Abstract
Objective
A comprehensive understanding of the factors contributing to perinatal blood pressure is vital to ensure optimal postnatal hemodynamic support. The objective of this study was to review existing literature on maternal and perinatal factors influencing blood pressure in neonates up to 3 months corrected age.
Methods
A systematic search of published literature in OVID Medline, OVID Embase and the COCHRANE library identified publications relating to maternal factors affecting blood pressure of neonates up to corrected age of 3 months. Summary data were extracted and compared (PROSPERO CRD42018092886).
Results
Of the 3683 non-duplicate publications identified, 44 were eligible for inclusion in this review. Topics elicited were sociodemographic factors, maternal health status, medications, smoking during pregnancy, and cord management at birth. Limited data were available for each factor. Results regarding the impact of these factors on neonatal blood pressure were inconsistent across studies.
Conclusions
There is insufficient evidence to draw definitive conclusions regarding the impact of various maternal and perinatal factors on neonatal blood pressure. Future investigations of neonatal cardiovascular therapies should account for these factors in their study design. Similarly, studies on maternal diseases and perinatal interventions should include neonatal blood pressure as part of their primary or secondary analyses.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Blood pressure (BP) among newborn infants varies considerably in the immediate postnatal period [1,2,3]. Observed neonatal BP values have been associated with birthweight, gestational age at birth, and postnatal age [4, 5]. This variability in BP makes it challenging to know whether observed BP values are too high (hypertension), too low (hypotension), increasing too quickly, or increasing too slowly for a specific neonate during postnatal adaptation under specific clinical circumstances [4, 6, 7]. There is an additional need to address neonatal hypertension which is often underdiagnosed [2, 8, 9].
The impact of additional factors beyond gestational and postnatal age on neonatal BP values is unclear [1, 4,10,11,12,13]. These include maternal condition, perinatal clinical circumstances, and any additional, yet unclear, neonatal factors. A comprehensive understanding of these factors is vital to ensuring optimal provision of hemodynamic support for neonates in the immediate postnatal period.
Understanding the cause of hypotension allows for better therapeutic choices for postnatal neonatal hypotension treatment. For example, hypotension secondary to maternal anesthesia or analgesia may require reversal agents. Choice of fluid administration (in infants of insulin-dependent diabetic mothers) and/or choice of particular vasopressors such as dobutamine, milrinone, vasopressin, or dopamine for example may also be determined based on maternal factors. Septic shock may need more than one approach. Adrenal insufficiency may require early use of hydrocortisone.
The International Neonatal Consortium (INC) was formed in 2015 with the aim of engaging members of the global neonatal community to accelerate the advancement of safe and effective innovations in therapies for neonatal infants [14]. The Consortium comprises academic, clinical, industry, and nursing stakeholders as well as patient advocate groups and regulatory bodies, who are collaborating to collate existing evidence and combine it with their professional expertize to develop consensus-based guidance that can support future clinical trial methodologies.
This paper is the second in a series of articles being produced by the hemodynamic adaptation (HA) workgroup of INC. In the first instance the group worked on best practice recommendations for neonatal BP measurement methods [15]; the second instance is this article regarding maternal factors influencing neonatal BP during the first 3 months after birth; the third instance the group is working toward establishing observed ānormalā BP ranges for neonatal infants of varying gestational ages based on a systematic review of available evidence, with the ultimate goal of establishing evidence-based approaches to assessment and management of neonatal circulation.
Methods
This systematic literature review is developed based on a pre-specified protocol developed by the INC HA workgroup prior to initiation of the review. The protocol is registered on the PROSPERO database (ID CRD42018092886) [16].
Eligibility criteria
Prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case series, and randomized controlled trials were all included during article selection. There was no limit on the publication year due to the importance of published evidence from early studies and therefore included literature from January 1946 to January 2017. Study populations included term and preterm neonates up to the corrected age of 3 months of all weights and in any health care context. Articles reporting neonatal BP as the main outcome, with analysis of maternal or perinatal factors were included. Papers with an absence of extractable data, invalid data analysis methods as determined by the statisticians in the HA workgroup and those published in a language not interpretable by any of the members of the HA workgroup were excluded.
Search strategy
This systematic review was developed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines (full checklist is available in Supplementary data) [17]. A systematic search of published literature was performed in OVID Medline, OVID Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and CINAHL. Papers were identified using the search terms (BP OR hypertension OR hypotension) AND (infant OR newborn OR neonate) AND infant [MeSH] AND (measurement OR normative) AND Humans [MeSH]). For finding articles related to cord management, additional search criteria Cord adj3 (clamp* or milk* or strip* or drain*) were used.
The initial search included papers relevant to three primary research aims developed by the HA workgroup to address neonatal HA and influencing factors during the first few hours and months after birth.
Data extraction and synthesis
Content from the papers retrieved was organized by study details and each paper was assessed against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers screened the article titles and abstracts and applied the eligibility criteria in a blinded fashion to the full article once the article was selected based on abstract review. At this stage, all studies were assigned to the relevant sub-questions of the larger overarching aim of neonatal HA developed by the HA workgroup. Papers were eligible and selected for inclusion in this systematic review if they reported on maternal factors affecting neonatal BP.
All relevant summary statistics from the final selection of papers were extracted to ExcelĀ® (Microsoft Office, Redmond, Washington, USA) regardless of statistical significance. Data comprised values for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP), recorded with mean and standard deviation (Ā±SD) where possible, as well as direction, magnitude and significance of factor association, and description of results. Descriptive comparisons of such data are reported in this study. Due to the heterogeneity in the data reported, a meta-analysis was not performed.
Assessment of risk of bias
The risk of bias was assessed by the two independent reviewers using criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and an overall risk of bias score was given for each study using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool [18, 19]. Evidence selection bias was minimized by conducting a thorough literature search in five major databases to ensure all available data on the topic were included.
Results
The initial systematic search retrieved a total of 5376 papers, of which 3683 remained after removal of duplicate titles. A detailed evaluation of the elicited papers identified 52 studies that fit the inclusion criteria and a final 44 contained relevant data to be included in this review (Fig.Ā 1). All 16 included papers related to maternal factors were prospective cohort studies published between 1976 and 2010 and descriptive characteristics are listed in TableĀ 1. All studies included in this part of the review had a low risk for bias.
PRISMA flow diagram.
Maternal sociodemographic factors
Maternal age
Gillman et al. studied 1059 full-term neonates to identify perinatal predictors of neonatal BP values, including maternal age. The authors reported a positive correlation between increasing maternal age and systolic BP of infants at 48āh of age suggesting that SBP among newborns was ~0.8āmm Hg higher for each increase of 5 years in maternal age. This correlation persisted even after controlling for potential confounding factors such as maternal high BP [20]. Zinner et al. found a positive correlation between maternal age and neonatal SBP and DBP in a subset (nā=ā576) of 837 maternal-infant pairs measured after uncomplicated vaginal or caesarean section deliveries [10]. The exact magnitude was not reported. A study by Sadoh, et al. of 473 mothers and infants found a lack of correlation between maternal age and neonatal SBP (rā=ā0.015, pā=ā0.374) [21]. However, every 10-year increase in maternal age was associated with an increase of 0.3āmmHg in neonatal SBP (neonatal SBPā=ā0.30āĆāageā+ā60.38, R2ā=ā98.6%). Pairwise interclass correlation coefficients were 0.196 for SBP and 0.157 for DBP (pā<ā0.001) [20]. A prospective cohort study of 406 term neonates reported no significant correlation between maternal age and neonatal SBP, DBP or MAP at either 24 or 48āh after birth [22]. With limited numbers of studies and conflicting results, definitive conclusions could not be made on the influence of maternal age on neonatal BP.
Maternal ethnicity/race
The effect of maternal ethnicity on neonatal BP is uncertain. Schachter et al. found higher DBP in term neonates of African-American mothers at 3 days after birth compared to white American infants (51.9āĀ±ā6.7āmmHg versus 50.1āĀ±ā6.6āmmHg; pā=ā0.047), but no significant difference in SBP was observed (76.4āĀ±ā8.3āmmHg versus 75āĀ±ā8.4āmmHg) [23]. In contrast, Zinner et al. reported no significant difference in SBP (74.1āĀ±ā9.2āmmHg and 75.1āĀ±ā11.2āmmHg respectively) or DBP (51.3āĀ±ā9.0āmmHg and 51.3āĀ±ā10.6āmmHg) in neonates born to white or African-American mothers [10]. Another prospective cohort study by Schachter et al. comparing 111 African-American with 136 white term newborn infants on day 3 after birth reported a marginally higher SBP for the African-American newborns (mean SBP 76.7āmmHg versus 74.3āmmHg; SD not reported; pā=ā0.04). However, when adjusted for number of feeds since birth, there was no longer a significant difference [24].
Maternal socioeconomic class
The mean SBP values of infants born to mothers from lower socioeconomic classes was reported to be significantly higher than that of infants of mothers from middle and high socioeconomic classes (70.8āĀ±ā8.5āmmHg (low); 68.1āĀ±ā8.2āmmHg (middle), 68.6āĀ±ā8.3āmmHg (high) pā=ā0.022) in neonates in Nigeria [21]. Schachter et al. reported no effect of socioeconomic class on neonatal BP in infants at an academic hospital in the United States [23, 24].
Maternal health status and diseases
Maternal body mass index (BMI)
Studies evaluating maternal BMI and neonatal BP in early life are scant. In a single study identified during this review, the mean SBP of infants of mothers with BMIā<ā30 was reported to be significantly lower than in infants whose mothers had BMIā>ā30 (pā=ā0.031) in a cohort of 473 Nigerian infants [21]. The exact SBP values for the newborn infants were not reported in the paper. This was also the case in some of the papers cited below and therefore exact BP values could not be reported.
Maternal blood pressure
In 2004, a study by Gillman et al. found a positive correlation between maternal BP and neonatal BP in 1059 maternal-infant pairs [20]. At 48āh after birth, there was an estimated 0.9āmmHg increase in neonatal SBP for every 10āmmHg rise in third trimester maternal SBP. Furthermore Czeszynska et al. reported that at 24āh after birth, term infants born to pre-eclamptic mothers had a significantly higher SBP (78.7āĀ±ā10.9 versus SBP 74.4āĀ±ā11.7āmmHg; pā<ā0.001) and DBP (44.4āĀ±ā10.2 versus 41.2āĀ±ā9.2āmmHg; pā<ā0.01) than those born to normotensive mothers (SBP 74.4āĀ±ā11.7; DBP 41.2āĀ±ā9.2āmmHg) [25]. DBP was higher in preterm neonates born to pre-eclamptic women (43.0āĀ±ā9.2āmmHg versus 39.3āĀ±ā8.8āmmHg; pā<ā0.001), but with no difference in SBP. Another study determined the effect of maternal BP in preterm infants (mean GA 31.5 weeks) and found that at 6āh after birth there were higher values for both SBP and DBP in preterm neonates born to mothers with hypertension compared to a control group of healthy mothers [26]. However, a subsequent paper regarding the same study sample reported no difference between preterm infants born to the normotensive and hypertensive mothers at 1 and 7 days of age. Fluctuations occurred over the days, resulting in no pattern of correlation [27].
In a 2009 study, Kent et al. found no correlation between BP in a cohort of 190 preterm and term infants born to normotensive compared with hypertensive mothers. At 14 days, there were no significant differences in SBP, DBP, or MBP in the term infant group. No difference in SBP, DBP, or MBP was found in the preterm infant group at 28 days after birth [28]. The study may have been underpowered for detecting differences. A 1983 study by Mausner et al. compared neonates born to a group of 201 normotensive mothers finding no differences between SBP and DBP in neonates between the two cohorts [29]. No significant difference in MBP in the first 3 days after birth was recorded between a small cohort of neonates born to pre-eclamptic mothers compared to normotensive mothers. Neonates of normotensive mothers had slightly higher MBP than pre-eclamptic mothers (48.1āmmHg and 47.5āmmHg, p value not provided), but this difference was not statistically significant and would not represent a clinically relevant difference [30]. With conflicting results in the identified studies, it is still uncertain whether maternal BP during and at the time of delivery has any effect on newborn BP.
Maternal diabetes
A study by Kent et al. showed no difference in SBP, DBP or MBP at 14 days post-delivery between term neonates born to mothers with diabetes compared with healthy mothers [28]. However, there were significantly higher readings for preterm neonates born to diabetic mothers at 28 days for SBP (67.4āmmHg versus 61.8āmmHg pā<ā0.001), DBP (37.7āmmHg versus 33.2āmmHg pā<ā0.02) and MAP (48.3āmmHg and 43.3āmmHg pā<ā0.01) none of which would be considered out of the normal ranges for this age group.
Maternal medications
Magnesium sulfate and ritodrine are tocolytic agents. Magnesium sulfate is also used in the treatment of severe pre-eclampsia and more recently as a neonatal neuroprotective agent in preterm deliveries. While generally safe, both of these agents can cause hypotension. Rantonen et al. [31] investigated the effect of maternal magnesium sulfate or ritodrine treatment on neonatal BP during the first 48āh after birth. They found no statistically significant difference between neonates exposed in-utero to magnesium sulfate (nā=ā13) or ritodrine (nā=ā15) and those not exposed to these agents (nā=ā12) although it was a small sample size [31].
The use of antenatal corticosteroids to prevent respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants is common. Significantly higher mean BPs (up to 5āmmHg) have been reported in the first 24āh after birth in infants treated with a single course of antenatal corticosteroids. There is also a decreased need for inotropic support and fluid resuscitation during the first 24āh [32,33,34]. The effect of repeat courses of antenatal corticosteroids is less clear. In a randomized, blinded, placebo controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of multiple courses of antenatal corticosteroids on neonatal BP and myocardial thickness, no difference was found between the placebo and repeat steroid groups [35].
Maternal smoking
A prospective cohort study by Beratis et al. demonstrated a positive correlation between the number of cigarettes smoked by mothers during pregnancy and BP in term infants within the first 72āh after birth [36]. The most marked observation was in infants born to mothers who smoked more than 15 cigarettes a day with significantly higher SBP (on average 12āmmHg higher at 72āh) and DBP (on average 8āmmHg higher at 72āh) at every time interval studied up to 24 months after birth. After 24 months, there was no significant difference in BP between infants of smoking and nonsmoking mothers [36]. Similarly, Geerts et al. [37] found that neonates of mothers who smoked during pregnancy had higher SBP (5.4āmmHg 95% CI: 1.2ā9.7; pā=ā0.01) at 2 months of age compared with neonates who were not exposed to tobacco during pregnancy. No association was found between maternal smoking during pregnancy and neonatal DBP [37]. There was no difference in SBP or DBP between neonates who were born to non-smokers and to mothers who were exposed to secondary cigarette smoke. Further analysis for differences in gender showed that male neonates born to smoking mothers had 8.6āmm Hg higher SBP than those born to nonexposed mothers (pā=ā0.04).
Chorioamnionitis
There were only two studies reporting on the association between chorioamnionitis and neonatal BP.
A prospective observational cohort study by Been et al. [36] of 271 preterm infants born at ā¤32 weeks gestation studied BP during the first 72āh after birth which was correlated with the use of antenatal steroids and histological evidence of chorioamnionitis. Infants whose mothers were diagnosed with chorioamnionitis had lower mean BPs especially during the first 12āh. In infants whose mothers received antenatal corticosteroids in the 7 days prior to delivery, the authors found an increase in mean arterial BP [36]. However, on multivariate analysis, maternal chorioamnionitis did not significantly affect neonatal BP. Antenatal corticosteroids, cord blood pH, and absence of maternal HELLP syndrome were associated with higher neonatal BP. Yanowitz et al. studied a cohort of 55 preterm infants <32 weeks gestation, including 22 with histologically confirmed maternal chorioamnionitis. They reported no significant differences in SBP at three (Ā±1) hours after birth, but lower MBP and DBP for the group with chorioamnionitis (pā<ā0.05, exact data in mmHg not provided) [38].
Cord management
The standard approach to cord management at birth has been to clamp and cut the umbilical cord early (ECC) especially for infants born prematurely or those deemed to need resuscitation. However, in the past three decades, methods to enhance the transfer of placental blood to the baby have included Delayed Cord Clamping (DCC) or Umbilical Cord Milking (UCM) [39]. Our literature searches identified 24 papers in preterm infants (nā=ā1638 infants) [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63] and four in term infants (nā=ā484 infants) [64,65,66,67] reporting on randomized trials comparing different cord management methods which are listed in TableĀ 2. Of the preterm infant studies, five studies had no extractable data but these studies were included in the review as they had BP related comments within the text for comparative purposes [40, 42, 58, 60, 61]. Two papers were based on the same original cohort but the second paper reported additional data [55, 56].
Study designs of comparison groups are listed in TableĀ 3 (see online supplementary). All studies were at high risk for performance bias as placental transfusion cannot be blinded for the practitioners. Many of the studies were unclear for other aspects of risk of bias. Certainty of the evidence (CoE) using GRADE was mostly low, mainly due to imprecision and unclear risk of bias. The studies are listed in TableĀ 2. Overall, the randomized controlled studies were difficult to compare as study designs were heterogeneous in terms of methods chosen and timing and degrees of the placental transfusion. In the preterm studies (14 studies, 850 infants), DCC timings were set from 30 to 90ās with a median of 30ā45ās.
Similar variations were seen in UCM (10 studies, 788 infants), where the number of times milked varied between two to fourfold. Furthermore, eight studies milked before clamping/cutting the cord, and two cut the cord before milking the remaining cord stump, mostly due to the perceived need to resuscitate at birth.
The definition of immediate ECC ranged from 10 to 20ās. Only four studies (484 infants) reported BP data in term infants born after receiving placental blood and these were highly heterogeneous [64,65,66,67]. The gestational age at birth for preterm infants in the eligible studies varied widely and there was inconsistency in study design.
Fourteen studies compared DCC versus ECC. These studies are described in TableĀ 2. Five studies found no difference in mean BP between groups while eight studies did report a difference (six of which reported statistically significant differences between groups in favor of DCC;), which resulted in less need for inotropes.
Seven studies looked at UCM versus ECC. Three reported no difference between cohorts [54, 60, 66]. Four reported statistically significant difference with an average increase in mean BP by as much as 6āmmHg in infants after UCM as compared to ECC. Focusing on SBP, DBP and MBP in the first hour after birth, at 4āh, and at 24āh allows for some comparison of all studies in preterm and term infants with extractable data (Fig.Ā 2aād). The illustration demonstrates a trend toward higher values for DBP and SBP with longer cord clamping times or milking of the intact cord.
a Mean blood pressure (mm Hg) and 95% confidence interval in studies of umbilical cord milking, delayed and early cord clamping in preterm infants. *Variance estimated as range/4. b Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) and 95% confidence interval in studies of umbilical cord milking, delayed & early cord clamping in preterm infants. *Variance estimated as range/4. c Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) and 95% confidence interval in studies of umbilical cord milking, delayed & early cord clamping in preterm infants. *Variance estimated as range/4. d Mean blood pressure (mm Hg) and 95% confidence interval in studies of umbilical cord milking, delayed & early cord clamping in term babies.
Two studies looked at UCM versus DCC. One reported no difference in neonatal BP. The other study reported a statistically significant difference in mean BP with higher values reported after UCM.
In term infants, two studies reported no differences in neonatal BP values between cohorts whilst the study comparing shorter DCC (60ās) versus longer DCC (300ās) reported long DCC favorable and 1 comparing UCM versus ECC showed a statistically significant difference in favor of UCM. Due to the high number of studies where the device used for BP measurements was not reported, it is not possible to link outcomes with type of BP device used.
Discussion
Only 44 papers met inclusion criteria for this systematic reviewāa relatively low number given the breadth of the topic and range of years included. However, all of the included studies which covered the topics of maternal conditions and medications had a low bias risk, and yielded results from 7172 mother-infant pairs. This literature searches and incorporated studies provide interesting data on the impact of maternal socio-demographics, health status during pregnancy, maternal smoking, and antenatal medications on neonatal BP values [5, 20, 23, 27, 28, 33, 35, 36].
The included studies present mixed results regarding the impact of maternal factors on the BP in neonates. Maternal age is reported to be positively associated with neonatal BP in some studies [10, 20], but not others [23, 24]. Similarly, studies investigating associations between maternal social class and ethnicity and neonatal BP report mixed results [21, 23, 24]. Pregnancy related maternal diseases (e.g., maternal hypertension, diabetes or other medical conditions) appear to be associated with increased neonatal BP, but to a variable extent [26, 27].
It can be concluded that maternal age, the advancement of which was shown to correlate with an increase in neonatal BP in two out of four papers, has presented as the most important associated sociodemographic factor in determining BP at birth, in this review [10, 20, 21, 24]. There are inconsistencies among the studies reporting on associations between ethnicity and socioeconomic status of mothers on neonatal BP, leading to insufficient evidence to draw conclusions on whether or not these factors have a significant impact [21, 23]. In addition, multiple factors may be occurring in individual patients and studies could have difficulty in separating out the influences.
This review found wide variations in reported associations between maternal BP and neonatal BP. Clearly positive correlations were identified in some studies, although this is inconsistent throughout all papers and there is ambiguity between findings, sometimes even within the same study [20,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Discrepancies between the studies around age of neonates at the time of BP measurements poses challenges when comparing the outcomes, due to the rapidly evolving haemodynamic state of infants over the first weeks after birth [1, 2]. Although this review highlights maternal BP as a potential factor affecting neonatal BP without strong evidence in large scale studies, no definitive conclusions can be drawn from the available evidence and therefore, further research is required. Only one study reported on the effect of BMI on neonatal BP with a significant difference between neonates of mothers with BMIā>ā30 compared with BMIā<ā30 [20]. Maternal BMI is known to affect maternal and fetal outcomes, although the exact cause of this is not fully understood [68]. In particular, infants born to mothers with high or low BMI experience more adverse effects than those of healthy mothers and are more likely to require neonatal hospital admission [68]. It would be beneficial, therefore, to investigate further the link between maternal BMI and neonatal BP. Diabetes in mothers is known to result in poorer neonatal outcomes, including cardiac pathologies. Only one paper reported on maternal diabetes and found that it was not correlated with neonatal BP [28]. Further research could provide insightful evidence around this topic [68]. Overall conclusion cannot be drawn from these single studies about the impact of maternal BMI and diabetes.
No correlation was noted, either between maternal use of magnesium sulfate or ritodrine during pregnancy and neonatal BP in the single study in which this was reported [31]. The use of antenatal steroids has been associated with higher neonatal BP [5]. Two studies reported a positive correlation between smoking during pregnancy and a higher BP of neonates [36, 37].
Overall, 24 papers related to placental transfusion in preterm infants, either through DCC or UCM, reported either no effect or an increase in BP measurement during the first 72āh after birth. The recently updated Cochrane Review found a benefit of placental transfusion in reducing the need for inotrope treatment for preterm infants during the first week after birth [39]. Not all randomized controlled trials reported on BP as a primary or secondary outcome measure, which should be correctly measured and reported in future studies. Likewise, drug studies during pregnancy should report both on shorter as well as longer term neonatal outcomes including BP and should record the cord management methods used.
Strengths of this review which increase validity include strict adherence to the PRISMA statement and pre-registering the study protocol on PROSPERO. Limitations include the small number of papers investigating each maternal factor and exclusion of papers published in a language not spoken by any member of the Consortium team. The methodological quality of included studies was disparate, particularly with regards to study design, patient population, methods of data analysis, and data presented. Potential explanations include the years elapsed since publication of several of the papers, challenges with data extractionāparticularly variation in both the age at which BP values were obtained and type of BP (systolic, diastolic, mean) measured across studies, limited information or adjustment for possible confounding variables, and study differences in the neonatal population investigated.
Implications for current practice and future research
The lack of concrete conclusions drawn from the available literature reflects the limited data on the topic surrounding the association between maternal factors and neonatal BP. The findings from this systematic review are not strong enough to impact current practice or offer generalizable information.
Future investigations of neonatal cardiovascular therapies should include both, maternal and perinatal factors in their study design and analysis and have adequate sample size. Similarly, studies on maternal diseases and perinatal interventions should include neonatal BP as part of their primary or secondary analyses. Understanding the cause of neonatal hypotension will allow for more targeted therapeutic interventions in the treatment of postpartum neonatal hypotension providing immediate effective therapies while avoiding adverse effects from ātrial and errorā approaches that utilize polypharmacy and are currently prevalent in the clinical arena.
Conclusion
The aim of this systematic review was to assess the available published data regarding the influence of maternal factors on neonatal BP values. Ambiguity in the current published literature means that there is insufficient evidence to draw definitive conclusions about the extent to which certain maternal factors correlate with neonatal BP. There are some indications that maternal age, maternal BP, maternal BMI and maternal smoking have an effect, but data were insufficient to draw definitive conclusions or recommendations. There is a need to consider influential maternal conditions and therapies in future studies in order for a more complete understanding of factors contributing to the hemodynamic status of neonates in the immediate postnatal period. This review in conjunction with additional studies through the INC will assist with the development of evidence-based standards for neonatal protocols for hemodynamics therapy studies or understanding of normal or abnormal conditions to define adverse events.
References
Pejovic B, Peco-Antic A, Marinkovic-Eric J. Blood pressure in non-critically ill preterm and full-term neonates. Pediatr Nephrol. 2006;22:249.
Dionne JM, Flynn JT. Management of severe hypertension in the newborn. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102:1176ā9.
Hulman S, Edwards R, Chen YQ, Polansky M, Falkner B. Blood pressure patterns in the first three days of life. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 1991. 1991;9:231ā4.
Lalan S, Warady B. Discrepancies in the normative neonatal blood pressure reference ranges. Blood Press Monit. 2015;20:171ā7.
Kent AL, Chaudhari T. Determinants of Neonatal Blood Pressure. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2013;15:426ā32.
Shead SL. Pathophysiology of the Cardiovascular System and Neonatal Hypotension. Neonatal Network. 2015;34:31ā40.
Baik N, Urlesberger B, Schwaberger B, Avian A, Mileder L, Schmƶlzer GM, et al. Blood Pressure during the Immediate Neonatal Transition: Is the Mean Arterial Blood Pressure Relevant for the Cerebral Regional Oxygenation? NEO. 2017;112:97ā102.
Sharma D, Farahbakhsh N, Shastri S, Sharma P. Neonatal hypertension. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30:540ā50.
Kraut EJ, Boohaker LJ, Askenazi DJ, Fletcher J, Kent AL.Neonatal Kidney Collaborative (NKC). Incidence of neonatal hypertension from a large multicenter study [Assessment of Worldwide Acute Kidney Injury Epidemiology in Neonates-AWAKEN].Pediatr Res.2018;84:279ā89.
Zinner SH, Lee YH, Rosner B, Oh W, Kass EH. Factors affecting blood pressures in newborn infants. Hypertension. 1980;2:99ā101.
Zubrow AB, Hulman S, Kushner H, Falkner B. Determinants of blood pressure in infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study. Philadelphia Neonatal Blood Pressure Study Group. J Perinatol. 1995;15:470ā9.
Launer LJ, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Relation between birth weight and blood pressure: longitudinal study of infants and children. BMJ. 1993;307:1451ā4.
Kilian K. Hypertension in neonates: causes and treatments. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2003;17:65ā74.
Turner MA, Davis JM, McCune S, Bax R, Portman RJ, Hudson LD. The International Neonatal Consortium: collaborating to advance regulatory science for neonates. Pediatr Res. 2016;80:462ā4.
Dionne JM, Bremner SA, Baygani SK, Batton B, Ergenekon E, Bhatt-Mehta V, et al. Method of Blood Pressure Measurement in Neonates and Infants: a Systematic Review and Analysis. J Pediatrics. 2020;221:23ā31.e5.
PROSPERO. International prospective register of systematic reviews. What are the observed ranges of blood pressure by gestational ages, birth weight, and age after birth without treatment? A systematic review. [Internet]. [cited 2020 Mar 5]. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=92886
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med [Internet]. 2009 Jul [cited 2019 Aug 7];6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2707599/
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Internet]. [cited 2020 Feb 11]. /handbook/current
Pluye P, Robert E, Cargo M, Bartlett G, OāCathain A, Griffiths F, et al. (2011). Proposal: a mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies, reviews. MIXED METHODS APPRAISAL TOOL (MMAT) VERSION 2018. mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic2.
Gillman MW, Rich-Edwards JW, Rifas-Shiman SL, Lieberman ES, Kleinman KP, Lipshultz SE. Maternal age and other predictors of newborn blood pressure. J Pediatrics. 2004;144:240ā5.
Sadoh WE, Ibhanesehbor SE, Monguno AM, Gubler DJ. Predictors of newborn systolic blood pressure. West Afr J Med. 2010;29:86ā90.
Sedaghat N, Ellwood D, Shadbolt B, Kecskes Z, Falk MC, Brussel T, et al. The effect of mode of delivery and anaesthesia on neonatal blood pressure. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48:172ā8.
Schachter J, Kuller LH, Perfetti C. Blood pressure during the first two years of life. Am J Epidemiol. 1982;116:29ā41.
Schachter J, Lachin J, Wimberly F. Newborn Heart Rate and Blood Pressure: relation to Race and to Socioeconomic Class. Psychosom Med. 1976;38:390ā8.
Czeszynska M, Pankiewicz E, Hnatyszyn G, Konefal H, Girzejowska M. Neonatal blood pressure in relation to pregnancy-induced hypertension in mothers. Prenat Neonatal Med. 1999;4:66ā70.
Hegyi T, Carbone MT, Anwar M, Ostfeld B, Hiatt M, Koons A, et al. Blood pressure ranges in premature infants. I. The first hours of life. J Pediatrics. 1994;124:627ā33.
Hegyi T, Anwar M, Carbone MT, Ostfeld B, Hiatt M, Koons A, et al. Blood Pressure Ranges in Premature Infants: II. The First Week of Life. Pediatrics. 1996;97:336ā42.
Kent AL, Shadbolt B, Hu E, Meskell S, Falk MC, Dahlstrom JE. Do maternal- or pregnancy-associated disease states affect blood pressure in the early neonatal period? Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49:364ā70.
Mausner JS, Hiner LB, Hediger ML, Gabrielson MO, Levison SP. Blood pressure of infants of hypertensive mothers: a two-year follow-up. Int J Pediatr Nephrol. 1983;4:255ā61.
HernĆ”ndez JL, Malacara JM, Horta DomĆnguez I, Ricavar FE, de JesĆŗs HernĆ”ndez HernĆ”ndez J, HernĆ”ndez Arriaga JL, et al. TensiĆ³n arterial en reciĆ©n nacidos de 1.500 a 2.500 gramos: estudio comparativo entre hijos de madres con pre-eclampsia y madres sanas [Arterial tension in newborns weighing 1,500 to 2,500 g: a comparative study between children of mothers with pre-eclamp.]. Rev EspaƱola PediatrĆa 1999. 1999;55:122ā6.
Rantonen TH, Grƶnlund JU, Jalonen JO, Ekblad UU, KƤƤpƤ PO, Kero PO, et al. Comparison of the effects of antenatal magnesium sulphate and ritodrine exposure on circulatory adaptation in preterm infants. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2002;22:13ā7.
Demarini S, Dollberg S, Hoath SB, Ho M, Donovan EF. Effects of Antenatal Corticosteroids on Blood Pressure in Very Low Birth Weight Infants During the First 24āh of Life. J Perinatol. 1999;19:419ā25.
MoĆÆse AA, Wearden ME, Kozinetz CA, Gest AL, Welty SE, Hansen TN. Antenatal steroids are associated with less need for blood pressure support in extremely premature infants. Pediatrics. 1995;95:845ā50.
Been JV, Kornelisse RF, Rours IGIJG, Passos VL, De Krijger RR, Zimmermann LJI. Early Postnatal Blood Pressure in Preterm Infants: effects of Chorioamnionitis and Timing of Antenatal Steroids. Pediatr Res. 2009;66:571ā6.
Mildenhall L, Battin M, Bevan C, Kuschel C, Harding JE. Repeat Prenatal Corticosteroid Doses Do Not Alter Neonatal Blood Pressure or Myocardial Thickness: Randomized, Controlled Trial. Pediatrics. 2009;123:e646ā52.
Beratis NG, Panagoulias D, Varvarigou A. Increased blood pressure in neonates and infants whose mothers smoked during pregnancy. J Pediatrics. 1996;128:806ā12.
Geerts Caroline C, Grobbee Diederick E, van der Ent Cornelis K, de Jong Brita M, van der Zalm Marieke M, van Putte-Katier Nienke, et al. Tobacco Smoke Exposure of Pregnant Mothers and Blood Pressure in Their Newborns. Hypertension. 2007;50:572ā8.
Yanowitz TD, Ann Jordan J, Gilmour CH, Towbin R, Bowen A, Roberts JM, et al. Hemodynamic Disturbances in Premature Infants Born after Chorioamnionitis: association with Cord Blood Cytokine Concentrations. Pediatr Res. 2002;51:310ā6.
Rabe H, Gyte GM, DĆazāRossello JL, Duley L. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003248.pub4/full. [cited 2020 Feb 11].
Backes C, Huang H, Iams J, Bauer J, Giannone P. Timing of umbilical cord clamping among infants born at 22 through 27 weeksā gestation. J Perinatol. 2016;36:35ā40.
Baenziger O, Stolkin F, Keel M, Siebenthal K, von, Fauchere J-C, Kundu SD, et al. The Influence of the Timing of Cord Clamping on Postnatal Cerebral Oxygenation in Preterm Neonates: a Randomized, Controlled Trial. Pediatrics. 2007;119:455ā9.
Dipak NK, Nanavati RN, Kabra NK, Srinivasan A, Ananthan A. Effect of delayed cord clamping on hematocrit, and thermal and hemodynamic stability in preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2017;54:112ā5.
Dong X-Y, Sun X-F, Li M-M, Yu Z-B, Han S-P. [Influence of delayed cord clamping on preterm infants with a gestational age of <32 weeks]. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2016;18:635ā8.
Gokmen Z, Ozkiraz S, Tarcan A, Kozanoglu I, Ozcimen E, Ozbek N. Effects of delayed umbilical cord clamping on peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells in premature neonates. J Perinat Med. 2011;39:323ā9.
Hofmeyr GJ, Bolton KD, Bowen DC, Govan JJ. Periventricular/intraventricular haemorrhage and umbilical cord clamping. Find Hypothesis S Afr Med J. 1988;73:104ā6.
Kugelman A, Borenstein-Levin L, Riskin A, Chistyakov I, Ohel G, Gonen R, et al. Immediate versus Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping in Premature Neonates Born < 35 Weeks: a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study. Am J Perinatol. 2007;24:307ā15.
Mercer JS, McGrath MM, Hensman A, Silver H, Oh W. Immediate and Delayed Cord Clamping in Infants Born Between 24 and 32 Weeks: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Perinatol. 2003;23:466ā72.
Mercer JS, Vohr BR, McGrath MM, Padbury JF, Wallach M, Oh W. Delayed Cord Clamping in Very Preterm Infants Reduces the Incidence of Intraventricular Hemorrhage and Late-Onset Sepsis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1235ā42.
Mercer JS, Erickson-Owens DA, Vohr BR, Tucker RJ, Parker AB, Oh W, et al. Effects of Placental Transfusion on Neonatal and 18 Month Outcomes In Preterm Infants: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr. 2016;168:50ā55.e1.
Nelle M, Fisher S, Conze S, Beedgen B, Grischke EM, Linderkamp O. Effects of Late Cord Clamping on Circulation in Prematures (vlbwi). Pediatr Res. 1998;44:454ā454.
Oh W, Fanaroff AA, Carlo WA, Donovan EF, McDonald SA, Poole WK. Effects of Delayed Cord Clamping in Very Low Birth Weight Infants. J Perinatol. 2011;31:S68ā71.
Popat H, Robledo KP, Sebastian L, Evans N, Gill A, Kluckow M, et al. Interobserver agreement and image quality of functional cardiac ultrasound measures used in a randomised trial of delayed cord clamping in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child - Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103:F257ā63.
Rabe H, Wacker A, HĆ¼lskamp G, Hƶrnig-Franz I, Schulze-Everding A, Harms E, et al. A randomised controlled trial of delayed cord clamping in very low birth weight preterm infants. Eur J Pediatr. 2000;159:775ā7.
El-Naggar W. The Effect of Umbilical Cord Milking on Hemodynamic Status of Preterm Infants: a Randomized Controlled Trial [Internet]. clinicaltrials.gov; 2017 Mar [cited 2021 Jun 3]. Report No.: NCT01487187. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01487187
Hosono S, Mugishima H, Fujita H, Hosono A, Minato M, Okada T, et al. Umbilical cord milking reduces the need for red cell transfusions and improves neonatal adaptation in infants born at less than 29 weeksā gestation: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child - Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93:F14ā9.
Hosono S, Mugishima H, Fujita H, Hosono A, Okada T, Takahashi S, et al. Blood pressure and urine output during the first 120 h of life in infants born at less than 29 weeksā gestation related to umbilical cord milking. Arch Dis Child - Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94:F328ā31.
Katheria AC, Leone TA, Woelkers D, Garey DM, Rich W, Finer NN. The Effects of Umbilical Cord Milking on Hemodynamics and Neonatal Outcomes in Premature Neonates. J Pediatrics. 2014;164:1045ā.e1.
Katheria AC, Truong G, Cousins L, Oshiro B, Finer NN. Umbilical Cord Milking Versus Delayed Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants. Pediatrics. 2015;136:61ā9.
Kumar B, Upadhyay A, Gothwal S, Jaiswal V, Joshi P, Dubey K. Umbilical cord milking and hematological parameters in moderate to late preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2015;52:753ā7.
March M, Hacker M, Parson A, Modest A, de Veciana M. The effects of umbilical cord milking in extremely preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2013;33:763ā7.
Rabe H, Jewison A, Fernandez Alvarez R, Crook D, Stilton D, Bradley R, et al. Milking Compared With Delayed Cord Clamping to Increase Placental Transfusion in Preterm Neonates: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:205ā11.
Mohan GR, Shashidhar A, Chandrakala BS, Nesargi S, Rao PNS. Umbilical cord milking in preterm neonates requiring resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2018;130:88ā91.
Song S-Y, Kim Y, Kang B-H, Yoo H-J, Lee M. Safety of umbilical cord milking in very preterm neonates: a randomized controlled study. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2017;60:527ā34.
Erickson-Owens DA, Mercer JS, Oh W. Umbilical cord milking in term infants delivered by cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2012;32:580ā4.
Jaiswal P, Upadhyay A, Gothwal S, Singh D, Dubey K, Garg A, et al. Comparison of two types of intervention to enhance placental redistribution in term infants: randomized control trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2015;174:1159ā67.
Katheria AC, Brown MK, Faksh A, Hassen KO, Rich W, Lazarus D, et al. Delayed Cord Clamping in Newborns Born at Term at Risk for Resuscitation: a Feasibility Randomized Clinical Trial. J Pediatrics. 2017;187:313ā.e1.
Upadhyay A, Gothwal S, Parihar R, Garg A, Gupta A, Chawla D, et al. Effect of umbilical cord milking in term and near term infants: randomized control trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:120.e1ā120.e6.
Kalk P, Guthmann F, Krause K, Relle K, Godes M, Gossing G, et al. Impact of maternal body mass index on neonatal outcome. Eur J Med Res. 2009;14:216ā22.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Igor Brbre, Clinical Librarian, for conducting the structured literature searches. The authors would like to acknowledge the following INC Members who took time to review and comment on the paper: Gerri Baer, Jon Davis, Jennifer Degl, Deb Discenza, Wakako Eklund, Christine Gleason, Carole Kenner, Victoria Niklas, Aprile Pilon, Mary Short, and Norma Vivas.
Funding
Critical Path Institute is supported by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and is 62% funded by FDA/HHS totalling $14,448,917, and 38% percent funded by non-government source(s) totalling $8,669,646 The contents are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of, nor an endorsement, by FDA/HHS, or the U.S. Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
HR, JMD, BB, AK, EE, LPK, ED, DAF, SB and SAB conceptualized the study design, and contributed to the literature reviews and data extractions including translations of non-English language papers and wrote parts of the paper. SAB and SB created the data analysis plan and analyzed the extracted data. AA and RM reviewed the papers and extracted data and drafted parts of the paper. All authors agreed to the final version of the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
One co-author is an employee of a pharmaceutical company, as noted in the list of affiliations. No products are discussed in this paper. The consortium aims to improve methods that can be applied to evaluating the safety and effectiveness of any medical product for neonates and is consequently drug agnostic.
Additional information
Publisherās note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articleās Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the articleās Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rabe, H., Bhatt-Mehta, V., Bremner, S.A. et al. Antenatal and perinatal factors influencing neonatal blood pressure: a systematic review. J Perinatol 41, 2317ā2329 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-01169-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-01169-5
This article is cited by
-
Blood pressure normative values in preterm infants during postnatal transition
Pediatric Research (2023)
-
Oscillometric arterial blood pressure in haemodynamically stable neonates in the first 2Ā weeks of life
Pediatric Nephrology (2023)
