Abstract
Clinical applications of antiangiogenic agents profoundly affect tumor cell behaviors via the resultant hypoxia. To date, how the hypoxia regulates tumor cells remains unclear. Here, we show that hypoxia promotes the growth of human breast tumorigenic cells that repopulate tumors [tumor-repopulating cells (TRCs)] in vitro and in vivo. This stimulating effect is ascribed to hypoxia-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) that activates Akt and NF-κB, dependent on the attenuated tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. We find that fumarate is accumulated in the TCA cycle of hypoxic TRCs, leading to glutathione succination, NADPH/NADP+ decrease, and an increase in ROS levels. Mechanistically, hypoxia-increased HIF-1α transcriptionally downregulates the expression of mitochondrial phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PCK2), leading to TCA cycle attenuation and fumarate accumulation. These findings reveal that hypoxia-reprogrammed TCA cycle promotes human breast TRCs growth via a HIF-1α-downregulated PCK2 pathway, implying a need for a combination of an antiangiogenic therapy with an antioxidant modulator.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Disorganization of tumor vascular networks that generates inter-capillary distances beyond oxygen diffusion range (100–200 μm) leads to hypoxia as a common feature in cancers [1]. Moreover, unstable blood flow may further alter tumor oxygen availability [2]. In fact, the median oxygen partial pressure is ~10 mmHg in most solid tumors, 4–6 folds less than that found in normal tissue [3, 4]. Although it is capable of triggering tumor cell death through apoptosis and/or necrosis both in vitro and in vivo [5,6,7], hypoxia also promotes tumor angiogenesis, invasiveness, metastasis, and chemo-radioresistance [8, 9]. Such paradox might arise from the complex heterogeneity of tumor cells, in which different cellular subpopulations respond to hypoxia differently. This might be particularly true in breast cancer, since multiple breast cancer subtypes coexist within a tumor [10, 11]. Hypoxia in breast cancer has been widely demonstrated in both mouse and human breast cancers [12,13,14]. Notably, studies have indicated that hypoxia promotes undifferentiated tumorigenic breast cancer cell development and confers them a stem-like phenotype [15, 16]. In line with this, hypoxia has been shown to promote the upregulation of stemness genes such as Oct3/4, CD133, and Aldh1a1 and signaling molecules such as NF-κB, Akt, and Wnt are thought to be involved in the process [17, 18]. Notwithstanding such insights into tumor hypoxia, these findings raise a concern on current clinical use of antiangiogenic agents in solid tumor treatment including breast cancer, considering the possibility of that the blood supply blockade might jeopardize the treatment outcome via promoting tumor stemness development. Therefore, more mechanistic studies on hypoxia and stemness development are required at least in this type of cancer.
The alteration of glucose metabolism might be of paramount importance for a cell to respond hypoxia. This is because oxygen insufficiency may influence the TCA cycle and glycolysis through hindering the electron transport chain. Notably, this metabolic alteration seems also to have some relationship with the stemness of hypoxic breast cancer cells. For instance, upregulation of glucose metabolic enzymes such as PHGDH has been reported to maintain hypoxic breast cancer stemness via regulating one-carbon metabolism [19, 20]. In addition, upregulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase which regulates the TCA cycle has also been implicated in regulating hypoxic breast cancer stemness [21]. To date, the mechanism through which hypoxia-reprogrammed glucose metabolism confers breast cancer stemness development remains unclear.
Breast stem cell-like cancer cells (SCLCCs) belong to highly tumorigenic subpopulation, which have originally been identified by surface markers CD44+CD24−/lowLineage− [22]. However, the use of surface marker to define SCLCCs is controversial due to the unreliability of existing markers [23,24,25], and that stem and non-stem states are converted bi-directionally [26]. Previously, we applied the biomechanical principles and used soft 3D fibrin gels in 90 Pa elastic stiffness to culture highly tumorigenic cells, and as few as ten of these cells are able to grow tumors in immunocompetent mice [27]. These mechanically amplified tumorigenic cells are functionally defined as tumor-repopulating cells (TRCs), which are distinct from the SCLCCs that are isolated using conventional cell surface markers, and also appear to be different from the tumor-initiating cells (TICs) which have three distinct subtypes [28]. Moreover, such TRCs can represent SCLCCs in actual tumors such as CD133+ melanoma cells and ALDH+ breast cancer cells [29, 30]. In the present study, we provide evidence that hypoxia promotes the growth of human breast cancer TRCs. The underlying mechanism involves in the downregulation of PCK2 (also known as PEPCK-M) by hypoxia, accumulation of fumarate via reprogrammed TCA cycle and subsequent fumarate-caused increase of ROS levels which promote human breast TRC growth via activating NF-κB and Akt.
Results
Stem cell-like breast cancer cells are located in hypoxic microenvironments
Antiangiogenic agents such as sunitinib, when used in cancer patients, generally result in intratumoral hypoxia [18]. To investigate the influence of hypoxia on breast tumor cells, we treated the nude mice, bearing MCF-7 breast cancer with palpable size of 50–100 mm3, with sunitinib (60 mg/kg/day). After 35 days, we found that tumors in the sunitinib group were much smaller in size and less vascularized distribution, compared to the control group (Fig. 1a, b). Also, tumors from sunitinib-treated mice displayed multiple areas of intense hypoxia, determined by a hypoxia probe pimonidazole staining (Fig. 1c). Intriguingly, when we used real-time PCR to analyze gene expression in tumor tissues, we found that stemness marker Sox2 was strikingly upregulated along with other stemness markers Oct3/4 and Klf4 in the sunitinib group, compared to the control group (Fig. 1d). Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) is commonly used to mark stem cell-like breast cancer cells [17, 30]. Following sunitinib treatment, ALDH1 expression was also upregulated in tumor tissues (Fig. 1e). Surprisingly, more ALDH1+ tumor cells were found to be located in hypoxic areas compared to normoxic areas (Fig. 1f). Moreover, such ALDH1+ tumorigenic cells in a hypoxic microenvironment showed much higher Ki67 expression (Fig. 1f), indicating a proliferation status. Together, these data suggest that stem cell-like breast cancer cells might prefer to stay in a hypoxic microenvironment.
Hypoxia promotes the growth of human breast tumor-repopulating cells in vitro
Subsequently, we aimed to validate the above in vivo results in vitro. Despite the importance of stem cell-like tumor cells in tumor initiation, progression, metastasis, and drug resistance, a limitation is that this population belongs to a minor subpopulation and the insufficient quantity restricts extensive mechanistic studies on such stem cell-like cells. To overcome the obstacle, we previously established a mechanics-based 3D soft fibrin gel culture system to select and amplify TRCs [27]. When we seeded ALDH1high tumor cells from the above breast tumor tissue into the soft 3D fibrin gels, we found that high to 89.7% (357/400) cells could grow colonies. However, less than 8% ALDH1− tumor cells (30/400) grew colonies (Fig. 2a), suggesting ALDH1high breast tumor cells represent TRCs. Thus, in the following studies, we used human breast cancer TRCs to investigate the mechanistic aspects of how hypoxia promotes tumorigenic breast cell growth. In line with our in vivo data, we found that MCF-7 TRCs grew much better in hypoxia (1% oxygen) than those in normoxia (21% oxygen), as evidenced by increased colony sizes, even if colony number had no difference (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. S1). Similarly, this phenomenon was also observed in TRCs from the BT474 and MDA-MB-468 human breast tumor cell line as well as TRCs isolated from three clinical breast tumor samples (Fig. 2c–e). In line with the increased growth, both cell cycle analysis and BrdU incorporation assay showed that MCF-7 TRCs in hypoxia markedly increased DNA synthesis (S phase), compared to their normoxic counterparts (Fig. 2f). Using a comparable approach, we also observed that MCF-7 TRCs displayed increased growth in CoCl2 treated group which stabilized HIF-1α protein (Supplementary Fig. S2). Notably, such hypoxia-promoted tumor cell growth seemed to be present in MCF-7 TRCs rather than their differentiated counterparts, because in hypoxic conditions, bulk MCF-7 tumor cells cultured in rigid plate were found to cease growth (Fig. 2g). By contrast, few hypoxic MCF-7 TRCs underwent apoptosis, similar to those TRCs in normoxia (Fig. 2h). Such hypoxic MCF-7 TRCs showed the phenotype of upregulated stemness markers, including Aldh1a1, Sox2, CD133, Oct3/4, and Klf4 (Fig. 2i), suggesting that TRCs benefit from hypoxia with a growth and stemness phenotype. To further verify this, we inoculated 1 × 105 hypoxic or normoxic MCF-7 TRCs in NOD-SCID mice, and found that hypoxic TRCs had a greater ability to form a tumor (Fig. 2j). Together, these results suggest that a hypoxic microenvironment is favorable for TRCs proliferation without differentiation.
Hypoxia-promoted TRC growth is mediated by ROS
Next, we investigated the mechanism through which hypoxia-promoted breast cancer TRCs growth. A key function of oxygen in a cell is to produce H2O via mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. However, oxygen in the mitochondria can also react with electrons in the absence of proton to generate superoxide, the prototype of reactive oxygen species (ROS). We found that hypoxic MCF-7 TRCs exhibited higher levels of ROS than normoxic TRCs (Fig. 3a). Similar results were also obtained from primary human breast cancer TRCs (Fig. 3b). Intriguingly, blocking ROS levels with antioxidant N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) effectively hindered TRCs growth in hypoxia but not in normoxia (Fig. 3c, d and Supplementary Fig. S3). By contrast, the addition of hydrogen peroxide to culture medium could result in intracellular ROS elevation (Supplementary Fig. S4) and accompanied with increased MCF-7 TRCs growth in normoxia (Fig. 3e), suggesting that ROS is involved in hypoxia-promoted TRCs growth. In addition, while ROS levels were shown no significant difference between MCF-7 TRCs and bulk tumor cells in normoxia, the bulk ones showed higher levels of ROS than TRCs in hypoxia and the addition of NAC could relieve the hypoxia-induced growth retardation of the bulk tumor cells (Fig. 3f, g), implying that hypoxia-induced ROS production triggers a certain unique pathway that promotes TRCs growth. Although high levels of ROS inevitably cause cellular damage by oxidizing lipids, proteins, and DNA, certain levels of intracellular ROS can actually function as signaling mediators to regulate physiological and biological responses [31]. This led us to hypothesize that TRCs utilize ROS to activate intracellular growth signal(s) so to accelerate their growth in hypoxia. Two key signaling molecules that regulate cellular growth and proliferation, NF-κB and Akt, were found to be effectively activated in MCF-7 TRCs and primary human breast cancer TRCs under hypoxic condition, as evidenced by increased phosphorylation of p65 and Akt (Fig. 3h). Notably, H2O2 has been known to oxidize critical cysteine thiol groups of phosphatases such as PTEN, leading to the phosphorylation of NF-κB and Akt [32]. In line with this notion, the addition of hydrogen peroxide to cultured MCF-7 TRCs in normoxia led to the increased NF-κB and Akt phosphorylation (Fig. 3i). However, the addition of NAC could blunt the hypoxia-activated NF-κB and Akt (Fig. 3j). On the other hand, we blocked the activity of NF-κB or Akt with inhibitors and found that the promoting effect of hypoxia on TRC growth was prevented but not in normoxic conditions (Fig. 3k–m and Supplementary Fig. S5). Together, these data suggest that hypoxia increases ROS production, allowing ROS as signal molecules to activate NF-κB and Akt, to ultimately promote human breast cancer TRC growth.
Attenuated TCA cycle is involved in the increased ROS production
Next, we explored how hypoxia-increased ROS production in breast cancer TRCs. Regarding the TCA cycle coupling with oxidative phosphorylation, carbon flow in the cycle should be affected by oxygen insufficiency. Indeed, an attenuated carbon flow of the TCA cycle in hypoxia was verified by a 13C-labeled glucose tracing assay. As shown in (Fig. 4a–e and Supplementary Fig. S6), the relative abundance of the first (m + 2) and the second (m + 4) TCA cycle intermediates, including citrate, α-KG, fumarate and malate, was much lower in hypoxic TRCs than those in normoxic TRCs. In line with this decreased carbon flow, the expression of citrate synthase (CS), isocitrate dehydrogenase 3G (IDH3G) and α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase was downregulated in hypoxic MCF-7 TRCs (Fig. 4f), suggesting that the TCA cycle in TRCs is attenuated during hypoxia. To verify whether this attenuated TCA cycle is associated with the increased ROS levels and TRCs growth, we knocked down malate dehydrogenase (MDH) to restrain carbon flow in the TCA cycle in hypoxia. We found that TRCs growth was stimulated, simultaneous with increased ROS levels (Fig. 4g, h). Consistently, the use of NAC to reduce ROS levels led to decreased TRCs growth (Supplementary Fig. S7), suggesting that the attenuated TCA cycle increases ROS production for hypoxia-induced breast cancer TRCs growth. To further validate this, we additionally knocked down IDH3G to restrain the carbon flow from the upstream of the TCA cycle. Surprisingly, such IDH3G knockdown did not promote but inhibited the hypoxia-induced TRCs growth, concomitant with decreased ROS levels (Fig. 4i, j), and replenishing hydrogen peroxide rescued the impaired TRCs growth (Fig. 4k). These paradoxical results might result from the altered intermediate metabolite(s) of the TCA cycle, considering that enzymatic blockade may result in the increase of upstream metabolites but the decrease of downstream metabolites.
Fumarate accumulation results in ROS elevation via forming succinic glutathione
Next, we asked whether and how altered intermediate metabolite(s) contributed to increased ROS production in hypoxic TRCs. We measured the concentration of metabolites between the above two enzymatic reactions, including α-ketoglutarate, succinate, fumarate and malate in hypoxic and normoxic breast cancer TRCs. We did find that the levels of these intermediate metabolites were markedly elevated in hypoxic TRCs (Fig. 5a). It is known that hypoxia upregulates the expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase1 (PDK1), an enzyme that phosphorylates and prevents pyruvate dehydrogenase from using pyruvate to fuel the TCA cycle [33], thus leading to the decrease of the above intermediate metabolites. Here we also found that the PDK1 expression were increased in hypoxic TRCs (Supplementary Fig. S8). To reconcile this paradox, we speculated that hypoxic TRCs might use glutamine as a supplemental carbon source, considering the important role of glutamine in supporting the TCA cycle [34]. By conducting 13C labeled glutamine tracing assay, we found that more glutamine-derived intermediate metabolites (m + 5 α-KG and m + 4 succinate, fumarate and malate) were detected in hypoxic TRCs relative to normoxic ones (Fig. 5b, c). In addition, we found that a lower glutamine level inhibited hypoxic TRC growth, but did not affect normoxic TRC growth (Supplementary Fig. S9), suggesting that hypoxic breast TRCs mobilize glutamine metabolism to elevate the levels of α-ketoglutarate, succinate, fumarate and malate. To verify which metabolite(s) is involved in ROS production in hypoxic TRCs, we used dimethyl 2-oxoglutarate (MOG), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), succinic acid dimethyl ester (SAD), the corresponding cell membrane-permeable forms of α-KG, fumarate and succinate (Supplementary Fig. S10), and L-malate to treat hypoxic TRCs, respectively. Notably, we found that only DMF increased ROS levels (Fig. 5d), consistent with a previous report [35]. In addition, we also tested fumarate monomethyl fumarate (MMF), another cell membrane-permeable form of fumarate. We found that the levels of fumarate in the hypoxic TRCs were also elevated, concomitant with increased ROS levels (Supplementary Fig. S11). Fumarate is a carbon-carbon double bond unsaturated electrophilic metabolite that can covalently bind to a thiolate anion of cysteine residues to form a S-(2-succinyl)-cysteine (2SC) adduct, known as protein succination [36]. Fumarate covalently binds glutathione, thus producing succinated glutathione (GSF); whereas GSF can act as a substrate of glutathione reductase, thus consuming NADPH and elevating ROS levels via hindering glutathione production [37]. In line with this notion, hypoxic breast cancer TRCs showed much higher GSF than normoxic TRCs (Fig. 5e and Supplementary Fig. S12). Furthermore, the result from 13C-labled glutamine showed that glutamine-derived fumarate resulted in more GSF (m + 4 form) in hypoxic TRCs (Supplementary Fig. S13). Also, the ratios of GSH/GSSG and NADPH/NADP+ were lower in hypoxic TRCs (Fig. 5f, g). Moreover, provision of ethyl-GSH (E-GSH), a cell-permeable derivative of GSH, could rescue NADPH levels to the extent of that in normoxic TRCs, decreased ROS levels, and hindered hypoxia-promoted TRCs growth (Fig. 5h, i). In addition, the increase of GSF and decrease of NADPH could be remedied by IDH3G knockdown, but became worse by fumarate hydratase knockdown (Fig. 5j, k and Supplementary Fig. S14). Considering the higher ROS levels in hypoxic differentiated MCF-7 cells, we additionally measured GSF and the GSH/GSSG ratio, which showed that GSF was higher and the GSH/GSSG ratio was reduced in differentiated MCF-7 cells as compared to the MCF-7 TRCs after the induction of hypoxia (Supplementary Fig. S15). Thus, it may stand to reason that too much ROS was generated in the hypoxic differentiated MCF-7 cells which caused growth retardation in these cells. Together, these data suggest that fumarate accumulation causes the formation of succinic glutathione, leading to the increased, and yet suitable, ROS levels in hypoxic breast cancer TRCs.
PCK2 downregulation causes fumarate accumulation in hypoxic breast cancer TRCs
Subsequently, we investigated how hypoxia caused fumarate accumulation in breast cancer TRCs. Mitochondrial phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PCK2) is a key enzyme that regulates the carbon flow of the TCA cycle by the conversion of mitochondrial oxaloacetate (OAA) to phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP). Previously, we found that the downregulation of PCK2 leads to increased fumarate levels in B16 melanoma TRCs [38]. Here, we found that PCK2 was highly expressed in normoxic breast cancer TRCs but much lowly expressed under hypoxic conditions (Fig. 6a). Utilizing a tetracycline-induced PCK2 overexpression system (Supplementary Fig. S16), we found that PCK2 overexpression led to decreasing the levels of fumarate, ROS and GSF, but increasing NADPH/NADP+ and GSH/GSSG in hypoxic breast cancer TRCs (Fig. 6b–d). As a result, PCK2 overexpression led to a decreased proliferation and stemness gene expression in hypoxic TRCs (Fig. 6e–g). In addition, PCK2 knockdown promoted TRC growth (increased colony size) in normoxia (Supplementary Fig. S17). Given the catalysis of OAA by PCK2, we additionally analyzed OAA, and found that OAA levels were low in normoxic TRCs but were high in hypoxic TRCs; however, OAA levels were decreased as a result of PCK2 overexpression (Fig. 6h), implying that PCK2 downregulation causes OAA accumulation. Thus, we hypothesized that increased OAA levels impeded carbon flow and resulted in fumarate accumulation in hypoxic TRCs. To test this, we used 13C-glucose to trace carbon flow in the TCA cycle. As expected, m + 2 and m + 4 forms of citrate, α-ketoglutarate, fumarate and malate were elevated in hypoxic PCK2-overexpressing TRCs (Fig. 6i–l and Supplementary Fig. S18). In addition, the result from 13C-glutamine tracing showed that PEP from glutamine-derived OAA (m + 3 form) was decreased in hypoxic TRCs, which could be rescued by PCK2 overexpression (Supplementary Fig. S19). Such PCK2 overexpression decreasing intermediate metabolites and ROS levels (Supplementary Fig. S20 and Fig. 6m, n) and hypoxic TRCs (ALDH1+ cells) proliferation was observed in nude mice inoculated with PCK2-overexpressing TRCs, followed by sunitinib treatment and Ki67 staining (Fig. 6o, p). Consistently, an increased NADPH/NADP+ ratio and a decreased tumor growth were also observed (Fig. 6q, r). In addition, the expression of stemness genes were downregulated in the PCK2-overexpressing group (Fig. 6s). Together, these data suggest that PCK2 downregulation can cause OAA accumulation, thus hindering the carbon flow of the TCA cycle and leading to fumarate accumulation in hypoxic breast cancer TRCs.
HIF-1α negatively regulates PCK2 expression
Finally, we investigated the mechanism by which PCK2 was downregulated in hypoxic breast cancer TRCs. Upregulation of hypoxia-induced factors (HIF) is a universal response of cells to hypoxia. Previous study had showed that HIF could regulate PCK2 expression in human lung cancer cells [39]. Given that HIFs profoundly regulate glucose metabolism including the TCA cycle, we determined HIF-α protein levels in hypoxic breast cancer TRCs by western blot. Both normoxic and hypoxic breast cancer TRCs highly expressed HIF-2α, however, HIF-1α was strikingly upregulated only in hypoxic TRCs (Fig. 7a), prompting us to hypothesize that the expression of PCK2 was regulated by HIF-1α. When we used siRNAs to knockdown HIF-1α, we found that PCK2 expression was upregulated in hypoxic breast cancer TRCs (Fig. 7b). Correspondingly, overexpression of HIF-1α resulted in the PCK2 downregulation (Fig. 7b), suggesting that PCK2 is regulated by HIF-1α. In line with this result, a 13C-glucose tracing assay showed that HIF-1α knockdown promoted carbon flow of the TCA cycle (Fig. 7c–e and Supplementary Fig. 21). Moreover, analysis with the UCSC Genome Browser and JASPAR revealed the presence of multiple consensus cis-elements for HIF-1α binding on the promoter of PCK2, and a Chip-PCR assay indicated that HIF-1 directly bound to the PCK2 promoter (Fig. 7f, g). We then conducted a PCK2 promoter luciferase assay, showing that HIF-1α knockdown increased luciferase activity but HIF-1α overexpression decreased the luciferase activity (Fig. 7h). Since fumarate is able to regulate HIF-1α stability via inhibiting a-ketoglutarate, we additionally used MMF to treat normoxic breast cancer TRCs. As expected, HIF-1α expression was enhanced and PCK2 expression was further decreased (Fig. 7i). Meanwhile, the phosphorylation of p65 and Akt were increased by MMF treatment (Supplementary Fig. S22). In line with this, TRC growth (colony size) were accelerated after MMF treatment in normoxia (Fig. 7j). Together, these results suggest that hypoxia-induced HIF-1α negatively regulates PCK2 expression and fumarate accumulation further strengthens this feedback in breast cancer TRCs.
Discussion
Hypoxia as a hallmark of cancer is intensively investigated in various tumor types. To date, how hypoxia differentially regulates heterogeneous tumor cells, however, remains unclear. In particular, how hypoxia reprograms the metabolism of stem-like tumorigenic cells is poorly understood. In the present study, we provide evidence that hypoxia induces the downregulation of PCK2 expression that promotes the growth of human breast tumor-repopulating cells via reprogramming the TCA cycle.
Cancer cells show increased ROS in the cytosol, where free radicals promote many aspects of tumor progression and metastasis [40]. Notably, such ROS production can be further elevated under hypoxic conditions. For example, mitochondria increase the levels of cytosolic ROS during hypoxia, where ROS is produced at the Qo site of the mitochondrial complex III [41]. Although many reports indicate that mitochondrial ROS production is capable of stabilizing HIF-1α protein during hypoxia [42, 43], studies also show that HIF-1α stabilization is independent of mitochondrial ROS [42]. Notwithstanding this paradox, to date, the mechanism through which hypoxia increases ROS levels remains elusive [44]. In the present study, we provide evidence that the impairment of the ROS clearance is an important pathway that mediates the elevation of ROS levels under hypoxic condition. Glutathione system plays a critical role in anti-oxidation. Reduced glutathione (GSH) uses the thiol group to react with ROS, concomitant with the conversion of GSH to glutathione disulfide (GSSG). In this process, glutathione reductase is required to catalyze GSSG to GSH with NADPH providing the proton, thus maintaining the continuous clearance of ROS and keeping redox homeostasis. However, hypoxic TRCs attenuate their TCA cycle, leading to fumarate accumulation; the latter then covalently binds to thiolate anion of cysteine residues of glutathione. This succinated GSH acts as an alternative substrate to compete glutathione reductase with GSSG and inhibits GSH regeneration, leading to increasing ROS levels.
High levels of ROS directly oxidize macromolecules, which induces senescence and apoptosis by causing damage to DNA and mitochondrial permeabilization or activating protein kinase Cδ which triggers senescence [45, 46]. Notwithstanding this ROS-triggered cellular damage, a moderate increase of ROS levels actually exerts a signaling transduction effect. In this study, we find that ROS promotes TRCs growth by activating NF-κB and Akt pathways, and inhibiting either NF-κB or Akt blocks the effect of ROS on TRC growth. These findings reveal that breast cancer TRCs mobilize the elevated ROS to activate tumor-promoting signal molecules for their growth during hypoxia. Paradoxically, we also find in this study that hypoxia induces the growth retardation or even apoptosis of differentiated breast cancer cells. These cells have higher ROS than hypoxic TRCs and their growth retardation can be relieved by the addition of NAC, suggesting that excessive ROS has an inhibitory effect on differentiated breast cancer cells. However, the question is why differentiated breast cancer cells produce more ROS during hypoxia than the TRCs. Furthermore, whether and how hypoxia-reprogrammed metabolism differs between differentiated breast cancer cells and TRCs remains unclear. However, these issues are worthy of investigation.
An important finding in this study is that PCK2 triggers hypoxic breast TRC growth. Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase has two isoforms, PCK1 (cytosolic) and PCK2 (mitochondrial). PCK is the hub enzyme that regulates glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid cycle and gluconeogenesis. Previously, we found that the upregulation of PCK1 but downregulation of PCK2 mediate the retrograde carbon flow to glycerol-3-phosphate for glycerol biogenesis which fixes free fatty acids to lipids in melanoma TRCs [38, 47]. Such PCK1-directed carbon retrograde flow has also been found in memory T cells [48]. In this study, we find that PCK2 is downregulated in hypoxic TRCs, thus reducing the transition of mitochondrial OAA to PEP, leading to the accumulation of OAA, and impeding the upstream carbon flow to OAA. In support, the 13C tracing assay shows a hindered carbon flow of the TCA cycle. This might be the reason why we observe an increased fumarate level in hypoxic breast TRCs. However, the question is how PCK2 is downregulated in hypoxic TRCs? Since HIF-1α is the key transcriptional factor that mediates cellular response to hypoxia, we investigated whether PCK2 was regulated by HIF-1α. Indeed, both Chip-PCR and luciferase analysis showed that HIF-1α bond to PCK2 promotor region and negatively regulated PCK2 expression. Intriguingly, accumulated fumarate as an α-ketoglutarate competing inhibitor, in turn further enhances HIF-1α stability, leading to further downregulating PCK2 expression and further strengthening fumarate accumulation, thus forming a positive feedback.
In summary, the data in this study clearly show that hypoxia, by virtue of its reprogramming the TCA cycle, promotes the growth of breast TRCs through a fumarate-succinated GSH-ROS pathway. These findings not only broaden our understanding of the role of hypoxia in cancer biology, but also clarify the differential effect of hypoxia on breast cancer TRCs and the differentiated counterparts. Moreover, this study might possess important clinical significance in that stem-like cancer cells grow more rapidly under the hypoxic conditions. It may explain why cancer recurrence easily occurs following antiangiogenesis therapy. Thus, a combination of an antiangiogenic therapy with an antioxidant modulator is implicated for better tumor treatment.
Materials and methods
Animals and cell lines
Female NOD-SCID mice, 6–8 weeks old, were purchased from the Center of Medical Experimental Animals of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS, Beijing, China). All studies involving mice were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Tongji Medical College. Human MCF-7 and BT474 (breast cancer) cell lines were purchased from the China Center for Type Culture Collection (Beijing, China) and cultured in DMEM (Thermo Scientific) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, USA). Cells were tested for mycoplasma detection, interspecies cross contamination and authenticated by isoenzyme and short tandem repeat (STR) analyses in the Cell Resource Centre of Peking Union Medical College before the beginning of the study and spontaneously during the research. Before primary tumor tissues collected from patients, informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
Tumor models
5 × 106 MCF-7 cells were inoculated into the mammary gland of nude mice. After the tumor grew up to 50 mm3, mice were followed by intragastric administration of 60 mg/kg sunitinib per day for 35 days. In PCK2 overexpression tumor model, 3 × 105 Tet-PCK2 MCF-7 TRCs were inoculated into the mammary gland of nude mice (control vector transfected MCF-TRCs as control) and which were both treated with 2 mg/ml doxycycline in drinking water. 90 min before killing, a pipernoxazole solution (60 mg/kg) was i.v. injected to label the hypoxic region in vivo.
Immunofluorescence staining
Tumor tissues were isolated, fixed by 37% formalin, embedded in paraffin and sectioned for immunofluorescence staining. The sections from paraffin embedded tissues were prepared through dewaxing, antigen retrieval, and acid denaturation before staining. Then sections were incubated with anti-ALDH1A1(1:200, ThermoFisher, USA), anti-pimonidazole (1:50, Hypoxyprobe, USA) and anti-Ki67 (1:50, Biolegend, USA) antibody at 4 °C overnight. Slides were then incubated sequentially with fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. DAPI was stained for nucleus and sections were observed under microscope (Leica TCS SP8 STED).
2D rigid dish and 3D fibrin gel cell culture of tumor cells
For conventional 2D cell culture, tumor cells were maintained in rigid dish with DMEM cell culture medium supplemented with 10% FBS (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. TRCs culture were conducted according to our previously described method [27]. In brief, tumor cells were maintained in the conventional rigid plate. After 0.25% trypsin digestion, cells were detached and suspended in DMEM (10% FBS) and cell density was adjusted to 104 cells/ml. Fibrinogen (Searun Holdings Company, Freeport, ME, USA) was diluted into 2 mg/ml with T7 buffer (pH 7.4, 50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl). A 1:1 fibrinogen and cell solution mixture was made by mixing the same volume of the fibrinogen solution and the cell solution, resulting in 1 mg/ml fibrinogen and 5000 cells/ml in the mixture. 250 μl cell per fibrinogen mixtures was seeded into each well of a 24-well plate mixed well with pre-added 5 μl thrombin (0.1U/ml, Searun Holdings Company). The cell culture plate was then moved into 37 °C cell culture incubator incubated for 30 min. Finally, 1 ml DMEM medium containing 10% FBS was added. On day 5, the cells cultured in soft 3D fibrin gels (90 Pascal) were treated with dispase II (Roche, Swiss) for 10 min at 37 °C and then the spheroids were collected and pipetted to single cells.
Real-time PCR
RNAs were isolated with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) and the cDNAs were generated by reverse transcription (ReverTra Ace qPCR Kit, Toyobo). Real-time PCR was performed for all genes with primers on a Bio-Rad CFX Connet. The expression of mRNA for genes of interest was normalized to β-actin.
The primer sequences were as follows: hum Aldh1a1, forward 5′-CGGGAAAAGCAATCTGAAGAGGG-3′, reverse 5′-GATGCGGCTATACAACACTGGC-3′; Hum Sox2, forward 5′-GCTACAGCATGATGCAGGACCA-3′, reverse 5′-TCTGCGAGCTGGTCATGGAGTT-3′; hum CD133, forward 5′-CACTACCAAGGACAAGGCGTTC-3′, reverse 5′-CAACGCCTCTTTGGTCTCCTTG-3′; hum Oct3/4,5′-CCTGAAGCAGAAGAGGATCACC-3′, reverse 5′-AAAGCGGCAGATGGTCGTTTGG-3′; hum Klf4, forward 5′-CATCTCAAGGCACACCTGCGAA-3′, reverse 5′-TCGGTCGCATTTTTGGCACTGG-3′; hum Pck2, forward 5′-TAGTGCCTGTGGCAAGACCAAC-3′, reverse 5′-GAAGCCGTTCTCAGGGTTGATG-3′; hu-m Mdh2, forward 5′-CTGGACATCGTCAGAGCCAACA-3′, reverse 5′-GGATGATGGTCTTCCCAGCATG-3′.
Western blotting
Cell lysates preparation, SDS-PAGE, electrophoretic transfer, immunoblotting and chemiluminescent detection were performed. Antibodies and dilutions are as follows: PCK2 at 1:1000 (CST, 12940 S), NF-κB p65 (D14E12) at 1:1000 (CST, 8242 S), Phospho-NF-κB p65 (Ser536) (93H1) (CST, 3033 S), Akt (pan)(C67E7) at 1:1000 (CST, 4691 S), Phospho-Akt (Ser473) (D9E) at 1:1000 (CST, 4060 S), IDH3G at 1:1000 (Proteintech, 25848-1-AP), CS at 1:1000 (CST, 14309 S), OGDH at 1:1000 (Proteintech, 15212-1-AP), HIF-1α at 1:1000 (Gene Tex, GTX127309), HIF-2α at 1:1000 (Novus, NB100-132).
RNA interference
TRCs harvested from fibrin gels by digestion with dispase II (1 mg/ml, Roche, Mannheim, Germany) were seeded in dishes precoated with fibrin gels for 4 h. Then TRCs were transfected with siRNA via Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) in Opti-MEM Reduced Serum Medium (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MA, USA) as described by the manufacturer at 40 nM final concentration. The siRNAs were synthesized by RiboBio (Guangzhou, China), and the list is shown in Supplementary Table S1.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation
A chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay kit (Active Motif) was utilized to examine the binding of HIF-1α to the PCK2 promoter. Hypoxic and normoxic MCF-7 TRCs were fixed with 1% formaldehyde on ice to cross-link the proteins bound to the chromatin DNA. After washing, the chromatin DNA was sheared by enzymatic force to produce DNA fragments of around 200–1000 bp. The same amounts of sheared DNA were used for immunoprecipitation with a HIF-1α antibody (Gene Tex) or an equal amount of preimmune rabbit IgG (Gene Tex). The immunoprecipitate then was incubated with protein G Magnetic Beads, and the antibody- protein G Magnetic Beads complex was collected for subsequent reverse cross-linking. The same amount of sheared DNA without antibody precipitation was processed for reverse cross-linking and served as input control. DNA recovered from reverse cross-linking was used for PCR. PCR was performed with primers for the Pck2 promoter (forward, 5′-GCAGGTTGAGACAGGAGAA-3′ and reverse, 5′-TGCCATGAAATGGTGGA-3′) flanking the HIF-1α binding site at 59 °C for 36 cycles.
13C tracing by liquid chromatography Q-exactive mass spectrometry (LC-QE-MS)
For 13C tracing experiments, MCF-7 TRCs were cultured in normoxic (21% O2) and hypoxic (1% O2) conditions. On day 4 of culture, cells were washed, then cultured with [U6]-13C-glucose for another 24 h. Cells were washed twice in saline and lysed in extraction solvent (80% methanol/water) for 30 min at −80 °C. After centrifugation at 13,000 × g, 10 min at 4 °C, supernatant extracts were analyzed by LC-QE-MS as described previously. In brief, liquid chromatography was performed using a HPLC (Ultimate 3000 UHPLC) system (Thermo Fisher) equipped with An X bridge amide column (100 × 2.1 mm i.d, 3.5 μm; 97 Waters). The column temperature was maintained at 10 °C. The mobile phase A is 20 mM ammonium acetate and 15 mM ammonium hydroxide in water with 3% acetonitrile, pH 9.0, and mobile phase B is acetonitrile. The linear gradient is as follows: 0 min, 85% B; 1.5 min, 85% B, 5.5 min, 30% B; 8 min, 30% B, 10 min, 85% B, and 12 min, 85% B. The flow rate was 0.2 ml/min. Sample volumes of 5 μl were injected for LC-MS analysis. LC-MS analysis was performed on a Q-exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher) equipped with a HESI probe, and the relevant parameters are as listed: heater temperature, 120 °C; sheath gas, 30; auxiliary gas, 10; sweep gas, 3; spray voltage, 2.5 kV for the negative mode. A full scan ranges from 80 to 350 (m/z) was used. The resolution was set at 70,000. Data were quantified by integrating the area underneath the curve of each compound using X calibur Qual browser (Thermo Fisher). Each metabolite’s accurate mass ion and subsequent isotopic ions were extracted (EIC) using a 10-ppm window.
LC-MS conditions to detect succinated GSH
The experiment was performed using a HPLC (Ultimate 3000 UHPLC) system (Thermo Fisher) equipped with An X bridge amide column (100 × 2.1 mm i.d, 3.5 μm; 97 Waters). The column temperature was maintained at 10 °C. The mobile phase A is 20 mM ammonium acetate and 15 mM ammonium hydroxide in water with 3% acetonitrile, pH 9.0, and mobile phase B is acetonitrile. The linear gradient is as follows: 0 min, 90% B; 2 min, 70% B, 4 min, 50% B; 7 min, 50% B, and 9 min, 10% B. The flow rate was 0.2 ml/min. Sample volumes of 5 μl were injected for LC-MS analysis. LC-MS analysis was performed on a Q-exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher) equipped with a HESI probe, and the relevant parameters are as listed: heater temperature, 120 °C; sheath gas, 30; auxiliary gas, 10; sweep gas, 3; spray voltage, 2.5 kV for the negative mode. A full scan ranges from 80 to 350 (m/z) was used. The resolution was set at 70,000. Data were quantified by integrating the area underneath the curve of each compound using X calibur Qual browser (Thermo Fisher). Each metabolite’s accurate mass ion and subsequent isotopic ions were extracted (EIC) using a 10-ppm window. The mass spectrometry (MS) was operated in the negative mode and multiple reactions monitoring (MRM). All dependent MS parameters were optimized, based on infusion experiments. The tandem transition from the parent ions of [M-H]− to the fragment ions of 71 m/z for fumaric acid (FUM), 272 m/z for glutathione reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG), were monitored for quantitative analysis. Data were acquired and analyzed using Analyst software version 1.6. Methods to quantify succinated GSH are provided in supplemental procedures.
Oxaloacetate assay
For the analysis of the concentration of OAA, MCF-7 TRCs or control cells (1 × 106) were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and were then rapidly homogenized in 100 μl of OAA assay buffer. Samples were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 10 min to remove insoluble materials. Supernatants were assayed with the OAA Assay Kit (MAK070, Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
ROS detection
ROS levels were measured using CellROX® Green flow cytometry assay kits (Life technologies). Cells were loaded with 500 nM CellROX® Green for 30 min at 37 °C, protected from light. Cells were washed and scraped in PBS and immediately analyzed by flow cytometry, using 488 nm excitation for the CellROX® Green.
NADPH/NADP+ and GSH/GSSG assay
The NADPH/NADP+ and GSH/GSSG ratio were determined with the NADP/NADPH Quantification Colorimetric Kit and Glutathione Fluorometric Assay Kit respectively (both form BioVision). Measurements were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Aldefluor assay and flow cytometry
The Aldefluor assay was carried out according to the manufacturer’s (STEMCELL Technologies) guidelines. Briefly, cells were suspended in Aldefluor assay buffer containing an ALDH substrate, bodipy-amino acetaldehyde, at 1.5 μM, and incubated for 45 min at 37 °C. To distinguish between ALDH+ and ALDH− cells, a fraction of cells was incubated with a 10-fold excess of an ALDH inhibitor, diethylamino- benzaldehyde. This results in a significant decrease in fluorescence intensity of ALDH+ cells and were used to compensate the flow cytometer.
Luciferase assays
MCF-7 cell lines, stably integrated with a pGV238-PCK2 promoter-driven luciferase, were treated in hypoxic and normoxic for 48 h. Then, these cells were lysed and analyzed by a luciferase assay using the luciferase assay kit (Promega, WI, USA) on a GloMax Multi Plus (Promega). MCF-7 cells were transfected with 100 ng Renilla luciferase, 1 μg firefly luciferase plasmid pGV238-PCK2 promoter-luc and 1 μg of either vector or pCMV6-HIF-1α for 12 h. Then, these cells were cultured for 36 h. Cells lysates were analyzed using the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay (Promega) on a GloMax Multi Plus (Promega). Firefly luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla luciferase.
Cell cycle analysis
Cells were incubated with 20 mM BrdU (BD Bioscience) for 1 h and cell cycle analysis was performed using BD Pharmingen FITC-BrdU Flow Kits according to the manufacturer’s protocol (BD Bioscience, NJ, USA). The samples were analyzed by flow cytometry on a BD Accuri C6 Flow Cytometer (BD Bioscience). The following cell cycle phases were determined as a percentage of the total population: sub-G0 (apoptotic cells), G0/G1 (2n, BrdU-negative), S (2n to 4n, BrdU-positive) and G2/M phase (4n, BrdU-negative). The primary tumor cells were isolated from tumor or ascites and used for cell cycle analysis.
Statistics analysis
All experiments were performed at least three times and the mice were randomly divided into groups in all animal studies. To determine the colony size, at least 20 colonies from different field were measured. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. and analyzed by two-sided Student’s t-test. The P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The analysis was conducted using the GraphPad 6.0 software. Sample exclusion was never carried out. The investigator was blinded to the group allocation during the experiment and when assessing the outcome.
Data availability
The authors declare that all the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files and from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Wilson WR, Hay MP. Targeting hypoxia in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:393–410.
Bertout JA, Patel SA, Simon MC. The impact of O2 availability on human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:967–75.
Hou HG, Khan N, Du GX, Hodge S, Swartz HM. Temporal variation in the response of tumors to hyperoxia with breathing carbogen and oxygen. Med Gas Res. 2016;6:138–46.
Ostergaard L, Tietze A, Nielsen T, Drasbek KR, Mouridsen K, Jespersen SN, et al. The relationship between tumor blood flow, angiogenesis, tumor hypoxia, and aerobic glycolysis. Cancer Res. 2013;73:5618–24.
Ghajar CM. Metastasis prevention by targeting the dormant niche. Nat Rev Cancer 2015;15:238–47.
McIntyre A, Patiar S, Wigfield S, Li JL, Ledaki I, Turley H, et al. Carbonic anhydrase IX promotes tumor growth and necrosis in vivo and inhibition enhances anti-VEGF therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:3100–11.
Olcina MM, Leszczynska KB, Senra JM, Isa NF, Harada H, Hammond EM. H3K9me3 facilitates hypoxia-induced p53-dependent apoptosis through repression of APAK. Oncogene. 2016;35:793–9.
Gilkes DM, Semenza GL, Wirtz D. Hypoxia and the extracellular matrix: drivers of tumour metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:430–9.
Muz B, de la Puente P, Azab F, Azab AK. The role of hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. Hypoxia. 2015;3:83–92.
Bruna A, Rueda OM, Greenwood W, Batra AS, Callari M, Batra RN, et al. A biobank of breast cancer explants with preserved intra-tumor heterogeneity to screen anticancer compounds. Cell. 2016;167:260–74.
Koren S, Bentires-Alj M. Breast tumor heterogeneity: source of fitness, hurdle for therapy. Mol Cell. 2015;60:537–46.
Lou Y, McDonald PC, Oloumi A, Chia S, Ostlund C, Ahmadi A, et al. Targeting tumor hypoxia: suppression of breast tumor growth and metastasis by novel carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2011;71:3364–76.
Montagner M, Enzo E, Forcato M, Zanconato F, Parenti A, Rampazzo E, et al. SHARP1 suppresses breast cancer metastasis by promoting degradation of hypoxia-inducible factors. Nature. 2012;487:380–4.
Wong CC, Gilkes DM, Zhang H, Chen J, Wei H, Chaturvedi P, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 is a master regulator of breast cancer metastatic niche formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:16369–74.
Man J, Yu X, Huang H, Zhou W, Xiang C, Huang H, et al. Hypoxic induction of vasorin regulates notch1 turnover to maintain glioma stem-like cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22:104–18.
Xing F, Okuda H, Watabe M, Kobayashi A, Pai SK, Liu W, et al. Hypoxia-induced Jagged2 promotes breast cancer metastasis and self-renewal of cancer stem-like cells. Oncogene. 2011;30:4075–86.
Brooks MD, Burness ML, Wicha MS. Therapeutic implications of cellular heterogeneity and plasticity in breast cancer. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;17:260–71.
Conley SJ, Gheordunescu E, Kakarala P, Newman B, Korkaya H, Heath AN, et al. Antiangiogenic agents increase breast cancer stem cells via the generation of tumor hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:2784–9.
Samanta D, Park Y, Andrabi SA, Shelton LM, Gilkes DM, Semenza GL. PHGDH expression is required for mitochondrial redox homeostasis, breast cancer stem cell maintenance, and lung metastasis. Cancer Res. 2016;76:4430–42.
Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factors: coupling glucose metabolism and redox regulation with induction of the breast cancer stem cell phenotype. EMBO J. 2017;36:252–9.
Hitosugi T, Fan J, Chung TW, Lythgoe K, Wang X, Xie J, et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation of mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 is important for cancer metabolism. Mol Cell. 2011;44:864–77.
Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:3983–8.
Clevers H. The cancer stem cell: premises, promises and challenges. Nat Med. 2011;17:313–9.
Magee JA, Piskounova E, Morrison SJ. Cancer stem cells: impact, heterogeneity, and uncertainty. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:283–96.
Medema JP. Cancer stem cells: the challenges ahead. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15:338–44.
Chaffer CL, Brueckmann I, Scheel C, Kaestli AJ, Wiggins PA, Rodrigues LO, et al. Normal and neoplastic nonstem cells can spontaneously convert to a stem-like state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:7950–5.
Liu J, Tan Y, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Xu P, Chen J, et al. Soft fibrin gels promote selection and growth of tumorigenic cells. Nat Mater. 2012;11:734–41.
Dieter SM, Ball CR, Hoffmann CM, Nowrouzi A, Herbst F, Zavidij O, et al. Distinct types of tumor-initiating cells form human colon cancer tumors and metastases. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;9:357–65.
Liu Y, Lv J, Liu J, Liang X, Jin X, Xie J, et al. STAT3/p53 pathway activation disrupts IFN-beta-induced dormancy in tumor-repopulating cells. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:1057–73.
Liu Y, Liang X, Dong W, Fang Y, Lv J, Zhang T, et al. Tumor-repopulating cells induce PD-1 expression in CD8(+) T cells by transferring kynurenine and AhR activation. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:480–94.
Shadel GS, Horvath TL. Mitochondrial ROS signaling in organismal homeostasis. Cell. 2015;163:560–9.
Lee CU, Hahne G, Hanske J, Bange T, Bier D, Rademacher C, et al. Redox modulation of PTEN phosphatase activity by hydrogen peroxide and bisperoxidovanadium complexes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015;54:13796–800.
Papandreou I, Cairns RA, Fontana L, Lim AL, Denko NC. HIF-1 mediates adaptation to hypoxia by actively downregulating mitochondrial oxygen consumption. Cell Metab. 2006;3:187–97.
Yang C, Ko B, Hensley CT, Jiang L, Wasti AT, Kim J, et al. Glutamine oxidation maintains the TCA cycle and cell survival during impaired mitochondrial pyruvate transport. Mol Cell. 2014;56:414–24.
Zheng L, Cardaci S, Jerby L, MacKenzie ED, Sciacovelli M, Johnson TI, et al. Fumarate induces redox-dependent senescence by modifying glutathione metabolism. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6001.
Alderson NL, Wang Y, Blatnik M, Frizzell N, Walla MD, Lyons TJ, et al. S-(2-Succinyl) cysteine: a novel chemical modification of tissue proteins by a Krebs cycle intermediate. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2006;450:1–8.
Sullivan LB, Martinez-Garcia E, Nguyen H, Mullen AR, Dufour E, Sudarshan S, et al. The proto-oncometabolite fumarate binds glutathione to amplify ROS-dependent signaling. Mol Cell. 2013;51:236–48.
Luo S, Li Y, Ma R, Liu J, Xu P, Zhang H, et al. Downregulation of PCK2 remodels tricarboxylic acid cycle in tumor-repopulating cells of melanoma. Oncogene. 2017;36:3609–17.
Vincent EE, Sergushichev A, Griss T, Gingras MC, Samborska B, Ntimbane T, et al. Mitochondrial phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase regulates metabolic adaptation and enables glucose-independent tumor growth. Mol Cell. 2015;60:195–207.
Liou GY, Storz P. Reactive oxygen species in cancer. Free Radic Res. 2010;44:479–96.
Bell EL, Emerling BM, Ricoult SJ, Guarente L. SirT3 suppresses hypoxia inducible factor 1alpha and tumor growth by inhibiting mitochondrial ROS production. Oncogene. 2011;30:2986–96.
Chua YL, Dufour E, Dassa EP, Rustin P, Jacobs HT, Taylor CT, et al. Stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha protein in hypoxia occurs independently of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:31277–84.
Sullivan LB, Chandel NS. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and cancer. Cancer Metab. 2014;2:17.
Sabharwal SS, Schumacker PT. Mitochondrial ROS in cancer: initiators, amplifiers or an Achilles’ heel? Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:709–21.
Garcia-Perez C, Roy SS, Naghdi S, Lin X, Davies E, Hajnóczky G. Bid-induced mitochondrial membrane permeabilization waves propagated by local reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:4497–502.
Weyemi U, Lagente-Chevallier O, Boufraqech M, Prenois F, Courtin F, Caillou B, et al. ROS-generating NADPH oxidase NOX4 is a critical mediator in oncogenic H-Ras-induced DNA damage and subsequent senescence. Oncogene. 2012;31:1117–29.
Li Y, Luo S, Ma R, Liu J, Xu P, Zhang H, et al. Upregulation of cytosolic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase is a critical metabolic event in melanoma cells that repopulate tumors. Cancer Res. 2015;75:1191–6.
Ma R, Ji T, Zhang H, Dong W, Chen X, Xu P, et al. A Pck1-directed glycogen metabolic program regulates formation and maintenance of memory CD8+ T cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20:21–7.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81788101, 81530080, and 81601366), CAMS Initiative for Innovative Medicine (2016-I2M-1-007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.H. conceived the project. K.T., Y.Y., L.Z., J.C., P.X., H.Z., J.M., K.W., H.F., F.L., J.Z., J.X., J.J. and Y.L. performed the experiments. B.H., Y.Y., K.T., H.Z., J.M. and L.Z developed methodology. B.H., Y.Y, K.T., W.S., J.C. and L.Z. performed data analysis. K.T. provided administrative, technical, or material support. B.H., K.T. and Y.Y. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, K., Yu, Y., Zhu, L. et al. Hypoxia-reprogrammed tricarboxylic acid cycle promotes the growth of human breast tumorigenic cells. Oncogene 38, 6970–6984 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-019-0932-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-019-0932-1
This article is cited by
-
Role of natural secondary metabolites as HIF-1 inhibitors in cancer therapy
Medicinal Chemistry Research (2024)
-
Redox balance and autophagy regulation in cancer progression and their therapeutic perspective
Medical Oncology (2022)
-
Ref-1 redox activity alters cancer cell metabolism in pancreatic cancer: exploiting this novel finding as a potential target
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2021)
-
Remodeling tumor microenvironment by liposomal codelivery of DMXAA and simvastatin inhibits malignant melanoma progression
Scientific Reports (2021)