Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Pharmacotherapy

How well can we compare different biologic agents for RA?

Given a lack of head-to-head comparisons of the efficacy and safety of different biologic agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, can we instead compare systematic reviews that assess one agent at a time, or does heterogeneity between studies limit the usefulness of this approach?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. The Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group. What is a systematic review? [online], (2010).

  2. Singh, J. A. et al. Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4. Article No.: CD007848. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007848.pub2 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smolen, J. S., Aletaha, D., Koeller, M., Weisman, M. & Emery, P. New therapies for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 370, 1861–1874 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. van Vollenhoven, R. F. et al. Addition of infliximab compared with addition of sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine to methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (Swefot trial): 1-year results of a randomised trial. Lancet 374, 459–466 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Emery, P. et al. Early referral recommendation for newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis: evidence based development of a clinical guide. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 61, 290–297 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schoels, M. et al. Follow-up standards and treatment targets in rheumatoid arthritis (RA): results of a questionnaire at the EULAR 2008. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 69, 631–637 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Luce, B. R. et al. Rethinking randomized clinical trials for comparative effectiveness research: the need for transformational change. Ann. Intern. Med. 151, 206–209 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Smolen, J. S. et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann. Rheum. Dis. (in press).

  9. Gaujoux-Viala, C. et al. Current evidence for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. (in press).

  10. Nam, J. L. et al. Current evidence for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of RA. Ann. Rheum. Dis. (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author has acted as a consultant for and has received grant support and/or honoraria from Abbott, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centocor, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB and Wyeth, and has acted as a consultant for Amgen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smolen, J. How well can we compare different biologic agents for RA?. Nat Rev Rheumatol 6, 247–248 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2010.58

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2010.58

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing