Abstract
Whisperinggallerymode resonators have been extensively used in conjunction with different materials for the development of a variety of photonic devices. Among the latter, hybrid structures, consisting of dielectric microspheres and colloidal core/shell semiconductor nanocrystals as gain media, have attracted interest for the development of microlasers and studies of cavity quantum electrodynamic effects. Here we demonstrate singleexciton, singlemode, spectrally tuned lasing from ensembles of optical antennadesigned, colloidal core/shell CdSe/CdS quantum rods deposited on silica microspheres. We obtain singleexciton emission by capitalizing on the band structure of the specific core/shell architecture that strongly localizes holes in the core, and the twodimensional quantum confinement of electrons across the elongated shell. This creates a typeII conduction band alignment driven by coulombic repulsion that eliminates nonradiative multiexciton Auger recombination processes, thereby inducing a large exciton–biexciton energy shift. Their ultralow thresholds and singlemode, singleexciton emission make these hybrid lasers appealing for various applications, including quantum information processing.
Introduction
Research in developing lasers based on semiconductor nanocrystals for applications, such as telecommunications, optical interconnects and quantum information processing, has experienced significant growth over the past decade. This activity has resulted in the demonstration of a whole range of sources, including ultrashort (~100 fs) pulse lasers with a few kHz narrow linewidths^{1}, operating with GHzrepetition rates^{2}, and ultralow timing jitter as well as singlephoton sources based on photonic crystals^{3}, micropillars^{4} and nanowires^{5}. Although epitaxial growth techniques that are compatible with complementary metaloxidesemiconductor technology represent an established approach to produce selfassembled nanocrystals for photonic devices, the use of wetchemistry methods has emerged in recent years as a simpler and costeffective fabrication alternative. Attractive features of chemically synthesized nanocrystals include the ease of control over their size, shape, compositional and surface chemical properties, and the wealth of possibilities for their incorporation into micro and nanocavities, photonic crystals, feedback schemes and material matrices.
Among the different types of colloidal nanocrystals, core/shell heterostructures, consisting of a quantum dot (core) embedded in a nanoshell, predominantly with spherical and, more recently, with linear^{6} branched^{7} and platelet^{8,9} geometries, have been under vigorous research investigation for the development of microlasers^{10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19}, fundamental studies of light–matter interactions and solidstate cavity quantum electrodynamic effects^{20,21}, where the end goal is to realize functions, such as entanglement of distinguishable quantum systems and controlled coherent coupling. The potential of these nanostructures in lasing applications with respect to bare quantum dots relies on their ability to reduce surface/interface defects and suppress nonradiative Auger recombination effects, as it has been demonstrated using different approaches, involving the use of shells with large thickness or gradual composition, or engineering of the carrier wavefunctions in the volume of the nanostructure^{22,23,24,25}. This provides prospects for realization of lasing in the singleexciton regime, involving the recombination of a single electron–hole pair (exciton). Optical gain in bare quantum dots instead relies on multiexciton states and experiences a fast decay resulting from nonradiative Auger recombination triggered by quantumconfinementenhanced Coulombic carrier–carrier interactions^{26,27}. Furthermore, in core/shell nanocrystals the encapsulating shell protects the core from photodegradation, thereby ensuring significantly higher photoluminescence (PL) quantum yields^{28,29}.
An effective approach to circumvent the detrimental Auger recombination effect and obtain singleexciton emission has been recently demonstrated in a vertical cavity surface emitting lasing configuration using core/shell, dot/dot CdSe/Zn_{0.5}Cd_{0.5}S nanocrystals with typeI conduction band (CB) alignment^{18} as a gain medium. The alloyed shell in these structures ensured a smooth profile for the confinement (interfacial core/shell) potential, which has been associated with lower Auger recombination rates, resulting from the attenuation of highfrequency components in the groundstate hole wavefunction^{30,31}. The supressed Auger rates allowed for low lasing thresholds for an ensemble averaged number of excitons of ›N‹ <1 (ref. 18).
Here we demonstrate for the first time singlemode, singleexciton, tunable laser emission from an ensemble of colloidal typeII CdSe/CdS core/shell nanorods on a silica microsphere. Core/shell nanocrystals with typeII bandgap alignment at the core/shell interface have been extensively studied over recent years, as they represent another promising route for realizing singleexciton lasers^{32,33,34}. The CBs of the CdSe core and the CdS shell in our nanorods are engineered such that the lowest energy states for holes and electrons reside in the core and shell, respectively. The Coulombic repulsive forces that developed along the length of the shell upon optical excitation result in the development of electric field within their volume, which induces a Stark shift of the absorption wavelength with respect to the emission one and allows for singleexciton lasing. One advantage of the dot (core)/rod (shell) architecture adopted here, which represents the simplest extension to the basic spherical core/shell geometry^{6}, is that it provides additional options for shape engineering and, in turn, for manipulation of the carriers’ wavefunction distributions, and the optical and electronic properties of the nanocrystals^{35,36,37,38}. Furthermore, nanocrystals with elongated geometries exhibit higher absorption coefficients compared with their spherical counterparts, which allows them to act in a way as antennas for optical excitation^{7}.
