Abstract
Undesired electrode–electrolyte interactions prevent the use of many high-energy-density cathode materials in practical lithium-ion batteries. Efforts to address their limited service life have predominantly focused on the active electrode materials and electrolytes. Here an advanced three-dimensional chemical and imaging analysis on a model material, the nickel-rich layered lithium transition-metal oxide, reveals the dynamic behaviour of cathode interphases driven by conductive carbon additives (carbon black) in a common nonaqueous electrolyte. Region-of-interest sensitive secondary-ion mass spectrometry shows that a cathode-electrolyte interphase, initially formed on carbon black with no electrochemical bias applied, readily passivates the cathode particles through mutual exchange of surface species. By tuning the interphase thickness, we demonstrate its robustness in suppressing the deterioration of the electrode/electrolyte interface during high-voltage cell operation. Our results provide insights on the formation and evolution of cathode interphases, facilitating development of in situ surface protection on high-energy-density cathode materials in lithium-based batteries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Considerable interest has been directed towards the development of reliable, low-cost, high-energy-density rechargeable Li-ion batteries to meet the demands of multiple emerging fields, such as advanced robotics, electric vehicles and grid storage1,2,3,4,5. This has motivated extensive investigation of cathode materials with higher operating voltages than conventional LiCoO2 (upper cutoff voltage of ∼4.2 V vs Li/Li+) to maximize energy-storage capabilities. Potential candidates include Ni-rich layered oxides6,7,8 (LiNi1-xMxO2 with M=metal ∼4.5 V), Li-rich layered oxides9,10,11 (Li1+xM1-xO2 with ∼4.7 V), high-voltage spinel oxides12,13 (LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 with ∼4.8 V) and high-voltage polyanionic compounds14,15,16 (phosphates and sulfates, up to ∼5.2 V). Unfortunately, these cathodes suffer from limited service life due to aggressive electrochemical degradation initiated at the electrode–electrolyte interface. This is largely caused by their operating voltages extending over the electrochemical stability window of most known nonaqueous electrolytes in lithium-ion batteries2,4,5,17. For instance, commercial ethylene carbonate (EC)-based electrolytes with lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6) as the salt have a stability window of ∼1.3–4.3 V vs Li/Li+. Moreover, oxidative decomposition of electrolyte components at high-voltage operation is not the only concern; often, surface degradation on cathodes involves active mass dissolution (for example, Mn2+) (refs 13, 18, 19, 20) and irreversible structural reconstruction (for example, cation migration) at highly delithiated states10,11,19,21,22,23.
As the quest for alternative, non-reacting electrolyte combinations is a formidable task, most efforts tackling the unsatisfactory cycle life of these high-voltage cathodes attempt to enhance the electrode–electrolyte interface stability with the formation of a stable, robust passivation film, similar to the solid-electrolyte interphase formed on graphite2,4,17,24. This is achieved ex situ by coating or doping of active cathode particles25,26,27, or in situ by employing electrolyte additives28,29. Despite some modest success, effective passivation of the cathode material surface (up to ∼5 V vs Li/Li+) remains challenging in the battery community2,4,5. The understanding of interphases formed on cathode materials in existing cell configurations is rather limited as well, in part due to complex influences of the ‘inactive’ conductive carbon additives (for example, carbon black) in composite electrodes, which have not been recognized until recently14,17,26,30,31,32. This is not surprising since commonly used surface-sensitive diagnostic tools, such as X-ray and infrared spectroscopies, cannot spatially separate different components in electrodes. Undoubtedly, studies on the dynamic formation and evolution of interphases (both spontaneous and under electrochemical cycling) involving the active material and carbon altogether are of pivotal importance and should provide insights on the disputable effects of cathode interphases4,5,14,18,33,34,35 on electrochemical properties and for further optimization.
Here we use time-of-flight secondary-ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) to investigate the electrode–electrolyte interphases and their impacts on overall cell performance on a Ni-rich layered oxide cathode (LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2), with a particular focus on the role of conductive carbon. TOF-SIMS offers sub-nanometer surface sensitivity and ultra-high chemical selectivity, and more importantly, region-of-interest (ROI) analysis can be applied to the composite electrode, enabling individual components to be observed independently36. Our results reveal the dominant influence of carbon on the surface chemistry of composite cathode electrodes in common nonaqueous electrolytes. The carbon-driven interphase formed in situ on LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2 before cell operation serves as a passivating film against deleterious interfacial reactions with the electrolyte.
Results
Visualization of interphases on cycled LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2
Figure 1a,b illustrate, respectively, the TOF-SIMS spectra and depth profiles of secondary ions of interest on LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2 electrodes during high-voltage electrochemical operation. In Fig. 1a, we witness rapid generation and subsequent marginal, prolonged buildup of organic interphasial species (represented by C2HO−), together with continuous accumulation of inorganic species during cycling (7LiF2−); the depth profiles in Fig. 1b, on the other hand, reveal the complex multi-layer characteristics of the interphases on LiNi1-xMxO2 particles. Both findings here are consistent with literature results5,13,17,18,33, where overall thickening of cathode interphases during cycling is often observed4,34,37. It has been noted that degradation products, including LiF and many organic species, appear localized at the very surface of the interphases (the outer layer), while transition-metal fluorides show high concentrations in the inner layer (where LiF is also abundant). These two ‘layers’ correspond to multiple processes of interfacial evolution of LiNi1-xMxO2 in common LiPF6/EC-based solutions: (i) deposition of salt and solvent (oxidative) decomposition products from the electrolyte4,5,18,33,35 and (ii) active mass dissolution aggravated by acidic species attack5,18,25,33 (for example, HF—generated in the presence of trace electrolyte impurities, such as H2O). Of particular note, another essential process, the intrinsic structural reconstruction from the layered to the ‘rock-salt’ phase (NiO), also occurs when destabilized transition-metal ions migrate towards neighbouring vacant Li sites at highly delithiated states19,21,22.
Illustrative TOF-SIMS chemical mappings were collected on LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2 composite electrodes after cycling (Fig. 1c). These maps show that the surface of active cathode particles (represented by the 58NiO− fragment), initially covered entirely by degradation-induced chemical species (represented by F−), emerges upon Cs+ sputtering. Detailed visualization in three dimensions of the chemical alterations occurring on the same sample is shown in Fig. 1d,e, and Supplementary Figs 2–4. Additional mappings on the pristine electrodes can be found in Supplementary Fig. 5. The typical surface degradation products in the outer and inner interphases4,5,18,33,35 are evidenced by cumulative signals of C2−, 7LiF2− and MnF2− in the top view before and after intensive Cs+ etching in Fig. 1d, as well as in the cross-sectional view with shallow Cs+ milling in Fig. 1e. These degradation products appear mostly located at the surface of secondary particles, although electrolyte penetration along with further attack through micro-cracks towards their interior is possible6,38,39. Notably, transition-metal species (58NiO− and MnF2−) are found on the carbon black/binder surface. It has been shown that the dissolution products from cathode particles eventually make their ways to the graphite anode surface while migrating within the electrolyte during cell operation4,7,12,13,34. A schematic diagram of the complex electrode-electrolyte interfacial chemical and structural evolution during battery operation is depicted in Fig. 1f, with further details in Supplementary Table 2.
Spontaneous interphase formation on composite cathode electrodes
Motivated by some recent studies14,26,30,31,32 reporting the dominating influence of additive conductive carbon (carbon black) on the behaviour of cathode interphases, we carried out TOF-SIMS measurements aided by ROI selection on aged LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2 composite electrodes in LiPF6/EC-DEC. Figure 2a demonstrates TOF-SIMS chemical mapping of two secondary ion fragments, 58NiO− (upper) and C3H− (lower), at the electrode surface, representative of active cathode particles and carbon black/binder, respectively. Two ROIs (ROI-1 and ROI-2) are used accordingly to extract the spectra in Fig. 2b,c. Clearly, the ROI selections are highly efficient in spatially separating the fragments of interest, 60Ni− (ROI-1) and C5− (ROI-2), as seen in Fig. 2b. In Fig. 2c, a series of TOF-SIMS spectra of C2F−, C3OF−, 7LiF2− and MnF3−, were retrieved from pristine and aged electrodes for 30 days with different amounts of carbon black (1 and 10 wt.%). Readily obvious is the increase of all four species after aging in both ROI-1 and ROI-2, indicative of ongoing electrode–electrolyte interactions before any electrical bias applied. The migration of active mass dissolution products (represented by 7LiF2− and MnF3−, as well as MnF2−, 58NiF3− and CoF3− in Supplementary Fig. 6) from the active particles towards carbon/binder regions is also evident, as these signals increase simultaneously in ROI-2. Interestingly, a dramatically larger amount of the dissolution products is found at the aged electrode surface with 1 wt.% carbon black compared with that with 10 wt.%. Moreover, in Fig. 2d, maps of 58NiO− on these aged electrodes suggest a much more severe extent of particle dissolution for the 1 wt.% carbon electrode. This indicates that the active cathode particles could be passivated against acid leaching from the electrolyte with the involvement of carbon black during interphases formation. Further evidence is needed, however, since carbon black, with a much larger relative surface area compared with LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2, serves as an effective acidic species scavenger for the 10 wt.% carbon electrode.
The surface species responsible for the C2F− and C3OF− fragments observed here originate primarily from two processes: (i) direct acidic species attack (HF) at the surface of carbon black, where dangling bonds of carbon and surface chemical functional groups (such as hydroxyl and carbonyl groups) are abundant and particularly susceptible26,30 and (ii) acidic species attack on carbonate solvents in LiPF6/EC-DEC electrolyte. In Fig. 2c, we notice that (i) in the ROI-1 spectra, intensities of C2F− and C3OF− are consistently lower than those in ROI-2, and (ii) the relative amounts of these fragments in ROI-1 compared with the pristine electrodes are increasing with that of carbon black. Additional evidence from fragments such as C3H2−, C3O2F− and C5OF− in good agreement can be found in Supplementary Fig. 7. These findings strongly support that the spontaneously produced surface deposits during aging, such as fluorinated alkane and carbonate species, are mainly a result of acidic species attack on carbon and actively migrate to the cathode particles surface once formed. The resulting surface layer is hereafter referred to as a cathode-electrolyte interphase (CEI), which further evolves upon cell operation. Note that the CEI defined in the current study only refers to the interphasial species produced from spontaneous reactions between carbon black and LiPF6/EC-DEC. Chemical mapping provides further support of such migration (Fig. 2d), with the cathode particles of 10 wt.% carbon black evidently covered by C2F− species; whereas for the 1 wt.% electrode, the coverage is less complete. Considering the well-known migration of dissolution products from cathode particles shown above, there exists a dynamic ‘communication’ between the active cathode material and conductive carbon additives during the spontaneous interphases formation in Li-ion batteries, which should have a profound impact on the electrochemical properties.
Tuning the thickness of spontaneously formed CEI
To verify the passivation effects of CEI during high-voltage electrochemical reactions, we prepared three LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2 samples with the same bulk chemical composition but different secondary particle sizes (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 8) through a transition-metal co-precipitation process8,40. This enables the direct modification of the CEI thickness, as the active material that has smaller relative surface area (larger particles, Supplementary Table 1) undergoes more in situ spontaneous deposition of surface species from carbon, as demonstrated in Fig. 3b. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) confirmed that all as-synthesized samples have a well-defined Rm layered structure with the cation mixing of around 3%, that is, the content of Ni ions in the Li layer (Supplementary Fig. 9)19,22,41. The electrochemical performance of LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2 materials in lithium half cells was recorded at room temperature. Figure 3c exhibits typical charge-discharge profiles of LiNi1-xMxO2 with a cutoff voltage of 4.5 V vs Li/Li+ (12–14 μm particle size shown; 8–10 and 18–20 μm particle size in Supplementary Fig. 11). In Fig. 3d–f, the three samples demonstrate different Coulombic efficiencies, hysteresis and capacity fades as cycling proceeds; the sample with larger particles shows better cycling stability. As seen in secondary electron microscopy images of cycled electrodes in Supplementary Figs 12–14, the majority of LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2 particles do not yet exhibit major mechanical fracture at such an early cycling stage (100 cycles) in contrast to many anodes, as their volume change during Li de-intercalation is small (∼5%). XRD on cycled electrodes (Supplementary Fig. 15) indicates a marginal increase in cation mixing while all samples retained a good overall layered structure with no apparent bulk phase transformation. Hence, the performance decline is primarily caused by rapid degradation of the electrode/electrolyte interface that induces large over-potentials during charge-discharge processes6,7,19,21,22,23, which is crucially related to the passivation effect of CEI.
Impedance spectroscopy was, therefore, employed to offer insight to the interfacial evolution for the three samples during cycling. Through this technique, the complex resistance or impedance of all components in an electrochemical cell can be determined33. Impedance spectra of LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2/Li half cells at different cycles are given in Fig. 3g,h, and in Supplementary Fig. 16. As a rule, the lower intercept at very high frequencies represents combined influences of electrolyte, current collector and separator resistances. The impedances obtained here are mostly indexed to Li-ion migration through surface films formed (spontaneously and electrochemically) on both Li metal anodes and LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2 cathodes (that is, the first high-frequency flat semicircle) and charge-transfer across the cathode active-material/surface-film interface (that is, the second semicircle at medium-to-low frequency range). Often, the interphasial species, such as ROCO2Li (refs 5, 33) and LiF (ref. 42), are highly resistive and yet enable facile Li diffusion during the intercalation process, while the interfacial charge transfer dominates and becomes greatly hurdled by the combined impacts of active mass dissolution and structural reconstruction at the particle surface. Indeed, the first semicircles are almost invisible compared with the second ones in the figure, indicative of negligible adverse kinetic impacts of CEI on Li-ion insertion/extraction. For each cell, the Li-ion transport appears more rapid for the sample of smaller particles, which can be ascribed to less CEI formation on the sample with larger surface area (Fig. 3b); meanwhile, a larger downward trend in the charge-transfer kinetics is observed. This explains the difference in cell performance among three samples in Fig. 3d–f and suggests that the CEI leads to suppression of the electrode/electrolyte interface deterioration during high-voltage battery operation.
Passivation of the electrode/electrolyte interface by CEI
We carried out detailed surface chemical and structural characterizations to provide direct evidence of this passivation effect. Compared with the electrode aged for 30 days without any electrical bias applied, the cycled electrode over the same period of time exhibits less amount of CEI species at the surface; in the meantime, high-voltage cycling notably accelerates active mass dissolution (Supplementary Fig. 19). It is expected that the spontaneously formed CEI will partially decompose at the highly oxidizing environment of ∼4.5 V. In Fig. 4, we present a quantitative investigation of the surface degradation owing to electrode-electrolyte reactivity during cell operation. Comparison of normalized TOF-SIMS depth profiles of representative CEI signals with ROI-1 (active particles) taken on samples at various cycles (3, 20 and 100) are shown in Fig. 4a and in Supplementary Figs 20–24. Their corresponding calculated CEI formation depth as a function of cycles is illustrated in Fig. 4b. In Fig. 4a,b, we witness a clear correlation between the LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2 secondary particle sizes and CEI formation depth (that is, larger particles lead to thicker CEIs). In contrast, such tendencies are reversed for the active mass dissolution products generated per unit area of the active material, which are more severe for the sample with smaller particles (Fig. 4c). Moreover, though damaged initially, the CEI appears somewhat stabilized during repeated charge-discharge cycles, whereas the dissolution products accumulate drastically. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis in Fig. 4d reveals the interphases on cycled LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2 electrodes similar to those reported in the literature on layered transition-metal oxides9,18,23,30 and further corroborates the differing degree of surface degradation among electrodes of different secondary particle sizes. The Ni 2p, F 1s, O 1s and C 1s regions high-resolution XPS spectra of representative pristine, aged and cycled electrodes, as well as pure NiF2, are depicted. The O 1s region reveals a native film mostly consisting of Li2CO3 on the LiNi1-xMxO2 pristine particles, and various electrolyte degradation products18,24 are generated during aging, such as semicarbonates, LiF, MFx, LixPOyFz and RCFx. In this study, as mentioned above, we focus on certain interphasial species that are mainly produced from spontaneous reactions between carbon black and LiPF6/EC-DEC (defined as the CEI here) and active mass dissolution products instead of those from other origins. For cycled electrodes, reduction in the amount of CEI species is noticed compared with the aged one (Fig. 4d). In support of TOF-SIMS results, the degree of dissolution products generation (NiF2) at the electrode surface is found larger for the sample with smaller secondary particles (Ni 2p, 8–10 μm); meanwhile, the CEI formation appears more pronounced for the sample with larger particle size (C 1s and O 1s, 18–20 μm). However, such comparison should be treated with caution, since XPS cannot selectively retrieve data from the interphases on the active material.
Another essential aspect of surface deterioration, that is, formation of the surface rock-salt phase (NiO) owing to intrinsic structure reconstruction, was also quantitatively analysed for LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2 electrodes cycled under similar conditions. In Fig. 5, high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images are displayed for samples of 8–10 and 18–20 μm in secondary particles size. The two distinct regions of the rock-salt Fmm and the original layered Rm structures, divided by a dashed line in Fig. 5b,g, are confirmed by corresponding fast Fourier transform patterns (Fig. 5b,g insets) and high-resolution HAADF images/signal-profiles taken at the interface region19,21,22 (Fig. 5c,d,f,h). As seen, the rock-salt phase becomes significantly thick after 100 cycles along lithium slabs (where Li-ion diffusion is more rapid) for both samples, and is featured by a porous structure from a clear difference in contrast between the outer surface and the inner bulk areas. This suggests that the highly localized active mass dissolution products form in corrosion pits, and are largely overlapped with the rock-salt phase regime at the surface. Note that it is generally challenging to spatially resolve these dissolved transition-metal species in high-resolution STEM characterization. HAADF-STEM patterns of pristine samples free of the electrochemically induced rock-salt phase can be found in Supplementary Figs 27–29. As seen, the extent of rock-salt phase formation for the two samples shows a similar tendency to that of dissolution products (Fig. 4c). TOF-SIMS depth profiles of referenced ratios between 58NiO− and 58Ni− (Supplementary Fig. 30), as well as XRD data for the three cycled electrodes−(Supplementary Fig. 15)—both of which can indicate the NiO formation—are in line with the HAADF-STEM results as well.
Discussion
On the basis of above results, we conclude that before electrochemical operation, conductive carbon additives (carbon black) readily react with the LiPF6/EC-based electrolyte upon contact, giving rise to a CEI that further evolves during cell operation and passivates the LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2 particles. By applying ROI analysis on the TOF-SIMS spectra, we show that this in situ generated CEI originates from the mutual exchange of interphasial species between the active cathode particles and carbon (Fig. 6). Undesired electrode–electrolyte interactions upon battery operation, however, cannot be entirely excluded due to incomplete CEI coverage, which also becomes further compromised in strongly oxidizing conditions up to 4.5 V vs Li/Li+. Moreover, we provide direct evidence of the overall protective nature of the CEI at cathode particles surface upon cycling, via TOF-SIMS, XPS and HAADF-STEM. By employing samples of different secondary particle sizes, we are able to alter the CEI thickness. For a fixed amount of carbon in the electrodes (10%), a thicker CEI adheres onto the active material with a smaller relative surface area (larger particles) during aging. Meanwhile, an unequivocal correlation between the thickness of CEI and the generation of degradation products is revealed among the three LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2 samples (Figs 3b, 4b,c and 5). The results show the spontaneously deposited CEI somewhat stabilizes during repeated cycling up to 4.5 V and to some extent suppresses the active mass dissolution and structural reconstruction at the particles surface, in good agreement with the impedance data in Fig. 3g,h. The evolution of CEI in thickness is similar to the observation of solid-electrolyte interphase growth on graphite43.
It is worth noting that the contribution of conductive carbon additives to the surface chemistry is not limited to composite cathode electrodes. Although different (oxidation and reduction) reactions are involved, the puzzling similar interphasial species identified on cathodes and anodes4,5,9,14,17,18,24,30,33 might be in part explained by the use of conductive carbon on both sides. The consistent open-circuit voltage (around 3 V) empirically observed for a broad spectrum of cathode and anode materials against Li metal before cell operation may also be related to the chemical reactivity of conductive carbon towards LiPF6-containing nonaqueous electrolytes, which spontaneously produces similar surface deposits on different electrode materials. In addition, the involvement of conductive carbon in the formation and evolution of cathode interphases is quite complex, and this study simply provides an intriguing glance into this phenomenon. To begin with, carbon generally possesses widely varying surface area and a diversity of surface chemical functional groups depending on the manufacturing processes. This can lead to unexpected interactions with the electrolyte and the CEIs generated may not be the same as that described here for different types of carbon additives in various cell chemistries. Further, the passivation effect of the carbon-driven CEI in simple LiPF6/EC-DEC solutions is far from ideal. The anodic instability of conductive carbon, including PF5− intercalation30,44,45 and direct oxidation31 at voltages approaching 5 V vs Li/Li+, also becomes detrimental to cyclability. Modifications on the electrolyte can produce more robust CEIs4,28,29, but the detailed functioning mechanisms of these changes are not well understood. Finally, the current study monitors only the CEI evolution in terms of thickness once the electrochemical reactions initiate, rather than the chemical composition and other important properties that are also relevant to the cell performance. Thus, future studies are needed to comprehensively delineate the role of carbon in affecting the surface chemistry of composite electrodes and electrochemical properties of Li-based batteries, which should assist the development of in situ passivation on high-voltage cathode materials.
In summary, our findings reveal the dynamic changes of interphases involving complex, intertwined ‘communications’ between the active cathode material (LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2) and conductive carbon additives in lithium-ion batteries, and their substantial repercussion on the electrochemical properties. Notably, the majority of studies on cathode interphases thus far underestimate the influences from carbon, thereby introducing ambiguities and inconsistencies. Although some have pointed out the need to study a model electrode material surface without the carbon additives and binder14,17, in the practical sense, the interphase behaviour only present when the active material and carbon coexist needs also to be emphasized. For example, the interactions of electrolyte additives with carbon itself and/or carbon-driven interphases generated spontaneously in nonaqueous electrolytes may have a role in their effectiveness. The development of tunable and well-controlled in situ surface passivation on electrodes by carbon might also be an alternative approach to mitigate the surface side reactions of high-voltage, high-energy-density cathode materials in lithium-based chemistries, provided that surface functionalization of conductive carbon materials is low-cost and easy-to-use. Conversely, such efforts should at the very least serve to understand and eliminate existing unwanted molecular interactions between the electrolyte and conductive carbon (for example, graphene). Finally, we underscore the benefits of surface-sensitive techniques (such as TOF-SIMS) that enable the spatially selective observation of composite electrodes in understanding the dynamic nature of electrode interphases formation and evolution before and during electrochemical reactions.
Methods
Preparation of LiNi0.7Co0.15 Mn0.15O2
LiNi0.7Co0.15 Mn0.15O2 powder was prepared by a two-step method: the transition-metal co-precipitation route and subsequent annealing-induced lithiation process. In the first step, NiSO4·6H2O, CoSO4·7H2O, and MnSO4·H2O were dissolved in distilled water at a combined concentration (molar ratio of Ni:Co:Mn=70:15:15) of 1.0 mol l−1. Then the mixed metal solution was pumped into a 2.5 l continuously stirring tank reactor, along with optimized amounts of saturated NH4OH and KOH aqueous solutions fed separately into the tank under protective gas. During the reaction, the pH (11–11.5), the stirring rate (800–1,000 r.p.m.), the temperature (50–60 °C), and the residence time (4–12 h) were controlled and monitored carefully. After the co-precipitation treatment, the resulting product Ni0.7Co0.15Mn0.15(OH)2 was washed thoroughly before drying at 100 °C under vacuum overnight. The LiNi0.7Co0.15 Mn0.15O2 powder was then obtained by heating the as-prepared compound mixed with LiOH·H2O at a molar ratio of 1:1.03 at 800 °C for 15 h in air. The mixture was preheated at 500 °C for 5 h before the final heating step.
Electrode fabrication and electrochemical testing
The electrochemical properties of the LiNi0.7Co0.15 Mn0.15O2 materials were studied with CR2032-type coin cells. For regular cell testing, the active material, conductive carbon additive (Super P, one type of carbon black), and binder (polyvinylidene fluoride) with the weight ratio of 80:10:10, respectively, were mixed and the resulting slurry was coated onto an aluminum foil with ∼4 mg cm−2 active material loading. A weight ratio of 88:1:11 was also used during the aging study to investigate the effect of carbon black. The obtained composite cathodes were assembled into coin cells with Li metal as both the counter and reference electrodes in an electrolyte solution of 1 M LiPF6 in a mixture of EC and diethyl carbonate (1:1, v/v). Galvanostatic discharge–charge experiments were registered on a 96-channel battery cycler (Arbin Instruments) between 3.0 and 4.5 V vs Li+/Li at room temperature. Impedance spectra were recorded on equilibrated cells stabilized after discharging to 3.0 V with the drift in open-circuit voltage no greater than 1 mV for 3 h, using an impedance spectrometer (Solartron 1260 A). In the impedance measurements, the a.c. frequency varied from 0.10 MHz to 2 mHz with a signal amplitude of 5 mV.
Materials characterization
Powder XRD was carried out on a MiniFlex 600 X-ray diffractormeter (Rigaku) with Cu Kα (λ=1.54184 Å) radiation. Scans were conducted at 5–80° at a scan rate of 0.5° min−1. Chemical compositions of the LiNi0.7Co0.15 Mn0.15O2 samples were determined by an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (Varian 715 ES). A NOVA 2000 surface area analyser (Quantachrome Instruments) was employed to obtain the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area of the as-prepared samples. Images of pristine LiNi0.7Co0.15 Mn0.15O2 powder and cycled composite electrodes were taken on a Quanta 650 ESEM field-emission scanning electron microscope (FEI) and a S5500 SEM/STEM scanning transmission electron microscope (Hitachi). An aberration-corrected field-emission JEM-2100F scanning transmission electron microscope (JEOL) was also used to identify the local surface structure of cycled cathode particles at atomic resolution operated at 200 kV. STEM images were observed with a probe convergence angle of 25 mrad and the HAADF detector were used with an angle of 163 mrad. XPS measurements were performed on an Axis Ultra DLD spectrometer (Kratos) using Al Kα radiation (1486.6 eV) as the excitation source. High-resolution scanning was taken near nickel, cobalt, manganese, fluorine, oxygen, carbon and lithium regions (0.1 eV step). XPS data of NiF2 (Matrix Scientific 99%) was also collected during the experiment. The pressure of the analysis chamber was maintained at around 2 × 10−9 mbar and the binding energy was calibrated with C 1s 248.8 eV. A TOF.SIMS 5 spectrometer (ION-TOF GmbH) was used for the TOF-SIMS studies. The analysis chamber was maintained in ultra-high vacuum at a pressure below 2 × 10−9 mbar. All detected secondary ions of interest had a mass resolution >5,000 and possessed negative polarity. A pulsed 30 keV Bi1+ (20 ns) ion beam set in either the High Current mode or Burst Alignment mode (with seven bursts) was applied for depth profiling or high lateral resolution mapping (<200 nm) analysis, respectively. The typical analysed area was 100 × 100 μm. A 500 eV Cs+ ion beam (sputtering rate estimated at ∼0.03 nm s−1, calibrated by a pristine LiNi0.7Co0.15Mn0.15O2 composite electrode) was used for sputtering of the cycled composite electrodes or shallow milling of the cross-sectioned samples with a typical sputtered area of 300 × 300 μm. During the XPS and TOF-SIMS analyses, all samples were rinsed in dimethyl carbonate and dried in an argon-filled glovebox, and then transferred to the instruments with a novel air-free interface (U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 14/445,650 filed 29 July 2014).
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Li, W. et al. Dynamic behaviour of interphases and its implication on high-energy-density cathode materials in lithium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 8, 14589 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14589 (2017).
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Armand, M. & Tarascon, J. M. Building better batteries. Nature 451, 652–657 (2008).
Goodenough, J. B. & Kim, Y. Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries. Chem. Mater. 22, 587–603 (2010).
Whittingham, M. S. Lithium batteries and cathode materials. Chem. Rev. 104, 4271–4302 (2004).
Xu, K. Electrolytes and interphases in Li-ion batteries and beyond. Chem. Rev. 114, 11503–11618 (2014).
Aurbach, D. et al. Review on electrode-electrolyte solution interactions, related to cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 165, 491–499 (2007).
Liu, W. et al. Nickel-rich layered lithium transition-metal oxide for high-energy lithium-ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 4440–4457 (2015).
Manthiram, A., Knight, J. C., Myung, S.-T., Oh, S.-M. & Sun, Y.-K. Nickel-rich and lithium-rich layered oxide cathodes: progress and perspectives. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1501010 (2016).
Sun, Y.-K. et al. High-energy cathode material for long-life and safe lithium batteries. Nat. Mater. 8, 320–324 (2009).
Yabuuchi, N., Yoshii, K., Myung, S.-T., Nakai, I. & Komaba, S. Detailed studies of a high-capacity electrode material for rechargeable batteries, Li2MnO3−LiCo1/3Ni1/3Mn1/3O2 . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 4404–4419 (2011).
Xu, B., Fell, C. R., Chi, M. & Meng, Y. S. Identifying surface structural changes in layered Li-excess nickel manganese oxides in high voltage lithium ion batteries: a joint experimental and theoretical study. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 2223–2233 (2011).
Sathiya, M. et al. Origin of voltage decay in high-capacity layered oxide electrodes. Nat. Mater. 14, 230–238 (2015).
Manthiram, A., Chemelewski, K. & Lee, E.-S. A perspective on the high-voltage LiMn1.5Ni0.5O4 spinel cathode for lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1339–1350 (2014).
Pieczonka, N. P. W. et al. Understanding transition-metal dissolution behavior in LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 high-voltage spinel for lithium ion batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 15947–15957 (2013).
Membreño, N., Park, K., Goodenough, J. B. & Stevenson, K. J. Electrode/electrolyte interface of composite α-Li3V2(PO4)3 cathodes in a nonaqueous electrolyte for lithium ion batteries and the role of the carbon additive. Chem. Mater. 27, 3332–3340 (2015).
Dimesso, L., Becker, D., Spanheimer, C. & Jaegermann, W. Investigation of graphitic carbon foams/LiNiPO4 composites. J. Solid State Electrochem. 16, 3791–3798 (2012).
Pivko, M. et al. Synthesis of nanometric LiMnPO4 via a two-step technique. Chem. Mater. 24, 1041–1047 (2012).
Gauthier, M. et al. Electrode-electrolyte interface in Li-ion batteries: current understanding and new insights. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 4653–4672 (2015).
Edström, K., Gustafsson, T. & Thomas, J. O. The cathode-electrolyte interface in the Li-ion battery. Electrochim. Acta 50, 397–403 (2004).
Lin, F. et al. Surface reconstruction and chemical evolution of stoichiometric layered cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 5, 3529 (2014).
Markevich, E. et al. Reasons for capacity fading of LiCoPO4 cathodes in LiPF6 containing electrolyte solutions. Electrochem. Commun. 15, 22–25 (2012).
Nam, K.-W. et al. Combining in situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction and absorption techniques with transmission electron microscopy to study the origin of thermal instability in overcharged cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 1047–1063 (2013).
Jung, S.-K. et al. Understanding the degradation mechanisms of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 cathode material in lithium ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1300787 (2014).
Cherkashinin, G., Motzko, M., Schulz, N., Späth, T. & Jaegermann, W. Electron spectroscopy study of Li[Ni,Co,Mn]O2/electrolyte interface: electronic structure, interface composition, and device implications. Chem. Mater. 27, 2875–2887 (2015).
Verma, P., Maire, P. & Novák, P. A review of the features and analyses of the solid electrolyte interphase in Li-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 55, 6332–6341 (2010).
Myung, S.-T. et al. Role of alumina coating on Li−Ni−Co−Mn−O particles as positive electrode material for lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 17, 3695–3704 (2005).
Qi, X. et al. Influence of thermal treated carbon black conductive additive on the performance of high voltage spinel Cr-doped LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 composite cathode electrode. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A339–A343 (2015).
Oh, P. et al. High-performance heterostructured cathodes for lithium-ion batteries with a Ni-rich layered oxide core and a Li-rich layered oxide shell. Adv. Sci 3, 1600184 (2016).
Schroder, K. et al. The effect of fluoroethylene carbonate as an additive on the solid electrolyte interphase on silicon lithium-ion electrodes. Chem. Mater. 27, 5531–5542 (2015).
Xu, M. et al. Development of novel lithium borate additives for designed surface modification of high voltage LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 cathodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 1308–1319 (2016).
Younesi, R. et al. Analysis of the interphase on carbon black formed in high voltage batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A1289–A1296 (2015).
Metzger, M., Marino, C., Sicklinger, J., Haering, D. & Gasteiger, H. A. Anodic oxidation of conductive carbon and ethylene carbonate in high-voltage Li-ion batteries quantified by on-line electrochemical mass spectrometry. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A1123–A1134 (2015).
Oh, G., Hirayama, M., Kwon, O., Suzuki, K. & Kanno, R. Bulk-type all solid-state batteries with 5 V class LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 cathode and Li10GeP2S12 solid electrolyte. Chem. Mater. 28, 2634–2640 (2016).
Aurbach, D. Review of selected electrode-solution interactions which determine the performance of Li and Li ion batteries. J. Power Sources 89, 206–218 (2000).
Dedryvère, R. et al. Electrode/electrolyte interface reactivity in high-voltage spinel LiMn1.6Ni0.4O4/Li4Ti5O12 lithium-ion battery. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 10999–11008 (2010).
Dupré, N. et al. Aging of the LiNi1 / 2Mn1 / 2O2 positive electrode interface in electrolyte. J. Electrochem. Soc. 156, C180–C185 (2009).
Chou, H., Ismach, A., Ghosh, R., Ruoff, R. S. & Dolocan, A. Revealing the planar chemistry of two-dimensional heterostructures at the atomic level. Nat. Commun. 6, 7482 (2015).
Duncan, H., Abu-Lebdeh, Y. & Davidson, I. J. Study of the cathode-electrolyte interface of LiMn1.5Ni0.5O4 synthesized by a sol-gel method for Li-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 157, A528–A535 (2010).
Kim, H., Kim, M. G., Jeong, H. Y., Nam, H. & Cho, J. A new coating method for alleviating surface degradation of LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2 cathode material: nanoscale surface treatment of primary particles. Nano Lett. 15, 2111–2119 (2015).
Watanabe, S., Kinoshita, M., Hosokawa, T., Morigaki, K. & Nakura, K. Capacity fade of LiAlyNi1−x−yCoxO2 cathode for lithium-ion batteries during accelerated calendar and cycle life tests (surface analysis of LiAlyNi1−x−yCoxO2 cathode after cycle tests in restricted depth of discharge ranges). J. Power Sources 258, 210–217 (2014).
Sun, Y.-K., Myung, S.-T., Kim, M.-H., Prakash, J. & Amine, K. Synthesis and characterization of Li[(Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1)0.8(Ni0.5Mn0.5)0.2]O2 with the microscale core−shell structure as the positive electrode material for lithium batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 13411–13418 (2005).
Reimers, J. N., Li, W. & Dahn, J. R. Short-range cation ordering in LixNi2-xO2 . Phys. Rev. B 47, 8486–8493 (1993).
Lu, Y., Tu, Z. & Archer, L. A. Stable lithium electrodeposition in liquid and nanoporous solid electrolytes. Nat. Mater. 13, 961–969 (2014).
Smith, A. J., Burns, J. C., Zhao, X., Xiong, D. & Dahn, J. R. A high precision coulometry study of the SEI growth in Li/graphite cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 158, A447–A452 (2011).
Syzdek, J., Marcinek, M. & Kostecki, R. Electrochemical activity of carbon blacks in LiPF6-based organic electrolytes. J. Power Sources 245, 739–744 (2014).
Kajiyama, A. et al. Principal factors of carbon conductive agents that contribute to the gas formation in high-voltage cathode systems. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A1516–A1522 (2015).
Lu, P. et al. Observation of electron-beam-induced phase evolution mimicking the effect of the charge-discharge cycle in Li-rich layered cathode materials used for Li ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 27, 1375–1380 (2015).
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies of the U.S. Department of Energy (Grant No. DE-EE0006447 and DE-EE0007762). The National Science Foundation Major Research Instrumentation program (DME-0923096) funded the time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometer. The TEM characterization work was supported by the IT R&D program of the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy/Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (MOTIE/KEIT) (Development of Li-rich Cathode and Carbon-free Anode Materials for High Capacity/High Rate Lithium Secondary Batteries, 10046306). The authors also thank Dr Shouliang Zhang for assistance with the ion-milling equipment and Dr Richard D. Piner for assistance with the optical profilometer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
W.L. and A.M. conceived the experiments. W.L. carried out the material synthesis and electrochemical work. W.L. and A.D. designed the TOF-SIMS characterization and data analysis. H.C. conducted the XPS measurement. P.O. and J.C. developed and S.P. performed the HAADF-STEM characterization. W.L., A.D. and A.M. wrote the paper with input from all authors. A.M. supervised the project.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 1-30 and Supplementary Tables 1-8 (PDF 8872 kb)
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Li, W., Dolocan, A., Oh, P. et al. Dynamic behaviour of interphases and its implication on high-energy-density cathode materials in lithium-ion batteries. Nat Commun 8, 14589 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14589
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14589
This article is cited by
-
Precisely succinonitrile-functionalized PEO electrolytes toward room-temperature all-solid-state lithium batteries
Science China Materials (2024)
-
Morphology controlled performance of ternary layered oxide cathodes
Communications Materials (2023)
-
Ultrahigh loading dry-process for solvent-free lithium-ion battery electrode fabrication
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Enhanced rate capability and cycling stability of conductive oxide-coated LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 for lithium-ion batteries
Ionics (2023)
-
High-mass loading Bi2O2CO3 nanoflakes with crystalline structure transition as cathode for alkaline zinc battery
Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.