Wet-chemical synthesis and applications of non-layer structured two-dimensional nanomaterials


Non-layer structured nanomaterials with single- or few-layer thickness have two-dimensional sheet-like structures and possess intriguing properties. Recent years have seen major advances in development of a host of non-layer structured ultrathin two-dimensional nanomaterials such as noble metals, metal oxides and metal chalcogenides. The wet-chemical synthesis has emerged as the most promising route towards high-yield and mass production of such nanomaterials. These nanomaterials are now finding increasing applications in a wide range of areas including catalysis, energy production and storage, sensor and nanotherapy, to name but a few.


Since the exfoliation and identification of graphene in 2004 (ref. 1), layered ultrathin two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials have been the subject of intensive study over the last decade2,3,4,5. Ultrathin 2D nanomaterials are sheet-like structures with single- or few-layer thickness (typically less than 5 nm), but lateral size larger than 100 nm or even up to tens of micrometres. Till now, besides graphene1,2,6, a large number of graphene-like ultrathin 2D nanomaterials, such as transition metal dichalcogenides, layered metal oxides, transition metal carbides and layered-double hydroxides, have been prepared via various methods3,4,5,7,8,9,10,11,12. Owing to the ultrahigh specific surface area and strong quantum confinement of electrons in two dimensions, these ultrathin 2D nanomaterials display many unconventional physical, optical, chemical and electronic properties. They have also shown great potential in various applications such as electronic devices1,13,14,15, catalysis16,17,18, energy storage and conversion19,20, sensing21,22 and biomedicine23.

Layered compounds are those that possess strong lateral chemical bonding in planes but display weak van der Waals interaction between planes. One typical example is graphite that consists of weakly stacked graphene sheets forming three-dimensional (3D) bulk crystals. However, many other materials form atomic bonding in three dimensions (for example, metals), reflecting the non-layered nature of their bulk crystals. Inspired by the layered ultrathin 2D crystals, one can also anticipate that controlled synthesis of non-layer structured 2D materials may bring up some unique properties and advanced functions that cannot be achieved for their counterparts in other dimensionalities. A host of non-layer structured ultrathin 2D nanomaterials, such as noble metals (for example, Au, Pd and Rh), metal oxides (for example, TiO2, WO3, CeO2, In2O3, SnO2, Fe2O3 and so on) and metal chalcogenides (for example, PbS, CuS, CuSe, SnSe, ZnSe, ZnS, CdSe and so on), have been prepared over the last few years; almost all of these non-layer structured ultrathin 2D nanomaterials are synthesized using wet-chemical synthesis approaches. Expectedly, the synthesized 2D nanomaterials offer some unique advantages in comparison with their counterparts in other dimensionalities and hold great promises in a variety of applications, such as catalysis, supercapacitors, photodetectors and photothermal therapy. Although many reviews on ultrathin 2D nanomaterials are available in the literature2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,12, almost all of them focus on the layered 2D crystals. Therefore, a timely, comprehensive review on non-layer-structured 2D nanomaterials is of great importance for the future study.

In this review, we aim to give an overview on the recent progress of wet-chemical synthesis and applications of non-layer structured 2D nanomaterials such as metals, metal oxides and metal chalcogenides. We first introduce various types of wet-chemical synthesis strategies for preparation of non-layer structured 2D nanomaterials including 2D-templated synthesis, hydro/solvothermal synthesis, self-assembly of low-dimensional nanocrystals and soft colloidal templated synthesis. Then some promising applications, especially in catalysis, of the synthesized 2D nanomaterials are briefly described, with emphasis on those with excellent performance. Finally, a summary of current research status and progress, along with some personal perspectives on the challenges and future research directions in this promising area, are given.

Wet-chemical synthesis method and structure characterization

Till now, a variety of synthetic strategies, such as mechanical exfoliation1,24,25,26, liquid exfoliation5,27,28,29,30, ion-intercalation and exfoliation5,31,32,33,34,35, chemical vapour deposition (CVD)36,37,38,39,40 and wet-chemical synthesis41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48, have been developed for preparation of ultrathin 2D nanomaterials. The comparison of some typical methods for synthesis of ultrathin 2D nanomaterials is summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Comparison of the typical synthetic methods for 2D nanomaterials.

The mechanical exfoliation technique that was first used to produce graphene is the typical approach for producing single- or few-layer nanosheets from their corresponding layered bulk crystals1,24,25,26. The pristine 2D crystals (for example, graphene and MoS2) obtained by this approach often show high quality and large lateral size, which are ideal for investigation of their intrinsic properties and fabrication of electronic devices. However, the low throughput at the current form limits their practical applications. Consequently, as a promising alternative, liquid exfoliation by direct sonication of layered bulk crystals in solvents or surfactant/polymer solutions was developed to produce ultrathin 2D nanomaterials in high yield and large scale5,27,28,29,30. However, the yield of single-layer sheets produced by this method is low and it is hard to separate the single-layer sheets from the solution. Alternatively, the ion-intercalation and exfoliation method was developed towards the high-yield and large-scale production of single-layer nanosheets, such as graphene, MoS2, TiS2, TaS2, WS2, ZrS2, h-BN and so on5,31,32,33,34,35. However, the 2D nanosheets obtained by this method might possess many defects and relatively small lateral size, and this approach is also very sensitive to water and oxygen. It should be noted that all aforementioned exfoliation methods are only applicable to those materials whose bulk crystals are layered.

In addition to these exfoliation methods, CVD method is another appealing strategy for growth of high-quality single-crystalline 2D sheets on substrates with scalable size, controllable thickness and excellent electronic properties36,37,38,39,40. However, the CVD method suffers from the requirement of high temperature, high vacuum and specific substrates. Wet-chemical synthesis has been emerging as a very promising alternative towards the high-yield, low-cost and mass production of all types of ultrathin 2D nanosheets in the solution phase41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48. Particularly, almost all the non-layer structured ultrathin 2D nanomaterials, such as metals, metal chalcogenides and metal oxides, can be synthesized using wet-chemical synthesis methods because of their non-layered nature.

Meanwhile, along with the development of nanotechnology, some useful and powerful techniques have been identified or developed for characterization of these non-layer structured 2D nanomaterials. For example, the commonly used techniques for characterization of traditional nanomaterials, such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, atomic force microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, have been used to characterize the size, thickness, crystallinities, exposed crystal facets, compositions and structures of these ultrathin 2D nanomaterials. The X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy is another powerful technique to study the local atomic geometry and chemical state of atoms of one specific element in the ultrathin 2D materials, allowing for understanding the defects, vacancies and doping effects12. In this section, we focus on several main wet-chemical synthesis methods including 2D-templated synthesis, hydro/solvothermal synthesis, self-assembly of low-dimensional nanocrystals and soft colloidal templated synthesis. We give examples of synthesis of non-layer-structured 2D nanomaterials along with their characterization by various techniques. The summary of the dimension, synthesis methods and used characterization techniques of these non-layer-structured 2D nanomaterials are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 List of non-layer structured 2D nanomaterials.

2D-templated synthesis

Templated synthesis methods have been widely used for growth of anisotropic nanocrystals (for example, nanowires)49,50, in which the crystal growth can be confined in specific dimension. Non-layer structured 2D nanomaterials can be synthesized using prepared 2D nanomaterials as templates51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58. As a typical example, our group prepared Au square nanosheets (AuSSs) with thickness of 2.4 nm (16 Au atomic layers) and size of 200–500 nm by reducing HAuCl4 with 1-amino-9-octadecene on graphene oxide template (Fig. 1a)51. As can be seen, this AuSS crystal owns unique hexagonal-close packed (hcp) phase rather than the common face-centred cubic (fcc) phase. This is the first time that the pure hcp Au nanostructure, which can be stable under ambient conditions, has been synthesized. Furthermore, thick Au sheets can be obtained via a secondary growth by using this hcp AuSS as the seed and a phase transformation from hcp to fcc was observed during the secondary growth process52. The centre of resultant thick Au sheets has an alternating hcp/fcc structural domain, while the edge site is defect-free fcc structure. Significantly, our group has also demonstrated recently that the further coating of Ag thin layer on the hcp AuSSs could induce the phase transformation to obtain (100)f-oriented fcc Au@Ag core–shell square sheets or (110)h/(101)f-oriented hcp/fcc Au@Ag square sheets53. Similarly, the further growth of Pt or Pd thin layer on AuSSs also could induce the phase transformation from the hcp to fcc structures to form core–shell Au@Pt or Au@Pd nanoplates54. However, unlike the coating of Ag, the coating of Pt or Pd on hcp AuSSs mainly leads to the formation of fcc Au@Pt or Au@Pd rhombic nanoplates with (101)f orientation, although a little amount of fcc (100)f-oriented Au@Pt and Au@Pd square nanoplates can also be observed. It is believed that the large lattice mismatch between Pt or Pd and Au compared with Ag is responsible for the formation of unprecedented (101)f-oriented core–shell nanoplates. More interestingly, the complete phase transformation of AuSSs from hcp to fcc structures was realized via the simple ligand exchange under ambient conditions at room temperature53. By simply replacing the oleylamine capped on AuSSs with thiol molecules, the hcp AuSSs can be transformed into (100)f-oriented fcc AuSSs (ref. 53). Interestingly, Wei and coworkers55 recently developed a CuO nanoplate-templated method to synthesize freestanding half-unit-cell α-Fe2O3 nanosheets. The layered iron hydroxide nanosheets were first prepared on the CuO template surface. Then the CuO template was slowly etched away to get the freestanding iron hydroxide nanosheets. Finally, an annealing treatment was carried out to transform the iron hydroxide sheets into freestanding α-Fe2O3 nanosheets with size of up to 1 μm and thickness of 0.55–0.59 nm (Fig. 1b,c).

Figure 1: 2D nanosheets synthesized using the 2D-templated synthesis method.

(a) TEM images of hcp AuSSs. Inset: crystallographic models for a typical AuSS with its basal plane along the [110]h zone axis, showing ABAB stacking along the [001]h direction. Adapted from ref. 51 (b) TEM image of α-Fe2O3 nanosheets. Inset: HRTEM image and Tyndall effect of α-Fe2O3 nanosheets. Adapted, with permission, from ref. 55 (copyright 2014 American Chemical Society). (c) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of α-Fe2O3 nanosheets. Adapted, with permission, from ref. 55. (Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society). (d) SEM and (e) TEM images of CuInS2 nanosheets. Reproduced, with permission, from ref. 56 (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Inc). (f) TEM and (g) SEM images of CuSe and Cu2−xSe nanosheets, respectively. Reproduced, with permission, from ref. 57 (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Inc).

The used templates (for example, graphene oxide and CuO) in the aforementioned examples are inert during the synthesis process. Recently, our group reported the use of semiconductor nanosheets (for example, CuSe and CuS) as reactive templates to prepare novel 2D nanostructures56,57. For example, by using the synthesized CuS nanosheet with thickness of 4.8 nm as the reactive template, a series of copper-based ternary and quaternary chalcogenide nanosheets including CuInS2, CuInxGa1−xS2 and Cu2ZnSnS4 were successfully prepared via the cation exchange process (Fig. 1d,e)56. The shape and size of nanosheets did not undergo significant changes during the transformation process. All the resultant ternary and quaternary semiconductor nanosheets have uniform size, shape and thickness. In addition, our group also demonstrated that semiconductor nanosheets (for example, Cu2−xSe and Cu1.97S) with different crystal phases can be synthesized via phase transformation by using as-prepared nanosheets (for example, CuSe and CuS) as templates57. Briefly, the synthesized hexagonal-phased CuSe nanosheets were transformed into cubic-phased Cu2−xSe nanosheets by simply heating treatment in presence of CuI cations. Both the CuSe and Cu2−xSe nanosheets have similar morphologies with size up to micrometre and thickness of 5 nm (Fig. 1f,g). Notably, a similar transformation from the ultrathin hexagonal-phased CuS nanosheets to cubic-phased Cu1.97S nanosheets can also be realized by using this method. In addition, Li and co-workers demonstrated the synthesis of NiO nanosheets with size of up to micrometre and thickness of <2 nm from layered α-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets through a simple annealing treatment58.

Hydro/solvothermal synthesis

Hydro/solvothermal synthesis is another typical method that has been widely used for synthesis of non-layer structured 2D nanomaterials59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67. As a typical example, Li and co-workers demonstrated the synthesis of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP)-supported single-layer rhodium (Rh) nanosheets with edge length of 500–600 nm and thickness of 0.4 nm via a facile solvothermal route (Fig. 2a–c)59. This is the first time for synthesis of single-layer atomic metal nanostructures in the liquid phase. In addition, Dou and co-workers developed a generalized solvothermal method for the synthesis of a series of metal oxide nanosheets, including TiO2, ZnO, Co3O4, WO3, Fe3O4 and MnO2 (Fig. 2d–f)60. The size of the TiO2 nanosheets is 200 nm, while the sizes of ZnO, Co3O4 and WO3 are up to 1–10 μm. Similarly, the thickness of these metal oxide nanosheets varied between 1.6 and 5.2 nm, corresponding to 2–7 stacking layers of the monolayer.

Figure 2: 2D nanosheets synthesized using the hydro/solvothermal synthesis method.

(a,b) TEM image of the PVP-capped Rh nanosheets, and (c) AFM image of a bare Rh nanosheet. Adapted from ref. 59. (d) SEM images of 2D nanosheets of TiO2, ZnO (e) and Co3O4 (f; scale bars, 200 nm). Adapted from ref. 60. (g) TEM image of ZnSe single layers (scale bar, 500 nm). Inset: the enlarged TEM image (scale bar, 100 nm) and Tyndall effect of ZnSe single layers. Adapted from ref. 61. (h) AFM image ZnSe single layers (scale bar, 500 nm). Adapted from ref. 61. (i) AFM image of ultrathin surface-pitted CeO2 sheets (scale bars, 100 nm). Adapted from ref. 62.

In addition, Xie and co-workers used hydro/solvothermal method to synthesize several kinds of non-layer structured 2D nanosheets including ZnSe, ZnS, CeO2, In2O3, SnO2, Co9Se8 and Co9S8-oleylamine hybrid61,62,63,64,65,66. For instance, to synthesize ZnSe and ZnS nanosheets, the lamellar organic–inorganic intermediates, for example, (Zn2Se2)(n-propylamine) and (Zn2S2)(n-propylamine), were first synthesized using a solvothermal method61. Then the hybrid intermediates were exfoliated by sonication to get freestanding ultrathin ZnSe and ZnS nanosheets, respectively. The resultant ZnSe nanosheets possess a lateral size of 500 nm and thickness of 0.9 nm (Fig. 2g,h). Similarly, Zhang and co-workers reported the preparation of CdS nanosheets with size of 300–800 nm and thickness of 4 nm via a similar strategy by using the diethylenetriamine (DETA) as the surfactant67. Moreover, Xie and co-workers reported that atomically thin CeO2 sheets with surface-confined pits could be prepared by a hydrothermal method combined with the subsequent thermal annealing treatment62. Briefly, CeCO3OH sheets were first synthesized from cerium chloride using sodium oleate as the surfactant via a hydrothermal method. Then the intermediate sheets were transformed into ultrathin CeO2 sheets with surface-confined pits having a thickness of 0.6 nm via a thermal annealing treatment (Fig. 2i). Besides, ultrathin In2O3 porous sheets with rich oxygen vacancies were also successfully synthesized via a similar hydrothermal method with subsequent thermal annealing process63.

Self-assembly of low-dimensional nanocrystals

Self-assembly of low-dimensional nanocrystals (for example, nanoparticles (NPs) and nanowires) is also a promising alterative way to prepare ultrathin 2D nanomaterials68,69,70,71,72,73. Generally, the fusion of low-dimensional nanocrystals occurs during the assembly process to form 2D nanomaterials. As a typical example, Weller and co-workers used a typical self-assembly strategy, that is, 2D-oriented attachment, to prepare ultrathin PbS nanosheets with size of 0.8–2 μm and thickness of 2.2 nm from tiny PbS NPs (ref. 68). The ordered and densely packed ligand layers of oleic acid on {100} surface of PbS NPs can drive the 2D-oriented attachment of PbS NPs to form large sheets. The chlorine-containing solvents in the initial nucleation and growth process of nanocrystals are also essential in the orientated attachment process. The 2D-oriented attachment is an entropy-driven crystal growth and reconstruction process, which minimizes high-surface-energy facets and interfaces between NPs, leading to the coalescence of NPs to form a large crystal. The formation mechanism was further confirmed by Wang and co-workers using the in situ small and wide-angle synchrotron X-ray scattering on the same spot of sample under pressure coupled with transmission electron microscopy69. Recently, single-crystalline WO3 nanosheets with thickness of 4–5 nm and lateral size up to micrometre have also been constructed via 2D-oriented attachment of tiny WO3 nanocrystals with size of 4–5 nm (ref. 70). As an alternative, Lu and co-workers demonstrated the self-assembly of Au nanoclusters into ultrathin nanosheets with single-cluster thickness71. The as-prepared Au15 clusters in a mixed solvent of dibenzyl ether and liquid paraffin were simply annealed at 140 °C to evaporate solvents to form assembled Au sheets at the interface. The assembled Au sheet with width of 300 nm and length of 200–1,000 nm is consistent of Au clusters rather than a single-crystal structure.

In addition to NPs, the assembly of nanowires into ultrathin 2D nanosheets has been also achieved recently72,73. For example, Yao and co-workers reported the synthesis of Eu2O3 nanosheets from the assembly of Eu2O3 nanowires with diameter of 1.5 nm (ref. 72). The Eu2O3 nanowire bundles in 1,5-pentanediol were transferred into water solution and soaked for different time. Then they were assembled in sheet-like porous structures after 3–5 min soaking, and further transformed to rectangle nanosheets when the soaking time increased to 1 h. The thickness of resultant sheets is 3.8 nm. The lateral size of Eu2O3 sheets can be tuned from several hundreds of nanometres to 10 μm by simply controlling the soaking time of nanowires. With similar strategy, Acharya et al.73 demonstrated the assembly of ultrathin PbS nanowires into 2D nanosheets with regular rectangular shape of 200–250 in width, 3–20 μm in length and 1.8 nm in thickness. The as-prepared PbS nanowires with diameter of 1.8 nm were assembled and fused together to form sheet structure via a collective coalescence approach at the air–water interface.

Soft colloidal templated synthesis and other methods

Generally, soft colloidal templated synthesis represents a type of oil phase-based methods74,75, in which the long-chain oleyl amine and/or oleic acid surfactants are used as the soft colloidal templates for directing the crystal growth. Recently, the soft colloidal templated synthesis has been employed for preparation of ultrathin 2D nanocrystals, especially for semiconductors76,77. In 2009, Hyeon and co-workers used this method to synthesize wurtzite ultrathin CdSe nanosheets76. It is supposed that intermediate lamellar complexes composed of 2D arrays of CdCl2 and alkyl amine or/and oleic acid were first obtained, in which the alkyl amine or/and oleic acid served as the soft colloidal template. Then the intermediate lamellar complex further reacted with the Se source to form stacked CdSe nanosheets. It was found that well-separated ultrathin CdSe nanosheets can be obtained by using the mixture of alkyl amine and oleic acid as the soft template in contrast to the use of single long-chain surfactant (for example, alkyl amine or oleic acid). The resultant single-layer CdSe sheets possess length of 200–300 nm, width of 100 nm and thickness of 1.4 nm. Recently, our group reported the generalized synthesis of ultrathin metal sulphide nanocrystals by using the soft colloidal templated strategy77. Ultrathin CuS nanosheets with thickness of 3.2 nm (two unit cells) were prepared in gram amount (Fig. 3a–c). The resultant CuS nanosheets have regular hexagonal shape with lateral size up to 453 nm (Fig. 3a,b).

Figure 3: 2D nanosheets synthesized using soft colloidal templated synthesis and other methods.

(a) SEM image of ultrathin CuS nanosheets. Inset: photograph of the colloid solution of CuS nanosheets. Adapted from ref. 77. TEM images of ultrathin CuS nanosheets with (b) lying flat and (c) standing on the TEM grids. Inset in b: scheme of an ultrathin CuS nanosheet. Adapted from ref. 77. (d) TEM and (e) AFM images of SnSe nanosheets. Adapted, with permission, from ref. 78 (Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society). (f) TEM image of Pd nanosheets. Adapted from ref. 81.

Some other wet-chemical methods have also been developed for synthesis of ultrathin 2D nanostructures, which cannot be categorized into the aforementioned methods78,79,80,81. As a typical example, Wang and co-workers presented a one-pot synthetic method for synthesis of single-layer SnSe nanosheets in oil phase78. The 1,10-phenanthroline was used as the morphology control agent, which played a crucial role in controlling the morphology of SnSe nanocrystals. The obtained SnSe nanosheets have lateral size of 300 and thickness of 1.0 nm (Fig. 3d,e). As another example, Yan and co-workers synthesized several ultrathin rare-earth oxide nanosheets in the oil phase in presence of ionic liquid salts79. Two types of Gd2O3 nanosheets with widths of 100 and 200 nm and thicknesses of 0.35 and 0.65 nm, respectively, were synthesized. Besides, this general method can also be extended to prepared Ho2O3 and Y2O3 nanosheets with thicknesses less than 1 nm. Very recently, Xie and co-workers demonstrated that the synthesis of single-layer β-Co(OH)2 nanosheets can be achieved by a simple and green approach under ambient atmospheric conditions using cobalt chloride and aminoethanol as precursors80. As an interesting example, Zheng and co-workers reported a CO-confined growth method to synthesize freestanding ultrathin hexagonal Pd nanosheets with thickness less than 10 atomic layers (1.8 nm) and controllable edge length from 20 to 160 nm (Fig. 3f)81. The use of CO as the capping agent is essential for the growth of Pd nanocrystals, which were confined in 2D because of its strong adsorption on the basal (111) planes of Pd nanosheets.

Applications of the non-layer structured 2D nanomaterials

Owing to their large lateral size and ultrathin thickness, 2D nanomaterials possess ultrahigh specific surface area82, and thus are ideal candidates for surface-active applications. For instance, ultrathin 2D nanomaterials have been proved to be fascinating platforms for engineering high-efficient catalysts for various kinds of catalytic applications83,84. It was found that some of the synthesized ultrathin 2D nanosheets have excellent activities in a number of catalytic processes. In addition, the ultrahigh surface area of 2D nanomaterials also makes them very promising electrode materials for supercapacitors and photodetectors. In this section, we will discuss the synthesized ultrathin 2D nanomaterials for various applications including catalysis, supercapacitors, photodetectors and photothermal therapy, with emphasis on those materials with excellent performance. The summary of the non-layer structured 2D nanomaterials for different applications is made in Table 2.

Organic catalytic reactions

Li and co-workers demonstrated that the single-layer Rh nanosheets could be a high-efficient catalyst for catalytic hydrogenation and hydroformylation reactions (Fig. 4a,b)59. Hydrogenation of phenol and hydroformylation of 1-octene were used as probe reactions to investigate the catalytic properties of PVP-capped Rh nanosheets. The PVP-capped Rh sheets gave >99.9% conversion within 4 h at near room temperature (30 °C) under low H2 pressure for hydrogenation of phenol. The catalytic activity of conversion at 1 h is seven and four times higher than those of PVP-capped Rh NPs and commercial Rh/C, respectively. In the hydroformylation of 1-octene, the PVP-capped Rh nanosheets also exhibited both superior catalytic activity and selectivity towards the target product (aldehyde) under mild reaction conditions. The excellent catalytic properties make the ultrathin Rh nanosheets a promising catalyst for catalytic organic reactions. It is well known that the surface atom ratio is a key factor in catalysis. Owing to its single-layer feature, the ratio of the surface Rh atom in Rh nanosheets is 100%. As a result, the largely enhanced catalytic activity could be ascribed to the full exposure of Rh atoms in the Rh nanosheets.

Figure 4: Catalytic activities of Rh and CeO2 nanosheets.

(a) Hydrogenation of phenol and (b) hydroformylation of 1-octene. Adapted from ref. 59. (c) The reaction temperature-dependent catalytic activities of CeO2-based catalysts for CO oxidation (experimental error: ±3%), and (d) the corresponding Arrhenius plot for the three CeO2-based samples (experimental error: ±3%). Adapted from ref. 62.

Electrocatalytic oxidation of formic acid

It was found that the Pd nanosheets could be highly efficient in electrocatalysis for oxidation of formic acid81. Owing to its high specific surface area, the measured electrochemically active surface area of Pd nanosheets with edge length of 41 nm was calculated to be as high as 67 m2g−1, which is slightly lower than the theoretically calculated maximum surface area (100 m2g−1). The experimental results indicated that the Pd nanosheets have excellent electrocatalytic activity for the oxidation of formic acid. The current density of Pd nanosheets for formic acid oxidation was measured to be 1,380 mA mg−1 at 0.14 V, which is much higher (2.5 times) than that of the commercial palladium black catalyst.

Photocatalytic water splitting

The ultrathin ZnSe nanosheet has been identified to be a promising catalyst for photoelectronchemical (PEC) solar water splitting61. By simply spin-coating ZnSe single layers, few atom-thick ZnSe sheets and bulk ZnSe on a polyethylene terephthalate substrate, flexible and transparent photoelectrodes were fabricated for water photocatalysis. All ZnSe-based photoelectrodes gave a very low current density (<5 μA cm−2) under the scan from −0.4 to 0.8 V in dark. Note that the single-layer ZnSe sheet-based photoelectrode showed photocurrent density of 2.14 mA cm−2 at 0.72 V under the irradiation of 300 W Xe lamp, which is higher than that of all other ZnSe-based photoelectrodes, and roughly 195 times higher than that of the bulk counterpart. Moreover, the ZnSe sheets also exhibited strong intensity and frequency-dependent photocurrent density. Compared with the ZnSe quantum dots with average size of 3–4 nm, the single-layer ZnSe nanosheets also showed much higher photocurrent density at 0.72 V, further confirming its strikingly efficient PEC water splitting. Similarly, it was found that the ultrathin porous In2O3 nanosheets with rich oxygen vacancy also presented superior performance compared with ultrathin porous In2O3 sheets with poor oxygen vacancy and bulk In2O3 when they were used as photoelectrodes in visible light PEC cells63.

Recently, Zhang and co-workers demonstrated that the ultrathin CdS nanosheets could be used as an efficient photocatalyst for hydrogen generation67. For comparison, the photocatalytic activities of some other CdS-based samples including CdS-DETA hybrid nanosheets, CdS nanosheet-based aggregates and CdS NPs were also studied. The average hydrogen production rate of CdS nanosheets reached 41.1 mmol h−1g−1, which is strikingly higher than that of the CdS-DETA hybrid nanosheets (7.5 mmol h−1g−1), CdS nanosheet-based aggregates (6.7 mmol h−1g−1), and CdS NPs (negligible). The apparent quantum efficiency of ultrathin CdS nanosheets was determined to be 1.38% at 420 nm. It was found that loading of small amount of PbS NPs (1 wt%) on CdS nanosheets can further significantly enhance the quantum efficiency to as high as 9.62%. Note that no obvious decrease in the H2 production rate was observed even after 12-h H2 evolution, indicating the good stability of catalyst.

Catalytic CO oxidation

Xie and co-workers reported that the ultrathin CeO2 nanosheets with 20% surface pits could be used as a high-efficiency catalyst for CO oxidation62. The pit-confined CeO2 nanosheets presented 50% conversion of CO to CO2 at 131 °C, which is much lower than that of the intact CeO2 sheets (248 °C) and bulk counterpart (345 °C; Fig. 4c). At 131 °C, the conversion ratio of intact CeO2 sheets and bulk crystals is only 3.2 and 0.89%, respectively. The temperature for these CeO2 nanosheets with surface pits used to completely convert CO to CO2 in the CO oxidation is 200 °C, which is also lower than those for CeO2 nanosheets (325 °C) and bulk materials (425 °C; Fig. 4c). It is worth pointing out that the catalytic property of these ultrathin pit-confined CeO2 nanosheets is the best so far among all reported CeO2-based catalysts for CO oxidation. In addition to the conversion temperature, the apparent activation energy of catalyst is another important parameter used for evaluation of CO oxidation. Significantly, the apparent activation energy of CeO2 nanosheets with numerous surface pits is 61.7 kJ mol−1, while that for CeO2 nanosheets and bulk counterpart is 89.1 and 122.9 kJ mol−1, respectively (Fig. 4d). The structural analysis of CeO2 nanosheets with surface pits revealed that the Ce sites have average coordination number of 4.6, indicating the unsaturated coordination nature of Ce at pit sites. The superior catalytic performance of the CeO2 nanosheets with numerous surface pits is attributed to the unsaturated-coordinated pit-surrounding Ce sites. According to the theoretical calculation, the four-coordinated and five-coordinated Ce sites are the more active sites for CO catalytic oxidation. In this case, The CeO2 sheets with these sites possess strikingly lower apparent activation energy in comparison with the other two CeO2 samples, resulting in the much lower conversion temperature for CO oxidation.

In addition, the same group demonstrated that the ultrathin SnO2 nanosheets with thickness of 0.6 nm also present excellent performance for the CO catalytic oxidation64. The ignition temperature used for single-layer SnO2 nanosheets with conversion ratio of 10% for CO oxidation is 124 °C, while for other counterparts it is much higher, that is, 203 °C for 1.9-nm-thick SnO2 nanosheets, 270 °C for SnO2 NPs and 360 °C for bulk SnO2. More importantly, the conversion temperature of 0.6-nm-thick SnO2 nanosheets is 165 °C, which is much lower than that of the 1.9-nm-thick SnO2 sheets (330 °C), SnO2 NPs (390 °C) and bulk SnO2 (475 °C). Similarly, the apparent activation energy of these samples also gives the similar tendency. The outstanding performance of 0.6-nm-thick SnO2 nanosheets could be ascribed to the extremely high specific surface area. Both the Sn and O atoms at surface sites have unsaturated coordination numbers that are favourable for CO catalytic oxidation, which is further confirmed by the density functional theory (DFT) calculations64.

Catalytic conversion of CO2 to CH4

The conversion of CO2 to CH4 fuel is of great importance to address both of the global warming and the energy-shortage problems85. As a typical example, Zou and co-workers presented that the ultrathin WO3 nanosheet could be a good photocatalyst for the reduction of CO2 to CH4 with H2O (ref. 70). It was found that CO2 and H2O can react with the photogenerated electrons and holes in the WO3 nanosheets under visible light irradiation to produce CH4 and O2 in comparison with the neglectable efficiency of the commercial WO3 powder. It is suggested that the enhanced performance for photocatalytic reduction of CO2 with H2O to hydrocarbon fuels is attributed to the size-quantization effect-induced change of WO3 band gap in this ultrathin 2D nanostructure. In addition, the ultrathin thickness of WO3 sheets is also beneficial for the fast charge mobility from the catalyst surface of the reactive agents (for example, CO2 and H2O) during the photoreduction process.


Supercapacitor has been recognized as one of the most promising energy-storage devices because of its high power density, fast charging time and long lifetime86. It is expected that some ultrathin 2D nanosheets, especially metal hydroxides or oxides, with ultrahigh specific surface area could be attractive electrodes for high-performance supercapacitors87. As a typical example, Xie and co-workers reported the fabrication of all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitor with ultrahigh energy density based on the single-layer β-Co(OH)2 nanosheet (Fig. 5)80. The single-layer β-Co(OH)2 electrode gave a higher specific capacitance (2,028 Fg−1), as compared with the 7-nm-thick β-Co(OH)2 nanosheet (998 Fg−1) and bulk β-Co(OH)2 electrodes (525 Fg−1). The high specific capacitance of single-layer β-Co(OH)2 nanosheets could be attributed to its ultrahigh specific surface area that enables it with all hydrogen atom-exposed surface. Moreover, the single-layer β-Co(OH)2 nanosheet was used as the cathode to fabricate all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitor device, in which the N-doped graphene was the anode. The fabricated cell exhibited specific capacitance of 241.9, 236.3, 231.8, 225.7 and 219.6 Fg−1 at the current density of 1, 2, 5, 10 and 20 Ag−1 (Fig. 5b), respectively. Importantly, its specific energy density decreased from 108.9 to 98.9 Wh kg−1, while the power density increased from 0.9 to 17.98 kW kg−1 as the current density increased from 1 to 20 Ag−1 (Fig. 5c). Even after 10,000 cycles, its capacitance still remained 93.2% at the scan rate of 20 mV s−1 (Fig. 5d), indicating its good cycling stability. Recently, Li and co-workers demonstrated that the ultrathin NiO nanosheets have good performance in supercapacitors58. It delivered high specific capacitance of 2,236 Fg−1 at 0.5 Ag−1. Even at higher current density, the specific capacitance is still maintained, that is, 1,392 Fg−1 at 12 Ag−1, and 1,576 Fg−1 at 4 Ag−1 with 99.1% retention after 2,000 cycles, suggesting good rate capability and excellent cycling stability. Although the NiO nanosheets present good performance in supercapacitor, its performance is not as good as the layered α-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets58.

Figure 5: Performance of the β-Co(OH)2 nanosheet-based supercapacitor.

(a) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves at various scan rates and (b) galvanostatic charge–discharge curves at different current densities (inset) and the corresponding calculated specific capacitances of the single-layer β-Co(OH)2 nanosheet-based all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitor. (c) Comparison of the electrochemical performance with previously reported asymmetric supercapacitors. (d) Cycling performance of the fabricated single-layer β-Co(OH)2 nanosheet-based all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitor measured at a scan rate of 20 mV s−1. Inset: the corresponding CV curves. Reproduced, with permission, from ref. 80 (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Inc).


It was reported that the prepared PbS nanosheets can be readily integrated in a photodetector device without further treatment68. The PbS sheet-based device exhibited low conductance in dark without substantial hysteresis (Fig. 6a). The conductance increased by more than two orders of magnitude under illumination of 532-nm laser at intensity of 2.0 mW cm−2 (Fig. 6a). A responsivity value of 0.472 AW−1 at 0.1 V was achieved. Recently, Dou and co-workers demonstrated that ultrathin 2D metal oxide nanosheets can be used as the active layers to integrate into transparent and flexible ultraviolet photodetectors (Fig. 6b–d)60. First of all, the single-layer CVD-grown graphene was transferred on a flexible polyethylene terephthalate substrate as the back electrode. Then, the suspension of ultrathin 2D metal oxide nanosheets in ethanol was spin-coated on the graphene electrode to form transparent and flexible photoelectrode (Fig. 6b). The deposited 2D metal oxide nanosheet layer has thickness of 50 nm. The photocurrent responses of the ultraviolet photodetectors were tested under 325-nm ultraviolet light (67 mW cm−2) or an alternating ON and OFF ultraviolet source with interval of 10 s. The photocurrent density of the ultrathin 2D metal oxide nanosheet-based photodetectors could reach the order of mA cm−2. The WO3 photodetector showed a typical p-type Schottky barrier contact, while the others exhibited obvious ohmic behaviours with perfect linear current–voltage (I–V) responses under the ultraviolet irradiation (Fig. 6c,d). Note that all the ultrathin metal oxide nanosheet-based devices showed much enhanced photocurrent under the ultraviolet irradiation, indicating that TiO2, ZnO and Co3O4 2D ultrathin nanosheets are promising candidates for fabrication of high-performance and low-cost photodetectors. More importantly, all the devices presented high stability and reproducibility towards the time response. Even after tens of ON/OFF switching cycles, no obvious degradation was detected, proving the excellent stability of the fabricated devices.

Figure 6: Performance of 2D nanosheet-based photodetectors.

(a) Current–voltage curves of PbS sheets in dark (red) and under illumination (blue) with a green laser. Inset: current–voltage curves on the logarithmic scale. From ref. 68. Reprinted from permission from AAAS. (b) Photograph of the flexibility demonstration of the fabricated electrode. Inset: SEM cross-section image of a typical photoelectrode. (c) I–V characteristics of photodetectors based on 2D nanosheets of TiO2, ZnO, Co3O4 and WO3, respectively. Inset: I–V characteristic of the dark photocurrent of 2D ZnO nanosheet photoanode. (d) The photoresponse behaviour of photodetectors under illumination with 325-nm ultraviolet light (67 mW cm−2) with ON/OFF interval of 10 s and bias of 0.5 V. Adapted from ref. 60.

Photothermal therapy

Photothermal therapy is to use the laser irradiation-generated heat to induce hyperthermia within tumour tissues, thus causing the denaturation of proteins, the disruption of cell membrane and subsequent killing of cancer cells88. For example, Zheng and co-workers demonstrated that the Pd nanosheet could be a promising photothermal agent for photothermal therapy for cancer81. The Pd nanosheets with controllable edge length exhibited the tunable and strong SPR absorption (826–1,068 nm) and high stability on the near-infrared (NIR) irradiation, and those with edge size of 41 nm presented the extinction coefficient of as high as 4.1 × 109M−1cm−1 at 1,045 nm. The temperature of 1 ml aqueous solution containing 27-p.p.m. Pd nanosheets could rise from 28.0 to 48.7 °C after 10-min irradiation by a NIR laser (808 nm, 1 W cm−2). The significant in vitro photothermal cell-killing effect has been achieved by using the Pd nanosheet as the photothermal agent on irradiation of 808 nm laser. More importantly, the Pd nanosheet also exhibited enhanced photothermal stability in comparison with Ag and Au nanostructures with the NIR photothermal effect81.

Future prospects

This review summarizes the recent progress on the wet-chemical preparation and applications of non-layer structured ultrathin 2D nanomaterials. A number of effective wet-chemical methods have so far been developed to prepare non-layer structured 2D nanomaterials (for example, metals, metal oxides and metal chalcogenides) in high yield, large scale and low cost. Excellent performances of these synthesized ultrathin 2D nanosheets for some important applications, especially in catalysis (for example, catalytic organic reactions and CO oxidation), have been demonstrated. From the point of view of the synthesis method, the 2D-templated synthesis method has been proved to be one of the most promising strategies. For example, by using layered or easily prepared 2D nanomaterials as templates, novel non-layer-structured 2D nanomaterials could be prepared through the proper chemical transformation methods such as cation exchange and oxidation. In such processes, the 2D morphology originated from the templating materials could be remained after the chemical transformation. In addition, the hydro/solvothermal synthesis is another appealing approach to synthesize non-layer-structured 2D nanomaterials, in which the experimental parameters, such as the concentration of precursors, solvent, reaction temperature and surfactants, are important factors. Therefore, systematic studies need to be conducted to optimize the experimental conditions to achieve the synthesis of new non-layer structured 2D nanostructures.

Currently, most reported wet-chemical methods are only applicable to synthesize specific materials with uncontrollable size, thickness and crystal phase. Despite that some pioneer work has been conducted, challenges still remain in this field. First, it is difficult to synthesize single-layer nanosheets for most non-layer structured materials by wet-chemical methods. Second, the lateral sizes of most non-layer structured 2D nanomaterials synthesized using wet-chemical methods are less than 1 μm, which is relatively small compared with the nanosheets prepared by exfoliation methods or CVD growth. Last, surfactants are always required during the synthesis process, which are undesirable for some further applications, especially for catalysis and electronic devices. Therefore, it is critical and urgent to find a general and effective way for controlled synthesis of ultrathin non-layer structured 2D nanomaterials. Meanwhile, the mechanisms underlying the crystal growth of ultrathin 2D nanomaterials remain unclear. Therefore, finding simple and efficient techniques for exploration of the mechanism behind these crystal growth processes is also a pressing topic. In addition, most researchers are focusing on producing ultrathin 2D nanomaterials and then demonstrating proof-of-concept applications. Little attention has been paid on the rational design of a material with desired lateral size, thickness, defect, crystal phase and structure. It is well known that the aforementioned structural parameters have significant effect on the performance of a material for specific application. Meanwhile, the favourable structural parameters vary for different applications. Therefore, one of the most challenging fact lies in how we can realize desired performance towards specific application via the rational design of an ultrathin 2D nanostructure with favourable size, thickness, surface state and defect at a highly controllable level.

It is noteworthy that the wet-chemical synthesis of non-layer-structured ultrathin 2D nanomaterials is still in its infant stage. On one hand, there are still a lot of materials whose ultrathin nanosheets have not been synthesized. For example, it is well known that Pt is one of the most robust catalysts for some electrocatalytic reactions (for example, hydrogen evolution and oxygen reduction reaction)89,90. It is anticipated that ultrathin Pt nanosheets, which have not been synthesized yet, could exhibit excellent catalytic activities for these electrocatalytic processes. Bearing this in mind, one of the future directions is to develop efficient methods for preparation of novel ultrathin 2D nanosheets in single component or multicomponents (for example, alloy), which could possess promising properties and advanced functions. On the other hand, previous studies have demonstrated that the incorporation of other nanomaterials, such as noble metals, metal oxides, semiconductors and polymers, with ultrathin 2D nanosheets (for example, graphene and transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets) to construct advanced functional composites is a very promising way to further optimize their properties and achieve their superior performances for a wide range of applications91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100. Inspiringly, another promising future direction in this field is the construction of functional hybrid nanomaterials on the basis of these synthesized non-layer structured ultrathin 2D nanosheets to achieve desired performance for numerous applications.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Tan, C. and Zhang, H. Wet-chemical synthesis and applications of non-layer structured two-dimensional nanomaterials. Nat. Commun. 6:7873 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8873 (2015).


  1. 1

    Novoselov, K. S. et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666–669 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Geim, A. K. & Novoselov, K. S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 6, 183–191 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Chhowalla, M. et al. The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Nat. Chem. 5, 263–275 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Xu, M. S., Liang, T., Shi, M. M. & Chen, H. Z. Graphene-like two-dimensional materials. Chem. Rev. 113, 3766–3798 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Nicolosi, V., Chhowalla, M., Kanatzidis, M. G., Strano, M. S. & Coleman, J. N. Liquid exfoliation of layered materials. Science 340, 1226419 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Allen, M. J., Tung, V. C. & Kaner, R. B. Honeycomb carbon: a review of graphene. Chem. Rev. 110, 132–145 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Wang, Q. H., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Kis, A., Coleman, J. N. & Strano, M. S. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotech. 11, 699–712 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Huang, X., Zeng, Z. Y. & Zhang, H. Metal dichalcogenide nanosheets: preparation, properties and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 1934–1946 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Sun, Y. F., Gao, S. & Xie, Y. Atomically-thick two-dimensional crystals: electronic structure regulation and energy device construction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 530–546 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Naguib, M. et al. Two-dimensional transition metal carbides. ACS Nano 6, 1322–1331 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Zhang, X. D. et al. Recent advances in free-standing two-dimensional crystals with atomic thickness: design, assembly and transfer strategies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 8187–8199 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Sun, Y. F. et al. Ultrathin two-dimensional inorganic materials: new opportunities for solid state nanochemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 3–12 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Radisavljevic, B., Radenovic, A., Brivio, J., Giacometti1, V. & Kis, A. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotech. 6, 147–150 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Yin, Z. Y. et al. Single-layer MoS2 phototransistors. ACS Nano 6, 74–80 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Liang, L. et al. Vacancy associates-rich ultrathin nanosheets for high performance and flexible nonvolatile memory device. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 3102–3108 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Song, F. & Hu, X. L. Exfoliation of layered double hydroxides for enhanced oxygen evolution catalysis. Nat. Commun. 5, 4477 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Voiry, D. et al. Enhanced catalytic activity in strained chemically exfoliated WS2 nanosheets for hydrogen evolution. Nat. Mater. 12, 850–855 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Yang, S. B. et al. Exfoliated graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets as efficient catalysts for hydrogen evolution under visible light. Adv. Mater. 25, 2452–2456 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Du, G. D. et al. Superior stability and high capacity of restacked molybdenum disulfide as anode material for lithium ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 46, 1106–1108 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Tsai, M. L. et al. Monolayer MoS2 heterojunction solar cells. ACS Nano 8, 8317–8322 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Zhu, C. F. et al. Single-layer MoS2-based nanoprobes for homogeneous detection of biomolecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 5998–6001 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Perkins, F. K. et al. Chemical vapor sensing with monolayer MoS2 . Nano Lett. 13, 668–673 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Cheng, L. et al. PEGylated WS2 nanosheets as a multifunctional theranostic agent for in vivo dual-modal CT/photoacoustic imaging guided photothermal therapy. Adv. Mater. 26, 1886–1893 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Novoselov, K. S. et al. Two-dimensional atomic crystals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10451–10453 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Li, H., Wu, J., Yin, Z. Y. & Zhang, H. Preparation and applications of mechanically exfoliated single- and multi-layer MoS2 and WSe2 nanosheets. Acc Chem. Res. 47, 1067–1075 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Li, H. et al. Mechanical exfoliation and characterization of single- and few-layer nanosheets of WSe2, TaS2, and TaSe2 . Small 9, 1974–1981 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Hernandez, Y. et al. High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. Nat. Nanotech. 3, 563–568 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Coleman, J. N. et al. Two-dimensional nanosheets produced by liquid exfoliation of layered materials. Science 331, 568 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Wang, H. et al. Half-metallicity in single-layered manganese dioxide nanosheets by defect engineering. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 1195–1199 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Zhi, C. Y., Bando, Y., Tang, C. C., Kuwahara, H. & Golberg, D. Large-scale fabrication of boron nitride nanosheets and their utilization in polymeric composites with improved thermal and mechanical properties. Adv. Mater. 21, 2889 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Dines, M. B. Lithium intercalation via n-butyllithium of the layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Mater. Res. Bull. 10, 287–291 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Joensen, P., Frindt, R. F. & Morrison, S. R. Single-layer MoS2 . Mater. Res. Bull. 21, 457–461 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Zeng, Z. Y. et al. Single-layer semiconducting nanosheets: high-yield preparation and device fabrication. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 11093–11097 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Zeng, Z. Y. et al. An effective method for the fabrication of few-layer-thick inorganic nanosheets. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 9052–9056 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Zhang, J. et al. High yield exfoliation of two-dimensional chalcogenides using sodium naphthalenide. Nat. Commun. 5, 2995 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Li, X. S. et al. Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science 324, 1312–1314 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Lee, Y. H. et al. Synthesis of large-area MoS2 atomic layers with chemical vapor deposition. Adv. Mater. 24, 2320–2325 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Ji, Q. Q., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y. F. & Liu, Z. F. Chemical vapour deposition of group-VIB metal dichalcogenide monolayers: engineered substrates from amorphous to single crystalline. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2587–2602 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Song, L. et al. Large scale growth and characterization of atomic hexagonal boron nitride layers. Nano Lett. 10, 3209–3215 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Shi, Y. M., Li, H. N. & Li, L.-J. Recent advances in controlled synthesis of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides via vapour deposition techniques. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2744–2756 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Yoo, D., Kim, M., Jeong, S., Han, J. & Cheon, J. Chemical synthetic strategy for single-layer transition-metal chalcogenides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 14670–14673 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Mahler, B., Hoepfner, V., Liao, K. & Ozin, G. A. Colloidal synthesis of 1T-WS2 and 2H-WS2 nanosheets: applications for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 14121–14127 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Xie, J. F. et al. Controllable disorder engineering in oxygen-incorporated MoS2 ultrathin nanosheets for efficient hydrogen evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 17881–17888 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Son, J. S. et al. Colloidal synthesis of ultrathin two-dimensional semiconductor nanocrystals. Adv. Mater. 23, 3214–3219 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Bi, W. T. et al. CuInSe2 ultrathin nanoplatelets: novel self-sacrificial template-directed synthesis and application for flexible photodetectors. Chem. Commun. 48, 9162–9164 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Vaughn, D. D. II, In, S.-I. & Schaak, R. E. A precursor-limited nanoparticle coalescence pathway for tuning the thickness of laterally-uniform colloidal nanosheets: the case of SnSe. ACS Nano 5, 8852–8860 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Yin, A. X. et al. Ru nanocrystals with shape-dependent surface-enhanced Raman spectra and catalytic properties: controlled synthesis and DFT calculations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 20479–20489 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Saleem, F. et al. Ultrathin Pt–Cu nanosheets and nanocones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 18304–18307 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Fullam, S., Cottell, D., Rensmo, H. & Fitzmaurice, D. Carbon nanotube templated self-assembly and thermal processing of gold nanowires. Adv. Mater. 12, 1430–1432 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Cao, G. Z. & Liu, D. W. Template-based synthesis of nanorod, nanowire, and nanotube arrays. Adv. Colloid. Interface 136, 45–64 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Huang, X. et al. Synthesis of hexagonal close-packed gold nanostructures. Nat. Commun. 2, 292 (2011)This paper presents the first achievement on the synthesis of pure ultrathin hexagonal close-packed gold squire sheets that are stable at ambient conditions by the wet-chemical synthesis method .

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Huang, X. et al. Synthesis of gold square-like plates from ultrathin gold square sheets: the evolution of structure phase and shape. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 12245–12248 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Fan, Z. X. et al. Surface modification-induced phase transformation of hexagonal close-packed gold square sheets. Nat. Commun. 6, 6571 (2015)This paper gives the first example on the surface modification such as ligand exchange and metal coating induced phase transformation from the hexagonal close-packed phase to face-centered cubic phase at room temperature and ambient conditions .

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Fan, Z. X. et al. Synthesis of ultrathin fcc Au@Pt and Au@Pd core-shell nanoplates from hcp Au square sheets. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 127, 5764–5768 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Cheng, W. R. et al. Half-unit-cell α-Fe2O3 semiconductor nanosheets with intrinsic and robust ferromagnetism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 10393–10398 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Wu, X. J. et al. Copper-based ternary and quaternary semiconductor nanoplates: templated synthesis, characterization, and photoelectrochemical properties. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 8929–8933 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Wu, X. J. et al. Two-dimensional CuSe nanosheets with microscale lateral size: synthesis and template-assisted phase transformation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 5083–5087 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Zhu, Y. Q. et al. Ultrathin nickel hydroxide and oxide nanosheets: synthesis, characterizations and excellent supercapacitor performances. Sci. Rep. 4, 5787 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Duan, H. H. et al. Ultrathin rhodium nanosheets. Nat. Commun. 5, 3093 (2014)This paper reports the first example on synthesis of single-layer rhodium nanosheets by a solvothermal method with excellent catalytic activities for catalytic organic reactions .

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60

    Sun, Z. Q. et al. Generalized self-assembly of scalable two-dimensional transition metal oxide nanosheets. Nat. Commun. 5, 3813 (2014)This paper presents a general route for the synthesis of a series of non-layer structured metal oxide nanosheets including TiO 2 , ZnO, Co 3 O 4 , WO 3 , Fe 3 O 4 and MnO 2 in solution phase .

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61

    Sun, Y. F. et al. Fabrication of flexible and freestanding zinc chalcogenide single layers. Nat. Commun. 3, 1057 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62

    Sun, Y. F. et al. Pits confined in ultrathin cerium(IV) oxide for studying catalytic centers in carbon monoxide oxidation. Nat. Commun. 4, 2899 (2013)This paper reports the synthesis of pits confined in ultrathin cerium(IV) oxide nanosheets as highly efficient catalysts for oxidation of carbon monoxide .

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63

    Lei, F. C. et al. Oxygen vacancies confined in ultrathin indium oxide porous sheets for promoted visible-light water splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 6826–6829 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64

    Sun, Y. F. et al. Atomically thin tin dioxide sheets for efficient catalytic oxidation of carbon monoxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 10569–10572 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65

    Zhang, X. D. et al. Half-metallic ferromagnetism in synthetic Co9Se8 nanosheets with atomic thickness. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 11908–11911 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66

    Zhang, X. D. et al. In-plane coassembly route to atomically thick inorganic-organic hybrid nanosheets. ACS Nano 7, 1682–1688 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67

    Xu, Y., Zhao, W. W., Xu, R., Shi, Y. M. & Zhang, B. Synthesis of ultrathin CdS nanosheets as efficient visible-light-driven water splitting photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. Chem. Commun. 49, 9803–9805 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68

    Schliehe, C. et al. Ultrathin PbS sheets by two-dimensional oriented attachment. Science 329, 550 (2010)This paper first reports the synthesis of non-layer structured ultrathin PbS nanosheets by two-dimensional oriented attachment from PbS tiny nanoparticles .

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69

    Wang, Z. W. et al. Deviatoric stress driven formation of large single-crystal PbS nanosheet from nanoparticles and in situ monitoring of oriented attachment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 14484–14487 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70

    Chen, X. Y. et al. Ultrathin, single-crystal WO3 nanosheets by two-dimensional oriented attachment toward enhanced photocatalystic reduction of CO2 into hydrocarbon fuels under visible light. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4, 3372–3377 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71

    Wu, Z. N. et al. Self-assembly of Au15 into single-cluster-thick sheets at the interface of two miscible high-boiling solvents. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 9952–9955 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72

    Zhong, Y. T., Yang, Y. J., Ma, Y. & Yao, J. N. Controlled synthesis of ultrathin lamellar Eu2O3 nanocrystals: self-assembly of 1D nanowires to 2D nanosheets. Chem. Commun. 49, 10355–10357 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73

    Acharya, S. et al. A bottom-up approach toward fabrication of ultrathin PbS sheets. Nano Lett. 13, 409–415 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74

    Ithurria, S. et al. Colloidal nanoplatelets with two-dimensional electronic structure. Nat. Mater. 10, 936–941 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75

    Ithurria, S. & Dubertret, B. Quasi 2D colloidal CdSe platelets with thicknesses controlled at the atomic level. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 16504–16505 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76

    Son, J. S. et al. Large-scale soft colloidal template synthesis of 1.4 nm thick CdSe nanosheets. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 686–6864 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77

    Du, Y. P. et al. A general method for the large-scale synthesis of uniform ultrathin metal sulphide nanocrystals. Nat. Commun. 3, 1177 (2012)This paper reports the first synthesis of ultrathin hexagonal CuS nanosheets with uniform size and thickess by the soft colloidal templated synthesis method .

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78

    Li, L. et al. Single-layer single-crystalline SnSe nanosheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 1213–1216 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79

    Zhang, Q. & Yan, B. Salt-effect-based synthesis and anomalous magnetic properties of rare-earth oxide nanosheets with sub-1 nm thickness. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 5150–5154 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80

    Gao, S. et al. Ultrahigh energy density realized by a single-layer β-Co(OH)2 all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 12789–12793 (2014)This paper reports the fabrication of high-performance all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitor devices based on single-layer β -Co(OH) 2 nanosheets .

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81

    Huang, X. Q. et al. Freestanding palladium nanosheets with plasmonic and catalytic properties. Nat. Nanotech. 6, 28–32 (2011)This paper reports a CO-confined growth method for synthesis of freestanding ultrathin hexagonal palladium nanosheets with a thickness less than 10 atomic layers and a controllable edge length from 20 to 160 nm .

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82

    Stoller, M. D., Park, S., Zhu, Y., An, J. & Ruoff, R. S. Graphene-based ultracapacitors. Nano Lett. 8, 3498–3502 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83

    Morales-Guio, C. G., Stern, L.-A. & Hu, X. L. Nanostructured hydrotreating catalysts for electrochemical hydrogen evolution. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 6555–6569 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84

    Sun, Y. F., Gao, S., Lei, F. C. & Xie, Y. Atomically-thin two-dimensional sheets for understanding active sites in catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 623–636 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85

    Roy, S. C., Varghese, O. K., Paulose, M. & Grimes, C. A. Toward solar fuels: photocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to hydrocarbons. ACS Nano 4, 1259–1278 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86

    Simon, P. & Gogotsi, Y. Materials for electrochemical capacitors. Nat. Mater. 7, 845–854 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87

    Wang, Q. & O’Hare, D. Recent advances in the synthesis and application of layered double hydroxide (LDH) nanosheets. Chem. Rev. 112, 4124–4155 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88

    Lal, S., Clare, S. E. & Halas, N. J. Nanoshell-enabled photothermal cancer therapy: impending clinical impact. Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 1842–1851 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89

    Chen, A. C. & Holt-Hindle, P. Platinum-based nanostructured materials: synthesis, properties, and applications. Chem. Rev. 110, 3767–3804 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. 90

    Peng, Z. M. & Yang, H. Designer platinum nanoparticles: control of shape, composition in alloy, nanostructure and electrocatalytic property. Nano Today 4, 143–164 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. 91

    Stankovich, S. et al. Graphene-based composite materials. Nat. Mater. 442, 282–286 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. 92

    Huang, X., Qi, X. Y., Boey, F. & Zhang, H. Graphene-based composites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 666–686 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93

    Tan, C. L. & Zhang, H. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheet-based composites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2713–2731 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. 94

    Huang, X. et al. Solution-phase epitaxial growth of noble metal nanostructures on dispersible single-layer molybdenum disulfide nanosheets. Nat. Commun. 4, 1444 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95

    Kuilla, T. et al. Recent advances in graphene based polymer composites. Prog. Polym. Sci. 35, 1350–1375 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. 96

    Huang, X., Tan, C. L., Yin, Z. Y. & Zhang, H. 25th Anniversary Article: hybrid nanostructures based on two-dimensional nanomaterials. Adv. Mater. 26, 2185–2204 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. 97

    Li, Y. G. et al. Advanced zinc-air batteries based on high-performance hybrid electrocatalysts. Nat. Commun. 4, 1805 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98

    Liang, Y. Y. et al. Co3O4 nanocrystals on graphene as a synergistic catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Nat. Mater. 10, 780–786 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. 99

    Yang, J. et al. Two-dimensional hybrid nanosheets of tungsten disulfide and reduced graphene oxide as catalysts for enhanced hydrogen evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 13751–13754 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. 100

    Tan, C. L. et al. Self-assembled chiral nanofibers from ultrathin low-dimensional nanomaterials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 1565–1571 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by MOE under AcRF Tier 2 (ARC 26/13, No. MOE2013-T2-1-034), AcRF Tier 1 (RGT18/13 and RG5/13), NTU under Start-Up Grant (M4081296.070.500000) and iFood Research Grant (M4081458.070.5000000), Singapore Millennium Foundation, and National Research Foundation in Singapore. This Research is also conducted by NTU-HUJ-BGU Nanomaterials for Energy and Water Management Programme under the Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) that is supported by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hua Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, C., Zhang, H. Wet-chemical synthesis and applications of non-layer structured two-dimensional nanomaterials. Nat Commun 6, 7873 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8873

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing