Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

DNA/RNA heteroduplex oligonucleotide for highly efficient gene silencing

Abstract

Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are recognized therapeutic agents for the modulation of specific genes at the post-transcriptional level. Similar to any medical drugs, there are opportunities to improve their efficacy and safety. Here we develop a short DNA/RNA heteroduplex oligonucleotide (HDO) with a structure different from double-stranded RNA used for short interfering RNA and single-stranded DNA used for ASO. A DNA/locked nucleotide acid gapmer duplex with an α-tocopherol-conjugated complementary RNA (Toc-HDO) is significantly more potent at reducing the expression of the targeted mRNA in liver compared with the parent single-stranded gapmer ASO. Toc-HDO also improves the phenotype in disease models more effectively. In addition, the high potency of Toc-HDO results in a reduction of liver dysfunction observed in the parent ASO at a similar silencing effect. HDO technology offers a novel concept of therapeutic oligonucleotides, and the development of this molecular design opens a new therapeutic field.

Introduction

Two major types of oligonucleotide drugs are currently being developed as therapeutic platforms for the reduction of target gene expression: short interfering RNA (siRNA) and RNase H-dependent single-stranded antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs)1,2,3,4,5,6,7. The use of RNA interference is a promising therapeutic strategy, but the double-stranded RNAs appear to be less efficient in distribution to tissues and in cellular uptake compared with single-stranded ASOs. To address this issue, siRNAs are often formulated into polymers, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) or conjugated to targeting ligands including lipid or ligands of cell surface receptors8,9,10,11,12. Several formulated siRNAs are now in clinical trials, which will define the safety and efficacy of these agents12,13. Single-stranded ASOs have demonstrated distribution to tissues and cellular uptake in the absence of formulations or targeting ligands. There are multiple mechanisms by which single-stranded ASOs can be used to affect the processing and metabolism of the target RNA, including degradation of the target RNA via the recruitment of endogenous ribonuclease (RNase) H1 (refs 14, 15). Chemical modifications, particularly the use of locked nucleic acid (LNA)16,17,18, 2′-O-methoxyethyl RNA (2′-MOE)19,20 and 2′,4′-constrained 2′-O-ethyl bridged nucleic acid (cEt)21,22 on the ends of the ASO markedly improve ASO binding affinity for the target messenger RNA (mRNA), resulting in increased activity. Kynamro (Mipomersen), a second-generation ASO-targeting Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) mRNA, was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia6,7. In addition, high-affinity chemical modifications enable the design of short ASOs that possess good potency compared with longer oligonucleotides23.

Despite progress in the design of new chemical modifications of oligonucleotides, methods that further improve the potency of oligonucleotide drugs and improve safety and tolerability are highly desirable. The insufficient delivery, poor cellular uptake of ASOs and their inefficient access to target RNA are major impediments to in vivo silencing24. Previously, we conjugated α-tocopherol, a natural isomer of vitamin E, to siRNA and obtained increased delivery of siRNA in mouse liver and brain25,26. We tried to introduce α-tocopherol directly into single-stranded ASOs as a delivery system for ASOs. However, we found that the chemical method for conjugation to oligonucleotides was critical, as lipid needed to be released from the oligonucleotide to allow the oligonucleotide to traffic to the target mRNA27.

Here we describe the novel observation that heteroduplex oligonucleotide (HDO) consisting of a DNA/LNA gapmer and its complementary RNA (cRNA) conjugated to a lipid enhances the activity of the gapmer ASO. Lipids, including α-tocopherol, can be covalently bound to the RNA strand of HDO. The RNA strand is cleaved in cells and tissues by a nuclease releasing the single-stranded ASO in the target cells, allowing it to bind to the targeted RNA. We demonstrate enhanced potency and better tolerability of α-tocopherol-conjugated HDO (Toc-HDO) in comparison with parent single-stranded ASO.

Results

Structure of the Toc-HDO

We designed a Toc-HDO (Fig. 1a). The DNA strand is composed of gapmer ASO in which 8–10 DNA oligonucleotides are flanked by 2–3 LNA oligonucleotides, and all internucleotide linkages were modified by phosphorothioate substitution. The RNA strand is complementary to the DNA strand (cRNA), and it is bound to α-tocopherol on the 5′-end. In the RNA strand, phosphorothioate-modified 2′-O-methyl RNA is used for the nucleotides complementary to LNA in the DNA strand for protection from exonucleases, whereas the nucleotides in the centre portion complementary to the DNA are unmodified natural RNAs.

Figure 1: Design and effects of Toc-HDO.
figure 1

(a) Schematic illustration of the construction of ASO, Toc-ASO and Toc-HDO. (b,c) The effects of Toc-HDO on ApoB mRNA levels in mouse liver 3 d after injection by qRT–PCR analyses. (b) After injection of 0.75 mg kg−1 ASO, HDO or Toc-HDO-targeting ApoB, shuffle sequence of Toc-HDO-targeting ApoB or Toc-HDO targeting an unrelated gene (n=3, mean values±s.e.m., *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus PBS). (c) After injection of a different length of 0.75 mg kg−1 ASO or Toc-HDO-targeting ApoB (n=3, mean values±s.e.m., **P<0.01 versus PBS). (d) The effects of Toc-ASO on ApoB mRNA levels in mouse liver 3 d after injection of 0.75 or 3 mg kg−1 ASO- or Toc-ASO-targeting ApoB by qRT–PCR analyses (n=3, mean values±s.e.m., **P<0.01 versus PBS). Data are representative of at least three independent experiments each (bd). P values were calculated from the Student’s two-tailed t-test (bd).

Silencing efficacy of the Toc-HDO in mice

When Toc-HDO-targeting endogenous mouse ApoB mRNA (0.75 mg kg−1) was intravenously injected into mice, it produced a greater reduction of ApoB mRNA (95%) compared with an equivalent dose of the parent ASO without α-tocopherol (Fig. 1b). A similar finding was observed using a different ASO-targeting ApoB mRNA (Supplementary Fig. 1). The Toc-HDO in which the sequence of the ASO was scrambled or the Toc-HDO that targeted an unrelated gene did not reduce ApoB mRNA levels (Fig. 1b). The effect of ASO length was studied by varying the length of the ASO from 12 to 16 nucleotides (melting temperatures are shown in Supplementary Table 1). As previously reported23, 12- and 13-mer LNA-modified ASOs were effective at reducing ApoB mRNA, with activity decreasing with 14- and 16-mers (Fig. 1c). The most effective length for the duplexed HDO was 13 nucleotides, although the 12- and 14-mer HDO also showed good activity. Similar to the single-stranded ASO, the HDO complex containing a 16-nucleotide ASO was significantly less active (Fig. 1c). The α-tocopherol-conjugated cRNA (Toc-cRNA) alone did not significantly decrease ApoB mRNA levels even at a high dose of 6 mg kg−1 (Supplementary Fig. 2). The direct conjugation of α-tocopherol to single-stranded ASO (Toc-ASO) (Fig. 1a) abolished the in vivo effect of the gapmer ASO even at a dose of 3 mg kg−1 (Fig. 1d).

After injection, the reduction of ApoB mRNA in the liver was maximal on day 3, and it lasted for >1 month (Fig. 2a). The Toc-HDO (effective dose; ED50, 0.038 mg kg−1; Fig. 2b) was 22.2 times more potent than the single-stranded ASO (ED50, 0.841 mg kg−1; Fig. 2c). In addition to lowering ApoB mRNA, the Toc-HDO was more potent in reducing serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (Fig. 2d), and the pharmacological effects lasted for >1 month for an injection dose of 0.75 mg kg−1 Toc-HDO (Supplementary Fig. 3).

Figure 2: Duration of gene silencing and dose-dependent reduction by ASO and Toc-HDO-targeting ApoB mRNA.
figure 2

(a) qRT–PCR analyses showing ApoB mRNA levels in liver assayed at the indicated time points after injection of 0.75 mg kg−1 ASO, Toc-HDO or PBS alone. Data are expressed as mean values±s.e.m. (n=3, *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus PBS). (b,c) Dose-dependent reduction of gene silencing after injection of Toc-HDO (b) or ASO (c) (n=3, mean values±s.e.m., **P<0.01). (d) Serum LDL cholesterol levels 3 d after injection of ASO, Toc-HDO or PBS alone. Data are expressed as mean values±s.e.m. (n=3, **P<0.01 versus PBS). Data are representative of at least three independent experiments each. P values were calculated from the Student’s two-tailed t-test (a) or the Jonckheere–Terpstra test (bd).

A significant improvement in activity was also observed when targeting another gene, scavenger receptor class B member 1 (Srb1) gene, in the liver (Fig. 3a,b). Furthermore, the Toc-HDO using 2′-MOE or cEt instead of LNA in the wing portion of the DNA strand also showed a similarly enhanced potency (Fig. 3c,d) for reduction of Srb1 mRNA.

Figure 3: Gene-silencing effect with Toc-HDO targeting scavenger receptor class B member 1 (Srb1) in the liver.
figure 3

(a) qRT–PCR analysis showing Srb1 mRNA levels in liver assayed 3 d after injection of ASO or Toc-HDO-targeting Srb1, shuffle sequence of Toc-HDO-targeting Srb1 or PBS alone. Data are expressed as mean values±s.e.m. (n=3, **P<0.01 versus PBS). (b) Western blot analysis of Srb1 protein in livers from three mice 7 d after injection of 6 mg kg−1 Toc-HDO-targeting Srb1 mRNA. (c) qRT–PCR analyses showing Srb1 mRNA levels in liver assayed 3 d after injection of DNA/2′-MOE gapmer ASO, Toc-HDO or PBS alone. Data are expressed as mean values±s.e.m. (n=4, **P<0.01 versus PBS). (d) qRT–PCR analyses showing Srb1 mRNA levels in liver assayed 3 d after injection of mice with DNA/cEt gapmer ASO, Toc-HDO or PBS alone. Data are expressed as mean values±s.e.m. (n=4, **P<0.01 versus PBS). Data are representative of at least three independent experiments each (a,c,d). P values were calculated from the Student’s two-tailed t-test (a,c,d).

Adverse effects of Toc-HDO

To evaluate the adverse effects of Toc-HDO, we performed repeated daily injections of the same dose (1 mg kg−1) of ASO or Toc-HDO for 4 consecutive days; we found a mild liver dysfunction as determined by elevated serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase levels in ASO-injected mice compared with Toc-HDO-injected mice at the same doses (Supplementary Table 2). On routine histological analysis by haematoxylin–eosin staining of the liver tissues, there was no necrotic change of the hepatocytes or inflammatory changes (Supplementary Table 3). We performed another experiment in which the administered dose was adjusted to the same silencing effect at ED50 or ED95 level in ASO-injected and Toc-HDO-injected mice (Table 1). In Toc-HDO-injected mice, we found a statistically significant decrease of liver dysfunction (ALT level) observed in the parent ASO-injected mice both at ED50 and ED95 levels, probably because of the reduction of the administered dose of the nucleotide. Hepatic lipid accumulation, a known adverse effect caused by targeting ApoB mRNA, which was observed in Toc-HDO-injected mouse liver, was consistent with ApoB lowering (Supplementary Fig. 4). These results indicated that Toc-HDO with the same silencing effect as ASO had a less adverse effect on liver toxicity. To estimate the immune-stimulatory adverse events by administration of Toc-HDO, the levels of induction of pro-inflammatory cytokine, interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were examined after injection of Toc-HDO. No increase of IFN-γ and TNF-α levels was detected in the serum (Table 1).

Table 1 Levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α, AST, ALT and T-Bil in mouse serum after administration of PBS alone, ASO or Toc-HDO.

To address the specificity of the Toc-HDO complex, we performed microarray analysis of liver samples from mice injected with 0.75 mg kg−1 Toc-HDO and 6 mg kg−1 single-stranded ASO, doses designed to produce 95% reduction of ApoB mRNA. We identified 11 off-target genes with ≥84% identity to the DNA strand that were downregulated by >50% (ref. 28) in samples from Toc-HDO-injected mice (Table 2). In mice injected with the single-stranded ASO, we detected six additional genes that were downregulated by >50% (Table 2). Importantly, there was no additional off-target gene which was downregulated by >60% in Toc-HDO-injected mice relative to ASO-injected mice, suggesting that Toc-HDO did not exacerbate the effects on off-target genes compared with the parent ASO.

Table 2 Profiling of on-target (Apob) and off-target genes with expression reduced >50% in microarray analyses of mice injected with ASO or Toc-HDO.

Gene-silencing effect of Toc-HDO in a mouse disease model

As a mouse disease model, hypercholesterolaemic mice, produced by feeding a high-fat synthetic diet, were treated with weekly repeated doses of ASO or Toc-HDO-targeting ApoB mRNA (0.75 or 0.09 mg kg−1 per week) for 1 month. An almost 80% reduction of ApoB mRNA in the liver (Fig. 4a) and >50% reduction in serum LDL cholesterol levels (Fig. 4b) were achieved with both the Toc-HDO and single-stranded ASOs at the doses tested. This silencing effect was confirmed by a marked reduction in serum ApoB protein content as well (Fig. 4c). To confirm these results in another mouse disease model, we evaluated Toc-HDO in the V30M Transthyretin (TTR) transgenic mouse, which is the model of familial amyloid polyneuropathy. The Toc-HDO targeting the transgene TTR mRNA was also more potent than the parent ASO on decreasing the expression of the mutant TTR (Fig. 4d).

Figure 4: Toc-HDO mediates potent gene silencing in a mouse disease model.
figure 4

(ac) Repeated injections of ASO or Toc-HDO to hypercholesterolaemic mice on a high-fat diet. qRT–PCR analyses of relative ApoB mRNA levels in liver (a), serum LDL cholesterol levels (b) (n=4, mean values±s.e.m., *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus PBS) and western blot of serum ApoB protein (c). (d) Dose-dependent reduction of gene silencing in V30M TTR transgenic mice with Toc-HDO targeting TTR (n=3, mean values±s.e.m., **P<0.01). Data are representative of at least three independent experiments each (a,b,d). P values were calculated from the Student’s two-tailed t-test (a,b) or the Jonckheere–Terpstra test (d).

Investigations of Toc-HDO in non-human primates

To extend these findings to non-human primates, cynomolgus monkeys were injected with saline, 2 mg kg−1, or 8 mg kg−1 ApoB mRNA targeting ASO or Toc-HDO. Consistent with observations in mice, the Toc-HDO complex was more effective at reducing serum LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol compared with saline or single ASO-injected monkeys (Fig. 5, upper panels). In contrast, there was no significant change in non-ApoB-containing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) level (Fig. 5, left below panel). We observed no treatment-related adverse effects on the clinical appearance or behaviour of monkeys treated with Toc-HDO compared with saline-treated controls. Biochemical analyses of serum showed that ALT level in 8 mg kg−1 Toc-HDO-injected monkeys was mildly and transiently increased (Supplementary Table 4).

Figure 5: Toc-HDO mediates potent gene silencing in non-human primates.
figure 5

Single injections of ASO or Toc-HDO to non-human primates. Serum LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels were shown as a ratio of pre-dose values (n=3, mean values±s.e.m., *P<0.05, **P<0.01.). Data are representative of two independent experiments each. P values were calculated from Tukey’s two-tailed test.

Biodistribution of Toc-HDO

We investigated the mechanism underlying the enhanced silencing ability of Toc-HDO. A relatively selective accumulation of fluorescence-labelled Toc-HDO in the liver was detected by histological analysis (Supplementary Fig. 5) and by quantification of the signal intensities (Fig. 6a). The absolute tissue concentration of the DNA strand in the liver of mice injected with 0.75 mg kg−1 Toc-HDO was 5.0 times that observed for ASO by quantitative real-time PCR assay (Fig. 6b) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Supplementary Fig. 6). Increased accumulation of Toc-HDO compared with the parent ASO was also confirmed by histological analysis with fluorescence-labelled Toc-HDO. The fluorescence signal in the cytosol of hepatocytes and non-parenchymal cells was more robust in Toc-HDO-injected mouse liver (Fig. 6c). Because the increase in the silencing effect of Toc-HDO relative to ASO (22.2-fold) at ED50 was more than the increase in oligonucleotide delivery to the liver (5.0-fold), we analysed the correlation between delivered oligonucleotide content and level of target mRNA in the liver of mice (Fig. 6d). The differences between the fitted curves showed that the silencing efficacy of Toc-HDO delivered to the liver (effective concentration; EC50, 6.4 pmol g−1) was 4.8 times higher than that of ASO (EC50, 30.9 pmol g−1), which could be a result of enhanced delivery to hepatocytes over non-parenchymal cells29, or of increased silencing effect of Toc-HDO after the uptake of hepatocytes.

Figure 6: Delivery mechanisms of Toc-HDO.
figure 6

(a) Concentration of DNA/LNA gapmer in each organ 6 h after injection of 0.75 mg kg−1 AlexaFlour 647-labelled ASO or Toc-HDO. The other organs including brain, heart, lung, spleen and muscle had no signal. (b) qRT–PCR analyses of oligonucleotide levels in liver 3 d after injection (n=3, mean values±s.e.m., **P<0.01). (c) Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of mouse livers at 6 h after injection of Cy3-labelled 0.75 mg kg−1 ASO or Toc-HDO. Red: Cy3-labelled DNA/LNA gapmer; green: AlexaFluor 488 Phalloidin; blue: Hoechst 33342; Bar, 20 μm. (d) Relationship between the concentration of DNA/LNA gapmer and ApoB mRNA levels in the liver. The regression equation between the concentration of DNA/LNA gapmer and ApoB mRNA levels in liver was y=−0.236ln(x)+1.31, R2=0.815 (ASO) and y=−0.151ln(x)+0.781, R2=0.923 (Toc-HDO). Data are representative of at least three independent experiments each (a,b,d). P values were calculated from Student’s two-tailed t-test (b).

Binding molecules of Toc-HDO in serum

We explored whether this hepatic tropism was related to interactions with a carrier molecule in serum. We investigated the carrier molecule of Toc-HDO to the liver using a mixture of Toc-HDO and collected mouse lipoprotein fractions from serum (ex vivo) and serum from Toc-HDO-injected mouse (in vivo). The results of fluorescence correlation spectroscopy indicated that the estimated size of the serum molecule that bound to Toc-HDO (both ex vivo and in vivo) was close to that of HDL, which is the major component of mouse serum lipoproteins. In contrast, the size of ASO was much smaller and was similar to that of albumin (Fig. 7a). Next, we examined the binding of Toc-HDO and lipid profiles using high-performance gel-shift assays. The endogenous HDL fraction was isolated by ultracentrifugation from the sera of wild-type mice, whereas the endogenous LDL fraction was collected from the sera of LDL receptor (LDLR)-deficient (Ldlr)−/− mice, because wild-type mice only had small amounts of LDL in their sera. The gel-shift assays demonstrated the binding of Toc-HDO to both separated LDL and HDL in a saturable manner (Fig. 7b). Furthermore, we found that injected Toc-HDO was present with some of the serum proteins and lipids including HDL, and there was no free Toc-HDO in mouse serum (Supplementary Fig. 7). We also investigated the binding of Toc-HDO to LDL and HDL fractions, which were collected by fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) from the fluorescent-labelled Toc-HDO-injected wild-type or Ldlr−/− mouse serum (Fig. 7c). Toc-HDO distributed both LDL and HDL fractions with predominance to the HDL fraction.

Figure 7: Incorporation of Toc-HDO into lipoproteins.
figure 7

(a) Diffusion time of Cy3-labelled oligonucleotides in HDL fraction of serum (ex vivo) or the serum extracted from mice 10 min after injection of 3 mg kg−1 Cy3-labelled ASO or Toc-HDO (in vivo) determined by fluorescence correlation spectroscopic analysis (n=10, mean values±s.e.m.). HDL or LDL fraction (control) was stained using Nile Red. (b) Gel-shift assay of Toc-HDO with extracted mouse HDL or LDL. (c) Oligonucleotide concentration of serum lipoprotein fractions 30 min after injection of 6 mg kg−1 AlexaFlour 647-labelled Toc-HDO (n=3, mean values±s.e.m.). ND, not detected. (d) qRT–PCR analyses of ApoB mRNA levels in liver 3 d after injection of 0.75 mg kg−1 Toc-HDO into wild-type or Ldlr−/− mice. Data are expressed as mean values±s.e.m. (n=3, **P<0.01). Data are representative of at least three independent experiments each (a,c,d). P values were calculated from Student’s two-tailed t-test (d).

To examine the uptake mechanism by hepatocytes, we injected Toc-HDO into Ldlr−/− mice. The suppression of target ApoB mRNA was decreased in Ldlr−/− mice compared with wild-type mice (Fig. 7d). This indicated that uptake of Toc-HDO by hepatocytes was mediated, at least in part, through LDLR. Together, these data show that conjugation with α-tocopherol results in the binding of Toc-HDO to serum lipoproteins and a more specific and efficient delivery to the liver along with physiological pathway of vitamin E30.

Processing mechanisms of Toc-HDO

Next, we investigated how the processing of Toc-HDO relates to the silencing mechanism. To analyse processing of the RNA strand, 13-mer DNA/31-mer cRNA with an 18-mer 2′-O-methyl RNA overhang on the 3′ end was used for the detection of cRNA in northern blot analysis (Fig. 8a). Northern blot analysis of liver from mice treated with Toc-HDO with 13-mer DNA/31-mer cRNA (similar potency as 13-mer DNA/13-mer cRNA, Supplementary Fig. 8) revealed that the full-length cRNA was almost non-detectable by 24 h after injection. The detected cRNA fragments indicated that the cRNA was cleaved by two different cleavage sites at 2/3/4 base pairs and 9/10 base pairs from the 5′ end of the unmodified RNA of the heteroduplex (Fig. 8a,b). This suggested that the cleaved cRNA fragments were too short to remain bound to the DNA strand, resulting in unwinding from the DNA strand. It should be noted that the major cleavage sites (2/3/4 base pairs from the 5′ end of unmodified RNA) are different from that reported for recombinant human RNase H1 (refs 31, 32, 33, 34). When all RNA of cRNA molecules were replaced by RNase-resistant 2′-O-methyl RNA (Fig. 8b), the in vivo silencing effect of Toc-HDO was markedly reduced (Fig. 8c), indicating that cleavage of the cRNA is important for efficient silencing with Toc-HDO.

Figure 8: Intracellular processing mechanisms of Toc-HDO.
figure 8

(a) Schematic illustration of the construction of 13-mer DNA/31-mer cRNA Toc-HDO. Arrows: presumed cleavage sites of the 31-mer cRNA. (b) Northern blot analysis of 31-mer cRNA sequences of Toc-HDO in livers from 6 mg kg−1 of Toc-HDO or RNase-resistant Toc-HDO (that is, Toc-HDO cRNA molecules in which all of the RNA was replaced by 2′-O-methyl RNA (2′-OMe cRNA))-injected mice. cRNA, Toc-HDO with unmodified cRNA; 2′-OMe, Toc-HDO with 2′-OMe cRNA. (c) qRT–PCR analyses of ApoB mRNA levels in liver injected with 0.75 mg kg−1 Toc-HDO, Toc-HDO with 2′-OMe cRNA or PBS alone. cRNA, Toc-HDO with unmodified cRNA; 2′-OMe, Toc-HDO with 2′-OMe cRNA (n=3, mean values±s.e.m., *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus PBS). Data are representative of at least three independent experiments each (c). P values were calculated from Student’s two-tailed t-test (c).

Discussion

ASO with the RNase H mechanism of action is typically composed of 13–25–nucleotide-long single-stranded DNA, whereas siRNA is composed of 21- to 30-nucleotide-long double-stranded RNA. Previous studies have shown that conjugation of fatty acids and cholesterol to siRNAs and micro-RNA targeting single-stranded ASOs enhances the half-life in circulation, cellular uptake and activity of the antisense agent25,35,36,37. To extend these studies, we tried to directly conjugate α-tocopherol to single-stranded ASO-targeting ApoB mRNA, but the silencing activity of the ASO was much reduced in mouse liver compared with the unconjugated ASO (Fig. 1d). This was likely a result of the conjugated α-tocopherol interfering with the access of the ASO to the target mRNA in the nucleus by tethering the ASO to lipid membranes or other molecules within cells27. Lipid-conjugated siRNA, which was designed with a cleavable linker or nucleotide to release the lipid from oligonucleotides in the cells, had more potency25,38,39. In our previously reported case, α-tocopherol conjugated to the 5′ terminus of the guide strand of 27/29-mer siRNA was processed by Dicer to generate 21/21-mer mature siRNA, resulting in a release of α-tocopherol moiety from the oligonucleotide in the cytoplasm25. Surprisingly, we found that the hybridizing α-tocopherol-conjugated cRNA to DNA/LNA gapmer markedly enhanced the activity of the parent ASO (Fig. 1b). We found that the cRNA was cleaved in the liver by specific nucleases (Fig. 8b). The major cleavage sites were different from that reported for recombinant human RNase H1 and may reflect cleavage by another endonuclease such as RNase T2-like RNase in lysosome40. Inhibition of the cleavage of the cRNA interfered with silencing ability (Fig. 8c), indicating that release of cRNA with conjugated lipid from oligonucleotide in the cells is a key processing step for the parent ASO activity41.

Recently, several approaches such as liposomes or LNPs have been reported to deliver siRNA8,42,43,44 and ASO45 to the liver, and they showed strong silencing effect of target gene in vivo. However, LNP-formulated siRNAs still have limitations in the clinic9. LNP-formulated siRNAs are more efficient at escaping endosomal compartments, but they are prone to immune activation9 and their immunogenicity and cytotoxicity has been reported46,47. LNPs are more complex to manufacture9 and the large particle size of LNPs (40–70 nm)8,44,47 restricts their biodistribution to tissues with open vasculatures including liver and tumour9. In comparison, the preparation of Toc-HDO is significantly less complex, and they were not found to be immunostimulatory in our evaluations (Table 1).

We previously conjugated α-tocopherol to siRNA (Toc-siRNA) targeting mouse ApoB mRNA and obtained increased delivery of siRNA in mouse liver25. Its ED50 was 2 mg kg−1, and the knockdown effect of the target gene returned to the baseline level 4 days after injection25. In contrast, the ED50 of Toc-HDO was 0.038 mg kg−1, and the reduction of ApoB mRNA in the liver and the decrease of serum LDL cholesterol lasted for >1 month. Although direct comparison of Toc-siRNA and Toc-HDO is difficult because of differences in the target sequence and chemistry of the oligonucleotides, Toc-HDOs are more efficient for in vivo applications than Toc-siRNAs.

In cynomolgus monkeys, larger amounts of Toc-HDO were found to be necessary to achieve a similar reduction of serum LDL cholesterol than in mice (Figs 2d and 5). In this study, we used the same sequence of the DNA strand of Toc-HDO-targeting mouse ApoB mRNA as reported previously23. The parent ASO binds cynomolgus monkey and mouse ApoB mRNA with 100% homology. In this previous study, 32 mg kg−1 of a single dose of this ASO was required to reduce serum LDL cholesterol level by 70% in monkeys, whereas the same ASO reduced non-HDL cholesterol by 70% in mice at a dose of 2.5 mg kg−1 (ref. 23). Broad experience with phosphorothioate gapmer ASO in pre-clinical animal models has shown that they generally exhibit lower potency in monkeys as compared with mice and humans. Yu et al.48 reported cross-species comparison of in vivo pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics relationships of Mipomersen, a phosphorothioate DNA/MOE gapmer ASO. The EC50 of this ASO in liver tissue was 101±32 μg g−1 in mice, 119±15 μg g−1 in transgenic mice containing the human APOB transgene and 81±122 μg g−1 in humans, whereas EC50 was 300±191 μg g−1 in cynomolgus monkeys48. These results suggested that ASOs are less active in monkeys as compared with mice and humans. The origins of these effects are not obvious but could be a result of differences in binding to individual plasma and cell surface proteins in different species resulting in differential intracellular trafficking of ASOs49,50.

Liver safety is an important concern for clinical applications of all antisense therapeutic modalities51. Sequence-dependent and hybridization-dependent off-target effects have been observed, especially with shorter ASOs. The microarray gene expression analysis showed several downregulated genes predicted to be because of off-target hybridization of HDO (Table 2). In addition, sequence-dependent and hybridization-independent immune-stimulatory adverse effects mediated by activation of toll-like innate receptors52,53 can also be a concern. Finally, a sequence- and hybridization-independent chemical property of nucleotide analogues and chemical modifications can cause liver dysfunction51,54,55,56,57. Although our data suggested that Toc-HDO did not have additional off-target genes relative to the parent ASO, and exhibited no immune-stimulatory adverse effects, there was a minor but significant liver dysfunction probably caused by LNA and/or α-tocopherol conjugation (Supplementary Table 2). However, as it is dose dependent, this chemical adverse effect was decreased compared with the parent ASO at the dose producing the same silencing effect (Table 1).

In summary, the Toc-HDO molecular technique can be applied to any ASOs previously reported, and it can improve the silencing effect of the ASOs by 20-fold when targeting the liver. This improved efficacy and no increase in adverse effects observed with Toc-HDO helps justify the use of the second strand despite the slightly enhanced complexity associated with clinical development. Furthermore, conjugation of another appropriate drug delivery molecule to HDO can extend this technology to target other organs or cells. Our ligand-conjugated DNA/RNA heteroduplex opens up a new horizon for human gene therapy as a novel class of oligonucleotide drugs.

Methods

Design and synthesis of Toc-HDO

A series of DNA/LNA, DNA/2′-MOE or DNA/cEt gapmer and cRNAs of different lengths (12- to 31-mers) were designed to target mouse ApoB mRNA (NM_009693), which was the same as human APOB mRNA (NM_000384)23, mouse organic anion transporter 3 (Oat3) mRNA (NM_031194) or mouse Srb1 mRNA (NM_016741)22.

A series of gapmers were synthesized by Gene Design (Osaka, Japan) and ISIS Pharmaceuticals (Carlsbad, CA). The sequences of the gapmer targeting ApoB mRNA were as follows: 12-mer gapmer, 5′-G*C*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*T*C-3′; 13-mer gapmer, 5′-G*C*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*T*C*A-3′; 14-mer gapmer, 5′-A*G*C*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*T*C*A-3′; and 16-mer gapmer, 5′-C*A*G*c*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*t*C*A*G-3′, where lowercase italic letters represent DNA, uppercase bold letters represent LNA (capital C denotes LNA methylcytosine) and asterisks represent phosphorothioate linkages. The sequence of another 14-mer gapmer targeting mouse ApoB mRNA58 was 5′-C*C*A*a*c*c*a*a*t*t*t*C*T*C-3′. The sequence of the non-ApoB-related 13-mer gapmer targeting mouse Oat3 mRNA was 5′-G*A*a*g*g*t*c*a*t*g*G*C*A-3′, and that of the 13-mer gapmer targeting the human TTR mRNA was 5′-C*G*t*a*g*t*t*g*t*a*A*T*C-3′.

The sequences of the gapmer targeting Srb1 mRNA were as follows: 13-mer gapmer with LNA, 5′-C*A*g*t*c*a*t*g*a*c*T*T*C-3′; 14-mer gapmer with cEt, 5′-T*C*a*g*t*c*a*t*g*a*c*t*T*C-3′; and 20-mer gapmer with 2′-MOE, 5′-G*C*T*T*C*a*g*t*c*a*t*g*a*c*t*T*C*C*T*T-3′, where asterisks represent phosphorothioate linkages, lowercase italic letters represent DNA and uppercase bold letters represent LNA (capital C denotes LNA methylcytosine) in the 13-mer gapmer, cEt in the 14-mer gapmer and 2′-MOE in the 20-mer gapmer.

The shuffle sequence of the 13-mer gapmer targeting ApoB mRNA is 5′-T*G*t*c*t*c*t*g*c*c*T*G*G-3′, and that of the 13-mer gapmer targeting Srb1 mRNA is 5′-A*C*c*g*a*t*a*c*t*g*C*T*T-3′.

A series of cRNAs were synthesized by Hokkaido System Science (Sapporo, Japan). The sequences of the cRNAs targeting ApoB mRNA are as follows: 12-mer cRNA, 5′-g*a*AUACCAAU*g*c-3′; 13-mer cRNA, 5′-u*g*a*AUACCAAU*g*c-3′; 13-mer 2′-OMe cRNA, 5′-u*g*a*auaccaau*g*c-3′; 14-mer cRNA, 5′-u*g*a*AUACCAAU*g*c*u-3′; 16-mer cRNA, 5′-c*u*g*AAUACCAAUG*c*u*g-3′; 31-mer cRNA, 5′-u*g*a*AUACCAAUgcuacgcauacgcacca*c*c*a-3′; and 31-mer 2′-OMe cRNA, 5′-u*g*a*auaccaaugcuacgcauacgcacca*c*c*a-3′, where uppercase letters represent RNA, lowercase letters represent 2′-O-methyl sugar modification and asterisks represent phosphorothioate linkages. The sequence of another 14-mer cRNA targeting mouse ApoB mRNA was 5′-g*a*g*AAAUUGGU*u*g*g-3′. The sequence of the 13-mer non-ApoB-related cRNA targeting mouse Oat3 mRNA is 5′-u*g*c*CAUGACCU*u*c-3′, and the sequence of the 13-mer cRNA complementary to the gapmer targeting the human TTR mRNA is 5′-c*c*a*GGCAGAGA*c*a-3′. The sequences of the cRNAs targeting Srb1 mRNA are as follows: 13-mer cRNA, 5′-g*a*a*GUCAUGAC*u*g-3′; 14-mer cRNA, 5′-g*a*AGUCAUGACU*g*a-3′; and 20-mer cRNA, 5′-a*a*g*g*a*AGUCAUGACU*g*a*a*g*c-3′. The shuffle sequence of the 13-mer cRNA targeting ApoB mRNA is 5′-g*a*u*UACAACUA*c*g-3′, and that of the 13-mer gapmer targeting Srb1 mRNA is 5′-a*a*g*CAGUAUCG*g*u-3′.

Cy3 or AlexaFluor 647 fluorophores were covalently bound to the 5′ ends of DNA/LNA gapmers, and α-tocopherol was covalently bound to the 5′ ends of DNA/LNA gapmers or cRNAs. For the generation of HDO, equimolar amounts of DNA and RNA strands were heated in PBS (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) at 95 °C for 5 min and slowly cooled to room temperature.

Mouse studies

Wild-type Crlj:CD1 (ICR) mice or C57BL/6 mice aged 4–5 weeks (Oriental Yeast, Tokyo, Japan), 5-week-old B6.129S7-Ldlr (tm1Her)/J (Ldlr−/−) mice (Jackson Laboratory, ME) and human mutant TTR transgenic mice (expressing the Val30Met TTR protein) were kept on a 12-h light/dark cycle in a pathogen-free animal facility with free access to food and water. ASO or Toc-HDO was administered to the mice by tail-vein injection on the basis of body weight. All oligonucleotides were formulated in PBS, which was also used as the control. The oligonucleotides were administered to mice by a single injection or repeated injections. Animal experiments were performed at the Tokyo Medical and Dental University, except for animal experiments with 2′-MOE and cEt gapmer, which were performed at ISIS Pharmaceuticals. All experiments were conducted with more than three mice, and these procedures were in accordance with the ethical and safety guidelines for animal experiments of Tokyo Medical and Dental University (#0140144A) and American Association for the Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care. The mouse model of hypercholesterolaemia was produced by feeding mice a high-fat synthetic diet (CE-2 plus 20% w/w beef tallow powder and 1.25% cholesterol, 10 kGy irradiation, CLEA Japan, Tokyo, Japan) from 3 weeks before injection. The 0.02–6 mg kg−1 oligonucleotides were administered to wild-type mice by a single injection. The 0.09 or 0.75 mg kg−1 oligonucleotides were administered to hypercholesterolaemia model mice, and the injections were repeated once a week for 4 weeks. For hypercholesterolaemia model mice, sera were collected 7 days (d) after the final injection for measurement of LDL cholesterol levels and western blot analysis. For postmortem analyses, mice were deeply anesthetized first with intraperitoneally administered 60 mg kg−1 pentobarbital, and then killed by transcardiac perfusion with PBS after confirming the absence of blink reflex.

Non-human primate studies

Cynomolgus monkeys were housed in individual cages at the Tsukuba Primate Medical Center, National Institute of Biomedical Innovation. The animals (three males per dose level) received 10-min intravenous infusion of either 2 or 8 mg kg−1 ASO, Toc-HDO or saline. Blood samples were collected for haematology and blood chemistry analyses from the femoral veins before the administration and at days 3, 7, 14 and 21 after administration. All experiments were conducted with more than three Cynomolgus monkeys, and these procedures were in accordance with the ethical and safety guidelines for animal experiments at the Tokyo Medical and Dental University (#0150097A).

Quantitative real-time PCR assay

Total RNA was extracted from mouse liver by using Isogen (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan). To detect mRNA, DNase-treated RNA (2 μg) was reverse transcribed with SuperScript III and Random Hexamers (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). To detect short oligonucleotides, including DNA/LNA gapmer, quantitative real-time (qRT)–PCR analysis was performed using the TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and a Light Cycler 480 Real-Time PCR Instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The primers and probes for DNA/LNA gapmers, mouse ApoB, Srb1, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh; NM_008084), transthyretin (Ttr; NM_013697), superoxide dismutase 1 (Sod1; NM_011434), sno-234 (Snord70; NR_028554) and human TTR (NM_000371) genes were designed by Applied Biosystems.

Western blot analysis

Mouse serum (4 μl) was diluted with 12 μl of PBS, and mouse liver (50 mg) was homogenated using 125 μl of homogenate buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.1% SDS, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.01% sodium deoxycholate and 1 × Complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics)). Samples (16 μl) were mixed with 4 μl of Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and then denatured at 95 °C for 2 min. Total proteins were separated by electrophoresis on a 5–20% gradient polyacrylamide gel (ATTO Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Blots were probed with goat primary antibodies against Apolipoprotein A-I (1:500, sc-23605, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and Apolipoprotein B (1:500, sc-11795, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or Scavenging receptor SRB1 (1:2,000, ab52629, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and β-actin (1:500, ab6276, Abcam), and then incubated with anti-goat secondary antibody (1:2,000, sc-2020, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:2,000, sc-2004, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:2,000, sc-2005, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase. Blots were visualized with SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and analysed by a ChemiDoc System (Bio-Rad).

Isolation of the lipoprotein fraction from serum

The lipoprotein fraction was prepared by ultracentrifugation according to the following method59. First, a half volume of a solution of density 1.182 g ml−1 was layered onto one volume of mouse serum and centrifuged for 3.6 h at 337,000g at 16 °C. The half volume of the upper solution was set aside for use in experiments as the LDL fraction. The one volume of the lower solution was mixed with a half volume of a solution of density 1.478 g ml−1 and centrifuged for 7.5 h at 266,000g at 16 °C. The half volume of the upper solution obtained after this second centrifugation contained HDL and was used in experiments as the HDL fraction.

Fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC)

Lipoprotein profiles of isolated mouse lipoprotein fraction were analysed by an online dual enzymatic method for simultaneous quantification by FPLC at Skylight Biotech (Akita, Japan)60. Mouse serum (10 μl) 30 min after injection of AlexaFluor 647-conjugated 6 mg kg Toc-HDO was diluted with saline up to a volume of 200 μl and loaded onto FPLC columns (TSKgel LipopropakXL, Tosoh Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan), followed by simultaneous and continuous detection of total cholesterol. The flow-through was subfractionated into 20 tubes for 60 s each, with 262.5 μl in each tube. Samples were taken from each subfraction: tubes 1 and 2 (over 75.0 nm) contained the chylomicron-sized fraction from serum; tubes 3–7 (64.0–31.3 nm) contained the very-LDL-sized fraction; tubes 8–13 (28.6–16.7 nm) contained the LDL-sized fraction; and tubes 14–20 (under 15.0 nm) contained the HDL-sized fraction. Each sample was used to measure the concentration of DNA/LNA gapmer as described below.

DNA/LNA gapmer concentration in serum or each organ

Mice were injected with AlexaFluor 647-conjugated ASO or Toc-HDO, and 6 h later various organs (brain, heart, lung, liver, kidney, spleen, intestine and muscle) and serum were harvested. The signal intensity of AlexaFluor 647 in the serum or homogenate of each organ was measured by i-control (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland), and then the concentration of DNA/LNA gapmer was calculated.

Gel-shift assay

For ex vivo samples, Toc-HDO (100 pmol) was added to 0–66 μl of mouse serum, 0–1.6 μl of HDL fraction from mouse serum or 0–12.8 μl of LDL fraction from Ldlr−/− mouse serum. For in vivo samples, serum was collected from mouse 5 min after injection of 0.75 mg kg−1 Toc-HDO. The samples were resolved by electrophoresis on a 15% polyacrylamide gel for 60 min at 100 V. The oligonucleotides were visualized under ultraviolet after staining the gel with ethidium bromide in Tris–borate–EDTA buffer.

Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy analysis

To elucidate the interacting carrier molecule in the serum, we first incubated Cy3-labelled ASO or Toc-HDO (100 pmol) for 20 min at 37 °C with mouse HDL fraction (99 μl) (‘ex vivo’ samples). Next, we intravenously injected 3 mg kg−1 Cy3-labelled ASO or Toc-HDO to the mouse, and corrected serum 10 min after injection (‘in vivo’ samples). The measurements were performed using the ConfoCor 3 module in combination with the LSM 510 (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Göttingen, Germany) equipped with the C-Apochromat × 40/1.2 W objective. A HeNe laser (543 nm) was used for Cy3-labelled ASO and Toc-HDO excitation in PBS or serum, and excitation of the Nile Red (Tokyo Chemical Industry, Tokyo, Japan)-labelled HDL or LDL fraction. Emission was filtered through a 560- to 615-nm band-pass filter. Samples were placed into an 8-well Lab-Tek chambered slide (Nalgene Nunc International, Rochester, NY), and diffusion time was measured at room temperature. Autocorrelation curves obtained from 10 measurements with a sampling time of 20 s were fitted with the ConfoCor 3 software package to determine the diffusion time of samples.

Northern blot analysis

Total RNA was extracted from mouse liver using Isogen II (Nippon Gene). Total RNA (30 μg) was separated by electrophoresis in an 18% polyacrylamide urea gel and transferred to a Hybond-N+ membrane (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). The blot was hybridized with a probe corresponding to the cRNA sequence, or with the mouse U6 micro-RNA sequence (internal control), which had been labelled with digoxigenin-ddUTP using a DIG Oligonucleotide 3′-End Labelling Kit, 2nd Generation (Roche Diagnostics). The sequence of the DNA probe for detecting cRNA was 5′-TGGTGCGTATGCGTAGCATTGGTATTCA-3′. The signals were visualized using the Gene Images CDP-star Detection Kit (Amersham Biosciences).

Isolation of cytosolic fraction from liver tissue

Subcellular fractionation of hepatocytes was conducted by centrifugation by the following method61. Liver samples (50 mg each) were homogenized in 1 ml of buffer containing 0.32 M sucrose, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 20 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) homogenization buffer (pH 7.2) and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, by 10 strokes of a tight-fitting glass homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged at 1,200g for 15 min, and the supernatant was used as the cytosolic fraction.

Melting temperature measurement

Ultraviolet melting experiments were performed using a Shimadzu UV-1650PC spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a melting temperature (Tm) analysis accessory. Equimolecular amounts of two single-stranded oligonucleotides were dissolved in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) containing 100 mM NaCl to give a final strand concentration of 4 μM. The oligonucleotides were annealed at 90 °C and slowly cooled to room temperature. The melting profile was recorded at 260 nm in the forward and reverse direction from 5 to 90 °C at a scan rate of 0.5 °C min−1.

Evaluation of adverse effects

A single dose, 0.75 or 6 mg kg−1 ASO or 0.04 or 0.75 mg kg−1 Toc-HDO, was injected into the tail veins of mice. Sera were collected 3 d after injection, and blood chemistry was assessed. For the repeated-dose study, 1 mg kg−1 ASO or Toc-HDO in PBS was injected into the tail vein of ICR mice for 4 consecutive days. Blood samples were collected 24 h after the final injection, haematology and blood chemistry were assessed and organs were collected for the pathological study described below.

Histopathological analyses

For pathological analyses, organs were postfixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) in PBS for 6 h, embedded in paraffin, cut into 4-μm-thick sections using a Leica CM 3050S cryostat (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (Muto Pure Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan). To analyse liver lipid accumulation, mice were injected with 0.75 mg kg−1 ASO or 0.04 mg kg−1 Toc-HDO and 7 d later the liver was removed and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 12 h and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. The liver samples were sectioned (10 μm) and stained with filtered Oil Red O (Muto Pure Chemicals) at 37 °C for 10 min. Nuclei were counterstained with Mayer haematoxylin solution for 10 min. The slides were analysed using an Olympus AX80 Automatic Research Photomicroscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

To analyse the biodistribution of Toc-HDO, 0.75 mg kg−1 Cy3-labelled ASO or Toc-HDO in PBS was injected into the mouse tail veins. Tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 12 h and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Tissue sections (10 μm) were prepared with a Leica CM3050 S cryostat (Leica Microsystems). The sections were stained with Hoechst 33342 (Sigma-Aldrich) to visualize nuclei and with 13 nmol l−1 AlexaFluor 488 phalloidin (Life Technologies) to visualize cell membrane, and then they were analysed using a LSM 510 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging).

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

ELISA-based detection of ASOs was performed by the following method62. Frozen liver tissues of Toc-HDO-treated mice were mechanically homogenized for 2 min at 30 oscillations s−1. Total protein concentrations of the resultant solutions were adjusted to 4 mg ml−1. To prepare six standard solutions for the calibration curve, we hybridized known concentrations of ASOs to cRNAs by denaturing them at 95 °C for 5 min and overnight annealing at 37 °C. Then, an oligonucleotide-untreated liver homogenate was added to serially diluted duplex-containing solutions to yield final concentrations of oligonucleotides ranging from 25.6 pM to 200 nM. These standard samples were incubated with a nuclease solution containing ribonuclease H (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan) and exonuclease T (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) at 25 °C for 3 h and heated at 70 °C for 40 min. Equal amounts of 23-mer biotinylated template DNA solution and each standard or sample solution were mixed and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h on Reacti-Bind NeutrAvidin-coated 96-well plates. The plates were then washed three times with washing buffer, the 9-mer probe DNA was added and the plates were incubated at 15 °C for 3 h. Subsequently, 200 μl of anti-digoxigenin-AP (1:2,000) was added, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. After washing, AttPhos Substrate (Promega, Fitchburg, WI) solution was added. After 15 min, the fluorescence intensity was determined using a SpectraMax M2e microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). The linear range of the ELISA system was 25.6 pM to 200 nM with R2>0.987.

The levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α in the blood samples were analysed using the Mouse IFN-γ ELISA Kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and Mouse TNF-α ELISA Kit (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturers’ protocol.

Microarray experiments

Mouse livers were harvested 3 d after injection of 6 mg kg−1 ASO or 0.75 mg kg−1 Toc-HDO. Total RNA was extracted from the livers using the mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturers’ protocol to separate procedures for large RNA isolation. Microarray analyses (50 ng of total RNA) were performed using SurePrint G3 Mouse GE 8 × 60 K (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA).

Statistical analysis

All data represent mean±s.e.m. Student’s two-tailed t-tests were used to determine the significance of differences between two groups in qRT–PCR assays and analyses of lipoprotein levels in serum. Tukey’s two-tailed tests were used to determine the significance of differences to multiple comparisons in qRT–PCR, haematology and blood chemistry analyses. The Jonckheere–Terpstra test was used to determine the significance of differences in dose-dependent reduction analyses of ApoB or TTR mRNA levels. Analysis of covariance was used to determine the significance of differences between fitted curves of concentration of DNA/LNA gapmer and liver ApoB mRNA levels in liver. The regression equation of the dose–response relationship was y=−0.528ln(x)+0.4083, R2=0.999 (ASO) and y=−0.293ln(x)−0.4588, R2=0.999 (Toc-HDO).

Additional information

Accession codes. All gene expression and DNA-sequencing data are deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus at the National Center for Biotechnology Information under the accession number GSE64625.

How to cite this article: Nishina, K. et al. DNA/RNA heteroduplex oligonucleotide for highly efficient gene silencing. Nat. Commun. 6:7969 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8969 (2015).

Accession codes

Accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. Kole, R., Krainer, A. R. & Altman, S. RNA therapeutics: beyond RNA interference and antisense oligonucleotides. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 11, 125–140 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang, K. Biotech comes to its 'antisenses' after hard-won drug approval. Nat. Med. 19, 252 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller, T. M. et al. An antisense oligonucleotide against SOD1 delivered intrathecally for patients with SOD1 familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a phase 1, randomised, first-in-man study. Lancet Neurol. 12, 435–442 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzgerald, K. et al. Effect of an RNA interference drug on the synthesis of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) and the concentration of serum LDL cholesterol in healthy volunteers: a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial. Lancet 383, 60–68 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coelho, T. et al. Safety and efficacy of RNAi therapy for transthyretin amyloidosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 819–829 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Crooke, S. T. & Geary, R. S. Clinical pharmacological properties of mipomersen (Kynamro), a second generation antisense inhibitor of apolipoprotein B. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 76, 269–276 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Geary, R. S., Baker, B. F. & Crooke, S. T. Clinical and preclinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mipomersen (kynamro(®)): a second-generation antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of apolipoprotein B. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 54, 133–146 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gilleron, J. et al. Image-based analysis of lipid nanoparticle-mediated siRNA delivery, intracellular trafficking and endosomal escape. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 638–646 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haussecker, D. Current issues of RNAi therapeutics delivery and development. J. Control. Release 195, 49–54 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yin, H. et al. Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 541–555 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nair, J. K. et al. Multivalent N-acetylgalactosamine-conjugated siRNA localizes in hepatocytes and elicits robust RNAi-mediated gene silencing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 16958–16961 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanasty, R., Dorkin, J. R., Vegas, A. & Anderson, D. Delivery materials for siRNA therapeutics. Nat. Mater. 12, 967–977 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ozcan, G., Ozpolat, B., Coleman, R. L., Sood, A. K. & Lopez-Berestein, G. Preclinical and clinical development of siRNA-based therapeutics. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev 87, 108–119 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bennett, C. F. & Swayze, E. E. RNA targeting therapeutics: molecular mechanisms of antisense oligonucleotides as a therapeutic platform. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 50, 259–293 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu, H. et al. Determination of the role of the human RNase H1 in the pharmacology of DNA-like antisense drugs. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 17181–17189 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Obika, S. et al. Synthesis of 2′-O,4′-C-methyleneuridine and -cytidine. Novel bicyclic nucleosides having a fixed C3, -endo sugar puckering. Tetrahedron Lett. 38, 8735–8738 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Obika, S. et al. Stability and structural features of the duplexes containing nucleoside analogues with a fixed N-type conformation, 2′-O,4′-C-methyleneribonucleosides. Tetrahedron Lett. 39, 5401–5404 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh, S. K., Koshkin, A. A., Wengel, J. & Nielsen, P. LNA (locked nucleic acids): synthesis and high-affinity nucleic acid recognition. Chem. Commun. 4, 455–456 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Freier, S. M. & Altmann, K. H. The ups and downs of nucleic acid duplex stability: structure-stability studies on chemically-modified DNA:RNA duplexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4429–4443 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Teplova, M. et al. Crystal structure and improved antisense properties of 2'-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-RNA. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 535–539 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Seth, P. P. et al. Synthesis and biophysical evaluation of 2′,4′-constrained 2′-methoxyethyl and 2′,4′-constrained 2′O-ethyl nucleic acid. J. Org. Chem. 75, 1569–1581 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Murray, S. et al. TricycloDNA-modified oligo-2'-deoxyribonucleotides reduce scavenger receptor B1 mRNA in hepatic and extra-hepatic tissues-a comparative study of oligonucleotide length, design and chemistry. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 6135–6143 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Straarup, E. M. et al. Short locked nucleic acid antisense oligonucleotides potently reduce apolipoprotein B mRNA and serum cholesterol in mice and non-human primates. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 7100–7111 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Juliano, R. L., Ming, X. & Nakagawa, O. Cellular uptake and intracellular trafficking of antisense and siRNA oligonucleotides. Bioconjug. Chem. 23, 147–157 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nishina, K. et al. Efficient in vivo delivery of siRNA to the liver by conjugation of α-tocopherol. Mol. Ther. 16, 734–740 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Uno, Y. et al. High-density lipoprotein facilitates in vivo delivery of α-tocopherol-conjugated short-interfering RNA to the brain. Hum. Gene Ther. 22, 711–719 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nishina, T. et al. Chimeric antisense oligonucleotide conjugated to α-tocopherol. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 4, e220 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Birmingham, A. et al. 3′ UTR seed matches, but not overall identity, are associated with RNAi off-targets. Nat. Methods 3, 199–204 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Prakash, T. P. et al. Targeted delivery of antisense oligonucleotides to hepatocytes using triantennary N-acetyl galactosamine improves potency 10-fold in mice. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 42, 8796–8807 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rigotti, A. Absorption, transport, and tissue delivery of vitamin E. Mol. Aspects Med. 5-6, 423–436 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nowotny, M. et al. Structure of human RNase H1 complexed with an RNA/DNA hybrid: insight into HIV reverse transcription. Mol. Cell 28, 264–276 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tadokoro, T., Chon, H., Koga, Y., Takano, K. & Kanaya, S. Identification of the gene encoding a type 1 RNase H with an N-terminal double-stranded RNA binding domain from a psychrotrophic bacterium. FEBS J. 274, 3715–3727 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lima, W. F. et al. Human RNase H1 discriminates between subtle variations in the structure of the heteroduplex substrate. Mol. Pharmacol. 71, 83–91 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Laxton, C. et al. Selection, optimization, and pharmacokinetic properties of a novel, potent antiviral locked nucleic acid-based antisense oligomer targeting hepatitis C virus internal ribosome entry site. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55, 3105–3114 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Soutschek, J. et al. Therapeutic silencing of an endogenous gene by systemic administration of modified siRNAs. Nature 432, 173–178 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wolfrum, C. et al. Mechanisms and optimization of in vivo delivery of lipophilic siRNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 1149–1157 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lorenz, C. et al. Steroid and lipid conjugates of siRNAs to enhance cellular uptake and gene silencing in liver cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14, 4975–4977 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen, Q. et al. Lipophilic siRNAs mediate efficient gene silencing in oligodendrocytes with direct CNS delivery. J. Control. Release 144, 227–232 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Patwa, A., Gissot, A., Bestel, I. & Barthélémy, P. Hybrid lipid oligonucleotide conjugates: synthesis, self-assemblies and biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 5844–5854 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Haud, N. et al. rnaset2 mutant zebrafish model familial cystic leukoencephalopathy and reveal a role for RNase T2 in degrading ribosomal RNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1099–1103 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Raouane, M., Desmaële, D., Urbinati, G., Massaad-Massade, L. & Couvreur, P. Lipid conjugated oligonucleotides: a useful strategy for delivery. Bioconjug. Chem. 23, 1091–1104 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Whitehead, K. A. et al. Degradable lipid nanoparticles with predictable in vivo siRNA delivery activity. Nat. Commun. 5, 4277 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Semple, S. C. et al. Rational design of cationic lipids for siRNA delivery. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 172–176 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Akinc, A. et al. Targeted delivery of RNAi therapeutics with endogenous and exogenous ligand-based mechanisms. Mol. Ther. 18, 1357–1364 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Prakash, T. P. et al. Lipid nanoparticles improve activity of single-stranded siRNA and gapmer antisense oligonucleotides in animals. ACS Chem. Biol. 8, 1402–1406 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yokota, T. et al. Efficient regulation of viral replication by siRNA in a non-human primate surrogate model for hepatitis C. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 361, 294–300 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kumar, V. et al. Shielding of lipid nanoparticles for siRNA delivery: Impact on physicochemical properties, cytokine induction, and efficacy. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 3, e210 (2014).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Yu, R. Z. et al. Cross-species comparison of in vivo PK/PD relationships for second-generation antisense oligonucleotides targeting apolipoprotein B-100. Biochem. Pharmacol. 77, 910–919 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Koller, E. et al. Mechanisms of single-stranded phosphorothioate modified antisense oligonucleotide accumulation in hepatocytes. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 4795–4807 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Stein, C. A. et al. Efficient gene silencing by delivery of locked nucleic acid antisense oligonucleotides, unassisted by transfection reagents. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e3 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Swayze, E. E. et al. Antisense oligonucleotides containing locked nucleic acid improve potency but cause significant hepatotoxicity in animals. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 687–700 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Senn, J. J., Burel, S. & Henry, S. P. Non-CpG-containing antisense 2'-methoxyethyl oligonucleotides activate a proinflammatory response independent of Toll-like receptor 9 or myeloid differentiation factor 88. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 314, 972–979 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Burel, S. A. et al. Unique O-methoxyethyl ribose-DNA chimeric oligonucleotide induces an atypical melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5-dependent induction of type I interferon response. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 342, 150–162 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Seth, P. P. et al. Structure activity relationships of α-L-LNA modified phosphorothioate gapmer antisense oligonucleotides in animals. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 1, e47 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Burel, S. A. et al. Preclinical evaluation of the toxicological effects of a novel constrained ethyl modified antisense compound targeting signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 in mice and cynomolgus monkeys. Nucleic Acids Ther. 23, 213–227 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Burdick, A. D. et al. Sequence motifs associated with hepatotoxicity of locked nucleic acid-modified antisense oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 4882–4891 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Kakiuchi-Kiyota, S. et al. Comparison of hepatic transcription profiles of locked ribonucleic acid antisense oligonucleotides: evidence of distinct pathways contributing to non-target mediated toxicity in mice. Toxicol. Sci. 138, 234–248 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Pederson, L., Hagedorn, P. H., Lindholm, M. W. & Lindow, M. A kinetic model explains why shorter and less affine enzyme-recruiting oligonucleotides can be more potent. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 3, e149 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kuwahara, H. et al. Efficient in vivo delivery of siRNA into brain capillary endothelial cells along with endogenous lipoprotein. Mol. Ther. 19, 2213–2221 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Usui, S., Hara, Y., Hosaki, S. & Okazaki, M. A new on-line dual enzymatic method for simultaneous quantification of cholesterol and triglycerides in lipoproteins by HPLC. J. Lipid Res. 43, 805–814 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Ishiguro, T. et al. The carboxy-terminal fragment of a1A calcium channel preferentially aggregates in the cytoplasm of human spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 Purkinje cells. Acta Neuropathol. 119, 447–464 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Yamamoto, T. et al. Cholesterol-lowering action of BNA-based antisense oligonucleotides targeting PCSK9 in atherogenic diet-induced hypercholesterolemic mice. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 1, e22 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Takayoshi Nishiya, Yusuke Yokouchi and Makoto Koizumi (Advanced Technology Research Laboratories, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd) for performing repeated injections study for adverse effects, and Mizuko Osaka (Department of Life Science and Medical Ethics, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University) for their technical support. This study was supported by grants from Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Japan (Molecular Technology).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.Nis, S.O. and T.Yo invented the concept of Toc-HDO. K.Nis, M.Y., C.F.B., K.K., H.M., S.O. and T.Yo designed the research. K.Nis, W.P., K.Y-T., Y.S., T.N., T.Ya., K.Nit., K.Y., H.K., H.Y., T.B., F.O., K.Miyat., P.P.S. and A.L. performed the experiments. K.N., W.P., T.Ya, K.Miyak, P.P.S., S.O. and T.Yo wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takanori Yokota.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

T.Yo is collaborating with Shionogi & Co., Ltd and NOF Corporation on the further development of HDO. P.P.S., A.L. and C.F.B. are employees of ISIS Pharmaceuticals. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-8 and Supplementary Tables 1-4 (PDF 1751 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nishina, K., Piao, W., Yoshida-Tanaka, K. et al. DNA/RNA heteroduplex oligonucleotide for highly efficient gene silencing. Nat Commun 6, 7969 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8969

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8969

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing