Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Quality Improvement Article
  • Published:

Implementation of an ultrasound-guided approach for arterial line placements in neonates—quality improvement project

Abstract

Objective

Our goal was to improve placement success rates for peripheral arterial line (PAL) placements by introducing an ultrasound-guided (USg) approach. Our aim was to maintain success rates over 70% within 18 months.

Study design

Interventions included development of a training curriculum, and procedure standardization. Among 302 patients, 115 underwent USg catheter placement; the traditional method was used in 187 patients. Outcome measures were first-attempt and overall success rates. Process measures were proportion of PALs placed under US guidance, trainer availability, and trainee sign-off. Line complications were balancing measures. Statistical process control charts were used to monitor metrics.

Results

Sustained improvement was seen with the USg approach. The USg approach had first and overall attempt success by the trainers (i.e., independent users) of 83.7% (77/92) and 96.5% (111/115), compared to 50.3% (82/163) and 73.8% (138/187) with the traditional approach.

Conclusion

Introducing the USg approach had a significant impact on PAL placement success in neonatal patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Driver diagram for the implementation of the ultrasound-guided approach for placement of peripheral arterial lines.
Fig. 2: Statistical process control graphs for the outcome, process, and balancing measures.
Fig. 3: Success and complication rates for traditionally-placed and ultrasound-guided peripheral arterial lines.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ishii S, Shime N, Shibasaki M, Sawa T. Ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization in infants and small children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14:471–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Min JJ, Tay CK, Gil NS, Lee JH, Kim S, Kim CS, et al. Ultrasound-guided vs. palpation-guided techniques for radial arterial catheterisation in infants: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019;36:200–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vinograd AM, Chen AE, Woodford AL, Fesnak S, Gaines S, Elci OU, et al. Ultrasonographic Guidance to Improve First-Attempt Success in Children With Predicted Difficult Intravenous Access in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2019;74:19–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anantasit N, Cheeptinnakorntaworn P, Khositseth A, Lertbunrian R, Chantra M. Ultrasound Versus Traditional Palpation to Guide Radial Artery Cannulation in Critically Ill Children: A Randomized Trial. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36:2495–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. White L, Halpin A, Turner M, Wallace L. Ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation in adult and paediatric populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116:610–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schwemmer U, Arzet HA, Trautner H, Rauch S, Roewer N, Greim CA. Ultrasound-guided arterial cannulation in infants improves success rate. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006;23:476–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ganesh A, Kaye R, Cahill AM, Stern W, Pachikara R, Gallagher PR, et al. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation in children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009;10:45–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ueda K, Puangsuvan S, Hove MA, Bayman EO. Ultrasound visual image-guided vs Doppler auditory-assisted radial artery cannulation in infants and small children by non-expert anaesthesiologists: a randomized prospective study. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110:281–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang L, Wang F, Li Y, Zhao L, Xi H, Guo Z, et al. Ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014;9:e111527.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tan TYS, Petersen JAK, Zhao X, Taylor KL. Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound versus Palpation Method for Arterial Cannulation in Infants Less Than 24 Months of Age. SOJ Anesthesiol Pain Manag. 2015;2:1–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vinograd AM, Zorc JJ, Dean AJ, Abbadessa MKF, Chen AE. First-Attempt Success, Longevity, and Complication Rates of Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheters in Children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018;34:376–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang W, Li K, Xu H, Luo D, Ji C, Yang K, et al. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided technique for radial artery catheterization in pediatric populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2020;24:197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gottlieb M, Sundaram T, Holladay D, Nakitende D. Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Line Placement: A Narrative Review of Evidence-based Best Practices. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18:1047–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Munshey F, Parra DA, McDonnell C, Matava C. Ultrasound-guided techniques for peripheral intravenous placement in children with difficult venous access. Paediatr Anaesth. 2020;30:108–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang A, Hendin A, Millington SJ, Koenig S, Eisen LA, Shiloh AL. Better With Ultrasound: Arterial Line Placement. Chest. 2020;157:574–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aouad-Maroun M, Raphael CK, Sayyid SK, Farah F, Akl EA. Ultrasound-guided arterial cannulation for paediatrics. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;9:CD011364.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding for the purchase of ultrasound machines was obtained through a donation by SickKids Innovators.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MC planned, conceptualized, and designed the quality improvement study and data collection instruments, organized and led the team education, collected data, carried out the initial data analyses, drafted the initial manuscript, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. DD conceptualized the study, carried out the data analysis, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. HC and JG co-led team education, planned the study, collected the data, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. K-SL co-designed the study and data collection instruments, provided quality improvement oversight, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. HW co-designed the study, provided sponsor-level support for the project, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marko Culjat.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Culjat, M., Dzaja, D., Colangelo, H. et al. Implementation of an ultrasound-guided approach for arterial line placements in neonates—quality improvement project. J Perinatol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-023-01860-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-023-01860-9

Search

Quick links