Results
Hybrid lasers with whisperinggallerymode microresonators
The colloidal CdSe/CdS nanorods were synthesized by the seededgrowth approach^{29}. They could produce PL quantum yields as high as 65%^{29}, and had an effective refractive index of n_{nc}=2.5 at λ=610 nm, a wavelength that corresponds to their ensemble PL peak. Their structure was asymmetric, consisting of a spherical, optically active CdSe core with a diameter of 4.0±0.7 nm embedded in one end of the elongated (28±2 nm) CdS shell. Because of its large absorption crosssection, the latter acts as a sensitizer by efficiently absorbing pump light and conferring the photoexcitation to the CdSe core. As the valence band (VB) offset between the two materials is 0.78 eV^{39}, holes experience a threedimensional confinement within the core. On the other hand, the offset of their CBs depends on the aspect ratio of the nanorods and their growth conditions, ranging from −0.3 to 0.3 eV (refs 39, 40, 41).
The microspheres were produced by CO_{2} laser thermal processing of fibre tapers (see Methods) to which they remained attached after the completion of the fabrication process. They had diameters from 8 to 40 μm, measured Qfactors in excess of 10^{8} and were coated with a thin layer of nanorods by immersion in a toluene solution of the latter. The density of the nanorods attached on the microsphere surface was controlled by varying their concentration in the solution, the immersion time and the withdrawal speed of the microspheres from the solution.
A schematic of the experimental setup and an image of a typical microsphere used in our work are shown in Figs 1 and 2a, respectively. The spheres were pumped at wavelengths ~400 nm with a tuneable frequencydoubled Ti:sapphire amplifier, operating at 250 KHz and emitting 180fsshort pulses with a linewidth of 5 nm. The pump light was evanescently coupled to the microsphere resonators using tapered optical fibres with adiabatic transitions, drawn from singlemode fibres at 405 nm (see Methods). This method ensures efficient incoupling and outcoupling of the pump and laser beam, respectively, as well as selectivity in the excitation of the modes^{42,43}.
To measure their optical power and record their spectra, the laser signals were collected by the same taper used for pumping. In cases when the laser output characteristics of the hybrid source were studied, a probe fibre tip^{44} (Fig. 2b) with a diameter of ~50 nm, a size that ensured sufficient resolution was employed for insitu monitoring of the laser spectra (see Methods for fabrication details). To enhance pump efficiency and prevent excitation of whisperinggallery modes (WGMs) with high radial index, n, phasematching of the propagation coefficients between the propagating fundamental mode in the taper and a fundamental WGM in the microsphere (that is, matching of the spatial period of the optical waves in both the taper and microsphere resonator, and hence constructive interference) was established by suitably choosing the size of taper diameter (typically from 1 to 2 μm) with respect to that of the sphere^{42}. Establishing phase matching of the fundamental taper mode to a given WGM also improved the coupling ‘ideality’ defined as the ratio of power coupled to a desired mode divided by the power coupled or lost to all modes^{43}. Because of the large absorption by the nanorods at the pump wavelength and, hence, the large roundtrip loss in the microsphere resonator, any mode other than the fundamental that may have been excited by the fraction the pump power that was not transferred to fundamental WGMs would be eliminated.
Figure 3a shows the laser spectrum for the single WGM operation at 628.32 nm of a microsphere with a diameter of 9.2 μm, along with the inhomogeneously broadened fluorescence spectrum from an ensemble of nanocrystals and the PL emission spectrum from the hybrid microsphere. The latter exhibits a modulation by a number of peaks with the characteristic WGM distribution. The laser spectrum was obtained by resonantly pumping a fundamental WG pump mode with , with m and l being the azimuthal and polar numbers, respectively, above an absorbed pump power of 100 μW. Such modes, with low n numbers, have very small volumes and are confined to the equatorial ring of the sphere (defined as the area parallel to the taper fibre axis perpendicular to the stem) close to its surface^{45}. They were identified by a dip observed in the transmission through the taper when the pumping wavelength was tuned. The laser line corresponds to the singleexciton transition and its fullwidth at halfmaximum (FWHM) value of Δλ=0.06 nm suggests a Qfactor value of λ/Δλ~10^{4} for the hybrid cavity. This lower value, with respect to the uncoated sphere, is attributed to the surface roughness introduced by the gain medium and the associated scattering loss at the boundaries with the silica microsphere and the surrounding air. Losses from the presence of the fibre may also have contributed to the deterioration of the Qfactor, as experiments were conducted near the overcoupled regime. Parameters that are crucial for achieving singlemode laser emission from the hybrid microsphere are the bandwidth of the pump pulse at ~400 nm, the microsphere size, and the establishment of phasematching pumping conditions. Microspheres with sufficiently small size have a freespectral range (FSR) that is comparable to or larger than the bandwidth of the pulse, which allows for spatially selective excitation of a single mode. Phase matching of this mode with the pump taper mode ensures maximum optical pump power transfer. In this case, the optical power transferred to other nonphasematched modes is significantly smaller and insufficient to produce lasing because of large absorption of the pump wavelength by the microsphere and the associated high losses in the resonator.
Figure 3b shows the laser output characteristics as a function of absorbed pump power for the single WGM operation of the microsphere, indicating a lasing threshold of 67.5 μW and a maximum output power of 5.5 μW for 155 μW of absorbed power, which corresponds to a slope efficiency of η=6.4%. The evolution of the emission line for different absorbed pump powers around the lasing threshold of the hybrid source is displayed in Fig. 3c, exhibiting a progressive spectral narrowing of the linewidth with increasing pump power from ~1.3 nm (FWHM) just below threshold at 66 μW, to 0.06 nm at absorbed pump powers near and in excess of 119 μW. Furthermore, a significant increase in the emission peak intensity above threshold can be observed, which follows a linear behaviour as shown in Fig. 3b.
Microspheres with larger diameters produced a multimode laser emission due to the smaller FSR, Δλ_{FSR}, in between the modes with adjacent l indices. Figure 3d shows a laseremission spectrum obtained from a microsphere with a diameter of 29.4 μm by pumping at the equatorial zone. The lasing modes in the spectrum appear at wavelengths separated by a distance of 2.4 nm, which is very close to the value of Δλ_{FSR}=2.375 of the hybrid microsphere derived from the equation^{46}
where λ_{L}=628.32 nm is the emission wavelength of the first mode, n_{s}=1.47 is the refractive index of the silica microsphere, whereas R_{H}=14.7 μm is the radius of the hybrid sphere, which was assumed to be equal to that of the silica template.
Laser emission by singleexciton and biexciton transitions
The modality of the laser emission can also be tuned by varying the coupling conditions and the optical pump power. Hence, evanescent coupling of the pump beam into the resonator away from its equatorial zone results in a multimode laser emission as shown in Fig. 4a, where, apart from the laser line at 628.32 nm, a second laser line emerges at lower wavelengths near 592.6 nm. Nonequatorial pumping effectively invalidates the aforementioned conditions for single modality, as it leads to the excitation of a number of modes with different radial and azimuthal numbers, thereby inducing multimode lasing. This multimode behaviour becomes evident by moving the tapered fibre by a distance of approximately half the width of the tapered fibre (that is of the order of 0.5 μm) away from the equator. Figure 4b shows the output characteristics of the two laser lines, revealing pump power thresholds of 68.5 and 123.3 μW for the lowenergy and highenergy transitions, respectively. The data points were obtained by using suitable wavelength cutoff filters to isolate the laser emission of each transition. The dependency of the optical power of the two lines on absorbed pump power in the prelasing (linear) regime is displayed in a log–log plot in Fig. 4c. The slope efficiencies of η≈1 and 2 derived suggest a linear and a quadratic dependence for the transitions in the low and high energy spectral area, which are typical of single and biexcitonic gain mechanisms, respectively. Furthermore, the threshold of the laser emission at 592.6 nm is approximately twice as high as that at 628.32 nm, thereby providing an additional proof of their biexcitonic and singleexcitonic nature of the corresponding transition, respectively.
As an additional verification of the assignment of the laser lines in Fig. 4a to the singleexciton and biexciton CdSe transitions, we calculated their energies. To this end, we derived the wavefunctions ψ_{e} (electron) and ψ_{h} (hole) from the Schrödinger equations by using an iterative process involving the effective mass approximation method, and taking into account the Coulomb interaction (see Methods). Effective mass approximation has emerged over the years as a reliable approach for reproducing the energy spectra of confined excitons in semiconducting nanocrystals, by successfully addressing the problem of choosing the actual electrical potential felt by each carrier in the corresponding Schrödinger equations^{47,48}. In this process, we first sequentially varied the CB offset and the nanorod diameter following the Hartree selfconsistent potential approach^{49} so as to match the singleexciton emission wavelength with that of the experimental line at 628.32 nm. In this process, the nanorod length was maintained fixed at a value of 28 nm, as this parameter has insignificant impact on the confinement effect within the limits of the deviation (±2 nm) from this value associated with the nanocrystal synthesis process. As a result, we obtained very good agreement by assuming an offset value of −0.09 eV and a diameter of 4.34 nm; the energy eigenvalues derived for the electron and the hole with respect to the bottom of the conduction and VBs of CdSe were 0.14876, eV and 0.14349, eV, respectively, thereby suggesting singleexciton lasing at 628.6 nm. Figure 5a displays a schematic of the nanorod along with a band alignment diagram at the heterointerface between its core and shell, indicating the values adopted for the core diameter and the CB offset in our calculations. The calculated wavefunctions are displayed in Fig. 5b, showing spatial separation between the hole and the electron charge densities with the holes remaining confined to the CdSe core and the electrons being delocalized in one dimension over the entire nanostructure. Such carrier distributions are typical of typeII core/shell nanocrystals, and result in very small overlaps ^{2} of their wavefunctions. Next, we calculated the wavefunction distributions and emission wavelength for the biexciton, by adopting the same values for the offset and the nanorod size used for our calculations in the singleexciton regime. Figure 5c shows the calculated wavefunctions, wherein one exciton there is a zero charge density, whereas in the other samesign charges are spatially well separated. The calculated energy eigenvalues for the pairs of electrons and holes are (0.15162 and 0.15363, eV) and (0.19835 and 0.19835, eV), respectively. These values, which are unique within the size limits of the nanocrystals used in our experiment yield biexciton laser emission at 593.3 nm, which is very close to the spectral line observed at 592.6 nm.
To evaluate the potential of the gain medium to produce optical gain by singleexciton states without any involvement of multiexcitons, we have derived the gain threshold ›N_{th}‹ expressed in terms of the average number of excitons per nanocrystal^{33}:
where Δ_{xx}=119 meV represents the spacing between the single and biexciton line at 626.32 nm and at 592.6 nm, respectively, and Γ is the emission linewidth of a single nanocrystal at room temperature.
For the latter, we have adopted an upper value of Γ=65 meV, which was recorded for the emission of a single CdSe/CdS core/shell tetrapodshaped nanocrystal with an armlength of 30 nm^{50} at room temperature. From equation (2), we obtain a value of ›N_{th}‹=0.675, which is well below the theoretical value of ›N_{th}‹=1 for biexciton gain in homogeneously broadened typeI nanocrystals and very near to that of ideal typeII nanocrystals (›N‹=2/3)^{33}. The latter are associated with considerably larger Δ_{xx} values with respect to the transition linewidth, thereby allowing for the elimination of absorption losses and, hence, for optical gain from singleexciton states.
Wavelengthtuneable laser emission
Tuning the emission from spherical microcavities has been realized either by modulating the pump power, thereby exploiting the thermooptical effect of the active material^{51}, or by using external heating sources^{52}, or with the application of pressure or strain^{53}. Although the tuning ranges achieved with the strain method can even approach the frequency separation between adjacent resonance peaks of the WGMs^{53}, thereby exceeding those obtained by temperature variation, the latter has the attraction of enhanced accuracy of control over the emission wavelength. In this work, the lasing wavelength, λ_{L}, was tuned by heating the 9.2μm large hybrid microsphere with 3.5μm pulses of 200 fs duration and 80 MHz repetition rate from a tunable femtosecond laser, which were directed onto the microsphere by a microscope objective. The optical power of the infrared laser beam was raised in successive steps, and for each step the wavelength of the pump laser was modulated so as to excite resonant WGMs that were gradually shifted in wavelength due to the temperature elevation. Throughout these experiments, the evanescently coupled power was maintained constant at 100 μW. The laser spectrum was recorded for each pump power setting, indicating a maximum wavelength red shift of 2.1 nm within the available power range of 60 mW (Fig. 6a), which corresponds to ~30% of the FSR at λ_{L}.
As at λ=3.5 μm the nanorods are transparent, the observed shift is expected to result from a temperatureinduced increase in the size of the absorbing silica microsphere; other contributions originate from changes of the thermooptic coefficient (dn_{nc}/dT=1 × 10^{−4} K^{−1}), bandgap energy (ΔE_{g}) and the nanorods size due to a temperature rise induced by heat conduction from the microsphere. The effect of these factors on the tuning range of the lasing wavelength Δλ_{L} can be described by:
where ΔT is the temperature rise in the hybrid microsphere, α_{s}=5.5 × 10^{−7} K^{−1} and α_{nc}=4.5 × 10^{−6} K^{−1} are the thermal expansion coefficients of silica and the nanorods, respectively, and Δλ_{bg} represents the wavelength shift resulting from ΔE_{g}. For α_{nc} and dn_{nc}/dT, we adopted the values of the bulk CdS crystal.
To investigate the consistency of the experimentally obtained tuning range, we estimated ΔT and Δλ_{bg}, and subsequently calculated Δλ_{L} from equation (3). To derive an analytical expression for ΔT, we assumed that the impact of the thin nanorod layer on the temperature of the laserheated silica sphere is negligible, meaning that they both have effectively the same temperature (see Methods). The microcavity can be therefore considered as a solid consisting of a single material (silica), which is heated by a focused laser beam in the surrounding air. As the latter is transparent at the illumination wavelength, it is expected to reduce the temperature of the hybrid microsphere. Following an approach used to address a similar problem^{54} based on solving the heat equation, we derived by adopting appropriate boundary conditions (see Methods) for ΔT the expression:
where κ_{α}=2.6 × 10^{−2} mW m^{−1} K^{−1} and κ_{s}=1.38 × 10^{−3} mW m^{−1} K^{−1} are the thermal conductivities of the air and silica, respectively, P_{o} is the illumination laser power and is the heat transferred from the sphere to the air. The term P_{abs}=0.65 represents the optical power fraction absorbed by the silica, with R_{fr} being the Fresnel reflection at the air/nanorods and nanorods/silica interfaces given by:
with n_{α}=1 being the refractive index of the air. In calculating ΔT in equation (4), one has to consider that due to the Gaussian beam profile and the spherical shape of the microcavity, parts of the beam impinging on the sphere at angles that deviate considerably from the normal experience high reflections and, therefore, have a negligible contribution to ΔT. As a satisfactory approximation, we assumed that only the optical power included within the FWHM of the beam, that is 50% of the total power, contributes effectively to the temperature elevation. To account for this effect, we introduced the term P_{g}=0.5 in equation (4), which then yields for the maximum available infraredlaser power of 60 mW a value of ΔT=32.7 K. Returning to equation (3), we calculated Δλ_{bg} from the expression
where the wavelength that corresponds to the bandgap energy λ_{bg} is set equal to λ_{L}. For the calculated temperature increase of ΔT=32.7 K, ΔE_{g} can be derived from
with β=216 K, α=1.8 × 10^{−4} eV/K and E_{g}(0)= 2.13 eV being correspondingly the Debye temperature, a temperature constant and the bandgap at 0 K.
Figure 6b shows the calculated effect of each of the four individual parameters and their combined impact on Δλ together with the experimentally obtained wavelength shifts. The latter are smaller than the calculated ones, arguably because of a weaker absorption of the heating beam from the microsphere than that assumed and/or an imperfect alignment of the infraredlaser beam with respect to the microsphere, meaning that in reality the ΔT induced was about 28 K, as it can be derived from equation (4). It is worth noting that for ΔT=32.7 K, the increase in the nanorod size would not exceed 0.01 nm, which precludes any contribution to the laser wavelength shift from a change of the quantum confinement energy.
Discussion
We have demonstrated singlemode laser emission on the singleexciton recombination transition in core/shell nanorods with a typeII band offset. The simplicity of the wetchemical synthesis of the nanorods in combination with the high Qfactors of the spherical silica resonators and the efficiency of the fibrecoupling approach for optical pumping make such hybrid systems excellent candidates for studies of the lasing properties of novel gain media and cavity quantum electrodynamic effects. In addition to the singleexcitonic nature of the laser emission, other laseroperating characteristics, such as its singlemode emission, which is associated with low levels of noise, and the ultralow lasing thresholds that were obtained (thanks to the larger dipole oscillation strength of the antennadesigned nanocrystals), are appealing for quantum information processing. Furthermore, the ability to tune the emission wavelength of these WGM microlasers in the visible spectral range is interesting for applications related to biosensing. Considering the inherent potential of colloidal nanocrystals for hybrid integration onto a wide range of platforms and optical resonators, one could envisage the use of optically or even electrically pumped singleexciton lasers based on specialist nanocrystal designs for integrated photonic, labonachip and optical interconnect applications. Advances in the development of colloidal nanocrystalline gain media like the recent demonstration of nearly temperatureinsensitive threshold for amplified spontaneous emission from CdSe/CdS quantum core/shell (dot/rod) structures^{55} can pave the way for the realization of such miniature integrated sources.
Methods
Fabrication of silica fibreoptical devices
Coupling of pump light to the circumference of microsphere resonators can be realized either with freespace optics or by evanescent wave coupling with the use of channel waveguides in integrated optics configurations, prisms, sidepolished fibre couplers and tapered fibres^{45}. We adopted the latter method for our experiments and used tapers fabricated by the flamebrushing technique^{56}, which involves heating of a section of the fibre with a ‘Ω’shaped resistive microheater operated at a temperature of ~1,400 °C. The microheater was scanned along the fibre section, while at the same time the two fibre ends were pulled in opposite directions by a pair of computercontrolled translation stages of submicron precision. This method can produce taper transitions of welldefined length and shape, and extremely uniform waists, with submicron diameters by controlling the heating and stretching speed. The tapers used had adiabatic transitions to preserve the low propagation loss inherent to the fundamental fibre mode.
The microspheres were produced by thermal processing of a fibre taper (stem) by a CO_{2} laser beam. Tapers enabled fabrication of microspheres with diameters considerably smaller than the fibre outer diameter, and were drawn from standard telecom silica fibres (outer diameter=125 μm) following the process described in the previous paragraph. The uniform waisttapered region formed was cut in its centre and then one of the taper ends was heated by the CO_{2} laser beam to a temperature in excess of 1,000 °C, causing it to reflow and mould into a sphericalshaped structure due to surface tension. Thanks to the high viscosity of the silica glass, the reflowed structure was highly spherical and extremely uniform, with intrinsically very low surface roughness and, hence, very low scattering loss. After the fabrication process had been completed, they remained attached to their stems, which did not affect the optical modes near the equatorial plane that were excited to produce laser emission.
The fibre tips were manufactured using a commercial micropipette puller, in which the heating source was a CO_{2} laser, and the pulling process was controlled by a microprocessor. The device enabled fabrication of tips with tapered transition lengths between 1 and 2 mm, and a diameter as small as 40 nm, from fibres with an outer diameter of 125 μm. The taper angle of the tip was designed to be small enough to adiabatically convert the fundamental mode in the fibre core into a fundamental mode guided by the cladding/air interface allowing for transmissions larger than 98%.
Calculation of laser energies for the singleexciton and biexciton transitions
In the singleexciton case, the carrier wavefunctions were calculated from the Schrödinger equations:
where ħ is the reduced Plank constant, and are the effective masses of the electron and hole, respectively, which are material dependent ( and for the CdSe core, and and ^{57,58} for the CdS shell), q_{e}, E_{e}, q_{h} and E_{h} are the charges and energy eigenvalues of the electrons and the holes, whereas V_{cb} and V_{vb} are the potentials of the CB and VB, respectively. Finally, in equations (8) and (9), φ_{e}, and φ_{h} represent the electric potentials of the electron and hole, respectively, which account for the Coulombic electron–hole interaction and were calculated from the Poisson equations:
here, ρ_{e} and ρ_{h} stand for the electron and hole distributions in the nanorod, respectively, whereas ε and ε_{o} represent the relative permittivity and the vacuum permittivity, respectively, given by:
we note that contributions of the CB and VB to the hole and electron wavefunctions, ψ_{h} and ψ_{e}, respectively, were neglected, as CdSe and CdS are wide bandgap semiconductors. The wavefunctions were solved iteratively using a finite element method with sequential variation of the nanorod diameter and the energy offset of the CBs, as well as optimization of φ_{e}, and φ_{h} following the Hartree selfconsistent potential approach, to match the singleexciton emission line. For the single exciton, we started by setting in the Schrodinger equation (8) the initial potential to zero on the basis of which ψ_{e} was calculated and introduced into the Poisson equation (10). From the latter, the potential generated by the electron was computed and the value derived was introduced into the Schrodinger equation (9) to calculate the ψ_{h}. The resulting wavefunction was in turn introduced into the Poisson equation (11) to obtain the potential generated by the hole. The derived potential was introduced into the Schrodinger equation (8), which was solved to obtain a new expression for ψ_{e}. This procedure was continued until further iterations left unaltered the carriers’ wavefunctions and potentials. In this case, selfconsistency was achieved and the derived values were taken as the actual wavefunctions and potentials, respectively. We stress that although the zero potential chosen to initiate the calculation process may give the impression that the electron–hole interaction was not taken into account, the final carrier potentials were indeed introduced in the calculation through the iteration process followed, providing optimal description of the specific quantum system.
The Schrödinger equations used for the biexciton are essentially similar to those described above, with the only difference being that the electric potentials generated by all the carriers (that is, the two electrons φ_{e1} and φ_{e2}, and the two holes φ_{h1} and φ_{h2}) were considered:
The electric potentials in the above equations were derived by the Poisson equations:
with ρ_{e1}, ρ_{e2} and ρ_{h1}, ρ_{h2} being the electron and hole distributions in the nanorod, respectively, that can be derived from:
To solve the system of equations (14, 15, 16, 17), we followed a similar iteration process with one implemented for the calculation of the singleexciton laser emission. Hence, we assumed zero potentials for the two holes and the second electron to calculate the wavefunction ψ_{e1} from the Schrodinger equation (14). The resulting wavefunction was then introduced in equation (22) to obtain the distribution ρ_{e1}, which was in turn introduced in the corresponding Poisson equation (18) to derive the potential φ_{e1}. This process was repeated for the other carriers and iterated for each of them until the potentials and wavefunctions produced remained unchanged with further iteration. We emphasize that first the core size and CB offset values used in the biexcitonrelated calculations were the ones utilized to reproduce the laser singleexciton laser emission and, second, the calculations yielded a unique value for the biexciton lasing wavelength. The calculations were carried out using the Matlab and Comsol software packages with the latter providing the finite element method to solve the Schrodinger and Poisson equations.
Calculation of the temperature rise in the hybrid microsphere
An analytical expression for the laserinduced temperature of the hybrid microsphere, which also accounts for the reduction caused by the ambient medium (air), was derived for a fixed, Gaussianshaped laser beam that was exclusively absorbed by the solid sphere and not by the ambient medium^{54}. For this purpose, we solved the heat equation:
where D is the thermal diffusivity and I=I_{o}·(1−R)·exp(−r^{2}/w^{2}) is the intensity of the irradiating Gaussian infrared beam with a radius w. The following boundary conditions were applied:
(a) The balance of energy fluxes at the interface R=R_{H}:
(b) The continuity of temperature at the interface R=R_{H}:
with T_{α} and T_{s} being the temperature in the ambient medium and the miscrosphere, respectively.
(c) The temperature rise at infinity shall vanish:
In the following, we demonstrate the validity of our assumption that the impact of the thin layer of nanocrystals on the temperature of the laserheated silica sphere is negligible and that both media have effectively the same temperature. For this purpose, we consider the heat transported from the sphere given by:
where, h=4 nm is the coating thickness and κ_{s}=1.38 × 10^{−3} mW m^{−1} K^{−1} is the thermal conductivity of silica. The infrared laser beam radius can be approximated as being equal to the microsphere radius, w=R_{H}=4.6 μm. From equation (30), it can be then derived that the relative change in the surface temperature caused by the nanorod coating is:
where κ_{n}=2 × 10^{−2} mW m^{−1} K^{−1} is the thermal conductivity of the nanorods, for which we assumed to be equal to the corresponding value of the bulk CdS crystal. As κ_{n} is an order of magnitude higher than κ_{s}, it becomes clear that the reduction of the temperature of the microsphere due to the heat transport to the nanocrystal layer is insignificant.
Finally, with regard to the term in equation (4), which represents the heat transported from the sphere to the air, the ratio κ_{α}/κ_{s} was derived by considering that the heat originating from the hybrid sphere is shared with the air, implying that the fluxes from the sphere (J_{s}) and the air (J_{a}) should satisfy the equation:
where I is the intensity of the infrared light.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Grivas, C. et al. Singlemode tunable laser emission in the singleexciton regime from colloidal nanocrystals. Nat. Commun. 4:2376 doi: 10.1038/ncomms3376 (2013).
References
 1.
Lelarge, F. et al. Recent advances on InAs/InP quantum dash based semiconductor lasers & optical amplifiers operating at 1.55 μm. J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. 13, 111–124 (2007).
 2.
Merghem, K. et al. Pulse generation at 346 GHz using a passively mode locked quantumdashbased laser at 1.55 μm. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 021107 (2009).
 3.
Aoki, K. et al. Coupling of quantumdot light emission with a threedimensional photonic crystal nanocavity. Nat. Photon 2, 688–692 (2008).
 4.
Strauf, S. et al. Highfrequency singlephoton source with polarization control. Nat. Photon 1, 704–708 (2007).
 5.
Claudon, J. et al. A highly efficient singlephoton source based on a quantum dot in a photonic nanowire. Nat. Photon 4, 174–177 (2010).
 6.
Krahne, R. et al. Physical properties of elongated inorganic nanoparticles. Phys. Rep. 501, 75–221 (2011).
 7.
Talapin, D. V. et al. Seeded growth of highly luminescent CdSe/CdS nanoheterostructures with rod and tetrapod morphologies. Nano Lett. 7, 2951–2959 (2007).
 8.
Ithurria, S. & Talapin, D. V. Colloidal Atomic Layer Deposition (cALD) using selflimiting reactions at nanocrystal surface coupled to phase transfer between polar and nonpolar media. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 18585–18590 (2012).
 9.
Cassette, E. et al. Colloidal CdSe/CdS dotinplate nanocrystals with 2Dpolarized emission. ACS Nano 6, 6741–6750 (2012).
 10.
Schaefer, J. et al. Quantum dot microdrop laser. Nano Lett. 8, 1709–1712 (2008).
 11.
Chan, Y. et al. Blue semiconductor nanocrystal laser. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 073102 (2005).
 12.
Min, B. et al. Ultralow threshold onchip microcavity nanocrystal quantum dot CdSe/ZnS laser. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 191124 (2006).
 13.
Eisler, H.J. et al. Colorselective semiconductor nanocrystal laser. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 4614–4616 (2002).
 14.
Snee, P. T., Chan, Y. H., Nocera, D. G. & Bawendi, M. G. Whisperinggallerymode lasing from a semiconductor nanocrystal/microsphere resonator composite. Adv. Mater. 17, 1131–1136 (2005).
 15.
Zhang, C. et al. Twophotonpumped lasing from colloidal nanocrystal quantum dots. Opt. Lett. 33, 2437–2439 (2008).
 16.
Malko, A. V. et al. From amplified spontaneous emission to microring lasing using nanocrystal quantum dot solids. Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 1303–1305 (2002).
 17.
Xu, J. & Xiao, M. Lasing action in colloidal CdS/CdSe/CdS quantum wells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 173117 (2005).
 18.
Dang, C. et al. Red, green and blue lasing enabled by singleexciton gain in colloidal quantum dot films. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 335–339 (2012).
 19.
ZavelaniRossi, M., Lupo, M. G., Krahne, R., Manna, L. & Lanzani, G. Lasing in selfassembled microcavities of CdSe/CdS core/shell colloidal quantum rods. Nanoscale 2, 931–935 (2010).
 20.
Artemyev, M. V., Woggon, U., Wannemacher, R., Jaschinski, H. & Langbein, W. Light trapped in a photonic dot: microspheres act as a cavity for quantum dot emission. Nano Lett. 1, 309–314 (2001).
 21.
Le Thomas, N. et al. Cavity QED with Semiconductor Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 6, 557–561 (2006).
 22.
GarcíaSantamaría, F. et al. Suppressed auger recombination in “giant” nanocrystals boosts optical gain performance. Nano Lett. 9, 3482–3488 (2009).
 23.
Mahler, B. et al. Towards nonblinking colloidal quantum dots. Nat. Mater. 7, 659–664 (2008).
 24.
Wang, X. Y. et al. Nonblinking semiconductor nanocrystals. Nature 459, 686–689 (2009).
 25.
ZavelaniRossi, M., Lupo, M. G., Tassone, F., Manna, L. & Lanzani, G. Suppression of biexciton auger recombination in CdSe/CdS dot/rods: role of the electronic structure in the carrier dynamics. Nano Lett. 10, 3142–3150 (2010).
 26.
Klimov, V. I. et al. Optical gain and stimulated emission in nanocrystal quantum dots. Science 290, 314–317 (2000).
 27.
Klimov, V. I., Mikhailovsky, A. A., McBranch, D. W., Leatherdale, C. A. & Bawendi, M. G. Quantization of multiparticle auger rates in semiconductor quantum dots. Science 287, 1011–1013 (2000).
 28.
Talapin, D. V. et al. Highly emissive colloidal CdSe/CdS heterostructures of mixed dimensionality. Nano Lett. 3, 1677–1681 (2003).
 29.
Carbone, L. et al. Synthesis & micrometerscale assembly of colloidal CdSe/CdS nanorods prepared by a seeded growth approach. Nano Lett. 7, 2942–2950 (2007).
 30.
Cragg, G. E. & Efros, A. L. Suppression of auger processes in confined structures. Nano Lett. 10, 313–317 (2010).
 31.
GarcíaSantamaría, F. et al. Breakdown of volume scaling in auger recombination in CdSe/CdS heteronanocrystals: the role of the coreshell interface. Nano Lett. 11, 687–693 (2011).
 32.
Ivanov, S. A. et al. Light amplification using inverted core/shell nanocrystals: towards lasing in the singleexciton regime. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 10625–10630 (2004).
 33.
Klimov, V. I. et al. Singleexciton optical gain in semiconductor nanocrystals. Nature 447, 441–446 (2007).
 34.
Nanda, J. et al. Light amplification in the singleexciton regime using excitonexciton repulsion in typeII nanocrystal quantum Dots. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 15382–15390 (2007).
 35.
Saba, M. et al. Exciton–exciton interaction and optical gain in colloidal CdSe/CdS dot/rod nanocrystals. Adv. Mater. 21, 4942–4946 (2009).
 36.
Sitt, A., Della Sala, F., Menagen, G. & Banin, U. Multiexciton engineering in seeded core/shell nanorods: transfer from typeI to quasitypeII regimes. Nano Lett. 9, 3470–3476 (2009).
 37.
Müller, J. et al. Wave function engineering in elongated semiconductor nanocrystals with heterogeneous carrier confinement. Nano Lett. 5, 2044–2049 (2005).
 38.
Borys, N. J., Walter, M. J., Huang, J., Talapin, D. V. & Lupton, J. M. The role of particle morphology in interfacial energy transfer in CdSe/CdS heterostructure nanocrystals. Science 330, 1371–1374 (2010).
 39.
Nethercot, A. H. Prediction of Fermi energies and photoelectric thresholds based on electronegativity effects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1088–1091 (1974).
 40.
TragerCowan, C., Parbrook, P. J., Henderson, B. & O’Donnell, K. P. Band alignments in Zn(Cd)S(Se) strained layer superlattices. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 7, 536–541 (1992).
 41.
O’Donnell, K. P. et al. The optical properties of wide bandgap binary II–VI superlattices. J. Cryst. Growth 117, 497–500 (1992).
 42.
Knight, J. C., Cheung, G., Jacques, F. & Birks, T. A. Phasematched excitation of whisperinggallerymode resonances by a fiber taper. Opt. Lett. 22, 1129–1131 (1997).
 43.
Spillane, S. M., Kippenberg, T. J., Painter, O. J. & Vahala, K. J. Ideality in a fibertapercoupled microresonator system for application to cavity quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 043902 (2003).
 44.
Knight, J. C. et al. Mapping whisperinggallery modes in microspheres with a nearfield probe. Opt. Lett. 20, 1515–1518 (1995).
 45.
Ward, J. & Benson, O. WGM microresonators: sensing, lasing and fundamental optics with microspheres. Laser Photonics Rev. 5, 553–570 (2011).
 46.
Kamada, K., Sasaki, K., Misawa, H., Kitamura, N. & Masuhara, H. Picosecond lasing dynamics of a single dyedoped microparticle in solution. Chem. Phys. Lett. 210, 89–93 (1993).
 47.
Efros, Al. L & Rosen, M. The electronic structure of semiconductor nanocrystals. Annu. Mater. Sci. 30, 475–521 (2000).
 48.
Norris, D. J. inSemiconductor and Metal Nanocrystals ed. Klimov V. I. Marcel Dekker Inc. (2004).
 49.
Janssens, K. L, Partoens, B. & Peeters, F. M. Magnetoexcitons in planar typeII quantum dots in perpendicular magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 64, 155324 (2001).
 50.
Choi, C. L. et al. Spatially indirect emission in a luminescent nanocrystal molecule. Nano Lett. 11, 2358–2362 (2011).
 51.
Ward, J. M. & Chormaic, S. N. Thermooptical tuning of whispering gallery modes in Er:Yb codoped phosphate glass microspheres. Appl. Phys. B 100, 847–850 (2010).
 52.
Chiba, A., Fujiwara, H., Hotta, J., Takeuchi, S. & Sasaki, K. Resonant frequency control of a microspherical cavity by temperature adjustment. Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 43, 6138–6141 (2004).
 53.
von Klitzing, W., Long, R., Ilchenko, V. S., Hare, J. & LefèvreSeguin, V. Frequency tuning of the whisperinggallery modes of silica microspheres for cavity quantum electrodynamics and spectroscopy. Opt. Lett. 26, 166–168 (2001).
 54.
Bauerle, D. Laser Processing & Chemistry SpringerVerlag (2000).
 55.
Moreels, I. et al. Nearly temperatureindependent threshold for amplified spontaneous emission in colloidal CdSe/CdS quantum dotinrods. Adv. Mater. 24, OP231–OP235 (2012).
 56.
Jung, Y. M., Brambilla, G. & Richardson, D. J. Broadband singlemode operation of standard optical fibers by using a subwavelength optical wire filter. Opt. Express 16, 14661–14667 (2008).
 57.
Mews, A., Eychmüller, A., Giersig, M., Schooss, D. & Weller, H. Preparation, characterization, and photophysics of the quantumdot quantumwell system CdS/HgS/CdS. J. Phys. Chem. 98, 934–941 (1994).
 58.
Haus, J. W., Zhou, H. S., Honma, I. & Komiyama, H. Quantum confinement in semiconductor heterostructure nanometersize particles. Phys. Rev. B 47, 1359–1365 (1993).
Acknowledgements
P.W. is funded by the Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology, cofunded by the MarieCurie Actions under FP7. G.B. acknowledges the Royal Society (London) for his university research fellowship. P.L. acknowledges support from the FP7 ITNICARUS and the Network of Excellence N4E. L.M. acknowledges support from the FP7 ERC starting grant NANOARCH (contract number 240111). We thank Marco Zanella and Iwan Moreels for their help with the synthesis of the nanocrystals and many helpful discussions, respectively.
Author information
Affiliations
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
 Christos Grivas
 , Chunyong Li
 , Peristera Andreakou
 & Pavlos Lagoudakis
Optoelectronics Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
 Pengfei Wang
 , Ming Ding
 & Gilberto Brambilla
Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, via Morego 30, I16163 Genoa, Italy
 Liberato Manna
Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5046, Delft 2600, The Netherlands
 Liberato Manna
Authors
Search for Christos Grivas in:
Search for Chunyong Li in:
Search for Peristera Andreakou in:
Search for Pengfei Wang in:
Search for Ming Ding in:
Search for Gilberto Brambilla in:
Search for Liberato Manna in:
Search for Pavlos Lagoudakis in:
Contributions
C.G. carried out the experiments, contributed to the calculations and wrote the manuscript. C.L. contributed to the calculations. P.A. contributed to the experiments. P.W., M.D. and G.B. designed and fabricated the silica fibre optic devices (tapers, tips and microsphere templates). L.M. designed and fabricated the CdSe/CdS core/shell nanocrystals. P.L. contributed to the calculations. C.G. and P.L. coordinated the research. All authors commented on the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Christos Grivas.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercialShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/byncsa/3.0/
To obtain permission to reuse content from this article visit RightsLink.
About this article
Further reading

A room temperature continuouswave nanolaser using colloidal quantum wells
Nature Communications (2017)

Plasmon enhancement for Vernier coupled singlemode lasing from ZnO/Pt hybrid microcavities
Nano Research (2017)

Reconfigurable Liquid Whispering Gallery Mode Microlasers
Scientific Reports (2016)

IIInitride tunable cupcavities supporting quasi whispering gallery modes from ultraviolet to infrared
Scientific Reports (2016)

A twodimensional π–d conjugated coordination polymer with extremely high electrical conductivity and ambipolar transport behaviour
Nature Communications (2015)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.