Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

AFLP technology for DNA fingerprinting

This article has been updated

Abstract

The AFLP technique is a powerful DNA fingerprinting technology applicable to any organism without the need for prior sequence knowledge. The protocol involves the selective PCR amplification of restriction fragments of a total digest of genomic DNA, typically obtained with a mix of two restriction enzymes. Two limited sets of AFLP primers are sufficient to generate a large number of different primer combinations (PCs), each of which will yield unique fingerprints. Visualization of AFLP fingerprints after gel electrophoresis of AFLP products is described using either a conventional autoradiography platform or an automated LI-COR system. The AFLP technology has been used predominantly for assessing the degree of variability among plant cultivars, establishing linkage groups in crosses and saturating genomic regions with markers for gene landing efforts. AFLP fragments may also be used as physical markers to determine the overlap and positions of genomic clones and to integrate genetic and physical maps. Crucial characteristics of the AFLP technology are its robustness, reliability and quantitative nature. This latter feature has been exploited for co-dominant scoring of AFLP markers in sample collections such as F2 or back-cross populations using appropriate AFLP scoring software. This protocol can be completed in 2–3 d.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Outline of the AFLP procedure.
Figure 2: Schematic for adapter and primer design for the two rare cutters EcoRI and PstI and the frequent cutter MseI.
Figure 3: AFLP analysis of 32 tomato F2 segregants.
Figure 4: Gel image of an AFLP analysis of 56 Arabidopsis Recombinant Inbred Line (RIL) segregants analyzed using an EcoRI + AA/MseI + CAA primer combination.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 14 August 2008

    In the version of this article initially published, the three genotype classes in Figure 3b were incorrectly described in the legend. "A: homozygous as the first parent; H: heterozygous, B: homozygous as the second parent" should have read "A: homozygous absent; H: heterozygous; B:homozygous present". This error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

References

  1. Vos, P. et al. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 4407–4414 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Heun, M. et al. Site of einkorn wheat domestication identified by DNA fingerprinting. Science 278, 1312–1314 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Janssen, P. et al. Evaluation of the DNA fingerprinting method AFLP as an new tool in bacterial taxonomy. Microbiology 142, 1881–1893 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Roldan-Ruiz, I. et al. Estimating genetic conformity between related ryegrass (Lolium) varieties. 2. AFLP characterization. Mol. Breed. 6, 539–602 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vosman, B., Visser, D., van der Voort, J.R., Smulders, M.J. & van Eeuwijk, F. The establishment of 'essential derivation' among rose varieties, using AFLP. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 1718–1725 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hansen, M., Kraft, T., Ganestam, S., Sall, T. & Nilsson, N.O. Linkage disequilibrium mapping of the bolting gene in sea beet using AFLP markers. Genet. Res. 77, 61–66 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stich, B. et al. Comparison of linkage disequilibrium in elite European maize inbred lines using AFLP and SSR markers. Mol. Breed. 17, 217–226 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsuji, S. et al. An association study using AFLP markers and application to a beef cattle breeding population. Anim. Genet. 35, 40–43 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vuylsteke, M., Kuiper, M. & Stam, P. Chromosomal regions involved in hybrid performance and heterosis: their AFLP-based identification and practical use in prediction models. Heredity 85, 208–218 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vuylsteke, M. Genetic Analysis of Maize by Using the AFLP Method. Ph.D. thesis. Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands., ISBN 90-5808-044-7 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vuylsteke, M., Mank, R., Brugmans, B., Stam, P. & Kuiper, M. Further characterization of AFLP data as a tool in genetic diversity assessments among maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. Mol. Breed. 6, 265–276 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peters, S.A. et al. TOPAAS, a tomato and potato assembly assistance system for selection and finishing of bacterial artificial chromosomes. Plant Physiol. 140, 805–817 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Peters, J.L. et al. A physical amplified fragment-length polymorphism map of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 127, 1579–1589 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Srinivasan, J. et al. An integrated physical and genetic map of the nematode Pristionchus pacificus . Mol. Genet. Genomics 269, 715–722 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gorni, C. et al. Application of AFLP technology to radiation hybrid mapping. Chromosome Res. 12, 285–297 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Eijk, M.J., de Ruiter, M., Broekhof, J. & Peleman, J. Discovery and detection of polymorphic microsatellites by microsatellite-AFLP. Abstract presented at the Plant and Animal Genome IX Conference, January 13–17, 2001 (San Diego, CA), #P331, 143 (http://www.intl-pag.org/pag/9/abstracts/P3d_16.html).

  17. Van den Broeck, D. et al. Transposon display identifies individual transposable elements in high copy number lines. Plant J. 13, 121–129 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Piepho, H.P. & Koch, G. Codominant analysis of banding data from a dominant marker system by normal mixtures. Genetics 155, 1459–1468 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jansen, R.C., Geerlings, H., Van Oeveren, A.J. & Van Schaik, R.C. A comment on codominant scoring of AFLP markers. Genetics 158, 925–926 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Vuylsteke, M. et al. Two high-density AFLP (linkage maps of Zea mays L.: analysis of distribution of AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99, 921–935 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Menz, M.A. et al. Genetic diversity of public inbreds of sorghum determined by mapped AFLP and SSR markers. Crop Sci. 44, 1236–1244 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Herbergs, J., Siwek, M., Crooijmans, R.P., Van der Poel, J.J. & Groenen, M.A. Multicolour fluorescent detection and mapping of AFLP markers in chicken (Gallus domesticus). Anim. Genet. 30, 274–285 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ajmone-Marsan, P. et al. AFLP markers for DNA fingerprinting in cattle. Anim. Genet. 28, 418–426 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cameron, N.D., van Eijk, M.J., Brugmans, B. & Peleman, J. Discrimination between selected lines of pigs using AFLP markers. Heredity 91, 494–501 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Knorr, C., Cheng, H.H. & Dodgson, J.B. Application of AFLP markers to genome mapping in poultry. Anim. Genet. 30, 28–35 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Paxton, C.N., Pierpont, M.E. & Kooyman, D.L. Identification of AFLP markers associated with round heart syndrome in turkeys. Int. J. Poultry Sci. 4, 133–137 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. de Gruijter, J.M., Gasser, R.B., Polderman, A.M., Asigri, V. & Dijkshoorn, L. High resolution DNA fingerprinting by AFLP to study the genetic variation among Oesophagostomum bifurcum (Nematoda) from human and non-human primates from Ghana. Parasitology 130, 229–237 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Myburg, A.A., Remington, D.L., O'Malley, D.M., Sederoff, R.R. & Whetten, R.W. High-throughput AFLP analysis using infrared dye-labeled primers and an automated DNA sequencer. Biotechniques 30, 348–357 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Michelmore, R.W., Paran, I. & Kesseli, R.V. Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 9828–9832 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to H. Van den Daele and I. Vercauteren for their help with the manuscript. The AFLP technology is covered by patents and patent applications owned by Keygene N.V. AFLP and AFLP-QuantarPro are registered trademarks of Keygene N.V. All other product names, brand names or company names are used for identification purposes only and may be (registered) trademarks of their respective owners.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marnik Vuylsteke.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.J.T. van Ejik and J.D. Peleman are full-time employees of Keygene N.V.

M. Vuylsteke declares not to have competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vuylsteke, M., Peleman, J. & van Eijk, M. AFLP technology for DNA fingerprinting. Nat Protoc 2, 1387–1398 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.175

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.175

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing