This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Roberts WW et al. (2005) Pathological stage does not alter the prognosis for renal lesions determined to be stage T1 by computerized tomography. J Urol 173: 713–715
Gilbert SM et al. (2006) Reevaluation of TNM staging of renal cortical tumors: recurrence and survival for T1N0M0 and T3aN0M0 tumors are equivalent. Urology 68: 287–291
Bonsib SM (2004) The renal sinus is the principal invasive pathway: a prospective study of 100 renal cell carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 28: 1594–1600
Thompson RH et al. (2005) Is renal sinus fat invasion the same as perinephric fat invasion for pT3a renal cell carcinoma? J Urol 174: 1218–1221
Sorbellini M et al. (2005) A postoperative prognostic nomogram predicting recurrence for patients with conventional clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 173: 48–51
Acknowledgements
The synopsis was written by Rachel Murphy, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wagner, K., Jarrett, T. What is the prognostic value of the pT3a tumor classification for renal cell carcinoma?. Nat Rev Urol 4, 540–541 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0912
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0912