Article | Open Access | Published:

Strong electronic interaction and multiple quantum Hall ferromagnetic phases in trilayer graphene

Nature Communications volume 8, Article number: 14518 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Quantum Hall effect provides a simple way to study the competition between single particle physics and electronic interaction. However, electronic interaction becomes important only in very clean graphene samples and so far the trilayer graphene experiments are understood within non-interacting electron picture. Here, we report evidence of strong electronic interactions and quantum Hall ferromagnetism seen in Bernal-stacked trilayer graphene. Due to high mobility 500,000 cm2 V−1 s−1 in our device compared to previous studies, we find all symmetry broken states and that Landau-level gaps are enhanced by interactions; an aspect explained by our self-consistent Hartree–Fock calculations. Moreover, we observe hysteresis as a function of filling factor and spikes in the longitudinal resistance which, together, signal the formation of quantum Hall ferromagnetic states at low magnetic field.

Introduction

Mesoscopic experiments tuning the relative importance of electronic interactions to observe complex ordered phases have a rich past1. While one class of experiments were conducted on bilayer two-dimensional electron systems (2DES) realized in semiconductor heterostructures, the other class of experiments focussed on probing multiple interacting sub-bands in quantum well structures2. There is an increasing interest in the electronic properties of few-layer graphene3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 as it offers a platform to study electronic interactions because the dispersion of bands can be tuned with number and stacking of layers in combination with electric field. Bernal/ABA-stacked trilayer graphene (ABA-TLG) provides a natural platform to observe such multi-subband physics as the band structure gives rise to monolayer-like (ML) and bilayer-like (BL) bands. The presence of the multiple bands and their Dirac nature lead to the possibility of observing an interesting interplay of electronic interactions in different channels leading to novel phases of the quantum Hall state.

Here we study the Landau-level (LL) spectrum on edge contacted ABA-TLG samples encapsulated in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) flakes. We observe the coexistence of both massless and massive Dirac fermions in the form of parabolically dispersed LL crossing points at low magnetic field. At intermediate magnetic field we show that the LL fan diagram indicates that the electron-electron interactions lead to formation of symmetry broken spin and valley-polarized states. Our self-consistent Hartree–Fock calculation supports the observed interaction enhanced LL gaps at the symmetry broken states. We also observe hysteretic transport showing the formation of quantum Hall ferromagnetic (QHF) states.

Results

Magnetotransport in ABA-trilayer graphene

Figure 1a shows the lattice structure of ABA-TLG with all the hopping parameters. We use Slonczewski–Weiss–McClure (SWMcC) parametrization of the tight binding model for ABA-TLG14,15 (with hopping parameters γ0, γ1, γ2, γ5 and δ) to calculate its low energy band structure. Definitions of all the hopping parameters are evident from Fig. 1a, and δ is the onsite energy difference of two inequivalent carbon atoms on the same layer. Its band structure, shown in Fig. 1b consists of both ML linear and BL quadratic bands16,17.

Figure 1: ABA-stacked trilayer graphene device and its electrical transport.
Figure 1

(a) Schematic of the crystal structure of ABA-TLG with all hopping parameters. (b) Low energy band structure of ABA-TLG around k point (−, 0) in the Brillouin zone. The wave vector is normalized with the inverse of the lattice constant (a=2.46 Å) of graphene. Black and blue lines denote the BL bands along kx and ky direction in the Brillouin zone whereas the red line denotes the ML band along both kx and ky. ML bands are separated by =2 meV and BL bands are separated by =14 meV. However, there is no band gap in total, semi-metallic nature of ABA-TLG is clear from the band overlap. (c) Optical image of the hBN encapsulated trilayer graphene device; Scale bar, 20 μm. White dashed line indicates the boundary of the ABA-TLG. The graphene sample is a slightly distorted rectangle, but the electrodes are designed in a Hall bar geometry. Length and breadth wise distance between furthest electrodes are 9.3 μm and 7.8 μm respectively. This makes the aspect ratio to be 1.19. Substrate consists of 30 nm thick hBN and 300 nm thick Silicon dioxide (SiO2) coated highly p-doped silicon, which also serves as a global back gate. (d) Room temperature and low temperature four-probe resistivity of the device as a function of Vbg.

Figure 1c shows an optical image of the device where the ABA-TLG graphene is encapsulated between two hBN flakes18. Four-probe resistivity (ρ) of the device is shown in Fig. 1d. The low disorder in the device is reflected in high mobility 500,000 cm2 V−1 s−1 on electron side and 800,000 cm2 V−1 s−1 on hole side; this leads to carrier mean free path in excess of 7 μm (see Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Note 1 for mobility and mean free path calculation). We measured one single gated device and one dual gated device on which we studied the effect of electric field. We found that the electron side data is relatively insensitive for low electric field range (<0.01 Vnm−1) (see Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Note 2 for dual gate device data). Due to the better quality of the single gated device we show the measurements done on the single gated device throughout the paper.

We next consider the magnetotransport in ABA-TLG that reveals the presence of LLs arising from both ML and BL bands. The LLs are characterized by the following quantum numbers: NM (NB) defines the LL index with M (B) indicating monolayer (bilayer)-like LLs, +(−) denotes the valley index of the LLs and ↑ (←) denotes the spin quantum number of the electrons. All the data shown in this paper, are taken at 1.5 K. Figure 2a shows the measured longitudinal resistance (Rxx) as a function of gate voltage (Vbg) and magnetic field (B) in the low B regime (see Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Note 3 for more data at low magnetic field). Observation of LLs up to very high filling factor ν=118 confirms the high quality of the device. Along with the usual straight lines in the fan diagram, we find additional interesting parabolic lines which arise because of LL crossings. Figure 2b shows the calculated non-interacting density of states (DOS) in the same parameter range which matches very well with the measured resistance. We find that the low B data can be well understood in terms of non-interacting picture and it allows determination of the band parameters.

Figure 2: Low magnetic field fan diagram.
Figure 2

(a) Colour plot of Rxx as a function of Vbg and B up to 1.5 T. The LL crossings arising from ML bands and BL bands are clearly seen. Each parabola is formed by the repetitive crossings of a particular ML LL with other BL LLs. Crossing between any two LLs shows up as Rxx maxima in transport measurement due to high DOS at the crossing points. The overlaid magenta line shows a line slice at Vbg=50 V. (b) DOS corresponding to a. NM=1 labelled parabola refers to all the crossing points arising from the crossings of NM=1 LL with other BL LLs. Other labels have a similar meaning. NM=0 LL does not disperse with B, hence the crossings form a straight line parallel to B axis. Minimum B is taken as 0.5 T to keep finite number of LLs in the calculation. The horizontal axis is converted from charge density to an equivalent Vbg after normalizing it by the capacitance per unit area (Cbg) for the ease of comparison with experimental fan diagram. Cbg is determined from the high B quantum Hall data which matches well with the geometrical capacitance per unit area of 30 nm hBN and 300 nm SiO2: Cbg105 μFm−2.

We now consider the LL fan diagram for a larger range of Vbg and B. Figure 3a shows the calculated14,15,16 energy dispersion of the spin degenerate LLs with B. All the band parameters of multilayer graphene are not known precisely, so, we refine relatively smaller band parameters γ2, γ5 and δ a little over the known values for bulk graphite19 to understand our experimental data (see Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Note 3 for estimation of band parameters from experimental LL crossing points). We find γ0=3.1 eV, γ1=0.39 eV, γ2=−0.028 eV, γ5=0.01 eV and δ=0.021 eV best describe our data. Figure 3b shows the main fan diagram where the measured longitudinal conductance (Gxx) is plotted as a function of Vbg and B. Due to lack of inversion symmetry, valley degeneracy is not protected in ABA-TLG, it breaks up with increasing B and reveals all the symmetry broken filling factors as seen in Fig. 3b.

Figure 3: LL crossings and resulting QHF ground states.
Figure 3

(a) Calculated low energy spectra using SWMcC parametrization of the tight binding model for ABA-TLG14,15,16. Red and black lines denote the ML and BL LLs respectively. Solid and dashed lines denote LLs coming from k+ and k valleys respectively. Labelled numbers represent the LL indices of the corresponding LLs. (b) Colour scale plot of Gxx, showing the LL fan diagram. ν=0 feature is not seen in this colour scale as the lock-in sensitivity was set to a low value in this measurement to record the low resistance values accurately. The filling factors measured independently from the Gxy are labelled in every plot. As a function of the B, one can observe several crossings on electron and hole side. The data shown in Fig. 2a forms a very thin slice of the low B data shown in this panel. (c) Zoomed-in fan diagram around charge neutrality point showing the occurrence of ν=0 from 6 T: Gxx shows a dip and Gxy shows a plateau at ν=0. The overlaid red line presents Gxy at 13.5 T which shows the occurrence of ν=−1, 0 and 1 plateaus. (d) Zoomed-in recurrent crossings of NM=0 LL with different BL LLs. (e) The lines indicate the LLs seen in the data shown in d and their crossings. Circled numbers denote the filling factors. (f) A further zoomed-in view of the parameter space showing LL crossing of fourfold symmetry broken NM=0 LL with spin split NB=2 LL.

Figure 3c shows measured Gxx focusing on the ν=0 state, which shows a dip right at the charge neutrality point, evident for B>6 T. Corresponding Hall conductance (Gxy) shows a plateau at zero indicating the occurrence of the ν=0 state (see Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Note 4 for longitudinal and Hall resistance data showing ν=0 state). While, the ν=0 plateau has been observed in monolayer graphene20 and in bilayer graphene21 (for B more than 15–25 T), this is the first observation of ν=0 state in trilayer graphene at such low B. A marked reduction in disorder allows observation of the ν=0 state in our device.

Focusing on the electron side, Fig. 3d,e show the experimentally measured LL fan diagram and labelled LLs, respectively. We see that the presence of NM=0 LL gives rise to a series of vertical crossings along the B axis as is expected from the LL energy diagram (Fig. 3a). The highest crossing along the B axis appears when NM=0 crosses with NB=2 LL at 5 T.

From the complex fan diagram, seen in Fig. 3d,e, we can see both above and below the topmost LL crossing (Vbg10 V and B5 T), NM=0 LL is completely symmetry broken and NB=2 LL quartet, on the other hand, becomes two-fold split at 3.5 T. The crossing between NM=0 and NB=2 LLs gives rise to three ring-like structures. Calculated LL energy spectra near the topmost crossing (Fig. 3e, inset) shows that spin splitting is larger than valley splitting for NB=2 LL but valley splitting dominates over spin splitting for NM=0 LL. We note that valley splitting of NM=0 is very large compared with other ML LLs; which arises because ML bands are gapped in ABA-TLG unlike in monolayer graphene. As one follows the NM=0 LL down towards B=0 one observes successive LL crossings of NM=0 with NM=2, 3, 4..... The sharp abrupt bends in the fan diagram occur due to the change of the order of filling up of LLs after crossings and the fact that the horizontal axis is charge density (proportional to Vbg and not LL energy). When these crossings are extrapolated to B=0, we see that NM=0 LL is valley split as expected from the LL energy diagram Fig. 3a.

Role of electronic interaction and theoretical simulation

We next discuss experimental signatures that point towards the importance of interaction. Observation of spin split NM=0 LL at B2 T cannot be explained from the non-interacting Zeeman splitting for Γ1.5 meV on electron side, estimated from the Dingle plot. Also, the large ratio of transport scattering time to quantum scattering time indicates that small angle scattering is dominant, a signature of the long-range nature of the Coulomb potential22,23,24 (see Supplementary Fig. 5 and Supplementary Note 5 for Dingle plot analysis). We also measure activation gap for the symmetry broken states ν=2, 3, 4, 5, 7 at B=13.5 T, and find significantly higher gaps than the non-interacting spin-splitting. For ν=3 and 5, Fermi energy (EF) lies in spin-polarized gap of NM=0 LL in K and K+ valley respectively. Measured energy gap at ν=3 is 5.1 meV and at ν=5 is 2.8 meV, whereas free electron Zeeman splitting is 1.56 meV at B=13.5 T (see Supplementary Fig. 6, Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Note 6 for determination of LL energy gaps from Arrhenius plots). We note that typically the transport gap tends to underestimate the real gap due to the LL broadening, so actual single particle gap might be even larger. This shows the clear role of interactions even with a conservative estimate of the LL gap.

Interaction results in symmetry broken states at low B that are QHF states. For the data in Fig. 3d, ν=2, 3, 4, 5 are QHF states for B>5.5 T. Similarly, ν=7, 8, 9 are also QHF states for 5.5 T>B>4 T. In fact the LLs associated with ν=3, 4, 5 after crossing are the same ML LLs which are responsible for ν=7, 8, 9 before crossing (Fig. 3e). The crossings result in three ring-like structures marked by plus, triangle and hexagon in Fig. 3f.

Now we discuss theoretical calculations to show that electronic interactions are crucial in obtaining a quantitative understanding of the experimental data. The theoretical calculations focus on the NM=0 and NB=2 LLs, which form the most prominent LL crossing pattern in our data. The effect of disorder is incorporated within a self-consistent Born approximation (SCBA)25,26, while electronic interactions are included by considering the exchange corrections to the LL spectrum due to a statically screened Coulomb interaction27,28 in a self-consistent way. Figure 4a shows the DOS at EF as a function of Vbg and B, which matches with the experimental results on the Gxx.

Figure 4: Theoretical calculation of DOS and spin polarization.
Figure 4

(a) DOS at the Fermi level as a function of Vbg and B. This matches the fan diagram seen in the experiment. (b) The magnetization in the system as a function of Vbg and B, where density is converted to an equivalent Vbg, described in Fig. 2b caption. The LL crossing regions clearly show the presence of spin polarization in the system. The inset shows calculated enhanced spin g-factor above the bare value 2 for NM=0 spin and valley split LLs.

Our calculations also provide insight about the polarization of the states inside the ring-like structures (Fig. 3f). We find that although the filling factor of region Δ is the same as that of regions ν=6 above and below, electronic configurations of these states are different. Figure 4b shows the spin-resolved DOS at EF as a function of Vbg and B. We find total spin polarization (integrated spin DOS) in region Δ is non-zero (see Supplementary Fig. 7 and Supplementary Note 7 for the details of theoretical calculation), but it vanishes in regions ν=6 above and below the ring structure. Figure 4b inset shows the calculated exchange enhanced spin g-factors. This shows a significant increase over bare value of g in the spin-polarized states—in agreement with the large gap observed at ν=3 and 5 in the experiment.

Discussion

The key role of interactions is also reflected in the hysteresis of Rxx in the vicinity of the symmetry broken QHF states. Though QHF has been extensively studied in 2DES using semiconductors2,29 there are only a few reports of studying QHF in graphene30,31,32,33. In our experiment, we vary filling factor by changing Vbg at a fixed B (Fig. 5a) and observe that the sweep up and down of Vbg shows a hysteresis in Rxx, which can be attributed to the occurrence of pseudospin magnetic order at the symmetry broken filling factors34 (see Supplementary Fig. 8 and Supplementary Note 8 for more hysteresis data). Corresponding hysteresis is absent in simultaneously measured Hall resistance Rxy (Fig. 5b). Hysteresis in Rxx with Vbg is also absent without magnetic field (see Supplementary Fig. 8 and Supplementary Note 8 for more detail). The pinning, that causes the hysteresis could be due to residual disorder within the system as the domains of the QHF evolve. Along a constant filling factor ν=6 line (Fig. 5c) transport measurements show an appearance of Rxx spikes around the crossing of NM=0 and NB=2 LLs (Fig. 5d). One possible explanation for the spike in Rxx (ref. 35) is the edge state transport along domain wall boundaries as studied earlier in semiconductors29,36.

Figure 5: Hysteresis in the longitudinal resistance as a function of the filling factor and observation of resistance spikes.
Figure 5

(a) Measurement of Rxx as a function of Vbg at B=13.5 T in the two directions as shown in (inset) the measurement parameter space. Largest hysteresis is seen for the spin and valley-polarized NM=0 LL. We have done gate sweep as slow as 3 mV s−1 to check if the hysteresis goes away, however, it stays. Nature of hysteresis does not change. The sweep up and sweep down rates were same. (b) Simultaneously measured Rxy that exhibits clear quantization plateaus in the two sweep directions. (c) The laid white dashed line on the fan diagram shows the parameter space along which the Rxx is plotted in the next panel. (d) Rxx plotted along the dashed line shown in the parameter space. Spikes in resistance, shaded in yellow, correspond to boundaries of the region marked Δ in c.

In summary, we see interaction plays an important role to enhance the g-factor and favours the formation of QHF states at low B and at relatively higher temperature. ABA-TLG is the simplest system that has both massless and massive Dirac fermions, giving rise to an intricate and rich pattern of LLs that, through their crossings, can allow a detailed study of the effect of interaction at sufficiently low temperature. The ability to image these QHF states using modern scanning probe techniques at low magnetic fields could provide insight into these states that have never been imaged previously. In future, experiments on multilayer graphene, exchange coupled with a ferromagnetic insulating substrate37, can lead to the possibility of observing an exciting interplay of QHF with the proximity induced ferromagnetic order.

Methods

Device fabrication

Graphene and hBN flakes were exfoliated by scotch tape method on 300 nm SiO2 coated highly p-doped Si substrate. hBN flakes of thickness 30 nm were located by an optical microscope. ABA-TLG was then transferred to a suitably chosen hBN, followed by another hBN transfer of similar thickness to complete the hBN-graphene-hBN stack. Electron-beam lithography was done to define the contacts. Then the stack was etched with mild plasma in Argon and Oxygen (1:1 ratio) environment to expose the graphene edge. Metal (3 nm Chromium, 15 nm Palladium, 30 nm Gold) was thermally evaporated to make the contacts immediately after etching without breaking the vacuum.

Characterization

After exfoliation on Silicon substrate potential ABA-TLG graphene flakes were chosen by the optical colour contrast and then confirmed by the Raman spectroscopy. Atomic force microscopy was also done on the complete stack to image the topography of the surface and to find out the thickness of the top hBN which is required to calculate the plasma etching time before metallization.

Measurement

All the low-temperature measurements were done in a liquid He4 flow cryostat at base temperature T=1.5 K. Standard low frequency lock-in technique was used to do all current biased four-probe resistance measurements. Excitation current was 100 nA for most of the measurements but sometimes increased to a higher value of 400 nA to measure low resistances at low magnetic fields.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Datta, B. et al. Strong electronic interaction and multiple quantum Hall ferromagnetic phases in trilayer graphene. Nat. Commun. 8, 14518 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14518 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Spin and isospin: exotic order in quantum Hall ferromagnets. Phys. Today 53, 39–45 (2000).

  2. 2.

    et al. Quantum Hall ferromagnetism in a two-dimensional electron system. Science 289, 2320–2323 (2000).

  3. 3.

    Graphene: Tri and tri again. Nat. Phys. 7, 925–926 (2011).

  4. 4.

    , , & Quantum Hall effect and Landau-level crossing of Dirac fermions in trilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 7, 621–625 (2011).

  5. 5.

    et al. Stacking-dependent band gap and quantum transport in trilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 7, 948–952 (2011).

  6. 6.

    et al. Integer quantum Hall effect in trilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 126806 (2011).

  7. 7.

    , & Hund’s rules for the n=0 Landau levels of trilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 85, 165139 (2012).

  8. 8.

    , & Quantum Hall effect and semimetallic behavior of dual-gated ABA-stacked trilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. X 2, 011004 (2012).

  9. 9.

    et al. Trilayer graphene is a semimetal with a gate-tunable band overlap. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 383–388 (2009).

  10. 10.

    et al. Landau level splittings, phase transitions, and nonuniform charge distribution in trilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 066601 (2016).

  11. 11.

    et al. Broken symmetry quantum Hall states in dual-gated ABA trilayer graphene. Nano Lett. 13, 1627–1631 (2013).

  12. 12.

    et al. Tunable symmetries of integer and fractional quantum Hall phases in heterostructures with multiple Dirac bands. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 076807 (2016).

  13. 13.

    et al. Competition between spontaneous symmetry breaking and single-particle gaps in trilayer graphene. Nat. Commun. 5, 5656 (2014).

  14. 14.

    & Landau-level degeneracy and quantum Hall effect in a graphite bilayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 086805 (2006).

  15. 15.

    & Parity and valley degeneracy in multilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 81, 115315 (2010).

  16. 16.

    & New Dirac points and multiple Landau level crossings in biased trilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 87, 115422 (2013).

  17. 17.

    & Gate-induced Dirac cones in multilayer graphenes. Phys. Rev. B 87, 085424 (2013).

  18. 18.

    et al. One-dimensional electrical contact to a two-dimensional material. Science 342, 614–617 (2013).

  19. 19.

    & Intercalation compounds of graphite. Adv. Phys. 51, 1–186 (2002).

  20. 20.

    et al. Landau-level splitting in graphene in high magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 136806 (2006).

  21. 21.

    , , & Symmetry breaking in the zero-energy Landau level in bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 066801 (2010).

  22. 22.

    & Single-particle relaxation time versus transport scattering time in a two-dimensional graphene layer. Phys. Rev. B 77, 195412 (2008).

  23. 23.

    Small-angle scattering in two-dimensional electron gases. Phys. Rev. B 44, 3793 (1991).

  24. 24.

    et al. Spin and interaction effects in Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations and the quantum Hall effect in GaN/AlGaN heterostructures. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 16, 3421 (2004).

  25. 25.

    Theory of quantum transport in a two-dimensional electron system under magnetic fields ii. single-site approximation under strong fields. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 36, 1521–1529 (1974).

  26. 26.

    & Hall conductivity of a two-dimensional graphite system. Phys. Rev. B 65, 245420 (2002).

  27. 27.

    & Theory of oscillatory g factor in an MOS inversion layer under strong magnetic fields. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 37, 1044–1052 (1974).

  28. 28.

    , , & Broken symmetry ν=0 quantum Hall states in bilayer graphene: Landau level mixing and dynamical screening. Phys. Rev. B 85, 235460 (2012).

  29. 29.

    , , & Resistance spikes at transitions between quantum Hall ferromagnets. Science 290, 1546–1549 (2000).

  30. 30.

    & Quantum Hall ferromagnetism in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 256602 (2006).

  31. 31.

    et al. Spin and valley quantum Hall ferromagnetism in graphene. Nat. Phys. 8, 550–556 (2012).

  32. 32.

    et al. Chemical potential and quantum Hall ferromagnetism in bilayer graphene. Science 345, 58–61 (2014).

  33. 33.

    et al. Multicomponent quantum Hall ferromagnetism and Landau level crossing in rhombohedral trilayer graphene. Nano Lett. 16, 227–231 (2016).

  34. 34.

    et al. First-order phase transitions in a quantum Hall ferromagnet. Nature 402, 638–641 (1999).

  35. 35.

    , & Charge excitations in easy-axis and easy-plane quantum Hall ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 196801 (2001).

  36. 36.

    & Resistance spikes and domain wall loops in Ising quantum Hall ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 216801 (2001).

  37. 37.

    , , , & Proximity-induced ferromagnetism in graphene revealed by the anomalous Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 016603 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Allan MacDonald, Jainendra Jain, Jim Eisenstein, Fengcheng Wu, Vibhor Singh, Shamashis Sengupta and Chandni U. for discussions and comments on the manuscript. We also thank John Mathew, Sameer Grover and Vishakha Gupta for experimental assistance. We acknowledge Swarnajayanthi Fellowship of Department of Science and Technology (for M.M.D.) and Department of Atomic Energy of Government of India for support. Preparation of hBN single crystals is supported by the Elemental Strategy Initiative conducted by the MEXT, Japan and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas ‘Science of Atomic Layers’ from JSPS.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400005, India

    • Biswajit Datta
    • , Hitesh Agarwal
    • , Abhinandan Borah
    •  & Mandar M. Deshmukh
  2. Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400005, India

    • Santanu Dey
  3. Department of Theoretical Physics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400005, India

    • Abhisek Samanta
    •  & Rajdeep Sensarma
  4. Advanced Materials Laboratory, National Institute for Materials Science, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba 305-0044, Japan

    • Kenji Watanabe
    •  & Takashi Taniguchi

Authors

  1. Search for Biswajit Datta in:

  2. Search for Santanu Dey in:

  3. Search for Abhisek Samanta in:

  4. Search for Hitesh Agarwal in:

  5. Search for Abhinandan Borah in:

  6. Search for Kenji Watanabe in:

  7. Search for Takashi Taniguchi in:

  8. Search for Rajdeep Sensarma in:

  9. Search for Mandar M. Deshmukh in:

Contributions

B.D. fabricated the device, conceived the experiments and analysed the data. M.M.D., A.B. and B.D. contributed to the development of the device fabrication process. H.A. helped in the fabrication and in the measurements. K.W. and T.T. grew the hBN crystals. S.D., A.S. and B.D. did the calculations under the supervision of R.S.; B.D., M.M.D. co-wrote the manuscript and R.S. provided input on the manuscript. All authors commented on the manuscript. M.M.D. supervised the project.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rajdeep Sensarma or Mandar M. Deshmukh.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Tables, Supplementary Notes and Supplementary References

  2. 2.

    Peer Review File

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14518

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.