This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Zisman A et al. (2001) Improved prognostication of renal cell carcinoma using an integrated staging system. J Clin Oncol 19: 1649–1657
Frank I et al. (2002) An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score. J Urol 168: 2395–2400
Han KR et al. (2003) TNM T3a renal cell carcinoma: adrenal gland involvement is not the same as renal fat invasion. J Urol 169: 899–903
Siemer S et al. (2005) Current TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma evaluated: revising stage T3a. J Urol 173: 33–37
Acknowledgements
The synopsis was written by Sandra Michelmore, Asssociate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Glossary
- FUHRMAN NUCLEAR GRADE
-
Nuclear grading system ranging from I (best prognosis) to IV (worst prognosis)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Uzzo, R. Does pathological stage affect the prognosis for patients with clinically staged T1 renal cell carcinoma?. Nat Rev Urol 2, 212–213 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0182
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0182