Osteoclasts control reactivation of dormant myeloma cells by remodelling the endosteal niche

Abstract

Multiple myeloma is largely incurable, despite development of therapies that target myeloma cell-intrinsic pathways. Disease relapse is thought to originate from dormant myeloma cells, localized in specialized niches, which resist therapy and repopulate the tumour. However, little is known about the niche, and how it exerts cell-extrinsic control over myeloma cell dormancy and reactivation. In this study, we track individual myeloma cells by intravital imaging as they colonize the endosteal niche, enter a dormant state and subsequently become activated to form colonies. We demonstrate that dormancy is a reversible state that is switched ‘on’ by engagement with bone-lining cells or osteoblasts, and switched ‘off’ by osteoclasts remodelling the endosteal niche. Dormant myeloma cells are resistant to chemotherapy that targets dividing cells. The demonstration that the endosteal niche is pivotal in controlling myeloma cell dormancy highlights the potential for targeting cell-extrinsic mechanisms to overcome cell-intrinsic drug resistance and prevent disease relapse.

Introduction

Cancer cell dormancy is a poorly understood and often neglected stage in the evolution of many cancers, where extrinsic signals from the tumour microenvironment suppress active growth and proliferation, until more favourable conditions arise1,2. This is a major clinical problem, as dormant cancer cells may disseminate at an early stage in the disease3, become resistant to conventional therapies that target dividing cells1 and persist as minimal residual disease (MRD), which can be reactivated to promote disease relapse long after treatment cessation4. In the skeleton, dormant cells may co-exist in equilibrium with the bone microenvironment for years before reactivation and clinical relapse. In this regard, multiple myeloma, a primary haematological malignancy arising in bone, exemplifies the major therapeutic challenges posed by cancer cell dormancy. While novel therapies that selectively target cell ‘intrinsic’ cancer properties have improved survival5, patients continue to relapse and myeloma remains largely incurable. Hence, understanding the ‘extrinsic’ environmental factors that regulate myeloma cell dormancy is required to deliver complementary treatment strategies to overcome drug resistance and achieve complete remission and cure.

Recently, whole-genome sequencing has identified key driver mutations and complex mutation patterns during the natural history of myeloma within individual patients6. These longitudinal analyses have revealed marked intra-clonal heterogeneity and shifting clonal dominance during disease progression and in response to drug treatments7,8,9. The ‘waxing and waning’ of different myeloma clones (clonal tides) suggests that cancer cell growth and proliferation are not fixed genetic programmes8,9 that follow a linear model, but rather a branching and parallel, ‘Darwinian’, model of clonal evolution that is subject to external selective pressures6,10. These data suggest that myeloma cell clones are able to reversibly switch ‘on’ or ‘off’ depending on the presence of favourable or unfavourable environmental signals. A critical component of this tumour microenvironment is the bone niche where myeloma cells initially colonize and are believed to reside11. However, the nature of this niche and mechanisms that control myeloma cell occupancy are poorly defined.

Haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) have long been known to occupy unique niches within the bone marrow microenvironment and this controls HSC dormancy, self-renewal and mobilization. These specialized microenvironments contain cells of the osteogenic lineage, perivascular cells and/or endothelial cells, and remodelling of these niches by osteoclasts regulates niche occupancy12,13,14,15,16,17,18. More recently, leukaemic cells and other cancer cells, including prostate cancer cells, have been shown to engraft in the HSC niche19,20,21. However, despite the importance of the niche in controlling tumour cell engraftment, the dynamic interactions between colonizing cancer cells and components of these specialized niches, and the impact of these interactions on the long-term fate of these cells, is poorly understood.

Studying the dynamic interactions between dormant myeloma cells and the bone niche is particularly challenging, because it requires high-resolution deep-tissue imaging through intact bone in a live animal. Nevertheless, intravital microscopy of the bone marrow space beneath the bregma in the calvarium22 has been successfully used to study haematopoiesis23 and the HSC niche24,25,26,27, and has recently been applied to study the colonization of bone by leukaemic and myeloma cells20,28. However, to date, non-destructive microscopic imaging over periods of weeks to months is yet to be performed to longitudinally track the fate of the same individual myeloma cells as they become activated and escape dormancy. This would be a significant advance on longitudinal imaging by bioluminescence, which lacks the image resolution and potential for simultaneous visualization of the cells and structures that make up the bone niche. Furthermore, it would have distinct advantages over cross-sectional intravital microscopy, which may not capture the heterogeneity within and between different animals. Nevertheless, to image dormant myeloma cells in vivo, a robust method is required to discriminate resting from actively dividing cancer cells. Intravital dyes such as carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester, which label intracellular proteins, have relatively short half-lives and are unsuitable for the study of long-term cancer cell dormancy. Fluorescent stem cell markers have been used to track HSCs and study the epithelial stem cell niche, but these reporters may lack specificity when used in isolation29,30,31,32.

To address this, here we have developed a method for dynamic longitudinal imaging of dormant myeloma cells within intact long bones of mice using intravital two-photon microscopy. Myeloma cells are double-labelled with both fixed genetic reporters and lipophilic membrane dyes, which are retained by non-dividing myeloma cells. Intravital microscopy is used to resolve single tumour cells as they arrive in bone and engage in the bone niche, to track the transition from dormancy to active growth, and to follow the serial growth of tumour colonies by repeated imaging of the same mouse at weekly intervals. These studies show that myeloma cells can be held in a dormant state by osteoblast-like cells in the endosteal niche, and this state confers dormant cells with drug resistance. Furthermore, direct activation of osteoclasts can remodel the endosteal surface to release dormant myeloma cells from the niche and stochastically facilitate their reactivation to repopulate the tumour. Thus, myeloma cell dormancy is a reversible state controlled by the extrinsic bone microenvironment, which can be manipulated to change the course of the disease.

Results

Colonizing myeloma cells engage in the endosteal niche

C57BL/KaLwRijHsd mice were injected with syngeneic 5TGM1-enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) murine myeloma cells and GFP+ cells arriving in the intact tibia were visualized in real time by intravital two-photon microscopy (Fig. 1a–c; Supplementary Movie 1). Rare colonizing myeloma cells were observed as they migrated from the marrow space towards endocortical bone surfaces, where they arrested (Fig. 1a–c). Histological analysis confirmed the presence of individual CD138+ cells adjacent to endosteal bone surfaces 1 and 3 days after tumour cell inoculation (Fig. 1d). The majority of myeloma cells continued to circulate through the bone marrow, where they were only briefly captured in the imaging volume as they flowed through in blood vessels (Fig. 1a–c; Supplementary Movie 2). These circulating cells were seen throughout the duration of the imaging period (>60 min), although the absolute numbers were likely underestimated, as images were captured at 30-s intervals (Fig. 1c). Nevertheless, real-time intravital imaging demonstrated that individual cancer cells directly seed the endosteal bone niche in the tibia.

Figure 1: Intravital two-photon microscopy of cancer cells colonizing bone.
figure1

(a) Still-frames capturing the arrival of a circulating tumour cell (top panels) and colonizing tumour cell (bottom panels) in real time. Blue, bone; red, vasculature; green, 5TGM1-GFP myeloma cells. Scale bars, 50 μm. It corresponds to Supplementary Movies 1 and 2. (b) Still-frames of the same cells in a showing egress of circulating cell from bone after 2 min and retention of a colonizing cell >1 h in the bone. Blue, bone; red, vasculature; green, 5TGM1-GFP myeloma cells. Scale bars, 20 μm. (c) Proportion of cells that circulated through or colonized the bone marrow in each experiment and total of all experiments. (d) CD138-stained sections from naive, or cell-injected mice at 1 and 3 days post injection. Single CD138+ cells (brown, black arrows), haematoxylin counterstain. Scale bars, 20 μm. Data represent at least three experiments.

Visualization of subpopulations of myeloma cells in vivo

To investigate the heterogeneity in cell growth and proliferation within populations of myeloma cells, we labelled 5TGM1-eGFP cells with 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindodicarbocyanine (DiD) (Fig. 2a). In vitro cultures of double-labelled cells showed a serial dilution of the dye mean fluorescence intensity as GFP+DiDhi cells divided and shared the label among daughter cells, which progressively became GFP+DiDlo and finally GFP+DiDneg (Fig. 2b,c). Next, mice were injected with double-labelled (GFP+DiDhi) cells, and the tibia was analysed by two-photon microscopy and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. Initially, only GFP+DiDhi cells were present (Fig. 3a,b); however, as cells engrafted and divided, the expansion of GFP+ cells was associated with a dilution of the DiD label (Fig. 3a,b). At later time points when myeloma burden was high, GFP+DiDhi cells, which had retained the label, and therefore had not divided, were still detectable (Fig. 3a,b). Interestingly, the proportion of GFP+DiDhi cells appeared higher at day 7 and subsequent days, when compared with earlier time points (Fig. 3b), suggesting that labelled cells can recirculate for several days before eventually colonizing the bone marrow. Two-photon imaging of the entire explanted tibia detected non-divided GFP+DiD+ cells at all time points, even among developing GFP+DiDneg tumours (Fig. 3c,d; Supplementary Fig. 1; Supplementary Movie 3). Furthermore, the numbers of GFP+DiD+ cells did not change with time, confirming the long-term persistence of these cells (Fig. 3d). DiD labelling was also seen in GFPneg endogenous cells (Fig. 3e,f), which likely reflects membrane transfer33, and shows the importance of using a double-labelling approach with a fixed genetic reporter, such as GFP, to unequivocally identify engrafted tumour cells. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that >70% of the GFPDiD+ cells were Gr-1+ and/or CD11b+ myeloid cells. The GFP+DiDhi population contained only 3.26% Gr-1+ and 3.26% CD11b+ expressing cells (Fig. 3g–i). Thus, the GFP+DiDhi population was highly enriched for GFP+DiDhi cells and contained <7% contaminating Gr-1+ and/or CD11b+ cells. Furthermore, 89% of dormant GFP+DiDhi and 96% of the GFP+DiDneg cells were CD138+, with no difference in intensity between the two populations. Less than 2% of the GFPnegDiD+ population were CD138+ and fewer than 6% were B220+ (Fig. 3g,i). B220 was not expressed on GFP+DiDhi or GFP+DiDneg cells (Fig. 3g,i). Consistent with this, sorted GFP+DiDhi cells expressed genes typical of plasma cells, but not naive B cells or myeloid cells (Fig. 3j).

Figure 2: Labelling and tracking dormant cancer cells in vitro.
figure2

(a) Schematic of DiD labelling to identify non-dividing cells. (b) FACS analysis of the DiD level over 21 days of in vitro culture showing percentage of DiDhi and DiDneg cells (left, middle panel) and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the DiD level (mean±s.e.m., one-way ANOVA). (c) Fluorescent microscopy (top panels) and FACS analysis (bottom panels) of cultured DiD-labelled cells. Numbers indicate percentages of GFP+ cells in the gates. Scale bar, 150 μm.

Figure 3: Labelling and tracking dormant myeloma cells in vivo.
figure3

(a) FACS analysis of bone marrow (BM) cells after inoculation of GFP+DiD-labelled 5TGM1-eGFP cells. Numbers indicate percentages in the gates. (b) Percentage of total BM of GFP+DiDhi dormant cells and GFP+DiDneg cells by FACS analysis from a (individual data points and mean±s.e.m., one-way ANOVA). (c) Two-photon images of the metaphyseal region of explanted tibias harvested at days 3 and 21. White, bone; red, GFP+DiD+ cells (white arrows); green, GFP+DiDneg cells. Scale bars, 200 μm. (d) Enumeration of GFP+DiD+ cells (mean+s.e.m.). Data represent 4–5 individual mice. (e) FACS plots of BM samples from naive (no cells), mice injected with GFP cells not labelled with DiD (GFP+DiDneg) or injected with DiD-labelled GFP+ cells (GFP+DiD+), % of BM cells presented. (f) FACS plot demonstrating the three populations of cells examined in gi. (g) Histograms showing the frequency of cells that are CD11b+, Gr-1+, CD138+ or B220+ for each cell population from f. (h) FACS plots showing distribution of CD11b and Gr-1-expressing cells in each GFP/DiD population from f. (i) Table showing the % of cells (mean+s.e.m.) that are CD11b+, Gr-1+, CD138+ or B220+ for each cell population from f. (j) Transcript profile of GFP+DiDhi and GFP+DiDneg cells showing the expression level of plasma cell, naive B-cell and myeloid lineage genes.

A subpopulation of myeloma cells is dormant in vivo

The long-term retention of DiD in a population of cells suggested that these cells were dormant, whereas those that had lost DiD had undergone membrane dye dilution due to cell proliferation. Significantly more GFP+DiDhi cells than GFP+DiDneg cells were detected in the G0 phase of the cell cycle, as determined by Ki67 and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining (P<0.001—paired t-test; Fig. 4a,b), while significantly less GFP+DiDhi cells were in G1, S and G2/M phases (P<0.001, P<0.001 and P<0.05 paired t-test, respectively, Fig. 4a,b). FACS sorting and transcriptional profiling of GFP+DiDhi and GFP+DiDneg cells from disease-bearing mice revealed two distinct transcriptional profiles with 6,262 differentially expressed genes between the two activation states (Fig. 4c–e). Genes involved in cell cycle and cell replication were downregulated in the GFP+DiDhi population when compared with the GFP+DiDneg population (Fig. 4f; Supplementary Table 1). Furthermore, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)34 identified gene sets inversely related to cell cycle, and quiescent versus proliferating HSC signatures (Fig. 4g). Thus, FACS analysis and molecular profiling identified GFP+DiDhi cells as a dormant population that has undergone limited numbers of cell divisions as a result of the downregulation of genes that control cell cycle.

Figure 4: Confirmation of GFP+DiDhi cell population as dormant myeloma cells.
figure4

(a) FACS plot showing gating of GFP+ DiDhi and GFP+ DiDneg cells in G0, G1, S and G2/M cell cycle phases as determined by Ki67 expression and DAPI staining on day 21. FACS plot shown is pooled data from five mice. (b) Distribution of DiDhi and DiDneg cells in G0, G1, S and G2/M phase of the cell cycle from gating shown in a. Data represent 4–5 individual mice (mean±s.e.m., paired t-test). (c) Gates used for FACS sorting of GFP+DiDhi and GFP+DiDneg cells. (d) Heatmap showing differentially expressed genes. (e) Table of differentially transcribed genes between the three cell populations. (f) Gene expression analysis showing genes involved in cell cycle and replication, transcriptional and translational activity, which were expressed at lower levels in dormant cells when compared with GFP+DiDneg cells isolated from the same mice. (g) Selected regulatory gene sets determined by GSEA, including negative enrichment for gene sets related to cell cycle progression and regulation of HSC quiescence in DiDhi vs DiDneg cells. Dot plots represent concatenated myeloma populations from six tumour-bearing mice.

Importantly, gene expression analysis revealed that the dormant GFP+DiDhi population had a distinct profile of differentially expressed genes when compared with activated GFP+DiDneg cells (Fig. 4d). The 100 most significantly upregulated genes and 100 most significantly downregulated genes in GFP+DiDhi cells are shown in Supplementary Table 2. GFP+DiDhi cells were found to highly express genes related to immune responses, including those encoding interferon-induced molecules and regulatory factors, which have been implicated in controlling breast cancer bone metastasis35. Notably, GFP+DiDhi cells also expressed higher levels of the cell adhesion molecule Vcam1, which has also been implicated in breast cancer metastasis36, and Axl, a member of the TAM family of receptor tyrosine kinases, implicated in prostate cancer cell dormancy37.

The endosteal niche reversibly controls myeloma cell growth

We next determined the micro-anatomical location of GFP+DiDhi and GFP+DiDneg cells by two-photon microscopy. These studies revealed that dormant GFP+DiDhi cells were preferentially located in direct contact with endosteal bone surfaces (defined by the second-harmonic signal from bone collagen), and this position did not change over time (Fig. 5a–c; Supplementary Movie 3). In contrast, activated GFP+DiDneg cells were preferentially found at locations distant from the bone surface (Fig. 5b,c). To confirm engagement of the endosteal bone niche by dormant myeloma cells, we inoculated DiD-labelled 5T33MM cells (GFPneg cells) into Kal-Col-GFP transgenic mice that express the emerald GFP protein (emdGFP) under the control of the type-I collagen 2.3-kb promoter, which is expressed by osteoblastic lineage cells38. Individual DiDhi 5T33MM cells were localized directly adjacent to bone surfaces occupied by emdGFP+ cells (Fig. 5d). These data suggested that the endosteal niche actively suppressed myeloma cell growth. We therefore cultured DiDhi cells in osteoblast-conditioned media or co-cultured them with MC3T3 murine osteoblast-like cells and demonstrated increased numbers of GFP+DiDhi cells in both systems as compared with control. These data suggest that factors made by osteoblasts suppressed proliferation, maintaining GFP+DiDhi cells in a dormant state (Fig. 5e,f). In contrast, media conditioned by RAW264.7 macrophages, a surrogate for osteoclasts, promoted the proliferation and growth of GFP+DiDhi cells, whereas myeloma cell-conditioned media had no effect (Fig. 5e).

Figure 5: Dormancy can be switched on and off by the bone environment.
figure5

(a) Measurement of distance of GFP+DiD+ cells to the nearest bone surface. (b) Comparison of the location of GFP+DiD+ and GFP+DiDneg cells. Arrows indicate median distance from bone surface. (c) Three-dimensional two-photon image of green GFP+DiDneg cells (white arrow) and yellow GFP+DiD+ cells (red arrows) localized to the bone surface, blue; scale bar, 100 μm. (d) Two-photon image of a DiD-labelled 5T33MM cell (arrow) localizing to the bone surface (SHG, white) lined with osteoblasts (col2.3 GFP+, green). (e) Effect of conditioned media (CM) from primary osteoblasts (pOsB, left panel), macrophage cell line (RAW264.7, middle panel) and myeloma cells (5TGM1, right panel) on cancer cell dormancy, unpaired t-test. (f) Effect of co-culture with osteoblast cell line MC3T3 on cancer cell dormancy. (g) Fluorescent and bright-field microscopy from in vitro cultures of FACS-sorted GFP+DiDhi long-term dormant cells; scale bar, 25 μm. (h) Cell count and DNA content of in vitro cultures from g, one-way ANOVA. (i) Schematic for isolation (day 21 post inoculation) and reinoculation of dormant GFP+DiD+ and activated GFP+DiDneg cells. (j) FACS analysis of bone from mice after second passage for myeloma cell burden. Data show percentage of GFP+ per bone marrow cells (mean±s.e.m., unpaired t-test). (k) Localization of dormant GFP+CMDiI+ (white arrows, left panel) and dormant GFP+DiD+ (white arrows, middle panel) cells adjacent to bone surfaces from two-photon microscopy of ex vivo tibia (bone, white) and enumeration of GFP+CMDiI+ and GFP+DiD+ cells per mm2 bone. Scale bars, 200 μm. Data in e,f,h,j and k show mean±s.e.m. Data represent at least two experiments. NS, not significant.

We next asked whether release of dormant myeloma cells from the endosteal niche would reverse this suppression, and whether re-engagement with the endosteal niche by active myeloma cells would return them to a dormant state. In the first instance, we FACS-sorted GFP+DiDhi cells from disease-bearing mice on day 17 and cultured them in vitro. By day 4, cultured individual GFP+DiDhi cells had divided to form small clusters of 2–6 GFP+ cells with a diminished DiD label (Fig. 5g). By day 14, the cells had completely lost the DiD label through proliferation, and the cell number and DNA content had correspondingly increased (Fig. 5g,h). This was recapitulated in vivo by FACS-sorting GFP+DiDhi cells, 21 days after cell inoculation, and relabelling with DiD before secondary inoculation into naive mice (Fig. 5i). Upon transfer, these previously dormant cells proliferated and formed tumours. Reciprocally, FACS-sorted active GFP+DiDneg cells, labelled with an alternative membrane dye CMDiI, were also able to recolonize bone and form tumour (Fig. 5j). Importantly, a small fraction of the CMDil-labelled cells localized adjacent to the endosteal bone surface, retained their dye label and hence did not divide (Fig. 5k). Thus, even though the cells had previously been actively dividing, re-engagement with the endosteal niche was able to suppress the growth of a subpopulation of these cells and switch on dormancy in vivo. Remarkably, dormant cells were detected adjacent to bone surfaces in mice inoculated with either GFP+DiDhi- or GFP+DiDneg-relabelled cells at similar frequencies, indicating that dormancy was not an intrinsic property of the cell (Fig. 5k). Collectively, these data suggest that suppression of myeloma cell growth by the endosteal niche is a transient reversible state that can be switched ‘on’ or ‘off’.

Limited numbers of dormant myeloma cells get activated

To study dormant myeloma cells and their transition to actively proliferating cells, we performed longitudinal two-photon imaging of the tibia from the same mice at 7, 14 and 20–21 days post cell inoculation (Fig. 6a,b). At day 14, small GFP+ colonies were visualized adjacent to bone surfaces (Fig. 6a), which on re-imaging at day 20 had increased in size and were associated with what appeared to be osteolytic lesions in the cortical bone (Fig. 6a, right panels; Supplementary Movie 4). At day 7, individual dormant GFP+DiDhi cells were localized to endocortical bone surfaces and limited numbers of small individual colonies, containing <10 GFP+DiDneg cells per colony, were identified (Fig. 6b). Re-imaging at days 14 and 21 demonstrated the persistence of dormant GFP+DiDhi cells (arrows) and the development of activated GFP+DiDneg colonies (Fig. 6b). Importantly, dormant GFP+DiDhi cells, transitioning to actively growing GFP+DiDneg cells, were also visualized (Fig. 6b, circles). Immunohistochemistry revealed discrete CD138+ tumour colonies (Fig. 6c) and single, CD138+ cells that had not divided adjacent to bone surfaces, consistent with the intravital imaging (Fig. 6c, bottom right panel). Similar results were obtained with the 5T2MM murine model of myeloma (Fig. 6d). The proportion of medullary cavity occupied by CD138+ cells increased until it was completely replaced by tumour (Fig. 6e, left panel). Notably, the tumour colony count reached a maximum at day 14 post inoculation before decreasing in number, reflecting the coalescence of colonies (Fig. 6e, right panel). In contrast, the number of single CD138+ cells always exceeded the maximum number of colonies (Fig. 6e, middle panel). Taken together, these data suggest that only a small proportion of GFP+DiDhi cells are activated to form proliferating GFP+DiDneg colonies, while the remainder were maintained in a dormant state.

Figure 6: Longitudinal intravital two-photon imaging of dormant cancer cell activation and colony formation.
figure6

(a) Mosaic tile maximum intensity projection of the same 3 mm region of interest in the same tibia over time at 14 and 20 days showing expansion of a single GFP+DiDneg colony (green); scale bar 400 μm. Middle panel enface z-stacks of each colony, right top, higher magnification of the MIP image from the 20-day z-stack with the green removed revealing a hole in the cortical bone. This hole was associated with the GFP+DiDneg colony at 20 days and was also captured by 3D reconstruction of a MicroCT scan, right bottom; scale bars, 40 μm. (b) Three-dimensional maximum intensity projection of the same tibia at 7, 14 and 21 days showing expansion of a GFP+DiDneg colony (green), persistence of the dormant GFP+DiD+ cell (white arrow) and disappearance of a transitioning GFP+DiD+ cell (white circle). Scale bars, 50 μm. (c) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) showing eight individual CD138+ cancer cell colonies (brown) within the bone marrow on day 14 (left panel). Scale bar, 1 mm. Inset shows an individual colony (left: scale bar, 100 μm) and multiple single CD138+ cells (black arrows) adjacent to bone surfaces (right: scale bar, 50 μm). BM, bone marrow; CB, cortical bone; GP, growth plate; PT, proximal tibia. (d) IHC of CD138+ stained cancer cell colony from the 5T2MM murine model of myeloma (scale bar, 100 μm). (e) Quantification of IHC-stained CD138+ single cells and colonies within the bone marrow. Data are represented per section of the entire bone. Data (mean±s.e.m., one-way ANOVA) represent at least two experiments.

Dormant myeloma cells are resistant to melphalan

Since conventional anticancer drugs target actively dividing cells, we examined the response of GFP+DiDhi and GFP+DiDneg cells to melphalan, an alkylating agent commonly used to treat myeloma. Indeed, microarray analysis and GSEA demonstrated that gene sets involved in the response and sensitivity to melphalan were negatively enriched in dormant GFP+DiDhi cells, suggesting that these cells may be resistant to melphalan due to their lack of proliferation (Fig. 7a). To test this, we treated disease-bearing mice with melphalan and quantified the response by enumeration of dormant GFP+DiDhi cells and activated GFP+DiDneg cells by FACS analysis and two-photon microscopy of explanted tibia (Fig. 7b–d). While all mice responded to melphalan with significant decreases in tumour burden, the response was variable with some mice achieving >99% reduction, and others only able to achieve 90–99% reduction (Fig. 7b). Nevertheless, despite the decrease in GFP+ myeloma cells, dormant GFP+DiDhi cells were remarkably stable and could be detected in all mice while on treatment, with the proportion of GFP+DiDhi cells increasing relative to total GFP+ cells (Fig. 7b). Consistent with this, two-photon microscopy demonstrated a reduction in GFP+DiDneg cells and a persistence of GFP+DiDhi cells apposed to endosteal surfaces (Fig. 7c,d). These data suggest that dormant GFP+DiDhi cells are resistant to melphalan and may contribute to disease relapse upon drug withdrawal. In contrast, treatment of disease-bearing mice with bortezomib, which targets both dividing and non-dividing cells, reduced myeloma burden and also the proportion of GFP+DiDhi dormant cells, suggesting that dormant cells may respond differently to different agents (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Figure 7: Preclinical testing of drug efficacy against dormant cancer cells.
figure7

(a) Gene set enrichment analysis of genes associated with melphalan sensitivity downregulated in the GFP+DiDhi as compared with GFP+DiDneg cells. (b) FACS analysis of total GFP+ cells (left panels. % of bone marrow cells) and GFP+DiDhi cells (right panels, % of GFP+ cells) for two separate experiments (expt 1 and expt 2). Data show mean±s.e.m. and represent 6–10 mice per group. (c) Three-dimensional maximum intensity projection from ex vivo two-photon imaging of bone from vehicle (top panels) and melphalan-treated mice (bottom panels). Scale bar, 20 μm. (d) Data from Imaris generated spots on mosaic tiles of femurs from vehicle and melphalan-treated mice for number of GFP+ cells (left panel) and number of GFP+DiD+ cells (middle panel) per bone. Percent GFP+DiD+ of GFP+ cells is also shown (right panel). Data show mean±s.e.m. and represent six mice per group (e) FACS analysis of GFP+ cells (left panels, % of bone marrow cells) and GFP+DiDhi cells (right panels, % of GFP+ cells) in melphalan-treated mice to day 28 (melphalan) or recovered from melphalan (melphalan recovery: 1 or 2 weeks) for two separate experiments (expt 2 and expt 3). Data show mean±s.e.m. and represent 6–10 mice per group, unpaired t-test. (f) Mosaic tiled images of intravital two-photon imaging of the same mouse at days 28 when melphalan was ceased, and day 42 after 2 weeks of recovery following melphalan cessation. Middle panel, higher-magnification images of the region in the white box in the same position of the bone at days 28 and 42. At day 28, small green (GFP+DiDneg) colonies and single red (GFP+DiD+) cells (white circles) are shown more clearly when the green channel is removed from the image (right panels). At day 42, all of the red (GFP+DiD+) cells have been activated and the green (GFP+DiDneg) colonies expanded, except for a single red cell (arrow). Scale bars, 500 μm (left panel), 100 μm (middle and right panels).

To directly address the contribution of GFP+DiDhi cells to disease relapse, we treated disease-bearing mice with melphalan for 14 days, identified individual dormant GFP+DiDhi cells and actively growing GFP+DiDneg colonies by intravital imaging and then re-imaged the same mice either 7 or 14 days after treatment withdrawal to track their fate. Following treatment cessation, FACS analysis demonstrated a significant increase in the number of GFP+DiDneg cells, confirming escape from therapeutic control and mimicking disease relapse (Fig. 7e). However, unlike in the treatment setting, dormant GFP+DiDhi cell numbers decreased following treatment withdrawal, consistent with their reactivation and their role in repopulating the tumour (Fig. 7e). In support of this, longitudinal intravital two-photon microscopy demonstrated a reduction in individual GFP+DiDhi cells as the tumour repopulated the marrow following cessation of treatment at day 28 (Fig. 7f, circles).

Bone resorption activates dormant myeloma cells

To directly test the impact of manipulating the bone microenvironment on disease activity, we treated disease-bearing mice with a soluble form of the ligand for the receptor activator of NFκB (sRANKL), which is expressed by osteoblasts and osteocytes and is critical for osteoclast formation and bone resorption39. Daily treatment with sRANKL for 3 days in naive BKAL mice resulted in a significant reduction in trabecular bone volume and bone surface (Fig. 8a,b), along with a significant decrease in trabecular number and an increase in trabecular separation (data not shown). These structural changes in bone were associated with an increase in osteoclasts within trabecular bone regions and on endocortical bone surfaces (Fig. 8c,d) and an increase in serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, a marker of osteoclast activity (Fig. 8d, bottom panel). Importantly, FACS analysis demonstrated that manipulation of the bone microenvironment resulted in a significant decrease in the number of dormant GFP+DiDhi cells in the bone marrow, as anticipated (Fig. 8e). Interestingly, although there was also a modest reduction in myeloma burden, there were fewer GFP+DiDhi cells as a proportion of the GFP+ tumour burden (Fig. 8e). Importantly, sRANKL treatment had no effect on myeloma cells in the spleen (Fig. 8f), confirming that the effect on GFP+DiDhi cells was a myeloma cell-extrinsic effect mediated by osteoclasts in the bone, with osteoclast activation associated with the release of GFP+DiDhi cells from the endosteal niche. Quantitative assessment of GFP+DiD+ and GFP+DiDneg cells by two-photon microscopy confirmed the decrease in numbers of GFP+DiD+ cells relative to both bone marrow volume and GFP+DiDneg tumour (Fig. 8g,h). Interestingly, intravital imaging did not demonstrate a decrease in GFP+DiDneg tumour burden, which may reflect the smaller sample volume or a differential distribution of tumour, compared with analysis by FACS. Thus, sRANKL induces osteoclastic bone resorption and can release dormant myeloma cells from osteoblastic or bone-lining-cell suppression, making them available to contribute to disease progression and/or relapse. To establish whether bone resorption is associated with myeloma burden, we examined serum levels of C-terminal telopeptide (CTX), a biochemical marker of bone resorption, and β2-microglobulin (β2m) as a measure of tumour burden in 118 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. CTX was significantly correlated with β2m (R2=0.3588, P<0.0001, Pearson’s correlation), suggesting that increased bone resorption is related to tumour burden in patients (Fig. 8i). Taken together, these data suggest that dormant cells held in the endosteal niche can be reactivated by osteoclasts remodelling the endosteal niche (Fig. 8j).

Figure 8: RANKL-driven alterations in the endosteal niche activate dormant tumour cells.
figure8

(a) Three-dimensional reconstructions of MicroCT scans of representative tibia from vehicle- and RANKL-treated naive mice after 3 days of treatment. (b) Trabecular bone volume of total volume (BV/TV) and trabecular bone surface (BS) in metaphyseal bone in vehicle- and RANKL-treated mice. (c) Representative sections of TRAP-stained tibia from trabecular and endocortical regions of vehicle- and RANKL-treated naive mice; scale bar, 100 μm. (d) Histograms of osteoclast surface per mm bone surface for trabecular (top) and endocortical (middle) bone and serum TRAP levels (bottom). Data are from one experiment with 9–10 mice per group. (e) FACS analysis of GFP+DiDneg cells (left, % of bone marrow cells), GFP+DiDhi (middle % of bone marrow cells) and percent GFP+DiDhi (right % of GFP+) from bone marrow samples. (f) FACS analysis of GFP+ cells (left, % of spleen cells), GFP+DiDhi (middle, % of spleen cells) and GFP+DiDhi (right, % of GFP+) from spleen samples. (g) Analysis of two-photon mosaic tiles of total number of GFP+ cells (left), number of GFP+DiDhi cells (middle) and GFP+DiDhi (right % of GFP+) in the analysed endocortical region. Data show mean±s.e.m. and represent 6–10 mice per group, unpaired t-test. (h) Two-photon generated 3D images of multiple GFP+DiD+ dormant cells (white arrows) in the vehicle-treated mice compared with few or none in the RANKL treated; scale bars, 60 μm. (i) Correlation between serum CTX and serum β2m levels in myeloma patients, Pearson’s correlation. (j) Schematic depicting myeloma cell dormancy on quiescent bone surfaces and myeloma cell reactivation on actively resorbing bone surface. Data are from one experiment with six mice per group.

Discussion

Cancer cell dormancy is increasingly recognized as an important clinical problem. Despite improved outcomes from new, targeted therapies, patients continue to suffer from relapse and metastases, which are major causes of morbidity and mortality. Thus, there is an increasing need to understand cancer cell dormancy to prevent drug resistance and disease relapse. This is particularly true in multiple myeloma where patients now achieve complete responses to state-of-the-art combination therapy, yet still harbour drug-resistant dormant myeloma cells as MRD and go on to progress at a later time point. Consequently, understanding the extrinsic control of dormant myeloma cells by the bone microenvironment has the potential to uncover novel therapeutic approaches. These may be used in combination with current treatments to either completely eradicate myeloma cells, or to maintain MRD in a dormant state and achieve long-term remission. Accordingly, we developed a unique, non-destructive, method to track the fate of individual myeloma cells, longitudinally, as they colonize the endosteal niche and form tumour colonies over weeks or months, in live mice by intravital two-photon microscopy. By imaging through a natural optical window in the tibia, we have overcome the long-held misconception that non-destructive intravital microscopy of bone can only be performed in the calvaria. Importantly, the tibia has different developmental origins from the calvaria and may also contain distinct anatomical and functional compartments that constitute the specialized microenvironments required for myeloma cell colonization, retention of dormancy and growth. Using this novel approach, we demonstrated that myeloma cells entered the bone marrow, left the vasculature and migrated directly towards endosteal surfaces where they arrested in sites containing type-I collagen-expressing osteoblasts or bone-lining cells. This is consistent with the immunohistochemical studies reporting the presence of leukaemic cells and primary myeloma cells adjacent to bone surfaces11,40.

Our intravital studies of myeloma cell dormancy were facilitated by the use of a lipophilic membrane dye, DiD, to identify dormant GFP-expressing myeloma cells that had not undergone cell division. This was supported by the detection of stable numbers of these cells throughout the duration of the experimental time course following initial equilibration, indicating that they are long-lived dormant cells. In addition, analysis of Ki67 expression and DAPI staining showed that the majority of GFP+DiDhi cells were in the resting G0 phase when compared with the GFP+DiDneg population. Furthermore, transcriptional analysis demonstrated that the GFP+DiDhi population maintained this long-lived persistent dormant phenotype by downregulating genes that control the cell cycle. Interestingly, a limited number of the GFP+DiDhi cells were also Ki67 positive, suggesting that, in certain niches, dormant cells may have recently been activated to divide. This challenges the notion that dormancy is a synchronized period of inactivity and supports the idea that dormancy may instead result from the dynamic interplay between myeloma cells in the multiple heterogeneous niches and may exist in different states of activation.

To establish whether dormancy was a fixed or reversible state, we removed dormant GFP+DiDhi cells from their bone niche, relabelled them with DiD and reinoculated them into naive mice. We showed that some of the GFP+DiDhi cells remained dormant while others were released from dormancy in their new microenvironment and became activated to form GFP+DiDneg colonies. Remarkably, in the reciprocal experiment, when we removed proliferating GFP+DiDneg cells and labelled them with CMDiL before reinoculation, these cells not only formed colonies but could also be induced to enter a dormant state in their naive host bone environment. These observations infer that cancer cell dormancy is a reversible state that can be switched ‘on’ or ‘off’ by microenvironmental signals. Interestingly, we also showed that of the many dormant tumour cells that locate to the endosteal niche, only limited numbers become reactivated to form overt myeloma colonies. This is reminiscent of the ‘clonal tides’ and altering clonal dominance that is observed in patients exposed to different drug regimens6,8,9,10. In addition, the plasticity of the 5TGM1 cells under these experimental conditions and the fact that 89% of GFP+DiDhi cells are CD138+ suggests that dormant myeloma cells are distinct from cancer stem cells, which are thought to be poorly differentiated cancer cell precursors41, and the myeloma stem cell, which have been reported to be CD138neg (refs 42, 43).

Crucially, the proportion of dormant GFP+DiDhi and proliferating GFP+DiDneg myeloma cells that form colonies or became dormant after secondary transplantation were comparable. This indicated that stochastic engagement with the relevant bone niche was more important than an intrinsic developmental programme in determining the fate of the transplanted myeloma cells. Consistent with this, osteoblast-conditioned media and co-culture with MC3T3 osteoblast-like cells maintained dormancy and suppressed proliferation, whereas osteoclast-like cell-conditioned media stimulated myeloma cell growth. This is consistent with studies in vitro, which show that growth of patient-derived multiple myeloma cells is suppressed when cultured with patient-derived osteoblasts and inhibition of myeloma growth when patient-derived MSCs are delivered systemically or directly into bones of SCID-hu MM-bearing mice44,45. While the mechanisms responsible for suppression of multiple myeloma cell growth and holding MM cells in a dormant state are poorly defined, they may include release of bone morphogenic proteins46 or secretion of Wnt proteins and Wnt antagonists47,48. Furthermore, our gene expression analysis has identified a number of cellular adhesion molecules and membrane receptors, including Vcam1 and Axl, that could also play a role in interactions between dormant myeloma cells and cells in the endosteal niche. Importantly, expression of these molecules may be used as biomarkers to help identify dormant myeloma cells in bone and may also provide new therapeutic targets to aid in the erradication of these cells. Taken together, these data suggest that the extrinsic bone microenvironment, and likely an endosteal niche, plays a critical role in controlling myeloma cell dormancy.

Dormant GFP+DiDhi cells were more resistant than proliferating GFP+DiDneg cells to melphalan treatment, but not to the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. This may argue that dormant cells are intrinsically resistant to chemotherapeutic agents that target dividing cells by virtue of their dormant state. Moreover, even in mice with >99% reduction in tumour burden, GFP+DiDhi cells were still detectable and contributed to the re-establishment of myeloma growth following melphalan treatment withdrawal. This ‘awakening’ of dormant cells during recovery may be a result of alterations in the local environment. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that direct manipulation of the bone microenvironment itself would impact on dormancy and provide a mechanism for reactivating dormant cells. Short-term treatment with sRANKL increased osteoclast numbers, resorption activity and decreased the bone surface containing endosteal niches. This osteoclastic activity released GFP+DiDhi cells from dormancy and resulted in a specific reduction of GFP+DiDhi cells in the bone, but not in the spleen. Consistent with this, serum CTX levels were found to correlate with serum β2m, a marker of tumour burden, in a large cohort of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. These data suggest that bone resorption, simply by remodelling the endosteal niche as part of normal physiological function, may inadvertently activate dormant tumour cells, arguing that activation of dormant cells is an environmentally controlled stochastic event. Interestingly, despite the increased osteoclast activity following RANKL treatment, not all of the bone surface undergoes resorption and as a result dormant cells are still present, suggesting mobilization events are a localized phenomena. The reason why mobilization of dormant cells was associated with a reduction in myeloma burden is unclear. This could reflect a difference in the rate of growth of mobilized cells following treatment or alternatively that, dormant cells that were mobilized by sRANKL died without undergoing cell division; however, the latter is not consistent with our studies, showing these cells have the capacity to grow in vitro and in vivo (Fig. 5). Nevertheless, these data suggest that stimulation of bone resorption may result in synchronized activation of dormant cells, thereby rendering them more susceptible to targeted therapies. Or that inhibition of bone resorption by anti-resorptive agents, such as bisphosphonates, may enforce cellular dormancy and prevent myeloma cell activation and relapse.

These data therefore have significant clinical implications. We already know inhibitors of bone resorption, including bisphosphonates and strategies to block RANKL, reduce myeloma burden in experimental models49,50,51. Furthermore, bisphosphonate treatment is associated with improvements in survival that may be independent of the development of skeletal-related events52; however, the mechanisms responsible remain unclear. These data may provide at least one explanation for these observations, that is, that bisphosphonate treatment may prevent reactivation of dormant myeloma cells. It could also argue that consideration needs to be given to very early anti-resorptive treatment to prevent activation of dormant tumour cells to sustain long-term remission. This is certainly supported by studies in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, which show that patients with increased bone resorption are more likely to develop overt myeloma53.

The experimental data presented here provide the basis for developing novel approaches to prevent disease progression in myeloma. This could include repurposing bone-active drugs as frontline therapies, to be used in combination with targeted therapies, to prevent the reactivation of dormant myeloma cells and sustain long-term remission. Alternatively, the promotion of bone resorption to release tumour cells from dormancy may facilitate their targeting by the existing armamentarium of drugs to eliminate MRD and achieve long-term remission or even cure. Finally, further studies of the molecular mechanisms that regulate dormancy within the endosteal niche may reveal druggable targets that control myeloma reactivation. Thus, this new knowledge of the extrinsic control of cancer cell dormancy has implications for understanding cancer pathogenesis and the potential to unlock opportunities for developing innovative treatment strategies.

Methods

Mice and in vivo mouse models

Six-to-eight-week-old C57BL/KaLwRijHsd (BKAL) male mice (Harlan, Netherlands) were injected intravenously with 2 × 106 syngeneic 5TGM1-eGFP (a gift from Dr Oyajobi, University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio, Texas, USA) or 5T33MM murine myeloma cells in 200 μl PBS54,55. Cells were negative for mycoplasma. On specified days post injection, mice were killed for FACS analysis and two-photon imaging of explanted bones. In separate studies, 6–8-week-old male BKAL mice were injected with 5T2MM murine myeloma cells and killed 7 weeks later to examine tumour colony formation. BKAL mice were also crossed with mice expressing emerald GFP under the type-I collagen promoter (pOBCol2.3GFPemd)38 to produce C57BL/KaLwRijHsd.Cg-Tg (Col1a1-GFP) denoted as Kal-Col-GFP mice to mark osteoblastic cells in vivo. For drug studies, BKAL mice were injected with DiD-labelled 5TGM1-eGFP cells. After 2 weeks, mice were injected, intraperitoneally, three times a week for 2 weeks with melphalan (Sigma-Aldrich, 5 mg kg−1 in 17.5% ethanol) or vehicle56; or twice a week, subcutaneously, with bortezomib (Sigma-Aldrich, 0.7 mg kg−1 in 0.005% dimethylsulphoxide). Mice were killed 4 weeks later and 1 or 2 weeks after cessation of melphalan treatment. Tibia, femurs and spleens were isolated for FACS and two-photon imaging. Drug studies were performed in two separate experiments. Recombinant soluble RANKL-GST fusion protein (RANKL, Oriental Yeast Company Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) or saline was administered at a dose of 0.5 mg kg−1 intraperitoneally daily for 3 days in naive mice before harvest on day 4. RANKL was administered on days 4–6 post cell injection and experiments ceased 18 days later. Experiments were approved by the Garvan Institute/St Vincent’s Hospital (#12_20), University of Sheffield (PPL 40/3,462) and Vrije Universiteit Brussel (#13-281-5) Animal Ethics Committees.

Cancer cell lines and intravital labelling of dormant cells

5TGM1-eGFP and 5T33MM myeloma cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin, and incubated in 5% CO2 at 37 °C (refs 54, 55). 5T2MM cells were maintained by serial passage in BKAL mice54. Cells were labelled with DiD, or 3H-Indolium, 5-[[[4-(chloromethyl)benzoyl]amino]methyl]-2-[3-(1,3-dihydro-3,3-dimethyl-1-octadecyl-2H-indol-2-ylidene)-1-propenyl]-3,3-dimethyl-1-octadecyl-, chloride (CMDiI) (Molecular Probes).

In vitro conditioned media and co-culture experiments

Primary osteoblasts were isolated from calvaria of 2–4-day-old C57BL/6 mice and differentiated in MEMα supplemented with ascorbic acid, β-glycerol phosphate, ribonucleosides and 10% FCS for 4 weeks57,58. DiD-labelled 5TGM1-eGFP cells were cultured either in media, or in media conditioned with 5TGM1, RAW264 cells or primary osteoblasts. DiD-labelled 5TGM1-eGFP cells were co-cultured with MC3T3 murine osteoblast-like cells plated in RPMI, supplemented with 10% FCS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 1% Glutamax.

Two-photon microscopy of explanted tibias and femurs

At the University of Sheffield, the tibia or femur were embedded in OCT solution (Tissue-Tek) and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen before cryosectioning. Images were acquired with an inverted Zeiss 510 META (Carl Zeiss). Two-photon excitation at 820 nm was achieved with a Chameleon XR Ti:Sa laser (Coherent) and fluorescence detected using the following: BP435-485 to detect blue (second-harmonic generation), BP 500–550 to detect green (GFP), BP 565–615 IR to detect orange/red (CMDiI) and BP 650–710 nm to detect far-red (DiD). In some images (Figs 3 and 4; Supplementary Fig. 2) this was pseudocoloured white. Three-dimensional (3D) mosaic tiles were performed at 128 × 128 pixel resolution and individual 450 × 450 × 150 μm volumes imaged at 256 × 256 pixel resolution in 2-μm z-steps. Three-dimensional volumes were reconstructed and analysed using Volocity software (Improvision, Perkin Elmer). At the Garvan Institute of Medical Research, imaging was performed on intact tibias or cryosectioned femurs using an upright Zeiss 7MP microscope (Carl Zeiss). We used LBF 760 and BSMP2 760 filters to enable detection of the far-red emission of BSA-Alexa Fluor680 and DiD. Four external non-descanned detectors were used to detect blue (second-harmonic generation, SP 485), green (BP 500–550), red (BP 565–610) and far-red (BP 640–710). Infrared excitation at 920 nm was provided by a Chameleon Vision II Ti:Sa laser (Coherent Scientific). Each 512 × 512-pixel xy-plane was acquired at 2–3-μm z-step intervals. Time-lapse images were acquired at 30-s intervals. Images were acquired using ZEN 2009 software (Zeiss) and raw image files processed using Imaris (Bitplane). Red dormant cells and green activated cancer cells were counted using the spot detection function in Imaris.

Real-time intravital two-photon microscopy of the tibia

Mice were anaesthetized as described59. Anaesthetized mice were kept warm using a customized heated SmartStage (Biotherm). An incision was made over the medial surface of the tibia and soft tissue resected. Mice were intravenously injected with a single dose of Alexa Fluor680/bovine serum albumin (2.5–10.0 mg kg−1, Invitrogen) to label blood vessels. 5TGM1-eGFP cells were injected four frames (2 min) after commencement of imaging. A Gaussian filter was applied and the display adjusted to reduce background noise and improve contrast in Imaris. Videos were compiled and annotated using Adobe AfterEffects (Adobe). Myeloma cells were counted as circulating cells if they entered and left the imaging volume within two consecutive frames. Colonizing cells entered, crawled and arrested within the imaging volume and could be found in the same location again at least 5 min later.

Longitudinal intravital two-photon microscopy of the tibia

For longitudinal imaging, 2 × 106 DiD-labelled 5TGM1-eGFP cells were injected 7 days before the initial imaging session. During imaging, a 3D mosaic tile image was captured to include the growth plate and other landmarks as fiducial markers to enable repeated imaging of the same volume. Mice were recovered after imaging, the skin sutured and buprenorphine hydrochloride 0.5 mg kg−1 subcutaneously administered. Mice were re-imaged on days 14 and 21 in the same region based on the position of the fiducial markers.

Micro-computed tomography of the tibia

Bones were scanned using a μCT scanner (Model 1172; Skyscan) at 50 kV, 200 mA with a 0.5-mm aluminium filter using a pixel size of 4.3 μm. Images were captured every 0.4˚ through 180˚, reconstructed and analysed using NRecon and CTAn software (Skyscan). Three-dimensional models were created using the Drishti-2 tool (https://code.google.com/p/drishti-2/).

Histology

Bones were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, decalcified in EDTA, embedded in paraffin and 4-μm sections were cut. Antigen retrieval was performed in trypsin (Biocare Medical) at 37°C for 10 min, and washed for 5 min in PBS. Nonspecific binding was blocked in 10% FCS and 10% normal goat serum (S-1000, Vector Laboratories) for 1 h at room temperature (RT). Primary antibody (rat anti-mouse anti-CD138, clone 281-2, BD Pharmingen) and isotype control (purified rat IgG2a, κ-isotype control, clone R35-95 BD Pharmingen) were incubated for 1 h at RT at a dilution of 1:300 and washed in PBS. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 3% hydrogen peroxide (Sigma) for 30 min at RT. Primary antibody was detected with a secondary biotinylated goat anti-rat IgG F(ab)2 fragment (SC-3,826, Santa Cruz) incubated for 30 min at RT and washed in PBS before incubation with strepavidin-horseradish peroxidase (DakoCytomation) for 30 min at RT. Antigen/antibody complex was visualized with 3,3,diaminobenzadine (SK-4105, Vector Laboratories) and counter-stained with haematoxylin. CD138+ve cells and colonies were counted and data expressed/bone section. Identical data were obtained when data were expressed per unit area.

FACS analysis

Bones were flushed with PBS/2% FCS, cut longitudinally and the inner surface was scraped with a scalpel blade. Bones (including the epiphysis) were minced and fragments flushed with PBS/2% FCS. Cells were syringed five times through a 23-G needle and filtered through a 100-mm nylon cell strainer (Nunc). Red cells were lysed with 0.15 M NH4Cl. Cells were resuspended in PBS/2% FCS and filtered through a 70-mm strainer. For Ki67 staining, samples were incubated with Fixable Viability Dye eFluor780 (eBioscience) and then Fc-blocked with anti-mouse CD16/32 before fixation with the Nuclear Factor Fixation and Permeabilization Buffer Set (BioLegend). Cells were then incubated with PE anti-mouse Ki67 at a dilution of 1:100 (BioLegend) and DAPI to stain DNA. For CD11b, Gr-1, CD138 and B220 staining, samples were incubated with Fixable Viability Dye eFluor780, then Fc-blocked with anti-mouse CD16/32. Cells were then incubated with PE anti-mouse B220, PERCP-Cy5.5 anti-mouse CD11b, Pe-Cy7 anti-mouse CD138 (clone 281-2) and Brilliant Violet 450 anti-mouse Gr-1 (BioLegend) at a dilution of 1:100. Samples were acquired on a FACSCanto II or LSR II SORP (BD Biosciences). Analysis was performed with FlowJo software (Tree Star). For microarray analysis, up to 50,000 cells were sorted using BD FACSAria II or BD FACSAria III (BD Biosciences) directly into 0.5 ml of TRIzol LS reagent (Life Technologies Australia).

Transcript profiling

Total RNA was extracted using Trizol LS reagent and its integrity measured using a Total RNA Pico Chip (Agilent Technologies) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Complementary DNA was prepared and amplified using the NuGEN Ovation Pico System V2, and hybridized with GeneChip Mouse Gene 2.0 ST Arrays (Affymetrix). Normalization and probe set summarization was performed using the robust multichip average implemented through the Affymetrix library within R60. Control probe sets were removed leaving 31,235 probe sets on the array following batch-correction using SVA package in R61. Differential gene expression was assessed for each probe set using an empirical Bayes, moderated t-statistic implemented in Limma using the limmaGP tool in GenePattern60. GSEA34 was performed with the GenePattern tool GSEA pre-ranked using a ranked list of the Limma-moderated t-statistics against version 3.0 of the ‘C2_all’ curated gene sets from the MSigDB supplemented with gene lists related to stem cell regulation, metastasis and melphalan treatment62,33. Functional annotation of 867 significant genes (fold change >2, Q-value<0.05) was performed using database for annotation, visualization and integrated discovery (DAVID)64,65. All analyses were performed using GenePattern software66 and are available at http://pwbc.garvan.unsw.edu.au/gp/. The microarray data have been deposited in the GEO database under accession code GSE57695.

Patient serum analysis

Newly diagnosed myeloma patients, who had not received chemotherapy, were included in this study. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Royal Adelaide Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee and informed consent was obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Staging was based on the ISS criteria. Of the 118 patients examined, 53 were female (median age at diagnosis, 67 years; range, 47–83 years) and 66 were male (median age at diagnosis, 61 years; range, 49–74 years). Serum β2m, a marker of tumour burden in renal-sufficient patients, creatinine concentrations and creatinine-based renal parameters (estimated glomerular filtration rate and creatinine clearance) were evaluated using an Olympus AU5400 Chemistry Analyzer. Patients with renal insufficiency were excluded from further analysis. Serum levels of C-terminal collagen crosslinks (CTX-1) were measured using a Roche modular E170 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Castle Hill, Australia).

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using Prism software (GraphPad). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons were performed using Tukey’s correction. Unpaired t-tests were performed when comparing two populations. Non-parametric data were assessed using Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA. Two-way ANOVA were used for grouped analyses (co-culture) with Sidak’s correction. Correlations between serum CTX-1 and β2m were assessed using linear regression analysis. All data are expressed with error bars representing s.e.m.

Additional information

Accession codes: The microarray data have been deposited in the GEO database under accession code GSE57695.

How to cite this article: Lawson, M. A. et al. Osteoclasts control reactivation of dormant myeloma cells by remodelling the endosteal niche. Nat. Commun. 6:8983 doi: 10.1038/ncomms9983 (2015).

Accession codes

Accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. 1

    Aguirre-Ghiso, J. A. Models, mechanisms and clinical evidence for cancer dormancy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 7, 834–846 (2007).

  2. 2

    Goss, P. E. & Chambers, A. F. Does tumour dormancy offer a therapeutic target? Nat. Rev. Cancer 10, 871–877 (2010).

  3. 3

    Schardt, J. A. et al. Genomic analysis of single cytokeratin-positive cells from bone marrow reveals early mutational events in breast cancer. Cancer Cell 8, 227–239 (2005).

  4. 4

    Chambers, A. F., Groom, A. C. & MacDonald, I. C. Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2, 563–572 (2002).

  5. 5

    San Miguel, J. F. et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 359, 906–917 (2008).

  6. 6

    Morgan, G. J., Walker, B. A. & Davies, F. E. The genetic architecture of multiple myeloma. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 335–348 (2012).

  7. 7

    Bolli, N. et al. Heterogeneity of genomic evolution and mutational profiles in multiple myeloma. Nat. Commun. 5, 2997 (2014).

  8. 8

    Egan, J. B. et al. Whole-genome sequencing of multiple myeloma from diagnosis to plasma cell leukemia reveals genomic initiating events, evolution, and clonal tides. Blood 120, 1060–1066 (2012).

  9. 9

    Keats, J. J. et al. Clonal competition with alternating dominance in multiple myeloma. Blood 120, 1067–1076 (2012).

  10. 10

    Melchor, L. et al. Single-cell genetic analysis reveals the composition of initiating clones and phylogenetic patterns of branching and parallel evolution in myeloma. Leukemias 28, 1705–1715 (2014).

  11. 11

    Chen, Z., Orlowski, R. Z., Wang, M., Kwak, L. & McCarty, N. Osteoblastic niche supports the growth of quiescent multiple myeloma cells. Blood 123, 2204–2208 (2014).

  12. 12

    Ding, L., Saunders, T. L., Enikolopov, G. & Morrison, S. J. Endothelial and perivascular cells maintain haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 481, 457–462 (2012).

  13. 13

    Kollet, O. et al. Osteoclasts degrade endosteal components and promote mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Nat. Med. 12, 657–664 (2006).

  14. 14

    Calvi, L. M. et al. Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature 425, 841–846 (2003).

  15. 15

    Mansour, A. et al. Osteoclasts promote the formation of hematopoietic stem cell niches in the bone marrow. J. Exp. Med. 209, 537–549 (2012).

  16. 16

    Visnjic, D. et al. Hamatopoiesis is severely altered in mice with an induced osteoblast deficiency. Blood 103, 3258–3264 (2004).

  17. 17

    Zhang, J. et al. Identification of the haematopoietic stem cell niche and control of the niche size. Nature 425, 836–841 (2003).

  18. 18

    Sacchetti, B. et al. Self-renewing osteoprogenitors in bone marrow sinusoids can organize a hematopoietic microenvironment. Cell 131, 324–336 (2007).

  19. 19

    Boyd, A. L. et al. Niche displacement of human leukemic stem cells uniquely allows their competitive replacement with healthy HSPCs. J. Exp. Med. 211, 1925–1935 (2014).

  20. 20

    Sipkins, D. A. et al. In vivo imaging of specialized bone marrow endothelial microdomains for tumour engraftment. Nature 435, 969–973 (2005).

  21. 21

    Shiozawa, Y. et al. Human prostate cancer metastases target the hematopoietic stem cell niche to establish footholds in mouse bone marrow. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 1298–1312 (2011).

  22. 22

    Mazo, I. B. et al. Hematopoietic progenitor cell rolling in bone marrow microvessels: parallel contributions by endothelial selectins and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1. J. Exp. Med. 188, 465–474 (1998).

  23. 23

    Junt, T. et al. Dynamic visualization of thrombopoiesis within bone marrow. Science 317, 1767–1770 (2007).

  24. 24

    Lo Celso, C. et al. Live-animal tracking of individual haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells in their niche. Nature 457, 92–96 (2009).

  25. 25

    Lo Celso, C., Lin, C. P. & Scadden, D. T. In vivo imaging of transplanted hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in mouse calvarium bone marrow. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1–14 (2011).

  26. 26

    Adams, G. B. et al. Haematopoietic stem cells depend on Galpha(s)-mediated signalling to engraft bone marrow. Nature 459, 103–107 (2009).

  27. 27

    Fujisaki, J. et al. In vivo imaging of Treg cells providing immune privilege to the haematopoietic stem-cell niche. Nature 474, 216–219 (2011).

  28. 28

    Roccaro, A. M. et al. BM mesenchymal stromal cell-derived exosomes facilitate multiple myeloma progression. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 1542–1555 (2013).

  29. 29

    Foudi, A. et al. Analysis of histone 2B-GFP retention reveals slowly cycling hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 84–90 (2009).

  30. 30

    Wilson, A. et al. Hematopoietic stem cells reversibly switch from dormancy to self-renewal during homeostasis and repair. Cell 135, 1118–1129 (2008).

  31. 31

    Tumbar, T. et al. Defining the epithelial stem cell niche in skin. Science 303, 359–363 (2004).

  32. 32

    Szotek, P. P. et al. Normal ovarian surface epithelial label-retaining cells exhibit stem/progenitor cell characteristics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 12469–12473 (2008).

  33. 33

    Lassailly, F., Griessinger, E. & Bonnet, D. "Microenvironmental contaminations" induced by fluorescent lipophilic dyes used for noninvasive in vitro and in vivo cell tracking. Blood 115, 5347–5354 (2010).

  34. 34

    Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).

  35. 35

    Bidwell, B. N. et al. Silencing of Irf7 pathways in breast cancer cells promotes bone metastasis through immune escape. Nat. Med. 18, 1224–1231 (2012).

  36. 36

    Lu, X. et al. VCAM-1 promotes osteolytic expansion of indolent bone micrometastasis of breast cancer by engaging alpha4beta1-positive osteoclast progenitors. Cancer cell 20, 701–714 (2011).

  37. 37

    Taichman, R. S. et al. GAS6 receptor status is associated with dormancy and bone metastatic tumor formation. PLoS ONE 8, e61873 (2013).

  38. 38

    Kalajzic, I. et al. Use of type I collagen green fluorescent protein transgenes to identify subpopulations of cells at different stages of the osteoblast lineage. J. Bone Miner. Res. 17, 15–25 (2002).

  39. 39

    Boyle, W. J., Simonet, W. S. & Lacey, D. L. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature 423, 337–342 (2003).

  40. 40

    Ninomiya, M. et al. Homing, proliferation and survival sites of human leukemia cells in vivo in immunodeficient mice. Leukemia 21, 136–142 (2007).

  41. 41

    Rosen, J. M. & Jordan, C. T. The increasing complexity of the cancer stem cell paradigm. Science 324, 1670–1673 (2009).

  42. 42

    Van Valckenborgh, E. et al. Tumor-initiating capacity of CD138- and CD138+ tumor cells in the 5T33 multiple myeloma model. Leukemia 26, 1436–1439 (2012).

  43. 43

    Matsui, W. et al. Clonogenic multiple myeloma progenitors, stem cell properties, and drug resistance. Cancer Res. 68, 190–197 (2008).

  44. 44

    Yaccoby, S. et al. Inhibitory effects of osteoblasts and increased bone formation on myeloma in novel culture systems and a myelomatous mouse model. Haematologica 91, 192–199 (2006).

  45. 45

    Li, X., Ling, W., Khan, S. & Yaccoby, S. Therapeutic effects of intrabone and systemic mesenchymal stem cell cytotherapy on myeloma bone disease and tumor growth. J. Bone Miner. Res. 27, 1635–1648 (2012).

  46. 46

    Ro, T. B. et al. Bone morphogenetic protein-5, -6 and -7 inhibit growth and induce apoptosis in human myeloma cells. Oncogene 23, 3024–3032 (2004).

  47. 47

    Tan, S. H. et al. Wnts produced by Osterix-expressing osteolineage cells regulate their proliferation and differentiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E5262–E5271 (2014).

  48. 48

    Dosen, G. et al. Wnt expression and canonical Wnt signaling in human bone marrow B lymphopoiesis. BMC Immunol. 7, 13 (2006).

  49. 49

    Croucher, P. I. et al. Osteoprotegerin inhibits the development of osteolytic bone disease in multiple myeloma. Blood 98, 3534–3540 (2001).

  50. 50

    Croucher, P. I. et al. Zoledronic acid treatment of 5T2MM-bearing mice inhibits the development of myeloma bone disease: evidence for decreased osteolysis, tumor burden and angiogenesis, and increased survival. J. Bone Miner. Res. 18, 482–492 (2003).

  51. 51

    Vanderkerken, K., Asosingh, K., Van Camp, B. & Croucher, P. Anti-tumor effect of recombinant OPG in the murine 5T33MM model. Blood 98, 637a (2001).

  52. 52

    Morgan, G. J. et al. First-line treatment with zoledronic acid as compared with clodronic acid in multiple myeloma (MRC Myeloma IX): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 376, 1989–1999 (2010).

  53. 53

    Bataille, R., Chappard, D. & Basle, M. Quantifiable excess of bone resorption in monoclonal gammopathy is an early sympton of malignancy: a prospective study of 87 bone biospies. Blood 87, 4762–4769 (1996).

  54. 54

    Vanderkerken, K. et al. Organ involvement and phenotypic adhesion profile of 5T2 and 5T33MM cells in the C57BL/KaLwRij mouse. Br. J. Cancer 76, 451–460 (1997).

  55. 55

    Oyajobi, B. O. et al. Detection of myeloma in skeleton of mice by whole-body optical fluorescence imaging. Mol. Cancer Ther. 6, 1701–1708 (2007).

  56. 56

    Riedel, S. S. et al. Non-invasive imaging provides spatiotemporal information on disease progression and response to therapy in a murine model of multiple myeloma. PLoS ONE 7, e52398 (2012).

  57. 57

    Sudo, H., Kodama, H. A., Amagai, Y., Yamamoto, S. & Kasai, S. In vitro differentiation and calcificatio n in a new clonal osteogenic cell line derived from newborn mouse calvaria. J. Cell Biol. 96, 191–198 (1983).

  58. 58

    Bakker, A. & Klein-Nulend, J. Osteoblast isolation from murine calvariae and long bones. Methods Mol. Med. 80, 19–28 (2003).

  59. 59

    Chtanova, T. et al. Real-time interactive two-photon photoconversion of recirculating lymphocytes for discontinuous cell tracking in live adult mice. J. Biophotonics 123, 2204–2208 (2012).

  60. 60

    Nair, R. et al. c-Myc and Her2 cooperate to drive a stem-like phenotype with poor prognosis in breast cancer. Oncogene 33, 3992–4002 (2013).

  61. 61

    Leek, J. T. & Storey, J. D. Capturing heterogeneity in gene expression studies by surrogate variable analysis. PLoS Genet. 3, 1724–1735 (2007).

  62. 62

    Augustine, C. K. et al. Gene expression signatures as a guide to treatment strategies for in-transit metastatic melanoma. Mol. Cancer Ther. 9, 779–790 (2010).

  63. 63

    Boegsted, M. et al. Generation of a predictive melphalan resistance index by drug screen of B-cell cancer cell lines. PLoS ONE 6, e19322 (2011).

  64. 64

    Huang, da, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2009).

  65. 65

    Huang, da, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 1–13 (2009).

  66. 66

    Reich, M. et al. GenePattern 2.0. Nat. Genet. 38, 500–501 (2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Basten and R. Brink for critical reading of the manuscript and D. Rowe (University of Connecticut Health Center) for his kind gift of the pOBCol2.3GFPemd mice. We thank the MLC Flow Facility for cell sorting, the Small Animal Imaging Facility for intravital imaging, the Biological Testing Facility for animal husbandry at the Garvan Institute of Medical Research, and the UNSW Australia, Ramaciotti Centre for Gene Function Analysis for microarry analysis. P.I.C. is funded by Mrs Janice Gibson and the Ernest Heine Family Foundation, T.G.P. by an NHMRC Career Development Fellowship (1005097), M.M.M. by an International Bone and Mineral Society Gregory Mundy Fellowship, P.A.B. by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship and E.V.V. by the FWO-VI and J.M.W.Q. by an NHMRC Project Grant (GNT1057706). This work was supported at least in part by a specialist programme grant from Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research, the OverMyr European Union Framework VII programme, the Cancer Council NSW (726), the Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia and Movember, and the NHMRC (project grant 631484).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.I.C. and T.G.P. conceived the study. M.A.L., M.M.M., N.K., W.-H.K. and J.D. designed and performed experiments, and analysed data. R.L.T., T.N.D., J.P.-H., C.F., E.V.V. and J.A.P. performed experiments. P.A.B., M.J.R., W.K., C.L.E., K.V., A.R.P., J.M.W.Q., E.V.V. and A.Z. analysed and interpreted data. M.M.M., P.I.C. and T.G.P. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tri Giang Phan or Peter I. Croucher.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-2 and Supplementary Tables 1-2 (PDF 1500 kb)

41467_2015_BFncomms9983_MOESM1282_ESM.mov

Tumor cells circulate through bone. Time-lapse images from real-time intravital two-photon microscopy demonstrating a tumor cell circulating through bone at 1 hour post cell injection. 5TGM1-eGFP cell, green; vasculature, red; bone SHG, blue. Left screen lateral xy plane, right screen axial xz plane. Timestamp (hh:mm:ss) starts at 00:00:00 when cells are injected into the tail vein. Scale bar, 20μm. Data is representative of 11 experiments. (MOV 697 kb)

Supplementary Movie 1

Tumor cells circulate through bone. Time-lapse images from real-time intravital two-photon microscopy demonstrating a tumor cell circulating through bone at 1 hour post cell injection. 5TGM1-eGFP cell, green; vasculature, red; bone SHG, blue. Left screen lateral xy plane, right screen axial xz plane. Timestamp (hh:mm:ss) starts at 00:00:00 when cells are injected into the tail vein. Scale bar, 20μm. Data is representative of 11 experiments. (MOV 697 kb)

41467_2015_BFncomms9983_MOESM1283_ESM.mov

Tumor cells colonize bone. Time-lapse images from real-time. intravital two-photon microscopy demonstrating a tumour cell colonising bone within 9 minutes of cell injection. 5TGM1-eGFP cell, green;vasculature, red; bone SHG, blue. Left screen lateral xy plane, right screen axial xz plane. Timestamp (hh:mm:ss) starts at 00:00:00 when cells are injected into the tail vein. Scale bar, 20μm. Data is representative of 11 experiments. (MOV 610 kb)

Supplementary Movie 2

Tumor cells colonize bone. Time-lapse images from real-time. intravital two-photon microscopy demonstrating a tumour cell colonising bone within 9 minutes of cell injection. 5TGM1-eGFP cell, green;vasculature, red; bone SHG, blue. Left screen lateral xy plane, right screen axial xz plane. Timestamp (hh:mm:ss) starts at 00:00:00 when cells are injected into the tail vein. Scale bar, 20μm. Data is representative of 11 experiments. (MOV 610 kb)

41467_2015_BFncomms9983_MOESM1284_ESM.mov

GFP+ DiD+ cells persist adjacent to bone surfaces. Serial zstacks from two-photon imaging of explanted femur 28 days after cell injection. GFP+ DiD+ cells localize to bone surfaces. Bone SHG, blue; GFP+ DiDneg cell, green; GFP+ DiD+ cells, yellow (red/green). Scale bar, 40μm. Data represents at least 10 experiments. (MOV 181 kb)

Supplementary Movie 3

GFP+ DiD+ cells persist adjacent to bone surfaces. Serial zstacks from two-photon imaging of explanted femur 28 days after cell injection. GFP+ DiD+ cells localize to bone surfaces. Bone SHG, blue; GFP+ DiDneg cell, green; GFP+ DiD+ cells, yellow (red/green). Scale bar, 40μm. Data represents at least 10 experiments. (MOV 181 kb)

41467_2015_BFncomms9983_MOESM1285_ESM.mov

GFP+ colonies expand overtime. Maximum intensity projection image in the x, y and z planes of a zstack of the same GFP+ tumor colony at 14 and 20 days imaged using our intravital technique. Bone SHG, blue; GFP+ DiDneg cell, green; GFP+ DiD+ cells, yellow (red/green). (MOV 295 kb)

Supplementary Movie 4

GFP+ colonies expand overtime. Maximum intensity projection image in the x, y and z planes of a zstack of the same GFP+ tumor colony at 14 and 20 days imaged using our intravital technique. Bone SHG, blue; GFP+ DiDneg cell, green; GFP+ DiD+ cells, yellow (red/green). (MOV 295 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lawson, M., McDonald, M., Kovacic, N. et al. Osteoclasts control reactivation of dormant myeloma cells by remodelling the endosteal niche. Nat Commun 6, 8983 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9983

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.