Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Ultra-rapid axon-axon ephaptic inhibition of cerebellar Purkinje cells by the pinceau

Nature Neuroscience volume 17, pages 289–295 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Excitatory synaptic activity in the brain is shaped and balanced by inhibition. Because inhibition cannot propagate, it is often recruited with a synaptic delay by incoming excitation. Cerebellar Purkinje cells are driven by long-range excitatory parallel fiber inputs, which also recruit local inhibitory basket cells. The axon initial segment of each Purkinje cell is ensheathed by basket cell axons in a structure called the pinceau, which is largely devoid of chemical synapses. In mice, we found at the single-cell level that the pinceau mediates ephaptic inhibition of Purkinje cell firing at the site of spike initiation. The reduction of firing rate was synchronous with the presynaptic action potential, eliminating a synaptic delay and allowing granule cells to inhibit Purkinje cells without a preceding phase of excitation. Axon-axon ephaptic intercellular signaling can therefore mediate near-instantaneous feedforward and lateral inhibition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Nonsynaptic inhibition of the Purkinje cell.
Figure 2: Extracellular voltage field at the pinceau.
Figure 3: Two components of the pinceau field.
Figure 4: Pinceau model.
Figure 5: Extracellular voltage clamp.
Figure 6: Opposing direct excitation.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thach, W.T., Goodkin, H.P. & Keating, J.G. The cerebellum and the adaptive coordination of movement. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 403–442 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramón y Cajal, S. Histologie du Système Nerveux de l'homme et des Vertébrés (Maloine, 1911).

  3. Sotelo, C. & Llinás, R. Specialized membrane junctions between neurons in the vertebrate cerebellar cortex. J. Cell Biol. 53, 271–289 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bobik, M., Ellisman, M.H., Rudy, B. & Martone, M.E. Potassium channel subunit Kv3.2 and the water channel aquaporin-4 are selectively localized to cerebellar pinceau. Brain Res. 1026, 168–178 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Iwakura, A., Uchigashima, M., Miyazaki, T., Yamasaki, M. & Watanabe, M. Lack of molecular-anatomical evidence for GABAergic influence on axon initial segment of cerebellar Purkinje cells by the pinceau formation. J. Neurosci. 32, 9438–9448 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Furukawa, T. & Furshpan, E.J. Two inhibitory mechanisms in the Mauthner neurons of goldfish. J. Neurophysiol. 26, 140–176 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Furshpan, E.J. & Furukawa, T. Intracellular and extracellular responses of the serveral regions of the Mauthner cell of the goldfish. J. Neurophysiol. 25, 732–771 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Palay, S.L. The structural basis for neural action. in RNA and Brain Function, Memory and Learning: Proceedings of the Second Conference (ed. Brazier M.A.B.) (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1964).

  9. Fox, C.A., Hillman, D.E., Siegesmund, K.A. & Dutta, C.R. The primate cerebellar cortex: a Golgi and electron microscopic study. in Progress in Brain Research Vol. 25 (eds. Fox, C.A. & Snider, R.S.) 174–225 (Elsevier, 1967).

  10. Arvanitaki, A. Effects evoked in an axon by the activity of a contiguous one. J. Neurophysiol. 5, 89–108 (1942).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Anastassiou, C.A., Perin, R., Markram, H. & Koch, C. Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 217–223 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Su, C.Y., Menuz, K., Reisert, J. & Carlson, J.R. Non-synaptic inhibition between grouped neurons in an olfactory circuit. Nature 492, 66–71 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Korn, H. & Axelrad, H. Electrical inhibition of Purkinje cells in the cerebellum of the rat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 6244–6247 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Blot, A. & Barbour, B. Analysis of the study of the cerebellar pinceau by Korn and Axelrad. Preprint at http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2013/12/03/001123 (2013).

  15. Silver, I.A. & Erecińska, M. Intracellular and extracellular changes of [Ca2+] in hypoxia and ischemia in rat brain in vivo. J. Gen. Physiol. 95, 837–866 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pouzat, C. & Hestrin, S. Developmental regulation of basket/stellate cell→Purkinje cell synapses in the cerebellum. J. Neurosci. 17, 9104–9112 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. de Solages, C. et al. High-frequency organization and synchrony of activity in the Purkinje cell layer of the cerebellum. Neuron 58, 775–788 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Palay, S.L. & Chan-Palay, V. Cerebellar Cortex: Cytology and Organization (Springer, 1974).

  19. Palkovits, M., Magyar, P. & Szentágothai, J. Quantitative histological analysis of the cerebellar cortex in the cat. III. Structural organization of the molecular layer. Brain Res. 34, 1–18 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Buttermore, E.D. et al. Pinceau organization in the cerebellum requires distinct functions of neurofascin in Purkinje and basket neurons during postnatal development. J. Neurosci. 32, 4724–4742 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bishop, G.A. An analysis of HRP-filled basket cell axons in the cat's cerebellum. I. Morphometry and configuration. Anat. Embryol. (Berl.) 188, 287–297 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Foust, A., Popovic, M., Zecevic, D. & McCormick, D.A. Action potentials initiate in the axon initial segment and propagate through axon collaterals reliably in cerebellar Purkinje neurons. J. Neurosci. 30, 6891–6902 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Faber, D.S. & Korn, H. A neuronal inhibition mediated electrically. Science 179, 577–578 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Korn, H. & Faber, D.S. Vertebrate central nervous system: same neurons mediate both electrical and chemical inhibitions. Science 194, 1166–1169 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rhodes, K.J. et al. Association and colocalization of the Kvbeta1 and Kvbeta2 beta-subunits with Kv1 alpha-subunits in mammalian brain K+ channel complexes. J. Neurosci. 17, 8246–8258 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Laube, G. et al. Ultrastructural localization of Shaker-related potassium channel subunits and synapse-associated protein 90 to septate-like junctions in rat cerebellar Pinceaux. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 42, 51–61 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rhodes, K.J. et al. Voltage-gated K+ channel beta subunits: expression and distribution of Kv beta 1 and Kv beta 2 in adult rat brain. J. Neurosci. 16, 4846–4860 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Southan, A.P. & Robertson, B. Electrophysiological characterization of voltage-gated K(+) currents in cerebellar basket and Purkinje cells: Kv1 and Kv3 channel subfamilies are present in basket cell nerve terminals. J. Neurosci. 20, 114–122 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Southan, A.P. & Robertson, B. Patch-clamp recordings from cerebellar basket cell bodies and their presynaptic terminals reveal an asymmetric distribution of voltage-gated potassium channels. J. Neurosci. 18, 948–955 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Harvey, A.L. Twenty years of dendrotoxins. Toxicon 39, 15–26 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Brigant, J.L. & Mallart, A. Presynaptic currents in mouse motor endings. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 333, 619–636 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Roth, A. & Häusser, M. Compartmental models of rat cerebellar Purkinje cells based on simultaneous somatic and dendritic patch-clamp recordings. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 535, 445–472 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lorincz, A. & Nusser, Z. Cell type–dependent molecular composition of the axon initial segment. J. Neurosci. 28, 14329–14340 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jaeger, D. No parallel fiber volleys in the cerebellar cortex: evidence from cross-correlation analysis between Purkinje cells in a computer model and in recordings from anesthetized rats. J. Comput. Neurosci. 14, 311–327 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ostojic, S., Brunel, N. & Hakim, V. How connectivity, background activity and synaptic properties shape the cross-correlation between spike trains. J. Neurosci. 29, 10234–10253 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Eccles, J.C., Ito, M. & Szentágothai, J. The Cerebellum as a Neuronal Machine (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1967).

  37. Mann-Metzer, P. & Yarom, Y. Electrotonic coupling synchronizes interneuron activity in the cerebellar cortex. Prog. Brain Res. 124, 115–122 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mann-Metzer, P. & Yarom, Y. Electrotonic coupling interacts with intrinsic properties to generate synchronized activity in cerebellar networks of inhibitory interneurons. J. Neurosci. 19, 3298–3306 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Brunel, N. & Hakim, V. Fast global oscillations in networks of integrate-and-fire neurons with low firing rates. Neural Comput. 11, 1621–1671 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kondo, S. & Marty, A. Synaptic currents at individual connections among stellate cells in rat cerebellar slices. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 509, 221–232 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Person, A.L. & Raman, I.M. Purkinje neuron synchrony elicits time-locked spiking in the cerebellar nuclei. Nature 481, 502–505 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Jörntell, H. & Ekerot, C.F. Reciprocal bidirectional plasticity of parallel fiber receptive fields in cerebellar Purkinje cells and their afferent interneurons. Neuron 34, 797–806 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mittmann, W. & Häusser, M. Linking synaptic plasticity and spike output at excitatory and inhibitory synapses onto cerebellar Purkinje cells. J. Neurosci. 27, 5559–5570 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Chadderton, P., Margrie, T.W. & Häusser, M. Integration of quanta in cerebellar granule cells during sensory processing. Nature 428, 856–860 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Jörntell, H. & Ekerot, C.F. Properties of somatosensory synaptic integration in cerebellar granule cells in vivo. J. Neurosci. 26, 11786–11797 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ito, M., Yoshida, M., Obata, K., Kawai, N. & Udo, M. Inhibitory control of intracerebellar nuclei by the purkinje cell axons. Exp. Brain Res. 10, 64–80 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Isope, P. & Barbour, B. Properties of unitary granule cellPurkinje cell synapses in adult rat cerebellar slices. J. Neurosci. 22, 9668–9678 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Brunel, N., Hakim, V., Isope, P., Nadal, J.P. & Barbour, B. Optimal information storage and the distribution of synaptic weights: perceptron versus Purkinje cell. Neuron 43, 745–757 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Barbour, B., Brunel, N., Hakim, V. & Nadal, J.P. What can we learn from synaptic weight distributions? Trends Neurosci. 30, 622–629 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Howard, A., Tamas, G. & Soltesz, I. Lighting the chandelier: new vistas for axo-axonic cells. Trends Neurosci. 28, 310–316 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Dugué, G.P. et al. Electrical coupling mediates tunable low-frequency oscillations and resonance in the cerebellar Golgi cell network. Neuron 61, 126–139 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Edelstein, A., Amodaj, N., Hoover, K., Vale, R. & Stuurman, N. Computer Control of Microscopes Using μManager (John Wiley and Sons, 2010).

  53. Abramoff, M.D., Magelhaes, P.J. & Ram, S.J. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics Int. 11, 36–42 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jones, E., Oliphant, T. & Peterson, P. et al. SciPy: open source scientific tools for Python. http://www.scipy.org/ (2001).

  55. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2011).

  56. Llano, I., Marty, A., Armstrong, C.M. & Konnerth, A. Synaptic- and agonist-induced excitatory currents of Purkinje cells in rat cerebellar slices. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 434, 183–213 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Okada, Y.C., Huang, J.C., Rice, M.E., Tranchina, D. & Nicholson, C. Origin of the apparent tissue conductivity in the molecular and granular layers of the in vitro turtle cerebellum and the interpretation of current source-density analysis. J. Neurophysiol. 72, 742–753 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Hodgkin, A.L. & Huxley, A.F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 117, 500–544 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Huguenard, J.R. & McCormick, D.A. Simulation of the currents involved in rhythmic oscillations in thalamic relay neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 68, 1373–1383 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Attwell, M. Beato, N. Brunel, M. Casado, M. Diana, D. DiGregorio, N. Emptage, P. Faure, A. Feltz, V. Hakim, C. Léna, T. Margie, E. Schwartz, C. Sotelo, S. Supplisson and M. Wassef, as well as members of the Barbour laboratory and the IBENS Neuroscience Section, for helpful discussions and/or critical comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-08-SYSC-005, ANR-08-BLAN-0023) and the Ecole Normale Supérieure (fellowship to A.B.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ecole Normale Supérieure, IBENS, Paris, France

    Antonin Blot & Boris Barbour

  2. CNRS, UMR 8197, Paris, France

    Antonin Blot & Boris Barbour

  3. INSERM, U1024, Paris, France

    Antonin Blot & Boris Barbour

Authors
  1. Antonin Blot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Boris Barbour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.B. performed all of the experiments and analyses. B.B. designed and built the custom electronics. Both authors designed the experiments and analyses, interpreted the results, developed the model, and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Barbour.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 The pinceau.

(a), Diagram of Purkinje cells, basket cells and granule cells in the cerebellar cortex. (b), Organisation of the basket and pinceau. BC, basket cell; GC, granule cell; GCL, granule cell layer; ML, molecular layer; PF, parallel fibre; PC, Purkinje cell; PCL, Purkinje cell layer.

Supplementary Figure 2 Small effect of an action potential in the basket.

The Purkinje cell soma is surrounded by the axons of basket cells (diagram in Supplementary Fig. 1a). The propagation of the action potential of the interneurone in this perisomatic basket could itself affect the somatic voltage of Purkinje cell and thus its firing, though the control cells in Fig. 1i,k,m,o suggest this action is weak, if present. To gain insight into this possible mechanism, we modelled changes of extracellular voltage at the soma (black) by changing VSE and compared the result to the effects of the pinceau already modelled (orange) and of action potentials in both compartments (green). Spike propagation in the basket can be active, because an extracellular negativity could be observed there (Fig. 2c, traces 9 and 10). To estimate an upper limit on the contribution of an action potential in the basket we set VSE to twice the recorded trace with the maximal negativity (Fig. 2c trace 7), thus assuming a spatially uniform negativity of −70 μV around the soma. (both the amplitude and uniformity of this signal cause overestimation of its effect). This change of extracellular potential capacitivelyhyperpolarises the Purkinje cell soma (b) by 20 μV. The somatic transmembrane potential is depolarised (c). The intracellular hyperpolarisation propagates to the axon (d) with very little decrement. These changes do not affect the intra-pinceau potential (e), producing a net transmembranehyperpolarisation of the Purkinje cell axon (f). However, even in this overestimate, the hyperpolarisation caused in the Purkinje cell axon by the basket is small compared to the pinceau effect and the firing of the Purkinje cell is only weakly modulated (g). The basket-induced signals described above would render impossible the intracellular detection of the pinceau signal, which we showed in Fig. 4 would in any case be undetectably small. The only method able to demonstrate the pinceau effect on the Purkinje cell is therefore measurement of its effect on firing.

Supplementary Figure 3 Detection method.

The extracellular field induced by the spikes of basket cells was computed by averaging recording periods (triggered on basket cell action potentials) that were devoid of Purkinje cell spikes (a), (c) (blue). We subtracted from this first trace an average of periods with no spike in either the Purkinje cell or the Basket cell (b), (c) (green). The resulting field (c) (yellow) was subtracted from every trace (d) and Purkinje cell spikes were then detected using a simple threshold (d) (red) on these snippets (± 20 ms around each basket cell spike) after baseline subtraction by a 5 ms high-pass box filter.

Supplementary Figure 4 Average spike waveform of Purkinje cell.

(a) Average spike of the Purkinje cell in Supplementary Fig. 3. (b) Expanded view of the dashed box in a. Purkinje cell spikes are followed by a long-lasting overshoot. The repetitive firing of the Purkinje (at 70 Hz) explains the slope preceding the spike. Average of 137,672 spikes.

Supplementary Figure 5 Sensitivity analysis of the model.

Effects of varying the principal parameters of the model (Fig. 4) on the membrane potential of the Purkinje cell axon (VPA – VP). Changes of (a): RI, (b): CBA, (c): GK, (d): RL, (e): CPA, (f): RAS. Colour map: multiplicative change of the value indicated in each panel and used in the paper (green curves). Scale bar: 50 μV, 1 ms.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–5 (PDF 1510 kb)

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blot, A., Barbour, B. Ultra-rapid axon-axon ephaptic inhibition of cerebellar Purkinje cells by the pinceau. Nat Neurosci 17, 289–295 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3624

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3624

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing