Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A closer view of the conformation of the Lac repressor bound to operator

Abstract

Crystal structures of the Lac repressor, with and without isopropylthiogalactoside (IPTG), and the repressor bound to operator have provided a model for how the binding of the inducer reduces the affinity of the repressor for the operator. However, because of the low resolution of the operator-bound structure (4.8 Å), the model for the allosteric transition was presented in terms of structural elements rather than in terms of side chain interactions. Here we have constructed a dimeric Lac repressor and determined its structure at 2.6 Å resolution in complex with a symmetric operator and the anti-inducer orthonitrophenylfucoside (ONPF). The structure enables the induced (IPTG-bound) and repressed (operator-bound) conformations of the repressor to be compared in atomic detail. An extensive network of interactions between the DNA-binding and core domains of the repressor suggests a possible mechanism for the allosteric transition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Structure of the dimeric Lac repressor bound to operator and ONPF.
Figure 2: Comparison of the conformations of the Lac repressor bound to operator and inducer.
Figure 3: Interactions of the Lac repressor with operator and ONPF.
Figure 4: Interactions at the dimer interface of the repressor.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

Protein Data Bank

References

  1. Jacob, F. & Monod, J. J. Mol. Biol. 3, 318–356 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Monod, J., Wyman, J. & Changeux, J.-P. J. Mol. Biol. 12, 88– 118 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gilbert, W. & Muller-Hill, B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 56, 1891–1898 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilbert, W. In Protein-Ligand Interactions (eds Sund, H. & Blauer, G.) 193 (Walterde Gruyter, Berlin; 1975).

  5. Mueller-Hill, B., Rickenberg, H.V. & Wallenfels, K. J. Mol. Biol. 10, 303– 318 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacob, F. & Monod, J. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 26, 193–211 ( 1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Riggs, A.D., Newby, R.F. & Bourgeois, S. J. Mol. Biol. 51, 303– 314 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis, M. et al. Science 271, 1247–1254 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman, A.M., Fischmann, T.O. & Steitz, T.A. Science 268, 1721– 1727 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chuprina, V.P. et al. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 446– 462 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Slijper, M., Bonvin, A.M., Boelens, R. & Kaptein, R. J. Mol. Biol. 259, 761–773 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spronk, C.A., Slijper, M., van Boom, J.H., Kaptein, R. & Boelens, R. Nature Struct. Biol. 3, 916–919 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lehming, N., Sartorius, J., Oehler, S., von Wilcken-Bergmann, B. & Muller-Hill, B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 7947–7951 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Alberti, S., Oehler, S., von Wilcken-Bergmann, B., Kramer, H. & Muller-Hill, B. New Biol. 3, 57–62 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, J. & Matthews, K.S. J. Biol. Chem. 267 , 13843–13850 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Markiewicz, P., Kleina, L., Cruz, C., Ehret, S. & Miller, J.H. J. Mol. Biol. 240, 421– 433 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Spronk, C.A.E.M. et al. Structure 7, 1483– 1492 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pace, H.C. et al. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 334– 339 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barry, J.K. & Matthews, K.S. Biochemistry 38, 3579–3590 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Falcon, C.M. & Matthews K.S., J. Biol. Chem. 274 , 30849–30857 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schumacher, M.A., Choi, K.Y., Zalkin, H. & Brennan, R.G. Science 266, 763–770 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schumacher, M.A., Choi, K.Y., Lu, F., Zalkin, H. & Brennan, R.G. Cell 83, 147– 155 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Navaza, J. Acta Crystallogr. D50, 157–163 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones, T.A., Zhou, J.-Y., Cowan, S.W. & Kjeldgaard, M. Acta Crystallogr. A47, 110–119 ( 1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Brünger, A.T. X-PLOR Version 3.1: A system for X-ray Crystallography and NMR. (Yale University Press New Haven, Connecticut; 1992).

  26. Brünger, A.T. et al. Acta Crystallogr. D54, 905– 921 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Adams, P.D., Pannu, N.S., Read, R.J. & Brunger, A.T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 5018–5023 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Brünger, A.T. Nature 355, 472–475 ( 1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee, B. & Richards, F.M. J. Mol. Biol. 55, 379–400 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kraulis, P. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 946–950 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Merritt, E.A. & Bacon, D.J. Methods Enzymol. 277 , 505–524 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank G. Van Duyne and P. Lu for useful discussions. This work was supported by an NIH grant to M.L. and an NIH NRSA to C.E.B. The work is based upon research conducted at the NSLS beamline X25 and at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (CHESS) with the use of the Macromolecular Diffraction at CHESS (MacCHESS) facility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitchell Lewis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, C., Lewis, M. A closer view of the conformation of the Lac repressor bound to operator . Nat Struct Mol Biol 7, 209–214 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/73317

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/73317

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing