Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) offers a curative option for patients with certain non-malignant hematological diseases. High-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) (200 mg/kg) and sirolimus (3 mg/kg), (HiC) synergistically induce stable mixed chimerism. Further, sirolimus and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 immunoglobulin (CTLA4-Ig), also known as Abatacept (Aba), promote immune tolerance and allograft survival. Here, in a major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched allo-HCT murine model, we combined Aba and/or T-cell depleting anti-Thy1.2 (Thy) with a lower dose of PT-Cy (50 mg/kg) and Sirolimus (3 mg/kg), (LoC). While mice in the LoC group showed graft rejection, the addition of Thy to LoC induced similar donor chimerism levels when compared to the HiC group. However, the addition of Aba to LoC led to graft acceptance only in younger mice. When Thy was added to the LoC+Aba setting, graft acceptance was restored in both age groups. Engrafted groups displayed significantly reduced frequencies of recipient-specific interferon-γ-producing T cells as well as an increased frequency in regulatory T cells (Tregs) except in the LoC+Aba group. Splenocytes from engrafted mice showed no proliferation upon restimulation with Balb/c stimulators. Collectively, in combination with Aba or Thy, LoC may be considered to reduce graft rejection in patients who undergo allo-HCT.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (Allo-HCT), which facilitates and maintains long-term immune tolerance, has tremendous potential to cure patients with non-malignant hematological diseases. While myeloablative conditioning regimens, which utilize high doses of total body irradiation (TBI) and/or chemotherapy to replace the recipient bone marrow with donor cells, may be highly effective, some patients may develop adverse clinical outcomes like graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) [1]. Further, many adults experience excessive toxicities associated with myeloablative conditioning due to organ dysfunction caused by underlying chronic hematologic diseases or associated therapy [2].
Allo-HCT has been widely used to treat patients with malignant and nonmalignant hematological diseases, including hemoglobinopathies and primary immunodeficiency syndromes [3]. One of the significant differences in HCT between these two major categories is that mixed chimerism may be sufficient to reverse the non-malignant disease phenotype. For example, in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), earlier studies involving the utilization of a myeloablative regimen illustrated that even persistent donor myeloid chimerism (DMC), seen in a minority of patients, resulted in a cure without SCD-related complications or GVHD [4,5,6]. Furthermore, we established, in a clinical setting, that only 20% DMC is needed to reverse the sickle phenotype based on vast differences in half-lives between donor (normal) and recipient (sickle) red blood cells (RBCs) [4].
Allo-HCT using a matched related or unrelated donor is a potential curative therapy for several non-malignant hematological disorders; however, the possibility of finding an HLA-matched donor is a major barrier to HCT [7]. Alternatively, HLA-haploidentical HCT (haplo-HCT) dramatically increases the donor pool relative to HLA-matched HCT [8]. The use of a major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched murine model of allo-HCT would mimic the mechanisms associated with host immune response, engraftment and graft failure in haplo-HCT settings [9].
Post transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is an anti-neoplastic immunosuppressive drug widely used in allo-HCT. It decreases the incidence of GVHD [10] and causes alloreactive T-cell dysfunction [11]. PT-Cy in human HCT settings, used at high doses of 100 to 200 mg/kg, may be associated with adverse side effects, including nausea, cardiotoxicity, hemorrhagic cystitis, bacterial and fungal infection, and cytomegalovirus reactivation [12,13,14]. This highlights the cytotoxic nature of high-dose PT-Cy compared to its low-dose, as illustrated in prior studies [15,16,17]. Recently, others have shown an optimal cumulative dose of PT-Cy in mouse haplo-HCT to be 50 mg/kg [18,19,20,21]. PT-Cy at low doses is sufficient to cause alloreactive T cells to become functionally impaired in terms of their ability to cause GVHD and to proliferate [11]. Similarly, the addition of Sirolimus favors engraftment since it inhibits T cell activation through the blockade of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling and promoting Tregs [22, 23]. However, we previously reported graft rejection in mice given either high dose PT-Cy (200 mg/kg) or Sirolimus (3 mg/kg) in a mismatched murine model. However, a combination of high dose PT-Cy and Sirolimus for 15 days starting at day +4 PT resulted in successful engraftment, yet with slowly falling DMC levels from ~50% at one month to ~20% after 10 months post-HCT [18].
The addition of less cytotoxic immunosuppressive agents to conditioning regimens has enhanced the graft acceptance rate. CTLA4, expressed on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, competes with CD28 to interact with co-stimulatory receptors (CD80 and CD86) on antigen-presenting cells (APCs). This interaction leads to checkpoint blockade through T cell unresponsiveness/anergy by the inability of CD28 to bind to CD80/CD86 [10]. Various transplant models have utilized this immune modulatory effect of CTLA4 to accommodate the graft through the chimeric version of this fusion protein, CTLA4-Ig (also known as Abatacept; Aba) which blocks T cell costimulation leading to T cell anergy, and when combined with Sirolimus, prolonged an orthotopic lung allograft in an MHC-mismatched rat model [24]. Lymphocyte-depleting agents are typically required with clinical haplo-HCT to prevent GVHD in patients [25]. In the murine transplant setting, anti-mouse Thy1.2 (Thy) can be utilized to deplete T lymphocytes to reduce graft rejection [26]. In addition, it has been reported that due to both intrinsic toxicities associated with PT-Cy and higher doses being associated with increased GVHD, the optimal dosage of PT-Cy would be 25 mg/kg/day at day three and day four post-HCT to prevent GVHD in murine allo-HCT [20]. We showed previously that high dose PT-Cy and sirolimus were synergistic; when employing both agents, donor myeloid chimerism (DMC) levels started at ~50% at one month PT and then slowly decreased to ~20% over time [18]. Here, we sought to determine if the addition of immunosuppressants Aba and/or Thy, combined with low dose of PT-Cy and Sirolimus (LoC) could increase donor chimerism levels and reduce regimen toxicity compared to high dose 200 mg/kg PT-Cy with Sirolimus (HiC).
Using a mismatched murine model, we evaluated the combinatorial effects of different immunosuppressants on transplant outcomes. Employing a mismatched murine model enabled us to evaluate different conditioning regimens that may facilitate long-term graft acceptance with minimal toxicities.
Materials and methods
Mice
Six-to-ten-week-old female Balb/c (H2-kd) donor, six-to-eighteen-week-old male and female C57Bl/6 J (H2-kb) recipient, and female C3H/HeJ (H2-kk) third-party mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). All mice were handled and cared for in accordance to the protocol, approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). All research conducted on animals followed biosafety level 2 guidelines. Following BMT, animals were monitored regularly for survival and morbidity (body weight, listlessness, ruffled fur). Mice who were unable to eat or drink and demonstrated persistent deterioration of body weight were euthanized.
Bone marrow transplantation
Recipient C57Bl/6 J mice received 200 centigray (cGy) of total body irradiation (TBI) on the day of BMT. Femurs, tibias, pelvises, and the spine were dissected from euthanized donor Balb/C mice and cleaned of muscles and connective tissue on ice in 1x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Bone marrow cells were collected by crushing all the bones with a sterile mortar and pestle in FACS buffer (1x PBS containing 2% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)). RBCs were then lysed using either ammonium-chloride-potassium (ACK) lysing buffer (Quality Biological, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) or 10% sodium dextrose. BM cells were diluted in sterile 1x PBS. Each group of recipients received 20–25 × 106 BM cells in 200 μl/mouse via retroorbital intravenous (i.v.) route. Following BMT, recipient mice were monitored for survival and signs of morbidity. Mice received neomycin-treated sterile water every week from day 0 to day 60 PT.
Immunosuppressive therapy
Lyophilized Cy (Baxter, Deerfield, IL, USA), reconstituted with ultrapure water to make a stock solution of 20 mg/mL PT-Cy, was given intraperitoneally (i.p.) at a single dose of 200 mg/kg body weight/mouse on day 2 PT or one dose of 25 mg/kg body weight/mouse on day 3 and day 4 PT (cumulative total dose of 50 mg/kg). Sirolimus (Greenstone LLC, Peapack, NJ, USA) 1–2 mg tablets were crushed and suspended in carboxymethyl cellulose (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and polysorbate 80 (Sigma-Aldrich) vehicle. Sirolimus was administered i.p., at a dose of 3 mg/kg body weight/day/mouse for 15 days as described previously (7). Anti-Thy1.2 monoclonal antibody (BioXcell, Lebanon, NH) was administered i.p. at 1 mg/mouse, i.p, in 200 μl of PBS on day −7 to day −4 pre-BMT. Lyophilized CTLA4-Ig (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA) was reconstituted in double distilled water and administered i.p., on days 2, 4, 6, 11, and 18 PT at 0.5 mg/100 μl per mouse.
Mononuclear cell and lymphocyte isolation
Mononuclear cells (MNCs) and lymphocytes extracted from the peripheral blood and spleen, respectively, were prepared as described previously (10). Briefly, lympholyte (Cedarlane, Burlington, NC) was used to isolate MNCs from blood according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Spleens were harvested from mice on indicated days, and tissues were homogenized using a cell strainer (70 μm, Nest Scientific USA, Rahway, NJ). RBCs were lysed using a sterile ACK lysing buffer. Lymphocytes were washed and suspended in sterile RPMI complete medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, L-glutamine (2 mM), sodium pyruvate (1 mM), HEPES (1 mM), non-essential amino acids (0.1 mM), 2-mercaptoethanol (50 μM), and penicillin and streptomycin (100 U/ml), and the total amount of live cells was counted.
Antibodies and flow cytometry
The antibody stain combinations were variable across trials and utilized based on lab user experience to provide minimal spillover between color detectors. All antibodies are specific to mouse species (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, or Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham MA). After isolation of spleen cells, peripheral blood MNCs, or both, cells (2-3 × 106 cells) were suspended in a sterile complete medium. For surface staining, cells were stained in FACS staining buffer (PBS, 2% and heat-inactivated FBS). The antibodies used to detect donor-derived and recipient-derived murine antibody conjugates consisted of H2-kd and H2-kb, respectively. Myeloid cells were identified using anti-CD11b and anti-Gr1 antibodies, which delineate granulocytes, monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs). B cells were stained using an anti-CD19 antibody. anti-CD3 antibody used to stain mature T cells, CD4+Foxp3- is used to identify helper T (Th) cells, Th2 and Th17 cells were identified via interleukin (IL-4)+, IL-17+ cytokines. anti-CD8 used to stain cytotoxic CD8 T cells. CD4+FoxP3+ population identified Tregs. DCs were identified using an anti-Cd11c antibody. NK cells were identified using an anti-CD49b and NK1.1 antibody. Macrophages were gated as the CD3-NK1.1-CD11b+ fraction. For intracellular staining cells were fixed, permeabilized and stained with interferon (IFN)-γ and TNF (tumor necrosis factor)-α antibodies. Cells were acquired in live+ population using LIVE/DEAD Fixable Aqua Dead Cell Stain Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). For intracellular detection of lag3 (C9B7W), GATA3 (L50-823), T-bet (4B10), Foxp3 (FJK-16s), and RORγt (B2D), cells were identified after fixation and permeabilization (Foxp3 Transcription Factor Buffer Set, eBioscience). Murine antibodies anti-Lag3, anti-GATA3 (BD Biosciences); anti-Foxp3, anti-RORγt, and anti-Tbet (BioLegend) were used. For intracellular cytokine detection, spleen cells (2-3 × 106) in complete medium were stimulated with cell stimulation cocktail (ThermoFisher Scientific) containing PMA, ionomycin, Brefeldin A, and monensin for 5 h at 37o C. The cells were then washed, fixed, permeabilized, and stained with intracellular cytokine antibodies anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2), anti-IL-4 (11B11, BioLegend); anti-TNF-α (MP6-XT22), IL-10 (JES5-16E3), IL-17 (TC11-18H10, BD Biosciences); and TGF-β (R&D systems) overnight at 4o C. Cells were washed and acquired by BD FACSymphony (BD Biosciences) flow cytometers with FASCDiva software. Flow cytometry data were analyzed using FlowJo Software (FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR).
Mixed lymphocyte reaction
Stimulator (donor group, Balb/C), third-party (C3H/HeJ), and responder (recipient group, C57Bl/6 J) spleen cells were obtained on week 28 PT as described above. Stimulator and third-party cells received 25 Gy irradiation and later, these cells were labeled with cell trace violet. Similarly, responder cells were labeled with CFSE according to the manufacturer’s protocol (ThermoFisher Scientific). Stimulator: responder or third-party: responder cells were plated at a 1:1 ratio, 2 × 105 cells each in complete medium. Cells were incubated at 37 °C and on day 5 of culture, responder cells were analyzed for proliferation within CFSElow CD4 and CD8 T cell populations by flow cytometry.
Statistics
All statistical analyses of this study were carried out using GraphPad Prism software version 8–10 (GraphPad Software, Inc. La Jolla, CA). Differences in cell frequencies of groups were compared using an unpaired Student’s t-test. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
Results
The addition of anti-Thy1.2 with or without Abatacept led to DMC levels of greater than 20% starting at week 10 PT
We utilized a mismatched murine transplantation model in which female donor Balb/c BM cells were transplanted into male 7–8 week old C57Bl/6 J recipients. Recipient mice were conditioned according to the regimen detailed in Fig. 1a. Peripheral blood analysis showed that all mice conditioned with LoC rejected their graft (Fig. 1b, c) as early as week 4 PT, suggesting that insufficient immunosuppression led to graft rejection. Conversely mice that received Aba in addition to LoC (LoC+Aba) displayed improved total donor chimerism (TDC) and DMC levels (Fig. 1b, c) up to 28 weeks PT (Figs. S1a, b, S2a, b).
Next, we assessed the efficacy of combining Thy to LoC (LoC+Thy) with or without Aba. Thy given alone or in combination with Aba to mice which received LoC showed similar TDC levels compared to HiC (Fig. 1b, c) up to week 28 (Fig. S1a, b). These data show that the addition of Aba or Thy can provide sufficient immunosuppression to LoC to facilitate engraftment and maintain DMC levels close to or above 20% through 28 weeks PT.
We further evaluated innate and adaptive immune cells in peripheral blood based on donor (H2-kd) or recipient (H2-kb) MHC class I molecules to determine which cells contribute to engraftment. Donor cells in engrafted mice peripheral blood included H2-kd+ B cells from week 4, while T cell chimerism remained minimal (Fig. 1d, e). The same trend continues from weeks 10 through 28 (Fig. S1c, d). Our data are in tandem with prior studies demonstrating that myeloid and B cells contribute to most donor cells in engrafted mice [27, 28].
Compared to rejected mice, a higher proportion of T regulatory cells to CD4+ and CD8+ T cells is observed in engrafted mice
Although we did not find any clear correlation between the individual CD4+, CD8+ or Treg frequencies and the success or failure of engraftment in younger or older mice groups (Fig. S3a–c), peripheral blood analysis revealed that the recipient-derived Treg to CD4+ T cell ratio shows a modest trend with graft acceptance at week 4 PT (Fig. 2a, b). However, investigation of splenocytes revealed a significantly higher proportion of Treg to CD4+ or CD8+ T cells in successfully engrafted mice groups compared to rejected mice groups (Fig. 2c, d), particularly mice in HiC and LoC groups with additional Thy with or without Aba. Notably, the addition of Aba to LoC did not have a significant effect on Treg to CD4+ and CD8+ cell ratios (Fig. 2a–d). Representative flow plots of recipient derived CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and Tregs are shown in Fig. S3G.
Recipient-derived regulatory T cells and Th2 cells detected in the spleen favor engraftment at week 4 PT
Others have reported that regulatory cells, including Tregs, type 1 regulatory (Tr1) cells, T helper (Th) 2 cells, and regulatory B cells (Bregs), mediate graft tolerance, survival, and function [29,30,31,32]. Paradoxically, inflammatory cells such as CD8+ T cells, CD4+ Th1 cells, Th17 cells, DCs, macrophages, and NK cells favor graft rejection [33, 34]. We observed only a negligible fraction of donor-derived T cells, therefore, we did not evaluate further. Next, we examined recipient-derived CD8+ and CD4+ T cells as well as other subsets of T cells, including Th1, Th2, Tregs, and Tr1 cells, NK cells, DCs, macrophages, B cells, and Bregs. We observed significantly higher frequencies of recipient-derived CD4+ (Fig. 3a), CD8+ (Fig. 3b), B cells (Fig. 3c) in rejected [LoC ± IgG] as compared to engrafted mice [HiC; LoC+Aba; LoC+Aba+Thy; LoC+Thy] splenocytes at week 4 PT. We also observed that donor-derived DCs were significantly lower in engrafted groups (Fig. 3d). In addition, when we analyzed recipient-derived CD4+ T cell subpopulations, we found that the CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs frequency was significantly elevated in engrafted mice (Fig. 3e). Likewise, CD4+ Gata3+ Th2 cell frequency was significantly elevated in most engrafted groups compared to rejected groups (Fig. 3f). These data suggest that recipient-derived Tregs and Th2 cells favor engraftment.
Engrafted mice display reduced interferon- γ -producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and NK cells
Inflammatory cytokines such as interferon (IFN)-γ and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α produced by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and NK cells play critical roles in allograft rejection in both mouse and human allotransplantation settings [35,36,37,38]. We, therefore, evaluated IFN-γ and TNF-α producing cells in our allo-HCT model and found that mice which rejected the graft [LoC ± IgG] illustrated an increased frequency in IFN-γ producing H2-kb+ CD4+ and CD8+ T cells compared with engrafted groups [HiC; LoC+Aba; LoC+Aba+Thy; LoC+Thy] (Fig. 4a, b). NK cells in engrafted Thy groups remained slightly elevated compared to remaining engrafted groups [HiC; LoC+Aba; LoC+Aba+IgG] (Fig. 4c). We did not find any substantial differences in TNF-α-producing cells between groups (data not shown). Next in our model, we evaluated the role of IL-10 and TGF-β; our data showed no statistical difference in IL-10 or TGF-β levels between engrafted and rejected mice (data not shown). These data show that IFN-γ-producing CD4+, CD8+ T cells, and NK cells are associated with graft rejection.
Engrafted mice show functional donor spleen unresponsiveness upon restimulation
Graft survival and function are commonly characterized by the persistence of donor unresponsiveness in allo-HCT settings. Hence, we examined the recipient mice splenocytes on week 28 PT in mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) culture conditions. Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE)-labeled responder splenocytes were mixed with either C57Bl/6 J (self), Balb/c (donor), or C3H/HeJ (third-party) irradiated stimulator cells. As expected, upon restimulation with recipient specific C57Bl/6 J splenocytes, neither engrafted nor rejected groups showed any proliferation in CD8+ and CD4+ T cells (Fig. 5a). Similarly, upon restimulation of CFSE-labeled responder splenocytes from engrafted mice with donor splenocytes, responder splenocytes showed no CD4+ and CD8+ T cell proliferation. On the other hand, rejected mice showed noticeable CD8 + T cell proliferation (CFSElow, Fig. 5b). As recipient mice had never been exposed to the third-party mice carrying the H2-kk+ haplotype, we observed that CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from all groups of recipient mice showed proliferation upon stimulation with third-party stimulators (Fig. 5c). These data demonstrate that recipient-derived T cells in engrafted mice are functionally unresponsive to donor antigen presenting cells (APCs).
The addition of anti-Thy1.2 with or without Abatacept led to donor chimerism levels of approximately 30% to 40% in older mice groups
To delineate the potential effects of aging on transplant outcomes, we next analyzed an older group of male mice aged between 15 and 18 weeks at the time of transplant with the same conditioning regimen detailed in Fig. 1a. Similar to the younger male mice, older mice in HiC groups [HiC, HiC+Aba, HiC+Aba+Thy, HiC+Thy] showed successful engraftment. Interestingly, graft rejection was evident in older mice which received LoC with additional Aba [LoC+Aba] at weeks 4 and 8 PT (Fig. 6a and b) as well as in the spleen at week 12 PT (Fig. S4a, b). The addition of Thy with or without Aba to LoC, however, increased donor chimerism levels significantly in comparison to rejected groups. Representative flow plots of DMC and TDC are shown in Fig. S2c–d, respectively. Older male mice had a higher frequency of donor-derived B cells compared to T cells (Fig. 6c, d) that persisted in the spleen at week 12 PT (Fig. S4c, d). Lastly, at week 4 PT, although no differences in the individual CD4+, CD8+, Treg frequencies (Fig. S3d–f) or the Treg to CD4+ ratio (Fig. 6e) could be elucidated in the blood, there was a modest trend in engrafted mice achieving a higher ratio of Treg to CD8+ T cells in older male mice (Fig. 6f). Representative flow plots of recipient derived CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and Tregs are shown in Fig. S3H. These findings highlight the age-dependency of some immunosuppressant drugs that might fail to ensure successful engraftment in older recipients.
Discussion
Our current results from young mice who received HiC showed DMC at ~20% at week 4 (Fig. 1c) and ~30% at week 28 (Fig. S1B), which is comparable to the results from our previous study in the long run [18]. Here, we report a novel conditioning regimen that allowed for similar levels of DMC using LoC, with the addition of Thy, with or without Aba, leading to sufficient engraftment levels. Further, donor chimerism levels were generally maintained above 20% through 28 weeks PT.
In both mouse age groups, we did not notice any synergistic effect on donor chimerism in mice given Aba and Thy in the LoC setting. However, while older mice administered Aba in the LoC setting rejected their grafts, the addition of Thy to mice given Aba in LoC groups did facilitate engraftment in both age groups. These results demonstrate that while Aba failed to achieve engraftment in older mice, the addition of lymphocyte depletion to LoC increased the efficacy of engraftment.
The sustained presence of Tregs is vital for graft acceptance due to their suppressive role on effector CD4+ T cell, cytotoxic CD8+ T cell, and APC function and cytokine production [39]. Expectedly, HiC yielded a higher proportion of recipient-derived Tregs to CD4+ or CD8+ T cells compared to LoC groups that rejected their grafts. The same trend was observed in mice engrafted in the LoC setting with an additional immunosuppressant of Thy with or without Aba [LoC+Thy, LoC+Aba+Thy]. The addition of Aba without Thy to LoC did not demonstrate significantly higher Treg to CD4+ and CD8+ T cell ratios, regardless of whether this drug combination was administered to younger mice that engrafted or the older mice that rejected their grafts. This suggests other mechanisms are at play for facilitating graft acceptance in mice administered Aba.
Previous studies have shown that the aging of recipient mice may alter the transplant course and impact underlying mechanisms related to graft acceptance and rejection [40,41,42]. As mice age, immunosenescence occurs, where changes in immune cell frequencies impact their function, which is further affected by immune suppression. One such example of age-related cellular change is the reduced effectiveness of P450, a hepatic cytochrome involved in the metabolism of drugs [40]. Due to the apparent age-dependent effects of older mice that may yield unforeseen mechanistic changes, we focused our mechanistic analyses on younger mice.
Cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-10, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, and IL-35 producing Tregs and Th2 cells could facilitate immune suppression and can even determine graft outcome [43] Proinflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α have been shown to play a pivotal role in graft rejection [44]. Sources of these cytokines include cells of the innate component, such as DCs, macrophages, and NK cells, and the adaptive component comprising CD4+ and CD8+ T cells [33, 45, 46]. Previous data illustrate that IFN-γ producing antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and non-antigen-specific NK cells mediate skin graft rejection as well as other models of both solid organ and HSC transplantation [35]. We have shown that recipient-derived IFN-γ producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and NK cells were increased in rejected groups. Earlier studies also noted the potential role of circulatory (plasma, serum, or both) IFN-γ in graft rejection [33]. These data strongly support that both cellular IFN-γ producing T and NK cells and soluble IFN-γ play predominant roles in graft failure. However, when we examined T cells producing proinflammatory (TNF-α, IL-17α) and anti-inflammatory (IL-4 and TGF-β) cytokines, which did not differ between the groups (data not shown), indicating that these cytokines may not have played a significant role in graft rejection with our conditioning regimens.
Previously, we have shown that the tolerance observed in engrafted mice who received a higher dose of PT-Cy and Sirolimus was also evident by recipient-derived unresponsiveness to donor APCs in vitro MLR [18]. When we performed the same analysis utilizing younger mice who received low-dose PT-Cy, Sirolimus, and Aba with or without Thy, donor hyporesponsiveness was unequivocally demonstrated in engrafted mice. Furthermore, engrafted groups that received Aba and Thy showed an immune response to third-party mice. These data suggest that in clinical settings, patients may be unresponsive to donor antigens while maintaining resistance to foreign pathogens.
Based on our findings, Aba plays a role in graft survival when combined with LoC in younger mice, yet minimal donor chimerism levels of 2.1% to clear graft rejection of 0% in older mice. Furthermore, Thy plays a role in facilitating higher levels of donor chimerism when combined with low dose cyclophosphamide and sirolimus. The observed graft rejection was due to IFN-γ-producing T cells and NK cells. Our data complement other studies which illustrate the role of IFN-γ signaling in mediating GVHD induction and the utility of monoclonal antibodies targeting IFN-γ, which may decrease the risk of graft rejection in allo-HCT models [47, 48].
Our study has limitations. Our selection of Thy in the conditioning regimen stemmed from our goal of mimicking lymphocyte-depleting drugs administered to patients on a clinical scale. For example, alemtuzumab and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) effectively deplete lymphocytes in patients with hemoglobinopathies [49, 50]. Additionally, prior studies have demonstrated CD90 to be a highly conserved domain in mice and humans [51]. However, the differential expression of CD90 and the impact of CD90 depletion on transplant outcomes has yet to be fully elucidated in mice compared to humans. As a result, a substantial limitation in our study is that Thy, alemtuzumab, and ATG act through different mechanisms. Nevertheless, our studies show the importance of employing lymphocyte depletion in conditioning regimens.
The difference in graft outcomes with mice administered the same conditioning regimen and with modest age differences remains unclear. Heinbokel et al., reported that Aba decreased cardiac and skin allograft survival in 18-month-old mice compared to 2-3-month-old mice. This difference was due to mechanistic evidence influenced by cellular changes in these two age groups. For instance, an increase in CD28-negative cells among CD4 + T cells in older mice led to inefficient targeting by Aba, manifesting as graft rejection [41]. This graft rejection was observed in tandem with increased IFN-gamma production in older mice administered Aba compared to younger mice [41]. Additionally, there was an increased expression of CD28 on Tregs in older mice recipients, which rendered old Tregs more susceptible to being targeted by Aba and, as a result, compromised the suppressor activity of Tregs in older mice [41]. However, in our study, the difference in recipient mice’s age during the time of transplant between younger (7–8 weeks) and older mice (15–18 weeks) was minimal. Regarding the effect of varying age on transplant outcomes, a significant question in our study remains about how a difference in age at the time of murine transplant led to varying engraftment outcomes. Although mice are considered young adult age at 3–6 months, middle age at 10–14 months, and older age at 18–24 months [52] based on Jackson Labs, there is no universally accepted standard for when mice are considered old. Indeed, a study demonstrated that adult mouse ages were inconsistent between studies and laboratories [53]. The age of mice considered adults ranged from 6 to 20 weeks [53]. These age differences can encompass ongoing developmental changes in a range of systems, which could profoundly impact the outcome of an experiment [53]. Another phenomenon that occurs in both mice and humans is immunosenescence – changes in the adaptive immune system over time. For example, a study notes a difference in naïve CD8 T cell frequencies in the blood of 7-8-week-old mice compared to 16-week-old mice [54]. Our study showed an age-dependent effect on engraftment outcomes in mice 6–8 weeks compared to 16–20 weeks. As a result, a limitation of our study was that these experiments were not done in middle or even old-age mice, as classified by Jackson Labs. Had this been the case, we could have elucidated clear mechanistic evidence for these differences in transplant outcomes. Nevertheless, our older mice showed a significant difference in the transplantation outcome with Aba conditioning, providing us with exciting avenues for future research.
We have reported a novel conditioning regimen that promotes donor chimerism without high dose cyclophosphamide. Together these data suggest that a mismatched murine model given low dose PT-Cy, sirolimus, and Thy, with or without Aba, can maintain DMC at levels close to or exceeding 20%. A clinical trial employing lymphocyte depletion, LD PT-Cy, and sirolimus is underway in patients with SCD who undergo haplo-HCT (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03077542).
Data availability
Data will be deposited in Figshare data repository https://doi.org/10.25444/nhlbi.25152866.
References
Granot N, Storb R. History of hematopoietic cell transplantation: challenges and progress. Haematologica. 2020;105:2716–29. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.245688.
Hsieh MM, Fitzhugh CD, Tisdale JF. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for sickle cell disease: the time is now. Blood. 2011;118:1197–207. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-01-332510.
DeFilipp Z, Hefazi M, Chen YB, Blazar BR. Emerging approaches to improve allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes for nonmalignant diseases. Blood. 2022;139:3583–93. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2020009014.
Fitzhugh CD, Cordes S, Taylor T, Coles W, Roskom K, Link M, et al. At least 20% donor myeloid chimerism is necessary to reverse the sickle phenotype after allogeneic HSCT. Blood. 2017;130:1946–8. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-03-772392.
Saraf SL, Rondelli D. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adults with sickle cell disease. J Clin Med. 2019; 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101565.
Walters MC, Patience M, Leisenring W, Rogers ZR, Aquino VM, Buchanan GR, et al. Stable mixed hematopoietic chimerism after bone marrow transplantation for sickle cell anemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2001;7:665–73. https://doi.org/10.1053/bbmt.2001.v7.pm11787529.
Pawlowska AB, Sun V, Rosenthal J. Haploidentical stem cell transplantation for patients with sickle cell disease: current status. Transfus Apher Sci. 2022;61:103534 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2022.103534.
Bejanyan N, Haddad H, Brunstein C. Alternative donor transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Med. 2015;4:1240–68. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm4061240.
Reddy P, Negrin R, Hill GR. Mouse models of bone marrow transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2008;14:129–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.10.021.
Santos GW, Owens AH. Production of graft-versus-host disease in the rat and its treatment with cytotoxic agents. Nature. 1966;210:139–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/210139a0.
Wachsmuth LP, Patterson MT, Eckhaus MA, Venzon DJ, Gress RE, Kanakry CG. Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide prevents graft-versus-host disease by inducing alloreactive T cell dysfunction and suppression. J Clin Invest. 2019;129:2357–73. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI124218.
Crocchiolo R, Bramanti S, Vai A, Sarina B, Mineri R, Casari E, et al. Infections after T-replete haploidentical transplantation and high-dose cyclophosphamide as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Transpl Infect Dis. 2015;17:242–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.12365.
Lin CJ, Vader JM, Slade M, DiPersio JF, Westervelt P, Romee R. Cardiomyopathy in patients after posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based hematopoietic cell transplantation. Cancer. 2017;123:1800–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30534.
Ruggeri A, Roth-Guepin G, Battipaglia G, Mamez AC, Malard F, Gomez A, et al. Incidence and risk factors for hemorrhagic cystitis in unmanipulated haploidentical transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2015;17:822–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.12455.
Ahn JS, Park S, Im SA, Yoon SS, Lee JS, Kim BK, et al. High-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide in combination with G-CSF for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization. Korean J Intern Med. 2005;20:224–31. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2005.20.3.224.
Nishikawa T, Miyahara E, Kurauchi K, Watanabe E, Ikawa K, Asaba K, et al. Mechanisms of fatal cardiotoxicity following high-dose cyclophosphamide therapy and a method for its prevention. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0131394 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131394. e-pub ahead of print 20150626
Winkelmann N, Desole M, Hilgendorf I, Ernst T, Sayer HG, Kunert C, et al. Comparison of two dose levels of cyclophosphamide for successful stem cell mobilization in myeloma patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142:2603–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-016-2270-9.
Fitzhugh CD, Weitzel RP, Hsieh MM, Phang OA, Madison C, Luznik L, et al. Sirolimus and post transplant Cy synergistically maintain mixed chimerism in a mismatched murine model. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2013;48:1335–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.60.
Patel DA, Akinsete AM, de la Fuente J, Kassim AA. Haploidentical bone marrow transplant with posttransplant cyclophosphamide for sickle cell disease: an update. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2020;13:91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hemonc.2020.01.002.
Wachsmuth LP, Patterson MT, Eckhaus MA, Venzon DJ, Kanakry CG. Optimized timing of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in MHC-haploidentical murine hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2020;26:230–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.09.030.
Wang Y, Wu DP, Liu QF, Xu LP, Liu KY, Zhang XH, et al. Low-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide and anti-thymocyte globulin as an effective strategy for GVHD prevention in haploidentical patients. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-019-0781-y.
Hsieh MM, Fitzhugh CD, Weitzel RP, Link ME, Coles WA, Zhao X, et al. Nonmyeloablative HLA-matched sibling allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe sickle cell phenotype. JAMA. 2014;312:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.7192.
Sehgal SN. Rapamune (RAPA, rapamycin, sirolimus): mechanism of action immunosuppressive effect results from blockade of signal transduction and inhibition of cell cycle progression. Clin Biochem. 1998;31:335–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9120(98)00045-9.
Ugurlu MM, Griffin MD, Tazelaar HD, McGregor CG. Synergistic effects of CTLA-4Ig and sirolimus on orthotopic lung-allograft survival and histology. Transplantation. 2003;76:489–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TP.0000072374.48680.E0.
Fitzhugh CD, Hsieh MM, Taylor T, Coles W, Roskom K, Wilson D, et al. Cyclophosphamide improves engraftment in patients with SCD and severe organ damage who undergo haploidentical PBSCT. Blood Adv. 2017;1:652–61. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2016002972.
Sobel RA, Hanzakos JL, Blanchette BW, Williams AM, Dellapelle P, Colvin RB. Anti-T cell monoclonal antibodies in vivo. I. Inhibition of delayed hypersensitivity but not cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity reactions. J Immunol. 1987;138:2500–6.
Aparicio-Vergara M, Shiri-Sverdlov R, de Haan G, Hofker MH. Bone marrow transplantation in mice as a tool for studying the role of hematopoietic cells in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Atherosclerosis. 2010;213:335–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.05.030.
Small TN, Robinson WH, Miklos DB. B cells and transplantation: an educational resource. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2009;15:104–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.10.016.
Alhabbab R, Blair P, Elgueta R, Stolarczyk E, Marks E, Becker PD, et al. Diversity of gut microflora is required for the generation of B cell with regulatory properties in a skin graft model. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11554. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11554.
Bhat DK, Olkhanud PB, Gangaplara A, Seifuddin F, Pirooznia M, Biancotto A, et al. Early Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells (eMDSCs) are associated with high donor myeloid chimerism following haploidentical HSCT for sickle cell disease. Front Immunol. 2021;12:757279. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.757279.
Ding Q, Yeung M, Camirand G, Zeng Q, Akiba H, Yagita H, et al. Regulatory B cells are identified by expression of TIM-1 and can be induced through TIM-1 ligation to promote tolerance in mice. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:3645–56. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI46274.
Lal G, Nakayama Y, Sethi A, Singh AK, Burrell BE, Kulkarni N, et al. Interleukin-10 from marginal zone precursor b-cell subset is required for costimulatory blockade-induced transplantation tolerance. Transplantation. 2015;99:1817–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000000718.
Bhat P, Leggatt G, Waterhouse N, Frazer IH. Interferon-gamma derived from cytotoxic lymphocytes directly enhances their motility and cytotoxicity. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e2836 https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2017.67.
Masouridi-Levrat S, Simonetta F, Chalandon Y. Immunological basis of bone marrow failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Front Immunol. 2016;7:362 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00362.
Grenz A, Schenk M, Zipfel A, Viebahn R. TNF-alpha and its receptors mediate graft rejection and loss after liver transplantation. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2000;38:1183–5. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2000.184.
Kroemer A, Edtinger K, Li XC. The innate natural killer cells in transplant rejection and tolerance induction. Curr Opin Organ Transpl. 2008;13:339–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0b013e3283061115.
Pietra BA, Wiseman A, Bolwerk A, Rizeq M, Gill RG. CD4 T cell-mediated cardiac allograft rejection requires donor but not host MHC class II. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:1003–10. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI10467.
Powell JD, Fitzhugh C, Kang EM, Hsieh M, Schwartz RH, Tisdale JF. Low-dose radiation plus rapamycin promotes long-term bone marrow chimerism. Transplantation. 2005;80:1541–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000185299.72295.90.
Sawant DV, Hamilton K, Vignali DA. Interleukin-35: expanding its job profile. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2015;35:499–512. https://doi.org/10.1089/jir.2015.0015.
Colvin MM, Smith CA, Tullius SG, Goldstein DR. Aging and the immune response to organ transplantation. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:2523–9. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI90601.
Heinbokel T, Quante M, Iske J, Nian Y, Maenosono R, Minami K, et al. CTLA4-Ig prolongs graft survival specifically in young but not old mice. Am J Transpl. 2021;21:488–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16218.
Maenosono R, Nian Y, Iske J, Liu Y, Minami K, Rommel T, et al. Recipient sex and estradiol levels affect transplant outcomes in an age-specific fashion. Am J Transpl. 2021;21:3239–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16611.
Merli P, Caruana I, De Vito R, Strocchio L, Weber G, Bufalo FD, et al. Role of interferon-gamma in immune-mediated graft failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2019;104:2314–23. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.216101.
Locatelli F, Lucarelli B, Merli P. Current and future approaches to treat graft failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014;15:23–36. https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.2014.852537.
Harper SJ, Ali JM, Wlodek E, Negus MC, Harper IG, Chhabra M, et al. CD8 T-cell recognition of acquired alloantigen promotes acute allograft rejection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:12788–93. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1513533112.
Murphy WJ, Kumar V, Bennett M. Acute rejection of murine bone marrow allografts by natural killer cells and T cells. Differences in kinetics and target antigens recognized. J Exp Med. 1987;166:1499–509. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.166.5.1499.
Rottman M, Soudais C, Vogt G, Renia L, Emile JF, Decaluwe H, et al. IFN-gamma mediates the rejection of haematopoietic stem cells in IFN-gammaR1-deficient hosts. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e26 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050026.
Coley SM, Ford ML, Hanna SC, Wagener ME, Kirk AD, Larsen CP. IFN-gamma dictates allograft fate via opposing effects on the graft and on recipient CD8 T cell responses. J Immunol. 2009;182:225–33. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.182.1.225.
Tjon JM, Langemeijer SMC, Halkes CJM. Anti thymocyte globulin-based treatment for acquired bone marrow failure in adults. Cells 2021;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10112905.
Hsieh MM, Kang EM, Fitzhugh CD, Link MB, Bolan CD, Kurlander R, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2309–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0904971.
Sauzay C, Voutetakis K, Chatziioannou A, Chevet E, Avril T. CD90/Thy-1, a Cancer-associated cell surface signaling molecule. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:66. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2019.00066.
Flurkey K, Currer JM, Harrison DE. Mouse models in aging research. The mouse in biomedical research 2nd Edition. 2007; 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012369454-6/50074-1.
Jackson SJ, Andrews N, Ball D, Bellantuono I, Gray J, Hachoumi L, et al. Does age matter? The impact of rodent age on study outcomes. Lab Anim. 2017;51:160–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677216653984.
Krishnarajah S, Ingelfinger F, Friebel E, Cansever D, Amorim A, Andreadou M, et al. Single-cell profiling of immune system alterations in lymphoid, barrier and solid tissues in aged mice. Nat Aging. 2022;2:74–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-021-00148-x.
Acknowledgements
The authors would also like to acknowledge Dr. Christopher G. Kanakry, National Cancer Institute, for his contribution to developing the initial experiment and Dr. Pradeep Dagur for his contribution in data analysis of cell populations on behalf of the Flow Cytometry Core, NIH.
Funding
FundingThis research was supported by the intramural research program of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health. In addition, M.D.K., K.A., and D.G were supported by NIH Academy Enrichment Program. C.M. and D.G. were supported by the Helena O. Mishoe Fellowship for Underrepresented Scientists and M.B. was supported by the American Society of Hematology Minority Medical Student Award Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MDK, CM, and MA designed and performed experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. KA, CF, and PO designed and performed experiments analyzed the data, and reviewed the manuscript. AG designed experiments, analyzed the data, and reviewed the manuscript. ASh assisted with mouse transplantation and data analysis and reviewed the manuscript. XX assisted with data analysis and reviewed the manuscript. MAB and DG assisted with mouse transplantation and reviewed the manuscript. ASa and MLO assisted with flow cytometry experiments and reviewed the manuscript. JPM helped to analyze flow cytometry data and reviewed the manuscript. CDF conceived the study, designed and analyzed experiments, and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kabore, M.D., McElrath, C.C., Ali, M.A.E. et al. Low dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide and sirolimus induce mixed chimerism with CTLA4-Ig or lymphocyte depletion in an MHC-mismatched murine allotransplantation model. Bone Marrow Transplant (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-024-02237-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-024-02237-y