Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Noncontact friction via capillary shear interaction at nanoscale


Friction in an ambient condition involves highly nonlinear interactions of capillary force, induced by the capillary-condensed water nanobridges between contact or noncontact asperities of two sliding surfaces. Since the real contact area of sliding solids is much smaller than the apparent contact area, the nanobridges formed on the distant asperities can contribute significantly to the overall friction. Therefore, it is essential to understand how the water nanobridges mediate the ‘noncontact’ friction, which helps narrow the gap between our knowledge of friction on the microscopic and macroscopic scales. Here we show, by using noncontact dynamic force spectroscopy, the single capillary bridge generates noncontact friction via its shear interaction. The pinning–depinning dynamics of the nanobridge’s contact line produces nonviscous damping, which occurs even without normal load and dominates the capillary-induced hydrodynamic damping. The novel nanofriction mechanism may provide a deeper microscopic view of macroscopic friction in air where numerous asperities exist.


Friction is the force against sliding between two bodies in contact and the phenomenon spans several orders of magnitude from the nanometre scales of biological molecules and atomic contacts1,2,3 to the kilometre scales of earthquakes4, having scientific as well as technological importance5. In dry condition, the dominant microscopic mechanism for the contact friction is the nonlinear, thermally activated stick-slip dynamics of the contacting asperities, which increases the friction force logarithmically with the sliding velocity6,7. Recent studies have shown that there exists even the minute, noncontact energy dissipation at a nanometric separation due to the fluctuating electromagnetic fields8. Therefore, the contact-sliding friction in dry condition seems to be largely a matter of interactions between the objects at the direct contact interface.

In ambient condition, however, there always exists a third object between contact bodies, the capillary–condensed water bridge or meniscus9, which binds two nanoscale asperities and thereby strongly affects friction10,11. Such a humidity-assisted friction has been understood as associated with the thermally activated capillary condensation of water vapour into liquid water that occurs between hydrophilic surfaces in air12,13,14. For the contact sliding of a single asperity, the capillary-mediated friction decreases logarithmically with the velocity due to the proportionally diminishing bridge size and capillary attraction15,16. On the other hand, the water bridge can be also formed in the nanometric gap between two distant asperities17, with its nanometric height maintained constant, and thus results in the noncontact friction, unlike in dry condition, even in the absence of normal load on the solid–solid contact.

The liquid bridge has been usually considered to add an additional normal load, increasing the microscopic real contact area and thereby enhancing the overall friction10,11,18. However, such an indirect effect does not describe the friction that the bridges may produce directly between contact as well as noncontact nano-asperities. This direct contribution is important, in particular, not only because the distant asperities consist of the large part of the apparent contact area beyond the real contact area (Fig. 1a)19,20 but also because the water bridge can be easily formed in the gap of distant asperities with separation less than 10 nm in ambient condition21 (see also Supplementary Note 1). Although the noncontact friction mediated by a single water bridge is about 10% of contact friction due to a single asperity, as we shall show later, the overall contribution of noncontact asperities can be significant because they usually exist numerously due to the multi-asperity feature at the macroscopic contact interface. Therefore, for a better understanding of friction in air, it is critical to address the noncontact sliding friction that the single capillary bridge mediates, which helps the gap in our understanding of the microscopic and macroscopic scale friction.

Figure 1: Noncontact sliding friction resulting from capillary shear interaction.
figure 1

(a) Schematics of the microscopic interface between two sliding macroscopic bodies in contact in ambient condition. Within the nanoscale gap, numerous water nanobridges are formed by capillary condensation between two noncontact as well as contact asperities, and they produce the bridge-induced resistive force besides the solid–solid contact friction. (b) Experimental scheme of measuring the bridge-mediated noncontact friction. We used a homebuilt noncontact atomic force microscope that allows stable and controllable formation of the capillary water nanobrdige in the gap between the gold tip and mica substrate, and measures precisely the associated interaction forces. (c) Typical elastic keff and damping beffw coefficients as a function of the tip–sample distance z during (i) tip approach→(ii) capillary formation (at z=0)→(iii) tip retraction. (d,e) The force constants keff and beffw obtained at different relative humidity (RH). The bigger bridge (having the longer rupture distance) is formed at the higher RH (circles→triangles→diamonds). Here the tip–sample contact point is estimated as the position z≈−4.6 nm (see Supplementary Note 2 for details). Notice that in ce, the elasticity shows noticeable discrete-decrease behaviours, unlike the damping, during tip retraction before rupture, which may be attributed to the corresponding discrete decrease of the length (or the radius ) of the three-phase contact line at the tip–bridge interface under the constant volume condition, as first observed in ref. 17.

Here we study theoretically and experimentally the capillary ‘shear’ interaction of a single water nanobridge (Fig. 1b) that produces the noncontact sliding friction, by using a shear-mode noncontact atomic force microscope (AFM)17,22. The unique features of our approach include the following. First, the pure effects of the water bridge are measured by noncontact operation. Second, the velocity dependences are studied for the constant bridge volumes. Finally, quantitative description of the noncontact friction is made in terms of shear modulus, which enables quantitative comparison with the contact friction. We show that the bridge-mediated noncontact interaction produces the solid-like elasticity, as well as the novel nonviscous damping that originates from the molecular-scale pinning–depinning dynamics of the tip–bridge contact line.


Formation and detection of a nanosized water bridge

The noncontact AFM employs the quartz tuning fork oscillator, with a sharp tip attached, which has high stiffness (104 N m−1) and a high quality factor (103). Consequently, the system not only realizes the stable formation of the single capillary nanobridge with controlled height and volume17, avoiding the jump-to-contact instability typically experienced in soft cantilever-based AFM, but also allows sensitive measurement23 and quantitative analysis24 of the associated interactions. When the laterally oscillating tip approaches the mica substrate, a water nanobrdige is produced by capillary condensation in the tip–sample nanometric gap (Methods), causing a change in the measured quantities, the amplitude and phase of the tip oscillation. Once the nanobridge formation is observed, the tip retracts to avoid the tip–substrate hard contact, while the amplitude change and phase shift are recorded until the bridge is ruptured. The measured experimental data are analysed using the dynamic force spectroscopy (DFS) method25 to obtain quantitatively the associated bridge-mediated interactions.

Nanosized water bridge-mediated shear interaction

The quartz tuning fork-based DFS is ideal for our goal, because it allows high measurement sensitivity for the stiff mechanical oscillator and detects simultaneously and separately the conservative Fk and nonconservative Fb components of the total tip–liquid interaction force Fint (=Fk+Fb). Furthermore, by this technique, a wide sliding-velocity range is possible while the bridge volume is maintained constant. Specifically, this technique allows one to obtain ‘effective’ elastic keff and damping beff coefficients. The respective forces are then derived as Fk≈−keffx and , where x is the lateral displacement of the tip and v is the corresponding shear velocity22,24. Figure 1c shows the typically measured elasticity keff and beffw (here, w is the angular frequency of tip oscillation), and they exhibit an abrupt jump when the capillary condensation occurrs, which defines the position z=0. The interaction constants keff and beffw increase with the relative humidity (RH) or the rupture distance (that is, volume) of the bridge, as shown in Fig. 1d,e. Since v=0 when x=A (and also v=wA when x=0) for the harmonic motion of the tip (with its oscillation amplitude A), we can measure separately two instantaneous peak values of the oscillatory interaction force, Fk and Fb, at x=A and x=0, respectively; Fint=Fk≈−keffA at x=A and Fint=Fb≈−beffwA at x=0.

Mechanism of water bridge-mediated noncontact friction

Now, let us discuss the microscopic mechanisms of the liquid bridge-mediated shear interaction. At first, we show that the measured elastic and damping properties cannot be explained by the hydrodynamic interaction or capillary negative pressure exerted on the tip–bridge interfacial area σ. The hydrodynamic viscous drag causes dissipative damping on the shearing interfacial area under the usual assumption of no-slip boundary condition, and the corresponding damping coefficient, when expressed in the same unit of the elasticity, is given by , where μ is the viscosity of water and the bridge height (Fig. 2a). While there have been reports on the substantial enhancement of μ under subnano-confinement, the present confining height is much longer (>4.5 nm). Therefore, using the bulk viscosity of water26,27,28 and the relevant quantities, σ=π(15 nm)2 and =6 nm, which can be obtained by using the theoretical formalism and estimation procedure of the tip–sample distance developed in detail in the Supplementary Notes 2 and 3, we obtain , 105 times smaller than the measured value of about 1 N m−1. Moreover, the increased viscous damping that occurs near the contact line alters the contact angle as , where is the dynamically varying contact angle, the equilibrium contact angle, Ca the capillary number and l is a logarithmic factor29. For the highest l100, the angle change is at most a few 10−3 rad, which is still 104 times less than the measurement (Supplementary Note 4). In addition, since the negative pressure of the bridge exerts an attractive force in normal direction to the tip surface, its lateral shear contribution is also negligible.

Figure 2: Contact-line-induced capillary shear interaction.
figure 2

(a) Schematics of the bridge under shear, where the three-phase contact line at the tip–liquid interface induces the restoring elastic force as well as the nonviscous dissipative force due to the contact-line dynamics at the molecular scale. Inset shows an imaginary cylindrical column of the bridge for a simple estimate of its elasticity. (b) Characteristic representation of the contact-line-induced shear force. While the bridge with its contact line pinned exhibits the elastic response (dashed line), the moving contact line induces the dissipative force associated with its pinning–depinning kinetics and splits the force–distance curve depending on the moving direction (red curve), resulting in the force hysteresis. The area of the hysteresis represents the dissipated energy associated with the nonviscous damping beffw, whereas the tilt of the hysteresis is the shear elasticity keff.

As an alternative interaction mechanism, we now demonstrate that the contact line of the tip–bridge interface can generate simultaneously bridge elasticity as well as nonviscous dissipation. First, to derive the elastic component of the capillary shear force, let us consider simply a cylindrical column of water, whose contact line is pinned on the sliding flat tip surface (inset of Fig. 2a) (refer to Supplementary Note 5 for a general round tip). The surface energy Ul with respect to the shear displacement x can be exactly solved as, , where is the surface tension of water, the radius of the contact line and is the complete elliptic integral of the second kind (see Supplementary Note 6 for derivation). The energy gradient then gives the maximum value of elastic force at x=A,

and . With the parameters, =15 nm and =6 nm (see Supplementary Notes 2 and 3), we find keff≈0.6 N m−1 in excellent agreement with the experimental results (Fig. 1d).

Besides the pinning of the contact line responsible for the elasticity, however, there can also occur the depinning following each pinning. The pinning–depinning (or stick-slip) kinetics of the contact line induces an energy dissipation and is described by the ‘molecular kinetic theory’30. Essentially, the theory provides a relation between the contact-line velocity V (relative to the tip surface) and the applied force per unit length on the contact line , given by , where is the dynamic contact angle on the moving contact line. Here this nonlinear pinning–depinning dynamics includes two intrinsic parameters, the length of activated jump λ and the activation energy U of the jump. The scale factor V0 is given by V0λkBT/h, where kB is the Boltzmann constant and h the Plank constant.

For a given U and λ, we can then derive the shear damping force Fb as a function of V by summing up fl around the contact line. The larger tip motion (or higher v=wA) induces the larger contact-line force, and the larger imposed force triggers more pinning–depinning processes at the contact line30,31. This microscopic mechanism leads to the overall increase of the velocity V along the direction of the exerted force. We thus conjecture that VV0exp(–U/kBT)≡Vi for A→0 (that is, no external perturbation) and VwA for A→∞ (that is, infinitely fast and long travel of the contact line) at the tip position x=0 (or at the tip velocity is wA), where the bridge experiences a negligible elastic restoring force (equation (1)). Then, introducing an empirical parameter 0≤α(A)≤1, the degree of slip, we can construct a linear relation between V and A, as V=Vi+αwA, where α(A=0)=0 and α(A→∞)=1. With this relation, we then obtain the maximum frictional force Fb at x=0 and v>0 as a function of A (Supplementary Note 5),

Here we find Fb is proportional to and exhibits the logarithmic dependence on the tip velocity wA. Notice that for v<0, due to the symmetry, resulting in the force hysteresis (Fig. 2b). We also find .

In summary, the total contact-line-induced shear force is analytically given by the sum of the elastic (equation (1)) and damping (equation (2)) forces, which are our main results. They describe how the contact line of the capillary bridge plays the key role in the shear interaction between two noncontact sliding surfaces: whereas the interfacial energy change due to the liquid-surface elongation during the contact-line pinning produces the restoring force Fk (equation (1)), the microscopic pinning–depinning process of the contact line results in the nonviscous friction Fb (equation (2)). For our oscillatory measurement of the interaction forces, , the elastic part Fk contributes to the in-phase component, while the damping part Fb to the out-of-phase component, which are detected separately by the DFS method. Here we note that the pinning–depinning occurs at the contact line, where water molecules hop microscopically over the pinning sites. However, water molecules inside the contact line do not hop under no-slip boundary condition, which is usually assumed between a hydrophilic surface and water. Therefore, because the hydrodynamic viscous damping is 104105 times smaller than the measured damping, as discussed earlier, we can consider the experimentally measured interaction originates from the three-phase contact line.

Noncontact friction via three-phase contact line

To justify the proposed microscopic mechanism of the bridge-mediated noncontact friction, we have investigated the dependence of the interaction force on the shearing amplitude A. The tip first approaches to form the capillary nanobridge and during its subsequent retraction, the tip stops at a given position z=1 nm (or the bridge height ≈5.6 nm) for measurements of keff and beffw while varying A (up to 30 nm). Figure 3 presents the behaviours of the force constants keff and beffw, and the corresponding forces |Fk| and |Fb|, which are normalized respectively to k0 and b0w for convenience (here, k0 and b0w are the initial values of keff and beffw obtained at A=A0≈0.5 nm). For the damping results, we used three fitting parameters U, λ and α, and our model reproduces excellently the measured beffw (red curves in Fig. 3). On the other hand, for the elasticity part, we used no adjustable parameters, and the keff values show qualitative agreement although they are overall slightly larger than the results for the simple column model of the bridge (black curves in Fig. 3).

Figure 3: Comparison of the theory of capillary shear interaction with the experimental results.
figure 3

(a) Shear-amplitude dependence of keff and beffw. The normalized keff (black squares) and beffw (red dots) results are plotted at z=1 nm versus A for the water bridge formed at RH=30%. The contact-line-induced capillary shear interactions, black (equation (1)) and red (equation (2)) curves, reproduce well the experimental results (black squares and red dots). (b) Shear-amplitude (or shear-velocity) dependence of |Fk| and |Fb|. The inset shows the logarithmic increase of the damping force FbbeffwA (red dots) with A (that is, wA), which is attributed to the molecular pinning–depinning kinetics of the contact line. Here the normalization factors, k0 and b0w, are the initial values of keff and beffw, respectively, obtained at AA0≈0.5 nm. Error bars indicate s.d. from four independent experiments.

In Fig. 3a, we observe two characteristic behaviours of keff and beffw. First, they both exhibit maximum values in the limit of small A. Second, the elastic coefficient decays faster than the damping constant with respect to A. These features are expected from the functional forms of equation (1) and equation (2), where both Fk and Fb initially increase linearly with A, but the force increments are suppressed as A increases. That is, while Fk(≈keffA) converges to a specific value as A→∞, Fk() increases logarithmically with A, so that Fk/A is expected to decay faster than Fb/A. We also notice that beffw initially increases slightly from A=0.5 nm to below A=10 nm, in which the higher rate of depinning occurs at the larger A. Therefore, α(A) increases up to 1 for A<10 nm, but α(A)=1 remains constant beyond A=10 nm. Indeed, we fit excellently the experimental data beffw by using α(A) such that α(A) is the linear curve connecting two points, α=0.6 at A=0.5 nm and α=1 at A=10 nm for A≤10 nm, whereas α(A)=1 for A>10 nm (red curves in Fig. 3).

Figure 3b presents the corresponding behaviours of the capillary shear forces versus A (or equivalently the shear velocity wA). Interestingly, the capillary shear friction increases logarithmically with the sliding velocity (see inset), similarly to the stick-slip contact friction in dry condition, despite the constant volume of the capillary bridge during measurements (Supplementary Note 7), which is realized due to the fast tip oscillation and the resulting short measurement time (that is, lock-in detection at w). This indicates that the logarithmic increase of the noncontact friction, resulting from the pinning–depinning ‘hopping’ processes of the contact line, shares similar physical origins with the stick-slip mechanism of contact friction in dry condition. Interestingly, we observe this contact-line-induced friction may account for the recent solid–solid contact-sliding experiment on mica, where the logarithmic force increase was observed for constant normal load at low velocity32. In contrast, for sliding contact friction at relatively high velocity in ambient condition11, the force decreases logarithmically with velocity, which is attributed to the reduced friction as a result of the proportionately rapid diminishing of the capillary bridges due to evaporation of the contact-sliding meniscus and insufficient nucleation time for a meniscus formation15. Notice that at a farther tip–sample distance of z=5.2 nm, where the evaporation of the water bridge is more favourable so that the bridge becomes smaller, we observe the force starts decreasing soon after initial increase (Supplementary Note 7).

Numerical calculation of the two intrinsic parameters, λ and U, indicates that the pinning–depinning processes of the contact line is associated with the dynamics at the molecular scale. In such a molecular process, λ, the mean distance between neighbouring pinning sites, should be an atomic-scale distance (<1 nm). Moreover, it has been argued by Blake and De Coninck that the activation energy per unit area is just the work of adhesion Wa33, U/λ2≈Wa, where . Indeed, we obtain λ=0.6 nm and U=14.7kBT by fitting equation (2) to the experimental data for A>10 nm, which gives U/λ2=0.19 N m−1≈2γWa, where γ=0.072 N m−1 at 20 °C. In addition, when depinning occurs, the force per unit length on the contact line is also expected to be the order of U/λ2, which is supported by equation (2), . Consequently, the friction force Fb can be attributed as due to thermal activation of the water molecules at the contact line, being adsorbed and desorbed over the atomic scale λ=0.6 nm on the gold surface of the probe. It is interesting to observe that the sizable nonviscous damping that we observed even at A<1 nm already indicates the existence of the atomic-scale pinning–depinning processes (also refer Fig. 4).

Figure 4: The contact-line radius dependence of keff and beffw.
figure 4

We measured keff (black squares) and beffw (red squares) for small amplituide A<1 nm at z=1 nm while increasing RH from 2 to 60%, and plotted the force constants with respect to the corresponding , where is numerically calculated based on the Young–Laplace equation35,36. The solid lines are the eye guides, showing the linear dependency on above =15 nm, as predicted by equations (1) and (2). The inset presents the sizable elastic (black) and dissipative (red) shear modulus of the capillary-induced noncontact interaction, obtained from the measured keff and beffw. Error bars represent s.d. for the measured values of keff and beffw in the range of z=1±0.5 nm, which incorporates the maximum variation of ±0.5 nm in determination of the absolute capillary-condensation position relative to the sample at different RHs (refer to Supplementary Fig. 5).

Notice that water molecules near the contact line undergo incessantly repeating pinning–depinning (that is, adsorption–desorption or stick-slip) motion caused by the moving tip, which results in resistive frictional force. Such a friction at the molecular scale is manifested as the continuous and smooth energy dissipation at the macroscopic scale, described by the damping coefficient beff, and it is responsible for the substantial energy dissipation that cannot be accounted for by usual hydrodynamic dissipation. A similar continuous macroscopic manifestation of the microscopic pinning–depinning processes as the energy dissipation has been shown in a different system that consists of a colloidal particle at the liquid interface34, where enhanced energy dissipation associated with the contact line was also observed beyond the predictions of the hydrodynamic viscous damping.

By varying RH, we observe that the noncontact sliding interaction can be enhanced by an order of magnitude with the increase of RH from 2 to 60%. Because the larger volume of the liquid bridge is formed at higher RH (Fig. 1d,e), the contact-line radius increases with RH for a fixed tip–sample distance. Specifically, by the numerical calculation based on the Young–Laplace equation35,36, we find varies from 7 to 32 nm as RH increases from 2 to 60% at z=1 nm or ≈5.6 nm (see Supplementary Fig. 5 for details on a fine control of ). In Fig. 4, we present the interaction coefficients obtained at z=1 nm as a function of , measured for small A (<1 nm), where keff and beffw at RH=60% become 5 and 10 times larger than the values at RH=2%, respectively.

Figure 4 shows that keff and beffw are linearly proportional to at >15 nm. This linearity is expected because the forces, equations (1) and (2), are linearly dependent on . Notice that the linear behaviour holds above a certain value of , which is because the current model of the bridge-induced interaction does not take into account the detailed geometry of the water bridge. For example, for the real geometry of a bridge, there exists a critical value R0 for the minimum contact-line radius, at which the neck diameter of the bridge vanishes and thus Fk=Fb=0 at =R0, unlike equations (1) and (2) that predict the forces become zero only when =0, which cannot hold below R0. Moreover, the continuum material model of the liquid bridge may break down for <15 nm, where the substantially differing behaviours of keff and beffw are observed (Fig. 4), so that the discrete nature of the nanosized matter should be considered (see ref. 37).


For a unifying understanding, let us compare the bridge-mediated noncontact friction with the solid–solid contact friction, both of which possess the similar mechanism of the pinning–depinning or the stick-slip dynamics. The contact friction is characterized by the ‘interfacial shear strength’, which is the friction divided by the real solid–solid contact area and is typically of the order of 108 Pa38,39. For the present noncontact friction, we obtain the complex shear modulus G*, which is defined as the ratio of stress to strain and is represented by the complex sum of the storage modulus G′ and the loss modulus G″, that is, G*=G′+G″. While G′ represents the measure of the bridge resistance to being deformed elastically against the applied shear force, G″ shows the corresponding energy dissipation with respect to the same strain of the bridge. This leads to  Pa and  Pa, which are similar in magnitude to those of rubber (inset, Fig. 4). Notice that G″ is 104 times larger than the bulk water, a substantial enhancement over the hydrodynamic effects between the tip and bridge. Interestingly, we emphasize that the noncontact shear dissipative modulus of a single bridge is up to 10% of the contact modulus, indicating that the noncontact friction may even dominate the contact friction depending on the conditions such as the number of capillary bridges.

In conclusion, we present the microscopic mechanism of the noncontact friction where the capillary shear interaction plays a key role. In particular, the novel nonviscous damping is attributed to the nonlinear pinning–depinning molecular processes of the tip–bridge contact line, which increases logarithmically with the shear velocity, as similarly observed in the atomic-scale ‘stick-slip’ friction between solids in contact in dry condition. Notice that although the previous contact friction experiments in humid condition exhibit logarithmic decrease due to the reduced capillary-adhesion effect with velocity16, the present contact-line-induced friction may occur at the initial, low-velocity stage of the contact sliding where the capillary shear is nonnegligible. Our results offer a new mechanism of the nanotribology in ambient condition, which can be used for better microscopic understanding of both the macroscopic friction where numerous asperities exist and the rheological properties of the nanoscale interfacial fluids, and for designing and controlling the micro/nano electro-mechanical systems.


Experimental details

We used an etched gold tip and mica substrate in AFM operation, and they were prepared as follows: the gold tip was made by electrochemical etching in a 3.5-M HCl solution, which typically produced a tip diameter of 400500 nm. The tip was attached to one of two prongs of the quartz tuning fork. For the mica substrate, freshly cleaved mica was rinsed using dilute acid 5% (acetic acid) and then using deionized water. The tip and sample were placed in a homebuilt air-tight humidity-controlled metallic chamber at RH=2%, where they were dried for several hours before making measurements. The metallic chamber is equipped with two inlets for dry and H2O-saturated nitrogen gases and with one outlet connected to a vacuum pump. By varying the gas flows through the inlets, we control the relative humidity in the chamber. In addition, we also performed the experiment using a cantilever Si tip with a smaller radius of curvature, which produced a correspondingly smaller bridge and smaller force constants were measured. Further, when we used a hydrophobic, highly ordered pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) substrate instead of hydrophilic mica, the capillary-condensed water bridge was not produced, so that there is no bridge-mediated contribution to friction.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Lee, M. et al. Noncontact friction via capillary shear interaction at nanoscale. Nat. Commun. 6:7359 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8359 (2015).


  1. 1

    Vanossi, A., Manini, N., Urbakh, M., Zapperi, S. & Tosatti, E. Modeling friction: from nanoscale to mesoscale. Rev. Mod. Phys. Colloquium 85, 529–552 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Urbakh, M., Klafter, J., Gourdon, D. & Israelachvili, J. N. The nonlinear nature of friction. Nature 430, 525–528 (2004).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Bormuth, V., Varga, V., Howard, J. & Schaffer, E. Protein friction limits diffusive and directed movements of kinesin motors on microtubules. Science 325, 870–873 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Scholz, C. H. Earthquakes and friction laws. Nature 391, 37–42 (1998).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Urbakh, M. & Meyer, E. Nanotribology: the renaissance of friction. Nat. Mater. 9, 8–10 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Gnecco, E. et al. Velocity dependence of atomic friction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1172–1175 (2000).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Bouhacina, T. et al. Tribological behavior of a polymer grafted on silanized silica probed with a nanotip. Phys. Rev. B 56, 7694–7703 (1997).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Volokitin, A. I. & Persson, B. N. J. Near-field radiative heat transfer and noncontact friction. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1291–1329 (2007).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Israelachvili, J. N. Intermolecular and Surface Forces Academic Press (2003).

  10. 10

    Persson, B. N. J. Sliding Friction: Physical Principles and Applications Springer (2000).

  11. 11

    Riedo, E., Levy, F. & Brune, H. Kinetics of capillary condensation in nanoscopic sliding friction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 185505 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Bocquet, L., Charlaix, E., Ciliberto, S. & Crassous, J. Moisture-induced ageing in granular media and the kinetics of capillary condensation. Nature 396, 735–737 (1998).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Restagno, F., Bocquet, L. & Biben, T. Metastability and nucleation in capillary condensation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2433–2436 (2000).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Jang, J., Schatz, G. C. & Ratner, M. A. How narrow can a meniscus be? Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 085504 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Szoszkiewicz, R. & Riedo, E. Nucleation time of nanoscale water bridges. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 135502 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Noel, O., Mazeran, P.-E. & Nasrallah, H. Sliding velocity dependence of adhesion in a nanometer-sized contact. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 015503 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Choe, H. et al. Formation, manipulation, and elasticity measurement of a nanometric column of water molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 187801 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Sirghi, L. Effect of capillary-condensed water on the dynamic friction force at nanoasperity contacts. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 3755–3757 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Rubinstein, S. M., Cohen, G. & Fineberg, J. Detachment fronts and the onset of dynamic friction. Nature 430, 1005–1009 (2004).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Mo, Y., Turner, K. T. & Szlufarska, I. Friction laws at the nanoscale. Nature 457, 1116–1119 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Sirghi, L., Szoszkiewicz, R. & Riedo, E. Volume of a nanoscale water bridge. Langmuir 22, 1093–1098 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Lee, M., Sung, B., Hashemi, N. & Jhe, W. Study of a nanoscale water cluster by atomic force microscopy. Faraday Discuss. 141, 415–421 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Lee, M., Jahng, J., Kim, K. & Jhe, W. Quantitative atomic force measurement with a quartz tuning fork. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 023117 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Lee, M. & Jhe, W. General theory of amplitude-modulation atomic force microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 036104 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Garca, R. & Pérez, R. Dynamic atomic force microscopy method. Surf. Sci. Rep. 47, 197–301 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Raviv, U. & Klein, J. Fluidity of bound hydration layers. Science 297, 1540–1542 (2002).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Raviv, U., Laurat, P. & Klein, J. Fluidity of water confined to subnanometre films. Nature 413, 51–53 (2001).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Leng, Y. & Cummings, P. T. Fluidity of hydration layers nanoconfined between mica surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 026101 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Cox, R. G. The dynamics of the spreading of liquids on a solid surface. J. Fluid Mech. 168, 169–194 (1986).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Blake, T. D. & Haynes, J. M. Kinetics of liquid/liquid displacement. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 30, 421–423 (1969).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Gao, P. & Feng, J. J. Enhanced slip on a patterned substrate due to depinning of contact line. Phys. Fluids 21, 102102 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Nasrallah, H. Capillary Adhesion and Friction: an Approach With the AFM Circular Mode PhD thesis, Univ. Maine (2011).

  33. 33

    Blake, T. D. & De Coninck, J. The influence of solid-liquid interactions on dynamic wetting. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 96, 21–36 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Kaz, D. M., McGorty, R., Mani, M., Brenner, M. P. & Manoharan, V. N. Physical ageing of the contact line on colloidal particles at liquid interfaces. Nat. Mater. 11, 138–142 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Stifter, T., Marti, O. & Bhushan, B. Theoretical investigation of the distance dependence of capillary and van der Waals forces in scanning force microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 62, 13667–13673 (2000).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Willett, C. D., Adams, M. J., Johnson, S. A. & Seville, J. P. K. Capillary bridges between two spherical bodies. Langmuir 16, 9396–9405 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Jang, J., Ratner, M. A. & Schatz, G. C. J. Atomic-scale roughness effect on capillary force in atomic force microscopy. Phys. Chem. B 110, 659–662 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Carpick, R. W., Agrait, Ogletree, N. D. F. & Salmeron, M. Variation of the interfacial shear strength and adhesion of a nanometer-sized contact. Langmuir 12, 3334–3340 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Carpick, R. W., Ogletree, D. F. & Salmseron, M. Lateral stiffness: a new nanomechanical measurement for the determination of shear strengths with friction force microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 1548–1550 (1997).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to Gunsang Geon and Corey Stambaugh for invaluable discussions. This work was supported in part by the National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No. 2009-0083512).

Author information




M.L. developed the noncontact AFM and theoretical tool. M.L., B.K. and J.K. carried out experiments. W.J. designed and directed the research. M.L. and W.J. analysed and interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wonho Jhe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-5, Supplementary Notes 1-7 and Supplementary References (PDF 692 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, M., Kim, B., Kim, J. et al. Noncontact friction via capillary shear interaction at nanoscale. Nat Commun 6, 7359 (2015).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing