Abstract
By acquiring wings, bats are the only mammalian lineage to have achieved flight. To be capable of powered flight, they have unique muscles associated with their wing. However, the developmental origins of bat wing muscles, and the underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms are unknown. Here we report, first, that the wing muscles are derived from multiple myogenic sources with different embryonic origins, and second, that there is a spatiotemporal correlation between the outgrowth of wing membranes and the expansion of wing muscles into them. Together, these findings imply that the wing membrane itself may regulate the patterning of wing muscles. Last, through comparative gene expression analysis, we show Fgf10 signalling is uniquely activated in the primordia of wing membranes. Our results demonstrate how components of Fgf signalling are likely to be involved in the development and evolution of novel complex adaptive traits.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Bats (order Chiroptera) acquired wings to become the only mammalian lineage with the ability of powered flight. They have adapted to various environments through tremendous variation on a basic single body plan and now constitute over 20% of extant mammalian species1,2. Recent molecular phylogenetic analysis supports the monophyly of bats, suggesting a single origin of powered flight in mammals3. It is almost universally accepted that bats evolved from small arboreal mammals2,4. However, to date there are no mammalian fossils of intermediate morphology linking bats to gliding or flightless ancestors5, implying the sudden appearance of this mammalian lineage with a unique body plan. The earliest known fossil bat, Onychonycteris finneyi, from the early Eocene was clearly capable of powered flight, possessing a forelimb that was morphologically similar to that of extant bats6. This has led some authors to hypothesize that bats achieved powered flight in a relatively short period of geological time, possibly through small changes in gene regulation during organogenesis7,8. However, the fossil record of bats is currently quite poor9, so there is still a possibility that transitional fossils may be discovered in the future. In that case, the evolution of the unique body plan of bats might be better explained by means of gradual processes, such as the divergence of many regulatory elements for several developmental control genes10. In any case, molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the evolution of the bat wing remain poorly understood.
In this paper we focused on the wing muscles—a synapomorphic character supporting the monophyly of bats11,12. Bats have an architecturally unique muscle complex called the occipito-pollicalis that extends along the anterior wing membrane (propatagium) and is necessary for powered flight (Fig. 1a)13. In addition, they possess sheets of muscles composed of the coraco-cutaneus, the humeropatagialis and the plagiopatagialis within the lateral wing membrane (plagiopatagium), and the uropatagialis within the interfemoral wing membrane (uropatagium) (Fig. 1a). These muscles are considered to have essential roles in controlling the shape of the wing and allowing the bats to fly14. Through detailed description of the ontogeny of wing muscles and their associated tissues in bat embryos, we have revealed that bat wing muscles are derived from multiple myogenic sources with different embryonic origins, and there is a spatiotemporal correlation between the outgrowth of wing membranes and the expansion of wing muscles into them. Furthermore, through comparative gene expression analysis, we found Fgf10 signalling is uniquely activated in the primordia of wing membranes and connective tissues within the membranes that may affect the architectural patterning of bat wing muscles.
Results
Development of bat wing muscles
As an initial step to understand the developmental origin of bat wing muscles, we described their ontogeny. The occipito-pollicalis forms from two spatially separated precursors: the proximal and distal elements. The former was first detected as a small muscle mass posterior to the muscle of the pinna (auricularis) and dorsal to the sternomastoid in bat embryos at stage 15 (Fig. 1g). The muscle expanded longitudinally at stage 16 (Fig. 1m). The latter was first recognized as a slender muscle mass within the already expanded propatagium at stage 17 (Supplementary Fig. S1). The coraco-cutaneus, humeropatagialis and plagiopatagialis muscles were first recognized within the primordium of the plagiopatagium at stage 15 (Fig. 1i), and the muscular layer had further expanded in the tissue of the plagiopatagium at stage 16 (Fig. 1o). The uropatagialis first appeared as a sheet of muscle within the tissue between the tail and proximal part of the hind limb at stage 16 (Supplementary Fig. S2).
Innervation pattern and origin of bat wing muscles
To identify the developmental origin and the homology of these muscles, we examined the innervation pattern, which has been used as a criterion for establishing muscle homology because of its close link to myogenesis15. Our analysis revealed that both proximal and distal elements of the occipito-pollicalis were solely innervated by cranial nerve VII (the facial nerve), as well as the auricularis and the platysma (Fig. 2a; Supplementary Fig. S1; Supplementary Movies). This indicates the occipito-pollicalis associated with bat wings is derived from cranial paraxial mesoderm that later migrates into the second pharyngeal arch of the embryo. This is mostly consistent with results based on the dissection of adult bats15. The coraco-cutaneus and humeropatagialis within the plagiopatagium were innervated by spinal nerves that constitute the brachial plexus: cervical nerves 5–8 (C5–C8) and thoracic nerve 1 (T1) (Fig. 2c; Supplementary Movies). This indicates these muscles share their developmental origin with muscles developed in the forelimb. The uropatagialis within the uropatagium is innervated by a group of spinal nerves that constitute the lumbar and sacral plexuses, especially by the nerve branch that topologically corresponds to the branch innervating the anteromedial part of the semitendinosus in mouse embryos (Supplementary Fig. S2; Supplementary Movies). This indicates the muscle shares a developmental origin with skeletal muscles of the hind limb. As a whole, these data suggest that multiple populations of muscle precursors with different ontogenetic origins were involved in building the bat wing.
Outgrowth of wing membranes and expansion of wing muscles
Through inspection of the pattern of wing muscle development, we found a spatiotemporal correlation between the outgrowth of wing membranes and expansion of the mass of wing muscle precursors towards the membranes. In the neck/shoulder region of bat embryos, the primordium of the occipito-pollicalis expanded in a posterior–lateral direction towards the growing propatagium (Fig. 3a; Supplementary Fig. S3). We confirmed the coraco-cutaneus and humeropatagialis complex originated from migrating muscle precursors that delaminated from the ventrolateral lips of dermomyotome of somites at the limb level (Supplementary Fig. S4). At stage 14L, the wing muscle complex shared a common muscle progenitor with the cutaneus maximus, which expanded in a postero-dorsal direction in later stages (Fig. 3e). Interestingly, the wing muscle complex was separated from the cutaneus maximus progenitor by a population of non-muscle (Lbx1 negative) connective tissues and expanded in a posterior–lateral direction towards growing plagiopatagium in subsequent embryonic stages (Fig. 3f; supplementary Fig. S5). A similar pattern of muscle development also was observed in the uropatagium (Supplementary Fig. S2). These data suggest that the tissue of the wing membrane likely has an important role in determining the architectural pattern of bat wing muscles.
Fgf10 signalling in bat wing development
To date, the molecular mechanism underlying the development of the bat wing membrane has not been understood, with the exception of one report that the modulation of Bmp and Fgf signalling has a role in blocking apoptosis of interdigital tissue to make the interdigital wing membrane (chiropatagium)16. Through comparative expression analysis of the genes that are known to regulate limb morphogenesis, we found Fgf10 signalling is likely involved in wing membrane development and patterning of the wing muscles. As reported in murine embryogenesis17, Fgf10 was expressed at the otic vesicle, pharyngeal arches and limb mesenchyme, as well as lateral plate mesoderm of the flank region of bat embryos at stage 13 (Fig. 4a–c). Interestingly, Fgf10 continued to be expressed in the lateral plate-derived mesenchyme at the anterior-proximal part of the forelimb, flank and posterior-proximal part of hind limb of bat embryos at stage 13L and 14 (Figs 4d,f and 5a–c; Supplementary Fig. S2), although expression of Fgf10 ceased in corresponding tissues of stage-matched mouse, marsupial opossum and chick embryos17,18,19. We also examined expression of Fgfr2IIIb that encodes the receptor of Fgf10 in bat embryos, and detected its expression in epidermis over the flank region of Fgf10-expressing lateral plate mesoderm, as well as in epidermis of the limb buds and lateral plate mesoderm anterior to the forelimb bud at stage 13L (Fig. 4e). Concordant with a previous report20, Fgf8 was not expressed in the primordia of pro-, plagio- and uropatagium throughout embryogenesis, but only expressed in the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) postcranially (Fig. 4h). These results indicate that Fgf10 signalling is activated in the embryonic tissues where future wing membranes develop.
In bat embryos at stage 14L the primordium of plagiopatagium appeared posterior to the forelimb as a bud-like structure. We detected Fgf10 in the mesenchyme that populates in the primordium of plagiopatagium as well as in the mesenchyme of the forelimb (Fig. 5d; Supplementary Fig. S6). Fgfr2IIIb also was expressed in the epidermis over the forelimb and the primordium of plagiopatagium (Fig. 5e). At this period of bat embryogenesis, we did not observe myocytes that express lineage-specific markers such as Pax3 and Lbx1 inside the primordium of plagiopatagium (Fig. 5f; Supplementary Fig. S6). Furthermore, Tcf4, which is known as a good marker for lateral plate-derived limb connective tissue and regulates the spatial pattern of limb muscles21,22, was not expressed in the mesenchyme within the plagiopatagium (Supplementary Fig. S6). In the subsequent embryonic stage, where the precursor of the coraco-cutaneus and humeropatagialis complex starts to populate inside the plagioptagium, expression of Fgf10 was restricted to the connective tissue in close proximity to these wing muscles (Fig. 5g; Supplementary Fig. S6). We observed a similar pattern of Fgf10 expression in propatagium and uropatagium as well (Supplementary Figs S2 and S7).
Discussion
In vertebrates, skeletal muscles which form in the head, trunk and limbs are patterned by extrinsic cues from surrounding tissues to adopt specific arrangements of muscle fibres in the adult form23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31. For example, somite-derived limb muscle precursor cells migrate into the limb bud which is filled with lateral plate-derived connective tissue. There, the muscles are extrinsically patterned by the connective tissues in later embryonic stages32,33. In bat embryogenesis, we observed a spatiotemporal correlation between the outgrowth of wing membranes and expansion of the mass of wing muscle precursors towards the membranes. The mass of all the wing muscle precursors we examined consistently expanded towards the growing wing membranes. The wing muscle precursors did not expand into other directions within the embryonic body nor stop their expansion around the domain where they originated. This suggests that the mode of bat wing muscle patterning resembles that of limb muscle patterning in which the limb bud filled with lateral plate-derived connective tissue dictates the patterning of the muscles migrated from the somites. On the basis of these observations, it appears reasonable to regard the wing membranes as a potential candidate tissue for patterning of the wing muscles. To obtain direct evidence that the wing membranes regulate patterning of the bat wing muscles, experimental approaches such as heterotopic transplantation of bat wing membrane tissues into ‘non-wing’ domains of mammalian embryos will be helpful.
Through gene expression analysis in bat embryos, we observed Fgf8 expression in the AER of the limb and the absence of its expression in the tissue of all wing membranes we examined. Instead, we observed expression of Fgf10 not only in limb mesenchyme but also in the mesenchyme of the wing membrane primordia. Furthermore, expression of the gene encoding the receptor of Fgf10, Fgfr2IIIb, was detected in the overlaying epidermis and some populations of the underlying mesenchyme of the wing membrane primordia and in the limb epidermis, including the AER. In vertebrates, maintenance of proximodistal outgrowth of the embryonic limbs requires Fgf10 in the mesenchyme to activate Fgf8 in the AER, which in turn promotes mesenchymal outgrowth18,34,35,36. It appears that the outgrowths of the anterior, lateral and interfemoral wing membranes formed in bat embryos are achieved by a molecular mechanism that is partly different from that regulating the outgrowth of the limb. In terms of the mode of the tissue outgrowth, the primordia of these wing membranes more closely resemble other types of epithelial appendages such as feather buds in birds, secondary palate in mammals and external genitalia where Fgf10 signalling regulates their outgrowth37,38,39.
As mentioned above, in principle, the architectural pattern of skeletal muscles is determined extrinsically by surrounding muscle connective tissue in vertebrate embryos. It has been reported that Tcf4, a downstream effecter of canonical Wnt signalling that has pivotal roles in limb development, is expressed in lateral plate-derived limb connective tissue and regulates patterning of somite-derived limb muscles21,22. Therefore, we focused on this gene and examined its expression pattern in bat embryos. Intriguingly, expression of Tcf4 is detected in limb connective tissue, as in chicken and mouse embryos, but not in connective tissue within the wing membranes. Instead, we observed continued expression of Fgf10 in connective tissue within the wing membranes. Showing analogy with the spatiotemporal pattern of Tcf4 expression in the limbs, Fgf10 expression was detected in connective tissue of the nascent plagiopatagium and its expression preceded the entering of wing muscles into the membrane. In later stage embryos, expression domain of Fgf10 was restricted in the connective tissue adjacent to the wing muscles. Such spatiotemporal correlations between Fgf10 expression and the development of wing muscles were observed in the propatagium and uropatagium, as well.
On the basis of the results of our minute description of bat wing morphogenesis, we speculate that Fgf10 may be a key molecule involved in the process of wing muscle patterning, as Tcf4 is in limb muscle patterning. Although molecular mechanisms controlling the organization of skeletal muscle in space during vertebrate development are not fully understood, signalling molecules secreted from non-myogenic mesenchyme or muscle connective tissue, as well as cell adhesion molecules localized at the cell membrane of muscle connective tissue, potentially affect the architectural pattern of muscles21,22,30,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48. In tongue morphogenesis, cranial neural crest-derived tongue muscle connective tissue is required for organizing occipital somite-derived tongue muscle cells49. In this process, Fgf10 secreted from the surrounding muscle connective tissue possibly controls myogenic cell proliferation and potentially influences the organization of tongue muscle49. Fgf10 signal-mediated cell–cell interactions involved in other developmental events50,51,52 also may contribute to the formation of unique wing muscles in bats. To uncover the role of Fgf10 in bat wing morphogenesis, functional analysis of this gene in bat embryos should be performed in the future.
For the evolution of the flight apparatus in bats, we suppose that a two-step developmental mechanism was important (Fig. 5j). The first step is the establishment of the field for wing membrane formation possibly achieved by spatially unique activation of Fgf10 signalling in early stage bat embryos. The second step is the alteration of skeletal muscle pattern, perhaps driven by connective tissue filling the wing membranes, to make unique wing muscles. In bat embryogenesis, the outgrowth of wing membranes and wing myogenesis precede the elongation of zeugopodial and autopodial skeletons of the forelimb and retention of the tissue that gives rise to the chiropatagium, other vital events for bats to achieve powered flight. It would be interesting to further investigate how unique activation of Fgf10 signalling in wing membrane progenitors influences these upcoming embryonic events, as well as to identify the molecular basis which allows the novel anterior–posterior expanded Fgf10 expression we observed in non-limb lateral plate mesoderm of bat embryos.
Primitive bat species such as Onychonycteris and Icaronycteris index had well-developed wings, implying that they were capable of powered flight6. Although the soft tissue anatomy of these fossil species is not well understood, the impression of wing membranes on some fossils indicates the presence of wing muscles in these animals13. Therefore, the developmental programme that mobilizes adjacent muscular tissues for the precursors of the wing membranes might have been adopted in the initial phase of chiropteran evolution, in parallel with the acquisition of the wing itself. Furthermore, recent molecular phylogeny of extant bat species clearly identifies two major lineages within the order—suborders Yinpterochiroptera and Yangochiroptera2,53,54. In the present study, we revealed that the occipito-pollicalis of Miniopterus fuliginosus (family Miniopteridae), which is a member of Yangochiroptera, is solely innervated by cranial nerve VII. According to previous studies13,15, the muscle complex of Pteropus (family Pteropodidae), which belongs to Yinpterochiroptera, is innervated by not only cranial nerve VII but also cervical nerves. Also, in contrast to the simple organization of the occipito-pollicalis in Miniopterus, that in Pteropus is reportedly more complex, composed of several muscle bellies13,15. We predict that the more complicated organization and innervation patterns of the occipito-pollicalis seen in pteropodid bats were brought about by the acquisition of unidentified novel developmental programs for establishing such anatomical features after they diverged from the common ancestor of Yangochiroptera or other lineages of Yinpterochiroptera. To better understand the developmental basis of bat wing muscle evolution, sampling embryos from a variety of chiropteran lineages, both Yinpterochiroptera and Yangochiroptera, and comparing their development will be necessary.
Methods
Sample collection and staging of embryos
Adult female Pipistrellus abramus (family Vespertilionidae) were captured in Kyoto prefecture, Japan, during the breeding seasons of 2005, 2006, 2008 and 2010. Adult female Miniopterus fuliginosus (family Miniopteridae) were collected in Wakayama prefecture, Japan, during the breeding seasons of 2009 and 2011. These animals were brought to the laboratory and killed after anesthetization by exposure to diethyl ether. The uteri were removed from the abdominal cavity of the animals and transferred to Petri dishes filled with 0.1 M PBS on ice. The walls of the uteri were cut open to remove the embryos, and then the embryos were excised with forceps from the surrounding extraembryonic membranes. Pregnant females of wild-type mice (ICR) were purchased commercially and embryos were sampled following standard protocol. Staging of bat embryos was as per previous studies55,56. Comparison of embryos between bats and mice was performed following the method of a previous study56. All animal experiments were approved by the University of Tsukuba Committee for Animal Care.
Cloning of genes
Total RNA was extracted from embryos using ISOGEN reagent (NIPPON GENE CO., LTD). RT–PCR was performed to amplify fragments of Pipistrellus Hgf and Pax3, and Miniopterus c-Met, Fgfr2IIIb, Fgf10, Lbx1, Myogenin (Myog) and Tcf4 messenger RNA using primer sets that are available upon request. These fragments were isolated using the pGEM T-easy vector systems (Promega) or TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen) and sequenced using an ABI 3130 sequencer (Applied Biosystems). To identify the orthologous genes of the isolated fragments, comparable sequence data were surveyed using a BLAST search, and phylogenetic trees with neighbour joining method were constructed after sequence alignment using the CLUSTALX software. All new DNA sequence data were deposited in the DDBJ database (AB761037, AB761038, AB761039, AB761040, AB761041, AB761042, AB761043 and AB761044).
Gene expression analysis
After fixing embryos in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), whole-mount in situ hybridization of bat and mouse embryos was conducted following a standard protocol57. For section in situ hybridization, embryos were fixed in 4% PFA, dehydrated using a methanol series, placed in xylene, embedded in paraffin and sliced with a microtome. Serial sections were hybridized with digoxigenin-labelled riboprobes as described in Neubüser et al.58 with slight modifications. To detect expression of Lbx1 and Pax3 genes in mouse tissues, antisense RNA riboprobes constructed from complementary DNA sequences of bats were used. To detect expression of Fgf8 genes in bat tissues, RNA probe of mouse was used following the method of Weatherbee et al.16 Generally, hetero-specific RNA probes easily hybridize with the transcripts among mammalian lineages, because of the low level of nucleotide sequence variation in the protein-coding regions of genes57,59. To confirm the expression pattern of each gene, two to four individual bat embryos were analysed for each stage.
Muscle and nerve staining
To visualize skeletal muscles and peripheral nerves whose motor branches innervate skeletal muscles in embryogenesis, whole-mount immunohistochemistry of anti-skeletal muscle myosin (MF20, DSHB) and anti-neurofilament (3A10, DSHB) antibodies were conducted following a standard protocol60. To confirm the localization pattern of myosin protein, two to four individual bat embryos were analysed for each stage. As MF20-stained mouse embryos tended to have non-specific background signals, possibly due to the reaction of secondary antibody against endogenous mouse IgG, whole-mount in situ hybridization of MyoD that continues to be expressed even in differentiated skeletal muscles of late stage embryos was alternatively used for muscle visualization in mouse embryos.
Analysis of muscle innervation pattern
The embryos were fixed with Serra’s fixative for 24 h, dehydrated using an ethanol series, placed in xylene, embedded in paraffin and sliced at a thickness of 12 μm. After deparaffinization of the sliced sections, immunohistochemistry of anti-acetylated tubulin (6-11B-1, SIGMA) monoclonal antibody was carried out to label nerve tissues. Subsequently, cell nuclei were stained with haematoxylin to distinguish muscular tissues from other tissues morphologically. Sections were photographed with a digital camera (VB-6010, KEYENCE) mounted on a dissection microscope (AZ100, Nikon). Amira 5.0 software was used to digitally reconstruct the sectioned and stained embryos in three dimensions, following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Tokita, M. et al. The developmental basis of bat wing muscle. Nat. Commun. 3:1302 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2298 (2012).
References
Nowak R. M. Walker’s Bats of the World Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.
Altringham J. D. Bats: From Evolution to Conservation Oxford University Press (2011).
Springer M. S. & Murphy W. J. Mammalian evolution and biomedicine: new views from phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 82, 375–392 (2007).
Speakman J. R. The evolution of flight and echolocation in bats: another leap in the dark. Mammal. Rev. 31, 111–130 (2001).
Gunnell G. F. & Simmons N. B. Fossil evidence and the origin of bats. J. Mammal. Evol. 12, 209–246 (2005).
Simmons N. B., Seymour K. L., Habersetzer J. & Gunnell G. F. Primitive early Eocene bat from Wyoming and the evolution of flight and echolocation. Nature 451, 818–821 (2008).
Sears K. E., Behringer R. R., Rasweiler J. J. & Niswander L. A. Development of bat flight: morphologic and molecular evolution of bat wing digits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 6581–6586 (2006).
Cooper L. N., Cretekos C. J. & Sears K. E. The evolution and development of mammalian flight. WIREs Dev. Biol. 1, 773–779 (2012).
Eiting T. P. & Gunnell G. F. Global completeness of the bat fossil record. J. Mammal. Evol. 16, 151–173 (2009).
Cretekos C. J. et al. Regulatory divergence modifies limb length between mammals. Genes Dev. 22, 141–151 (2008).
Wible J. R. & Novacek M. J. Cranial evidence for the monophyletic origin of bats. Am. Mus. Novitates 2911, 1–19 (1988).
Baker J., Novacek J. & Simmons N. B. On the monophyly of bats. Syst. Zool. 40, 216–231 (1991).
Thewissen J. G. & Babcock S. K. The origin of flight in bats: to go where no mammal has gone before. BioScience 42, 340–345 (1992).
Neuweiler G. The Biology of Bats Oxford University Press, 2000).
Thewissen J. G. & Babcock S. K. Distinctive cranial and cervical innervation of wing muscles: new evidence for bat monophyly. Science 251, 934–936 (1991).
Weatherbee S. D., Behringer R. R., Rasweiler J. J. & Niswander L. A. Interdigital webbing retention in bat wings illustrates genetic changes underlying amniote limb diversification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15103–15107 (2006).
Veltmaat J. M. et al. Gli3-mediated somitic Fgf10 expression gradients are required for the induction and patterning of mammary epithelium along the embryonic axes. Development 133, 2325–2335 (2006).
Ohuchi H. et al. The mesenchymal factor, FGF10, initiates and maintains the outgrowth of the chick limb bud through interaction with FGF8, an apical ectodermal factor. Development 124, 2235–2244 (1997).
Keyte A. L. & Smith K. K. Developmental origins of precocial forelimbs in marsupial neonates. Development 137, 4283–4294 (2010).
Cretekos C. J., Deng J.M., Green E. D., Rasweiler J. J. & Behringer R. R. Isolation, genomic structure and developmental expression of Fgf8 in the short-tailed fruit bat, Carollia perspicillata. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 51, 333–338 (2007).
Kardon G., Harfe B. D. & Tabin C. J. A Tcf4-positive mesodermal population provides a prepattern for vertebrate limb muscle patterning. Dev. Cell 5, 937–944 (2003).
Mathew S. J. et al. Connective tissue fibroblasts and Tcf4 regulate myogenesis. Development 138, 371–384 (2011).
Chevallier A., Kieny M. & Mauger A. Limb-somite relationship: origin of the limb musculature. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 41, 245–258 (1977).
Christ B., Jacob H. J. & Jacob M. Experimental analysis of the origin of the wing musculature in avian embryos. Anat. Embryol. 150, 171–186 (1977).
Kardon G., Campbell J. K. & Tabin C. J. Local extrinsic signals determine muscle and endothelial cell fate and patterning in the vertebrate limb. Dev. Cell 3, 533–545 (2002).
Evans D. J. R., Valasek P., Schmidt C. & Patel K. Skeletal muscle translocation in vertebrates. Anat. Embryol. 211, S43–S50 (2006).
Rinon A. et al. Cranial neural crest cells regulate head muscle patterning and differentiation during vertebrate embryogenesis. Development 134, 3065–3075 (2007).
Tokita M. & Schneider R. A. Developmental origins of species-specific muscle pattern. Dev. Biol. 331, 311–325 (2009).
Theis S. et al. The occipital lateral plate mesoderm is a novel source for vertebrate neck musculature. Development 137, 2961–2971 (2010).
Hasson P. “Soft” tissue patterning: muscles and tendons of the limb take their form. Dev. Dyn. 240, 1100–1107 (2011).
Valasek P. et al. Cellular and molecular investigations into the development of the pectoral girdle. Dev. Biol. 357, 108–116 (2011).
Nowicki J. L., Takimoto R. & Burke A. C. The lateral somitic frontier: dorso-ventral aspects of anterio-posterior regionalization in avian embryos. Mech. Dev. 120, 227–240 (2003).
Shearman R. M. & Burke A. C. The lateral somitic frontier in ontogeny and phylogeny. J. Exp. Zool. B. Mol. Dev. Evol. 312, 603–612 (2009).
Min H. et al. Fgf-10 is required for both limb and lung development and exhibits striking functional similarity to Drosophila branchless. Genes Dev. 12, 3156–3161 (1998).
Sekine K. et al. Fgf10 is essential for limb and lung formation. Nat. Genet. 21, 138–141 (1999).
Liu Y., Liu C., Yamada Y. & Fan C. M. Growth arrest specific gene 1 acts as a region-specific mediator of the Fgf10/Fgf8 regulatory loop in the limb. Development 129, 5289–5300 (2002).
Mandler M. & Neubüser A. FGF signaling is required for initiation of feather placode development. Development 131, 3333–3343 (2004).
Rice R. et al. Disruption of Fgf10/Fgfr2b-coordinated epithelial-mesenchymal interactions causes cleft palate. J. Clin. Invest. 113, 1692–1700 (2004).
Satoh Y. et al. Regulation of external genitalia development by concerted actions of FGF ligands and FGF receptors. Anat. Embryol. 208, 479–486 (2004).
Amthor H., Christ B., Weil M. & Patel K. The importance of timing differentiation during limb muscle development. Curr. Biol. 8, 642–652 (1998).
Duprez D., Lapointe F., Edom-Vovard F., Kostakopoulou K. & Robson L. Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) specifies muscle pattern at tissue and cellular chick level, in the chick limb bud. Mech. Dev. 82, 151–163 (1999).
Ahn S. & Joyner A. L. Dynamic changes in the response of cells to positive hedgehog signaling during mouse limb patterning. Cell 118, 505–516 (2004).
Duprez D. Signals regulating muscle formation in the limb during embryonic development. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 46, 915–925 (2002).
Edom-Vovard F. & Duprez D. Signals regulating tendon formation during chick embryonic development. Dev. Dyn. 229, 449–457 (2004).
Hasson P. et al. Tbx4 and Tbx5 acting in connective tissue are required for limb muscle and tendon patterning. Dev. Cell 18, 148–156 (2010).
Wang H. et al. Bmp signaling at the tips of skeletal muscles regulates the number of fetal muscle progenitors and satellite cells during development. Dev. Cell 18, 643–654 (2010).
Anderson C. et al. Sonic hedgehog acts cell-autonomously on muscle precursor cells to generate limb muscle diversity. Genes. Dev. 26, 2103–2117 (2012).
Hu J. K., McGlinn E., Harfe B. D., Kardon G. & Tabin C. J. Autonomous and nonautonomous roles of Hedgehog signaling in regulating limb muscle formation. Genes. Dev. 26, 2088–2102 (2012).
Hosokawa R. et al. TGF-beta mediated FGF10 signaling in cranial neural crest cells controls development of myogenic progenitor cells through tissue-tissue interactions during tongue morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 341, 186–195 (2010).
Tao H. et al. A dual role of FGF10 in proliferation and coordinated migration of epithelial leading edge cells during mouse eyelid development. Development 132, 3217–3230 (2005).
Nomura S. et al. FGF10/FGFR2 signal induces cell migration and invasion in pancreatic cancer. Brit. J. Cancer 99, 305–313 (2008).
Vega-Hernández M., Kovacs A., De Langhe S. & Ornitz D. M. FGF10/FGFR2b signaling is essential for cardiac fibroblast development and growth of the myocardium. Development 138, 3331–3340 (2011).
Teeling E. C. et al. A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record. Science 307, 580–584 (2005).
Eick G. N., Jacobs D. S. & Matthee C. A. A nuclear DNA phylogenetic perspective on the evolution of echolocation and historical biogeography of extant bats (Chiroptera). Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1869–1886 (2005).
Tokita M. Normal embryonic development of the Japanese pipistrelle, Pipistrellus abramus. Zoology 109, 137–147 (2006).
Hockman D., Mason M. K., Jacobs D. S. & Illing N. The role of early development in mammalian limb diversification: a descriptive comparison of early limb development between the Natal long-fingered bat (Miniopterus natalensis) and the mouse (Mus musculus). Dev. Dyn. 238, 965–979 (2009).
Rasweiler J. J. 4th, Cretekos C. J. & Behringer R. R. Whole-mount in situ hybridization of short-tailed fruit bat (Carollia perspicillata) embryos with RNA probes. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 3, pdb.prot 5164 (2009).
Neubüser A., Koseki H. & Balling R. Characterization and developmental expression of Pax9, a paired-box-containing gene related to Pax1. Dev. Biol. 170, 701–716 (1995).
Hockman D. et al. A second wave of Sonic hedgehog expression during the development of the bat limb. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16982–16987 (2008).
Rasweiler J. J. 4th, Cretekos C. J. & Behringer R. R. Whole-mount immunohistochemistry of short-tailed fruit bat (Carollia perspicillata). Cold Spring Harb Protoc 3, pdb.prot 5167 (2009).
Acknowledgements
We thank Hiroshi Wada who allowed the use of facilities for experiments and analyses, Matthew Wood for editing the manuscript, and Brock Fenton for thoughtful comments and suggestions to improve the manuscript. The MF20 and 3A10 antibodies were obtained from DSHB, maintained by University of Iowa under the auspices of the NICHD. This study was partly supported by Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant to M.T. (22-501).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.T. designed the study. M.T. and T.A. performed experiments and analysed the data. M.T., T.A. and K.S. collected and prepared animal samples. M.T. wrote the paper with the assistance of T.A. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Figures
Supplementary Figures S1-S7 (PDF 3688 kb)
Supplementary Movie 1
A 3D model focusing on innervation of the muscles associated with the ear and the neck of mouse embryo at E14.0. The still image of this movie is given in Figure 2a. (MOV 5275 kb)
Supplementary Movie 2
A 3D model focusing on innervation of the proximal element of the occipito-pollicalis associated with the propatagium of bat embryo at stage 17. The still image of this movie is given in Figure 2b. (MOV 5126 kb)
Supplementary Movie 3
A 3D model focusing on innervation of skeletal muscles in shoulder and upper arm regions of mouse embryo at E14.0. The still image of this movie is given in Figure 2c. (MOV 5187 kb)
Supplementary Movie 4
A 3D model focusing on innervation of the coraco-cutaneus and humeropatagialis muscle complex associated with the plagiopatagium of bat embryo at stage 17. The still image of this movie is given in Figure 2d. (MOV 5225 kb)
Supplementary Movie 5
A 3D model focusing on innervation of skeletal muscles accompanied with the hind limb of mouse embryo at E14.0. The still images of this movie are given in Supplementary Figure S2g and Supplementary Figure S2h. (MOV 5284 kb)
Supplementary Movie 6
A 3D model focusing on innervation of the muscles accompanied with the hind limb and uropatagium of bat embryo at stage 17 that allows the architectural pattern to be observed from all angles. The still images of this movie are given in Supplementary Figure S2i and Supplementary Figure S2j. (MOV 5194 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tokita, M., Abe, T. & Suzuki, K. The developmental basis of bat wing muscle. Nat Commun 3, 1302 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2298
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2298
This article is cited by
-
Sesamoids and Morphological Variation: a Hypothesis on the Origin of Rod-like Skeletal Elements in Aerial Mammals
Journal of Mammalian Evolution (2022)
-
Creating diversity in mammalian facial morphology: a review of potential developmental mechanisms
EvoDevo (2018)
-
Mammalian organogenesis in deep time: tools for teaching and outreach
Evolution: Education and Outreach (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.