Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Temporal dynamics of neurobehavioral hormone sensitivity in a scaled-down experimental model of early pregnancy and parturition

Abstract

The hormonal changes of pregnancy and parturition can trigger robust changes in affective state, particularly among patients with a history of postpartum depression. However, more work is needed to elucidate the temporal dynamics of symptom emergence. The current study explored how quickly hormone-sensitive (HS+) individuals can be differentiated from hormone-insensitive (HS−) controls in the context of a tightly controlled experimental hormone manipulation, and which symptoms demonstrate the most rapid, consistent, and largest response during this protocol. Participants were female, non-pregnant, and euthymic, with a history of DSM-5 major depressive episode with peripartum onset (n = 15) or parous healthy controls with no psychiatric history (n = 15). Perinatal hormonal changes were simulated by inducing hypogonadism, adding back estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) to reach first-trimester levels for 8 weeks, and then subsequently withdrawing both hormones. Those reporting a 30% or greater increase during addback or withdrawal on select subscales of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) were identified as HS+. Participants provided daily ratings of symptoms throughout the study via the Daily Record of Severity of Problems. Results indicated that HS+ participants could be differentiated from HS− participants early in the hormone protocol, with many symptoms showing significantly greater change from baseline within the first week of addback. Notably, the most rapid symptom increases were observed for Anger/Irritability, Mood Swings, Overwhelm, Lethargy, Increased Appetite, Joint and Muscle Pain, and Breast Tenderness, reaching 50% of peak group contrast within the first week of hormone addback. The largest group effects were observed for Anger/Irritability, followed by Fatigue and Anxiety, and the most consistent group effects were observed for Anger/Irritability, Interpersonal Conflict, Overwhelm, and Hopelessness. Findings support the role of reproductive hormones in the onset of perinatal affective disorders. The rapid emergence of anger and irritability in HS+ participants suggests that these symptoms may be early indicators of perinatal hormone sensitivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Depiction of mean change from baseline by hormone sensitivity group for the total score.
Fig. 2: Outcomes across experimental weeks by group.
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. We use this term to refer to cisgender women and other individuals who experience the hormonal fluctuations associated with the female reproductive system, regardless of gender identity or expression.

References

  1. Canetto SS, Sakinofsky I. The gender paradox in suicide. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1998;28:1–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Swartz M, Blazer DG, Nelson CB. Sex and depression in the National Comorbidity Survey. I: Lifetime prevalence, chronicity and recurrence. J Affect Disord. 1993;29:85–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bloch M. Effects of gonadal steroids in women with a history of postpartum depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:924–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schiller CE, Walsh E, Eisenlohr-Moul TA, Prim J, Dichter GS, Schiff L, et al. Effects of gonadal steroids on reward circuitry function and anhedonia in women with a history of postpartum depression. J Affect Disord. 2022;314:176–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmidt PJ, Nieman LK, Danaceau MA, Adams LF, Rubinow DR. Differential behavioral effects of gonadal steroids in women with and in those without premenstrual syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:209–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmidt PJ, Ben Dor R, Martinez PE, Guerrieri GM, Harsh VL, Thompson K, et al. Effects of estradiol withdrawal on mood in women with past perimenopausal depression: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72:714–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Guintivano J, Manuck T, Meltzer-Brody S. Predictors of postpartum depression: a comprehensive review of the last decade of evidence. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018;61:591–603.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rudzinskas SA, Goff AC, Mazzu MA, Schiller CE, Meltzer-Brody S, Rubinow DR, et al. Intrinsically dysregulated cellular stress signaling genes and gene networks in postpartum depression. Mol Psychiatry. 2023:1–10. Online ahead of print.

  9. Markon KE, Brunette CA, Whitney BM, O’Hara MW. Mood during pregnancy: trends, structure, and invariance by gestational day. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;140:260–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Putnam KT, Wilcox M, Robertson-Blackmore E, Sharkey K, Bergink V, Munk-Olsen T, et al. Clinical phenotypes of perinatal depression and time of symptom onset: analysis of data from an international consortium. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4:477–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Watson D, O’Hara MW, Simms LJ, Kotov R, Chmielewski M, McDade-Montez EA, et al. Development and validation of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS). Psychol Assess. 2007;19:253–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Endicott J, Nee J, Harrison W. Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP): reliability and validity. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2006;9:41–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harlow SD, Gass M, Hall JE, Lobo R, Maki P, Rebar RW, et al. Executive summary of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop + 10: addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging. Menopause. 2012;19:387–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. First MB, Williams JBW, Benjamin LS, Spitzer RL. SCID-5-PD: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5® Personality Disorders. 2016.

  15. Mott SL, Schiller CE, Richards JG, O’Hara MW, Stuart S. Depression and anxiety among postpartum and adoptive mothers. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2011;14:335.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Klump KL, Keel PK, Culbert KM, Edler C. Ovarian hormones and binge eating: exploring associations in community samples. Psychol Med. 2008;38:1749–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Pearlstein T, Yonkers KA, Fayyad R, Gillespie JA. Pretreatment pattern of symptom expression in premenstrual dysphoric disorder. J Affect Disord. 2005;85:275–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Assessment of Postpartum Depressive Symptoms: The Importance of Somatic Symptoms and Irritability - J Austin Williamson, Michael W. O’Hara, Scott Stuart, Kimberly J. Hart, David Watson, 2015 (n.d.) Retrieved December 9, 2022, from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1073191114544357.

  19. Leibenluft E. Pediatric irritability: a systems neuroscience approach. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017;21:277–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ossewaarde L, van Wingen GA, Rijpkema M, Bäckström T, Hermans EJ, Fernández G. Menstrual cycle-related changes in amygdala morphology are associated with changes in stress sensitivity. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011;34:1187–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Schiller CE, Schmidt PJ, Rubinow DR. Allopregnanolone as a mediator of affective switching in reproductive mood disorders. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014;231:3557–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dantzer R, O’Connor JC, Freund GG, Johnson RW, Kelley KW. From inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system subjugates the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:46–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Balan I, Beattie MC, O’Buckley TK, Aurelian L, Morrow AL. Endogenous neurosteroid (3α,5α)3-hydroxypregnan-20-one inhibits toll-like-4 receptor activation and pro-inflammatory signaling in macrophages and brain. Sci Rep. 2019;9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37409-6.

  24. Guintivano J, Sullivan PF, Stuebe AM, Penders T, Thorp J, Rubinow DR, et al. Adverse life events, psychiatric history, and biological predictors of postpartum depression in an ethnically diverse sample of postpartum women. Psychol Med. 2018;48:1190–1200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Segre LS, O’Hara MW, Arndt S, Stuart S. The prevalence of postpartum depression: the relative significance of three social status indices. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007;42:316–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the individuals who participated in this project and made this research possible.

Funding

This research was supported by funding from the Foundation of Hope (CES), Brain & Behavior Research Foundation (CES), NIH R21MH101409 (DRR and CES), NIH T32MH093315 (DRR), NIH R01MH122446 (TEM), NIH RF1MH120843 (TEM) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, through Grant Award Number UL1TR002489 (DRR). Author DAS is supported by T32MH093315. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. The sponsors had no input into the study design; collection, analysis or interpretation of the data; in writing the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CES and DRR designed the study and oversaw the collection of study data. LS advised on the hormone administration and participant eligibility and oversaw participant safety. TEM refined hypotheses, completed data analyses, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. DAS assisted in data analyses and manuscript preparation. All authors assisted in results and have contributed to and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tory Eisenlohr-Moul.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eisenlohr-Moul, T., Swales, D.A., Rubinow, D.R. et al. Temporal dynamics of neurobehavioral hormone sensitivity in a scaled-down experimental model of early pregnancy and parturition. Neuropsychopharmacol. 49, 414–421 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-023-01687-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-023-01687-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links