pathway is increased after DNA damage-induced cell death
Autophagy is induced by starvation and other cellular stressors such as hypoxia, DNA damage, endoplasmic reticulum stress, or pathogen infection [31]. To understand the physiological conditions that increase MRN degradation by the autophagy/lysosome pathway, we first evaluated the effect of serum deprivation. We cultured HeLa cells for 3 days in medium supplemented with 0.15% FCS and compared the amount of MRN with that found in cells growing in complete medium. We observed that starvation-induced autophagy, detected by increased levels of LC3-II and decreased levels of p62, did not induce degradation of the proteins of the MRN complex (Fig. 5A and Supplementary Table S3). As a control of autophagy induction, we blocked lysosomal enzymes with concanamycin A under the same conditions. Next, given the role of the MRN complex as a sensor of DNA damage, we explored the effect of DNA-damaging agents such as cisplatin or doxorubicin on MRN levels. We performed a dose-response assessment between the concentration of cisplatin and the amount of protein of the MRN complex after 24 hours of treatment. We found that the amount of MRN decreased when the concentration of cisplatin was sufficient to induce apoptosis, as determined by PARP cleavage, caspase 3 activation, and the appearance of cells positive for annexin V (Fig. 5B, C, and Supplementary Table S3). Similar results were obtained when cells were treated with doxorubicin (Supplementary Fig. S5 and Supplementary Table S4). Moreover, both treatments entailed an increase in autophagy, which was observed with the LC3-II and p62 markers. To confirm that the decrease in the proteins of the complex was due to their degradation by the lysosome, we inhibited lysosomal activity with ammonium chloride during treatment with cisplatin. This compound not only inhibits lysosomal enzymes, but also enhances cisplatin cytotoxicity and caspase activity [32]. Under these conditions, the proteins of the complex did not decrease (Fig. 5D and Supplementary Table S3). Not only that, the reduction of FBXW7 levels in knockdown experiments, confirmed by the increase in cyclin E, also prevented the degradation of the proteins of the MRN complex due to cisplatin (Fig. 5E and Supplementary Table S3). Subsequently, we checked whether the observed degradation of MRN proteins led to an increase in the lysosomal localization of the MRN complex elicited by FBXW7. To do this, we analyzed the localization of the MRN complex in lysosomes using light microscopy in U2OS and U2OS::HA FBXW7ΔF cells treated with cisplatin and concanamycin A to block autophagic flux. Figure 6 shows that treatment with concanamycin A in U2OS cells (Fig. 6A, left panels, and Fig. 6B) allows to detect a partial localization of NBS1 in the lysosomes, which increases substantially when the cells are treated with cisplatin and concanamycin A (note the arrow). However, the expression of FBXW7ΔF (Fig. 6A, right panels, and Fig. 6B) avoids this localization. Finally, to find out whether overexpression of FBXW7ΔF, which reduces MRN degradation (Supplementary Fig. S6), would lead to a decrease in sensitivity to cisplatin, we performed a cell viability assay. We generated a stable doxycycline-inducible U2OS cell line overexpressing HA FBXW7ΔF and compared the number of colonies that appeared after cisplatin treatment when it expressed HA FBXW7ΔF versus when it did not. Figure 6C shows that FBXW7ΔF increases the viability of cisplatin-treated cells. Namely, the increase of SCF (FBXW7) substrates, among which MRN are included, favors cell viability after DNA damage. Overall, we can conclude that SCF (FBXW7) induces polyubiquitylation and degradation of the MRN complex, especially after suffering catastrophic DNA damage, through the autophagy/lysosome pathway. Under these conditions, FBXW7 enhances cisplatin-induced cell death.
Discussion
The F-box proteins are the determinants of the specificity of SCF ubiquitin ligase complexes, and, through their substrates, they participate in multiple cellular processes. Specifically, the F-box protein FBXW7 regulates stability of numerous proteins involved in cell-cycle regulation, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. FBXW7 primarily targets oncoproteins, such as cyclin E, PLK1, AURKA, c-MYC, mTOR, NOTCH, MCL1 or c-JUN, but also tumor suppressors such as p53 [24]. Consistent with that, the FBXW7 gene appears mutated in a wide variety of cancers. In fact, 3.23% of 46 305 human cancers analyzed had mutations in FBXW7, especially endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer, cervical cancer, and esophagogastric adenocarcinoma [33].
In this work, we found that endogenous FBXW7 is associated with the MRN complex in normally growing mammalian cells, inducing its degradation through the autophagy/lysosome pathway. Autophagy is a highly selective process that occurs in all eukaryotic cells to recycle defective or useless proteins or organelles. It takes place both under physiological conditions and after being induced by various cellular stresses [34]. Nucleophagy is a subtype of selective autophagy that targets nuclear components. It is involved in maintaining cell homeostasis, at least in some organisms, and when it is disturbed, various pathologies can occur, including cancer [35]. FBXW7 induces the polyubiquitylation of MRN, which allows its association with p62/LC3 and, therefore, its degradation by lysosomes. In fact, FBXW7ΔF, which prevented the ubiquitylation of the MRN complex, largely reduced the interaction of MRN with p62/LC3. To support these results, both MRN and p62/LC3 have a perinuclear location when cells are treated with lysosomal inhibitors, similar to that found when other nuclear components are degraded by lysosomes [36]. Moreover, rapamycin treatment of U2OS cells also reduced the MRN protein complex, as described for the degradation of other autophagic substrates [37]. Taken together, our data reveal that FBXW7 is involved in the regulation of basal levels of the MRN complex. Furthermore, to our knowledge, this would be the first or one of the first physiological types of mammalian nucleophagy described to date [38].
Several reports have implicated FBXW7 in the response to DNA damage, due to ubiquitylation of several key regulatory proteins such as p53, PLK1 or SOX9 [23, 25, 39], and in DNA damage repair. Regarding this last process, FBXW7 promotes K48-linked polyubiquitylation and degradation of BLM, an ATP-dependent RecQ DNA helicase involved in the regulation of HR and NHEJ DSB repair pathways [40]. Moreover, FBXW7 also polyubiquitylates XRCC4, in this case through the K63 linkage, to enhance DNA binding of KU70/KU80 and facilitate NHEJ repair [41]. Now, we provide evidence showing that DNA damage-induced cell death increases the degradation of MRN by the FBXW7/lysosome. We found that in vivo treatment of cells with chemotherapeutic agents such as cisplatin or doxorubicin did not alter the stability of the MRN complex, unless the drug concentrations used induced cell death. These results suggest that, while the damage caused by these agents can be repaired, the MRN complex remains intact to perform its function as a sensor for DNA breaks. In contrast, when damage exceeds the ability of cells to repair DNA, DNA break sensors should be degraded to promote, or at least not interfere, cell death. In fact, the expression of a dominant negative mutant of FBXW7 reduced cell death after cisplatin treatment, although we cannot guarantee that it is solely due to the greater stability of MRN. In a similar way, some studies have associated cell death with the loss of nuclear KU70 and KU80, or with the cytosolic accumulation of these proteins [42]. It was reported that oxidative stress-induced apoptosis in pancreatic acinar cells caused caspase-dependent degradation of KU proteins and decreased KU binding to nuclear transporters, which subsequently resulted in a reduction in nuclear KU70/KU80 [43]. Conversely, in the early stages of cancer, in which uncontrolled cell proliferation occurs, KU levels and their ability to bind to DNA increase. Repair of high DNA damage would prevent further genomic instability [44]. Other authors correlated the reduction in KU proteins after transient focal cerebral ischemia in mice with apoptotic DNA fragmentation, suggesting that loss of KU and consequent failure of the DNA repair mechanism could contribute to DNA fragmentation [45]. Gama et al, however, showed that apoptosis induced by different drugs increased ubiquitylation and degradation of KU70 through the proteasome [46]. On the basis of these findings, it is conceivable that MRN degradation via the autophagy/lysosomal pathway may contribute to DNA damage-induced cell death.
Overexpression of the MRN complex has been reported to be associated with the appearance of cisplatin-resistant tumor cells, leading to a poor prognosis [47]. Therefore, the importance of finding compounds that prevent the repair of damage caused by cisplatin is highlighted to avoid the appearance of resistant cells and induce the death of tumor cells. In fact, for years there have been attempts to find an inhibitor or combination of inhibitors that allows the elimination of these tumor cells with some encouraging results [48, 49]. Based on our results showing that induction of apoptosis after DNA damage increases MRN degradation, we could suggest that if we were able to increase the specific degradation of MRN by FBXW7/lysosome after cisplatin treatment, tumor cells could be eliminated, preventing the appearance of resistance to genotoxic drugs. A small molecule could be designed to enhance MRN degradation, similar to those described previously [50]. Furthermore, since it is a physiological degradation, perhaps a lower dose of cisplatin could degrade MRN in the presence of that compound, thus preventing drug toxicity in the patient. However, further studies are required to probe this idea.
Materials and methods
Plasmids, cloning, and sequencing
pCDNA3 Flag FBXW7, pCMVHA FBXW7, and pCMVHA FBXW7ΔF have been previously described [25, 51]. pCMV6 Flag MRE11 and pRG4 Myc Ub were from Origene (Rockville, MD, USA) and ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA), respectively. pCMVHA RAD50, pCMVHA NBS1, pLenti 6.3 HA FBXW7, pLenti 6.3 HA FBXW7ΔF, pLenti 6.3 HA βTrCP and pCDNA5 FRT/TO-HA FBXW7ΔF were obtained by cloning the corresponding PCR fragments in pCMVHA [52] or pLenti 6.3 or pCDNA5 FRT/TO from Addgene (Watertown, MA, USA). The sequences of the constructs were verified on both strands with an automatic sequencer.
Viral transductions
Recombinant lentivirus expressing HA FBXW7, HA FBXW7ΔF or HA βTrCP were produced in the HEK293T cell line. Cells were transfected using Xfect reagent (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA) with the following plasmids: one derivative of pLenti6.3 as described above and pMD2-G, pMDLg-pRRE and pRSV-Rev (Addgene). After 48 h of transfection, the cell supernatant was harvested and passed through a 0.45 μm Puradisc 25 mm filter (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). Subsequently, the viruses were concentrated using a Lenti-X concentrator (Clontech). Cells were transduced with supernatant containing lentivirus for 24 h, and transduced cells were selected after seven days in 20 μg/ml blasticidin (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
Cell culture, transient and stable transfections, drugs, and cell lysis
Routinely, COS-7, U2OS, A549, HeLa, and HEK293T cells (from ATCC) and derivatives were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) from BioWest, Nuaillé, France as described [53]. The COS-7, U2OS, HeLa and HEK293T cell lines were recently authenticated by STR profiling. DLD1 and DLD1 FBXW7−/− cells [54] were grown in McCoy’s 5A medium (BioWest) supplemented with 10% (v/v) foetal calf serum (FCS), 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 100 U/ml penicillin from Gibco. A U2OS cell line with inducible expression of HA FBXW7ΔF was also constructed as previously described [55] using pCDNA5 FRT/TO-HA FBXW7ΔF, pOG44 (Addgene) and the U2OS Flp In T-REx host cell line [56]. 72 h after transfection, cells were selected in DMEM with 10% tetracycline-free foetal bovine serum (Gibco) supplemented with 100 μg/ml of hygromycin (Gibco). The expression of the resulting foci was tested. Gene expression was induced by the addition of 2 μg/ml doxycycline (DOX, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 24 h. Serum starvation was obtained by growing HeLa cells for 3 days in medium supplemented with 0.15% FCS. The DNA constructs were transiently transfected by electroporation or by using a lipid transfection reagent (Xfect, Clontech). Cells were harvested and lysed 18 h or 48 h after transfection, respectively. Where appropriate, transfected cells were retransfected with other plasmids. In the indicated experiments, cells were treated with cisplatin (CDDP, Sigma-Aldrich), doxorubicin (Dx, Sigma-Aldrich), MG132 (20 μM, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), ammonium chloride (40 mM, Sigma-Aldrich), concanamycin A (Con A, 50 nM, Sigma-Aldrich), rapamycin (10 μM, Sigma-Aldrich) and trehalose (100 mM, Sigma-Aldrich), and harvested at various times.
Whole cell extracts were prepared at 4 °C in 420 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Nonidet P-40 (NP40), 10% glycerol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 1 μg/ml aprotinin, 1 μg/ml pepstatin, 1 μg/ml leupeptin and 10 μg/ml chymostatin for 20 min, and sonicated. The extracts were centrifuged at 20,000 g for 20 min and the supernatants were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. Protein concentration was determined using the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
Electrophoresis, Western blot analysis, and antibodies
Proteins were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and gels were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes and probed with the following antibodies: anti-HA-peroxidase monoclonal antibody (#12013819001, Roche, Basel, Switzerland); anti-cyclin E (sc-377100), anti-MRE11 (sc-135992), anti-BrCA1 (sc-6954), anti-histone H1 (sc-393358), anti-α actinin (sc-17829) and anti-p53 (sc-126) monoclonal antibodies, and anti-MCL1 (sc-819) polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); anti-α tubulin (T9026), anti-β actin (A5441) and anti-Flag (F3165) monoclonal antibodies, and anti-p62 (SAB5701338) polyclonal antibody (Sigma-Aldrich); anti-PARP (#551024) and anti-cyclin B (#610220) monoclonal antibodies (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA); anti-PLK1 (#05-844) and anti-γH2AX (#05-636) monoclonal antibodies (EMD Millipore, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany); anti-cleaved caspase-3 (#9664), anti-NBS1 (#14956) and anti-K48 (#8081) polyubiquitin monoclonal antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA); anti-RAD50 monoclonal antibody (GTX70228, GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA); and anti-LC3 (NB100-2220) and anti-LAMP1 (NB120-19294) polyclonal antibodies (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA). Peroxidase-coupled donkey anti-rabbit IgG (NA934V) and sheep anti-mouse IgG (NA931) were obtained from GE Healthcare. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using the Enhanced Chemiluminescence Western blotting system (ECL, GE Healthcare).
Protein level quantification was carried out using ImageJ software (Image Processing and Analysis in Java; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; http://imagej.nih.gov/). Original Western blots for all relevant figures are shown in “Supplementary Data/Original blots”.
Co-immunoprecipitation experiments
1–2 mg of protein from cytosolic and nuclear fractions or NP40 extracts (420 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1% NP40, 10% glycerol, 1 mM PMSF, 1 μg/ml aprotinin, 1 μg/ml pepstatin and 1 μg/ml leupeptin, centrifuged and then diluted to 150 mM NaCl) were incubated with normal mouse (sc-2025) or rabbit (sc-2027) sera (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 30 min and subsequently with protein G or A-sepharose beads (GE Healthcare), respectively, for 1 h at 4 °C. After centrifugation, the beads were discarded and the supernatants incubated for 2 h with anti-FBXW7 (A301-720A, Bethyl laboratories, Montgomery, TX, USA), anti-Flag (F3165, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-MRE11 (#4847, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-NBS1 (#14956, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-RAD50 (NB110-60483, Novus Biologicals) or with normal mouse or rabbit sera, followed by protein G or A-sepharose beads for 1 h. The beads were washed, and the bound proteins were solubilized by adding SDS sample buffer and heated at 95 °C for 5 min.
Subcellular fractionation
Cytosolic extracts (S100) and nuclear extracts (NE) were prepared as described [57].
The lysosome-enriched cellular fraction was obtained as previously described [58]. Briefly, cells were resuspended in hypotonic buffer (40 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM EGTA, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5) for 30 min on ice. Later, they were homogenized by shearing through a 28.5-gauge needle 30 times. After centrifugation at 1000 g for 10 min, the supernatant was centrifuged again at 12,000 g for 10 min. This second supernatant was the cytosolic fraction, while the pellet, enriched for the lysosome, was further washed in an isotonic buffer (150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM EGTA, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5) and dissolved in a lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5) for further analysis.
Knockdown experiments
Cells were transfected with FBXW7α-, LC3- or p62-siRNA [58, 59] using the Oligofectamine method (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to suppress the expression of endogenous genes. EGFP-siRNA [58] was used as a non-specific control. Cells were harvested 48 h after transfection and the reduction in protein levels was confirmed by Western blotting.
