Abstract
Carbon and silicon pentagonal lowdimensional structures attract a great interest as they may lead to new exotic phenomena such as topologically protected phases or increased spin–orbit effects. However, no pure pentagonal phase has yet been realized for any of them. Here we unveil through extensive density functional theory calculations and scanning tunnelling microscope simulations, confronted to key experimental facts, the hidden pentagonal nature of single and doublestrand chiral Si nanoribbons perfectly aligned on Ag(110) surfaces whose structure has remained elusive for over a decade. Our study reveals an unprecedented onedimensional Si atomic arrangement solely comprising almost perfect alternating pentagons residing in the missing row troughs of the reconstructed surface. We additionally characterize the precursor structure of the nanoribbons, which consists of a Si cluster (nanodot) occupying a silver divacancy in a quasihexagonal configuration. The system thus materializes a paradigmatic shift from a silicenelike packing to a pentagonal one.
Introduction
From the simplest cyclopentane ring and its numerous organic derivates to their common appearance in extended geometries such as edges or defects in graphene, pentagons are frequently encountered motifs in carbonrelated systems. Even a pentagraphene Cairotype twodimensional (2D) structure has been proposed as a purely pentagonal C allotrope with outstanding properties competing with those of graphene^{1}. Conversely, pentagonal Si motifs are hardly found in nature. Despite the large effort devoted to design Sibased structures analogous to those of carbon, the existence of Si pentagonal rings has only been reported in clathrate bulk phases^{2} or in complex Si reconstructions^{3,4}. Several theoretical studies have hypothesized stable Si pentagonal structures either in the form of onedimensional (1D) nanotubes^{5,6} or at the reconstructed edges of silicene nanoribbons (NRs)^{7,8} or even as hydrogenated pentasilicene^{9} or highly corrugated fivefold coordinated siliconeet^{10} 2D sheets, the latter recognized as a topological insulator^{11}. However, to date none of them have yet been synthesized.
In the present work we unveil, via extended density functional theory (DFT)^{12} calculations and scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) simulations^{13,14}, the atomic structure of 1D Si NRs grown on the Ag(110) surface. Our analysis reveals that this system constitutes the first experimental evidence of a silicon phase solely comprising pentagonal rings. The possibilities that this unprecedented 1D topography opens are manyfold, ranging from Sibased nanowires in circuits, enlarged spin–orbit effects or even the realization of a new Si allotrope.
Results
STM and Xray Photoemission Spectroscopy (XPS)
Since their discovery in 2005 (ref. 15) the atomic structure of Si NRs on Ag(110) has remained elusive and strongly disputed^{15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23}. Figure 1 presents a summary of Si NRs measured with STM. The structures were obtained after Si sublimation onto a clean Ag(110) surface at room temperature. Figure 1a,c corresponds to a low Si coverage image with an isolated nanodot structure and a singlestrand NR (SNR) 0.8 nm wide running along the [] direction with a 2 × periodicity. The SNR topography consists of alternating protrusions at each side of the strand with a glide plane. At higher coverages and after a mild annealing, a dense and highly ordered phase is formed (Fig. 1e) consisting of doublestrand NRs (DNRs) with a 5 × periodicity along the [001] direction again exhibiting a glide plane along the centre of each DNR. The images are in perfect accord with previous works^{15,17,22,23}. Further key information on the system is provided by the highresolution Si2p core level photoemission spectrum for the DNRs displayed in Fig. 1g—that for the SNRs is almost identical^{24}. The spectrum can be accurately fitted with only two (spin–orbit splitted) components having an intensity ratio of roughly 2:1 (we estimate a maximum error of 20% in the Si_{s}:Si_{ad} intensity ratio based on analogous spectra recorded at different energies or even beamlines^{25}). Furthermore, previous angular resolved photoemission (ARPES) experiments^{25} assigned the larger and smaller components to subsurface Si_{s} and surface Si_{ad} atoms, respectively, indicating that the NRs comprise two different types of Si atoms, with twice as many Si_{s} as Si_{ad}.
Nanodot’s quasihexagonal structure
We first focus on the nanodot shown in Fig. 1a, as it may be regarded as the precursor structure for the formation of the extended NRs. The nanodot exhibits a local pmm symmetry with two bright protrusions aligned along the [001] direction, each of them having two adjacent dimmer features along the [] direction. After considering a large variety of trial models (Supplementary Fig. 1) we found that only one, shown in Fig. 2, correctly reproduces the experimental image both in terms of aspect and overall corrugation. It consists of a 10atom Si cluster located in a double silver vacancy generated by removing two adjacent top row silver atoms. There are four symmetryequivalent Si_{s} atoms residing deeper in the vacancy, two in the middle, which lean towards short silver bridge sites and four outer residing at long bridge sites. The formers lie 0.8 Å above the top Ag atoms and are not resolved in the STM image, while the and protrude out of the surface by 1.4 and 1.1 Å thus leading to the six bump structure in the simulated image with the at the centre appearing brighter. Therefore, although the nanodot shows marked differences with respect to the extended NRs, its structure already accounts for the presence of two distinct types of Si atoms at the surface (Si_{s} and Si_{ad}) and confirms the tendency of the Ag(110) surface to remove top row silver atoms on Si adsorption^{22,26}, as could be expected from the low stability of this particular surface^{27,28}.
Singlestrand Si pentagonal NRs
Inspired by the nanodot Ag divacancy structure and by recent STM and grazing incidence Xray diffraction measurements^{26} pointing towards the existence of a missing row (MR) reconstruction along the [] direction of the Ag surface, we considered several trial structures for the SNRs by placing Si atoms in the MR troughs (Si_{s}) and next adding further adatoms (Si_{ad}) on top, while maintaining a 2:1 concentration ratio between the two. Figure 3a,b shows top and side views of the optimized geometry for the SNRs after testing several trial models (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 1). It involves a MR and six Si atoms per cell. The new paradigm is the arrangement of the Si atoms into pentagonal rings running along the MR and alternating their orientation (we denote it as the pentagonal missing row (PMR) model). Despite no symmetry restriction was imposed, the relaxed PMR SNR belongs to the cmm group presenting two mirror planes plus an additional glide plane along the MR troughs (see Supplementary Fig. 3 for a detailed description). Apart from a considerable buckling of 0.7 Å between the lower Si atoms residing in the MR troughs (Si_{s}) and the higher ones (Si_{ad}) leaning towards short bridge sites at the top silver row, the pentagonal ring may be considered as rather perfect, with a very small dispersion in the Si–Si distances (2.35–2.37 Å) and bond angles ranging between 92° and 117°, that is, all close to the 108° in a regular pentagon. The associated STM image and line profile, Fig. 3c,d, show (symmetry) equivalent protrusions 1.3 Å high at each side of the strand, in perfect agreement with the experimental image Fig. 1c. Still, since different models may yield similar STM images, a more conclusive gauge to discriminate among them is to examine their relative formation energies. In this respect, the energetic stability of the PMR structure is far better (∼0.1 eV per Si) than all other SNR models considered (Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 2).
Doublestrand Si pentagonal NRs
Within the pentagonal model the DNR structure may be naturally generated by placing two SNRs within a c(10 × 2) cell. However, since the PMR SNRs are chiral, adjacent pentagonal rings may be placed with the same or with different handedness, leading to two possible arrangements among the enantiomers. Figure 3f–i displays the optimized geometry and simulated STM topography for the most stable (by 0.03 eV per Si) PMR DNR configuration. The pentagonal structure in each NR is essentially preserved, the main difference with respect to the SNRs being the loss of the glide plane along the MR troughs replaced by a new one along the top silver row between adjacent SNRs. There is a slight repulsion between the NRs, which shifts them away from each other by around 0.2 Å. As a result, the Si_{ad} at the outer edges of the DNR end up lying 0.07 Å higher than the inner ones making the alternating pentagons along each strand not strictly equivalent anymore. In the simulated STM image the outer maxima appear dimmer than the inner ones by 0.1 Å, which adopt a zigzag aspect. The inversion in their relative corrugations is due to the proximity between the inner Si adatoms (∼4 Å) compared with the almost 6 Å distance between the inner and outer ones, so that the bumps of the formers overlap and lead to brighter maxima. All these features are in accordance with the experimental profiles shown in Fig. 1f. In fact, the PMR DNR structure is the most stable among all other NR models considered for a wide range of Si chemical potentials ranging from Sipoor to rich conditions (Supplementary Fig. 4).
Electronic properties
Figure 4 presents a summary of the electronic properties of the PMR structure. Figure 4a shows an isosurface of the total electronic density for the SNRs. The Si_{s} atoms in the pentagonal rings are clearly linked through an sp^{2} type bonding (three bonds each) while the Si_{ad}, due to the buckling, show a distorted sp^{3} type tetrahedral arrangement making bonds with two Si_{s}, as well as with the adjacent short bridge silver atoms in the top row. Figure 4b displays ARPES spectra for the SNR and DNR phases. Both energy distribution curves reveal Sirelated peaks previously attributed to quantum well states originating from the lateral confinement within the NRs. For the SNRs three states are observed at −1.0, −2.4 and −3.1 eV binding energy, while for the DNRs one further peak is identified at −1.4 eV. The computed (semiinfinite) surface band structures projected on the Si pentagons (blue) and the silver MR surface (red) are superimposed in Fig. 4c,d for the SNRs and DNRs, respectively. Overall, within the expected DFT accuracy and experimental resolution, the maps satisfactorily reproduce the experimental spectra. At the SNRs present two sharp intense Si bands below the Fermi level (S1 and S3) and faint (broader) features arising from two almost degenerate bands (S4 and S5) and a dimmer state (S2). As expected, they are almost flat along while along they present an appreciable dispersion and finally merge into two degenerate states at the high symmetry point. The orbital character of the S2–S5 bands is mainly p_{xy} and may thus be assigned to localized sp^{2} planar bonds. Conversely, band S1 is fully dominated by the Si_{s}pz states (πband) and shows a strong downward dispersion along due to hybridization with the metal sp bands. Similarly, faint dispersive bands of mainly p_{z} character hybridizing with the metal appear in the empty state region. The electronic structure for the DNRs is similar to that of the SNRs, except that the number of Si bands is doubled and most of them become splitted and shifted due to the interaction between adjacent SNRs. Noteworthy is the appearance of an electron pocket at associated to a parabolic Sip_{z} band with onset at −0.5 eV, as well as the large Fermi velocities ( m s^{−1}) found in the linear part of the intense bands emerging from (indicated by circles in Fig. 4d).
Discussion
We have solved the long debated structure of silicon NRs on Ag(110), finding an unprecedented 1D Si pentagonal phase, which consists of adjacent inverted pentagons stabilized within the MR troughs. The model is in accordance with most of previous experimental results for this system: it involves a MR reconstruction as deduced from Xray diffraction^{26}, comprises two types of Si atoms with a ratio 2:1 between the Si_{s} and Si_{ad} concentrations as seen by photoemission, accurately matches the STM topographs also explaining dislocation defects between NRs (Supplementary Fig. 6) and accounts for the quantum well states measured by ARPES. We have also determined the quasihexagonal geometry of a Si nanodot inside a silver divacancy. This precursor structure for the NRs can be considered as the limiting process for expelling surface Ag atoms to create a MR along which the Si pentagons can develop. At this point, however, we cannot determine the precise diffusion mechanism or that behind the hexagonaltopentagonal transition (Supplementary Fig. 7). The discovery of this unique Sibased pentagonal phase puts hope on the realization of a new 1D Si allotrope, which could be achieved by weakening the NR–substrate interaction. Possible routes to this end could be intercalation of more inert species, their growth on a different substrate or hydrogenation processes. In fact, a pristine (freestanding) Si pentagonal strand is found to be metastable and when hydrogenated it even becomes more stable than when adsorbed on the Ag(110) surface (see Supplementary Fig. 8 for a summary of the atomic and electronic structure of freestanding pristine and hydrogenated Si pentagonal NRs). We are also convinced that our study will promote the synthesis of analogous exotic Si phases on alternative templates with promising properties^{10}.
Methods
Experimental
For both types of prepared structures (isolated Si SNRs or ordered DNRs), the same procedure has been used for sample preparation: that is, the Ag(110) substrate was cleaned in the ultrahigh vacuum chambers (base pressure: 9 × 10^{−11} mbar) by repeated sputtering of Ar^{+} ions and subsequent annealing of the substrate at 750 K, while keeping the pressure below 3 × 10^{−10} mbar during heating. Si was evaporated at a rate of 0.03 ml min^{−1} from a silicon source to form the NRs. The Ag substrate was kept at room temperature to form the isolated SNR 0.8 nm wide, while a mild heating of the Ag substrate at 443 K allows the formation of an ordered grating DNR 1.6 nm wide^{24}.
STM measurements were done with a homemade variable temperature ultrahigh vacuum STM^{29}. All STM data were measured and processed with the WSxM software^{30}. Highresolution photoelectron spectroscopy experiments of the shallow Si2p core levels and of the valence states, were carried out to probe, comparatively, the structure and the electronic properties of those nanostructures. The ARPES experiments were carried out at the I511 beamline of the Swedish Synchrotron Facility MAXLAB in Sweden. The end station is equipped with a Scienta R4000 electron spectrometer rotatable around the propagation direction of the synchrotron light. It also houses lowenergy electron diffraction and sputter cleaning setups. Further details on the beam line are given in ref. 31. In all the photoemission spectra the binding energy is referenced to the Fermi level. The total experimental resolution for core level and valence band spectra were 30 meV (hν=135.8 eV for Si2p) and 20 meV (hν=75 eV for the valence band), respectively. A leastsquare fitting procedure was used to analyse the core levels, with two doublets, each with a spin–orbit splitting of 610±5 meV and a branching ratio of 0.42. The Si2p core level collected at normal emission is dominated by the Si_{s} component. Its full width at half maximum is only 68 meV while the energy difference between the two Si_{s} and Si_{ad} components is 0.22 eV.
Theory
All calculations have been carried out at the ab initio level within the DFT using the SIESTAGREEN package^{12,13}. For the exchange–correlation interaction we considered both the local density^{32} (LDA) as well as the generalized gradient^{33} (GGA) approximations. Test calculations showed that including van der Waals corrections^{34,35} yielded negligible changes in the optimized geometries and, therefore, they have been neglected (the same conclusion was reached in ref. 22).The atomic orbital basis set consisted of doublezeta polarized numerical orbitals strictly localized after setting a confinement energy of 100 meV in the basis set generation process. Real space threecentre integrals were computed over threedimensional grids with a resolution equivalent to a 700 Rydbergs mesh cutoff. Brillouin zone integration was performed over ksupercells of around (20 × 28) relative to the Ag(1 × 1) lattice while the temperature kT in the Fermi–Dirac distribution was set to 100 meV.
All considered SiNRAg(110) structures were relaxed using 2D periodic slabs involving nine metal layers with the NR adsorbed at the upper side of the slab. A c(10 × 2) supercell was used for both the SNR and DNR structures. In all cases, the Si atoms and the first three metallic layers were allowed to relax until forces were below 0.02 eV Å^{−1} while the rest of silver layers were held fixed to their bulk positions (for which we used our LDA (GGA)optimized lattice constant of 4.07 Å (4.15 Å), slightly smaller (larger) than the 4.09 Å experimental value). For the nanodot calculations, and given that a larger unit cell is required to simulate its isolated geometry, the atomic relaxations of all the trial models (Supplementary Fig. 1) were carried out for (4 × 5) or (4 × 6) supercells. Once the correct structure was identified (Supplementary Fig. 1), we further optimized it increasing the unit cell to a (6 × 10) to remove any overlaps between image cells (see Fig. 2 in the main text). Finally, for the pentasilicene freestanding calculations shown in Supplementary Fig. 8 we considered 1D strand geometries with a × 2 periodicity with respect to the Ag(110) lattice parameter along the direction. The calculated stress in the strands was nevertheless small (∼3 × 10^{−3} eV Å^{−3}).
Band structure
To examine the surface band dispersion we computed kresolved surface projected density of states PDOS(, E) maps in a semiinfinite geometry. To this end we stacked the SiNR and first metallic layers on top of an Ag(110) bulklike semiinfinite block via Green’s functions matching techniques following the prescription detailed elsewhere^{14,36}. For this step we recomputed the slab’s Hamiltonian using highly extended orbitals (confinement energy of just 10–20 meV) for the Si and Ag surface atoms in the top two layers (this way the spatial extension of the electronic density in the vacuum region is largely extended and the calculation becomes more accurate.
STM simulations
For the STM simulations we modelled the tip as an Ag(111) semiinfinite block with a oneatomterminated pyramid made of 10 Si atoms stacked below acting as the apex (Supplementary Fig. 5). Test calculations using other tips (for example, clean Ag or clean W) did not yield any significant changes. Highly extended orbitals were again used to describe both the surface and the apex atoms thus reproducing better the expected exponential decay of the current with the tipsample normal distance z_{tip}. Tipsample atomic orbital interactions were computed at the DFT level using a slab including the Si NR on top of three silver layers, as well as the Si tip apex. The interactions (Hamiltonian matrix elements) were stored for different relative tipsurface positions and next fitted to obtain Slater–Koster parameters that allow a fast and accurate evaluation of these interactions for any tipsample relative position^{14}. Our Green’s functionbased formalism to simulate STM images includes only the elastic contribution to the current and assumes just one single tunnelling process across the STM interface; it has been extensively described in previous works^{13,14}. Here we used an imaginary part of the energy of 20 meV, which also corresponds to the resolution used in the energy grid when integrating the transmission coefficient over the bias window. We further assumed the socalled wide band limit at the tip^{14} to alleviate the computational cost and remove undesired tip electronic features. The images were computed at different biases between −2 and +2 V scanning the entire unit cell with a lateral resolution of 0.4 Å always assuming a fixed current of 1 nA. Nevertheless, the aspect of the images hardly changed with the bias, in accordance with most experimental results.
Energetics
To establish the energetic hierarchy among different Si NR structures we first computed their adsorption energies (per Si atom), E_{ads}, via the simple expression:
where N_{Si/Ag} are the number of Si and Ag atoms in the slab containing the NR and the Ag(110) surface, E_{tot}(N_{Ag},N_{Si}) refers to its total energy, E_{surf}(N_{Ag}) the energy of the clean Ag surface without the NRs (but including any MRs) and E^{0}_{Si} the energy of an isolated Si atom. In the low temperature limit equation (1) allows to discriminate between structures with the same number of silver and Si atoms (Supplementary Table 2).
However, a more correct approach to compare the NR’s stabilities between structures with different Si and Ag concentrations is to compute their formation energies, γ, as a function of the Si and Ag chemical potentials, μ_{Si/Ag}. To this end, we use the standard low temperature expression for the grandcanonical thermodynamic potential^{37}:
The chemical potentials may be obtained via , where corresponds to the total energy of the isolated atom and to that of a reference structure acting as a reservoir of Ag or Si atoms. Here we use the bulk f.c.c. phase for silver (and ), while that of Si is considered as a parameter (see below). The NR’s formation energy, normalized to the Ag(110)(1 × 1) surface unit cell area, then takes the form
with N=10 because the same c(10 × 2) was used for all NR structures and accounts for the formation energy of the unrelaxed surface at the bottom of the slab, which was obtained according to with giving the total energy of an unrelaxed nine layerthick Ag(110)(1 × 1) slab.
We follow the standard procedure of treating the Si chemical potential as a parameter in equation (3) and plot the formation energies for each structure as a function of in Supplementary Fig. 4a,b for the LDA and GGAderived energies, respectively. However, since a reference structure for the Si reservoir is not available (and hence the absolute value of is unknown) we plot the formation energies as a function of a chemical potential shift, , whose origin is placed at the first crossing between the formation energy of the clean Ag(110) and that of any of the NRs (in our case it corresponds to the PMR DNR structure). Within this somewhat arbitrary choice, small or negative values of would correspond to Sipoor conditions, while large positive values to Sirich conditions.
Finally, the NR–H interaction strengths for the hydrogenated P+n_{H} NRs shown in the Supplementary Fig. 8 were determined from the total energy of the freestanding pentagonal strand, , via
where N_{Si}=6 and n_{H}=2, 4 and 6 are the total number of Si and H atoms per × 2 cell and the total energy of an isolated H atom.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Cerdá, J. I. et al. Unveiling the pentagonal nature of perfectly aligned singleand doublestrand Si nanoribbons on Ag(110). Nat. Commun. 7, 13076 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13076 (2016).
References
Zhang, S. et al. Pentagraphene: a new carbon allotrope. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 2372–2377 (2015).
Melinon, P. et al. Electronic signature of the pentagonal rings in silicon clathrate phases: comparison with clusterassembled films. Phys. Rev. B 58, 12590–12593 (1998).
Stekolnikov, A. A., Furthmüller, J. & Bechstedt, F. Longrange surface reconstruction: Si(110)−(16 × 2). Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 136104 (2004).
Battaglia, C. et al. New structural model for the Si(331)−(12 × 1) surface reconstruction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 066102 (2009).
Berkdemir, C. & Gülseren, O. Firstprinciples investigation of pentagonal and hexagonal coreshell silicon nanowires with various core compositions. Phys. Rev. B 180, 115334 (2009).
Sen, P., Gülseren, O., Yildirim, T., Batra Inder, P. & Ciraci, S. Pentagonal nanowires: a firstprinciples study of the atomic and electronic structure. Phys. Rev. B 65, 235433 (2002).
Kara, A. et al. Physics of silicene stripes. J. Supercond. Novel Magn. 22, 259–263 (2009).
Ding, Y. & Wang, Y. Electronic structures of reconstructed zigzag silicene nanoribbons. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 083111 (2014).
Ding, Y. & Wang, Y. Hydrogeninduced stabilization and tunable electronic structures of pentasilicene: a computational study. J. Mater. Chem. C 3, 11341–11348 (2015).
Wang, Z. et al. Prediction of novel stable 2Dsilicon with fivefold coordination. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.08848 (2015).
Ma, Y., Kou, L., Li, X., Dai, Y. & Heine, T. Room temperature quantum spin Hall states in twodimensional crystals composed of pentagonal rings and their quantum wells. NPG Asia Mater. 8, e264 (2016).
Soler, J. M. et al. The siesta method for ab initio order n materials simulation. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 2745 (2002).
Cerdá, J., Van Hove, M. A., Sautet, P. & Salmerón, M. Efficient method for the simulation of STM images. I. Generalized greenfunction formalism. Phys. Rev. B 56, 15885–15899 (1997).
Rossen, E. T. R., Flipse, C. F. J. & Cerdá, J. I. Lowest order in inelastic tunneling approximation: efficient scheme for simulation of inelastic electron tunneling data. Phys. Rev. B 87, 235412 (2013).
Léandri, C. et al. Selfaligned silicon quantum wires on Ag(110). Surf. Sci. 574, L9–L15 (2005).
He, G.M. Atomic structure of si nanowires on Ag(110): A densityfunctional theory study. Phys. Rev. B 73, 035311 (2006).
Ronci, F. et al. Low temperature STM/STS study of silicon nanowires grown on the Ag(110) surface. Phys. Status Solidi C 7, 2716–2719 (2010).
Lian, C. & Ni, J. The structural and electronic properties of silicon nanoribbons on Ag(110): a first principles study. Phys. B: Conden. Matter 407, 4695–4699 (2012).
Borensztein, Y., Prévot, G. & Masson, L. Large differences in the optical properties of a single layer of Si on Ag(110) compared to silicene. Phys. Rev. B 89, 245410 (2014).
Lagarde, P., Chorro, M., Roy, D. & Tercera, N. Study by EXAFS of the local structure around Si on silicene deposited on Ag(110) and Ag(111) surfaces. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 28, 075002 (2016).
De Padova, P. et al. Evidence of graphenelike electronic signature in silicene nanoribbons. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 261905 (2010).
Hogan, C., Colonna, S., Flammini, R., Cricenti, A. & Ronci, F. Structure and stability of Si/Ag(110) nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. B 92, 115439 (2015).
Feng, B., Li, H., Meng, S., Chen, L. & Wu, K. Structure and quantum well states in silicene nanoribbons on Ag(110). Surf. Sci. 645, 74–79 (2016).
Dávila, M. E. et al. Comparative structural and electronic studies of hydrogen interaction with isolated versus ordered silicon nanoribbons grown on Ag(110). Nanotechnology 23, 385703 (2012).
De Padova, P. et al. Growth of straight, atomically perfect, highly metallic silicon nanowires with chiral asymmetry. Nano Lett. 8, 271–275 (2008).
Bernard, R. et al. Growth of Si ultrathin films on silver surfaces: evidence of an Ag(110) reconstruction induced by Si. Phys. Rev. B 88, 121411 (2013).
Vilfan, I., Lançon, F. & Adam, E. Lattice vibrations and stability of reconstructed (110) noble metal surfaces. Surf Sci 440, 279–289 (1999).
Zhang, J.M., Li, H.Y. & Xu, K.W. Missing row reconstructed (110), (211) and (311) surfaces for FCC transition metals. Surf. Interface Anal. 39, 660–664 (2007).
Custance, O. et al. Single adatom adsorption and diffusion on Si(111)−(7 × 7) surfaces: scanning tunneling microscopy and firstprinciples calculations. Phys. Rev. B 67, 235410 (2003).
Horcas, I. et al. Wsxm: a software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 013705 (2007).
Denecke, R. et al. Beamline {I511} at {MAX} ii, capabilities and performance. J. Electron Spectros. Relat. Phenom. 101–103, 971–977 (1999).
Ceperley, D. M. & Alder, B. J. Ground state of the electron gas by a stochastic method. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566–569 (1980).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Ortmann, F. & Bechstedt, F. Semiempirical van der Waals correction to the density functional description of solids and molecular structures. Phys. Rev. B 73, 205101 (2006).
Cuadrado, R. et al. CoPc adsorption on Cu(111): origin of the C4 to C2 symmetry reduction. J. Chem. Phys. 133, 154701 (2010).
Rogero, C., MartínGago, J. A. & Cerdá, J. I. Subsurface structure of epitaxial rareearth silicides imaged by STM. Phys. Rev. B 74, 121404 (2006).
Pflugradt, P., Matthes, L. & Bechstedt, F. Silicenederived phases on Ag(111) substrate versus coverage: Ab initio studies. Phys. Rev. B 89, 035403 (2014).
De Padova, P. et al. 1D graphenelike silicon systems: silicene nanoribbons. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 223001 (2012).
Acknowledgements
This work has been funded by the Spanish MINECO under contract Nos. MAT201347878C2R, MAT201566888C31R, CSD201000024, MAT201341636P, AYA201239832C0201 and ESP201567842P.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.I.C. and J.S. performed all the theoretical calculations; A.C.M., M.E.D. and J.M.G.R. performed all the STM experiments; M.E.D. and G.L.L. performed the ARPES measurements; J.I.C. and M.E.D. conceived most of the novel model structures tested; J.I.C. and G.L.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the manuscript and figure preparation.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 18 and Supplementary Tables 12 (PDF 26520 kb)
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Cerdá, J., Sławińska, J., Le Lay, G. et al. Unveiling the pentagonal nature of perfectly aligned singleand doublestrand Si nanoribbons on Ag(110). Nat Commun 7, 13076 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13076
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13076
Further reading

First Principles Study of Pentasiligraphene as HighPerformance Anode Material for LiIon Batteries
Nanoscale Research Letters (2019)

Symmetryprotected metallic and topological phases in pentamaterials
Scientific Reports (2019)

Oxidative reactivity of alkalilike superatoms of group 5 metalencapsulating Si16 cage nanoclusters
Communications Chemistry (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.