Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Year in Review
  • Published:

Small bowel endoscopy in 2013

The reality and the potential

2013 saw several advances in small bowel endoscopy: new 3D visualization software, increased battery life, side-viewing cameras and higher frame rate. Studies on prokinetics for patient preparation, safety in the elderly, rebleeding after negative capsule endoscopy and defining optimum training requirements for fellows were encouraging. Procedure time and small bowel length evaluated by double-balloon and spiral endoscopy were shown to be comparable.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Lewis, B. & Goldfarb, N. Review article: The advent of capsule endoscopy—a not-so-futuristic approach to obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 17, 1085–1096 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Koulaouzidis, A. et al. Three-dimensional representation software as image enhancement tool in small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a feasibility study. Dig. Liver Dis. 45, 909–914 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedrich, K., Gehrke, S., Stremmel, W. & Sieg, A. First clinical trial of a newly developed capsule endoscope with panoramic side view for small bowel: a pilot study. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 28, 1496–1501 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Karargyris, A. A. & Koulaouzidis, A. Capsule-odometer: a concept to improve accurate lesion localisation. World J. Gastroenterol. 19, 5943–5946 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Koulaouzidis, A., Giannakou, A., Yung, D. E., Dabos, K. J. & Plevris, J. N. Do prokinetics influence the completion rate in small-bowel capsule endoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 29, 1171–1185 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rajan, E. et al. Training in small-bowel capsule endoscopy: assessing and defining competency. Gastrointest. Endosc. 78, 617–622 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gomez, V. et al. Safety of capsule endoscopy in the octogenarian as compared with younger patients. Gastrointest. Endosc. 78, 744–749 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Riccioni, M. E. et al. Negative capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding reliable: recurrence of bleeding on long-term follow-up. World J. Gastroenterol. 19, 4520–4525 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rahmi, G. et al. Multicenter comparison of double-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 28, 992–998 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uday C. Ghoshal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghoshal, U. The reality and the potential. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11, 86–87 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.257

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.257

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing