Senescent cells in cancer tissue, including senescent fibroblasts and macrophages, have been reported to increase the malignant potency of cancer cells by secreting senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Otherwise, Senescence of tumor cells has been believed to inhibit tumor growth by halting the massive proliferation and increasing the chances of immune clearance. In particular, senescent tumor cells (STCs) have been thought that they rarely exist in carcinomas because oncogene-induced senescence needs to be overcome for protumorigenic cells to become malignant. However, recent studies have revealed that a considerable number of STCs are present in cancer tissue, even in metastatic sites. In fact, STCs are widely involved in cancer progression by leading to collective invasion and building a cytokine barrier to protect nonsenescent tumor cells from immune attack. Furthermore, therapy-induced STCs can induce tumor progression and recurrence by increasing stemness. However, obscure causative factors and their heterogeneity in various cancers make it difficult to establish the physiological role of STCs. Here, we summarize and review the current knowledge of the pathophysiology and role of STCs. We also outline the current status of therapeutic strategies for directly removing STCs or modulating the SASPs to maximize the positive functions of STCs while suppressing the negative functions.
Cellular senescence is an irreversible cell cycle arrest caused by various internal or external stimuli1,2,3. The first reported type of cellular senescence was “replicative senescence” in the primary cell culture system4,5. The excess proliferating capacity of the cells and the shortening of their telomeres are significantly involved in replicative senescence6,7. In addition, triggering factors, including oncogene activation, DNA damage, or reactive oxygen species (ROS), can lead to early cellular senescence while maintaining replication capacity8,9. This type of cellular senescence is called “premature senescence”, and is observed in cancer cells1,8,9. Senescent cells feature overexpression of CDK inhibitors, such as p16INK4A, p21WAF1, and their master regulator p5310,11,12. Increased lysosomal senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-Gal) activity is another key marker of senescent cells13,14. Senescent cells generally undergo proinflammatory genomic reprogramming and release various types of cytokines and microvesicles, which is collectively called the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP)15,16.
Cancer cells are the most proliferative cells in human-derived tissue. Paradoxically, senescent cells are frequently observed in cancer tissue17,18,19,20,21. Although various types of senescent cells are found in the tumor microenvironment, the most common type is senescent tumor cells (STCs)22. Cancer cells have a harsh environment, which is hypoxic and poorly nourished due to their insatiable desire for nutrients and oxygen, and these features easily lead to cellular damage23,24. The high replication burden of cancer cells also raises the possibility of genomic instability, which might be the main driver of cellular senescence25. However, until now, the exact mechanisms behind why and how cancer cells turn into STCs have remained unknown.
The importance of STCs in cancer progression has long been overlooked because they have been considered a product of a defense mechanism against cancer rather than a progression of it26,27. Many recent studies, however, have provided new insight into the cancer-promoting properties of STCs, such as their significant ability to promote local invasion and epithelial−mesenchymal transition (EMT)17,28. As remnant STCs following chemotherapy or radiotherapy are associated with cancer cell dormancy, which leads to a high rate of cancer relapse, controlling STCs after cancer treatment is important29. In this review, we present an overview of our current understanding of STCs. First, we offer appropriate markers to analyze STCs in human cancer tissues in vivo. Second, we summarize various drivers and causes of cancer cell senescence in the tumor microenvironment. Third, we provide the latest evidence that STCs promote cancer progression in a variety of cancers. Finally, we analyze the usability of senolytic drugs in cancer therapy.
STCs in cancer tissues
Identifying the presence of senescent cells in human cancer tissue in vivo has challenges; however, the range of senescence markers has widened, making it easy to detect senescent cells8. Typically, the analysis of SA-β-Gal staining or p16INK4A immunostaining are the most conventional and reliable methods to identify senescent cells used both in vitro and in vivo8,13,30. The trimethylation of lysine 9 in histone 3 (H3K9 trimethylation) can also be used as a senescence marker20,31. However, it is risky to detect senescent cells using a single marker considering the sensitivity and specificity of these markers. The major limitation of SA-β-Gal staining is its false positivity14,30. SA-β-Gal-positive cells are reported in normal tissues, such as the sebaceous gland and hair follicle tissues14. Even thick mucus in the gastrointestinal tract shows positive SA-β-Gal staining32. In the case of p16INK4A immunohistochemistry (IHC), false positives occur in human papillomavirus infection or when the CDKN2A locus is mutated33,34. The requirement of nonfixed fresh frozen tissue for SA-β-gal staining because it is an enzymatic reaction is a major disadvantage preventing its use in large-scale studies of cellular senescence in human tissue. Alternatively, lipofuscin, which accumulates upon senescence induction and consists of lipid-containing residues of lysosomal digestion, can be detected by staining with Sudan Black B in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue35. Negative markers that should be absent in senescent cells can also be used. These markers are closely related to cell proliferation, such as Ki-67 or bromodeoxyuridine incorporation36. Instead of immunostaining, several methods have also been developed to identify senescence in ex vivo live tissues and organisms. For instance, the fluorescent senoprobes 5-dodecanoylaminofluorescein di-ß-D-galactopyranoside (C12FDG) and SPiDER-βGal have successfully been used to detect high β-galactosidase-expressing cells in live tissue by flow cytometry37,38. Nonetheless, these chromogenic fluorescent molecules and tracers have short wavelengths, resulting in the dispersion of fluorescence emission and leading to limited tissue penetrance39. To overcome this shortcoming, two-photon and near-infrared probes, including AHGa and NIR-BG, have been used to detect chemotherapy-induced senescence in vivo40. Furthermore, a positron emission tomography tracer called [18 F]FPyGal, the use of which indicated a close correlation between β-galactosidase activity and tracer uptake in chemotherapy-treated tumors in vivo, has also recently been developed41. Nevertheless, since various types of cells are mixed in tumor tissue, careful observation of histological slides is essential to identify the exact cell type.
Although specific physiological roles are still lacking, three kinds of senescent cells have been observed in cancer tissues: tumor epithelial cells, macrophages, and fibroblasts18. Our previous studies have found that an equivalent number of SA-β-Gal-positive epithelial origin STCs exist in thyroid, stomach, and colorectal cancer and glioblastoma17,18 (Fig. 1). Costaining with epithelial cell markers showed that senescent cells are cancer epithelial cells18. These data suggest that some tumor cells turn into STCs during cancer progression. Unfortunately, STCs are morphologically indistinguishable from non-STCs in terms of tissue histology; enlarged cell size, and the formation of heterochromatin foci in the nucleus, which are commonly observed in in vitro senescent cells8, are not observed in vivo. While STCs are not distinct from non-STCs in appearance, their gene expression patterns differ. The expression of SASP markers, a major characteristic of senescent cells, is observed in STCs both in vivo and in vitro1,16. Significantly, the expression of SASP markers is thought to affect other types of surrounding cells in a paracrine manner16,42. Therefore, detecting STCs using representative SASP markers with conventional markers is effective for revealing the pathophysiological role of STCs. Another interesting feature of STCs is their local distribution in primary cancer. SA-β-Gal staining and p16INK4A IHC analysis have revealed that STCs are often observed in the invasive region rather than in the center of cancer tissue17,18. STCs are thus thought to exist in the cancer invasive region to engage in cancer growth or inhibit immune cell infiltration. In addition, the representative senescent cell type in cancer tissue is macrophages. Round-shaped SA-β-Gal-positive cells, which are also CD68 positive, are often identified18. These cells commonly exist in intratumoral or peritumor regions18. CD68 and SA-β-Gal double-positive cells are also CD206 positive, which means they are M2-type macrophages18,43. Monocytes can be differentiated into M2 macrophages with several kinds of cytokine-induced signals43,44. The number of STCs and M2-type macrophages are proportional in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissue18. These data suggest that STCs are involved in M2-type macrophage differentiation. Finally, senescent cells observed in the tumor stroma and peritumoral region are vimentin-positive fibroblasts18,44,45,46,47. Our recent observations showed that senescent fibroblasts do not always exist in tumor tissues18. Furthermore, senescent fibroblasts did not show any correlation with STCs, but STCs showed a close correlation with senescent macrophages18. Senescent fibroblasts seem to be involved in the active proliferation of proneoplastic epithelial cells.
Drivers of cellular senescence in cancer cells
Oncogene-induced senescence (OIS) is a potent tumor-suppressive mechanism that halts cell proliferation following potentially cancer-causing genetic alterations in normal cells20,22. The first observation of OIS was in an in vitro study in which an oncogenic form of Ras, H-RasG12V, was ectopically expressed in the primary human lung fibroblast cell line IMR9048. Senescent growth arrest has also been stably established in in vivo animal models, with a notable example being a model featuring an ectopic expression of Ras in mammary epithelial cells49. Starting as studies of oncogenic Ras-induced senescence, OIS studies have gradually expanded to include the PI3K/AKT pathway, a signaling pathway that is related to approximately 40% of human cancers50,51. Mutant Ras-induced senescence is associated with the DNA damage response (DDR) caused by ROS, which leads to the recruitment and activation of the serine-threonine kinase ataxia-telangiectasia mutated52,53,54. On the other hand, cells undergoing AKT pathway-induced senescence do not display a DDR, DNA damage foci, or senescence-associated heterochromatin foci55. This type of senescence maintains low levels of p16INK4A and phosphorylated p5355. Hyperactivation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway triggers senescence by promoting enhanced p53 protein synthesis via mTORC156. Aberrant PI3K/AKT signaling also triggers the sequestration of MDM2 in the nucleolus in a PML/p19ARF-independent manner56,57. Despite the complexity of factors involved in OIS, it has been demonstrated that the tumor suppressors p53 and pRB are the two main regulators of OIS20. The loss of p53 or its regulator p19ARF in mice provokes Ras-induced cancer cell invasion58; conversely, the reactivation of p53 suppresses tumor growth in association with the expression of common senescence markers59. Since OIS needs to be overcome for carcinoma development, OIS is mostly found in precancerous adenomatous lesions60. For instance, senescent cells are observed in H-RasG12V transgenic mouse squamous papilloma61. BRAFV600E-induced senescent melanocytes were also identified in mouse and human nevi62. Another possible example is human papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) containing the BRAFV600E mutation, a crucial oncogene in the development of PTC63,64.
The most clinically common type of premature senescence is therapy-induced senescence (TIS). It is well established that STCs are easily triggered by chemotherapy2,65. The prosenescence activity of chemotherapeutics has been reported in various cancers, including breast, lung, prostate, and colorectal cancers2,65. In a previous study, approximately 40% of breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy had SA-β-Gal- and p16INK4A-positive cancer cells66. In addition, non-small-cell lung cancer patients who received carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy were found to often have STCs in their cancer tissue67. The major factor causing TIS by chemotherapy is extensive nuclear damage, such as DNA breaks and modification, induced by effects such as alkylation by genotoxic agents and ROS generation65. However, the induction of senescence by chemotherapy seems to be caused by a telomere-independent mechanism, as breast cancer cells exposed to doxorubicin did not show telomere shortening even though the accumulation of some cytogenetic changes within telomeres was found68. Ionizing radiation (IR) is another common therapeutic method that induces cellular senescence in various cancer cells65. A senescent phenotype induced by IR has been frequently observed in various cancer cell lines of in vitro culture systems and in in vivo mouse xenograft tumors65. Senescence caused by IR seems to be p53-dependent69; MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells with attenuated p53 function fail to become senescent, ultimately leading to apoptosis. In glioma cells, PTEN deficiency results in senescence in damaged cancer cells, whereas sufficient PTEN expression leads the cells toward apoptosis69.
ROS is another important, well-known senescence inducer in vitro. Since OIS induces ROS generation through downstream signaling cascades, using H2O2 treatment to induce senescence in vitro is a well-established method53. In contrast, the role of ROS as senescence inducers in vivo has not been demonstrated. This is due to the short half-life of ROS and difficulties in measuring ROS in surgically removed cancer tissues70. The relative amount of ROS is indirectly quantified according to the expression of hypoxia-related or antioxidant proteins such as HIF-1α71. Although the exact mechanism is still disputed, it is suggested that STCs in the invasive region are closely related to ROS generation. The invasive region of cancer tissue is where cancer cells most massively proliferate. If angiogenesis does not follow, cancer cells are easily exposed to hypoxic insults72. Following abrupt revascularization with the angiogenetic activity of cancer cells may lead to the generation of a large amount of ROS18,73. In a study of CRC patients, p16INK4A expression was inversely correlated with HIF-1α expression, which suggests that ROS generation following revascularization in the invasive front resulted in the generation of STCs18. In line with this, multiple studies have reported that HIF-1α-positive cancer cells are located in the invasive front of cancer tissue and are closely related to metastasis74,75. However, the evidence of a connection between tumor cell senescence and the hypoxic response is still weak; therefore, further studies on whether ROS can be the main inducer of tumor cell senescence should be performed.
SASP expression in STCs
In addition to the presence of cell cycle arrest during the senescence process, senescent cells secrete a complex mixture of proteins collectively known as SASPs, a key non-cell-autonomous feature of senescence that distinguishes it from quiescence1,3,22. SASPs comprise a complex secretome of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, extracellular matrix proteins, growth factors, and matrix metalloproteinases, as well as exosome-like small extracellular vesicles3,22,27. NF-κB and C/EBP-β complexes, both of which are transcriptional machineries associated with inflammatory responses, are currently recognized as the main transcription factors globally regulating SASP expression76. Recent studies suggest that other pathways, including the GATA4, mTOR, and JAK2/STAT3 pathways, also play an important role in SASPs expression77. Although SASP expression differs between STCs, to our knowledge, the most vigorously expressed protumorigenic SASPs from STCs are (1) immune cell-modulating cytokines, (2) proangiogenic factors, and (3) extracellular matrix-modulating factors. In CRC cell lines, immune cell-modulating cytokines, including TNF-α, TGF-β, and various interleukin family molecules and chemokines, are significantly upregulated in H2O2-induced senescent cells18. Specifically, our previous study demonstrated that C-X-C motif chemokine 12 (CXCL12) is a key modulator of the antitumor function of cytotoxic T lymphocytes18. Another potent key immune-modulating SASP, IL-6, recruits myeloid-derived suppressor cells to cancer tissue78,79. Additionally, IL-6 is closely related to cancer-promoting cellular reprogramming and EMT80. Although additional research is needed, various proangiogenic factors, including members of the vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and angiopoietin-like protein (ANGPTL) families, are also significantly upregulated in STCs in vitro, which suggests that STCs are closely related to the overall angiogenesis of cancer tissue. Furthermore, a variety of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), including MMP1 and MMP9, are upregulated in STCs17. SASPs from STCs therefore enormously impact the tumor microenvironment by modulating the immune system, oxygen supply system, and cancer embedding matrix. However, it is well recognized that the role of SASPs is cell type-dependent16; the same SASP can have either protumorigenic or antitumorigenic functions depending on the cell type. For instance, IL-6, a well-known protumorigenic SASP in various types of cancer, sometimes acts as an antitumorigenic SASP recruiting antitumor immune cells to the tumor tissue81,82. Therefore, it is important to selectively inhibit cancer-promoting SASPs while retaining the antitumor features of SASPs; for example, inactivation of STAT3 reduces protumorigenic SASP without affecting the expression of antitumorigenic chemoattractants in a PTEN-null prostate cancer model83.
Cancer-promoting features of STCs
Considering the potential proinflammatory role of SASPs, senescent cells are widely involved in various aspects of tumor progression17,18,29. Since STCs were previously understood to result from defense mechanisms against cancer progression3,20,48, other noncancer cell types were the focus of studies initially. Fibroblasts are the most broadly studied cancer-promoting senescent cells in the tumor microenvironment45,46,47. Krtolica et al. first reported that senescent fibroblasts induced the active proliferation of proneoplastic epithelial cells in prostate cancer45. Another study also showed that the coinjection of breast cancer cells with senescent fibroblasts led to faster growth of cancer masses in an in vivo mouse xenograft model84. Researchers have only recently considered the role of STCs in cancer progression. The first identified cancer-promoting STCs were senescent malignant pleural mesothelioma cells, which were found to increase EMT and chemoresistance in vitro28. Pemetrexed-treated senescent mesothelioma cells can induce the expression of EMT-related SASPs, including MMP9 and SNAIL28. Moreover, the overexpression of oncogenic H-RasG12V in normal mesothelial cells resulted in OIS and a similar expression pattern of SASPs and increased EMT28.
The first major pathophysiological role of STCs in cancer progression was identified in PTC17. IHC analysis revealed that STCs exist in the invasive front of human PTC in a collective manner with a conserved expression of E-cadherin17. An in vitro invasion assay also demonstrated that primary STCs had greater invasion ability than non-STCs17. Subsequent in vitro leader cell assay, RNA sequencing, and cell migration assay showed that the leading group, SA-β-Gal-positive STCs, releases CXCL12, which in turn attracts other CXCR4-positive non-STCs to invasion sites17. STCs were detected in the lymphovascular channels of cancer tissue and survived by increased anoikis resistance in a CXCL12-dependent manner17. The presence of STCs in both lymphovascular channels and lymph node metastases in PTC patients suggests that STCs have high metastatic ability17.
Another notable feature of STCs is their close relationship with cancer stemness29. Cancer stem cells are part of a small population of tumor cells that have self-renewal capacity and differentiate into heterogeneous cell types, and cancer stem cells are significantly involved in cancer recurrence85. Karabicici et al. indicated that TIS of cancer cells increases the mRNA expression of stem cell-related molecules, such as CD34 and CD13386. Another study showed increased expression of stemness markers in senescent B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells and other human solid tumor cell lines29. A p53−estrogen fusion protein experiment found that cancer cells that had experienced cellular senescence had a higher colony formation ability in vitro29. The induction of canonical Wnt signaling after chemotherapy is also critical for activating the tumor-initiation ability of STCs29.
Recently, we found a very important role of STCs in CRC progression. We observed that STCs also have an enormous impact on the immune system in the tumor microenvironment18. Cytotoxic T cells are cancer-killing cells that express death signals, leading to the apoptosis of cancer cells18. The importance of cytotoxic T cells in CRC is reflected in the utility of the “Immunoscore”87. This score represents the number of infiltrating cytotoxic T cells in tumor tissue and is regarded as a major prognosis-determining factor in CRC patients87. An IHC analysis of CRC patients revealed that the number of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ cytotoxic T cells was decreased in p16INK4A-positive CRC patients18. A subsequent in vitro study showed that excess CXCL12, a SASP secreted from STCs, induces the internalization of its receptor CXCR4 in the plasma membrane of cytotoxic T cells18. Consequently, cytotoxic T cells lose their localization and cluster around the periphery of the tumor tissue, thus failing to infiltrate the cancer epithelium18. The authors also demonstrated that cells positive for CD206, a marker of M2 macrophages, are more likely to infiltrate the cancer epithelium in p16INK4A-positive CRC patients18. In a subsequent in vitro study, treatment with conditioned media from senescent CRC cells of primary monocytes induced M2 macrophage differentiation, and the effect was confirmed by a coculture system18. Furthermore, CSF1 secreted from STCs promoted monocyte differentiation into M2 macrophages, which disrupted cytotoxic T cell activation18.
In summary, three major cancer-promoting features of STCs are currently known: (1) increased EMT and increased stemness of the STCs themselves, (2) increased release of cancer-promoting factors affecting the invasiveness of nonsenescent cancer cells, and (3) modulation of the local microenvironment, including the immune system, to make it favorable for cancer progression (Fig. 2). Although the amount of evidence for the cancer-promoting qualities of STCs has recently increased17,18,29,85, the overall effect of STCs on cancer progression is still not fully understood. STCs are thought to be a group of heterogeneous cells that vary according to the time course of the disease and the underlying induction mechanisms. In other words, their role and effect can be diverse depending on the cancer type and the course of the disease. Therefore, thorough further research considering cancer type and cancer stage is necessary for a full understanding of the physiological role of STCs in cancer.
Based on reports to date, the elimination of senescent cells or STCs from cancer tissues or targeting of SASPs secreted from senescent cells is expected to improve patient prognosis and enhance anticancer treatment88. Efforts to selectively eliminate senescent cells for functional rejuvenation have been made by researchers studying aging89. The outcome of this vigorous research are agents known as senolytics, which improve aging-related phenotypes and extend patient lifespan by killing senescent cells88,89. Various previous trials using senolytics to selectively kill STCs have been conducted. First, dasatinib and quercetin were used to eliminate olaparib-induced senescent ovarian cancer cells90. Unfortunately, these senolytcis did not induce the apoptosis of STCs in ovarian cancer cells, and the combination therapy showed low efficacy in removing doxorubicin-induced senescent liver cancer cells90,91. Another type of senolytic, ABT263, an inhibitor of the Bcl-2 family, showed a senolytic effect on some types of therapy-induced STCs, including lymphoma cells92. However, ABT263 did not show any senolytic activity in prostate or breast STCs93,94. Therefore, the effect of senolytics on STCs is cancer-type dependent. Moreover, ABT263 often causes thrombocytopenia, which is the main drawback of clinical application95. It is expected that this shortcoming can be overcome by using a modified form of ABT263, a Bcl-xL-directed proteolysis-targeting chimera, which is less toxic to platelets96. Similarly, drugs that have senolytic effects on senescent fibroblasts have shown limited effects on STCs or have not been sufficiently studied. For example, piperlongumine, a natural extract that affects radiation-induced senescent fibroblasts, showed a senolytic effect on olaparib-induced senescent ovarian tumor cells88. Panobinostat, an FDA-approved histone deacetylase inhibitor, demonstrated senolytic activity in cisplatin- or paclitaxel-induced senescent lung cancer cells97. Fisetin failed to show a senolytic effect on olaparib-induced senescent ovarian tumor cells and was also largely ineffective against senescent lung, head and neck, and prostate cancer cells88,90. The senolytic effect of the D-retro-inverso isoform of Foxo4 (Foxo4-DRI) and Hsp90 inhibitors, which showed senolytic effects on fibroblasts, on STCs remains to be proven98. As advanced drug screening techniques are being developed, conventional drugs used in other fields that are potential senolytics have been discovered. Two independent groups discovered that cardiac glycosides, ouabain, and digoxin are broad-spectrum senolytics by chemical library screening99,100. Ouabain had senolytic activity in several drug-induced senescent cancer cells98. However, it is noteworthy that supraphysiological concentrations of these agents were used in vitro, which could result in toxicity that is intolerable to patients101. The inhibition of glucose metabolism, fatty acid oxidation, and oxidative phosphorylation exerts a senolytic effect in therapy-induced senescent lymphomas102. Via unbiased high-throughput screening with oncogene-induced fibroblasts, the senolytic effect of bromodomain and extra terminal domain family protein inhibitors was shown, and the effect that was mediated through the attenuation of nonhomologous end-joining repair and the activation of the autophagic pathway102. A recently developed small-molecule BET degrader, ARV825, showed effective senolysis in doxorubicin-induced senescent CRC cells103. Drugs disrupting the immune surveillance system also have the potential for eliminating STCs. For example, oxidized forms of membrane-bound vimentin, dipeptidyl peptidase 4, and CD44 were discovered to be senescence-specific surface antigens of senescent mouse lung fibroblasts, human diploid fibroblasts, and endothelial cells, respectively104,105,106. If senescent cancer cell-specific surface antigens are identified, they can be used to deliver cytotoxic drugs or cytotoxic immune cells to senescent cancer cells. In addition, modulating the immunosuppressive SASP of senescent stromal or cancer cells can augment the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors or other antitumor immunotherapies.
Another type of drug, senomorphics, is being developed to suppress aging by targeting SASPs. Since SASPs are so diverse, targeting their master regulators, such as NF-κB and STAT3, has been considered. However, the transcription factors related to SASP expression are critical for cell survival76. Therefore, targeting them can induce critical adverse effects within cells. In addition, since these transcription factors regulate several types of SASPs in a nonspecific manner, some antitumorigenic aspects of SASPs, such as immune clearance of cancer cells via augmentation of immune cell recruitment, can be reduced107. Moreover, the major protumorigenic SASPs can be different in various cancers; the same SASP can be either a protumorigenic or antitumorigenic SASP depending on the cancer type108. In other words, it might be more effective to inhibit the major tumorigenic SASPs directly108. For example, IL-1α/β and IL-1R are known as major signaling axes producing protumorigenic SASPs in oncogene-induced senescent fibroblasts108. Without affecting the presence of STCs, IL-1α deletion in K-RasG12D-driven pancreatic cancers in mice has been found to reduce tumor formation and protumorigenic SASP production109. Therefore, several therapeutic drugs targeting the IL-1 receptor (anakinra), IL-6 receptor (tocilizumab and siltuximab), IL-6 (sirukumab), and TNF-α (adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab) have been developed and are currently available in clinical applications for autoinflammatory diseases110,111,112,113,114. In line with this, we have shown in a previous study that CXCL12- and CSF1-neutralizing antibodies significantly reduce CRC progression by increasing cytotoxic T cell infiltration in mice with AOM/DSS-induced CRC and increase the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as PD-1 inhibitors18. These drugs could be candidates for selective drug repositioning to inhibit protumorigenic SASPs (Fig. 3).
Although the cancer-promoting features of STCs are continuously being discovered, the overall effect of STCs in cancer tissue on patient prognosis is still disputed. The most challenging limitation to revealing the effect of STCs in the absence of a large cohort study regarding the presence of STCs in cancer. The key reasons making such a study difficult are as follows: (1) the absence of a single specific marker for STC detection and (2) the necessity of several biopsy samples. Since STCs are not evenly distributed in the cancer epithelium, using a single biopsy sample to detect STCs is risky. After a large cohort study with exact patient classification is undertaken, it is expected that a more precise analysis of STCs can be performed. Another barrier for the STC study is the absence of an appropriate in vivo model. Tumor mouse models for identifying STCs in human tumors have not been sufficiently validated. Therefore, most of the research comparing the physiological roles of STCs and non-STCs has been conducted in vitro and is thus limited. Some researchers have used an in vivo on−off switch system to compare STCs and non-STCs, but the methodological variance is still lacking. It will be interesting to construct cell-type-specific p16INK4A-ATTAC and p16INK4A-3MR mice to determine the role of STCs in various mouse cancer models and to discover important protumorigenic SASPs in each cancer type115.
Although additional studies should be performed with various cancer tissues, previous studies have shown that STCs are more closely related to cancer progression than to cancer inhibition17,18,28,29,84. Moreover, these cancer-promoting features are caused by SASP secretion from STCs17,18. Considering the adverse effect of current senolytics on normal cells and patients, a new generation of senolytics should be developed for cancer therapy95. Presently, targeting STC-derived SASPs, including IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, CSF1, and CXCL12, is the most appropriate therapeutic strategy to control STCs.
Campisi, J. Aging, cellular senescence, and cancer. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 75, 685–705 (2013).
Park, J. H. et al. Disruption of nucleocytoplasmic trafficking as a cellular senescence driver. Exp. Mol. Med. 53, 1092–1108 (2021).
Collado, M., Blasco, M. A. & Serrano, M. Cellular senescence in cancer and aging. Cell 130, 223–233 (2007).
Hayflick, L. & Moorhead, P. S. The serial cultivation of human diploid cell strains. Exp. Cell Res. 25, 585–621 (1961).
Goldstein, S. Replicative senescence: the human fibroblast comes of age. Science 249, 1129–1133 (1990).
Lundblad, V. & Szostak, J. W. A mutant with a defect in telomere elongation leads to senescence in yeast. Cell 57, 633–643 (1989).
Shay, J. W. & Wright, W. E. Senescence and immortalization: role of telomeres and telomerase. Carcinogenesis 26, 867–874 (2005).
Hernandez-Segura, A., Nehme, J. & Demaria, M. Hallmarks of cellular Ssenescence. Trends Cell Biol. 28, 436–453 (2018).
Munoz-Espin, D. & Serrano, M. Cellular senescence: from physiology to pathology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 482–496 (2014).
Rayess, H., Wang, M. B. & Srivatsan, E. S. Cellular senescence and tumor suppressor gene p16. Int. J. Cancer 130, 1715–1725 (2012).
Stein, G. H., Drullinger, L. F., Soulard, A. & Dulic, V. Differential roles for cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21 and p16 in the mechanisms of senescence and differentiation in human fibroblasts. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 2109–2117 (1999).
Kim, Y. Y. et al. Cooperation between p21 and Akt is required for p53-dependent cellular senescence. Aging Cell 16, 1094–1103 (2017).
Lee, B. Y. et al. Senescence-associated beta-galactosidase is lysosomal beta-galactosidase. Aging Cell 5, 187–195 (2006).
Dimri, G. P. et al. A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 9363–9367 (1995).
Chien, Y. et al. Control of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype by NF-kappaB promotes senescence and enhances chemosensitivity. Genes Dev. 25, 2125–2136 (2011).
Coppe, J. P., Desprez, P. Y., Krtolica, A. & Campisi, J. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 5, 99–118 (2010).
Kim, Y. H. et al. Senescent tumor cells lead the collective invasion in thyroid cancer. Nat. Commun. 8, 15208 (2017).
Choi, Y. W. et al. Senescent tumor cells build a cytokine shield in colorectal cancer. Adv. Sci. 8, 2002497 (2021).
Lehmann, B. D. et al. Senescence-associated exosome release from human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 68, 7864–7871 (2008).
Braig, M. et al. Oncogene-induced senescence as an initial barrier in lymphoma development. Nature 436, 660–665 (2005).
Park, S. C. Survive or thrive: tradeoff strategy for cellular senescence. Exp. Mol. Med. 49, e342 (2017).
Kim, Y. H. & Park, T. J. Cellular senescence in cancer. BMB Rep. 52, 42–46 (2019).
Akakura, N. et al. Constitutive expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha renders pancreatic cancer cells resistant to apoptosis induced by hypoxia and nutrient deprivation. Cancer Res. 61, 6548–6554 (2001).
Brahimi-Horn, M. C., Chiche, J. & Pouyssegur, J. Hypoxia and cancer. J. Mol. Med. 85, 1301–1307 (2007).
Macheret, M. & Halazonetis, T. D. DNA replication stress as a hallmark of cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 10, 425–448 (2015).
Campisi, J. Senescent cells, tumor suppression, and organismal aging: good citizens, bad neighbors. Cell 120, 513–522 (2005).
Lee, S. & Lee, J. S. Cellular senescence: a promising strategy for cancer therapy. BMB Rep. 52, 35–41 (2019).
Canino, C. et al. SASP mediates chemoresistance and tumor-initiating-activity of mesothelioma cells. Oncogene 31, 3148–3163 (2012).
Milanovic, M. et al. Senescence-associated reprogramming promotes cancer stemness. Nature 553, 96–100 (2018).
Debacq-Chainiaux, F., Erusalimsky, J. D., Campisi, J. & Toussaint, O. Protocols to detect senescence-associated beta-galactosidase (SA-betagal) activity, a biomarker of senescent cells in culture and in vivo. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1798–1806 (2009).
Ryan, J. M. & Cristofalo, V. J. Histone acetylation during aging of human cells in culture. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 48, 735–742 (1972).
Going, J. J., Stuart, R. C., Downie, M., Fletcher-Monaghan, A. J. & Keith, W. N. ‘Senescence-associated’ beta-galactosidase activity in the upper gastrointestinal tract. J. Pathol. 196, 394–400 (2002).
Gronhoj Larsen, C. et al. Correlation between human papillomavirus and p16 overexpression in oropharyngeal tumours: a systematic review. Br. J. Cancer 110, 1587–1594 (2014).
Larque, A. B. et al. P16(INK(4)a) overexpression is associated with CDKN2A mutation and worse prognosis in HPV-negative laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas. Virchows Arch. 466, 375–382 (2015).
Georgakopoulou, E. A. et al. Specific lipofuscin staining as a novel biomarker to detect replicative and stress-induced senescence. A method applicable in cryo-preserved and archival tissues. Aging 5, 37–50 (2013).
Kee, N., Sivalingam, S., Boonstra, R. & Wojtowicz, J. M. The utility of Ki-67 and BrdU as proliferative markers of adult neurogenesis. J. Neurosci. Methods 115, 97–105 (2002).
Nakamura, Y. et al. A topically-sprayable, activatable fluorescent and retaining probe, SPiDER-betaGal for detecting cancer: advantages of anchoring to cellular proteins after activation. Oncotarget 8, 39512–39521 (2017).
Adewoye, A. B., Tampakis, D., Follenzi, A. & Stolzing, A. Multiparameter flow cytometric detection and quantification of senescent cells in vitro. Biogerontology 21, 773–786 (2020).
Herrmann, J. et al. A novel protocol for detection of senescence and calcification markers by fluorescence microscopy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 3475 (2020).
Lozano-Torres, B. et al. An OFF-ON two-photon fluorescent probe for tracking cell senescence in vivo. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 8808–8811 (2017).
Iafrate, M. & Fruhwirth, G. O. How non-invasive in vivo cell tracking supports the development and translation of cancer immunotherapies. Front. Physiol. 11, 154 (2020).
Herranz, N. & Gil, J. Mechanisms and functions of cellular senescence. J. Clin. Invest 128, 1238–1246 (2018).
Roszer, T. Understanding the mysterious M2 macrophage through activation markers and effector mechanisms. Mediators Inflamm. 2015, 816460 (2015).
Bouhlel, M. A. et al. PPARgamma activation primes human monocytes into alternative M2 macrophages with anti-inflammatory properties. Cell Metab. 6, 137–143 (2007).
Krtolica, A., Parrinello, S., Lockett, S., Desprez, P. Y. & Campisi, J. Senescent fibroblasts promote epithelial cell growth and tumorigenesis: a link between cancer and aging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12072–12077 (2001).
Parrinello, S., Coppe, J. P., Krtolica, A. & Campisi, J. Stromal-epithelial interactions in aging and cancer: senescent fibroblasts alter epithelial cell differentiation. J. Cell Sci. 118, 485–496 (2005).
Lawrenson, K. et al. Senescent fibroblasts promote neoplastic transformation of partially transformed ovarian epithelial cells in a three-dimensional model of early stage ovarian cancer. Neoplasia 12, 317–325 (2010).
Serrano, M., Lin, A. W., McCurrach, M. E., Beach, D. & Lowe, S. W. Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a. Cell 88, 593–602 (1997).
Sarkisian, C. J. et al. Dose-dependent oncogene-induced senescence in vivo and its evasion during mammary tumorigenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 493–505 (2007).
Prior, I. A., Lewis, P. D. & Mattos, C. A comprehensive survey of Ras mutations in cancer. Cancer Res. 72, 2457–2467 (2012).
Millis, S. Z., Ikeda, S., Reddy, S., Gatalica, Z. & Kurzrock, R. Landscape of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase pathway alterations across 19784 diverse solid tumors. JAMA Oncol. 2, 1565–1573 (2016).
Park, M. T. et al. Novel signaling axis for ROS generation during K-Ras-induced cellular transformation. Cell Death Differ. 21, 1185–1197 (2014).
Hlavata, L., Aguilaniu, H., Pichova, A. & Nystrom, T. The oncogenic RAS2(val19) mutation locks respiration, independently of PKA, in a mode prone to generate ROS. EMBO J. 22, 3337–3345 (2003).
Aird, K. M. et al. ATM couples replication stress and metabolic reprogramming during cellular senescence. Cell Rep. 11, 893–901 (2015).
Chan, K. T. et al. A functional genetic screen defines the AKT-induced senescence signaling network. Cell Death Differ. 27, 725–741 (2020).
Abraham, A. G. & O’Neill, E. PI3K/Akt-mediated regulation of p53 in cancer. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 42, 798–803 (2014).
Gottlieb, T. M., Leal, J. F., Seger, R., Taya, Y. & Oren, M. Cross-talk between Akt, p53 and Mdm2: possible implications for the regulation of apoptosis. Oncogene 21, 1299–1303 (2002).
Kamijo, T. et al. Tumor suppression at the mouse INK4a locus mediated by the alternative reading frame product p19ARF. Cell 91, 649–659 (1997).
Selivanova, G. & Wiman, K. G. Reactivation of mutant p53: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Oncogene 26, 2243–2254 (2007).
Collado, M. et al. Tumour biology: senescence in premalignant tumours. Nature 436, 642 (2005).
Chen, X. et al. Endogenous expression of Hras(G12V) induces developmental defects and neoplasms with copy number imbalances of the oncogene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7979–7984 (2009).
Kumar, R., Angelini, S., Snellman, E. & Hemminki, K. BRAF mutations are common somatic events in melanocytic nevi. J. Invest. Dermatol. 122, 342–348 (2004).
Frasca, F. et al. BRAF(V600E) mutation and the biology of papillary thyroid cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 15, 191–205 (2008).
Kim, Y. H. et al. TSH signaling overcomes B-RafV600E-induced senescence in papillary thyroid carcinogenesis through regulation of DUSP6. Neoplasia 16, 1107–1120 (2014).
Ewald, J. A., Desotelle, J. A., Wilding, G. & Jarrard, D. F. Therapy-induced senescence in cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 102, 1536–1546 (2010).
te Poele, R. H., Okorokov, A. L., Jardine, L., Cummings, J. & Joel, S. P. DNA damage is able to induce senescence in tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res. 62, 1876–1883 (2002).
Chen, J. Y. et al. Additive effects of C(2)-ceramide on paclitaxel-induced premature senescence of human lung cancer cells. Life Sci. 87, 350–357 (2010).
Elmore, L. W. et al. Adriamycin-induced senescence in breast tumor cells involves functional p53 and telomere dysfunction. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 35509–35515 (2002).
Jones, K. R. et al. p53-Dependent accelerated senescence induced by ionizing radiation in breast tumour cells. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 81, 445–458 (2005).
Duanghathaipornsuk, S., Farrell, E. J., Alba-Rubio, A. C., Zelenay, P. & Kim, D. S. Detection technologies for reactive oxygen species: fluorescence and electrochemical methods and their applications. Biosens. 11, 30 (2021).
Movafagh, S., Crook, S. & Vo, K. Regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1a by reactive oxygen species: new developments in an old debate. J. Cell. Biochem. 116, 696–703 (2015).
Muz, B., de la Puente, P., Azab, F. & Azab, A. K. The role of hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. Hypoxia 3, 83–92 (2015).
Sgarbi, G., Gorini, G., Liuzzi, F., Solaini, G. & Baracca, A. Hypoxia and IF(1) expression promote ROS decrease in cancer cells. Cells 7, 64 (2018).
Xing, F. et al. Hypoxia-induced Jagged2 promotes breast cancer metastasis and self-renewal of cancer stem-like cells. Oncogene 30, 4075–4086 (2011).
Liu, Z. J., Semenza, G. L. & Zhang, H. F. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and breast cancer metastasis. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 16, 32–43 (2015).
Salotti, J. & Johnson, P. F. Regulation of senescence and the SASP by the transcription factor C/EBPbeta. Exp. Gerontol. 128, 110752 (2019).
Kumari, R. & Jat, P. Mechanisms of cellular senescence: cell cycle arrest and senescence associated secretory phenotype. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 645593 (2021).
Toso, A. et al. Enhancing chemotherapy efficacy in Pten-deficient prostate tumors by activating the senescence-associated antitumor immunity. Cell Rep. 9, 75–89 (2014).
Ruhland, M. K. et al. Stromal senescence establishes an immunosuppressive microenvironment that drives tumorigenesis. Nat. Commun. 7, 11762 (2016).
Tamm, I., Kikuchi, T., Cardinale, I. & Krueger, J. G. Cell-adhesion-disrupting action of interleukin 6 in human ductal breast carcinoma cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 3329–3333 (1994).
Romano, M. et al. Role of IL-6 and its soluble receptor in induction of chemokines and leukocyte recruitment. Immunity 6, 315–325 (1997).
Faget, D. V., Ren, Q. & Stewart, S. A. Unmasking senescence: context-dependent effects of SASP in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 19, 439–453 (2019).
Pencik, J. et al. STAT3 regulated ARF expression suppresses prostate cancer metastasis. Nat. Commun. 6, 7736 (2015).
Liu, D. & Hornsby, P. J. Senescent human fibroblasts increase the early growth of xenograft tumors via matrix metalloproteinase secretion. Cancer Res. 67, 3117–3126 (2007).
Batlle, E. & Clevers, H. Cancer stem cells revisited. Nat. Med. 23, 1124–1134 (2017).
Karabicici, M., Alptekin, S., Firtina Karagonlar, Z. & Erdal, E. Doxorubicin-induced senescence promotes stemness and tumorigenicity in EpCAM-/CD133- nonstem cell population in hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, HuH-7. Mol. Oncol. 15, 2185–2202 (2021).
Angell, H. K., Bruni, D., Barrett, J. C., Herbst, R. & Galon, J. The immunoscore: colon cancer and beyond. Clin. Cancer Res. 26, 332–339 (2020).
Carpenter, V. J., Saleh, T. & Gewirtz, D. A. Senolytics for cancer therapy: is all that glitters really gold? Cancers 13, 723 (2021).
Yalcin, G. & Lee, C. K. The discovery of druggable anti-aging agents. Ann. Geriatr. Med. Res. 24, 232–242 (2020).
Fleury, H. et al. Exploiting interconnected synthetic lethal interactions between PARP inhibition and cancer cell reversible senescence. Nat. Commun. 10, 2556 (2019).
Kovacovicova, K. et al. Senolytic cocktail dasatinib+quercetin (D+Q) does not enhance the efficacy of senescence-inducing chemotherapy in liver cancer. Front. Oncol. 8, 459 (2018).
Ackler, S. et al. ABT-263 and rapamycin act cooperatively to kill lymphoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cancer Ther. 7, 3265–3274 (2008).
Malaquin, N. et al. DNA damage- But not enzalutamide-induced senescence in prostate cancer promotes senolytic Bcl-xL inhibitor sensitivity. Cells 9, 1593 (2020).
Saleh, T. et al. Clearance of therapy-induced senescent tumor cells by the senolytic ABT-263 via interference with BCL-XL -BAX interaction. Mol. Oncol. 14, 2504–2519 (2020).
Wilson, W. H. et al. Navitoclax, a targeted high-affinity inhibitor of BCL-2, in lymphoid malignancies: a phase 1 dose-escalation study of safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumour activity. Lancet Oncol. 11, 1149–1159 (2010).
Khan, S. et al. A selective BCL-XL PROTAC degrader achieves safe and potent antitumor activity. Nat. Med. 25, 1938–1947 (2019).
Samaraweera, L., Adomako, A., Rodriguez-Gabin, A. & McDaid, H. M. A novel indication for panobinostat as a senolytic drug in NSCLC and HNSCC. Sci. Rep. 7, 1900 (2017).
Baar, M. P. et al. Targeted apoptosis of senescent cells restores tissue homeostasis in response to chemotoxicity and aging. Cell 169, 132–147 e116 (2017).
Triana-Martinez, F. et al. Identification and characterization of cardiac glycosides as senolytic compounds. Nat. Commun. 10, 4731 (2019).
Guerrero, A. et al. Cardiac glycosides are broad-spectrum senolytics. Nat. Metab. 1, 1074–1088 (2019).
Demirci, D., Dayanc, B., Mazi, F. A. & Senturk, S. The Jekyll and Hyde of cellular senescence in. Cancer Cells 10, 208 (2021).
Dorr, J. R. et al. Synthetic lethal metabolic targeting of cellular senescence in cancer therapy. Nature 501, 421–425 (2013).
Wakita, M. et al. A BET family protein degrader provokes senolysis by targeting NHEJ and autophagy in senescent cells. Nat. Commun. 11, 1935 (2020).
Frescas, D. et al. Senescent cells expose and secrete an oxidized form of membrane-bound vimentin as revealed by a natural polyreactive antibody. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E1668–E1677 (2017).
Kim, K. M. et al. Identification of senescent cell surface targetable protein DPP4. Genes Dev. 31, 1529–1534 (2017).
Mun, G. I. & Boo, Y. C. Identification of CD44 as a senescence-induced cell adhesion gene responsible for the enhanced monocyte recruitment to senescent endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 298, H2102–H2111 (2010).
Xue, W. et al. Senescence and tumour clearance is triggered by p53 restoration in murine liver carcinomas. Nature 445, 656–660 (2007).
Lau, L. & David, G. Pro- and anti-tumorigenic functions of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 23, 1041–1051 (2019).
Lau, L., Porciuncula, A., Yu, A., Iwakura, Y. & David, G. Uncoupling the senescence-associated secretory phenotype from cell cycle exit via interleukin-1 inactivation unveils its protumorigenic role. Mol. Cell. Biol. 39, e00586–18 (2019).
Nuki, G., Bresnihan, B., Bear, M. B. & McCabe, D. & European Group Of Clinical, I. Long-term safety and maintenance of clinical improvement following treatment with anakinra (recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: extension phase of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 46, 2838–2846 (2002).
Hashimoto, J. et al. Humanized anti-interleukin-6-receptor antibody (tocilizumab) monotherapy is more effective in slowing radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis at high baseline risk for structural damage evaluated with levels of biomarkers, radiography, and BMI: data from the SAMURAI study. Mod. Rheumatol. 21, 10–15 (2011).
Taylor, P. C. et al. Efficacy and safety of monotherapy with sirukumab compared with adalimumab monotherapy in biologic-naive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (SIRROUND-H): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multinational, 52-week, phase 3 study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 77, 658–666 (2018).
Prattichizzo, F. et al. Anti-TNF-alpha treatment modulates SASP and SASP-related microRNAs in endothelial cells and in circulating angiogenic cells. Oncotarget 7, 11945–11958 (2016).
McLeod, C. et al. Adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol. Assess. 11, 1–158 (2007).
Baker, D. J. et al. Naturally occurring p16(Ink4a)-positive cells shorten healthy lifespan. Nature 530, 184–189 (2016).
This study was supported by grants from the National Research Foundation of Korea to Tae Jun Park at Ajou University (NRF-2019R1A2C2086127, NRF-2020R1A6A1A03043539, and NRF-2020M3A9D8037604) and to Yong Won Choi at Ajou University (NRF-2018M3A9E8023857 and 2021R1C1C1012266).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, S.S., Choi, Y.W., Kim, JH. et al. Senescent tumor cells: an overlooked adversary in the battle against cancer. Exp Mol Med 53, 1834–1841 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-021-00717-5