A qualitative study with an emergent design using semi-structured interviews in focus groups.
To explore the expectations, experiences and desires among individuals who are prescribed drugs for spinal cord injury (SCI) neuropathic pain (NP).
SCI rehabilitation centre.
Eighteen informants with SCI and NP were enrolled. The informants originated from large and small cities in southern Sweden. Data were collected in focus groups consisting of 4–5 individuals in four separate sessions. An emergent design was employed using an interview guide containing open questions. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and data were analyzed according to qualitative content analysis.
A model of three themes emerged: “Balancing between pain and side-effects” described the difficult choices the informants had to make between drugs and their unwanted side-effects and pain, “Desiring competence and structure in pain management” described the informants wishes regarding pain management and “From hope to personal solutions” described the process from hope of total pain relief from drugs to the development of personal strategies.
There is a great need for improvement of SCI-related neuropathic pain management since recommended drugs are insufficiently effective and accompanied by severe side-effects that impact quality of life but also due to structural limitations and physicians’ lack of competence in pain management.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $24.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Werhagen L, Norrbrink Budh C, Hultling C, Molander C. Neuropathic pain after traumatic spinal cord injury—relations to gender, spinal level, completeness, and age at the time of injury. Spinal Cord. 2004;42:665–73.
Dijkers M, Bryce T, Zanca J. Prevalence of chronic pain after traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46:13–29.
van Gorp S, Kessels AG, Joosten EA, van Kleef M, Patijn J. Pain prevalence and its determinants after spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2015;19:5–14.
Siddall PJ, McClelland JM, Rutkowski SB, Cousins MJ. A longitudinal study of the prevalence and characteristics of pain in the first 5 years following spinal cord injury. Pain. 2003;103:249–57.
Craig A, Tran Y, Middleton J. Psychological morbidity and spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2009;47:108–14.
Hagen EM, Rekand T. Management of neuropathic pain associated with spinal cord injury. Pain Ther. 2015;4:51–65.
Bryce TN, Biering-Sørensen F, Finnerup NB, Cardenas DD, Defrin R, Lundeberg T, et al. International spinal cord injury pain classification: part I. Background and description. March 6-7, 2009. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:413–7.
Finnerup NB, Attal N, Haroutounian S, McNicol E, Baron R, Dworkin RH, et al. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2015;4:162–73.
Löfgren M, Norrbrink C. “But I know what works”-patients’ experience of spinal cord injury neuropathic pain management. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:2139–47.
Norrbrink C, Löfgren M. Needs and requests-patients and physicians voices about improving the management of spinal cord injury neuropathic pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:151–8.
Barbour R, Kitzinger JE. Developing focus group research. London: SAGE Publications; 1999.
Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–12.
Hallström H, Norrbrink C. Screening tools for neuropathic pain: can they be of.use in individuals with spinal cord injury? Pain. 2011;152:772–9.
ICT Services and System Development and Division of Epidemiology and Global Health. OpenCode 4.0. Umeå: and Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Sweden; 2011. http://www.phmed.umu.se/enheter/epidemiologi/forskning/open-code/.
Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. London: SAGE Publications; 1985.
Buscemi V, Cassidy E, Kilbride C, Reynolds FA. A qualitative exploration of living with chronic neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: an Italian perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40:577–86.
Hearn JH, Cotter I, Fine P, Finlay AK. Living with chronic neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of community experience. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:2203–11.
Henwood P, Ellis JA. Chronic neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury: the patient’s perspective. Pain Res Manag. 2004;9:39–45.
Henwood P, Ellis J, Logan J, Dubouloz CJ, D’Eon J. Acceptance of chronic neuropathic pain in spinal cord injured persons: a qualitative approach. Pain Manag Nurs. 2012;13:215–22.
Norrbrink Budh C, Lundeberg T. Non-pharmacological pain-relieving therapies in individuals with spinal cord injury; a patient perspective. Complement Ther Med. 2004;12:189–97.
Heutink M, Post MW, Wollaars MM, van Asbeck FW. Chronic spinal cord injury pain: pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments and treatment effectiveness. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:433–40.
Boldt I, Eriks-Hoogland I, Brinkhof MW, de Bie R, Joggi D, von Elm E. Non-pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in people with spinal cord injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;11:CD009177.
Mehta S, Guy SD, Bryce TN, Craven BC, Finnerup NB, Hitzig SL, et al. The CanPain SCI clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord: screening and diagnosis recommendations. Spinal Cord. 2016;54:S7–13.
We gratefully acknowledge Neuro Sweden for their contribution.
This study was partly funded by Neuro Sweden.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
We certify that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during the course of this research. Ethical approval was given by The Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm with ref. no. 2018/1669-31.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Norrbrink, C., Sörling, K., Hultling, C. et al. “Challenges and facilitators—navigating in the landscape of spinal cord injury neuropathic pain”—a qualitative study on the use of prescribed drugs. Spinal Cord (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-00553-w