Abstract
Autophagy plays an important role in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Cellular repressor of E1A-stimulated genes 1 (CREG1) is an important myocardial protective factor. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects and mechanisms of CREG1 in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Male C57BL/6 J mice, Creg1 transgenic mice and cardiac-specific knockout mice were used to establish a type 2 diabetes model. Small animal ultrasound, Masson’s staining and western blotting were used to evaluate cardiac function, myocardial fibrosis and autophagy. Neonatal mouse cardiomyocytes (NMCMs) were stimulated with palmitate, and the effects of CREG1 on NMCMs autophagy were examined. CREG1 deficiency exacerbated cardiac dysfunction, cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in mice with diabetic cardiomyopathy, which was accompanied by exacerbated autophagy dysfunction. CREG1 overexpression improved cardiac function and ameliorated cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in diabetic cardiomyopathy by improving autophagy. CREG1 protein expression was decreased in palmitate-induced NMCMs. CREG1 knockdown exacerbated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and inhibited autophagy. CREG1 overexpression inhibited cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and improved autophagy. LAMP2 overexpression reversed the effect of CREG1 knockdown on palmitate-induced inhibition of cardiomyocyte autophagy. CREG1 inhibited LAMP2 protein degradation by inhibiting the protein expression of F-box protein 27 (FBXO27). Our findings indicate new roles of CREG1 in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Diabetes is a chronic disease that is prevalent worldwide, and type 2 diabetes is the most common type. Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in patients with type 2 diabetes1,2. Diabetic cardiomyopathy is a fatal and chronic complication of diabetes in the absence of coronary artery disease, arterial hypertension, and valvular disease. Diabetic cardiomyopathy is characterized by myocardial fibrosis leading to ventricular dilation and hypertrophy, which contributes to diastolic and systolic dysfunction and eventually results in heart failure3,4,5.
The main mechanisms of diabetic cardiomyopathy in type 2 diabetes include insulin resistance, cardiomyocyte apoptosis, oxidative stress, autophagy dysfunction, and inflammation6,7,8,9. In particular, autophagy dysfunction plays an important role in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy10,11,12. Autophagy is a highly conserved process of lysosome-mediated organelle and protein degradation that maintains cellular homeostasis and metabolism. Autophagy is characterized by the formation of phagophores, which engulf cytoplasmic components destined for turnover and mature into double-membrane vesicles called autophagosomes, which fuse with lysosomes to form autolysosomes, allowing for cargo degradation13,14. During the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy in type 2 diabetes, cardiomyocyte autophagy is inhibited, damaged organelles cannot be degraded, and harmful metabolites accumulate in cardiomyocytes, resulting in myocardial hypertrophy, myocardial fibrosis, and cardiac dysfunction15,16. Therefore, identifying the key molecules that regulate cardiomyocyte autophagy after diabetic cardiomyopathy could provide new strategies for the prevention and treatment of diabetic cardiomyopathy.
Cellular repressor of E1A-stimulated genes 1 (CREG1) is a small glycosylated protein that is widely expressed in a variety of cells and tissues17,18,19,20. Studies have revealed that CREG1 is highly expressed in the heart and plays important roles in myocardial protection21,22,23,24. Recombinant CREG1 protein inhibits myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis caused by angiotensin II by promoting myocardial autophagy25. Recombinant CREG1 protein protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by improving myocardial autophagy and inhibiting apoptosis21 and ameliorates myocardial fibrosis after myocardial infarction by inhibiting the phenotypic switching of cardiac fibroblasts22. Tai et al. reported that CREG1 improved cardiac function by regulating cardiomyocyte autophagy in rats with diabetic myocardial infarction24. However, whether CREG1 can ameliorate cardiac fibrosis and improve cardiac function in diabetic cardiomyopathy remains unknown.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of CREG1 in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy and to clarify the underlying molecular mechanisms.
Material and methods
Animals
Eight-week-old male C57BL/6J mice, Creg1 transgenic mice (Creg1-TG), Creg1 cardiac knockout mice (Creg1-CKO), and their littermate controls were purchased from GemPharmatech Co., Ltd. (China). Briefly, to construct Creg1-CKO mice, mice bearing Creg1-floxed alleles (Creg1fl/fl) were crossed with transgenic mice expressing Cre recombinase under the cardiac muscle-specific α-MHC promoter22. In addition, Creg1 transgenic mice (Creg1-TG) were crossed with C57BL/6 J mice. Genomic DNA isolated from the tails of Creg1-CKO and Creg1fl/fl mice, Creg1-TG and wild type (WT) was used to genotype the animals by PCR. The primers used to identify Creg1-TG mice were listed in Supplementary Table 1. All male mice used had a C57BL/6 J background and were housed in a pathogen-free animal facility with an ambient temperature of 23 °C ± 2 °C and a dark-light cycle of 12-12 h.
Experimental protocol
Eight-week-old male C57BL/6J, Creg1-TG, Creg1-CKO mice and their littermate controls were divided into two groups: the control and diabetic model (DM)26,27 groups. The DM group was fed a high-fat diet (HFD; fat provided 60% of total calories; Research Diet, USA). After 4 weeks of HFD feeding, the mice were intraperitoneally injected with streptozotocin (STZ, 20 mg/kg/d) for 5 days, and the cumulative dose of STZ was 100 mg/kg. The control group was fed a normal diet (ND, fat provided 10% of total calories; Research Diet) and was intraperitoneally injected with an equal amount of citrate buffer for 5 days. The criterion for the successful generation of DM was fasting blood glucose >16.7 mmol/L. C57BL/6 J mice (n = 6 for the control group and n = 8 for the DM group), Creg1-TG and Creg1fl/fl mice (n = 7 for each group), Creg1-CKO mice and WT mice (n = 6 for the control group and n = 8 for the DM group) were initially included in the experiment. Mice without elevated fasting blood glucose after STZ injection were excluded from the experiment. The mice were sacrificed after 24 weeks of HFD feeding. Animal care was approved by the Ethics Committee on the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the General Hospital of the Northern Theater Command.
Determination of cardiac function
Cardiac function was evaluated using small animal ultrasound (Canada) at different time points during the development of DM (0, 12, and 24 weeks). The mice were sedated by 2% isoflurane inhalation. Cardiac dimensions and function were evaluated via M-mode echocardiography using an echocardiography system with an Ms-400 linear transducer21. The left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and end-systolic diameter were measured on the parasternal left ventricular long axis view. The mitral valve blood flow E/A ratio (E/A), ejection fraction (EF%), and fractional shortening (FS%) were calculated using computer algorithms. All measurements were performed in a blinded manner.
Hematoxylin & eosin (HE) staining and Masson’s trichrome staining
Heart sections were dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, cut into 3-μm-thick sections using a microtome, and mounted on slides. HE staining was performed according to routine protocols25. The stained sections were scanned using a microscope at 1× magnification (Zeiss, Germany). Masson’s trichrome staining was performed on paraffin sections of heart tissues to evaluate myocardial fibrosis. The stained sections were scanned using a microscope at 40× magnification (Zeiss).
Cell culture and cell transfection
Neonatal mouse cardiomyocytes (NMCMs) were isolated from 1- to 3-day-old C57BL/6J mice using a primary cardiomyocyte isolation kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). NMCMs were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. The cells were plated in six-well plates and cultured at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. We constructed a cell model of lipotoxicity by culturing NMCMs in medium containing palmitate (PA, Sigma Aldrich, USA). PA was dissolved in bovine serum albumin (BSA), and PA was added to NMCMs growth medium for 24 h at a final concentration of 400 μM. PA-free BSA was used as a control.
To establish CREG1 knockdown cells, Creg1 small interfering RNA and its control (si-Creg1 and si-control; RIBOBIO, China) were transfected into NMCMs using Lipofectamine™ RNAiMAX transfection reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The target sequence for si-Creg1 was GCCACTATCTCCACAATAA. To establish CREG1-overexpressing cells, Creg1 and control adenoviruses (adCREG1 and adcon, the adenovirus titer for adCREG1 was 5.53 × 1010 PFU/ml, and the adenovirus titer for adcon was 1.58 × 1011 PFU/ml, OBIO Technology, China) were added to the culture medium and incubated for 24 h. Accordingly, si-Creg1 or adCREG1 was administered to cells in full growth medium to examine the effect of CREG1 on cardiomyocyte autophagy during PA stimulation. At 24 h after adenovirus transduction or siRNA transfection, the efficiency of gene overexpression and knockdown was assessed by western blotting and real-time PCR.
CREG1-knockdown or CREG1-overexpressing NMCMs were starved in serum-free medium for 12 h and then pretreated with or without the autophagy agonist resveratrol (Res, 25 μM; Sigma Aldrich), autophagy inhibitor chloroquine (CQ, 20 μM; Sigma Aldrich) and bafilomycin A1 (Baf A1, 200 nM; MCE, USA) for 24 h.
For the rescue experiments, lysosomal-associated membrane protein 2 (LAMP2)-overexpressing adenovirus and its control (adLAMP2 and adcon, the adenovirus titer for adLAMP2 was 1.58 × 1011 PFU/ml, and the adenovirus titer for adcon was 1.58 × 1011 PFU/ml, OBIO Technology) were added to cells in the si-Creg1 group, followed by PA stimulation for an additional 24 h. To establish F-box protein 6 (FBXO6)- or F-box protein 27 (FBXO27)-overexpressing cells, Fbxo6 or Fbxo27 cDNA sequences were inserted into the pcDNA3.1(+) plasmid, and the stop codon was replaced with a 3× flag tag (GENEWIZ, China). FBXO6- or FBXO27-overexpressing plasmids were transfected into NMCMs or H9C2 cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Three independent experiments were conducted.
Wheat germ agglutinin staining (WGA) and F-actin staining
To analyze the cross-sectional area of cardiomyocytes, heart tissues were stained with WGA (Sigma Aldrich) according to the manufacturer’s instructions28. To analyze the size of cardiomyocytes in vitro, NMCMs were stained with F-actin (Sigma Aldrich) for 30 min and washed with PBS, and the nuclei were stained with DAPI. The stained sections were scanned using a microscope at 40× magnification (Zeiss).
Lipid analysis
The levels of lipids, including triglyceride, total cholesterol, non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), in the myocardium of DM mice and cardiomyocytes stimulated with PA were determined by spectrophotometric methods using commercial assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Biotech, China)29.
RNA extraction and real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted from cells or tissues using the TRIzol method (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The mRNA expression of Creg1, Lamp2, Fbxo6, and Fbxo27 in the myocardium or cardiomyocytes was measured by real-time PCR. Gapdh was used as the loading control. The primers listed in Supplementary Table 2 were purchased from Sangong Biotech (China). Amplification was performed as follows: 95 °C for 30 s, 30 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 30 s, and a dissolution curve from 65 °C to 95 °C (+0.5 °C one cycle). The levels of relative gene expression were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method. The data presented were the average of at least 3 independent experiments.
Western blotting
Total proteins were isolated from heart tissues or cells with RIPA lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The proteins (30 μg) were separated by SDS‒PAGE (Bio-Rad) and transferred to PVDF membranes, which were blocked with 5% skim milk. Then, the membranes were incubated at 4 °C overnight with the corresponding primary antibodies and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. The primary antibodies used were CREG1 (Abcam, ab191909), LAMP2 (Abcam, ab13524), LC3B (Cell Signaling Technology, USA, 3868 S), P62 (Abcam, ab109012), beclin 1 (Cell Signaling Technology, 3495 S), cathepsin D (Abcam, ab75852), FBXO6 (Bioss, China, bs-6415R), and FBXO27 (Bioss, bs-9089R). GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology, 2118 S) was used as the internal reference.
Immunoprecipitation (IP) and mass spectrometry
Total protein was collected from FBXO6- or FBXO27-overexpressing H9C2 cells using PierceTM IP lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The protein (1000 μg) was incubated with IgG (Abcam) or flag (Sigma Aldrich) antibodies and protein A/G beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific) overnight at 4 °C. The beads were washed three times and resuspended in 2× loading buffer. The expression of CREG1 and LAMP2 in the IP supernatant was examined by western blotting. The experiments were performed in triplicate.
Total protein was collected from adCREG1-expressing 3T3 fibroblasts using PierceTM IP lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The cell lysate (1000 μg) was incubated with IgG (Abcam) or flag (Sigma Aldrich) antibodies and protein A/G beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific) overnight at 4 °C. The beads were washed three times and resuspended in 2× loading buffer. The suspension was subjected to mass spectrometry (BioMiao Biological Technology Co., Ltd, China) to screen for proteins that might interact with CREG1.
Immunofluorescence staining
NMCMs were plated on glass coverslips overnight, and cells treated with or without PA were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min and blocked with goat serum for 30 min. Then, NMCMs were incubated with specific primary antibodies against CREG1 (Sigma Aldrich) and LAMP2 (Abcam) overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 2 h at room temperature. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI for 5 min. Images were captured using a fluorescence microscope at 40× magnification (Zeiss).
Measurement of fluorescent LC3 puncta
NMCMs were transfected with adCREG1, adLAMP2, si-Creg1, si-Lamp2, FBXO27 -overexpressing plasmids or corresponding controls for 24 h, transduced with an autophagy double-labeled adenovirus (mRFP-GFP-LC3; Hanbio Biotechnology, China, HB-AP210001), and stimulated with PA for an additional 24 h30. The cells were harvested, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and then observed using a fluorescence microscope at 40× magnification (Zeiss). The double-labeled adenovirus could distinguish autophagosomes (GFP- and mRFP-positive LC3 puncta, which were yellow) and autolysosomes (GFP-negative and mRFP-positive LC3 puncta, which were red).
Lysosome labeling with LysoTracker Red DND-99
NMCMs were differentially stimulated and stained with LysoTracker Red DND-99 (300 nM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, L-7582) for 10 min according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The excess LysoTracker was removed with culture medium. The cells were fixed and permeabilized. Coverslips were mounted using ProLong Gold antifade reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Images were captured using a fluorescence microscope at 40× magnification (Zeiss) and analyzed using Image-Pro Plus v6.0 software.
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was performed using SPSS v22.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). The data were shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Differences between experimental and control groups were calculated using unpaired Student’s t tests. Differences among three or more groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
CREG1 protein levels were decreased in the myocardium of type 2 diabetic mice
Compared with that in the control group, body weight in the DM group was increased after 4 weeks, while the level of fasting blood glucose was increased after 8 weeks (p < 0.01, Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). In addition, abnormal glucose and insulin tolerance in the DM group was observed at 24 weeks (Supplementary Fig. 1c, d). Compared with the control group, the DM group exhibited decreased diastolic and systolic functions at 24 weeks (E/A: 1.45 ± 0.14 vs. 2.17 ± 0.39; EF%: 38.87% ± 2.87% vs. 53.5% ± 1.60%; FS%: 18.56% ± 1.63% vs. 27.22% ± 1.04%, p < 0.01, Supplementary Fig. 1e–g). The ratio of heart weight (HW) to tibial length (TL) was used to evaluate myocardial hypertrophy. The HW/TL ratio was increased in the DM group (Supplementary Fig. 1h). HE and Masson’s trichrome staining revealed that myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis occurred in the diabetic cardiomyopathy group at 24 weeks (Supplementary Fig. 1i, j). These results indicated that DM was successfully established.
To investigate the association between cardiac dysfunction and CREG1 expression, we evaluated the mRNA and protein expression of CREG1 in the myocardium of C57BL/6J mice at different time points. The protein expression of CREG1 was significantly decreased at 12 weeks, and the degree of the decrease was most apparent at 24 weeks (p < 0.01, Supplementary Fig. 1k, l); however, Creg1 mRNA levels were unaltered (p > 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 1m). These results confirmed that the decrease in CREG1 expression occurred earlier than cardiac dysfunction in DM.
CREG1 deficiency exacerbated cardiac dysfunction in type 2 diabetic mice
To clarify the role of CREG1 in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy, Creg1-CKO and Creg1fl/fl mice were used in this study. Body weight and fasting blood glucose levels in Creg1-CKO and Creg1fl/fl mice in the DM group were increased compared with those in the control group (p < 0.01, Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). However, no difference was observed in body weight and the fasting blood glucose levels between Creg1-CKO and Creg1fl/fl mice in the DM group (p > 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). The HW/TL ratio was significantly higher in the DM group of Creg1fl/fl mice than in the control group. The HW/TL ratio in the Creg1-CKO DM group was higher than that in the of Creg1fl/fl DM group (p < 0.01, Supplementary Fig. 2c).
Compared with the control group, the DM group of Creg1-CKO and Creg1fl/fl mice had decreased diastolic and systolic functions at 24 weeks (p < 0.01, Fig. 1a–c). Interestingly, diastolic function (E/A) and systolic function (EF% and FS%) were significantly worse in the DM group of Creg1-CKO mice than in the DM group of Creg1fl/fl mice at 24 weeks (E/A: 1.20 ± 0.03 vs. 1.41 ± 0.08; p < 0.05; EF%: 30.74% ± 1.51% vs. 37.39% ± 1.18%, p < 0.01; FS%: 14.37% ± 0.78% vs. 17.85% ± 0.60%, p < 0.01; Fig. 1a–c).
CREG1 deficiency exacerbated myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis in type 2 diabetic mice
In the absence of pathological stimulation, there was mild myocardial hypertrophy in Creg1-CKO mice compared with Creg1fl/fl mice; however, no significant difference in fibrosis was observed between Creg1-CKO and Creg1fl/fl mice (Fig. 1d–h). Interestingly, myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis occurred in the DM group of Creg1-CKO and Creg1fl/fl mice at 24 weeks compared with the control group (Fig. 1d–h). Moreover, myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis in the DM group of Creg1-CKO mice were more severe than those in the DM group of Creg1fl/fl mice (Fig. 1d–h). Furthermore, the mRNA levels of hypertrophic (Anp and Myh7) and fibrotic (Tgfβ) markers in the DM group of Creg1-CKO mice were significantly higher than those in the DM group of Creg1fl/fl mice (p < 0.05, Fig. 1i).
CREG1 deficiency exacerbated myocardial autophagy dysfunction in type 2 diabetic mice
The expression of LC3II and P62 in Creg1-CKO mice was higher than that in Creg1fl/fl mice, while the expression of LAMP2 was decreased in Creg1-CKO mice (p < 0.05, Fig. 1j, k). The expression levels of beclin 1, cathepsin D and LAMP2 were significantly decreased in the DM group of Creg1-CKO and Creg1fl/fl mice compared with those in the control group. Conversely, the expression levels of LC3II and P62 were significantly increased in the DM group of Creg1-CKO and Creg1fl/fl mice (p < 0.01, Fig. 1j, k). The expression levels of beclin 1 and cathepsin D were not changed in the DM group of Creg1-CKO mice compared with those in the DM group of Creg1fl/fl mice; however, the expression levels of LC3II and P62 were significantly increased, whereas the expression of LAMP2 was significantly decreased in the DM group of Creg1-CKO mice (p < 0.01, Fig. 1j, k).
To further clarify the role of CREG1 deficiency in cardiac autophagy in vivo, the protein levels of LC3II, P62 and LAMP2 in the myocardium of Creg1-CKO and Creg1fl/fl mice with or without colchicine treatment were examined. Colchicine increased the protein expression of LC3II, P62 and LAMP2 in Creg1fl/fl mice and Creg1-CKO mice. Compared with that in the Creg1fl/fl + colchicine group, the protein expression of LC3II and P62 was significantly increased in the myocardium in the Creg1-CKO + colchicine group (Supplementary Fig. 2d, e). These results indicated that CREG1 deficiency exacerbated cardiac autophagy dysfunction.
CREG1 overexpression improved cardiac function in type 2 diabetic mice
To further clarify the role of CREG1 overexpression in diabetic cardiomyopathy, we used Creg1-TG and WT mice to establish DM. We generated Creg1-TG mice (Supplementary Fig. 3a–c) and found that the mRNA and protein levels of CREG1 were significantly increased in the myocardium of Creg1-TG mice compared with those in the WT mice (p < 0.01, Supplementary Fig. 3d–f). Body weight and fasting blood glucose levels were significantly increased in the DM group of Creg1-TG and WT mice compared with those in the control group. In addition, body weight and fasting blood glucose levels in the DM group of Creg1-TG mice were slightly lower than those in the DM group of WT mice (p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 3g, h). The HW/TL ratio was significantly higher in the DM group of WT mice than in the control group. The HW/TL ratio in the DM group of Creg1-TG mice was lower than that in the DM group of WT mice (p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 3i).
Diastolic and systolic function were decreased in the DM group of Creg1-TG and WT mice at 24 weeks compared with that in the control group (p < 0.01, Fig. 2a–c). Interestingly, diastolic (E/A) and systolic (EF% and FS%) functions were improved in the DM group of Creg1-TG mice compared with those in the DM group of WT mice (E/A: 1.83 ± 0.05 vs. 1.41 ± 0.03, respectively; EF%: 46.79% ± 1.06% vs. 40.73% ± 0.84%, respectively; FS%: 23.19% ± 0.62% vs. 19.75% ± 0.49%, respectively; p < 0.01, Fig. 2a–c).
CREG1 overexpression alleviated myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis in type 2 diabetic mice
At baseline, myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis were not observed in the Creg1-TG and WT groups. However, myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis occurred in the DM group of Creg1-TG and WT mice at 24 weeks (Fig. 2d–h). Interestingly, myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis were alleviated in the DM group of Creg1-TG mice compared with those in the DM group of WT mice (Fig. 2d–h). In addition, the mRNA levels of Anp, Myh7 and Tgfβ in the DM group of Creg1-TG mice were significantly lower than those in the DM group of WT mice (p < 0.05, Fig. 2i).
CREG1 overexpression improved myocardial autophagy in type 2 diabetic mice
Under physiological conditions, the expression of LC3II and P62 in the myocardium of Creg1-TG mice was lower than that in WT mice, whereas the expression of LAMP2 was increased in Creg1-TG mice (p < 0.05, Fig. 2j, k). Interestingly, the expressions of beclin 1 and cathepsin D in the DM group of Creg1-TG mice did not change compared with those in the DM group of WT mice; however, the expression of LC3II and P62 was significantly decreased, whereas that of LAMP2 was significantly increased in the DM group of Creg1-TG mice (p < 0.01, Fig. 2j, k).
CREG1 knockdown increased triglyceride and NEFA levels, and CREG1 overexpression inhibited triglyceride and NEFA levels in the myocardium in type 2 diabetic mice
Compared with those in Creg1fl/fl mice, triglyceride, NEFA and total cholesterol levels were significantly increased in the DM group of Creg1fl/fl mice (p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 4a–c). Moreover, triglyceride and NEFA levels in the DM group of Creg1-CKO mice were higher than those in the DM group of Creg1fl/fl mice (p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). However, HDL-C and LDL-C levels did not change in the DM group (p > 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 4d, e,i, j). In addition, compared with those in WT mice, triglyceride, NEFA and total cholesterol levels were significantly increased in the DM group of WT mice (p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 4f–h). Triglyceride and NEFA levels were significantly decreased in the DM group of Creg1-TG mice compared to those in the DM group of WT mice (p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 4f, g).
CREG1 knockdown exacerbated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in vitro
Previous studies have reported that lipotoxicity is the most important mechanism in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy31,32,33,34. Therefore, we constructed a cell model of lipotoxicity by culturing NMCMs in medium containing PA. PA dramatically reduced CREG1 protein expression in NMCMs (p < 0.01, Fig. 3a–c). To determine whether CREG1 knockdown enhanced PA-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, NMCMs were transfected with si-Creg1 and then stimulated with PA. We first examined the mRNA and protein expression of CREG1 in NMCMs after si-Creg1 transfection. Compared with that in the si-control group, the mRNA and protein expression of CREG1 was decreased in the si-Creg1 group (Supplementary Fig. 5a–c). PA increased the mRNA levels of Anp and Myh7 and increased cardiomyocyte size (p < 0.01, Fig. 3d–f). Interestingly, CREG1 knockdown exacerbated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in response to PA stimulation (p < 0.05, Fig. 3d–f).
CREG1 knockdown exacerbated autophagy dysfunction in cardiomyocytes in vitro
Compared with those in the si-control group, an increase in the expression of LC3II and P62 and a decrease in the expression of LAMP2 were observed in the si-Creg1 group (p < 0.01, Fig. 3g, h). In addition, PA increased the expression of LC3II and P62 and decreased the expression of beclin 1, cathepsin D, and LAMP2 (p < 0.01, Fig. 3g, h). Interestingly, we observed that the expression levels of LC3II and P62 were increased, whereas that of LAMP2 was decreased in the si-Creg1 + PA group compared with the si-control+PA group (p < 0.01, Fig. 3g, h).
In addition, we examined the formation of autophagosomes and autolysosomes in CREG1-knockdown NMCMs. Normal NMCMs exhibited basal autophagy with few autophagosomes and autolysosomes. Compared with that in the si-control group, the proportion of red puncta (autolysosomes) and yellow puncta (autophagosomes) was significantly increased in the si-Creg1 group (p < 0.01, Fig. 3i, j). After PA stimulation, the proportion of autolysosomes and autophagosomes was also increased (p < 0.01, Fig. 3i, j). Furthermore, the proportion of autolysosomes was significantly decreased, whereas the proportion of autophagosomes was increased in the si-Creg1 + PA group compared with the si-control+PA group (p < 0.05, Fig. 3i, j).
Following PA stimulation, the number of acidic lysosomes was significantly reduced in the si-Creg1 and si-control groups (p < 0.01, Supplementary Fig. 5d, e); however, no difference in the number of acidic lysosomes was observed between the si-Creg1 and si-control groups with or without PA stimulation (p > 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 5d, e).
CREG1 overexpression inhibited cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and improved autophagy in vitro
To further determine whether CREG1 overexpression improved PA-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and autophagy dysfunction, we infected NMCMs with adCREG1 and stimulated them with PA. CREG1 overexpression inhibited cardiomyocyte hypertrophy by decreasing cardiomyocyte size and inhibiting the mRNA levels of hypertrophic markers (p < 0.05, Fig. 4a–c). Compared with that in the adcon group, the expression of LC3II and P62 was decreased, whereas that of LAMP2 was increased in the adCREG1 group (p < 0.01, Fig. 4d, e). Moreover, CREG1 overexpression inhibited the expression of LC3II and P62 but increased the expression of LAMP2 in response to PA stimulation (p < 0.01, Fig. 4d, e).
In the context of PA stimulation, CREG1 overexpression significantly increased the proportion of autolysosomes but decreased the proportion of autophagosomes (p < 0.05, Fig. 4f, g). LysoTracker Red staining indicated that CREG1 overexpression did not affect the number of acidic lysosomes in NMCMs with or without PA stimulation (p > 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 5f, g).
CREG1 knockdown increased the levels of triglycerides and NEFA, and CREG1 overexpression inhibited the levels of triglycerides and NEFA in cardiomyocytes stimulated with PA
Compared with those in the si-control group, the levels of triglyceride, NEFA, total cholesterol, and LDL-C were significantly increased in the si-control+PA group (p < 0.01, Supplementary Fig. 6a, b). Moreover, triglyceride and NEFA levels in the si-Creg1+PA group were significantly higher than those in the si-control+PA group (p < 0.01, Supplementary Fig. 6a). However, HDL-C levels did not change in any group (p > 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 6b, d). Triglyceride and NEFA levels were significantly lower in the adCREG1+PA group than in the adcon+PA group (p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 6c).
CREG1 overexpression ameliorated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy by activating autophagy
To clarify whether autophagic flux blockade accounted for the accumulation of LC3II and P62, we used different drugs to further inhibit autophagy. CQ (an autophagic degradation inhibitor that changes the lysosomal pH35) was incubated with NMCMs for 24 h, and the effect of CQ on NMCM autophagy was examined. CQ increased the expression of LC3II, P62 and LAMP2 under normal and PA conditions (Supplementary Fig. 7a–d, Fig. 5a, b), and the extent of this increase in the PA group was much smaller than that in the normal group. With or without PA stimulation, CREG1 overexpression inhibited the expression of LC3II and P62 induced by CQ (Supplementary Fig. 7c, d, Fig. 5a, b). In addition, we examined the accumulation of autophagosomes and autolysosomes. Compared with that in the control group, CQ treatment increased autophagosomes in NMCMs and inhibited autolysosomes with or without PA stimulation, and these effects were reversed by CREG1 overexpression (Supplementary Fig. 7e, f, Fig. 5c, d). In addition, CQ exacerbated cardiac hypertrophy in response to PA stimulation, which was inhibited by CREG1 overexpression (p < 0.01, Fig. 5e–g).
To further examine whether the increase in LC3II and P62 reflects the enhancement of autophagosome formation or accumulation of autophagosomes due to suppressed autolysosome formation, we also used bafilomycin A1 (200 nM), a late autophagic flux inhibitor36. Baf A1 increased the expression of LC3II and P62 under normal and PA conditions, and this effect was inhibited by CREG1 overexpression (Supplementary Fig. 8a–d). Bafilomycin A1 increased the number of autophagosomes and inhibited the number of autolysosomes in NMCMs in response to PA stimulation, and these effects were reversed by CREG1 overexpression (Supplementary Fig. 8e, f). These results indicated that the fusion and degradation of autophagosomes and lysosomes were blocked by PA stimulation, and autophagic flux was interrupted in NMCMs stimulated with PA. CREG1 overexpression improved autophagic flux in NMCMs.
Resveratrol inhibited cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in CREG1-knockdown NMCMs
A previous study demonstrated that resveratrol may be a potential therapeutic agent for diabetic cardiomyopathy through the autophagy signaling pathway37; therefore, we administered resveratrol to CREG1-knockdown NMCMs and examined the expression of autophagy-related proteins and the index of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. The effect of resveratrol on NMCM autophagy was first examined under basal conditions. Resveratrol increased the protein expression of CREG1, LC3II and LAMP2 and decreased the expression of P62, indicating that resveratrol could activate autophagy in NMCMs with or without PA stimulation (Supplementary Fig. 9a–d). In addition, resveratrol inhibited cardiac hypertrophy in the si-control+PA and si-Creg1 + PA groups (p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 9e–g).
CREG1 improved cardiomyocyte autophagy by increasing LAMP2 expression in vitro
Previous studies have shown that knocking down CREG1 inhibits the binding of M6P/IGF2R to LAMP2, whereas CREG1 overexpression has the opposite effect21. Here, we examined the interaction between CREG1 and LAMP2. There was an interaction between CREG1 and LAMP2 in cardiomyocytes (Fig. 6a). Immunofluorescence staining showed that CREG1 and LAMP2 were colocalized in NMCMs, and this effect was reduced by PA stimulation (Fig. 6b). To clarify the upstream relationship between CREG1 and LAMP2, we infected NMCMs with adCREG1 or adLAMP2 and examined the mRNA and protein expression of CREG1 and LAMP2. Although the mRNA level was unaltered, LAMP2 protein expression was significantly increased in the adCREG1 group (Fig. 6c–e). However, neither the mRNA nor protein levels of CREG1 were affected by LAMP2 overexpression (Fig. 6f–h).
To assess the role of LAMP2 in mediating the effects of CREG1 on the cardiomyocyte autophagy, the effects of LAMP2 overexpression on NMCMs autophagy under basal conditions were first examined. No difference in autophagy occurred between the adLAMP2 and adcon groups (Supplementary Fig. 10a–d). Interestingly, the expression of LC3II and P62 was significantly inhibited in the si-Creg1+adLAMP2+PA group compared with that in the si-Creg1 + PA group (p < 0.01, Fig. 6i, j). In addition, LAMP2 overexpression inhibited the accumulation of autophagosomes and increased the accumulation of autolysosomes in CREG1-knockdown NMCMs (p < 0.05, Fig. 6k, l).
CREG1 increased LAMP2 protein expression via a FBXO27-dependent pathway
To examine the role of CREG1 in the protein degradation of LAMP2, we treated CREG1-knockdown NMCMs with CQ or MG132 and measured LAMP2 expression. Compared with that in the control group, LAMP2 protein expression was decreased in the si-Creg1 group. LAMP2 protein expression was increased in the CQ group and MG132 group. Interestingly, compared with that in the si-Creg1 group, LAMP2 protein expression was significantly increased in the si-Creg1 + CQ group and si-Creg1 + MG132 group. The extent of the increase in LAMP2 protein expression in the si-Creg1 + MG132 group was significantly greater than that in the si-Creg1 + CQ group (p < 0.01, Fig. 7a, b). Moreover, compared with that in the control group, LAMP2 protein expression was significantly increased in the PA + CQ group and PA + MG132 group, especially in the PA + MG132 group (p < 0.01, Supplementary Fig. 10e, f). These results indicated that LAMP2 might be mainly degraded via the proteasome pathway under pathological conditions.
CREG1 might interact with FBXO6, which is a component of the ubiquitin E3 ligase in 3T3 fibroblast cells (Supplementary Fig. 11a). A previous study revealed that LAMP2 could be degraded by FBXO27 via a proteasome-dependent pathway when lysosomal function was impaired38. Therefore, we investigated the interaction between CREG1 and FBXO6 or FBXO27 in cardiomyocytes. Our results demonstrated a lack of any direct interaction between CREG1 and FBXO6 or FBXO27 (Supplementary Fig. 11b, c). We also examined the effect of CREG1 overexpression on the mRNA and protein expression of FBXO6 and FBXO27 in NMCMs. We found that CREG1 did not affect the mRNA and protein expression of FBXO6; however, CREG1 overexpression significantly inhibited FBXO27 protein expression (p < 0.01, Fig. 7c–e). In addition, we observed that FBXO27 overexpression did not affect the mRNA and protein expression of CREG1 (p > 0.05, Fig. 7f–h) but could inhibit LAMP2 protein expression (p < 0.01, Fig. 7g, h). The IP results revealed an interaction between FBXO27 and LAMP2 in cardiomyocytes (Supplementary Fig. 11d). Oddly, we discovered that the mRNA and protein expression of FBXO27 was not affected by LAMP2 overexpression (p > 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 11e–g).
To clarify the role of FBXO27 in mediating the effects of CREG1 on cardiomyocyte autophagy, rescue experiments were performed. FBXO27 overexpression significantly inhibited autophagy in NMCMs by increasing the expression of LC3II and P62 and decreasing LAMP2 expression. In addition, the effects of CREG1 on NMCM autophagy were reversed by FBXO27 overexpression (p < 0.05, Fig. 7i, j). These results revealed that CREG1 increased LAMP2 protein expression via a FBXO27-dependent pathway (Fig. 7k).
Discussion
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide39. Diabetic cardiomyopathy is a fatal and chronic complication of diabetes. Autophagy is an important protective mechanism in cells that plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of diabetic cardiomyopathy40,41,42. In our study, the expression of LC3II and P62 was increased, whereas the expression of beclin 1, LAMP2, and cathepsin D was inhibited in the myocardium during diabetic cardiomyopathy and in PA-induced NMCMs. In addition, autophagic flux was inhibited in NMCMs following PA stimulation. These results indicated that autophagy was inhibited during the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy, which was consistent with the findings of previous studies43,44,45. Our results showed that CREG1 expression was decreased in the myocardium during diabetic cardiomyopathy preceding cardiac dysfunction, indicating a negative correlation between the decrease in CREG1 expression and the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy. To determine whether CREG1 plays an important role in diabetic cardiomyopathy, Creg1-CKO or Creg1-TG mice were used in our study. CREG1 deficiency exacerbated cardiac dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis in diabetic conditions. In contrast, improvements in cardiac function and a decrease in myocardial fibrosis were observed in CREG1-overexpressing diabetic mice.
Autophagy mainly includes the formation of autophagosomes, the fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes, and the digestion and degradation of metabolites by lysosomes45. Autophagy dysfunction in cardiomyocytes in diabetic cardiomyopathy mainly occurs at the stage of autophagy‒lysosome fusion, which is characterized as the reduction and dysfunction of autophagolysosomes46. Our results showed that CREG1 deficiency increased the expression of LC3II and P62 and inhibited LAMP2 expression in the myocardium of diabetic mice. CREG1 overexpression inhibited LC3II and P62 and increased LAMP2 expression. However, CREG1 did not influence beclin 1 or cathepsin D expression. The effects of CREG1 on cardiomyocyte autophagy were examined in vitro. In response to PA stimulation, CREG1 deficiency increased LC3II and p62 expression and decreased LAMP2 expression. Conversely, CREG1 overexpression inhibited the expression of LC3II and p62 but increased LAMP2 expression. Autophagic flux is the gold standard to determine whether autophagy is enhanced or inhibited. In this study, CREG1 overexpression in cardiomyocytes increased the formation of autolysosomes and inhibited the formation of autophagosomes, and these effects were reversed by the autophagy inhibitor CQ or bafilomycin A1, whereas CREG1 deficiency increased the formation of autophagosomes and inhibited the formation of autolysosomes. These results revealed that CREG1 improved cardiomyocyte autophagy by promoting the fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes under diabetic conditions.
LAMP2, which is a lysosomal membrane protein, mediates the fusion of lysosomes and autophagosomes and reflects the function of lysosomes47. LAMP2 deficiency inhibits the fusion of lysosomes and autophagosomes in skeletal muscle and the heart, leading to the accumulation of autophagic vacuoles and the suppression of autophagic flux48. In our study, LAMP2 overexpression did not affect cardiomyocyte autophagy under basal conditions; however, LAMP2 overexpression could improve autophagy in cardiomyocytes with CREG1 deficiency or PA stimulation. These results were consistent with a previous study49. Interestingly, CREG1 increased LAMP2 protein expression without affecting Lamp2 mRNA expression, indicating that CREG1 could inhibit the protein degradation of LAMP2. FBXO27 is a substrate recognition subunit of the SKP1/CUL1/F-box protein (SCF) ubiquitin ligase complex. FBXO27 can bind and ubiquitinate glycoproteins. In response to lysosomal damage, FBXO27 regulates the autophagic machinery by ubiquitinating lysosomal proteins, including LAMP2. In the present study, CREG1 overexpression increased LAMP2 expression by inhibiting FBXO27 protein expression. In addition, there was an interaction between FBXO27 and LAMP2 in cardiomyocytes. These results indicated that CREG1 increased LAMP2 protein expression via a FBXO27-dependent pathway.
This study has several limitations. First, Creg1-TG mice were used in our study. Rescue animal models did not exhibit Creg1 cardiomyocyte-specific overexpression in vivo. Second, as an extracellular glycoprotein, CREG1 is expected to signal through a surface receptor. However, the CREG1 receptor has not yet been discovered. Finally, when autophagy selectively degrades mitochondria, it is termed mitophagy50 and has been reported to be implicated in cardiovascular disorders51,52. In our previous study53, CREG1 was involved in the regulation of skeletal muscle cell function through mitophagy; however, whether the physiological and pathological role of CREG1 in diabetic cardiomyopathy occurs through mitophagy needs to be investigated in future studies.
Our study revealed that CREG1 could ameliorate the progression of diabetic cardiomyopathy by improving autophagy in cardiomyocytes. These findings provide a new theoretical basis for the prevention and treatment of diabetic cardiomyopathy.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the published article.
References
Zheng, Y., Ley, S. H. & Hu, F. B. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 14, 88–98 (2018).
Schmidt, A. M. Diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 39, 558–568 (2019).
Jia, G., Hill, M. A. & Sowers, J. R. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: an update of mechanisms contributing to this clinical entity. Circ. Res. 122, 624–638 (2018).
Murtaza, G. et al. Diabetic cardiomyopathy - a comprehensive updated review. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 62, 315–326 (2019).
Tan, Y. et al. Mechanisms of diabetic cardiomyopathy and potential therapeutic strategies: preclinical and clinical evidence. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 17, 585–607 (2020).
Parim, B., Sathibabu Uddandrao, V. V. & Saravanan, G. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: molecular mechanisms, detrimental effects of conventional treatment, and beneficial effects of natural therapy. Heart Fail Rev. 24, 279–299 (2019).
Jia, G., Whaley-Connell, A. & Sowers, J. R. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: a hyperglycaemia- and insulin-resistance-induced heart disease. Diabetologia 61, 21–28 (2018).
Chen, Y. et al. Distinct types of cell death and the implication in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Front. Pharmacol.11, 42 (2020).
Yu, L. et al. Activation of silent information regulator 6 signaling attenuates myocardial fibrosis by reducing tgfβ1-smad2/3 signaling in a type 2 diabetic animal model. Cardiol. Discov. 2, 6–12 (2022).
Hu, X. et al. Pathophysiological fundamentals of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Compr. Physiol. 7, 693–711 (2017).
Dewanjee, S. et al. Autophagy in the diabetic heart: a potential pharmacotherapeutic target in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Ageing Res. Rev. 68, 101338 (2021).
Kobayashi, S. & Liang, Q. Autophagy and mitophagy in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1852, 252–261 (2015).
Varga, Z. V. et al. Interplay of oxidative, nitrosative/nitrative stress, inflammation, cell death and autophagy in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1852, 232–242 (2015).
Parzych, K. R. & Klionsky, D. J. An overview of autophagy: morphology, mechanism, and regulation. Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 20, 460–473 (2014).
Dikic, I. & Elazar, Z. Mechanism and medical implications of mammalian autophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 349–364 (2018).
Wu, X., Liu, Z., Yu, X. Y., Xu, S. & Luo, J. Autophagy and cardiac diseases: therapeutic potential of natural products. Med. Res. Rev. 41, 314–341 (2021).
Ghobrial, G., Araujo, L., Jinwala, F., Li, S. & Lee, L. Y. The structure and biological function of CREG. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 6, 136 (2018).
Liu, Y. et al. DNA hypermethylation: a novel mechanism of CREG gene suppression and atherosclerogenic endothelial dysfunction. Redox. Biol. 32, 101444 (2020).
Zhang, Q. Y. et al. The novel intracellular protein CREG inhibits hepatic steatosis, obesity, and insulin resistance. Hepatology 66, 834–854 (2017).
Liu, J. et al. CREG1 promotes lysosomal biogenesis and function. Autophagy 17, 4249–4265 (2021).
Song, H. et al. CREG protects from myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by regulating myocardial autophagy and apoptosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Mol. Basis Dis. 1863, 1893–1903 (2017).
Liu, D. et al. CREG ameliorates the phenotypic switching of cardiac fibroblasts after myocardial infarction via modulation of CDC42. Cell Death Dis. 12, 355 (2021).
Zhang, J. et al. Transplantation of CREG modified embryonic stem cells improves cardiac function after myocardial infarction in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 503, 482–489 (2018).
Tai, T. T. et al. CREG improves cardiac function by regulating cardiomyocytes’ autophagy in diabetic myocardial infarction rats. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 24, 11233–11242 (2020).
Yan, C. H. et al. CREG1 ameliorates myocardial fibrosis associated with autophagy activation and Rab7 expression. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1852, 353–364 (2015).
Gilbert, E. R., Fu, Z. & Liu, D. Development of a nongenetic mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Exp. Diabetes Res. 2011, 416254 (2011).
Srinivasan, K., Viswanad, B., Asrat, L., Kaul, C. L. & Ramarao, P. Combination of high-fat diet-fed and low-dose streptozotocin-treated rat: a model for type 2 diabetes and pharmacological screening. Pharmacol. Res. 52, 313–320 (2005).
Cheng, X. et al. Overexpression of kininogen-1 aggravates oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in DOX-induced cardiotoxicity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 550, 142–150 (2021).
Qian, P. et al. A novel oral glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist protects against diabetic cardiomyopathy via alleviating cardiac lipotoxicity induced mitochondria dysfunction. Biochem. Pharmacol. 182, 114209 (2020).
Zhang, J. et al. Cardioprotective effect of MLN4924 on ameliorating autophagic flux impairment in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by Sirt1. Redox. Biol. 46, 102114 (2021).
Yin, Z. et al. MiR-30c/PGC-1beta protects against diabetic cardiomyopathy via PPARalpha. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 18, 7 (2019).
Wu, M. X. et al. Interleukin-33 alleviates diabetic cardiomyopathy through regulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy via insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3. J. Cell Physiol. 236, 4403–4419 (2021).
Ritchie, R. H. & Abel, E. D. Basic mechanisms of diabetic heart disease. Circ. Res. 126, 1501–1525 (2020).
Nakamura, M. et al. Glycogen synthase kinase-3alpha promotes fatty acid uptake and lipotoxic cardiomyopathy. Cell Metab. 29, 1119–1134 (2019).
Moulis, M. & Vindis, C. Methods for measuring autophagy in mice. Cells 6, 1–14 (2017).
Jung, S. H. et al. Diclofenac impairs autophagic flux via oxidative stress and lysosomal dysfunction: implications for hepatotoxicity. Redox. Biol. 37, 101751 (2020).
Kanamori, H. et al. Autophagic adaptations in diabetic cardiomyopathy differ between type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Autophagy 11, 1146–1160 (2015).
Yoshida, Y. et al. Ubiquitination of exposed glycoproteins by SCF(FBXO27) directs damaged lysosomes for autophagy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 8574–8579 (2017).
Mei, Z., Song, H., Tian, X. & Liu, D. Effects of Omega-3 fatty acids on chinese patients with cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiol. Discov. 2, 22–29 (2022).
Yu, W. et al. Sirt3 deficiency exacerbates diabetic cardiac dysfunction: role of Foxo3A-parkin-mediated mitophagy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 1863, 1973–1983 (2017).
Saha, S., Panigrahi, D. P., Patil, S. & Bhutia, S. K. Autophagy in health and disease: a comprehensive review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 104, 485–495 (2018).
Kim, K. H. & Lee, M. S. Autophagy–a key player in cellular and body metabolism. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 10, 322–337 (2014).
Yao, Q. et al. Curcumin protects against diabetic cardiomyopathy by promoting autophagy and alleviating apoptosis. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 124, 26–34 (2018).
Feng, Y. et al. LncRNA DCRF regulates cardiomyocyte autophagy by targeting miR-551b-5p in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Theranostics 9, 4558–4566 (2019).
D’Arcy, M. S. Cell death: a review of the major forms of apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Cell Biol. Int. 43, 582–592 (2019).
Delbridge, L. M., Mellor, K. M., Taylor, D. J. & Gottlieb, R. A. Myocardial autophagic energy stress responses–macroautophagy, mitophagy, and glycophagy. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 308, H1194–1204 (2015).
Alessandrini, F., Pezze, L. & Ciribilli, Y. LAMPs: shedding light on cancer biology. Semin. Oncol. 44, 239–253 (2017).
Chi, C. et al. LAMP-2B regulates human cardiomyocyte function by mediating autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 556–565 (2019).
Gu, S. et al. Downregulation of LAPTM4B contributes to the impairment of the autophagic flux via unopposed activation of mTORC1 signaling during myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Circ. Res. 127, e148–e165 (2020).
Li, A. et al. Mitochondrial autophagy: molecular mechanisms and implications for cardiovascular disease. Cell Death Dis. 13, 444 (2022).
Wallace, K. B., Sardao, V. A. & Oliveira, P. J. Mitochondrial determinants of doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy. Circ. Res. 126, 926–941 (2020).
Wang, S. H. et al. LncRNA H19 governs mitophagy and restores mitochondrial respiration in the heart through Pink1/Parkin signaling during obesity. Cell Death Dis. 12, 557 (2021).
Song, H. et al. CREG1 improves the capacity of the skeletal muscle response to exercise endurance via modulation of mitophagy. Autophagy 17, 4102–4118 (2021).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to all the participants of this work.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82070308, 82270300, 32071116, 82170297 and 81670276), the Excellent Youth Fund of Liaoning Natural Science Foundation (2021-YQ-03), The Liaoning Science and Technology Project (2022JH2/101300012, 2020JH1/10300002 and 2021JH2/10300128), and the Foundation Strengthening Plan Technical Field Fund Project (2021-JCJQ-JJ-1080).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.L. and R.N.X. contributed to the methodology, carried out the experiments and wrote the manuscript. Q.Y.Z., X.X.T., and H.X.S. performed the animal experiments. Y.X.L. and Y.P.Q. performed the biochemical and cellular experiments. H.B.Y., X.L.Z., and Q.M.J. analyzed the data. C.H.Y. and Y.L.H. designed the research and directed the study.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, D., Xing, R., Zhang, Q. et al. The CREG1-FBXO27-LAMP2 axis alleviates diabetic cardiomyopathy by promoting autophagy in cardiomyocytes. Exp Mol Med 55, 2025–2038 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-023-01081-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-023-01081-2
This article is cited by
-
Epigenetics in diabetic cardiomyopathy
Clinical Epigenetics (2024)