Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Screening

FRAX® in clinical practice

Assigning osteoporosis treatment on the basis of bone mineral density alone is difficult, and incorporating even simple clinical risk factors into the decision-making process is challenging. When launched, the FRAX® risk assessment tool was met, unsurprisingly, with both enthusiasm and skepticism; despite improvements, some obstacles still prevent its universal implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Kanis, J. A. et al. Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice. Osteoporos. Int. 22, 2395–2411 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. [No authors listed] Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ. Tech. Rep. Ser. 843, 1–129 (1994).

  3. Kanis, J. A., on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group (2008). Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary healthcare level. Technical report. WHO Collaborating Centre. University of Sheffield, UK. http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/ (2008).

  4. Lyles, K. W. et al. Zoledronic acid and clinical fracture and mortality after hip fracture. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 1799–1809 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolland, M. J., Grey, A. B., Gamble, G. D. & Reid, I. R. Effect of osteoporosis treatment on mortality: a meta-analysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 95, 1174–1181 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marshall, D., Johnell, O. & Wedel, H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312, 1254–1259 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Abrahamsen, B. et al. Discordance between changes in bone mineral density measured at different skeletal sites in perimenopausal women—implications for assessment of bone loss and response to therapy: The Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 16, 1212–1219 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leslie, W. D. et al. Spine–hip discordance and fracture risk assessment: a physician-friendly FRAX enhancement. Osteoporos. Int. 22, 839–847 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Giangregorio, L. M. & Leslie, W. D. Time since prior fracture is a risk modifier for 10-year osteoporotic fractures. J. Bone Miner. Res. 25, 1400–1405 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author has received grant/research support from Amgen, Merck, Novartis, NPS Pharmaceuticals, and Nycomed; consulting fees from Amgen, Merck and Nycomed; and speakers bureau from Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck and Nycomed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abrahamsen, B. FRAX® in clinical practice. Nat Rev Rheumatol 7, 686–688 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2011.155

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2011.155

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing