Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Rectal cancer

The evolution of laparoscopy—what's next?

Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology volume 6, pages 322–324 (2009)Cite this article

Despite advances in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, the role of laparoscopic approaches for rectal cancer remains controversial. A large, single-center study has now demonstrated the safety and feasibility of laparoscopy for rectal cancer, which provides new incentives for prospective clinical trials to rigorously test this surgical approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Larson, D. W., Dozois, E. J., Sandborn, W. J. & Cima, R. R. Total laparoscopic proctocolectomy with Brooke ileostomy: a novel incisionless surgical treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis. Surg. Endosc. 10, 1284–1287 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ng, K. H. et al. Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancers: lessons learned from 579 cases. Ann. Surg. 249, 82–86 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. COST Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 2050–2059 (2004).

  4. Guillou, P. J. et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365, 1718–1726 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Veldkamp, R. et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 6, 477–484 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tjandra, J. J. et al. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis. Colon Rectum 48, 411–423 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Soop, M. & Nelson, H. Is laparoscopic resection appropriate for colorectal adenocarcinoma? Adv. Surg. 42, 205–217 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ACOSOG. Announcements. ACOSOG website [online] (2009).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Heidi Nelson

Authors
  1. Heidi Nelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidi Nelson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, H. The evolution of laparoscopy—what's next?. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 6, 322–324 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2009.82

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2009.82

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing