Iguanians are one of the most diverse groups of extant lizards (>1,700 species) with acrodontan iguanians dominating in the Old World, and non-acrodontans in the New World. A new lizard species presented herein is the first acrodontan from South America, indicating acrodontans radiated throughout Gondwana much earlier than previously thought, and that some of the first South American lizards were more closely related to their counterparts in Africa and Asia than to the modern fauna of South America. This suggests both groups of iguanians achieved a worldwide distribution before the final breakup of Pangaea. At some point, non-acrodontans replaced acrodontans and became the only iguanians in the Americas, contrary to what happened on most of the Old World. This discovery also expands the diversity of Cretaceous lizards in South America, which with recent findings, suggests sphenodontians were not the dominant lepidosaurs in that continent as previously hypothesized.
Squamates (lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians) are the most speciose extant group of reptiles, represented by more than 9,000 living species, and iguanians are one of the most diverse group of lizards globally, with more than 1,700 species1. Acrodontan iguanians are characterized by unique jaw features among lizards, as well as an evolutionary trend towards tooth placement at the apex of the jaws and fusion to it (acrodonty and pleuroacrodonty), whereas non-acrodontans (iguanids, tropidurids, among others) are pleurodont, with teeth attached to the lingual wall of the jaws. Among extant taxa, while acrodontans have an Old World distribution, non-acrodontan iguanians dominate the New World, as well as Madagascar and a few Pacific islands2. The origins of these two groups, with their almost disjunct distributions, and the dominance of non-acrodontans in the Americas have been the subject of great conjectures and debate3,4,5,6,7,8. The difficulty in providing answers to these questions is due to a poor fossil record worldwide during the time of origin of squamates (Early-Mid Mesozoic), and during the entire Mesozoic of Gondwana—nine valid species of lizards9, versus ∼150 species in Laurasia (data compiled from7 and several subsequent publications).
Here we report on the first known acrodontan iguanian lizard from South America, the New World component of ancient Gondwana, recovered from a new locality in Brazil dated as Late Cretaceous. This discovery overturns long held hypotheses of the evolution and palaeobiogeography of modern iguanian lizards and provides important insights into the early evolution of lizards in South America.
Squamata Oppel, 1811
Acrodonta Cope, 1864
Gueragama sulamericana gen. et sp. nov.
Etymology. ‘Guera’, meaning ‘ancient’ (native Brazilian Tupi-Guarani); ‘agama’(gender feminine) in reference to agamid lizards; ‘sulamericana’, meaning ‘from South America’ (Portuguese).
Holotype. CP.V 2187, partial lower jaw (Fig. 1), CENPALEO—Universidade do Contestado, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Additional material. CP.V 2188 (unprepared fragments of possible maxillary and teeth).
Type locality and horizon. Cruzeiro do Oeste, Paraná State, Brazil; Goio-Erê Formation, Caiuá Group, Bauru Basin; Turonian-Campanian, Late Cretaceous10.
Diagnosis. Stem acrodontan species separated from all other squamates by the following combination of characters: coronoid process of dentary with dorsal and posteriorly elongate component; posterior process of dentary undivided and extending well beyond level of coronoid process; presence of subdental shelf; dental sulcus present anteriorly; no splenial articulatory facet on dentary (splenial either small or absent); large facet for anteromedial process of coronoid on dentary; angular extending anterior to posteriormost tooth; anterior teeth pleurodont, peg-like, with pointed and laterally compressed apices; posterior marginal teeth: pleuroacrodont, straight, posteriorly increasing in size (except for the last tooth) and labiolingually expanded, increasing degree of ankylosis with subdental shelf and labial wall of dentary posteriorly and with apical wear creating labial and lingual shearing crests; replacement pits lingual to functional tooth.
Description. The preserved dentary has a convex ventral border that is partially broken in its midsection, and bears six mental foramina laterally. The coronoid process would have covered the coronoid eminence laterally, probably reaching to or beyond its posterior margin. In medial view, the anterior tip of the dentary has a horizontally elongate symphysial flat surface that would have butted against its right counterpart, and is barely indented ventrally by the Meckelian canal. The subdental shelf has a medial ridge that diminishes in height posteriorly and which delimits a dental sulcus anteriorly that is not filled with cementum (as opposed to teiids) and is mostly empty. Despite the ventral border of the dentary being broken in its midsection, the ventral crest of the dentary is preserved and visible in medial view ventral to the subdental shelf, anteriorly and posteriorly. It does not extend medially, and does not contact the subdental ridge, even in its deepest part on the anteriormost section of the dentary. This indicates that the Meckelian canal was fully open medially, even in the region where the subdental shelf was deepest. Posterior to the last tooth position there is a large facet for the coronoid anteriomedial process, and posterior and laterally to this, facets for the surangular and angular bones (Fig. 1). Inside the Meckelian canal, the intramandibular septum is not seen posteriorly. There is an excavation on the dorsolateral surface of the dentary, which creates a posterodorsal crest that extends onto the coronoid process, as observed in the extant agamid Uromastyx. There is no facet for the splenial medially on the subdental shelf.
There are 18 tooth positions, with most teeth preserved in situ and displaying moderate heterodonty. The anteriormost five teeth display no obvious ankylosis to the labial wall. However, there is an increasing degree of ankylosis to the labial wall of the dentary and the subdental shelf after the eighth tooth, with the dorsal crest of the dentary eventually becoming indistinguishable from the teeth (Fig. 2d). Posterior teeth are also positioned more dorsally on the jaw relative to anterior teeth, with the labial wall of the dentary (and its dorsal crest) not being visible in dorsal view. Thus, the anteriormost teeth can be classified as pleurodont, and the posterior series as pleuroacrodont. The resorption pits are elliptical, having a wider diameter in the apicobasal axis.
The teeth in the middle and posterior sections of the jaw are straight and closely spaced, whereas the three anteriormost teeth are slightly inclined anteriorly. Resorption pits are observed throughout the dentary, indicating replacement was active. The anterior teeth also have pointed apices that are laterally compressed, forming relatively sharp anterior and posterior ridges. The teeth posterior to the eighth tooth position become gradually different, bearing a sagittaly oriented wear facet at their apices, leaving a labial and a lingual shearing crest and forming a molariform series.
Systematic comparisons to other lepidosaurs
Some features of the jaw of Gueragama, such as a posteriorly elongated coronoid process of the dentary, and an undivided and elongate posterior process, are similar to those found in most rhynchocephalians. However, rhynchocephalians usually have a fully acrodont dentition and show no tooth replacement, making them very distinct from Gueragama. The early rhynchocephalians Gephyrosaurus11 and Diphyodontosaurus12 from the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic of Britain, nevertheless, show pleurodont tooth attachment and pleurodont+acrodont attachment, respectively. Yet, these and all other rhynchocephalians differ from Gueragama and crown acrodontans by having a closed Meckelian fossa, or nearly closed in Gephyrosaurus. Even in the latter condition, the ventral crest of the dentary is curved medially and is also deep anteriorly, as in other rhynchocephalians, unlike Gueragama and crown acrodontans. Gephyrosaurus and Diphyodontosaurus also show the primitive lepidosaurian condition of an elongate jaw with a high tooth count11,12 (reaching up to 40 dentary teeth in Gephyrosaurus13), whereas the jaw in Gueragama and crown acrodontans is much shorter with a lower tooth count. The anterior inferior alveolar foramen is usually located at the level of the coronoid process in rhynchocephalians (or slightly anteriorly in some cases), but it is more anterior in acrodontans14. Gueragama does not have the anterior inferior alveolar foramen at the level of the coronoid and it is inferred to be located well anteriorly (its probable location is covered by matrix and is too fragile for preparation). Finally, Gephyrosaurus and Diphyodontosaurus have an oval symphysis split by the Meckelian canal, and later rhynchocephalians have a vertically elongate symphysis. Gueragama, as in acrodontans (except chamaeleonids), has the symphysis elongated and nearly horizontal, differing from the conditions observed in rhynchocephalians. All these factors indicate Gueragama is not a rhynchocephalian, and is instead, an acrodontan.
Within Squamata, the lack of plicidentine infolding coupled with straight teeth, and the long and undivided posterior process of the dentary, makes Gueragama different from all members of the Anguimorpha. The medially open Meckelian canal also indicates Gueragama is neither a gekkotan nor a xantusiid, which possess a medially closed Meckelian canal via fusion of the dentary subdental shelf to the ventral border of the dentary. An open Meckelian canal is a common feature amongst most lizards classically classified in the ‘Scincomorpha’. However, among scincomorphs, Gueragama differs from teiioids by having a long undivided posterior process of the dentary, a well-developed and dorsally oriented component of the coronoid process and by having an elliptical (wider diameter in the apicobasal axis) rather than semi-circular resorption pits and lacking deep deposits of cementum. From lacertids, it differs by its long posterior and coronoid processes of the dentary. Xantusiids, cordyloids, scincids (including the fossil contogenoids from the Late Cretaceous of North America), as well as some other fossil taxa possibly closely related to them, such as Globaura and Carusia from the Late Cretaceous of East Asia, do have an elongate posterior process of the dentary that is undivided. However, in these groups the posterior process usually differs from the condition observed in Gueragama by being located on the ventral margin of the jaw, at some distance from the coronoid process and the anterior surangular foramen, being separated from them by the surangular. In some forms in these families, this process can be straight (for example, the scincid Tiliqua and contogenoids, as well as the xantusiid Palaeoxantusia from the Eocene of Wyoming and North Dakota). Yet, and most importantly, all these groups differ from Gueragama, by possessing a Meckelian canal that is closed anteriorly (with subdental shelf and ventral crests in contact medially), or totally closed, as in xantusiids; a coronoid process of the dentary that extends mostly dorsally, exposing the coronoid labial process posteriorly to it; anterior and posterior ridges on the lingual side of marginal teeth (for contogenoids); an elongate splenial (apart from xantusiids); and having tall chisel-like teeth, usually with crown striations (mostly in scincids). Gueragama also differs from the Late Cretaceous borioteiioids by having a posteriorly elongate coronoid process (much shorter in borioteiioids), the elongate posterior process of the dentary (very reduced in borioteiioids) and a reduced/absent splenial (elongate in borioteiioids).
Gueragama sulamericana shares with iguanian lizards a subdental shelf, closely spaced teeth, and the replacement teeth positioned lingually. Whereas some families of iguanians have a closed Meckelian canal, the new species possesses an open Meckelian canal, which is also the case for acrodontans, and some species of Oplurus, and Phrynosoma, for instance. The new species shares with acrodontan lizards numerous other features (see Table 1) such as an undivided and straight posterior process of the dentary, separated from the coronoid process by a small gap through which the anterior surangular foramen opened; a coronoid process with an elongate posterior component, which covers the lateral surface of the coronoid bone; a dorsolateral excavation on the labial margin of the dentary, producing a posterodorsal crest connecting it to the coronoid process; splenial either small or absent; an anteriorly elongate angular facet on the dentary, indicating that element extended anteriorly to the posteriormost teeth. When compared with all fossil and extant squamates, the combination of these features is observed only in acrodontan lizards (Figs 1 and 2). The new taxon is most similar to the basal acrodontan group Leiolepidinae, especially Uromastyx, including the morphology of the coronoid process that is subdivided into a dorsal and a posterior elongate component in Uromastyx (Fig. 2; Table 1).
Comparative anatomy of acrodontans and priscagamids
Crown acrodontans and the Priscagamidae, from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia15, form a monophyletic group according to most authors15,16,17,18,19. The dentition of G. sulamericana is more similar to primitive priscagamids by having its posterior teeth predominantly placed on the medial side of the jaw. For instance, Pleurodontagama15,20, Flaviagama and Mimeosaurus tugrikinesis16 have an exclusively pleurodont dentition, as does Ctenomastax21, a putative sister taxon to priscagamids+acrodontans18. Priscagama had both pleurodont and acrodont teeth posteriorly. Among acrodontans, transitional dentitions that are still not fully acrodont occur in Eocene species from Mongolia, such as Khaichinsaurus and Lentisaurus22, as well as a few modern forms (for example, Uromastyx and Calotes23). The tooth attachment modes in these taxa suggest acrodonty could have evolved as a derived condition within Iguania, and that the priscagamids (and some acrodontans) represent transitional forms evolving towards that dental condition20. In the priscagamids Pleurodontagama and Morunasius, some resorption pits indicating tooth replacement are also retained20.
G. sulamericana displays an increasing degree of dental ankylosis of the posterior teeth, the lack of it in the anteriormost teeth, and the presence of a dental sulcus as in Priscagama and Pleurodontagama15,20. Tooth replacement is still present, as in Pleurodontagama and Morunasius. Furthermore, the variation in tooth placement on the jaw of G. sulamericana is also seen in priscagamids and acrodontans. G. sulamericana also displays close packing of the teeth, which resembles the primitive iguanian condition, as observed in Ctenomastax. However, G. sulamericana preserves 18 teeth, differing from the higher number of teeth in non-acrodontan iguanian dentaries (20–35), and matching the tooth count of acrodontans and some priscagamids, which varies between 15 and 20 (ref. 24). Thus, Gueragama displays unique lower jaw features of acrodontans as well as their tooth count, but still bears dental characteristics of other iguanians that are also retained in priscagamids.
We inferred the phylogenetic position of G. sulamericana in a data set representative of all major squamate groups18 (see Methods and Supplementary Data 1), and obtained a well resolved strict consensus tree topology and an unambiguous placement for the new taxon (Fig. 3a). Gueragama was found as a stem acrodontan, being more closely related to crown acrodontans than to the Priscagamidae and Ctenomastax. Gueragama breaks the long branch between priscagamids and acrodontans found a previous analysis18, providing clues for character evolution along the stem lineage of Acrodonta.
Despite the limited number of characters that could be scored for Gueragama in this character matrix, taxon incompleteness should not be an a priori criterion for not including a taxon in a phylogenetic analysis. Retrieving an unambiguous positioning for a taxon with few scorable characters, and good resolution for the entire tree, depends on the taxon possessing the key synapomorphies that are necessary for its correct placement25,26, and this cannot be predicted before the analysis27. The inclusion of Gueragama in the matrix of Gauthier et al.18 supports this hypothesis. Gueragama was found within the clade formed by Ctenomastax, along with priscagamids and acrodonts, within the acrodontan clade, but outside of the crown, supporting the transitional position for this taxon.
In a preliminary analysis without the inclusion of Gueragama, the branch between priscagamids and extant acrodontans was 18 steps long. The inclusion of Gueragama broke this relatively long branch leading to the acrodontan crown clade into two shorter branches: one of three steps (subtending Gueragama and crown acrodontans) and another of three steps (subtending the crown clade)—Supplementary Note 1. The inclusion of this fossil form does not change the relationship between major clades of squamates obtained before its inclusion, but helps to understand the sequence of character evolution leading to the evolution of the peculiar jaw and teeth features that characterize acrodontans amongst all other squamates. Furthermore, breaking long branches makes the overall analysis more accurate, as biases due to long-branch attraction are diminished. The long branch obtained by Gauthier et al.18 for the chamaeleonids (Chamaeleo and Brookesia) was also inferred from the present analysis. This configuration is expected given the high degree of morphological specialization of the members of this clade in relation to its sister taxa, and the absence of intermediate fossil forms representing the transition to that morphotype. It is likely, given the ancestry of the clade Acrodonta (back into the Jurassic14), the lack of intermediate fossils leading to crown chamaeleonids and the paucity of African and Malagasy fossils, that this long branch will be broken by the discovery of stem chamaeleonids, as has occurred for acrodontans after the inclusion of Gueragama. Whether stem chamaeleonids first diversified in Madagascar, Africa or other regions may not affect current ideas on the origin of the modern fauna. Crown chamaeleonids (that have been estimated to have originated in Madagascar4) may be the last survivors of a previously more diverse chamaeleonid total clade, the origin of which is still unknown.
G. sulamericana lived in an arid to desert environment, the Caiuá desert belonging to the Bauru Group in Southeastern/Southern Brazil during the Late Cretaceous. Ichnofossils of large dinosaurs are known from the central areas of that desert, indicating that large animals were able to survive there. This was probably due to seasonal water availability and the interdune wetland characteristics of the Goio-Erê Formation28. The Goio-Erê oasis probably supported some plant life, though plant fossils are still unknown. Pterosaurs were also abundant in that region, represented by hundreds of bones of the tapejarid Caiuajara dobruskii that have been found in the same locality as Gueragama10 (Fig. 4). Like modern agamid lizards living in arid regions, Gueragama probably lived in burrows to avoid extreme temperatures during at least part of the day.
G. sulamericana provides fundamental insights on the acquisition of the peculiar lower jaw and tooth morphologies of modern acrodontans. Tooth ankylosis in the early branching priscagamids with pleurodont tooth attachment, and in G. sulamericana with pleurodont and pleuroacrodont attachment, indicates that ankylosis evolved before the dorsal placement of the posterior teeth that is characteristic of the dentition of modern agamids and chamaeleonids. In fact, Uromastyx and some other agamids also have a dorsomedial, rather than a strictly dorsal (for example, chamaeleonids), placement of the posterior teeth on the lower jaw, despite full ankylosis of the posterior adult teeth. The position of Priscagama as an early branching priscagamid in previous works18,19 also suggests that fully acrodont attachment evolved independently within the priscagamids and acrodontans, now further supported by G. sulamericana. Furthermore, Uromastyx, a later branching agamid, possesses an anteromedial projection of the dentary, which seems to be the remnant of a subdental shelf (Fig. 2), still present in G. sulamericana. The strong apical wear facets that create a sagittal groove in G. sulamericana are unusual for extant acrodontans, which usually possess this feature on the labial surface of the dentary29. However, a similar wear pattern has recently been identified in an Oligocene specimen that represents the oldest known acrodontan from Africa, and which also shares many features with Uromastyx30.
The oldest known acrodontans are from the Early-Middle Jurassic of India14. Furthermore, morphological phylogenetic data suggests Iguania (including acrodontans) and Scleroglossa separated before the breakup of Pangea7, which would explain the worldwide distribution reported for non-acrodontan iguanians by the Late Cretaceous7,21,31. Gueragama indicates that a worldwide distribution was also achieved by acrodontan lizards by the Late Cretaceous, occurring not only in East Gondwana and East Laurasia, but also reaching West Gondwana during the Mesozoic. This reinforces the idea of an early radiation and wide distribution for all iguanians, and also implies that the acrodontan presence in Africa could be much older than the current oldest record30. Finally, Gueragama indicates that acrodontan dispersal through Gondwanan continents first occurred before the final breakup of Gondwana, and not by later dispersal events, thus contradicting previous hypotheses6,8. Therefore, it becomes clear that iguanians underwent a worldwide radiation in the Mesozoic. Whether the modern distribution of these faunas is a result of this early radiation, with subsequent extinction in some areas (for example, acrodontans in South America), or the result of subsequent Cenozoic dispersal, remains to be established. However, our findings, along with previous ones4,5, suggest both factors were important.
It is clear that at some point in time, a diverse non-acrodontan iguanian fauna eventually replaced Gueragama and other potential acrodontans in South America. These two large groups of iguanians may well have come into contact during the Late Cretaceous in South America32,33, similar to what occurred in East Asia for non-acrodontans and priscagamids during this same time period15,21. Acrodontan and non-acrodontan iguanians share very similar ecologies2 and their current almost exclusively non-overlapping distributions worldwide suggest competitive exclusion as a possible explanation for their current distributions. Alternatively, the Late Cretaceous extinction event could have paved the way for non-acrodontan iguanian dominance in South America.
Gueragama also suggests a new scenario for early acrodontan radiation, never considered before: that the stem acrodontan lineage could have evolved in West Gondwana, rather than in East Gondwana. Whether acrodontans originated in, or radiated into South America during the Mesozoic, is still unclear. Further sampling from both South America and other Gondwanan localities are necessary to appropriately address this question. Yet, Gueragama does indicate that at least some of the oldest known lizards in South America include species that are more closely related to the extant fauna of Old World continents, rather than to the modern fauna of South America.
In spite of limited knowledge of the squamate fossil record in South America, new finds are continuing to expand our understanding of squamate evolution in South America, especially in Brazil9,32,34 and Argentina35,36. The diversity of lizards in the Cretaceous of South America is higher than previously thought, and is not dominated by sphenodontians as was previously suggested for that time period37. Rather, the previous lack of lizard records seems to have been a collection bias from southern latitudes in South America. The current pattern of distribution suggests that different major lizard groups were already present in Northeastern and Southern Brazil (this work and9,32,33), where no sphenodontians are currently known (Fig. 3b), while sphenodontians were still abundant, but apparently restricted to more southern latitudes (Southernmost Brazil and Argentina).
To phylogenetically infer the systematic position of G. sulamericana among squamates, we included it into the data matrix of Gauthier et al.18 with the taxon scoring corrections performed by Simões et al.9. The search parameters involved the New Technology algorithms implemented in T.N.T.40, as these are the more appropriate ones for retrieving trees from the largest number of possible local optima for data matrices larger than 100 taxa. The algorithms used were Sectorial Search, Ratchet and Tree Fusing, followed by a traditional heuristic search using the protocol performed by Simões et al.9. This method allowed us to obtain shorter most parsimonious trees and in larger numbers than the original run by Gauthier et al.18. During this process, additional incorrect character-state scores were identified for some taxa, and corrections were made:
Ch. 367—Zonosaurus, which was used by Gauthier et al.18 as an example for character-state 367 (2), as well as other cordylids and xantusiids, was mistakenly scored with state 367 (1) and thus rescored herein as 367 (2). Despite illustrating Trogonophis with character-state 367 (3), this and most other amphisbaenians were scored as either ‘0’ or ‘1’. Because characters-states ‘1’ and ‘2’ differ in the topography of the coronoid process, and ‘2’ and ‘3’ in its degree of development, we scored amphisbaenians according to the topography of that process (either ‘1’ or ‘2’). Character-state ‘3’ should be treated under a separate character if one desires to code for degree of development, and rescored for all taxa, but this extra character seems to have intermediate states that prevent its scoring without creating arbitrary and biased categories. Thus, we did not attempt to create this extra character.
Primitively, in Sphenodon and other rhynchocephalians, the dentary bears a posterodorsal coronoid process and a more ventrally placed posterior process41 with the former lying above the level of the mandibular foramen and the latter beneath it. Such a division between a posterodorsal coronoid process and a posterior process is also present in the basalmost rhynchocephalians Gephyrosaurus11 and in the early squamate Huehuecuetzpalli. That posterior process in squamates is also located ventral to a mandibular foramen, the anterior surangular foramen. Within squamates, it is common for the posterior process to become divided into a dorsal surangular process, and a more ventral angular process, with both usually lying ventral to the anterior surangular foramen41,42. Thus, the topography of the posterior process(es) relative to the mandibular/surangular foramen is generally conservative, and it is an important topography marker to establish the primary homology of these processes based on similarity. Acrodontans have a coronoid process covering the base of the coronoid bone, above the anterior surangular foramen, and a single undivided posterior process ventral to that foramen, similar to rhynchocephalians and to other lepidosaurians, as previously recognized by Borsuk-Bialynicka42 and Evans et al.14. However, Gauthier et al.18 scored acrodontans with state 367 (0), as if they lacked a coronoid process. Thus, we rescored their state from ‘0’ to ‘2’.
Character 367 was also treated as ordered in the character description, but in the character assumption in the data matrix it was treated as unordered by Gauthier et al.18. We maintained this character as unordered. All the forementioned changes are summarized as follows: 1→2: Tepexisaurus tepexii, Cricosaura typica, Lepidophyma flavimaculatum, Palaeoxantusia sp., Xantusia vigilis, Platysaurus imperator, Cordylus mossambicus, Zonosaurus ornatus, Cordylosaurus subtesselatus, Myrmecodaptria microphagosa, Carusia intermedia, Globaura venusta, Eoxanta lacertifrons, Bipes canaliculatus; Bipes biporus; Geocalamus acutus; Amphisbaena fuliginosa, 0→2: Sphenodon punctatus, Kallimodon pulchellus, Gephyrosaurus bridensis, Huehuecuetzpalli mixtecus, Leiolepis belliana, Uromastyx aegyptius, Brookesia brygooi, Chamaeleo laevigatus, Physignathus cocincinus, Agama agama, Calotes emma, Pogona vitticeps, Adamisaurus magnidentatus, Polyglyphanodon sternbergi; 0→?: Gobinatus arenosus; 1→?: Hymenosaurus clarki; 0→1: Spathorhynchus fossorium, Dyticonastis rensbergeri, Rhineura floridana.
Ch. 369—The posterior termination of the dentary in some acrodontan taxa is clearly posterior to the level of the coronoid apex, as illustrated for Leiocephalus for character-state 369(2). Thus, we rescored these taxa: 1→2: Uromastyx aegyptius, Brookesia brygooi, Chamaeleo laevigatus, Physignathus cocincinus, Agama agama.
Ch. 372—Gephyrosaurus and Sphenodon were scored as having an open Meckelian canal medially [372(0)], as seen among acrodontans. However, Gephyrosaurus was described11 as having the ventral margin of the canal contacting the dorsal tooth-bearing portion, closing the canal, but not fusing. Thus, this taxon needs to be scored with character-state 372(2). The same is observed in Sphenodon.
This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the proposed online registration system for the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the Life Science Identifier to the prefix ‘ http://zoobank.org/’. The LSIDs for this publication are: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:428CA59D-1BA3-4A29-914D-5D0D29FE4CCD; urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:1D135173-7E42-47E1-8A70-4ABEA9D677FD.
How to cite this article: Simões, T. R. et al. A stem acrodontan lizard in the Cretaceous of Brazil revises early lizard evolution in Gondwana. Nat. Commun. 6:8149 doi: 10.1038/ncomms9149 (2015).
Uetz, P. & Hošek, J. The reptile database http://www.reptile-database.org (2014).
Pianka, E. R. & Vitt, L. J. Lizards: Windows to the Evolution of Diversity University of California Press (2003).
Estes, R. in Studies in Herpetology and Evolutionary Biology. Essays in Honor of Ernest Edward Williams eds Rhodin A., Miyata K. 365–398Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University (1983).
Raxworthy, C. J., Forstner, M. R. J. & Nussbaum, R. A. Chameleon radiation by oceanic dispersal. Nature 415, 784–787 (2002).
Macey, J. R. et al. Evaluating trans-tethys migration: an example using acrodont lizard phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49, 233–256 (2000).
Moody, S. M. Phylogenetic and Historical Biogeographical Relationships of the Genera in The Family Agamidae (Reptilia: Lacertilia) PhD thesis Univ. Michigan (1980).
Evans, S. E. At the feet of the dinosaurs: the early history and radiation of lizards. Biol. Rev. 78, 513–551 (2003).
Honda, M. et al. Phylogenetic relationships of the family Agamidae (Reptilia: Iguania) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Zool. Sci. 17, 527–537 (2000).
Simões, T. R., Caldwell, M. W. & Kellner, A. W. A. A new Early Cretaceous lizard species from Brazil, and the phylogenetic position of the oldest known South American squamates. J. Syst. Palaeont. 601–614 doi:10.1080/14772019.14772014.14947342 (2014).
Manzig, P. C. et al. Discovery of a rare pterosaur bone bed in a Cretaceous desert with insights on ontogeny and behavior of flying reptiles. PLoS ONE 9, e100005 (2014).
Evans, S. E. The skull of a new eosuchian reptile from the Lower Jurassic of South Wales. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 70, 203–264 (1980).
Whiteside, D. I. The head skeleton of the Rhaetian sphenodontid Diphydontosaurus avonis gen. et sp. nov. and the modernizing of a living fossil. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 312, 379–430 (1986).
Evans, S. E. Tooth replacement in the Lower Jurassic lepidosaur Gephyrosaurus bridensis. Neues Jahrb. Geol. Palaontol. Monatsh 7, 411–420 (1985).
Evans, S. E., Prasad, G. V. R. & Manhas, B. K. Fossil lizards from the Jurassic Kota Formation of India. J. Vert. Paleontol. 22, 299–312 (2002).
Borsuk-Bialynicka, M. & Moody, S. M. Priscagaminae. A new subfamily of the Agamidae (Sauria) from the Late Cretaceous of the Gobi Desert. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 29, 51–81 (1984).
Alifanov, V. New Priscagamida (Lacertilia) from the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia and their systematic position among Iguania. Paleontol. J. 4, 68–80 (1989).
Frost, D. R. & Etheridge, R. A phylogenetic analysis and taxonomy of iguanian lizards (Reptilia: Squamata). Univ. Kansas Nat. Hist. Mus. Misc. Pub 81, 1–65 (1989).
Gauthier, J. A., Kearney, M., Maisano, J. A., Rieppel, O. & Behlke, A. D. B. Assembling the squamate tree of life: perspectives from the phenotype and the fossil record. Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist 53, 3–308 (2012).
Conrad, J. L. Phylogeny and systematics of Squamata (Reptilia) based on morphology. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 310, 1–182 (2008).
Borsuk-Bialynicka, M. The Late Cretaceous lizard Pleurodontagama and the origin of tooth permanency in Lepidosauria. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 41, 231–252 (1996).
Gao, K. & Norell, M. A. Taxonomic composition and systematics of Late Cretaceous lizard assemblages from Ukhaa Tolgod and adjacent localities, Mongolian Gobi Desert. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 249, 1–118 (2000).
Alifanov, V. R. New acrodont lizards (Lacertilia) from the middle Eocene of southern Mongolia. Paleontol. J. 43, 675–685 (2009).
Budney, L. A. A Survey of Tooth Attachment Histology in Squamata: The Evaluation of Tooth Attachment Classifications and Characters (MSc thesis, Univ. Alberta (2004).
Edmund, A. G. in Biology of the Reptilia eds Gans C., d’A Bellairs A., Parsons T. S. 117–200Academic Press (1969).
Wiens, J. J. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 52, 528–538 (2003).
Wiens, J. J. Missing data and the design of phylogenetic analyses. J. Biomed. Inf 39, 34–42 (2006).
Kearney, M. Fragmentary taxa, missing data, and ambiguity: mistaken assumptions and conclusions. Syst. Biol. 51, 369–381 (2002).
Fernandes, L. et al. in Sítios geológicos e paleontológicos do Brasil (ed Manfredo Winge) 1–11CPRM (2009).
Cooper, J. S. & Poole, D. F. G. The dentition and dental tissues of the agamid lizard. Uromastyx. J. Zool. 169, 85–100 (1973).
Holmes, R. B., Murray, A. M., Chatrath, P., Attia, Y. S. & Simons, E. L. Agamid lizard (Agamidae: Uromastycinae) from the lower Oligocene of Egypt. Hist. Biol 22, 215–223 (2009).
Gao, K. & Fox, R. C. Taxonomy and evolution of Late Cretaceous lizards (Reptilia: Squamata) from western Canada. Bull. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist 33, 1–107 (1996).
Nava, W. R. & Martinelli, A. G. A new squamate lizard from the Upper Cretaceous Adamantina Formation (Bauru Group), São Paulo state, Brazil. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 83, 291–299 (2011).
Estes, R. & Price, L. I. Iguanid lizard from the Upper Cretaceous of Brazil. Science 180, 748–751 (1973).
Hsiou, A. S., Albino, A. M., Medeiros, M. A. & Santos, R. A. B. The oldest Brazilian snakes from the Cenomanian (early Late Cretaceous). Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 59, 635–642 (2014).
Brizuela, S. & Albino, A. M. A scincomorph lizard from the Campanian of Patagonia. Cretaceous Res. 32, 781–785 (2011).
Apesteguía, S. & Zaher, H. A cretaceous terrestrial snake with robust hindlimbs and a sacrum. Nature 440, 1037–1040 (2006).
Apesteguia, S. & Novas, F. E. Large Cretaceous sphenodontian from Patagonia provides insight into lepidosaur evolution in Gondwana. Nature 425, 609–612 (2003).
Rage, J. C. & Augé, M. Squamate reptiles from the middle Eocene of Lissieu (France). A landmark in the middle Eocene of Europe. Geobios 43, 253–268 (2010).
Klembara, J., Böhme, M. & Rummel, M. Revision of the anguine lizard Pseudopus laurillardi (Squamata, Anguidae) from the Miocene of Europe, with comments on paleoecology. J. Paleontol. 84, 159–196 (2010).
Goloboff, P. A., Farris, J. S. & Nixon, K. C. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics. 24, 774–786 (2008).
Evans, S. E. in Biology of the Reptilia—The Skull of Lepidosauria eds Gans Carl, Gaunt Abbot, Adler Kraig 1–347Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles (2008).
Borsuk-Bialynicka, M. Globaura venusta gen. et sp. n. and Eoxanta lacertifrons gen. et sp. n.—non-teiid lacertoids from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 33, 211–248 (1988).
We are indebted to Helder de Paula, Andreea Mohora and Adriano Kury for technical assistance during preparation of the material and production of the manuscript. We thank Jonathan Losos and Jose Rosado (Museum of Comparative Zoology—Harvard University) for access to comparative material. We thank the Willi Hennig Society for the free availability of the software T.N.T., Ron Blakey, Colorado Plateau Geosystems for the paleomap, the Vanier CGS for scholarship to T.R.S., funding support from NSERC to M.W.C. (Discovery Grant no. 238458), as well as CNPq (grant no. 304780/2013-8) and FAPERJ (grant no. E-26/102737/2012) funding to A.W.A.K.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Simões, T., Wilner, E., Caldwell, M. et al. A stem acrodontan lizard in the Cretaceous of Brazil revises early lizard evolution in Gondwana. Nat Commun 6, 8149 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9149
A new toothless pterosaur (Pterodactyloidea) from Southern Brazil with insights into the paleoecology of a Cretaceous desert
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2019)
The alternative regenerative strategy of bearded dragon unveils the key processes underlying vertebrate tooth renewal
Scientific Reports (2019)
The first known fossil Uma: ecological evolution and the origins of North American fringe-toed lizards
BMC Evolutionary Biology (2019)
Frontiers in Physiology (2018)