Abstract
The measurement of a quantum state poses a unique challenge for experimentalists. Recently, the technique of ‘direct measurement’ was proposed for characterizing a quantum state in situ through sequential weak and strong measurements. While this method has been used for measuring polarization states, its real potential lies in the measurement of states with a large dimensionality. Here we show the practical direct measurement of a highdimensional state vector in the discrete basis of orbital angular momentum. Through weak measurements of orbital angular momentum and strong measurements of angular position, we measure the complex probability amplitudes of a pure state with a dimensionality, d=27. Further, we use our method to directly observe the relationship between rotations of a state vector and the relative phase between its orbitalangularmomentum components. Our technique has important applications in highdimensional classical and quantum information systems and can be extended to characterize other types of large quantum states.
Introduction
The measurement problem in quantum mechanics has led us to constantly redefine what we mean by a quantum state^{1,2}. The act of measuring a quantum state disturbs it irreversibly, a phenomenon referred to as collapse of the wavefunction. For example, precisely measuring the position of a singlephoton results in a photon with a broad superposition of momenta. Consequently, no quantum system can be fully characterized through a single measurement. An established method of characterizing a quantum state involves making a diverse set of measurements on a collection of identically prepared quantum states, followed by postprocessing of the data. This process, known as quantum state tomography^{3}, is akin to its classical counterpart of imaging a threedimensional object using many twodimensional (2D) projections. A novel alternative to tomography was recently demonstrated, in which the complex probability amplitude of a pure quantum state was directly obtained as an output of the measurement apparatus, bypassing the complicated postprocessing step^{4}. In this method, the position of an ensemble of identically prepared photons was weakly measured^{5,6}, which caused a minimal disturbance to their momentum. A subsequent strong measurement of their momentum revealed all the information necessary to characterize their state in the continuous bases of position and momentum.
While a careful study comparing direct measurement with quantum state tomography is still lacking, it has already shown promise as a simple and elegant method for characterizing a quantum state in the continuous positionmomentum basis^{4} as well as the 2D polarization basis^{7}. Here, we extend this novel technique to characterize a photon in the discrete, unbounded state–space of orbital angular momentum (OAM). Photons carrying OAM have been the subject of much recent scientific attention^{8,9,10,11}. The discrete, high dimensionality of the OAM Hilbert space provides a much larger information capacity for quantum information systems^{12,13} as compared with the conventionally used 2D state–space of polarization. More significantly, a larger dimensionality allows for an increased tolerance to eavesdropping in quantum key distribution^{14}. Photons entangled in OAM^{15,16} are prime candidates not only for such high capacity, high security communication systems but also for fundamental tests of quantum mechanics^{17}. Thus, it is essential that fast, accurate and efficient methods for characterizing such highdimensional states be developed.
In this Article, we use weak measurements of OAM followed by a strong measurement of angular position to directly measure the complex probability amplitudes of a 27dimensional state in the OAM basis. In this manner, we are able to obtain both the amplitude and the phase of each OAM component within our state–space. In addition, our technique enables us to measure rotations of a state vector in the natural basis of OAM. Rotation of the state by a fixed angle manifests as an OAM modedependent phase, illustrating the relationship between the angular momentum operator and rotations in quantum mechanics^{18}.
Results
Theory of direct measurement in the OAM basis
We can express the state of our photon as a superposition of states in the OAM basis as
where are complex probability amplitudes. In direct analogy to a photon’s position and linear momentum, the angular position and OAM of a photon form a discrete Fourier conjugate pair^{19,20}. Consequently, any OAM basis state is mutually unbiased with respect to any angular position basis state θ—that is, their inner product always has the same magnitude. This property allows us to define a strategic quantity c=, which is constant with respect to for θ_{0}=0. By multiplying our state above by this constant and inserting the identity, we can expand it as
Notice here that we have introduced the quantity , which is proportional to the probability amplitude from equation (1). This is known as the OAM weak value^{5,6} and is equal to the average result obtained by making a weak projection in the OAM basis followed by a strong measurement in the conjugate basis of angular position (θ). In this manner, the scaled complex probability amplitudes can be directly obtained by measuring the OAM weak value for a finite set of . Following this procedure, the constant c can be eliminated by renormalizing the state Ψ. In order to measure such weak values, we utilize a twosystem Hamiltonian where the OAM of a photon is coupled to its polarization, which serves as a measurement pointer^{4}. We perform a weak projection of OAM by rotating by a small angle the polarization of the OAM mode to be measured. Following this, a strong measurement of angular position is performed via a post selection of states with θ=θ_{0}. The OAM weak value is read out by measuring the average change in the photon’s linear and circular polarization (see Methods section for details).
Experimental procedure for measuring the OAM weak value
Performing a weak measurement of OAM at the singlephoton level is an experimental challenge. In order to do so, we first use an optical geometric transformation in combination with a beamcopying technique to efficiently separate the OAM modes of our photons^{21,22,23}. This process is depicted in Fig. 1 for a single OAM mode. R1 and R2 are custom refractive elements that transform an OAM mode with azimuthal phase variation to a momentum mode with position phase variation . Following a Fourier transform lens (L1), a fanout hologram implemented on a phaseonly spatial light modulator (SLM2) creates three adjacent copies of this momentum mode^{24,25}. Following another Fourier transform lens (not shown in Fig. 1), SLM3 is used to remove a relative phase difference introduced in the beamcopying process between the three copies. The resultant momentum mode is three times the size of the original, while also having three times the phase gradient of the original. A second lens (L2) Fourier transforms this larger momentum mode into a position mode at SLM4. This results in wellseparated OAM modes () having less than 10% overlap on average with neighbouring modes (±1) (see Methods section for details).
The weak projection of an OAM mode is performed by rotating its polarization by an angle α=π/9 (a strong projection would correspond to α=π/2). We use SLM4 and a quarterwave plate (QWP0) in double pass to carry out this polarization rotation^{26}. QWP1 and HWP1 are used to remove any ellipticity introduced by transmission and reflection through the nonpolarizing beam splitter. A strong measurement of angular position is performed by a 10μm slit placed in the Fourier plane of lens L3. Since the plane of the slit is conjugate to the plane where the OAM modes are spatially separated (SLM4), a measurement of the linear position by the slit is equivalent to a measurement of angular position.
The average change in the photon’s linear and circular polarization is proportional to Re and Im, respectively^{4}. If the initial polarization of the photon is vertical, the OAM weak value is given by
where α is the rotation angle, and are the first and second Pauli operators and s_{f} is the final polarization state of the photon (see Methods section for detailed derivation of equation 3). In order to measure the expectation values of and , we transform to the linear and circular polarization bases with QWP2 and HWP2 and measure the difference between orthogonal polarization components with a polarizing beam splitter and two singlephoton avalanche detectors. In this manner, we directly obtain the scaled complex probability amplitudes by scanning the weak measurement through values of ±13. While the size of the OAM state–space is unbounded, we are limited to a dimensionality of d=27 by our mode transformation technique.
Direct measurement of a 27dimensional OAM state
The authors of the first work on direct measurement showed this technique to give identical results for heralded single photons and attenuated coherent states^{4}. Therefore, in our experiment, photons from a highly attenuated HeNe laser are tailored into a highdimensional quantum state by impressing a specific OAM distribution on them with SLM1 and a 4f system of lenses (Fig. 1)^{27}. The laser power is reduced such that probabilistically only one photon is present in our apparatus at any given time. First, we create a sinc distribution of OAM using a wedgeshaped mask on the SLM. Just as a rectangular aperture diffracts light into a sinc distribution of linear momenta, photons diffracting through an angular aperture of width Δθ result in a state vector with a sinc distribution of OAM probability amplitudes^{19}
This distribution has a width given by Δ=2π/Δθ, which refers to the mode index of its first null. Using an angular aperture of width Δθ=2π/9 rad (inset of Fig. 2b), we create such an ensemble of identical photons and perform the direct measurement procedure on them. The measured real and imaginary parts of the state vector are plotted in Fig. 2a as a function of . Using these quantities, we calculate the probability density and the phase φ(), which are plotted in Fig. 2b,c. The width of the sincsquared fit to the probability density is measured to be Δ=9.26±0.21, which is very close to the value of Δ=9 predicted from theory.
The measured phase plotted in Fig. 2c has a quadratic form with πphase jumps at OAM mode numbers =±9. These mode numbers correspond to the probability density minima in Fig. 2b, which is where the sincshaped amplitude crosses the x axis and changes sign. The asymmetric quadratic feature in the phase appears due to small misalignments in our optical system. A 4f imaging system (not shown in Fig. 1) is used to magnify the Fourier plane of lens L2 on SLM4. A misalignment in the z axis of this imaging system appears as a quadratic phase. Further, the asymmetry in the phase is due to a firstorder tilt aberration in our optical system, which is simply a result of the plane of SLM2 not being perfectly parallel to the plane of SLM4. Taking these two alignment imperfections into account, we use a quadratic model of the form ax^{2}+bx+c in order to calculate a fit to the phase using a leastsquares fitting algorithm in Matlab. Theoretical fits are plotted as blue lines in Fig. 2c. As can be seen, the phase error is unavoidably large when the amplitude approaches zero.
Direct measurement of rotations in the OAM basis
We now use this technique to analyse the effect of rotation on a photon carrying a broad range of angular momenta. Rotation of a state vector by an angle θ_{0} can be expressed by the unitary operator , where is the angular momentum operator. Operating on our quantum state Ψ with , we get
Thus, rotation by an angle θ_{0} manifests as an dependent phase on the OAM basis. For this reason, the angular momentum operator is called the generator of rotations under the paraxial approximation^{28}. To measure this phase, we create a rotated state vector by rotating our angular aperture by an angle θ_{+}=π/9 rad (inset of Fig. 3b). Then, we perform the direct measurement procedure as before and measure the real and imaginary parts of the rotated state vector as a function of (Fig. 3a). The probability density and phase of the state vector are calculated and plotted in Fig. 3b,c. For clarity, we subtract the phase of the zero rotation case (Fig. 2c) from our phase reading, so the effect of rotation is clear. Barring experimental error, the amplitude does not change significantly from the unrotated case (Fig. 2b). However, the phase of the OAM distribution exhibits a distinct dependent phase ramp with a slope of 0.373±0.007 rad per mode. This is in close agreement with theory, which predicts the phase to have a form φ()=±π/9, corresponding to a phase ramp with a slope of ±0.35 rad per mode. A linear fit to the phase is calculated by the process of χ^{2} minimization, which takes into account the phase error at each point. This process is repeated for a negative rotation angle θ_{−}=−π/9 rad, which results in a mostly unchanged probability density but an dependent phase ramp as expected with a negative slope of −0.404±0.007 rad per mode (Fig. 3d–f).
These results clearly illustrate the relationship between phase and rotation in the OAM basis in that every component acquires a phase proportional to the azimuthal quantum number . The measured slopes in both cases are slightly larger than those expected from theory possibly due to errors introduced in the geometrical transformation that is used to spatially separate the OAM modes. The modesorting process is extremely sensitive to the choice of axis, and a very small displacement of the transforming elements R1 and R2 can propagate as a phase error.
Discussion
In conclusion, through weak measurements of OAM and strong measurements of angular position, we have measured the complex probability amplitudes that completely characterize a pure quantum state in the highdimensional bases of OAM and angular position. Using our technique, we have also measured the effects of rotation on a 27dimensional state vector in the OAM basis. The rotation manifests as an OAM modedependent phase and allows us to observe the action of the angular momentum operator as a generator of rotations^{18}. While we have directly measured pure states of OAM, this method can be extended to perform measurements of mixed or general quantum states^{7,29}. By scanning the strong measurement of angular position as well, one can measure the Dirac distribution, which is informationally equivalent to the density matrix of a quantum state^{30,31}. Further, photons entangled in OAM can be measured by extending this technique to two photons. In this case, one would need to perform independent weak and strong measurements on each photon, followed by a joint detection scheme for the polarization measurement. It is important to mention that while we have used a quantum description for the direct measurement method, it is perfectly explained using classical wave mechanics^{32}. However, the quantum mechanical description is simpler, more elegant and extendable to systems that do not have a classical description.
Direct measurement may offer distinct advantages over conventional methods of quantum state characterization such as tomography. This method does not require a global reconstruction, a step that involves prohibitively long processing times for highdimensional quantum states such as those of OAM^{33,34}. Consequently, the quantum state is more accessible in that it can be measured locally as a function of OAM quantum number , as in our experiment. However, a detailed quantitative comparison between direct measurement and tomography will require careful consideration of parameters such as state reconstruction fidelity and will be the subject of future work. These advantages may allow us to use direct measurement for characterizing very large quantum states of OAM much more efficiently, with significant potential applications in highdimensional quantum and classical communication systems^{13,35,36}. Furthermore, the direct measurement procedure is not just limited to optical systems such as ours and can be used for the characterization of other highdimensional quantum systems.
Methods
Experimental details
Elements R1 and R2 are freeform refractive elements made out of Poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) that map polar coordinates (r, φ) to rectilinear coordinates (x, y) through the logpolar mapping x=a(φ mod 2π) and y=−a ln(r/b) (ref. 22). These are used for transforming OAM modes with azimuthal phase variation exp(iφ) to plane wave modes with position phase variation exp(ix/a). R1 unwraps the phase and R2 removes a residual aberration introduced in the unwrapping process. These elements were machined using a Nanotech ultra precision lathe in combination with a Nanotech NFTS6000 fast tool servo. The optical thickness of element R1 can be written as a function of (x, y) as^{23}
where f is the focal length of the lens integrated into both elements. This lens performs the Fourier transform operation that is required between the unwrapping and phasecorrecting procedures^{22}. The two free parameters, a and b, dictate the size and position of the transformed beam. The optical thickness of element R2 can be similarly written as
where u and v are spatial cartesian coordinates in the output plane. The distance between these two elements must be exactly f, and the elements must be aligned precisely along the same optical axis. For this reason, they are mounted in a cage system with fine position and rotation controls.
After element R2, the component OAM modes of the photon still have an overlap of ~20%. This is due to the finite size of the transformed momentum mode, which is bounded by the function rect (x/2πa). A fanout hologram^{24,25} implemented on a phaseonly SLM2 creates three adjacent copies of the momentum mode. The fanout hologram is calculated from values given in Prongue et al.^{24} and Romero and Dickey^{37}. The three copies generated by SLM2 have a phase offset from one another, which is removed by a phasecorrecting hologram implemented on SLM3. The larger momentum modes created by this process result in smaller position modes when Fourier transformed by a lens.
SLM1, SLM2 and SLM4 are Holoeye PLUTO phaseonly SLMs antireflection coated for visible light. These SLMs have a spatial resolution of 1,920 × 1,080 pixels and a pixel size of 8 μm. These are used for mode generation^{27}, beam copying (fanout)^{24} and polarization rotation^{26}. SLM3 is a Cambridge Correlator SDE1024 liquidcrystalonsilicon SLM with a resolution of 1,024 × 768 pixels. This SLM is used as the phasecorrector for the fanout hologram, as the lower resolution is sufficient for this process. The quarter and halfwave plates used in our experiment are zeroorder wave plates manufactured by Thorlabs and optimized for a wavelength of 633 nm. The slit used for post selection is 10μm wide and is also manufactured by Thorlabs. The singlephoton avalanche detectors are Perkin Elmer SPCMAQRH14 modules with a dark count rate of 100 counts s^{−1}.
OAM weakvalue derivation
Here we derive the relationship between the OAM weak value and expectation values of the and Pauli operators (equation (3)). The von Neumann formulation can be used to describe the coupling between the OAM (system) and polarization (pointer) observables^{1,38}. The product Hamilton describing this interaction can be written as
where g is a constant indicating the strength of the coupling, is the projection operator in the OAM basis and is the Pauli spin operator in the y direction on the Bloch sphere (not to be confused with the coordinate space describing the polarization). The measurement pointer is initially in a vertical polarization state
and the system is in an initial state I. The initial systempointer state is modified by a unitary interaction , which can be written using the product Hamiltonian above as
Here we have substituted sinα in place of gt as a coupling constant. This refers to the angle α by which we rotate the polarization of the OAM mode to be measured in our experiment. When α is small, the measurement is weak. In this case, we can express the operator as a Taylor series expansion truncated to first order in sinα. The initial state then evolves to
We can express the strong measurement as a projection into a final state F›:
We can then divide by ‹F I› to get the final pointerpolarization state:
Notice that the weak value appears in the above equation. Using this expression for the final state of the pointer, we can calculate the expectation value of as follows:
Using the substitution =Re+iIm and the initial state s_{i} from equation (9), the above equation can be simplified further:
Similarly, we can calculate the expectation value of as follows:
Thus, we see that the real and imaginary parts of the OAM weak value are proportional to the expectation values of the and Pauli operators (equation (3)):
Additional information
How to cite this article: Malik, M. et al. Direct measurement of a 27dimensional orbitalangularmomentum state vector. Nat. Commun. 5:3115 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4115 (2014).
References
 1.
von Neumann, J. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics Princeton University (1955).
 2.
Wheeler J. A., Zurek W. H. (eds)Quantum Theory and Measurement Princeton University (1983).
 3.
D'Ariano, G. M., Paris, M. G. A. & Sacchi, M. F. Quantum tomography. Adv. Imag. Elect. Phys. 128, 205–308 (2003).
 4.
Lundeen, J. S., Sutherland, B., Patel, A. & Stewart, C. Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction. Nature 474, 188–191 (2011).
 5.
Aharonov, Y., Albert, D. Z. & Vaidman, L. How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351–1354 (1988).
 6.
Dressel, J., Malik, M., Miatto, F. M., Jordan, A. N. & Boyd., R. W. Understanding Quantum Weak Values: Basics and Applications. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.7154 (2013).
 7.
Salvail, J. Z. et al. Full characterization of polarization states of light via direct measurement’. Nat. Photonics 7, 316–321 (2013).
 8.
MolinaTerriza, G., Torres, J. P. & Torner, L. Twisted photons. Nat. Phys. 3, 305–310 (2007).
 9.
Galvez, E., Coyle, L., Johnson, E. & Reschovsky, B. Interferometric measurement of the helical mode of a single photon. New J. Phys. 13, 053017 (2011).
 10.
Yao, A. & Padgett, M. J. Orbital angular momentum: origins, behavior and applications. Adv. Opt. Photon. 3, 161–204 (2011).
 11.
Fickler, R. et al. Quantum entanglement of high angular momenta. Science 338, 640–643 (2012).
 12.
Groblacher, S., Jennewein, T., Vaziri, A., Weihs, G. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental quantum cryptography with qutrits. New J. Phys. 8, 75 (2006).
 13.
Malik, M. et al. Influence of atmospheric turbulence on optical communications using orbital angular momentum for encoding. Opt. Express 20, 13195–13200 (2012).
 14.
Bourennane, M., Karlsson, A., Bjork, G., Gisin, N. & Cerf, N. Quantum key distribution using multilevel encoding: security analysis. J. Phys. AMath. Gen. 35, 10065–10076 (2002).
 15.
Mair, A., Vaziri, A., Weihs, G. & Zeilinger, A. Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons. Nature 412, 313–316 (2001).
 16.
Leach, J. et al. Quantum correlations in optical angleorbital angular momentum variables. Science 329, 662–665 (2010).
 17.
Dada, A. C., Leach, J., Buller, G. S., Padgett, M. J. & Andersson, E. Experimental highdimensional twophoton entanglement and violations of generalized Bell inequalities. Nat. Phys. 7, 677–680 (2011).
 18.
Shankar, R. Principles of Quantum Mechanics Plenum Press (1994).
 19.
Yao, E., FrankeArnold, S., Courtial, J., Barnett, S. & Padgett, M. J. Fourier relationship between angular position and optical orbital angular momentum. Opt. Express 14, 9071–9076 (2006).
 20.
Jack, B., Padgett, M. J. & FrankeArnold, S. Angular diffraction. New J. Phys. 10, 103013 (2008).
 21.
Mirhosseini, M., Malik, M., Shi, Z. & Boyd, R. W. Efficient separation of the orbital angular momentum eigenstates of light. Nat. Commun. 4, 2781 (2013).
 22.
Berkhout, G. C. G., Lavery, M. P. J., Courtial, J., Beijersbergen, M. W. & Padgett, M. J. Efficient sorting of orbital angular momentum states of light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 153601 (2010).
 23.
Lavery, M. P. J. et al. Refractive elements for the measurement of the orbital angular momentum of a single photon. Opt. Express 20, 2110–2115 (2012).
 24.
Prongue, D., Herzig, H. P., Dandliker, R. & Gale, M. T. Optimized kinoform structures for highly efficient fanout elements. Appl. Optics 31, 5706–5711 (1992).
 25.
O'Sullivan, M. N., Mirhosseini, M., Malik, M. & Boyd, R. W. Nearperfect sorting of orbital angular momentum and angular position states of light. Opt. Express 20, 24444–24449 (2012).
 26.
Davis, J., McNamara, D., Cottrell, D. & Sonehara, T. Twodimensional polarization encoding with a phaseonly liquidcrystal spatial light modulator. Appl. Optics 39, 1549–1554 (2000).
 27.
Arrizon, V., Ruiz, U., Carrada, R. & Gonzalez, L. A. Pixelated phase computer holograms for the accurate encoding of scalar complex fields. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 3500–3507 (2007).
 28.
Barnett, S. M. & Pegg, D. T. Quantum theory of rotation angles. Phys. Rev. A 41, 3427–3435 (1990).
 29.
Lundeen, J. S. & Bamber, C. Procedure for direct measurement of general quantum states using weak measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 070402 (2012).
 30.
Dirac, P. On the analogy between classical and quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 195–199 (1945).
 31.
Chaturvedi, S. et al. Wigner–Weyl correspondence in quantum mechanics for continuous and discrete systems—a Diracinspired view. J. Phys. AMath. Gen. 39, 1405–1423 (2006).
 32.
Bamber, C., Sutherland, B., Patel, A., Stewart, C. & Lundeen, J. S. Measurement of the transverse electric field profile of light by a selfreferencing method with direct phase determination. Opt. Express 20, 2034–2044 (2012).
 33.
Thew, R. T., Nemoto, K., White, A. G. & Munro, W. J. Qudit quantumstate tomography. Phys. Rev. A 66, 012303 (2002).
 34.
Agnew, M., Leach, J., McLaren, M., Roux, F. S. & Boyd, R. W. Tomography of the quantum state of photons entangled in high dimensions. Phys. Rev. A 84, 062101 (2011).
 35.
Boyd, R. W. et al. Quantum key distribution in a highdimensional state space: exploiting the transverse degree of freedom of the photon. Proc. SPIE 7948, 79480L–1–79480L–6 (2011).
 36.
Mirhosseini, M. et al. Rapid generation of light beams carrying orbital angular momentum. Opt. Express 21, 30196–30203 (2013).
 37.
Romero, L. A. & Dickey, F. M. Theory of optimal beam splitting by phase gratings. I. Onedimensional gratings. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 2280–2295 (2007).
 38.
Lundeen, J. S. & Resch, K. J. Practical measurement of joint weak values and their connection to the annihilation operator. Phys. Lett. A 334, 337–344 (2005).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the DARPA InPho program, the Canadian Excellence Research Chair (CERC) program, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), the Royal Society and the European Commission through a Marie Curie fellowship. M.Malik would like to thank Dr Justin Dressel for helpful discussions.
Author information
Affiliations
The Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA
 Mehul Malik
 , Mohammad Mirhosseini
 & Robert W. Boyd
Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Boltzmanngasse 3, A1090 Vienna, Austria
 Mehul Malik
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
 Martin P. J. Lavery
 & Miles J. Padgett
School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, HeriotWatt University, Edinburgh, UK
 Jonathan Leach
Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1N 6N5
 Jonathan Leach
 & Robert W. Boyd
Authors
Search for Mehul Malik in:
Search for Mohammad Mirhosseini in:
Search for Martin P. J. Lavery in:
Search for Jonathan Leach in:
Search for Miles J. Padgett in:
Search for Robert W. Boyd in:
Contributions
M.Ma. devised the concept of the experiment. M.Ma. and M.Mi. performed the experiment and analysed data. M.P.J.L. assisted with the experiment. J.L. advised on early aspects of experimental design. R.W.B. and M.J.P. supervised the project. M.Ma. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Mehul Malik.
Rights and permissions
To obtain permission to reuse content from this article visit RightsLink.
About this article
Further reading

1.
Twisted optical communications using orbital angular momentum
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy (2019)

2.
Direct quantum process tomography via measuring sequential weak values of incompatible observables
Nature Communications (2018)

3.
Weak value tomography of strong quantum measurements
Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations (2018)

4.
Projected gradient descent algorithms for quantum state tomography
npj Quantum Information (2017)

5.
Scientific Reports (2017)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.