Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

NICU Couplet Care: metrics to guide an evolving model of care

Journal of Perinatology volume 43, pages 30–34 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective

The evidence-based science of maternal and neonatal care has been rapidly changing. As a result, clinical practice and the design of physical space have evolved in order to provide neuroprotection for the baby and meet expectations of family presence and participation.

Setting

The concept and practice of NICU Couplet Care supports positive health well-being/outcomes and early relationship building between the mother-baby-father/partner.

Results

Monitoring evidence-based measures and metrics of standardized care, performance competence, neuro-physical and psychosocial outcomes, environmental design, family and staff satisfaction, and sustainability are essential to the evolution of quality, safe, efficient, effective, ethical, and cost-effective care for the mother, baby, and family.

Summary

Transparency in the dissemination of evidence, practice standards, and outcome data is important to guide parents/families and health professionals in making informed shared decisions regarding the clinical care provided and the environment where care takes place.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The references for the measures and/or metrics described in the manuscript and listed in Table 1 are cited.

References

  1. Sadick B. The new NICU unit at Beacon Children’s Hospital in South Bend, Ind., facilitates close physical contact between premature babies and their parents. NY: The Wall Street Journal; 2017, Dow, Jones & Company.

  2. Sadick B. The neonatal ICU gets a makover. New York, NY: The Wall Street Journal; 2017.

  3. White R, and the Consensus Committee to Establish Recommended Standards of NICU Design. Recommended Standards for Newborn ICU Design, 10th ed. 2023. Available from: https://nicudesign.nd.edu/nicu-standards/.

  4. Klemming S, Lilliesköld S, Westrup B. Mother-Newborn Couplet Care from theory to practice to ensure zero separation for all newborns. Acta Paediatr. 2021;110:2951–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergman NJ. Birth practices: maternal-neonate separation as a source of toxic stress. Birth Defects Res. 2019;111:1087–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Veenendaal NR, van Kempen AAMW, Broekman BFP, de Groof F, van Laerhoven H, van den Heuvel MEN, et al. Association of a zero-separation neonatal care model with stress in mothers of preterm infants. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e224514.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. de Salaberry J, Hait V, Thornton K, Bolton M, Abrams M, Shivananda S, et al. Journey to mother baby care: Implementation of a combined care/couplet model in a Level 2 neonatal intensive care unit. Birth Defects Res. 2019;111:1060–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stelwagen M, van Kempen A, Westmaas A, Vet E, Scheele F. Parents’ experiences with a model of integrated maternity and neonatal care designed to empower parents. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2021;50:181–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van Veenendaal NR, van der Schoor SRD, Broekman BFP, de Groof F, van Laerhoven H, van den Heuvel MEN, et al. Association of a family integrated care model with paternal mental health outcomes during neonatal hospitalization. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e2144720.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Redshaw M, Henderson J, Bevan C. ‘This is time we’ll never get back’: a qualitative study of mothers’ experiences of care associated with neonatal death. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e050832.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Klaus P. The devil is in the details - only what gets measured gets managed. Measuring customer experience: how to develop and execute the most profitable customer experience strategies. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 20015.

  12. Shepley MM, Smith JA, Sadler BL, White RD. The business case for building better neonatal intensive care units. J Perinatol. 2014;34:811–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Callaghan N, Dee A, Philip RK. Evidence-based design for neonatal units: a systematic review. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2019;5:6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization (WHO) Human resource strategies to improve newborn care in health facilities in low- and middle-income countries. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2020.

  15. Curley A, Jones LK, Staff L. Barriers to couplet care of the infant requiring additional care: integrative review. Healthcare. 2023;11:737.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Brockington IF, Fraser C, Wilson D. The postpartum bonding questionnaire: a validation. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2006;9:233–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Perrelli JG, Zambaldi CF, Cantilino A, Sougey EB. Mother-child bonding assessment tools. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2014;32:257–65.

  18. Erlandsson K, Dsilna A, Fagerberg I, Christensson K. Skin-to-skin care with the father after cesarean birth and its effect on newborn crying and prefeeding behavior. Birth. 2007;34:105–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reynolds LC, Duncan MM, Smith GC, Mathur A, Neil J, Inder T, et al. Parental presence and holding in the neonatal intensive care unit and associations with early neurobehavior. J Perinatol. 2013;33:636–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Agnihotri K. Places of healing. Can Fam Physician. 2022;68:487–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Guyer C, Huber R, Fontijn J, Bucher HU, Nicolai H, Werner H, et al. Very preterm infants show earlier emergence of 24-hour sleep-wake rhythms compared to term infants. Early Hum Dev. 2015;91:37–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Susilaningshi FS, Fitri SYR, Mardhiyah A, Ermiati, Hermayanti Y. Lighting and noise levels in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2019;10:878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Grigg-Damberger MM. The visual scoring of sleep in infants 0 to 2 months of age. J Clin Sleep Med. 2016;12:429–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Flacking R, Lehtonen L, Thomson G, Axelin A, Ahlqvist S, Moran VH, et al. Closeness and separation in neonatal intensive care. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101:1032–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Latour JM, Duivenvoorden HJ, Hazelzet JA, van Goudoever JB. Development and validation of a neonatal intensive care parent satisfaction instrument. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012;13:554–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lake ET, Smith JG, Staiger DO, Schoenauer KM, Rogowski JA. Measuring parent satisfaction with care in neonatal intensive care units: the EMPATHIC-NICU-USA questionnaire. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:541573.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Franck LS, Cox S, Allen A, Winter I. Measuring neonatal intensive care unit-related parental stress. J Adv Nurs. 2005;49:608–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Barnes CR, Adamson-Macedo EN. Perceived Maternal Parenting Self-Efficacy (PMP S-E) tool: development and validation with mothers of hospitalized preterm neonates. J Adv Nurs. 2007;60:550–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Spinhoven P, Ormel J, Sloekers PP, Kempen GI, Speckens AE, Van Hemert AM. A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med. 1997;27:363–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vermont Oxford Network (VON). All care is brain care: gap assessment. 2023. Available from: https://public.vtoxford.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Neuroprotective-Practice-Gap-Assessment.pd.

  31. Scher MS, Ludington-Hoe S, Kaffashi F, Johnson MW, Holditch-Davis D, Loparo KA. Neurophysiologic assessment of brain maturation after an 8-week trial of skin-to-skin contact on preterm infants. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:1812–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Pineda RG, Neil J, Dierker D, Smyser CD, Wallendorf M, Kidokoro H, et al. Alterations in brain structure and neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants hospitalized in different neonatal intensive care unit environments. J Pediatr. 2014;164:52–60.e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lyngstad LT, Steinnes S, Le Marechal F. Improving pain management in a neonatal intensive care unit with single-family room-A quality improvement project. Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2022;4:69–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. van Dijk M, Roofthooft DW, Anand KJ, Guldemond F, de Graaf J, Simons S, et al. Taking up the challenge of measuring prolonged pain in (premature) neonates: the COMFORTneo scale seems promising. Clin J Pain. 2009;25:607–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lester BM, Hawes K, Abar B, Sullivan M, Miller R, Bigsby R, et al. Single-family room care and neurobehavioral and medical outcomes in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2014;134:754–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ballantyne M, Stevens B, McAllister M, Dionne K, Jack A. Validation of the premature infant pain profile in the clinical setting. Clin J Pain. 1999;15:297–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Caskey M, Vohr B. Assessing language and language environment of high-risk infants and children: a new approach. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102:451–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mazur KM, Desmadryl M, VanAntwerp K, Ziegman C, Nemshak M, Shuman CJ. Implementing evidence-informed discharge preparedness tools in the NICU: parents’ perceptions. Adv Neonatal Care. 2021;21:E111–e119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. van Veenendaal NR, Auxier JN, van der Schoor SRD, Franck LS, Stelwagen MA, de Groof F, et al. Development and psychometric evaluation of the CO-PARTNER tool for collaboration and parent participation in neonatal care. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0252074.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. SHRM. SHRM’s Guide to Employee Engagement 2023. 2023; Available from: https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/technology/pages/employee-engagement-tool.aspx.

  41. Hagen IH, Iversen VC, Nesset E, Orner R, Svindseth MF. Parental satisfaction with neonatal intensive care units: a quantitative cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Rau J. Medicare to begin basing hospital payments on patient satisfaction scores. April 28, 2011. Available from: https://kffhealthcarenews.org/news/medicare-hospital-patient-satisfaction/.

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Carol B. Jaeger, Leslie Altimier.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Advanced Practice Nurse Programs, The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, OH, USA

    Carol B. Jaeger

  2. SSM Health: Cardinal Glennon Children’s Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA

    Leslie Altimier

Authors
  1. Carol B. Jaeger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leslie Altimier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The authors contributed equally to this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol B. Jaeger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jaeger, C.B., Altimier, L. NICU Couplet Care: metrics to guide an evolving model of care. J Perinatol 43 (Suppl 1), 30–34 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-023-01783-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-023-01783-5

Search

Advanced search

Quick links