Mitelman, F., Johansson, B. & Mertens, F.
The impact of translocations and gene fusions on cancer causation. Nature Rev. Cancer
7, 233–245 (2007).
Ricke, R. M., van Ree, J. H. & van Deursen, J. M.
Whole chromosome instability and cancer: a complex relationship. Trends Genet.
24, 457–466 (2008).
Teixeira, M. R. & Heim, S.
Multiple numerical chromosome aberrations in cancer: what are their causes and what are their consequences?
Semin. Cancer Biol.
15, 3–12 (2005).
Schvartzman, J. M., Sotillo, R. & Benezra, R.
Mitotic chromosomal instability and cancer: mouse modelling of the human disease. Nature Rev. Cancer
10, 102–115 (2010).
et al. Constitutional aneuploidy and cancer predisposition caused by biallelic mutations in BUB1B. Nature Genet.
36, 1159–1161 (2004).
Thompson, S. L. & Compton, D. A.
Chromosomes and cancer cells. Chromosome Res.
19, 433–444 (2011).
Thompson, S. L., Bakhoum, S. F. & Compton, D. A.
Mechanisms of chromosomal instability. Curr. Biol.
20, R285–R295 (2010).
Chandhok, N. S. & Pellman, D.
A little CIN may cost a lot: revisiting aneuploidy and cancer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
19, 74–81 (2009).
et al. The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature
463, 899–905 (2010). This study shows that one-quarter of the genome of a typical cancer cell is affected by either whole-arm or whole-chromosome somatic copy number alterations.
Mitelman, F., Johannson, B. & Mertens, F.
Mitelman Database of Chromosome Aberrations in Cancer
Ozery-Flato, M., Linhart, C., Trakhtenbrot, L., Izraeli, S. & Shamir, R.
Large-scale analysis of chromosomal aberrations in cancer karyotypes reveals two distinct paths to aneuploidy. Genome Biol.
12, R61 (2011).
Barnard, D. R.
et al. Morphologic, immunologic, and cytogenetic classification of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome in childhood: a report from the Childrens Cancer Group. Leukemia
10, 5–12 (1996).
et al. Frequency and implications of chromosome 8 and 12 gains in Ewing sarcoma. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet.
100, 106–110 (1998).
et al. Trisomies 8 and 20 in desmoid tumors. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet.
92, 147–149 (1996).
Barnard, D. R.
et al. Acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome in children treated for cancer: comparison with primary presentation. Blood
100, 427–434 (2002).
Paulsson, K. & Johansson, B.
Trisomy 8 as the sole chromosomal aberration in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Pathol. Biol.
55, 37–48 (2007).
Thompson, S. L. & Compton, D. A.
Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells. J. Cell Biol.
180, 665–672 (2008).
Cimini, D., Tanzarella, C. & Degrassi, F.
Differences in malsegregation rates obtained by scoring ana-telophases or binucleate cells. Mutagenesis
14, 563–568 (1999).
Compton, D. A.
Mechanisms of aneuploidy. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
23, 109–113 (2011).
Merotelic kinetochore orientation, aneuploidy, and cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1786, 32–40 (2008).
et al. Merotelic kinetochore orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy in mitotic mammalian tissue cells. J. Cell Biol.
153, 517–527 (2001).
Gregan, J., Polakova, S., Zhang, L., Tolic´-Nørrelykke, I. M. & Cimini, D.
Merotelic kinetochore attachment: causes and effects. Trends Cell Biol.
21, 374–381 (2011).
Ganem, N. J., Godinho, S. A. & Pellman, D.
A mechanism linking extra centrosomes to chromosomal instability. Nature
460, 278–282 (2009). This study provides a mechanistic link between extra centrosomes and CIN by demonstrating that supernumerary centrosomes increase the frequency of merotelic attachments and chromosome segregation errors.
Silkworth, W. T., Nardi, I. K., Scholl, L. M. & Cimini, D.
Multipolar spindle pole coalescence is a major source of kinetochore mis-attachment and chromosome mis-segregation in cancer cells. PLoS ONE
4, e6564 (2009).
Bakhoum, S. F., Genovese, G. & Compton, D. A.
Deviant kinetochore microtubule dynamics underlie chromosomal instability. Curr. Biol.
19, 1937–1942 (2009).
Tada, K., Susumu, H., Sakuno, T. & Watanabe, Y.
Condensin association with histone H2A shapes mitotic chromosomes. Nature
474, 477–483 (2011).
Corbett, K. D.
et al. The monopolin complex crosslinks kinetochore components to regulate chromosome-microtubule attachments. Cell
142, 556–567 (2010).
Bakhoum, S. F., Thompson, S. L., Manning, A. L. & Compton, D. A.
Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics. Nature Cell Biol.
11, 27–35 (2009).
Nigg, E. A.
Origins and consequences of centrosome aberrations in human cancers. Int. J. Cancer
119, 2717–2723 (2006).
Pihan, G. A.
et al. Centrosome defects and genetic instability in malignant tumors. Cancer Res.
58, 3974–3985 (1998).
Pihan, G. A., Wallace, J., Zhou, Y. & Doxsey, S. J.
Centrosome abnormalities and chromosome instability occur together in pre-invasive carcinomas. Cancer Res.
63, 1398–1404 (2003).
Nigg, E. A.
Centrosome aberrations: cause or consequence of cancer progression?
Nature Rev. Cancer
2, 815–825 (2002).
The Origin of Malignant Tumors (Waverly Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1929).
Holland, A. J. & Cleveland, D. W.
Boveri revisited: chromosomal instability, aneuploidy and tumorigenesis. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.
10, 478–487 (2009).
Brinkley, B. R.
Managing the centrosome numbers game: from chaos to stability in cancer cell division. Trends Cell Biol.
11, 18–21 (2001).
Ring, D., Hubble, R. & Kirschner, M.
Mitosis in a cell with multiple centrioles. J. Cell Biol.
94, 549–556 (1982).
Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W. & Vogelstein, B.
Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature
386, 623–627 (1997).
Rajagopalan, H., Nowak, M. A., Vogelstein, B. & Lengauer, C.
The significance of unstable chromosomes in colorectal cancer. Nature Rev. Cancer
3, 695–701 (2003).
Cahill, D. P.
et al. Characterization of MAD2B and other mitotic spindle checkpoint genes. Genomics
58, 181–187 (1999).
et al. Molecular analysis of the mitotic checkpoint genes BUB1, BUBR1 and BUB3 in human lung cancers. Cancer Lett.
162, 201–205 (2001).
Myrie, K. A., Percy, M. J., Azim, J. N., Neeley, C. K. & Petty, E. M.
Mutation and expression analysis of human BUB1 and BUB1B in aneuploid breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett.
152, 193–199 (2000).
Kops, G. J., Weaver, B. A. & Cleveland, D. W.
On the road to cancer: aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint. Nature Rev. Cancer
5, 773–785 (2005).
et al. Three classes of genes mutated in colorectal cancers with chromosomal instability. Cancer Res.
64, 2998–3001 (2004).
Gascoigne, K. E. & Taylor, S. S.
Cancer cells display profound intra- and interline variation following prolonged exposure to antimitotic drugs. Cancer Cell
14, 111–122 (2008).
Tighe, A., Johnson, V. L., Albertella, M. & Taylor, S. S.
Aneuploid colon cancer cells have a robust spindle checkpoint. EMBO Rep.
2, 609–614 (2001).
et al. Combined BubR1 protein down-regulation and RASSF1A hypermethylation in Wilms tumors with diverse cytogenetic changes. Mol. Carcinog.
47, 660–666 (2008).
Park, H. Y.
et al. Differential promoter methylation may be a key molecular mechanism in regulating BubR1 expression in cancer cells. Exp. Mol. Med.
39, 195–204 (2007).
Morgan, D. O.
The Cell Cycle: Principles of Control (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Maryland, 2007).
Musacchio, A. & Salmon, E. D.
The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.
8, 379–393 (2007).
Barber, T. D.
et al. Chromatid cohesion defects may underlie chromosome instability in human colorectal cancers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA
105, 3443–3448 (2008).
Solomon, D. A.
et al. Mutational inactivation of STAG2 causes aneuploidy in human cancer. Science
333, 1039–1043 (2011).
Cohesin: genomic insights into controlling gene transcription and development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
21, 199–206 (2011).
Torres, E. M., Williams, B. R. & Amon, A.
Aneuploidy: cells losing their balance. Genetics
179, 737–746 (2008).
Torres, E. M.
et al. Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science
317, 916–924 (2007). This study uses a chromosome transfer strategy and selectable markers to generate isogenic aneuploid yeast strains with a single extra chromosome.
Sheltzer, J. M.
et al. Aneuploidy drives genomic instability in yeast. Science
333, 1026–1030 (2011). This study shows that aneuploidy in yeast can generate genomic instability, including increased chromosome loss, mutation rate and defective DNA damage repair.
Niwa, O., Tange, Y. & Kurabayashi, A.
Growth arrest and chromosome instability in aneuploid yeast. Yeast
23, 937–950 (2006).
Williams, B. R.
et al. Aneuploidy affects proliferation and spontaneous immortalization in mammalian cells. Science
322, 703–709 (2008). This study establishes and characterizes isogenic MEF cell lines that are trisomic for chromosomes 1, 13, 16 or 19 using balanced Robertsonian translocations.
Rasmussen, S. A., Wong, L. Y., Yang, Q., May, K. M. & Friedman, J. M.
Population-based analyses of mortality in trisomy 13 and trisomy 18. Pediatrics
111, 777–784 (2003).
Segal, D. J. & McCoy, E. E.
Studies on Down's syndrome in tissue culture. I. Growth rates and protein contents of fibroblast cultures. J. Cell Physiol.
83, 85–90 (1974).
Taylor, A. I.
Cell selection in vivo in normal-G trisomic mosaics. Nature
219, 1028–1030 (1968).
Yurov, Y. B.
et al. Aneuploidy and confined chromosomal mosaicism in the developing human brain. PLoS ONE
2, e558 (2007).
Yurov, Y. B.
et al. The variation of aneuploidy frequency in the developing and adult human brain revealed by an interphase FISH study. J. Histochem. Cytochem.
53, 385–390 (2005).
Gasch, A. P.
et al. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell
11, 4241–4257 (2000).
et al. Aneuploidy confers quantitative proteome changes and phenotypic variation in budding yeast. Nature
468, 321–325 (2010). This study describes the induction of meiosis in yeast strains with an odd ploidy (3N or 5N) to produce isogenic aneuploid strains.
ElBaradi, T. T., van der Sande, C. A., Mager, W. H., Raue, H. A. & Planta, R. J.
The cellular level of yeast ribosomal protein L25 is controlled principally by rapid degradation of excess protein. Curr. Genet.
10, 733–739 (1986).
Maicas, E., Pluthero, F. G. & Friesen, J. D.
The accumulation of three yeast ribosomal proteins under conditions of excess mRNA is determined primarily by fast protein decay. Mol. Cell. Biol.
8, 169–175 (1988).
Torres, E. M.
et al. Identification of aneuploidy-tolerating mutations. Cell
143, 71–83 (2010).
Collier, T. S.
et al. Comparison of stable-isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture and spectral counting for relative quantification of protein expression. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.
25, 2524–2532 (2011).
Collier, T. S.
et al. Direct comparison of stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture and spectral counting for quantitative proteomics. Anal. Chem.
82, 8696–8702 (2010).
St. Charles, J., Hamilton, M. L. & Petes, T. D.
Meiotic chromosome segregation in triploid strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics
186, 537–550 (2010).
et al. Genome-wide genetic analysis of polyploidy in yeast. Nature
443, 541–547 (2006).
Ganem, N. J., Storchova, Z. & Pellman, D.
Tetraploidy, aneuploidy and cancer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
17, 157–162 (2007).
Thompson, S. L. & Compton, D. A.
Proliferation of aneuploid human cells is limited by a p53-dependent mechanism. J. Cell Biol.
188, 369–381 (2010).
Tomasini, R., Mak, T. W. & Melino, G.
The impact of p53 and p73 on aneuploidy and cancer. Trends Cell Biol.
18, 244–252 (2008).
et al. Targeted inactivation of p53 in human cells does not result in aneuploidy. Cancer Res.
62, 1129–1133 (2002).
Kingsbury, M. A.
et al. Aneuploid neurons are functionally active and integrated into brain circuitry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA
102, 6143–6147 (2005).
Rehen, S. K.
et al. Chromosomal variation in neurons of the developing and adult mammalian nervous system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA
98, 13361–13366 (2001).
et al. The ATM–p53 pathway suppresses aneuploidy-induced tumorigenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA
107, 14188–14193 (2010).
Guo, Z., Kozlov, S., Lavin, M. F., Person, M. D. & Paull, T. T.
ATM activation by oxidative stress. Science
330, 517–521 (2010).
Weaver, B. A., Silk, A. D., Montagna, C., Verdier-Pinard, P. & Cleveland, D. W.
Aneuploidy acts both oncogenically and as a tumor suppressor. Cancer Cell
11, 25–36 (2007).
Weaver, B. A. & Cleveland, D. W.
The role of aneuploidy in promoting and suppressing tumors. J. Cell Biol.
185, 935–937 (2009).
Weaver, B. A. & Cleveland, D. W.
The aneuploidy paradox in cell growth and tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell
14, 431–433 (2008).
Manning, A. L., Longworth, M. S. & Dyson, N. J.
Loss of pRB causes centromere dysfunction and chromosomal instability. Genes Dev.
24, 1364–1376 (2010).
Zheng, L. & Lee, W. H.
Retinoblastoma tumor suppressor and genome stability. Adv. Cancer Res.
85, 13–50 (2002).
Knudsen, E. S., Sexton, C. R. & Mayhew, C. N.
Role of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor in the maintenance of genome integrity. Curr. Mol. Med.
6, 749–757 (2006).
Manning, A. L. & Dyson, N. J.
pRB, a tumor suppressor with a stabilizing presence. Trends Cell Biol.
21, 433–441 (2011).
Coschi, C. H.
et al. Mitotic chromosome condensation mediated by the retinoblastoma protein is tumor-suppressive. Genes Dev.
24, 1351–1363 (2010).
van Harn, T.
et al. Loss of Rb proteins causes genomic instability in the absence of mitogenic signaling. Genes Dev.
24, 1377–1388 (2010).
Schvartzman, J. M., Duijf, P. H., Sotillo, R., Coker, C. & Benezra, R.
Mad2 is a critical mediator of the chromosome instability observed upon Rb and p53 pathway inhibition. Cancer Cell
19, 701–714 (2011). This study shows that the overexpression of the mitotic checkpoint protein MAD2 is required for the CIN that results from the inhibition of the RB and p53 pathways, two pathways that are frequently inactivated in human cancer.
et al. Mad2 overexpression promotes aneuploidy and tumorigenesis in mice. Cancer Cell
11, 9–23 (2007).
Pavelka, N., Rancati, G. & Li, R.
Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: role of aneuploidy in cellular adaptation and cancer. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
22, 809–815 (2010).
et al. Aneuploidy underlies rapid adaptive evolution of yeast cells deprived of a conserved cytokinesis motor. Cell
135, 879–893 (2008). This work demonstrates the beneficial and synergistic effects of small changes in gene expression owing to aneuploidy in yeast with defects in cytokinesis.
Bianchi, A. B., Aldaz, C. M. & Conti, C. J.
Nonrandom duplication of the chromosome bearing a mutated Ha-ras-1 allele in mouse skin tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA
87, 6902–6906 (1990).
et al. Trisomy 7-harbouring non-random duplication of the mutant MET allele in hereditary papillary renal carcinomas. Nature Genet.
20, 66–69 (1998).
et al. Duplication and overexpression of the mutant allele of the MET proto-oncogene in multiple hereditary papillary renal cell tumours. Oncogene
17, 733–739 (1998).
et al. Trisomy 4 leading to duplication of a mutated KIT allele in acute myeloid leukemia with mast cell involvement. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet.
119, 26–31 (2000).
Langabeer, S. E., Beghini, A. & Larizza, L.
AML with t(8;21) and trisomy 4: possible involvement of c-kit?
17, 1915; author reply 1915–1916 (2003).
Sotillo, R., Schvartzman, J. M., Socci, N. D. & Benezra, R.
Mad2-induced chromosome instability leads to lung tumour relapse after oncogene withdrawal. Nature
464, 436–440 (2010). This study shows that KRAS-driven tumours that develop CIN and aneuploidy owing to transient MAD2 overexpression recur at a markedly elevated rate after the withdrawal of the KRAS oncogene.
Malinge, S., Izraeli, S. & Crispino, J. D.
Insights into the manifestations, outcomes and mechanisms of leukemogenesis in Down syndrome. Blood
113, 2619–2628 (2009).
Baek, K. H.
et al. Down's syndrome suppression of tumour growth and the role of the calcineurin inhibitor DSCR1. Nature
459, 1126–1130 (2009).
Ng, A. P.
et al. Trisomy of Erg is required for myeloproliferation in a mouse model of Down syndrome. Blood
115, 3966–3969 (2010).
Baetz, K., Measday, V. & Andrews, B.
Revealing hidden relationships among yeast genes involved in chromosome segregation using systematic synthetic lethal and synthetic dosage lethal screens. Cell Cycle
5, 592–595 (2006).
et al. Systematic yeast synthetic lethal and synthetic dosage lethal screens identify genes required for chromosome segregation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA
102, 13956–13961 (2005).
et al. Polyploids require Bik1 for kinetochore–microtubule attachment. J. Cell Biol.
155, 1173–1184 (2001).
Kramer, A., Maier, B. & Bartek, J.
Centrosome clustering and chromosomal (in) stability: A matter of life and death. Mol. Oncol.
5, 324–335 (2011).
et al. Mechanisms to suppress multipolar divisions in cancer cells with extra centrosomes. Genes Dev.
22, 2189–2203 (2008). In this study, a genome-wide siRNA screen was used to identify new mechanisms by which cells suppress multipolar divisions.
Tang, Y. C., Williams, B. R., Siegel, J. J. & Amon, A.
Identification of aneuploidy-selective antiproliferation compounds. Cell
144, 499–512 (2011). This study identifies drugs with aneuploidy-specific lethality.
Chng, W. J.
et al. Molecular dissection of hyperdiploid multiple myeloma by gene expression profiling. Cancer Res.
67, 2982–2989 (2007).
Mateos, M. V.
et al. Outcome according to cytogenetic abnormalities and DNA ploidy in myeloma patients receiving short induction with weekly bortezomib followed by maintenace. Blood
118, 4547–4553 (2011).
Usmani, S. Z., Bona, R. & Li, Z.
17 AAG for HSP90 inhibition in cancer—from bench to bedside. Curr. Mol. Med.
9, 654–664 (2009).
Taub, J. W. & Ge, Y.
Down syndrome, drug metabolism and chromosome 21. Pediatr. Blood Cancer
44, 33–39 (2005).
et al. Reduced folate carrier gene expression in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: relationship to immunophenotype and ploidy. Clin. Cancer Res.
4, 2169–2177 (1998).
Belkov, V. M.
et al. Reduced folate carrier expression in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a mechanism for ploidy but not lineage differences in methotrexate accumulation. Blood
93, 1643–1650 (1999).
Meaburn, K. J., Parris, C. N. & Bridger, J. M.
The manipulation of chromosomes by mankind: the uses of microcell-mediated chromosome transfer. Chromosoma
114, 263–274 (2005).
Doherty, A. M. & Fisher, E. M.
Microcell-mediated chromosome transfer (MMCT): small cells with huge potential. Mamm. Genome
14, 583–592 (2003).
Upender, M. B.
et al. Chromosome transfer induced aneuploidy results in complex dysregulation of the cellular transcriptome in immortalized and cancer cells. Cancer Res.
64, 6941–6949 (2004).
Hughes, T. R.
et al. Widespread aneuploidy revealed by DNA microarray expression profiling. Nature Genet.
25, 333–337 (2000).
Selmecki, A., Forche, A. & Berman, J.
Aneuploidy and isochromosome formation in drug-resistant Candida albicans. Science
313, 367–370 (2006). This study demonstrates that that the in vivo acquisition of extra copies of an isochromosome by Candida albicans confers resistance to fluconazole through the action of two specific genes in a copy-number-dependent manner.
Selmecki, A., Gerami-Nejad, M., Paulson, C., Forche, A. & Berman, J.
An isochromosome confers drug resistance in vivo by amplification of two genes, ERG11 and TAC1. Mol. Microbiol.
68, 624–641 (2008).
et al. How aneuploidy may cause cancer and genetic instability. Anticancer Res.
19, 4887–4906 (1999).
Duesberg, P., Li, R., Fabarius, A. & Hehlmann, R.
Aneuploidy and cancer: from correlation to causation. Contrib. Microbiol.
13, 16–44 (2006).
et al. Mechanism underlying the dual-mode regulation of microtubule dynamics by Kip/3kinesin-8. Mol. Cell
43, 751–763 (2011).
et al. Cytokinesis failure generating tetraploids promotes tumorigenesis in p53-null cells. Nature
437, 1043–1047 (2005).