Abstract
High-intensity sweet-liking has been linked to alcohol use disorder (AUD) risk. However, the neural underpinning of this association is poorly understood. To find a biomarker predictive of AUD, 140 participants (social and heavy drinkers, ages 21–26) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a monetary incentive delay (MID) task and stimulation with high (SucroseHigh)- and low-concentration sucrose, as well as viscosity-matched water. On another day after imaging, and just before free-access intravenous alcohol self-administration, participants experienced a 30 mg% alcohol prime (10 min ascent) using the Computerized Alcohol Infusion System. Principal component analysis (PCA) of subjective responses (SR) to the prime’s ascending limb generated enjoyable (SRenjoy) and sedative (SRsed) intoxication components. Another PCA created one component reflective of self-administered alcohol exposure (AE) over 90 min. Component loadings were entered as regressors in a voxel-wise general linear fMRI model, with reward type as a fixed factor. By design, peak prime breath alcohol concentration was similar across participants (29 ± 3.4 mg%). SRenjoy on the prime’s ascending limb correlated positively with [SucroseHigh > Water] in the supplementary motor area and right dorsal anterior insula, implicating the salience network. Neither SR component correlated with the brain’s response to MID. AE was unrelated to brain reward activation. While these findings do not support a relationship between alcohol self-administration and (1) subjective liking of or (2) regional brain response to an intensely sweet taste, they show that alcohol’s enjoyable intoxicating effects on the rising limb correspond with anterior insular and supplementary motor area responses to high-concentration sucrose taste. No such associations were observed with MID despite robust activation in those regions. Insula and supplementary motor area responses to intense sensations relate to a known risk factor for AUD in a way that is not apparent with a secondary (monetary) reward.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 13 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $19.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
28 August 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-023-01713-1
References
Kampov-Polevoy AB, Overstreet DH, Rezvani AH, Janowsky DS. Saccharin-induced increase in daily fluid intake as a predictor of voluntary alcohol intake in alcohol-preferring rats. Physiol Behav. 1995;57:791–5.
Kampov-Polevoy AB, Garbutt JC, Janowsky DS. Association between preference for sweets and excessive alcohol intake: a review of animal and human studies. Alcohol Alcohol. 1999;34:386–95.
Kareken DA, Dzemidzic M, Oberlin BG, Eiler WJ 2nd. A preliminary study of the human brain response to oral sucrose and its association with recent drinking. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013;37:2058–65.
Eiler WJA 2nd, Dzemidzic M, Soeurt CM, Carron CR, Oberlin BG, Considine RV, et al. Family history of alcoholism and the human brain response to oral sucrose. Neuroimage Clin. 2018;17:1036–46.
Rudenga KJ, Small DM. Ventromedial prefrontal cortex response to concentrated sucrose reflects liking rather than sweet quality coding. Chem Senses. 2013;38:585–94.
Carney MA, Tennen H, Affleck G, Del Boca FK, Kranzler HR. Levels and patterns of alcohol consumption using timeline follow-back, daily diaries and real-time "electronic interviews". J Stud Alcohol. 1998;59:447–54.
Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Tomasi D, Baler RD. Obesity and addiction: neurobiological overlaps. Obes Rev. 2013;14:2–18.
Volkow ND, Wise RA. How can drug addiction help us understand obesity? Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:555–60.
Sescousse G, Caldu X, Segura B, Dreher JC. Processing of primary and secondary rewards: a quantitative meta-analysis and review of human functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:681–96.
Abrantes AM, Kunicki Z, Braun T, Miranda R Jr., Blevins CE, Brick L, et al. Daily associations between alcohol and sweets craving and consumption in early AUD recovery: results from an ecological momentary assessment study. J Subst Abus Treat. 2022;132:108614.
Schuckit MA. Low level of response to alcohol as a predictor of future alcoholism. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:184–9.
King A, Vena A, Hasin DS, deWit H, O’Connor SJ, Cao D. Subjective responses to alcohol in the development and maintenance of alcohol use disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2021;178:560–71.
Newlin DB, Thomson JB. Alcohol challenge with sons of alcoholics: a critical review and analysis. Psychol Bull. 1990;108:383–402.
Zimmermann US, Mick I, Vitvitskyi V, Plawecki MH, Mann KF, O’Connor S. Development and pilot validation of computer-assisted self-infusion of ethanol (CASE): a new method to study alcohol self-administration in humans. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008;32:1321–8.
Plawecki MH, Decarlo R, Ramchandani VA, O’Connor S. Improved transformation of morphometric measurements for a priori parameter estimation in a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model of ethanol. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2007;2:97–110.
Ramchandani VA, Plawecki M, Li TK, O’Connor S. Intravenous ethanol infusions can mimic the time course of breath alcohol concentrations following oral alcohol administration in healthy volunteers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009;33:938–44.
Cyders MA, Plawecki MH, Corbin W, King A, McCarthy DM, Ramchandani VA, et al. To infuse or ingest in human laboratory alcohol research. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020;44:764–76.
Bucholz KK, Cadoret R, Cloninger CR, Dinwiddie SH, Hesselbrock VM, Nurnberger JI Jr., et al. A new, semi-structured psychiatric interview for use in genetic linkage studies: a report on the reliability of the SSAGA. J Stud Alcohol. 1994;55:149–58.
Sobell MB, Sobell LC, Klajner F, Pavan D, Basian E. The reliability of a timeline method for assessing normal drinker college students’ recent drinking history: utility for alcohol research. Addict Behav. 1986;11:149–61.
Costa PT, McCrae RR. Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: the NEO Personality Inventory. Psychol Assess. 1992;4:5–13.
Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.
Cyders MA, Littlefield AK, Coffey S, Karyadi KA. Examination of a short English version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Addict Behav. 2014;39:1372–6.
Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection Of Persons With Harmful Alcohol Consumption–II. Addiction. 1993;88:791–804.
Rice JP, Reich T, Bucholz KK, Neuman RJ, Fishman R, Rochberg N, et al. Comparison of direct interview and family history diagnoses of alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1995;19:1018–23.
Green B, Shaffer G, Gilmore M. A semantically-labeled magnitude scale of oral sensation with apparent ratio properties. Chem Senses. 1993;18:683–702.
Marciani L, Pfeiffer JC, Hort J, Head K, Bush D, Taylor AJ, et al. Improved methods for fMRI studies of combined taste and aroma stimuli. J Neurosci Methods. 2006;158:186–94.
Knutson B, Westdorp A, Kaiser E, Hommer D. FMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task. Neuroimage. 2000;12:20–7.
Thesen S, Heid O, Mueller E, Schad LR. Prospective acquisition correction for head motion with image-based tracking for real-time fMRI. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44:457–65.
Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. Fsl. Neuroimage. 2012;62:782–90.
Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage. 2002;17:825–41.
Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;17:143–55.
Pruim RHR, Mennes M, van Rooij D, Llera A, Buitelaar JK, Beckmann CF. ICA-AROMA: a robust ICA-based strategy for removing motion artifacts from fMRI data. Neuroimage. 2015;112:267–77.
Liu RX, Kuang J, Gong Q, Hou XL. Principal component regression analysis with SPSS. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2003;71:141–7.
Ashburner J, Barnes G, Chen C-C, Daunizeau J, Flandin G, Friston K, et al. SPM12 manual. London, UK: Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging; 2014. p. 4.
Tian Y, Margulies DS, Breakspear M, Zalesky A. Topographic organization of the human subcortex unveiled with functional connectivity gradients. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23:1421–32.
Eklund A, Nichols TE, Knutsson H. Cluster failure: why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:7900–5.
Roberts CA, Giesbrecht T, Fallon N, Thomas A, Mela DJ, Kirkham TC. A systematic review and activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of fMRI studies on sweet taste in humans. J Nutr. 2020;150:1619–30.
Centanni SW, Janes AC, Haggerty DL, Atwood B, Hopf FW. Better living through understanding the insula: why subregions can make all the difference. Neuropharmacology. 2021;198:108765.
Craig AD. Forebrain emotional asymmetry: a neuroanatomical basis? Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9:566–71.
Craig AD. How do you feel–now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:59–70.
Craig AD. Significance of the insula for the evolution of human awareness of feelings from the body. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2011;1225:72–82.
Vogt BA. Midcingulate cortex: structure, connections, homologies, functions and diseases. J Chem Neuroanat. 2016;74:28–46.
Uddin LQ, Yeo BTT, Spreng RN. Towards a universal taxonomy of macro-scale functional human brain networks. Brain Topogr. 2019;32:926–42.
Naqvi NH, Rudrauf D, Damasio H, Bechara A. Damage to the insula disrupts addiction to cigarette smoking. Science. 2007;315:531–4.
Berridge KC, Robinson TE. What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1998;28:309–69.
Volkow ND, Michaelides M, Baler R. The neuroscience of drug reward and addiction. Physiol Rev. 2019;99:2115–40.
Koob GF, Volkow ND. Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:760–73.
Yeo BT, Krienen FM, Sepulcre J, Sabuncu MR, Lashkari D, Hollinshead M, et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106:1125–65.
Grodin EN, Cortes CR, Spagnolo PA, Momenan R. Structural deficits in salience network regions are associated with increased impulsivity and compulsivity in alcohol dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;179:100–8.
Halcomb ME, Chumin EJ, Goni J, Dzemidzic M, Yoder KK. Aberrations of anterior insular cortex functional connectivity in nontreatment-seeking alcoholics. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2019;284:21–28.
Joutsa J, Moussawi K, Siddiqi SH, Abdolahi A, Drew W, Cohen AL, et al. Brain lesions disrupting addiction map to a common human brain circuit. Nat Med. 2022;28:1249–55.
Kim H. Involvement of the dorsal and ventral attention networks in oddball stimulus processing: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35:2265–84.
Corbetta M, Shulman GL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:201–15.
Vossel S, Geng JJ, Fink GR. Dorsal and ventral attention systems: distinct neural circuits but collaborative roles. Neuroscientist. 2014;20:150–9.
Uddin LQ, Supekar KS, Ryali S, Menon V. Dynamic reconfiguration of structural and functional connectivity across core neurocognitive brain networks with development. J Neurosci. 2011;31:18578–89.
Uddin LQ, Nomi JS, Hebert-Seropian B, Ghaziri J, Boucher O. Structure and function of the human insula. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;34:300–6.
Wang Y, Zhu L, Zou Q, Cui Q, Liao W, Duan X, et al. Frequency dependent hub role of the dorsal and ventral right anterior insula. Neuroimage. 2018;165:112–7.
Koob GF, Le Moal M. Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;24:97–29.
Barrett LF, Simmons WK. Interoceptive predictions in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16:419–29.
Pepino MY, Mennella JA. Effects of cigarette smoking and family history of alcoholism on sweet taste perception and food cravings in women. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31:1891–9.
Lange LA, Kampov-Polevoy AB, Garbutt JC. Sweet liking and high novelty seeking: independent phenotypes associated with alcohol-related problems. Alcohol Alcohol. 2010;45:431–6.
Kampov-Polevoy A, Garbutt JC, Janowsky D. Evidence of preference for a high-concentration sucrose solution in alcoholic men. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:269–70.
Kampov-Polevoy AB, Garbutt JC, Davis CE, Janowsky DS. Preference for higher sugar concentrations and Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire scores in alcoholic and nonalcoholic men. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998;22:610–4.
Kampov-Polevoy AB, Garbutt JC, Khalitov E. Family history of alcoholism and response to sweets. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003;27:1743–9.
Wronski M, Skrok-Wolska D, Samochowiec J, Ziolkowski M, Swiecicki L, Bienkowski P, et al. Perceived intensity and pleasantness of sucrose taste in male alcoholics. Alcohol Alcohol. 2007;42:75–9.
Krahn D, Grossman J, Henk H, Mussey M, Crosby R, Gosnell B. Sweet intake, sweet-liking, urges to eat, and weight change: relationship to alcohol dependence and abstinence. Addict Behav. 2006;31:622–31.
Kranzler HR, Sandstrom KA, Van Kirk J. Sweet taste preference as a risk factor for alcohol dependence. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:813–5.
Tremblay KA, Bona JM, Kranzler HR. Effects of a diagnosis or family history of alcoholism on the taste intensity and hedonic value of sucrose. Am J Addict. 2009;18:494–9.
Kampov-Polevoy A, Lange L, Bobashev G, Eggleston B, Root T, Garbutt JC. Sweet-liking is associated with transformation of heavy drinking into alcohol-related problems in young adults with high novelty seeking. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014;38:2119–26.
Kampov-Polevoy A, Tzoi M, Zvartau E, Crews F, Neznanov N. Sweet liking, family history of alcoholism, blood glucose level, and alcohol craving in hospitalized alcoholics. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res. 1998;22:197А–97А.
Bujarski S, Jentsch JD, Roche DJO, Ramchandani VA, Miotto K, Ray LA. Differences in the subjective and motivational properties of alcohol across alcohol use severity: application of a novel translational human laboratory paradigm. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;43:1891–9.
Sloan ME, Gowin JL, Janakiraman R, Ester CD, Stoddard J, Stangl B, et al. High-risk social drinkers and heavy drinkers display similar rates of alcohol consumption. Addict Biol. 2020;25:e12734.
Gowin JL, Sloan ME, Stangl BL, Vatsalya V, Ramchandani VA. Vulnerability for alcohol use disorder and rate of alcohol consumption. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174:1094–101.
Stangl BL, Vatsalya V, Zametkin MR, Cooke ME, Plawecki MH, O’Connor S, et al. Exposure-response relationships during free-access intravenous alcohol self-administration in nondependent drinkers: influence of alcohol expectancies and impulsivity. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017;20:31–39.
Zimmermann US, Mick I, Laucht M, Vitvitskiy V, Plawecki MH, Mann KF, et al. Offspring of parents with an alcohol use disorder prefer higher levels of brain alcohol exposure in experiments involving computer-assisted self-infusion of ethanol (CASE). Psychopharmacology. 2009;202:689–97.
Quinn PD, Fromme K. Subjective response to alcohol challenge: a quantitative review. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011;35:1759–70.
King AC, de Wit H, McNamara PJ, Cao D. Rewarding, stimulant, and sedative alcohol responses and relationship to future binge drinking. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68:389–99.
King AC, McNamara PJ, Hasin DS, Cao D. Alcohol challenge responses predict future alcohol use disorder symptoms: a 6-year prospective study. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;75:798–806.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge Azziza Ahdoot, Rachel Baum, Paige Erb, Tetlu Myint, Caron Peper, Kathryn Snyder, Christina Souert, Shreya Patel. Dr. Claire Carron, and Cari Tsinovoi for subject recruiting and management, Drs. Sarine Janetsian-Fritz and William J.A. Eiler for intellectual contributions to previous iterations of this project, Dr. Yu-Chien Wu, Dr. Sourajit Mustafi, Michele Dragoo, Traci Day, and Robert Bryant Jr. for technical assistance with MRI, Keegan Sawin and Hannah Marotta for assistance with data management and study day expertise, and Dwight Hector, Ph.D. for design refinements and construction of the gustometer. We further thank Dr. Brian Knutson for permitting us the use of his monetary incentive delay task as well as Dr. James Bjork for early discussions on its use.
Funding
This work was supported by an NIAAA fellowship T32 AA07462 to JPA, and by R01 AA022476, P60 AA007611 to DAK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: DAK, MD, JH, SJO’C, AEKK; data collection: GC, KB; analysis and interpretation of results: JPA, DAK, MD, GC, KB. Draft manuscript preparation: JPA, MD, DAK. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: the publication date for reference 21 was corrected from 2016 to 1977. The correct reference should read “Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401”.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Alessi, J., Dzemidzic, M., Benson, K. et al. High-intensity sweet taste as a predictor of subjective alcohol responses to the ascending limb of an intravenous alcohol prime: an fMRI study. Neuropsychopharmacol. 49, 396–404 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-023-01684-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-023-01684-3