Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Surgery

Are bioprosthetic plugs for complex anal fistulas effective?

Surgical repair of complex anal fistulas has to achieve a balance between optimal primary healing and best preservation of continence. As traditional surgical techniques confer a risk of continence deterioration, innovative sphincter-preserving techniques have been introduced. A new study indicates that use of bioprosthetic plugs in the surgical treatment of complex anal fistulas is associated with a long-term success rate of 81%.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Ellis, C. N., Rostas, J. W. & Greiner, F. G. Long-term outcomes with the use of bioprosthetic plugs for the management of complex anal fistulas. Dis. Colon Rectum 53, 798–802 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Champagne, B. J. et al. Efficacy of anal fistula plug in closure of cryptoglandular fistulas: long-term follow-up. Dis. Colon Rectum 49, 1817–1821 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O'Connor, L. M. et al. Efficacy of anal fistula plug in closure of Crohn's anorectal fistulas. Dis. Colon Rectum 49, 1569–1573 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson, E. K., Gaw, J. U. & Armstrong, D. N. Efficacy of anal fistula plug vs. fibrin glue in closure of anorectal fistulas. Dis. Colon Rectum 49, 371–376 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwandner, O., Stadler, F., Dietl, O., Wirsching, R. P. & Fuerst, A. Initial experience on efficacy in closure of cryptoglandular and Crohn's transsphincteric fistulas by the use of the anal fistula plug. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 23, 319–324 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellis, C. N. Bioprosthetic plugs for complex anal fistulas: an early experience. J. Surg. Educ. 64, 36–40 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ky, A. J. et al. Collagen fistula plug for the treatment of anal fistulas. Dis. Colon Rectum 51, 838–843 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Safar, B et al. Anal fistula plug: initial experience and outcomes. Dis. Colon Rectum 52, 248–252 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Christoforidis, D., Pieh, M. C., Madoff, R. D. & Mellgren, A. F. Treatment of transsphincteric anal fistulas by endorectal advancement flap or collagen fistula plug: a comparative study. Dis. Colon Rectum 52, 18–22 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ortiz, H. et al. Randomized clinical trial of anal fistula plug versus endorectal advancement flap for the treatment of high cryptoglandular fistula in ano. Br. J. Surg. 96, 608–612 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwandner, O. Are bioprosthetic plugs for complex anal fistulas effective?. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 7, 419–420 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2010.110

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2010.110

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing