Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Expressing fear enhances sensory acquisition

Abstract

It has been proposed that facial expression production originates in sensory regulation. Here we demonstrate that facial expressions of fear are configured to enhance sensory acquisition. A statistical model of expression appearance revealed that fear and disgust expressions have opposite shape and surface reflectance features. We hypothesized that this reflects a fundamental antagonism serving to augment versus diminish sensory exposure. In keeping with this hypothesis, when subjects posed expressions of fear, they had a subjectively larger visual field, faster eye movements during target localization and an increase in nasal volume and air velocity during inspiration. The opposite pattern was found for disgust. Fear may therefore work to enhance perception, whereas disgust dampens it. These convergent results provide support for the Darwinian hypothesis that facial expressions are not arbitrary configurations for social communication, but rather, expressions may have originated in altering the sensory interface with the physical world.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Fear, disgust and their associated antiprototypes defined in a multidimensional face space.
Figure 2: Opposition in facial actions between fear and disgust expressions.
Figure 3: Subjective visual-field changes for participants posing fear and disgust expressions.
Figure 4: Saccadic eye movements for participants posing fear, disgust and neutral expressions.
Figure 5: Measurement of nasal inspiratory capacity during expressions of disgust and fear.
Figure 6: Effects of fear and disgust expressions on internal nasal anatomy.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fridlund, A.J. Human Facial Expression: An Evolutionary View (Academic Press, San Diego, California, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Izard, C.E. Human Emotions (Plenum, New York, 1977).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Ekman, P. Darwin and Facial Expression: A Century of Research in Review (Academic Press, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 17, 124–129 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hess, U., Blairy, S. & Kleck, R.E. The influence of facial emotion displays, gender, and ethnicity on judgments of dominance and affiliation. J. Nonverbal Behav. 24, 265–283 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Marsh, A.A., Ambady, N. & Kleck, R.E. The effects of fear and anger facial expressions on approach- and avoidance-related behaviors. Emotion 5, 119–124 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ekman, P. Basic emotions. in The Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (ed. Dalgleish, T. & Power, T.) 45–60 (John Wiley & Sons, Sussex, UK, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Izard, C.E. Innate and universal facial expressions: evidence from developmental and cross-cultural research. Psychol. Bull. 115, 288–299 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Adolphs, R. Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: psychological and neurological mechanisms. Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 1, 21–62 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gallese, V. Before and below 'theory of mind': embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 362, 659–669 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. James, W. What is an emotion? Mind 9, 188–205 (1884).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Strack, F., Martin, L.L. & Stepper, S. Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54, 768–777 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Singer, T. The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: review of literature and implications for future research. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 30, 855–863 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Frijda, N.H. The Emotions (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Darwin, C. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals (Oxford University Press, New York, 1872/1998).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Pieper, A. Cerebral Function in Infancy and Childhood (Consultants Bureau, New York, 1963).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Piderit, T. Mimik und Physiognomik (Detmold, Klingenberg, Germany, 1867).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gratiolet, P. De la Physionomie et des Mouvements d'Expression (Hetzel, Paris, 1865).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Davis, M. & Whalen, P.J. The amygdala: vigilance and emotion. Mol. Psychiatry 6, 13–34 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Whalen, P.J. et al. Masked presentations of emotional facial expressions modulate amygdala activity without explicit knowledge. J. Neurosci. 18, 411–418 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson, A.K., Christoff, K., Panitz, D., De Rosa, E. & Gabrieli, J.D. Neural correlates of the automatic processing of threat facial signals. J. Neurosci. 23, 5627–5633 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Phelps, E.A., Ling, S. & Carrasco, M. Emotion facilitates perception and potentiates the perceptual benefits of attention. Psychol. Sci. 17, 292–299 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pourtois, G., Thut, G., Grave de Peralta, R., Michel, C. & Vuilleumier, P. Two electrophysiological stages of spatial orienting towards fearful faces: early tempero-parietal activation preceding gain control in extrastriate visual cortex. Neuroimage 26, 149–163 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vuilleumier, P., Richardson, M.P., Armony, J.L., Driver, J. & Dolan, R.J. Distant influences of amygdala lesion on visual cortical activation during emotional face processing. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 1271–1278 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rozin, P. & Fallon, A.E. A perspective on disgust. Psychol. Rev. 94, 23–41 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dailey, M.N., Cottrell, G.W., Padgett, C. & Adolphs, R. EMPATH: a neural network that categorizes facial expressions. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14, 1158–1173 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Susskind, J.M., Littlewort, G., Bartlett, M.S., Movellan, J. & Anderson, A.K. Human and computer recognition of facial expressions of emotion. Neuropsychologia 45, 152–162 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Scherer, K. Appraisal considered as a process of multi-level sequential checking. in Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research (eds. Scherer, K.R., Schorr, A. & Johnstone, T.) 92–120 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Matsumoto, D. & Ekman, P. Japanese and Caucasian facial expressions of emotion (JACFEE) [Slides]. (Intercultural and Emotion Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cootes, T., Edwards, G. & Taylor, C. Active appearance models. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 23, 681–685 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Leopold, D.A., O'Toole, A.J., Vetter, T. & Blanz, V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 89–94 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Adolphs, R. et al. A mechanism for impaired fear recognition after amygdala damage. Nature 433, 68–72 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Whalen, P.J. et al. Human amygdala responsivity to masked fearful eye whites. Science 306, 2061 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ruch, T.C. & Fulton, J.F. Medical Physiology and Biophysics (W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ekman, P. An argument for basic emotions. Cogn. Emot. 6, 169–200 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zelano, C. & Sobel, N. Humans as an animal model for systems-level organization of olfaction. Neuron 48, 431–454 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zajonc, R.B. Emotion and facial efference: a theory reclaimed. Science 228, 15–21 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Saussure, F.d. Course in General Linguistics (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Scherer, K.R. & Wallbott, H.G. Evidence for universality and cultural variation of differential emotion response patterning. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 66, 310–328 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. The expressive behavior of the deaf-and-blind-born. in Social Communication and Movement (eds. von Cranach, M. & Vine, I.) 163–193 (Academic Press, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Galati, D., Scherer, K.R. & Ricci-Bitti, P.E. Voluntary facial expression of emotion: comparing congenitally blind with normally sighted encoders. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73, 1363–1379 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Andrew, R.J. Evolution of facial expression. Science 142, 1034–1041 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Marsh, A.A., Elfenbein, H.A. & Ambady, N. Nonverbal “accents”: cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. Psychol. Sci. 14, 373–376 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Marsh, A.A., Adams, R.B. Jr. & Kleck, R.E. Why do fear and anger look the way they do? Form and social function in facial expressions. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 31, 73–86 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Tracy, J.L . & Robbins, R.W . Show your pride: evidence for a discrete emotion expression. Psychol. Sci. 15, 194–197 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. The past explains the present: emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethol. Sociobiol. 11, 375–424 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Boiten, F. Autonomic response patterns during voluntary facial action. Psychophysiology 33, 123–131 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Pratt for comments on the eye-tracking data, F. Tam for technical assistance acquiring structural MRI scans and N. Sobel for comments on a prior draft. This work was supported by the Canada Research Chairs program and a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council grant to A.K.A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.M.S. and A.K.A. contributed equally to this work. J.M.S. created and analyzed the facial appearance model and associated behavioral data. J.M.S. and A.K.A. collected and analyzed the structural MRI data. A.C. and W.G. collected and analyzed the respiration and visual-field data and wrote parts of the corresponding Methods sections. D.H.L. and R.F. collected and analyzed the objective perimetry data, and J.M.S. and R.F. collected and analyzedthe eye-tracking data. J.M.S. and A.K.A. created the figures and wrote the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Joshua M Susskind or Adam K Anderson.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Methods (PDF 105 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Susskind, J., Lee, D., Cusi, A. et al. Expressing fear enhances sensory acquisition. Nat Neurosci 11, 843–850 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2138

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2138

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing