Main

The transition from fetal to neonatal life is frequently accompanied by a need for resuscitation with assisted ventilation. Guidelines issued by the American Academy of Pediatrics for neonatal resuscitation have traditionally recommended the use of 100% O2 (1). Over the past two decades, the presumed benefits of pure O2 under these conditions have begun to be challenged. Saugstad and colleagues (2) were the first to show that use of room air was as effective as 100% O2 in securing the survival of severely asphyxiated newborns while suggesting that room air might not possess the potentially dangerous side effects that 100% O2 presented. The potential dangers of 100% O2 are illustrated in data of Vento et al. (3), showing that hyperoxic exposure following hypoxia causes greater oxidative stress than the use of a normoxic gas mixture. Recent recommendations are proposing a role for resuscitation with less than 100% O2, and intermediate values are being discussed, although the practical aspects and functional consequences remain to be determined (4).

To date, studies addressing the effect of assisted ventilation with supplemental O2 on the onset of respiration have been limited to trials in human neonates, such as the RESAIR 2 study (2). Such human studies have shown a delayed onset of both first cry and sustained respiratory effort when resuscitation is performed with 100% O2 (3,4). To our knowledge, there have been no animal studies investigating the time to onset of spontaneous respiration following central apnea induced by hypoxic depression of breathing. Such investigation would provide more quantifiable data and eliminate some of the restrictions that accompany clinical trials. Piglets have been used to evaluate the effects of hyperoxic exposure on molecular and biochemical markers of lung and brain injury (5,6). However, the piglet model presents limitations, in particular its relative maturity at birth and difficulty evaluating longer-term outcome measures. Therefore, in this study we have developed a rat pup model to test the efficacies of 21% and 40% O2 against that of 100% O2 in reinitiation of spontaneous respiratory activity following hypoxia induced apnea. We hypothesized that both 21% and 40% O2 would shorten the time to onset of spontaneous respiratory activity when compared with resuscitation with the traditional standard of 100% O2.

METHODS

Animal model and experimental protocol.

The present study was conducted on Sprague-Dawley rats, 8–10 d old (22 g) and the protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. The rat pups were anesthetized using urethane at a dosage of 2.5 g/kg delivered via intraperitoneal injection, and then immobilized in the supine position. Urethane was used because it does not significantly depress central respiratory drive. Stainless steel EMG electrodes (0.13 mm bare, 0.18 mm coated) were then inserted through the abdomen to record diaphragmatic activity.

The study protocol is shown in Figure 1. All pups were orally intubated using an endotracheal tube (inner diameter, 0.76 mm; outer diameter, 1.22 mm) (7). After a brief period of mechanical ventilation to ensure adequate tube placement, the endotracheal tube was disconnected from the ventilator and baseline respiratory activity was recorded. The endotracheal tube was then reconnected to the ventilator, and the animals were ventilated with 5% O2 (volume, 0.1 mL/10 g; rate, 35 cycles/min) until apnea was induced, as determined by a cessation of diaphragmatic activity. Ventilation with 5% O2 was then continued for an additional 90 s after induction of apnea. At this point, the ventilation gas was switched from 5% O2 to study gas comprising either 100% O2 or 21% O2 (n = 10) for 30 s at a ventilator rate of 60/min. This period of study gas administration constituted the resuscitation period (Fig. 1). Following the 30 s resuscitation period, the ventilator was disconnected during the recovery period and onset of spontaneous diaphragmatic activity was quantified. Time to onset of spontaneous diaphragmatic activity was measured from the beginning of the resuscitation period. Following 45 min after the onset of the first breath, the identical protocol was performed with the alternate gas. The principal investigator was not blinded to the resuscitation gas, however, a standardized protocol of ventilatory management was systematically followed. In successive animals, the order of exposure to the resuscitation gas (100% versus 21%) was alternated to compensate for any potential decline in the animals condition over the course of the experiment. The same protocol was used to compare 100% O2 and 40% O2 in an additional group of rat pups (n = 11). Data were only evaluated in animals that survived both resuscitation protocols. Data from 3 of 24 animals were not analyzed as the rat pup did not survive the second resuscitation. Thus, data from 21 animals were available between the two study protocols (100% versus 21% O2 and 100% versus 40% O2). Each of the three animals that died did so during or immediately after the second exposure, which constituted 100% in two and 21% in the third.

Figure 1
figure 1

Experimental design. During the control period, the pups were intubated but not connected to a ventilator. During mechanical ventilation, the pups were initially ventilated with 5% O2 to induce apnea, as illustrated by the cessation of diaphragmatic activity. They continued to be ventilated with 5% O2 for an additional 90 s and then were resuscitated with the study gas for 30 s. The ventilator was then disconnected and the return of diaphragm EMG quantified.

Additional animals were studied using the same experimental protocol as for the physiologic study to obtain blood gas data. After intubation, and before exposure to ventilation with hypoxic gas, an incision was made lengthwise over the trachea, the tissue was retracted, and the carotid artery was exposed. In six animals, blood gas samples were then collected following the 90 s of apnea that preceded resuscitation. In three other groups (n = 6 for each group), blood gas samples were collected immediately following 30 s exposure to the study gas (21%, 40%, or 100% O2). Finally, a blood gas was additionally collected upon onset of respiratory activity after 21% and 100% O2 resuscitation from five and four pups, respectively. Each animal could only be used for a single blood gas sample.

In six animals, additional ECG electrodes were inserted on the chest to collect heart rate data during 100% O2 and room air resuscitation. A baseline heart rate was established after intubation and before ventilation. Heart rate values were compared when apnea was induced, before resuscitation, immediately after resuscitation and following recovery.

Data collection and statistical analysis.

Diaphragmatic EMG and ECG were recorded using PowerLab hardware and Chart software in real time at a 2000-Hz sampling rate. The signal band pass for EMG recording was 0.03–1 kHz and for ECG recording was 0.01–1 kHz. Within the Chart software, instantaneous heart rate was determined using the cyclic measurements tool. Data were analyzed using MatLab software for amplitude and frequency of diaphragmatic activity. Apnea was defined as an expiratory time longer than 15 s. Onset of spontaneous respiratory activity was defined as the first diaphragmatic EMG that exhibited an amplitude of at least 10% of the diaphragmatic activity before hypoxic ventilation. We compared time to the onset of spontaneous diaphragm EMG between resuscitation with 100% O2 and either 21% or 40% O2 using a paired t test.

Restoration of minute ventilation was also examined by computing minute diaphragm activity (diaphragm EMG × frequency per minute) as an index of minute ventilation. MatLab software was used to determine the area under individual bursts in the diaphragmatic EMG. We analyzed bursts over 5-s periods to determine the average burst at a given time frame. Sampling occurred at 30s, 60s, 90s, and 120s following the onset of spontaneous respiration. By using the average burst and frequency data, we calculated minute diaphragm activity. Because the measured diaphragm activity varied on each animal due to the placement of EMG electrodes, the data were normalized by examining the restoration of minute ventilation as a percentage of the control (expressed as 100%) before hypoxic ventilation for each animal. Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures was used to compare restoration of minute diaphragm activity between groups.

Blood gas samples collected via the carotid artery were analyzed using an ABL5 from Radiometer America (Westlake, OH). Blood gas status in response to the various resuscitation gases was compared using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Newman-Keuls analysis.

Data collected by ECG electrodes were examined by comparing deviation from a baseline heart rate. One- and two-way ANOVA were used to determine whether heart rate differed between groups resuscitated with different O2 concentrations. All data in this manuscript are expressed as mean ± SD.

RESULTS

All data were collected from animals that were exposed to both resuscitation gases comprising 100% and 21% O2 or 100% and 40% O2. We found a delayed onset of diaphragmatic discharge in rat pups resuscitated with 100% O2 versus room air. Figure 2 shows the individual times to onset of breathing within each experimental group. Figure 3 presents summary data for the mean time to onset of spontaneous respiration in both experimental groups. A significant difference (p = 0.002) was found in the time to onset of spontaneous respiration between the room air (36 ± 21 s) and 100% O2 (72 ± 22 s) groups. This difference was apparently independent of the order of gas exposure. In contrast, there was no difference found between the use of 40% O2 (84 ± 27 s) and 100% O2 (76 ± 23 s).

Figure 2
figure 2

Individual results of onset of respiratory effort. Time to onset of diaphragm EMG during resuscitation with study gas is shown for each pup. (A) Onset of respiratory activity was delayed when 100% O2 was compared with 21% O2 (p = 0.002), n = 10. (B) In a separate group of rat pups, onset of respiratory activity was comparable between resuscitation with 100% O2 and 40% O2, n = 11.

Figure 3
figure 3

Grouped results of time to onset of respiratory effort. Summary data for time to onset of spontaneous respiration between experimental groups comparing 100% O2 vs 21% O2 and 100% O2 vs 40% O2. *Significant difference (p = 0.002) in comparing the 100% O2 group against 21% O2, n = 10. There was no difference between 100% O2 and 40% O2, n = 11.

In addition to onset of spontaneous respiratory activity, we compared the restoration of minute ventilation once spontaneous respiratory activity occurred. While room air was more effective in initiating onset of respiration there was no significant difference in restoration of minute ventilation between experimental groups (100% versus 21% or 100% versus 40%) once diaphragmatic activity began (Fig. 4).

Figure 4
figure 4

Restoration of minute ventilatory effort. Restoration of minute diaphragm activity did not differ when comparing (A)100% O2 vs 21% O2 (n = 10) and (B) 100% O2 vs 40% O2 (n = 11) resuscitation. There was considerable variability within the data as can be seen in the error bars that represent SD. Solid squares represent 21% and 40% oxygen, respectively; open circles represent 100% oxygen.

Arterial blood gas samples were collected at two points in the protocol; immediately following 90 s of apnea, before exposure to any of the study gases, and immediately following 30 s of exposure to each study gas. Blood gas status before resuscitation was as follows: pH = 7.45 ± 9 × 10−9[H+], arterial oxygen tension (Pao2) = 26 ± 3 mm Hg, arterial carbon dioxide tension (Paco2) = 30 ± 7 mm Hg, O2 saturation = 51 ± 10% and bicarbonate = 20 ± 2 mM. Comparison of blood gas status after 30 s exposure to each study gas is shown in Table 1. As expected, there was an overall increase in Pao2 (p < 0.0001, ANOVA) and Sao2 (p < 0.0001, ANOVA) corresponding to the increase in O2 concentration of the study gas (Table 1). There was no effect of supplemental O2 on pH, however, there was a decrease in Paco2 (p < 0.05, ANOVA) and bicarbonate (p < 0.05, ANOVA) in pups resuscitated with supplemental O2. Pao2 and Paco2 data were also obtained at onset of spontaneous respiratory activity after resuscitation with 100% O2 (n = 4) and 21% O2 (n = 5). In the 100% O2 group Pao2 = 63 ± 7 mm Hg, Paco2 = 44 ± 14 mm Hg and in the 21% O2 group Pao2 = 66 ± 10 mm Hg, Paco2 = 35 ± 5 mm Hg.

Table 1 Blood gas status following 30 s resuscitation with study gas

We also chose to examine whether 100% O2 and room air resuscitation had varying effects on heart rate. As seen in Figure 5, there was no change in heart rate from baseline during the experimental protocol (one-way ANOVA) and no difference between the 100% O2 and room air groups (two-way ANOVA). Because no difference was found when comparing onset of respiration between the 40% and 100% O2 groups, we did not examine heart rate data between these two groups.

Figure 5
figure 5

Heart rate activity during experiments. Average heart rate of the pups during the stages of the experiment in which heart rate was evaluated: (1) control, (2) onset of apnea, (3) before resuscitation, (4) following resuscitation, and (5) after recovery. There was no change in heart rate during the experiments or between groups. Solid squares represent 21% oxygen and open circles represent 100% oxygen.

DISCUSSION

Previous clinical studies have shown that when neonatal resuscitation is performed with room air, the time to onset of first cry and initiation of a sustained respiratory pattern are reduced when compared with the use of 100% O2 (2,3). These findings are largely based on observational data rather than a quantifiable measure of respiratory activity. We therefore sought to develop an immature animal model that would allow us to quantify the effect of resuscitation gas at onset of spontaneous diaphragmatic activity. Our findings confirm those of available clinical studies comparing 100% O2 versus room air resuscitation. In addition, we have examined an intermediate level of supplemental O2, 40%, compared its efficacy to that of the current standard of 100% O2, and found no difference between the two gases with regards to onset of respiratory activity.

It is well known that neonatal exposure to hypoxia results in a biphasic respiratory response (8). This comprises an initial excitation of respiration secondary to excitation of peripheral chemoreceptors, followed by a central depression of respiration. We used exposure to 5% O2 to elicit apnea in our model as low O2 tension probably contributes to inhibition of fetal respiratory activity and the respiratory depression during perinatal asphyxia. While hypoxic exposure always elicited apnea, there was variability in the time from onset of hypoxic exposure to onset of apnea. Therefore, we continued exposure with 5% O2 for an additional 90 s to standardize the protocol between rat pups.

During hypoxia, sustained increase in peripheral chemoreceptor drive will oppose central depression of respiration. Hence, hyperoxia during resuscitation should suppress peripheral chemoreceptor drive and delay reinitiation of breathing. This was first proposed by Dejours (9) and, more recently, adapted for the infant in studies by Bouferrache et al. (10). We hypothesized this to be a likely mechanism for the delayed onset of respiration when resuscitation with 100% O2 is compared with the use of 21% O2. Our blood gas results indicate that, as with 100% O2, 40% O2 also creates a hyperoxemic environment, explaining the similar time to onset of respiratory activity when compared with 100% O2. It is interesting to note quantitative similarities regarding onset of respiratory activity between the current data and human infant data from Saugstad and the RESAIR 2 study (2). Saugstad observed that the first breath occurred 1 min after beginning resuscitation with room air and after 1.5 min when 100% was used. We also found a difference of approximately 30 s between the onset of respiratory efforts when 21% and 100% O2 were compared. The fact that once initiation of respiratory activity began we found no difference in restoration of minute diaphragm activity leads us to believe that the difference found by Vento et al. (3) in time to sustained respiratory pattern may be attributed to the initial delay in onset of inspiration and not the recovery of rhythmic breathing.

Factors other than blood gas status (e.g. sensory stimuli or chemical mediators) have been proposed to contribute to onset of continuous breathing after birth (9). Jansen et al. (11) found that fetal carotid chemoreceptors are not essential for the establishment of effective breathing at birth in the lamb. Similarly, Hertzberg et al. (12) showed that arterial chemoreceptors are active and responsive in the fetal lamb, but that their sensitivity is adjusted to the low fetal arterial O2 tension and that after birth the chemoreceptors become silent and gradually reset their sensitivity. While our blood gas data revealed an anticipated incremental increase in Pao2 with increasing supplemental O2 resuscitation, we did not predict that supplemental O2 during resuscitation would result in the observed decrease in Paco2. This may occur via more rapid relief of pulmonary vasoconstriction in a hyperoxic environment and enhanced CO2 elimination, although the effect of hyperoxic resuscitation on pulmonary artery function remains controversial (13,14). Whatever the cause, the possibility that hypocapnia, during resuscitation with supplemental O2, contributed to the delayed onset of breathing cannot be excluded as hyperoxemia and hypocapnia occurred in both groups resuscitated with supplemental O2. Further study is clearly appropriate to document whether hypocapnia is consistently associated with hyperoxic resuscitation. Such hypocapnia, if severe, could have potential detrimental effects on cerebral blood flow.

We recognize several reservations regarding our experimental model. Blood gases collected at the end of the apneic period before resuscitation were consistent with hypoxic respiratory depression but showed no evidence of metabolic or respiratory acidosis as one would expect in asphyxiated newborns. As the rat pups were continuously ventilated during hypoxic exposure, hypercapnia did not occur. This blood gas status was consistently observed in our animal model before resuscitation and should not have influenced our comparison of respiratory response to resuscitation with varying concentrations of O2. We did attempt to replicate CO2 accumulation by adding CO2 concentrations as low as 1% to the hypoxic gas that was used to induce apnea, however, use of a hypercapnic, hypoxic gas failed to induce apnea and, thus, we were unable to conduct our experiments. An alternate approach to normalize Paco2 might have been to actually administer supplemental CO2 during resuscitation, however, this strategy is not consistent with current clinical practice. We speculate that the lower bicarbonate levels observed during hyperoxic resuscitation may be secondary to systemic vasodilatation and greater release of lactic acid from tissues previously deprived of O2.

Another limitation of our model was that the experiments were not performed during the actual transition from fetal to neonatal life. While we chose a rat pup model due to the animal's relative immaturity at birth, our experiments took place 8–10 d after birth at a time when the animal's maturation approaches term gestation in the human. It has previously been shown that the cerebral cortex of a 12–13-d-old rat pup has similar maturation as that of a full-term newborn human infant (15). This postnatal age was chosen because of our ability to readily intubate and ventilate the rat pups at and beyond 8 d of age. Future studies might focus on comparable resuscitation protocols in rat pups closer to the transition from fetal to neonatal life.

Although our primary goal was to determine the effect of resuscitation gas on the onset of respiration, we also examined heart rate response as an important component of the resuscitation response. We found no significant effect on heart rate between the two resuscitation gases examined, 100% and 21% O2. This suggests that 21% O2 is no less suitable for use during resuscitation, although the absence of significant bradycardia during hypoxic exposure limits any conclusions we can make. Ideally, we would have also measured cardiac output, however, due to the size of the animals and the invasive nature of the procedure, we determined that this procedure would have compromised our primary data collection.

We conclude that our novel rat pup model allows an accurate assessment of the relative efficacies of 100% O2, 40% O2, and room air in reinitiating respiratory efforts following apnea. Our studies show that, under conditions of mild hypocarbia, even modest levels of supplemental O2, such as 40% O2, cause hyperoxia and delay the onset of spontaneous respiratory efforts. The latter may be clinically relevant if it results in a prolonged duration of ventilatory support, potentially predisposing to morbidity associated with neonatal lung injury. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation recently concluded that there is currently not enough evidence to specify the concentration of O2 to be used during resuscitation (16). Our findings suggest that resuscitation with supplemental O2 may place infants in both a hyperoxemic and hypocapnic state, which may be detrimental to neonatal well-being. Because of this potential danger, studies such as the current one are therefore needed to further investigate the effects that varying levels of O2 concentration have on resuscitation efforts and the corresponding physiologic responses.