In vitro and in vivo ubiquitylation assays
In vitro ubiquitylation was performed in a volume of 10 μl containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 5 mM MgCl2, 0.6 mM DTT, 2 mM ATP, 0.5 μg recombinant SCF (FBXW7) complex expressed in Sf21 insect cells, 1.5 ng/μl E1 (His6-ubiquitin-activating enzyme, Boston Biochem, Cambridge, MA, USA), 10 ng/μl His6-UbcH3 (E2, Boston Biochem), 10 ng/μl UbcH5a (E2, Boston Biochem), 2.5 μg/μl ubiquitin (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 μM ubiquitin aldehyde (Boston Biochem), and 1 μl [35S]-methionine-labelled in vitro transcribed/translated MRE11, NBS1 or RAD50, as substrate. The reactions were incubated at 30 °C for 1 h and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.
In vivo ubiquitylation experiments were performed in HEK293T cells transfected with the indicated plasmids and treated with ammonium chloride 4 h before harvesting. Cells were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), lysed at 95 °C for 15 min in NP40 buffer supplemented with 5% SDS and 10 mM iodoacetamide, and then diluted four times in NP40 buffer supplemented with 10 mM iodoacetamide. Epitope-tagged MRE11, NBS1, or RAD50 were immunoprecipitated and proteins separated by SDS-PAGE, electroblotted, and probed with different antibodies.
AnnexinV binding assays
U2OS cells were treated with CDDP or Dx for 24 h. One million cells were washed in cold PBS and resuspended in 100 μl of annexin V binding buffer containing 5 μl propidium iodide and 5 μl of annexin V-FITC (Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit I, BD Biosciences), incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark and diluted in 400 μl of annexin V binding buffer. Fluorescence was measured on a FACSCanto II cytometer (BD Biosciences) within 1 h. Cell populations (viable, early apoptotic, and late apoptotic) were identified by measuring fluorescence on FITC-A and PerCP-Cy5-5-A channels. Annexin V binding assays were repeated three times in independent experiments. Data were analyzed using Diva software.
Immunofluorescence microscopy
Cells were grown on coverslips, fixed in −20 °C 100% methanol for 10 min on ice, and permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 for 10 min at room temperature (RT). Cells were incubated with blocking buffer (1% BSA, 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS) for 1 h at RT. Coverslips were incubated with primary antibodies for 1 h at RT, washed three times with 1% PBS and once with blocking buffer, and incubated with the appropriate fluorescent secondary antibody for 1 h at RT. The coverslips were then washed three times with 1% PBS and mounted on microscopy slides using mounting reagent with DAPI (Ibidi GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany). Staining was analyzed using a Leica DMi8 inverted microscope with a 63x oil-immersion objective using the same laser parameters. All microscope images were analyzed with ImageJ software. Primary antibodies used: anti-RAD50 mouse monoclonal antibody (GTX70228, GeneTex), anti-NBS1 rabbit monoclonal antibody (#14956, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-MRE11 mouse monoclonal antibody (sc-135992, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-p62 rabbit polyclonal antibody (NBP1-49955, Novus Biologicals), anti-LC3 rabbit polyclonal antibody (NP100-2220, Novus Biologicals) and anti-LAMP1 mouse monoclonal antibody (sc-20011, Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
Cell viability assays
Briefly, U2OS Flp In T-REx HA FBXW7ΔF cells were induced or not by adding 2 μg/ml DOX for 24 h, and then treated with CDDP (30 μM) for 4 h and washed. After 24 h, 5 × 103 and 104 cells of each condition were seeded in 6-well plates and incubated for 8–12 days. Subsequently, colonies were stained with 0.5% crystal violet solution in methanol for 20 min, washed, and air-dried. Stained colonies were counted using ImageJ software. All assays were carried out in triplicate.
Quantification and statistical analysis
Statistical details of the experiments (number of replicates and use of standard deviation) are included in the Figure Legends. Statistical analyses were performed with unpaired Student’s t-tests. Significance is indicated in the figures as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001.
Data availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
Rottenberg S, Disler C, Perego P. The rediscovery of platinum-based cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021;21:37–50.
Brown A, Kumar S, Tchounwou PB. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy of human cancers. J Cancer Sci Ther. 2019;11:97–103.
Chválová K, Brabec V, Kašpárková J. Mechanism of the formation of DNA-protein cross-links by antitumor cisplatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:1812–21.
Basu A, Krishnamurthy S. Cellular responses to cisplatin-induced DNA damage. J Nucleic Acids. 2010;2010:1–16.
Wang L, Zhao X, Fu J, Xu W, Yuan J. The role of tumour metabolism in cisplatin resistance. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:691795.
Chernikova SB, Game JC, Brown JM. Inhibiting homologous recombination for cancer therapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2012;13:61–68.
Ackerson SM, Romney C, Schuck PL, Stewart JA. To join or not to join: decision points along the pathway to double-strand break repair vs. chromosome end protection. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:708763.
Bian L, Meng Y, Zhang M, Li D. MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex alterations and DNA damage response: Implications for cancer treatment. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:1–14.
Stucki M, Clapperton JA, Mohammad D, Yaffe MB, Smerdon SJ, Jackson SP. MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell. 2005;123:1213–26.
Wang Q, Goldstein M, Alexander P, Wakeman TP, Sun T, Feng J, et al. Rad17 recruits the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex to regulate the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks. EMBO J. 2014;33:862–77.
Lu R, Zhang H, Jiang Y, Wang Z, Sun L, Zhou Z. Post-translational modification of mre11: Its implication in DDR and diseases. Genes (Basel). 2021; 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12081158.
Bai Y, Wang W, Li S, Zhan J, Li H, Zhao M, et al. C1QBP promotes homologous recombination by stabilizing MRE11 and controlling the assembly and activation of MRE11/RAD50/NBS1 complex. Mol Cell. 2019;75:1299–1314.e6.
Ye Z, Xu S, Shi Y, Bacolla A, Syed A, Moiani D, et al. GRB2 enforces homology-directed repair initiation by MRE11. Sci Adv. 2021; 7. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe9254.
Kilgas S, Singh AN, Paillas S, Then CK, Torrecilla I, Nicholson J, et al. p97/VCP inhibition causes excessive MRE11-dependent DNA end resection promoting cell killing after ionizing radiation. Cell Rep. 2021; 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109153.
Jachimowicz RD, Beleggia F, Isensee J, Velpula BB, Goergens J, Bustos MA, et al. UBQLN4 represses homologous recombination and is overexpressed in aggressive tumors. Cell. 2019;176:505–519.e22.
He YJ, Meghani K, Caron MC, Yang C, Ronato DA, Bian J, et al. DYNLL1 binds to MRE11 to limit DNA end resection in BRCA1-deficient cells. Nature. 2018;563:522–6.
Abuzeid WM, Jiang X, Shi G, Wang H, Paulson D, Araki K, et al. Molecular disruption of RAD50 sensitizes human tumor cells to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:1974–85.
Araki K, Yamashita T, Reddy N, Wang H, Abuzeid, Khan K, et al. Molecular disruption of NBS1 with targeted gene delivery enhances chemosensitisation in head and neck cancer. Br J Cancer. 2010;103:1822–30.
Challa K, Schmid CD, Kitagawa S, Cheblal A, Iesmantavicius V, Seeber A, et al. Damage-induced chromatome dynamics link Ubiquitin ligase and proteasome recruitment to histone loss and efficient DNA repair. Mol Cell. 2021;81:811–829.e6.
Kocaturk NM, Gozuacik D. Crosstalk between mammalian autophagy and the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2018;6:128.
Coleman KG, Crews CM. Proteolysis-targeting chimeras: harnessing the ubiquitin-proteasome system to induce degradation of specific target. Proteins Annu Rev Cancer Biol. 2018;2:41–58.
Aman Y, Schmauck-Medina T, Hansen M, Morimoto RI, Simon AK, Bjedov I, et al. Autophagy in healthy aging and disease. Nat Aging. 2021;1:634–50.
Galindo-Moreno M, Giráldez S, Limón-Mortés MC, Belmonte-Fernández A, Reed SI, Sáez C, et al. SCF(FBXW7)-mediated degradation of p53 promotes cell recovery after UV-induced DNA damage. FASEB J. 2019; 33. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201900885R.
Galindo-Moreno M, Giráldez S, Limón-Mortés MC, Belmonte-Fernández A, Sáez C, Japón MÁ, et al. p53 and FBXW7: sometimes two guardians are worse than one. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:985.
Giráldez S, Herrero-Ruiz J, Mora-Santos M, Japón MA, Tortolero M, Romero F. SCFFBXW7α modulates the intra-S-phase DNA-damage checkpoint by regulating Polo like kinase-1 stability. Oncotarget. 2014;5:4370–83.
Blagosklonny MV, An WG, Melillo G, Nguyen P, Trepel JB, Neckers LM. Regulation of BRCA1 by protein degradation. Oncogene. 1999;18:6460–8.
Welcker M, Orian A, Jin J, Grim JA, Harper JW, Eisenman RN, et al. The Fbw7 tumor suppressor regulates glycogen synthase kinase 3 phosphorylation-dependent c-Myc protein degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:9085–90.
Koepp DM, Schaefer LK, Ye X, Keyomarsi K, Chu C, Harper JW, et al. Phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitination of cyctin E by the SCFFbw7 ubiquitin ligase. Science. 2001;294:173–7.
Johansen T, Lamark T. Selective autophagy: ATG8 family proteins, LIR Motifs and cargo receptors. J Mol Biol. 2020;432:80–103.
Stracker TH, Carson CT, Weilzman MD. Adenovirus oncoproteins inactivate the Mre11-Rad50-NBs1 DNA repair complex. Nature. 2002;418:348–52.
Murrow L, Debnath J. Autophagy as a stress-response and quality-control mechanism: implications for cell injury and human disease. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis. 2013;8:105–37.
Xu Y, Wang N, Ding Y, Wang C, Yu Y, Liu S, et al. Ammonium chloride enhances cisplatin cytotoxicity through DNA double-strand breaks in human cervical cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2013;30:1195–1200.
Lan H, Sun Y. Tumor suppressor FBXW7 and its regulation of DNA damage response and repair. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:3012.
Konstantinidis G, Tavernarakis N. Autophagy of the nucleus in health and disease. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;9:3685.
Zhao L, Li W, Luo X, Sheng S. The multifaceted roles of nucleophagy in cancer development and therapy. Cell Biol Int. 2021;45:246–57.
Park YE, Hayashi YK, Bonne G, Arimura T, Noguchi S, Nonaka I, et al. Autophagic degradation of nuclear components in mammalian cells. Autophagy. 2009;5:795–804.
Cenni V, Capanni C, Columbaro M, Ortolani M, D’Apice MR, Novelli G, et al. Autophagic degradation of farnesylated prelamin A as a therapeutic approach to lamin-linked progeria. Eur J Histochem. 2011;55:200–5.
Papandreou ME, Tavernarakis N. Nucleophagy: from homeostasis to disease. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:630–9.
Hong X, Liu W, Song R, Shah JJ, Feng X, Tsang CK, et al. SOX9 is targeted for proteasomal degradation by the E3 ligase FBW7 in response to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:8855–69.
Kharat SS, Tripathi V, Damodaran AP, Priyadarshini R, Chandra S, Tikoo S, et al. Mitotic phosphorylation of Bloom helicase at Thr182 is required for its proteasomal degradation and maintenance of chromosomal stability. Oncogene. 2016;35:1025–38.
Zhang Q, Karnak D, Tan M, Lawrence TS, Morgan MA, Sun Y. FBXW7 facilitates nonhomologous end-joining via K63-linked polyubiquitylation of XRCC4. Mol Cell. 2016;61:419–33.
Norbury CJ, Zhivotovsky B. DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Oncogene. 2004;23:2797–808.
Song JY, Lim JW, Kim H, Morio T, Kim KH. Oxidative stress induces nuclear loss of DNA repair proteins Ku70 and Ku80 and apoptosis in pancreatic acinar AR42J cells. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:36676–87.
Pucci S, Mazzarelli P, Rabitti C, Giai M, Gallucci M, Flammia G, et al. Tumor-specific modulation of KU70/80 DNA binding activity in breast and bladder human tumor biopsies. Oncogene. 2001;20:739–47.
Kim GW, Noshita N, Sugawara T, Chan PH. Early decrease in DNA repair proteins, Ku70 and Ku86, and subsequent DNA fragmentation after transient focal cerebral ischemia in mice. Stroke. 2001;32:1401–7.
Gama V, Yoshida T, Gomez JA, Basile DP, Mayo LD, Haas AL, et al. Involvement of the ubiquitin pathway in decreasing Ku70 levels in response to drug-induced apoptosis. Exp Cell Res. 2006;312:488–99.
Altan B, Yokobori T, Ide M, Bai T, Yanoma T, Kimura A, et al. High expression of mre11-rad50-nbs1 is associated with poor prognosis and chemoresistance in gastric cancer. Anticancer Res. 2016;36:5237–47.
Shkundina IS, Gall AA, Dick A, Cocklin S, Mazin AV. New rad51 inhibitors to target homologous recombination in human cells. Genes (Basel). 2021; 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12060920.
Roberti M, Schipani F, Bagnolini G, Milano D, Giacomini E, Falchi F, et al. Rad51/BRCA2 disruptors inhibit homologous recombination and synergize with olaparib in pancreatic cancer cells. Eur J Med Chem. 2019;165:80–92.
Zhou X, Dong R, Zhang JY, Zheng X, Sun LP. PROTAC: A promising technology for cancer treatment. Eur J Med Chem. 2020;203:112539.
Liu N, Li H, Li S, Shen M, Xiao N, Chen Y, et al. The Fbw7/human CDC4 tumor suppressor targets proproliferative factor KLF5 for ubiquitination and degradation through multiple phosphodegron motifs. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:18858–67.
Giráldez S, Galindo-Moreno M, Limón-Mortés MC, Cristina Rivas A, Herrero-Ruiz J, Mora-Santos M, et al. G1/S phase progression is regulated by PLK1 degradation through the CDK1/βTrCP axis. FASEB J. 2017;31:2925–36.
Limón-Mortés MC, Mora-Santos M, Espina Á, Pintor-Toro JA, López-Román A, Tortolero M, et al. UV-induced degradation of securin is mediated by SKP1-CUL1-βTrCP E3 ubiquitin ligase. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:1825–31.
Rajagopalan H, Jallepalli PV, Rago C, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, et al. Inactivation of hCDC4 can cause chromosomal instability. Nature. 2004;428:77–81.
Stewart GS, Panier S, Townsend K, Al-Hakim AK, Kolas NK, Miller ES, et al. The RIDDLE Syndrome protein mediates a ubiquitin-dependent signaling cascade at sites of DNA damage. Cell. 2009;136:420–34.
Brown JP, Wei W, Sedivy JM. Bypass of senescenoe after disruption of p21(CIP1)/(WAF1) gene in normal diploid human fibroblasts. Science. 1997;277:831–4.
Romero F, Germani A, Puvion E, Camonis J, Varin-Blank N, Gisselbrecht S, et al. Vav binding to heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) C: Evidence for Vav-hnRNP interactions in an RNA-dependent manner. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:5923–31.
Galindo-Moreno M, Giráldez S, Sáez C, Japón M, Tortolero M, Romero F. Both p62/SQSTM1-HDAC6-dependent autophagy and the aggresome pathway mediate CDK1 degradation in human breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2017; 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10506-8.
van Drogen F, Sangfelt O, Malyukova A, Matskova L, Yeh E, Means AR, et al. Ubiquitylation of Cyclin E requires the sequential function of SCF complexes containing distinct hCdc4 Isoforms. Mol Cell. 2006;23:37–48.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Oksana Brehey for her technical assistance. This article is dedicated to MT for her dedication to science and education.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación SAF2017-87358-C2-1/2-R and PID2020-118774RB-C21 and -C22, and Junta de Andalucía (2021/BIO-211). AB-F is the recipient of a Ph.D. fellowship from the Vicerrectorado de Investigación Plan Propio de Investigación (VI PPI) from Universidad de Sevilla. JH-R is a Talento Doctor fellow (Junta de Andalucía-FEDER). MM-S is a Marie Curie fellow (Grant number 101024268).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MT and FR performed study concept and design. AB-F, JH-R, MG-M, MCL-M and, MM-S provided acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, and statistical analysis. CS and MAJ performed development of methodology. CS, MAJ, MT, and FR wrote the manuscript with input from all other authors. All authors read and approved the final paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by M Piacentini
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Belmonte-Fernández, A., Herrero-Ruíz, J., Galindo-Moreno, M. et al. Cisplatin-induced cell death increases the degradation of the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex through the autophagy/lysosomal pathway. Cell Death Differ 30, 488–499 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-022-01100-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-022-01100-1